Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Atomically dispersed iron hydroxide anchored on Pt for preferential oxidation of CO in H2


Proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are attractive next-generation power sources for use in vehicles and other applications1, with development efforts focusing on improving the catalyst system of the fuel cell. One problem is catalyst poisoning by impurity gases such as carbon monoxide (CO), which typically comprises about one per cent of hydrogen fuel2,3,4. A possible solution is on-board hydrogen purification, which involves preferential oxidation of CO in hydrogen (PROX)3,4,5,6,7. However, this approach is challenging8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 because the catalyst needs to be active and selective towards CO oxidation over a broad range of low temperatures so that CO is efficiently removed (to below 50 parts per million) during continuous PEMFC operation (at about 353 kelvin) and, in the case of automotive fuel cells, during frequent cold-start periods. Here we show that atomically dispersed iron hydroxide, selectively deposited on silica-supported platinum (Pt) nanoparticles, enables complete and 100 per cent selective CO removal through the PROX reaction over the broad temperature range of 198 to 380 kelvin. We find that the mass-specific activity of this system is about 30 times higher than that of more conventional catalysts consisting of Pt on iron oxide supports. In situ X-ray absorption fine-structure measurements reveal that most of the iron hydroxide exists as Fe1(OH)x clusters anchored on the Pt nanoparticles, with density functional theory calculations indicating that Fe1(OH)x–Pt single interfacial sites can readily react with CO and facilitate oxygen activation. These findings suggest that in addition to strategies that target oxide-supported precious-metal nanoparticles or isolated metal atoms, the deposition of isolated transition-metal complexes offers new ways of designing highly active metal catalysts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Synthetic scheme, Fe loadings and morphology of the xcFe–Pt/SiO2 catalysts.
Fig. 2: Catalytic performance of xcFe–Pt/SiO2, Pt/SiO2 and Pt/Fe2O3 catalysts in the PROX reaction.
Fig. 3: In situ XAFS measurements of the 1cFe–Pt/SiO2 catalyst at the Fe K edge and the Pt L3 edge for as-prepared 1cFe–Pt/SiO2–O, reduction at room temperature (1cFe–Pt/SiO2–R) and the PROX reaction at room temperature (1cFe–Pt/SiO2–P).
Fig. 4: Proposed reaction pathways for CO oxidation on Fe1(OH)3@Pt(100).

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of the study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information.


