Letter | Published:

Realization of a three-dimensional photonic topological insulator

Naturevolume 565pages622626 (2019) | Download Citation


Confining photons in a finite volume is highly desirable in modern photonic devices, such as waveguides, lasers and cavities. Decades ago, this motivated the study and application of photonic crystals, which have a photonic bandgap that forbids light propagation in all directions1,2,3. Recently, inspired by the discoveries of topological insulators4,5, the confinement of photons with topological protection has been demonstrated in two-dimensional (2D) photonic structures known as photonic topological insulators6,7,8, with promising applications in topological lasers9,10 and robust optical delay lines11. However, a fully three-dimensional (3D) topological photonic bandgap has not been achieved. Here we experimentally demonstrate a 3D photonic topological insulator with an extremely wide (more than 25 per cent bandwidth) 3D topological bandgap. The composite material (metallic patterns on printed circuit boards) consists of split-ring resonators (classical electromagnetic artificial atoms) with strong magneto-electric coupling and behaves like a ‘weak’ topological insulator (that is, with an even number of surface Dirac cones), or a stack of 2D quantum spin Hall insulators. Using direct field measurements, we map out both the gapped bulk band structure and the Dirac-like dispersion of the photonic surface states, and demonstrate robust photonic propagation along a non-planar surface. Our work extends the family of 3D topological insulators from fermions to bosons and paves the way for applications in topological photonic cavities, circuits and lasers in 3D geometries.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Yablonovitch, E. Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2059–2062 (1987).

  2. 2.

    John, S. Strong localization of photons in certain disordered dielectric superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2486–2489 (1987).

  3. 3.

    Yablonovitch, E., Gmitter, T. & Leung, K. Photonic band structure: the face-centered-cubic case employing nonspherical atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2295–2298 (1991).

  4. 4.

    Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010).

  5. 5.

    Qi, X.-L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110 (2011).

  6. 6.

    Lu, L., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljačić, M. Topological photonics. Nat. Photon. 8, 821–829 (2014).

  7. 7.

    Khanikaev, A. B. & Shvets, G. Two-dimensional topological photonics. Nat. Photon. 11, 763–773 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Ozawa, T. et al. Topological photonics. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04173 (2018).

  9. 9.

    Bahari, B. et al. Nonreciprocal lasing in topological cavities of arbitrary geometries. Science 358, 636–640 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Bandres, M. A. et al. Topological insulator laser: experiments. Science 359, eaar4005 (2018).

  11. 11.

    Hafezi, M., Demler, E. A., Lukin, M. D. & Taylor, J. M. Robust optical delay lines with topological protection. Nat. Phys. 7, 907–912 (2011).

  12. 12.

    Lin, S.-y. et al. A three-dimensional photonic crystal operating at infrared wavelengths. Nature 394, 251–253 (1998).

  13. 13.

    Rinne, S. A., García-Santamaría, F. & Braun, P. V. Embedded cavities and waveguides in three-dimensional silicon photonic crystals. Nat. Photon. 2, 52–56 (2008).

  14. 14.

    Wang, Z., Chong, Y., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljačić, M. Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states. Nature 461, 772–775 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Khanikaev, A. B. et al. Photonic topological insulators. Nat. Mater. 12, 233–239 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Lu, L. et al. Experimental observation of Weyl points. Science 349, 622–624 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Noh, J. et al. Experimental observation of optical Weyl points and Fermi arc-like surface states. Nat. Phys. 13, 611–617 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Yang, B. et al. Ideal Weyl points and helicoid surface states in artificial photonic crystal structures. Science 359, 1013–1016 (2018).

  19. 19.

    Yannopapas, V. Gapless surface states in a lattice of coupled cavities: a photonic analog of topological crystalline insulators. Phys. Rev. B 84, 195126 (2011).

  20. 20.

    Lu, L. et al. Symmetry-protected topological photonic crystal in three dimensions. Nat. Phys. 12, 337–340 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Slobozhanyuk, A. et al. Three-dimensional all-dielectric photonic topological insulator. Nat. Photon. 11, 130–136 (2017).

  22. 22.

    Lin, Q., Sun, X.-Q., Xiao, M., Zhang, S.-C. & Fan, S. Constructing three-dimensional photonic topological insulator using two-dimensional ring resonator lattice with a synthetic frequency dimension. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.02597 (2018).

  23. 23.

