For the past 150 years, the prevailing view of the local interstellar medium has been based on a peculiarity known as the Gould Belt1,2,3,4, an expanding ring of young stars, gas and dust, tilted about 20 degrees to the Galactic plane. However, the physical relationship between local gas clouds has remained unknown because the accuracy in distance measurements to such clouds is of the same order as, or larger than, their sizes5,6,7. With the advent of large photometric surveys8 and the astrometric survey9, this situation has changed10. Here we reveal the three-dimensional structure of all local cloud complexes. We find a narrow and coherent 2.7-kiloparsec arrangement of dense gas in the solar neighbourhood that contains many of the clouds thought to be associated with the Gould Belt. This finding is inconsistent with the notion that these clouds are part of a ring, bringing the Gould Belt model into question. The structure comprises the majority of nearby star-forming regions, has an aspect ratio of about 1:20 and contains about three million solar masses of gas. Remarkably, this structure appears to be undulating, and its three-dimensional shape is well described by a damped sinusoidal wave on the plane of the Milky Way with an average period of about 2 kiloparsecs and a maximum amplitude of about 160 parsecs.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Herschel, J. F. W. Results of Astronomical Observations Made During the Years 1834, 5, 6, 7, 8, at the Cape of Good Hope; Being the Completion of a Telescopic Survey of the Whole Surface of the Visible Heavens, Commenced in 1825 (Smith, Elder and Company, 1847).
Gould, B. A. On the number and distribution of the bright fixed stars. Am. J. Sci. 38, 325–333 (1874).
Bobylev, V. V. The Gould belt. Astrophysics 57, 583–604 (2014).
Palouš, J. & Ehlerová, S. in Handbook of Supernovae (eds Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P.) 2301–2311 (Springer, 2016).
Maddalena, R. J., Morris, M., Moscowitz, J. & Thaddeus, P. The large system of molecular clouds in Orion and Monoceros. Astrophys. J. 303, 375–391 (1986).
Lombardi, M., Lada, C. J. & Alves, J. Hipparcos distance estimates of the Ophiuchus and the Lupus cloud complexes. Astron. Astrophys. 480, 785–792 (2008).
Schlafly, E. F. et al. A large catalog of accurate distances to molecular clouds from ps1 photometry. Astrophys. J. 786, 29 (2014).
Chambers, K. C. et al. The Pan-STARRS1 surveys. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05560 (2016).
Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., Prusti, T. & de Bruijne, J. H. J. Gaia Data Release 2: summary of the contents and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 616, A1 (2018).
Zucker, C. et al. A large catalog of accurate distances to local molecular clouds: the Gaia DR2 edition. Astrophys. J. 879, 125 (2019).
Reipurth, B. (ed.) Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume I: The Northern Sky Vol. 4 (ASP, 2008).
Zucker, C. et al. A compendium of distances to molecular clouds in the star formation handbook. Astron. Astrophys. 633 A51 (2020).
Dame, T. M., Hartmann, D. & Thaddeus, P. The Milky Way in molecular clouds: a new complete CO survey. Astrophys. J. 547, 792–813 (2001).
Planck Collaboration Planck 2013 results. XI. All-sky model of thermal dust emission. Astron. Astrophys. 571, A11 (2014).
Green, G. M. et al. Galactic reddening in 3D from stellar photometry – an improved map. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 478, 651–666 (2018).
Lallement, R. et al. Gaia-2MASS 3D maps of Galactic interstellar dust within 3 kpc. Astron. Astrophys. 625, A135 (2019).
Green, G. M., Schlafly, E. F., Zucker, C., Speagle, J. S. & Finkbeiner, D. P. A 3D dust map based on gaia, Pan-STARRS 1 and 2MASS. Astrophys. J 887, 93 (2019).
Perrot, C. A. & Grenier, I. A. 3D dynamical evolution of the interstellar gas in the Gould belt. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 404, 519–531 (2003).
Elias, F., Cabrera-Caño, J. & Alfaro, E. J. OB stars in the solar neighborhood. I. Analysis of their spatial distribution. Astron. J. 131, 2700–2709 (2006).
Bouy, H. & Alves, J. F. Cosmography of OB stars in the solar neighbourhood. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 584, A26 (2015).
Reid, M. J., Dame, T. M., Menten, K. M. & Brunthaler, A. A parallax-based distance estimator for spiral arm sources. Astrophys. J. 823, 77 (2016).
Reid, M. J. et al. Trigonometric parallaxes of high mass star forming regions: the structure and kinematics of the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. 783, 130 (2014).
