Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Industrial and agricultural ammonia point sources exposed

Abstract

Through its important role in the formation of particulate matter, atmospheric ammonia affects air quality and has implications for human health and life expectancy1,2. Excess ammonia in the environment also contributes to the acidification and eutrophication of ecosystems3,4,5 and to climate change6. Anthropogenic emissions dominate natural ones and mostly originate from agricultural, domestic and industrial activities7. However, the total ammonia budget and the attribution of emissions to specific sources remain highly uncertain across different spatial scales7,8,9. Here we identify, categorize and quantify the world’s ammonia emission hotspots using a high-resolution map of atmospheric ammonia obtained from almost a decade of daily IASI satellite observations. We report 248 hotspots with diameters smaller than 50 kilometres, which we associate with either a single point source or a cluster of agricultural and industrial point sources—with the exception of one hotspot, which can be traced back to a natural source. The state-of-the-art EDGAR emission inventory10 mostly agrees with satellite-derived emission fluxes within a factor of three for larger regions. However, it does not adequately represent the majority of point sources that we identified and underestimates the emissions of two-thirds of them by at least one order of magnitude. Industrial emitters in particular are often found to be displaced or missing. Our results suggest that it is necessary to completely revisit the emission inventories of anthropogenic ammonia sources and to account for the rapid evolution of such sources over time. This will lead to better health and environmental impact assessments of atmospheric ammonia and the implementation of suitable nitrogen management strategies.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: IASI nine-year oversampled average, hotspots and source regions.
Fig. 2: Examples of industrial and agricultural point sources.
Fig. 3: Satellite-derived emission fluxes versus a bottom-up emission inventory.
Fig. 4: Examples of satellite-based ammonia emission trends.

Data availability

The NH3 map is available in NetCDF and KMZ formats. The latter file includes the identified hotspots and source regions and is provided in the Supplementary Information. The supplement also includes the 28 hotspot illustrations. The NetCDF file of the NH3 map and the reanalysed IASI NH3 dataset (ANNI-NH3-v2.1R-I) described in Methods are available from the PANGAEA repository (https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.894736); more recent versions of IASI NH3 datasets are available from the AERIS data infrastructure (http://iasi.aeris-data.fr). The NH3 product from IASI will also be operationally distributed by EUMETCast, under the auspices of the EUMETSAT Atmospheric Monitoring Satellite Application Facility (AC-SAF; http://ac-saf.eumetsat.int).

References

  1. 1.

    Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D. & Pozzer, A. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525, 367–371 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bauer, S. E., Tsigaridis, K. & Miller, R. Significant atmospheric aerosol pollution caused by world food cultivation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 5394–5400 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Galloway, J. et al. The nitrogen cascade. Bioscience 53, 341–356 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bobbink, R. et al. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 20, 30–59 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Paerl, H. W., Gardner, W. S., McCarthy, M. J., Peierls, B. L. & Wilhelm, S. W. Algal blooms: noteworthy nitrogen. Science 346, 175 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Shindell, D. T. et al. Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions. Science 326, 716–718 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sutton, M. A. et al. Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and deposition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20130166 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Reis, S., Pinder, R. W., Zhang, M., Lijie, G. & Sutton, M. A. Reactive nitrogen in atmospheric emission inventories. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 7657–7677 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Behera, S., Sharma, M., Aneja, V. & Balasubramanian, R. Ammonia in the atmosphere: a review on emission sources, atmospheric chemistry and deposition on terrestrial bodies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 20, 8092–8131 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), release version 4.3.1 http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=431 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Huang, X. et al. A high-resolution ammonia emission inventory in China. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 26, GB1030 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Meng, W. et al. Improvement of a global high-resolution ammonia emission inventory for combustion and industrial sources with new data from the residential and transportation sectors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 2821–2829 (2017).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Dentener, F., Hurtmans, D. & Coheur, P.-F. Global ammonia distribution derived from infrared satellite observations. Nat. Geosci. 2, 479–483 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Shephard, M. W. et al. TES ammonia retrieval strategy and global observations of the spatial and seasonal variability of ammonia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 10743–10763 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Van Damme, M. et al. Global distributions, time series and error characterization of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) from IASI satellite observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 2905–2922 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Shephard, M. W. & Cady-Pereira, K. E. Cross-track infrared sounder (CrIS) satellite observations of tropospheric ammonia. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8, 1323–1336 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Warner, J. X. et al. Increased atmospheric ammonia over the world’s major agricultural areas detected from space. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 2875–2884 (2017).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Streets, D. G. et al. Emissions estimation from satellite retrievals: a review of current capability. Atmos. Environ. 77, 1011–1042 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhu, L. et al. Constraining U.S. ammonia emissions using TES remote sensing observations and the GEOS-Chem adjoint model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 3355–3368 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Van Damme, M. et al. Evaluating 4 years of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) over Europe using IASI satellite observations and LOTOS-EUROS model results. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 9549–9566 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Whitburn, S. et al. A flexible and robust neural network IASI-NH3 retrieval algorithm. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 6581–6599 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    IFDC. Worldwide Ammonia Capacity Listing by Plant. Report No. IFDC-FSR-10 (IFDC, 2016).

  23. 23.

    Worldwide Syngas Database www.globalsyngas.org (2018).

  24. 24.

    Yasar, S., Orhan, H. & Erensayin, C. Examining the nutritional and production characteristics of egg-farms in Basmakci County in Turkey. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 59, 249–259 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Theobald, M. R. et al. Ammonia emissions from a Cape fur seal colony, Cape Cross, Namibia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L03812 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Riddick, S. et al. High temporal resolution modelling of environmentally-dependent seabird ammonia emissions: description and testing of the guano model. Atmos. Environ. 161, 48–60 (2017).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Uematsu, M. et al. Enhancement of primary productivity in the western North Pacific caused by the eruption of the Miyake-jima Volcano. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L06106 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Clerbaux, C. et al. Monitoring of atmospheric composition using the thermal infrared IASI/MetOp sounder. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 6041–6054 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Clarisse, L. et al. Satellite monitoring of ammonia: a case study of the San Joaquin Valley. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D13302 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Van Damme, M. et al. Version 2 of the IASI NH3 neural network retrieval algorithm: near-real-time and reanalysed datasets. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 10, 4905–4914 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Walker, J. C., Dudhia, A. & Carboni, E. An effective method for the detection of trace species demonstrated using the MetOp Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 4, 1567–1580 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    August, T. et al. IASI on Metop-A: Operational Level 2 retrievals after five years in orbit. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 113, 1340–1371 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Van Damme, M. et al. Towards validation of ammonia (NH3) measurements from the IASI satellite. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8, 1575–1591 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Dammers, E. et al. An evaluation of IASI-NH3 with ground-based Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 10351–10368 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Warner, J. X., Wei, Z., Strow, L. L., Dickerson, R. R. & Nowak, J. B. The global tropospheric ammonia distribution as seen in the 13-year AIRS measurement record. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 5467–5479 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wenig, M. O. et al. Validation of OMI tropospheric NO2 column densities using direct-Sun mode Brewer measurements at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D16S45 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Fioletov, V. E., McLinden, C. A., Krotkov, N., Moran, M. D. & Yang, K. Estimation of SO2 emissions using OMI retrievals. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L21811 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., de Foy, B. & Krotkov, N. A. Ozone Monitoring Instrument observations of interannual increases in SO2 emissions from Indian coal-fired power plants during 2005–2012. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 13993–14000 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Pommier, M., McLinden, C. A. & Deeter, M. Relative changes in CO emissions over megacities based on observations from space. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3766–3771 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zhu, L. et al. Anthropogenic emissions of highly reactive volatile organic compounds in eastern Texas inferred from oversampling of satellite (OMI) measurements of HCHO columns. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 114004 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    de Foy, B., Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., Lamsal, L. N. & Duncan, B. N. Estimates of power plant NOx emissions and lifetimes from OMI NO2 satellite retrievals. Atmos. Environ. 116, 1–11 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Fioletov, V. E., McLinden, C. A., Krotkov, N. & Li, C. Lifetimes and emissions of SO2 from point sources estimated from OMI. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 1969–1976 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Krotkov, N. A. et al. Aura OMI observations of regional SO2 and NO2 pollution changes from 2005 to 2015. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 4605–4629 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    McLinden, C. A. et al. Space-based detection of missing sulfur dioxide sources of global air pollution. Nat. Geosci. 9, 496–500 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Marsouin, A. & Brunel, P. AAPP Documentation, Annex of Scientific Description, AAPP Navigation. Report No. NWPSAF-MF-UD-005 (EUMETSAT, 2011).