    Ochiai, T. Gapless surface states originating from accidentally degenerate quadratic band touching in a three-dimensional tetragonal photonic crystal. Phys. Rev. A 96, 043842 (2017).

  24. 24.

    Fu, L., Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Topological insulators in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007).

  25. 25.

    Mong, R. S., Bardarson, J. H. & Moore, J. E. Quantum transport and two-parameter scaling at the surface of a weak topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 076804 (2012).

  26. 26.

    Ringel, Z., Kraus, Y. E. & Stern, A. Strong side of weak topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 86, 045102 (2012).

  27. 27.

    Pendry, J. B., Holden, A. J., Robbins, D. & Stewart, W. Magnetism from conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 47, 2075–2084 (1999).

  28. 28.

    Barik, S. et al. A topological quantum optics interface. Science 359, 666–668 (2018).

  29. 29.

    Cheng, X. et al. Robust reconfigurable electromagnetic pathways within a photonic topological insulator. Nat. Mater. 15, 542–548 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Marqués, R., Medina, F. & Rafii-El-Idrissi, R. Role of bianisotropy in negative permeability and left-handed metamaterials. Phys. Rev. B 65, 144440 (2002).

  31. 31.

    Ma, T., Khanikaev, A. B., Mousavi, S. H. & Shvets, G. Guiding electromagnetic waves around sharp corners: topologically protected photonic transport in metawaveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 127401 (2015).

  32. 32.

    Burckel, D. B. et al. Micrometer-scale cubic unit cell 3D metamaterial layers. Adv. Mater. 22, 5053–5057 (2010).

  33. 33.

    Süsstrunk, R. & Huber, S. D. Observation of phononic helical edge states in a mechanical topological insulator. Science 349, 47–50 (2015).

  34. 34.

    Guo, Q. et al. Three dimensional photonic Dirac points in metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 213901 (2017).

  35. 35.

    Wu, L.-H. & Hu, X. Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 223901 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Yves, S. et al. Crystalline metamaterials for topological properties at subwavelength scales. Nat. Commun. 8, 16023 (2017).

Download references


We thank Q. Yan at Zhejiang University, L. Lu at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and J. C. W. Song at Nanyang Technological University for discussions. The work at Zhejiang University was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant numbers 61625502, 61574127, 61601408, 61775193 and 11704332, the ZJNSF under grant number LY17F010008, the Top-Notch Young Talents Program of China, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and the Innovation Joint Research Center for Cyber-Physical-Society System. Y.C. and B.Z. acknowledge the support of Singapore Ministry of Education under grant numbers MOE2015-T2-1-070, MOE2015-T2-2-008, MOE2016-T3-1-006 and Tier 1 RG174/16 (S). Y.Y. and R.S. acknowledge the support of the Singapore Ministry of Education under grant number MOE2015-T2-2-103.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks J. Bravo-Abad and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information


  1. State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation, The Electromagnetics Academy at Zhejiang University, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    • Yihao Yang
    • , Li Zhang
    • , Mengjia He
    •  & Hongsheng Chen
  2. Key Laboratory of Micro-Nano Electronics and Smart System of Zhejiang Province, College of Information Science and Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    • Yihao Yang
    • , Li Zhang
    • , Mengjia He
    •  & Hongsheng Chen
  3. Division of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    • Yihao Yang
    • , Zhen Gao
    • , Haoran Xue
    • , Zhaoju Yang
    • , Ranjan Singh
    • , Yidong Chong
    •  & Baile Zhang
  4. Centre for Disruptive Photonic Technologies, The Photonics Institute, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    • Yihao Yang
    • , Zhen Gao
    • , Haoran Xue
    • , Zhaoju Yang
    • , Ranjan Singh
    • , Yidong Chong
    •  & Baile Zhang


  1. Search for Yihao Yang in:

  2. Search for Zhen Gao in:

  3. Search for Haoran Xue in:

  4. Search for Li Zhang in:

  5. Search for Mengjia He in:

  6. Search for Zhaoju Yang in:

  7. Search for Ranjan Singh in:

  8. Search for Yidong Chong in:

  9. Search for Baile Zhang in:

  10. Search for Hongsheng Chen in:


Y.Y. initiated the original idea. Y.Y., B.Z. and H.C. designed the experiment. Y.Y., Z.G., M.H. and L.Z. fabricated samples. Y.Y. and Z.G. carried out the measurement and analysed data. Y.Y., H.X., L.Z. and Z.Y. performed simulations. Y.Y., H.X., B.Z., M.H., Z.Y., H.C. and Y.C. provided the theoretical explanations. R.S. assisted in part of the experiment. Y.Y., Y.C., B.Z. and H.C. supervised the project.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhen Gao or Baile Zhang or Hongsheng Chen.

Extended data figures and tables

  1. Extended Data Fig. 1 Bandstructure evolutions.

    a, Hexagonal unit cell and band diagram of the 3D photonic crystal. The green and yellow dots indicate the 3D Dirac points. The plots on the right show the 2D projection of the 3D Dirac cones in the vicinity of the K and K′ points. bg, Hexagonal unit cell and bandstructures for different l1. Here, a is the lattice constant in the x–y plane and pz is the periodicity in the z direction; the ratio of ttop to l1 remains unchanged, while l1 is gradually compressed to zero. The blue regions represent the first (primary) bandgaps.

  2. Extended Data Fig. 2 Modal analysis.

    a, Modal analysis for 3D Dirac points. Current distributions of four degenerate modes near the 3D Dirac point marked by the green dot in Extended Data Fig. 1a. The dashed arrows represent the current directions, and e+ (e) and m+ (m) represent the even (odd) transverse-electric and transverse-magnetic modes, respectively. Here, the even and odd modes are classified by the mirror plane indicated by the red dotted lines. b, Modal analysis for the 3D photonic topological insulator with a small perturbation. The first row shows the current distributions of the hybrid modes at the lower bands (green dot in Extended Data Fig. 1b) and upper bands (yellow dot in Extended Data Fig. 1b) near the K valley. The dashed arrows represent the current directions. The previous four degenerate modes hybridize pairwise and split into the lower and upper bands, respectively. The second and third rows show the cross-sectional polarization configurations of electric (red) and magnetic (black) fields, near the K and K′ valleys. The phase difference between electric and magnetic dipole components is 0 or π. c, Modal analysis for the wide-gap 3D photonic topological insulator. The first row shows the current distributions of the lower-band modes (green dot in Extended Data Fig. 1g) near the K valley. The dashed arrows represent the current directions. The second and third rows show the cross-sectional polarization configurations of electric (red) and magnetic (black) fields, near the K and K′ valleys. The phase difference between electric and magnetic dipole components is 0 or π.

  3. Extended Data Fig. 3 Spin–momentum locking of topological surface states.

    a, Schematic of the domain wall. The openings of the SRRs in the left and right of the domains are opposite. b, Spin–momentum locking at an isofrequency (4.8-GHz) contour of the surface Dirac cone. On the left is a dispersion diagram of the surface Dirac cone. The black ring indicates the isofrequency contour and the red arrows illustrate the spin–momentum locking at 4.8 GHz. On the right are schematic and numerical results of the polarization configurations of electric (red) and magnetic (black) fields inside the cross-sections of the SRRs (triangles), at eight points marked on the isofrequency contour by green dots and numbers. The phase difference between the electric and magnetic components, Δϕ, varies from 0 to 2π along the contour. The black ring and red dot represent the isofrequency contour and surface Dirac point, respectively.

  4. Extended Data Fig. 4 Simulated field distributions near a sharply twisted 2D domain wall.

    a, Schematic of the twisted domain wall: the red and green triangles are SRRs oriented upwards and downwards, respectively. bf, Distributions of the electric field intensity across the domain wall, with different values of kz.

  5. Extended Data Fig. 5 Measured field distributions and the corresponding dispersion.

    a, Measured electric field distributions in the sample of a straight domain wall in the x–y plane at different heights of z at 4.7 GHz. The black dashed line represents the position of the domain wall; the green dashed line denotes the position of the cross-section shown in b. b, Field distributions and normalized electric energy density in the yz plane with x = 150 mm. The dots and dashed line represent experimental data and exponential fitting, respectively. c, Surface dispersion in momentum space, obtained by Fourier transforming the real-space complex field distributions on the domain wall.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text sections S1–S5, Supplementary Figures 1–3 and Supplementary References. The Supplementary Text includes the derivation of the effective Hamiltonian at K (K′) valley of 3D photonic TI with k·p theory, Berry curvatures, a brief introduction of bi-anisotropy, theoretical derivation of spin–momentum locking and details of the twisted domain wall measurement

About this article

Publication history




Issue Date



Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.