Honig, Z. N. & Reid, M. J. Characteristics of spiral arms in late-type galaxies. Astrophys. J. 800, 53 (2015).
D’Onghia, E., Vogelsberger, M. & Hernquist, L. Self-perpetuating spiral arms in disk galaxies. Astrophys. J. 766, 34 (2013).
Goodman, A. A. et al. The bones of the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. 797, 53 (2014).
Elmegreen, B. G., Elmegreen, D. M. & Efremov, Y. N. Regularly spaced infrared peaks in the dusty spirals of Messier 100. Astrophys. J. 863, 59 (2018).
Edelsohn, D. J. & Elmegreen, B. G. Corrugations in galactic discs generated by magellanic-type perturbers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 287, 947–954 (1997).
Matthews, L. D. & Uson, J. M. Corrugations in the disk of the edge-on spiral galaxy IC 2233. Astrophys. J. 688, 237–244 (2008).
Bally, J. in Handbook of Star Forming Regions Vol. 4 (ed. Reipurth, B.) 459–370 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2008).
Ginsburg, A. PySpecKit: Python spectroscopic toolkit. Astrophysics Source Code Library ascl:1109.001 (2011).
Speagle, J.S. dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.02180 (2019).
J.A. thanks the Radcliffe Institute, where this work was developed, and where J.A. discovered the work of visual artist A. von Mertens on H. Leavitt’s work, which inspired us to “see more”. We acknowledge the organizers and participants of the ‘The Milky Way in the age of Gaia’ workshop of the 2018 Paris-Saclay International Programs for Physical Sciences, as well as the Interstellar Institute, for discussions at the early stage of this work. We benefited from discussions with T. Dame, M. Reid, A. Burkert and M. Davies. J.A. acknowledges the TURIS and Data Science Research Platforms of the University of Vienna. C.Z. and J.S.S. are supported by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (grant number 1650114) and the Harvard Data Science Initiative. D.P.F. and C.Z. acknowledge support by NSF grant AST-1614941. E.F.S. acknowledges support by NASA through ADAP grant NNH17AE75I and Hubble Fellowship grant HST-HF2-51367.001-A awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract NAS 5-26555. The computations in this paper used resources from the Odyssey cluster, which is supported by the FAS Division of Science Research Computing Group at Harvard University. The high-dimensional visualization software Glue, which was used to explore, visualize and understand the Radcliffe Wave, was created by A.A.G., T.R., C.Z. and others, and has been supported by US Government contract NAS5-03127 through NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope Mission and NSF awards OAC-1739657 and AST-1908419. We are grateful to A. Johnson and others at Plotly Graphing Library for their help creating the 3D interactive figure, which was output from Glue to Plotly. WorldWide Telescope (WWT), which was used within Glue to visualize the wave, is currently supported by NSF grant 1642446 to the American Astronomical Society. WWT was originally created by C. Wong and J. Fay at Microsoft Research, which supported WWT development before the American Astronomical Society. J.S.S. thanks R. Bleich, and J.A. thanks A. dell’Erba, J. Alves, M. Alves and R. Alves for continuing support.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
a, b, The blue points in a are as in Fig. 1 and the orange points in b represent the predicted positions of the blue points as if they were following a ‘universal’ Galactic rotation curve22. The line segments represent 1σ errors, derived from a Gaussian fitting for the observed velocities and the distance uncertainties for the predicted velocities, and are generally smaller than the symbols. The quasi-linear arrangement in velocity of the Radcliffe Wave complexes suggests that the structure is not a random alignment of molecular cloud complexes, but a kinematically coherent structure. The tentative decoupling between observed and predicted velocities also indicate that the Radcliffe Wave is a kinematically coherent structure. VLSR, velocity in the local-standard-of-rest frame.
This Figure is the interactive 3D counterpart to Figure 2 and colours are as in Figure 2. For interactive navigation of the data, ‘click and drag’ the Figure. To zoom in and out, ‘click and drag’ the Figure with two fingers or, on a desktop, use the mouse wheel. Hover over any point to view the cloud name. Complementary data layers are available on the right side of the Figure and can be displayed by selecting/de-selecting a particular layer.
About this article
Cite this article
Alves, J., Zucker, C., Goodman, A.A. et al. A Galactic-scale gas wave in the solar neighbourhood. Nature 578, 237–239 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1874-z
Astronomy & Astrophysics (2021)
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters (2021)
Astronomy & Astrophysics (2021)
Astronomy & Astrophysics (2021)
The nearby spiral density-wave structure of the Galaxy: line-of-sight velocities of the Gaia DR2 OB stars
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2021)