  47. 47.

    Giglio, L., Schroeder, W. & Justice, C. O. The collection 6 MODIS active fire detection algorithm and fire products. Remote Sens. Environ. 178, 31–41 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Whitburn, S. et al. Ammonia emissions in tropical biomass burning regions: Comparison between satellite-derived emissions and bottom-up fire inventories. Atmos. Environ. 121, 42–54 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Whitburn, S. et al. Doubling of annual ammonia emissions from the peat fires in Indonesia during the 2015 El Niño. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 11007–11014 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bravi, M. & Basosi, R. Environmental impact of electricity from selected geothermal power plants in Italy. J. Clean. Prod. 66, 301–308 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wang, S. et al. Atmospheric ammonia and its impacts on regional air quality over the megacity of Shanghai, China. Sci. Rep. 5, 15842 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Roe, S. M. et al. Estimating Ammonia Emissions from Anthropogenic Nonagricultural Sources. Draft Final Report (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2004).

  53. 53.

    Theys, N. et al. Volcanic SO2 fluxes derived from satellite data: a survey using OMI, GOME-2, IASI and MODIS. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 5945–5968 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Jacob, D. J. Introduction to Atmospheric Chemistry (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Zhu, L. et al. Global evaluation of ammonia bidirectional exchange and livestock diurnal variation schemes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 12823–12843 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    de Foy, B., Wilkins, J. L., Lu, Z., Streets, D. G. & Duncan, B. N. Model evaluation of methods for estimating surface emissions and chemical lifetimes from satellite data. Atmos. Environ. 98, 66–77 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Crippa, M. et al. Forty years of improvements in European air quality: regional policy-industry interactions with global impacts. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 3825–3841 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

IASI is a joint mission of EUMETSAT (European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites) and the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES, France). The research in Belgium was funded by F.R.S.-FNRS and the Belgian State Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs (Prodex arrangement IASI.FLOW). L.C. is a Research Associate (Chercheur Qualifié) with the Belgian F.R.S.-FNRS. C.C. is grateful to CNES for scientific collaboration and financial support. We thank M. Zondlo for discussions and R. Astoreca for assistance with the identification of certain hotspots. We gratefully acknowledge the Nederlandse Organisatie voor toegepast-natuurwetenschappelijk onderzoek (TNO) for the LOTOS-EUROS data used in the uncertainty analysis presented in the Supplementary Information.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks F. Boersma and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.V.D. and L.C. obtained the first hyperresolved maps of NH3 and performed the identification, classification and quantification of the sources, wrote the manuscript and prepared the figures. L.C., M.V.D., S.W. and J.H.-L. were responsible for the development of the retrieval algorithm and the processing of the IASI NH3 dataset. D.H. was responsible for the development of the forward model. C.C. and P.-F.C. contributed to the text and interpretation of the results and supervised the research.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Martin Van Damme or Lieven Clarisse.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Source areas and hotspot locations.

Global nine-year NH3 average (in molecules per square centimetre) with identified hotspots, their associated flux estimates (black circles), and source areas (white rectangles). In total 248 hotspots and 178 source areas are indicated (see Supplementary Information for details). The locations and names of the hotspots discussed in the main text are also provided. The largest average NH3 column is found over the Indus Valley (Pakistan) with a value of 1.1 × 1017 molecules cm−2.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Satellite footprint averaging.