  1. Mehta, V. & Cooper, J. S. Review and analysis of PEM fuel cell design and manufacturing. J. Power Sources 114, 32–53 (2003).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Haryanto, A., Fernando, S., Murali, N. & Adhikari, S. Current status of hydrogen production techniques by steam reforming of ethanol: a review. Energy Fuels 19, 2098–2106 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, K., Wang, A. Q. & Zhang, T. Recent advances in preferential oxidation of CO reaction over platinum group metal catalysts. ACS Catal. 2, 1165–1178 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Park, E. D., Lee, D. & Lee, H. C. Recent progress in selective CO removal in a H2-rich stream. Catal. Today 139, 280–290 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Trimm, D. L. Minimisation of carbon monoxide in a hydrogen stream for fuel cell application. Appl. Catal. A  296, 1–11 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bion, N., Epron, F., Moreno, M., Marino, F. & Duprez, D. Preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide in the presence of hydrogen (PROX) over noble metals and transition metal oxides: advantages and drawbacks. Top. Catal. 51, 76–88 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Saavedra, J. et al. Controlling activity and selectivity using water in the Au-catalysed preferential oxidation of CO in H2. Nat. Chem. 8, 584–589 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grisel, R. J. H. & Nieuwenhuys, B. E. Selective oxidation of CO over supported Au catalysts. J. Catal. 199, 48–59 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Qiao, B. T. et al. Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt1/FeOx. Nat. Chem. 3, 634–641 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Qiao, B. T. et al. Ferric oxide-supported Pt subnano clusters for preferential oxidation of CO in H2-rich gas at room temperature. ACS Catal. 4, 2113–2117 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fukuoka, A., Kimura, J. I., Oshio, T., Sakamoto, Y. & Ichikawa, M. Preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide catalyzed by platinum nanoparticles in mesoporous silica. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 10120–10125 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu, Q. et al. Interface-confined ferrous centers for catalytic oxidation. Science 328, 1141–1144 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alayoglu, S., Nilekar, A. U., Mavrikakis, M. & Eichhorn, B. Ru–Pt core–shell nanoparticles for preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide in hydrogen. Nat. Mater. 7, 333–338 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ko, E. Y., Park, E. D., Lee, H. C., Lee, D. & Kim, S. Supported Pt–Co catalysts for selective CO oxidation in a hydrogen-rich stream. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 734–737 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Watanabe, M., Uchida, H., Ohkubo, K. & Igarashi, H. Hydrogen purification for fuel cells: selective oxidation of carbon monoxide on Pt–Fe/zeolite catalysts. Appl. Catal. B 46, 595–600 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. George, S. M. Atomic layer deposition: an overview. Chem. Rev. 110, 111–131 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu, J. L. et al. Toward atomically-precise synthesis of supported bimetallic nanoparticles using atomic layer deposition. Nat. Commun. 5, 3264 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu, J. L., Elam, J. W. & Stair, P. C. Atomic layer deposition – sequential self-limiting surface reactions for advanced catalyst “bottom-up” synthesis. Surf. Sci. Rep. 71, 410–472 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Puurunen, R. L. Surface chemistry of atomic layer deposition: a case study for the trimethylaluminum/water process. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 121301 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rooth, M. et al. Atomic layer deposition of iron oxide thin films and nanotubes using ferrocene and oxygen as precursors. Chem. Vap. Depos. 14, 67–70 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Scheffe, J. R. et al. Atomic layer deposition of iron(III) oxide on zirconia nanoparticles in a fluidized bed reactor using ferrocene and oxygen. Thin Solid Films 517, 1874–1879 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Neill, B. J. et al. Catalyst design with atomic layer deposition. ACS Catal. 5, 1804–1825 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, G. X. et al. Interfacial effects in iron-nickel hydroxide–platinum nanoparticles enhance catalytic oxidation. Science 344, 495–499 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fu, Q., Yang, F. & Bao, X. H. Interface-confined oxide nanostructures for catalytic oxidation reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1692–1701 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Westre, T. E. et al. A multiplet analysis of Fe K-edge 1s→3d pre-edge features of iron complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 6297–6314 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Paul, R., Reifenberger, R. G., Fisher, T. S. & Zemlyanov, D. Y. Atomic layer deposition of FeO on Pt(111) by ferrocene adsorption and oxidation. Chem. Mater. 27, 5915–5924 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Butcher, D. R. et al. In situ oxidation study of Pt(110) and its interaction with CO. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 20319–20325 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhai, Y. P. et al. Alkali-stabilized Pt-OHx species catalyze low-temperature water-gas shift reactions. Science 329, 1633–1636 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, M. et al. Catalytically active Au-O(OH)x-species stabilized by alkali ions on zeolites and mesoporous oxides. Science 346, 1498–1501 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 21673215, 21533007, 21688102, 91421313, 21473169, U1632263, 11874334 and 51402283); the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grants 2017YFA0402800 and 2016YFA0200600); the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 11621063); the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (grant 2012.0321); the Swedish Research Council (VR; grant 2015-04062); and the One Thousand Young Talents Program under the Recruitment Program of Global Experts. The calculations were performed on the supercomputing system of the Supercomputing Center of the University of Science and Technology of China. The authors also thank the staff at the 1W1B beamline at the Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BSRF), the BL14W1 beamline at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF), the BL12B-a and BL10B beamlines at the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (NSRL), China, and the beamline I311 at the MAX-laboratory, Sweden.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks J. Liu and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



J.L. designed the experiments; L.C. and Q.G. did the catalytic performance evaluation; S.W., W.L., Z.S, L.C., T.Y., H.Y., H.W. and S.C. performed the XAFS measurements; R.Y. and B.W. carried out the scanning tunnelling microscopy characterization; J.W. and M.S. conducted the XPS measurements; Y.L. and C.M. carried out the scanning transmission electron microscopy measurements; Q.L., J.Y. and W.Z. performed the DFT calculations; J.L., Q.L. and S.W. co-wrote the manuscript. All the authors contributed to the overall scientific interpretation and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shiqiang Wei, Jinlong Yang or Junling Lu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary methods, Supplementary Figures 1-39, and Supplementary Tables 1-8

Supplementary Tables

This zipped file contains source data for Supplementary Figures 1-39 and Supplementary Tables 1-8

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, L., Liu, W., Luo, Q. et al. Atomically dispersed iron hydroxide anchored on Pt for preferential oxidation of CO in H2. Nature 565, 631–635 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing