Letter | Published:

Real-time vibrations of a carbon nanotube

Naturevolume 566pages8993 (2019) | Download Citation


The field of miniature mechanical oscillators is rapidly evolving, with emerging applications including signal processing, biological detection1 and fundamental tests of quantum mechanics2. As the dimensions of a mechanical oscillator shrink to the molecular scale, such as in a carbon nanotube resonator3,4,5,6,7, their vibrations become increasingly coupled and strongly interacting8,9 until even weak thermal fluctuations could make the oscillator nonlinear10,11,12,13. The mechanics at this scale possesses rich dynamics, unexplored because an efficient way of detecting the motion in real time is lacking. Here we directly measure the thermal vibrations of a carbon nanotube in real time using a high-finesse micrometre-scale silicon nitride optical cavity as a sensitive photonic microscope. With the high displacement sensitivity of 700 fm Hz−1/2 and the fine time resolution of this technique, we were able to discover a realm of dynamics undetected by previous time-averaged measurements and a room-temperature coherence that is nearly three orders of magnitude longer than previously reported. We find that the discrepancy in the coherence stems from long-time non-equilibrium dynamics, analogous to the Fermi–Pasta–Ulam–Tsingou recurrence seen in nonlinear systems14. Our data unveil the emergence of a weakly chaotic mechanical breather15, in which vibrational energy is recurrently shared among several resonance modes—dynamics that we are able to reproduce using a simple numerical model. These experiments open up the study of nonlinear mechanical systems in the Brownian limit (that is, when a system is driven solely by thermal fluctuations) and present an integrated, sensitive, high-bandwidth nanophotonic interface for carbon nanotube resonators.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Arlett, J. L., Myers, E. B. & Roukes, M. L. Comparative advantages of mechanical biosensors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 203–215 (2011).

  2. 2.

    Poot, M. & van der Zant, H. S. J. Mechanical systems in the quantum regime. Phys. Rep. 511, 273–335 (2012).

  3. 3.

    Sazonova, V. et al. A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator. Nature 431, 284–287 (2004).

  4. 4.

    Jensen, K., Kim, K. & Zettl, A. An atomic-resolution nanomechanical mass sensor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 533–537 (2008).

  5. 5.

    Lassagne, B., Tarakanov, Y., Kinaret, J., Garcia-Sanchez, D. & Bachtold, A. Coupling mechanics to charge transport in carbon nanotube mechanical resonators. Science 325, 1107–1110 (2009).

  6. 6.

    Poncharal, P., Wang, Z. L., Ugarte, D. & de Heer, W. A. Electrostatic deflections and electromechanical resonances of carbon nanotubes. Science 283, 1513–1516 (1999).

  7. 7.

    Chaste, J. et al. A nanomechanical mass sensor with yoctogram resolution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 301–304 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Karabalin, R. B., Cross, M. C. & Roukes, M. L. Nonlinear dynamics and chaos in two coupled nanomechanical resonators. Phys. Rev. B 79, 165309 (2009).

  9. 9.

    Castellanos-Gomez, A., Meerwaldt, H. B., Venstra, W. J., van der Zant, H. S. J. & Steele, G. A. Strong and tunable mode coupling in carbon nanotube resonators. Phys. Rev. B 86, 041402 (2012).

  10. 10.

    Barnard, A. W., Sazonova, V., van der Zande, A. M. & McEuen, P. L. Fluctuation broadening in carbon nanotube resonators. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19093–19096 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Greaney, P. A., Lani, G., Cicero, G. & Grossman, J. C. Anomalous dissipation in single-walled carbon nanotube resonators. Nano Lett. 9, 3699–3703 (2009).

  12. 12.

    Eichler, A., Moser, J., Dykman, M. I. & Bachtold, A. Symmetry breaking in a mechanical resonator made from a carbon nanotube. Nat. Commun. 4, 2843 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Maillet, O. et al. Nonlinear frequency transduction of nanomechanical Brownian motion. Phys. Rev. B 96, 165434 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Fermi, E., Pasta, J. & Ulam, S. Studies of nonlinear problems. Report LA-1940 (Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, 1955).

  15. 15.

    Flach, S., Ivanchenko, M. V. & Kanakov, O. I. q-breathers and the Fermi–Pasta–Ulam problem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 064102 (2005).

  16. 16.

    Tsioutsios, I., Tavernarakis, A., Osmond, J., Verlot, P. & Bachtold, A. Real-time measurement of nanotube resonator fluctuations in an electron microscope. Nano Lett. 17, 1748–1755 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Meerwaldt, H. B., Johnston, S. R., van der Zant, H. S. J. & Steele, G. A. Submicrosecond-timescale readout of carbon nanotube mechanical motion. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 053121 (2013).

  18. 18.

    Moser, J., Eichler, A., Güttinger, J., Dykman, M. I. & Bachtold, A. Nanotube mechanical resonators with quality factors of up to 5 million. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 1007–1011 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Stapfner, S. et al. Cavity-enhanced optical detection of carbon nanotube Brownian motion. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 151910 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Schneider, B. H., Etaki, S., van der Zant, H. S. J. & Steele, G. A. Coupling carbon nanotube mechanics to a superconducting circuit. Sci. Rep. 2, 599 (2012).

  21. 21.

    Miura, R. et al. Ultralow mode-volume photonic crystal nanobeam cavities for high-efficiency coupling to individual carbon nanotube emitters. Nat. Commun. 5, 5580 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Almaqwashi, A. A., Kevek, J. W., Burton, R. M., DeBorde, T. & Minot, E. D. Variable-force microscopy for advanced characterization of horizontally aligned carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology 22, 275717 (2011).

  23. 23.

    Barclay, P. E., Srinivasan, K., Painter, O., Lev, B. & Mabuchi, H. Integration of fiber-coupled high-Q SiNx microdisks with atom chips. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 131108 (2006).

  24. 24.

    Anetsberger, G. et al. Near-field cavity optomechanics with nanomechanical oscillators. Nat. Phys. 5, 909–914 (2009).

  25. 25.

    Zhu, J. et al. On-chip single nanoparticle detection and sizing by mode splitting in an ultrahigh-Q microresonator. Nat. Photon. 4, 46–49 (2010).

  26. 26.

    Joh, D. Y. et al. Single-walled carbon nanotubes as excitonic optical wires. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 51–56 (2011).

  27. 27.

    Liu, K. et al. High-throughput optical imaging and spectroscopy of individual carbon nanotubes in devices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 917–922 (2013).

  28. 28.

    Liu, K. et al. Systematic determination of absolute absorption cross-section of individual carbon nanotubes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7564–7569 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Munteanu, L. & Donescu, S. in Introduction to Soliton Theory: Applications to Mechanics (ed. Van der Werwe, A.) 149–172 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2005).

  30. 30.

    Onorato, M., Vozella, L., Proment, D. & Lvov, Y. V. Route to thermalization in the α-Fermi–Pasta–Ulam system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4208–4213 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Güttinger, J. et al. Energy-dependent path of dissipation in nanomechanical resonators. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 631–636 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Cleland, A. N. & Roukes, M. L. Noise processes in nanomechanical resonators. J. Appl. Phys. 92, 2758–2769 (2002).

  33. 33.

    Goupillaud, P., Grossmann, A. & Morlet, J. Seismic signal analysis and discrimination. III. Cycle-octave and related transforms in seismic signal analysis. Geoexploration 23, 85–102 (1984).

Download references


We thank A. Bachtold for discussions. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant number 0928552. It was also supported by the Cornell Center for Materials Research with funding from the NSF MRSEC programme (DMR-1719875) and funding from IGERT (DGE-0654193). This work was performed in part at the Cornell NanoScale Facility, a member of the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure (NNCI), which is supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant ECCS-1542081). G.S.W. acknowledges FAPESP (grant 2012/17765-7) and CNPq for financial support in Brazil.

Author information

Author notes

    • Arthur W. Barnard

    Present address: Physics Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    • Mian Zhang

    Present address: John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    • Michal Lipson

    Present address: Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

  1. These authors contributed equally: Arthur W. Barnard, Mian Zhang


  1. School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    • Arthur W. Barnard
    •  & Mian Zhang
  2. Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    • Arthur W. Barnard
    •  & Paul L. McEuen
  3. School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    • Mian Zhang
    • , Gustavo S. Wiederhecker
    •  & Michal Lipson
  4. Gleb Wataghin Physics Institute, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

    • Gustavo S. Wiederhecker
  5. Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    • Michal Lipson
    •  & Paul L. McEuen


  1. Search for Arthur W. Barnard in:

  2. Search for Mian Zhang in:

  3. Search for Gustavo S. Wiederhecker in:

  4. Search for Michal Lipson in:

  5. Search for Paul L. McEuen in:


A.W.B. and M.Z. conceived the experiment, designed and fabricated the devices and performed the measurements. A.W.B., M.Z. and G.S.W. performed data analysis. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript. M.L. and P.L.M. supervised the project.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Michal Lipson or Paul L. McEuen.

Extended data figures and tables

  1. Extended Data Fig. 1 Tweezer scattering.

    a, Spatial dependence of optical transmission at a fixed laser detuning as tweezers are scanned across the optical mode. Both tines (blue and yellow dots) are distinguishable and the gap region (orange dot) shows negligible perturbation. b, Cavity transmission spectra at select points in a along with a far-field spectrum. The dashed line corresponds to the fixed detuning used in a. The small differences in the gap spectrum and the far-field spectrum are attributed to slow thermal drifts between measurements.

  2. Extended Data Fig. 2 Photocurrent mapping of the optical modes.

    a, Principle of the near-field photocurrent mapping of the cavity field. The suspended CNT is positioned close to the optical cavity and slowly scanned across the perimeter of the optical cavity. Modes 1 and 2 are two standing waves spatially π out of phase. b, Photocurrent signal (Iphoto) from the CNT as the laser wavelength is rapidly swept across the two optical standing wave modes. The alternating photocurrent strength corresponds to the spatial geometry of the two optical standing waves.

  3. Extended Data Fig. 3 Optical polarizability measurements.

    a, Schematic of the measurement. The CNT is touched to the surface of the cavity (dotted line) and then the tweezers are moved downward in the plane of the cavity, moving the CNT over several optical nodes. b, The resulting transmission data as a function of displacement (plotted from black to red). Resonance spectra are plotted as the difference between the off-resonance power (P0) and the transmitted power (Ptrans) and are displaced for clarity. c, Relationship between shifts in damping γ1 and frequency f1 (referenced to their respective far-field quantities γ01 and f01) for the higher-frequency mode. d, Relationship between the damping rates of both cavities. Vertical and horizontal lines denote the far-field damping rates γ01 and γ02 respectively and the blue spectra correspond to the maximum damping condition for each mode. The linear fit specifies the maximum damping rate γ ≈ 450 MHz and is due to the orthogonality of the two spatial modes.

  4. Extended Data Fig. 4 Broadband analysis of pseudo-periodic resonances.

    a, Spectrogram of 145 ms of continuous data, revealing correlations of amplitude and frequency variation among several resonance modes. The power spectrum is plotted on the right with modes labelled based on analysis in Supplementary section 5. b, Correlations between resonance mode amplitudes A and frequency shifts Δf. The frequency shifts of \({f}_{3z}\) is plotted above (blue), with dotted lines corresponding to local minima. The (normalized) amplitudes of five modes are plotted below.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Discussions 1–16, and Supplementary Figures 1–17. The discussions detail: (1) photocurrent mapping of cavity fields, (2) simulations of optical cavity field, (3) measurements of CNT polarizability, (4) electrostatic tuning of CNT resonances, (5) optical tomography of mechanical resonances, (6) simulations of mechanical resonances, (7) spectrographic analysis of CNT time traces, (8) measurements of nonlinearity in thermally driven resonances, (9) theory of optical mode perturbation, (10) calculation of optical scattering length, (11) calculation of optomechanical displacement sensitivity, (12) calibration of displacement signal, (13) evidence that spectral diffusion is intrinsic to CNT motion, (14) analysis of spectral diffusion, (15) additional simulation data and (16) analysis of CNT thermal statistics.

  2. Supplementary Video 1

    Audio representation of thermally driven spectral diffusion in a CNT. The measured real-time time trace (a segment of Fig. 3 data) is slowed down 1,300 times to form an audible signal.

About this article

Publication history




Issue Date




By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.