Example of two days (20 and 21 July 2016) of IASI/Metop-A morning NH3 observations (in molecules per square centimetre) over the Po Valley. The elliptical footprints of IASI are averaged on a 0.01° × 0.01° high-resolution grid and weighted by the inverse of their footprint area. Map data from Google Earth and Landsat/Copernicus.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Binned and oversampled averages over the Nile Delta and Valley.

The right panel demonstrates the oversampled average (on a 0.01° × 0.01° grid; maximum value of 3.1 × 1016 molecules cm−2); the left panel shows the traditional binned average (on a 0.25° × 0.25° grid; maximum value of 2.2 × 1016 molecules cm−2) of IASI/Metop-A morning NH3 observations from 2008 to 2016 (in molecules per square centimetre; 12 × 12 km2 at nadir); see Methods for details. The increase in resolution allows the identification of two point sources in the north of the Gulf of Suez, Ain Sukhna (1) and Al-Adabiya (2), which cannot be singled out with a more traditional gridding approach.

Extended Data Fig. 4 IASI NH3 yearly distributions.

Yearly NH3 maps (in molecules per square centimetre) over several hotspots: (from top to bottom) Marvdasht (Iran), Ferghana (Uzbekistan), Torreón (Mexico), Secunda (South Africa), Nicaro (Cuba; blue in Fig. 4), Bacau (Romania; orange in Fig. 4), Alto Laran district (Peru; green in Fig. 4), Anju (North Korea; purple in Fig. 4) and Wucaiwan (China; yellow in Fig. 4). The 2008 and 2009 distributions are noisier owing to reduced data availability (see Methods). The Wucaiwan industrial point source can be seen to appear in Landsat-5 (2008–2009), -7 (2010–2012) and -8 (2013–2016) images (bottom panels). Map data from Google Earth and Landsat/Copernicus.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains: Hotspot illustrations – a detailed six-panel figure is provided for each of the 28 hotspots (their location is indicated in Figure SI1) mentioned in the paper; NH3 lifetime table listing ammonia lifetime estimates reported in the literature; Uncertainty analyses of the different factors (data sampling, vertical profile, diurnal variability –Figure SI2– and background correction –Figure SI3–) that contribute to the overall uncertainty in the satellite-based NH3 emission estimates (Table SI2 and Figure SI4) and Supplementary References.

Supplementary Data

Catalogue of ammonia hotspots and regions - identified, categorized and quantified NH3 hotspots and source regions. For the hotspots, the file includes latitude (LAT, degree north), longitude (LON, degree east), name, province or state, country, source, satellite-based emission flux (IASI, kg/s), EDGAR emission flux from industry (EDGAR IND, kg/s), EDGAR emission flux from agriculture (EDGAR AGR, kg/s), area of the box considered (AREA, km2) and satellite based emission fluxes per hectare and per year (IASI, kg/ha/yr); for the source regions, the file includes latitude limits (MIN LAT and MAX LAT, degree north), longitude limits (MIN LON and MAX LON, degree east), name, province or state, country, source, satellite-based emission flux (IASI, kg/s), EDGAR total emission flux (EDGAR, kg/s), area of the region (AREA, km2) and satellite based emission fluxes per hectare and per year (IASI, kg/ha/yr).

Supplementary Data

Ammonia map and catalogue (KMZ). Global 9-year average of the IASI NH3 satellite observations at a hyperfine resolution (0.01°×0.01°) in KMZ format. The map has been saturated to 2∙1016 molec/cm2. The “IASI_NH3_9yr_AM_2e16_KMZ.zip” file includes a KMZ file that can be directly opened in Google Earth (once uncompressed) and consists of the NH3 map, the identified hotspots (industrial –NH3_hotspots_ind−, agricultural −NH3_hotspots_agr−, natural −NH3_hotspots_nat− and not determined −NH3_hotspots_nd−) and the source regions (NH3_regions).

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Whitburn, S. et al. Industrial and agricultural ammonia point sources exposed. Nature 564, 99–103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0747-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI)
  • Emission Database For Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR)
  • Emission Flux
  • Emission Inventory
  • Beech Island

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing