Letter | Published:

Spatially resolved rotation of the broad-line region of a quasar at sub-parsec scale

Naturevolume 563pages657660 (2018) | Download Citation


The broadening of atomic emission lines by high-velocity motion of gas near accreting supermassive black holes is an observational hallmark of quasars1. Observations of broad emission lines could potentially constrain the mechanism for transporting gas inwards through accretion disks or outwards through winds2. The size of regions for which broad emission lines are observed (broad-line regions) has been estimated by measuring the delay in light travel time between the variable brightness of the accretion disk  continuum and the emission lines3—a method known as reverberation mapping. In some models the emission lines arise from a continuous outflow4, whereas in others they arise from orbiting gas clouds5. Directly imaging such regions has not hitherto been possible because of their small angular size (less than 10−4 arcseconds3,6). Here we report a spatial offset (with a spatial resolution of 10−5 arcseconds, or about 0.03 parsecs for a distance of 550 million parsecs) between the red and blue photo-centres of the broad Paschen-α line of the quasar 3C 273 perpendicular to the direction of its radio jet. This spatial offset corresponds to a gradient in the velocity of the gas and thus implies that the gas is orbiting the central supermassive black hole. The data are well fitted by a broad-line-region model of a thick disk of gravitationally bound material orbiting a black hole of 3 × 108 solar masses. We infer a disk radius of 150 light days; a radius of 100–400 light days was found previously using reverberation mapping7,8,9. The rotation axis of the disk aligns in inclination and position angle with the radio jet. Our results support the methods that are often used to estimate the masses of accreting supermassive black holes and to study their evolution over cosmic time.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data were obtained at the VLTI of the European Southern Observatory (ESO), Paranal, Chile, and are available on the ESO archive (http://archive.eso.org/eso/eso_archive_main.html) under programme IDs 099.B-0606, 0100.B-0582 and 0101.B-0255.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Schmidt, M. 3C 273: a star-like object with large red-shift. Nature 197, 1040 (1963).

  2. 2.

    Krolik, J. H. Active Galactic Nuclei: From the Central Black Hole to the Galactic Environment (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2001).

  3. 3.

    Blandford, R. D. & McKee, C. F. Reverberation mapping of the emission line regions of Seyfert galaxies and quasars. Astrophys. J. 255, 419–439 (1982).

  4. 4.

    Chiang, J. & Murray, N. Reverberation mapping and the disk-wind model of the broad-line region. Astrophys. J. 466, 704–712 (1996).

  5. 5.

    Eracleous, M. & Halpern, J. P. Double-peaked emission lines in active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 90, 1–30 (1994).

  6. 6.

    Elvis, M. & Karovska, M. Quasar parallax: a method for determining direct geometrical distances to quasars. Astrophys. J. 581, L67–L70 (2002).

  7. 7.

    Kaspi, S. et al. Reverberation measurements for 17 quasars and the size-mass-luminosity relations in active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 533, 631–649 (2000).

  8. 8.

    Peterson, B. M. et al. Central masses and broad-line region sizes of active galactic nuclei. II. A homogeneous analysis of a large reverberation-mapping database. Astrophys. J. 613, 682–699 (2004).

  9. 9.

    Zu, Y., Kochanek, C. S. & Peterson, B. M. An alternative approach to measuring reverberation lags in active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 735, 80 (2011).

  10. 10.

    GRAVITY Collaboration. First light for GRAVITY: phase referencing optical interferometry for the Very Large Telescope Interferometer. Astron. Astrophys. 602, A94 (2017).

  11. 11.

    Bailey, J. Detection of pre-main-sequence binaries using spectro-astrometry. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 301, 161–167 (1998).

  12. 12.

    Petrov, R. G. et al. VLTI/AMBER differential interferometry of the broad-line region of the quasar 3C273. Proc. SPIE 8445, 84450W (2012).

  13. 13.

    Röser, H.-J. & Meisenheimer, K. The synchrotron light from the jet of 3C 273. Astron. Astrophys. 252, 458–474 (1991).

  14. 14.

    Pancoast, A., Brewer, B. J. & Treu, T. Modelling reverberation mapping data – I. Improved geometric and dynamical models and comparison with cross-correlation results. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 3055–3072 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Rakshit, S., Petrov, R. G., Meilland, A. & Hönig, S. F. Differential interferometry of QSO broad-line regions – I. Improving the reverberation mapping model fits and black hole mass estimates. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, 2420–2436 (2015).

  16. 16.

    Foreman-Mackey, D. emcee: the MCMC hammer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 125, 306–312 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Lobanov, A. et al. A cosmic double helix in the archetypical quasar 3C273. Science 294, 128–131 (2001).

  18. 18.

    Savolainen, T. et al. Multifrequency VLBA monitoring of 3C 273 during the INTEGRAL Campaign in 2003 I. Kinematics of the parsec scale jet from 43 GHz data. Astron. Astrophys. 446, 71–85 (2006).

  19. 19.

    Jorstad, S. G. et al. Kinematics of parsec-scale jets of gamma-ray blazars at 43 GHz within the VLBA-BU-BLAZAR program. Astrophys. J. 846, 98 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Kishimoto, M. et al. The innermost dusty structure in active galactic nuclei as probed by the Keck interferometer. Astron. Astrophys. 527, A121 (2011).

  21. 21.

    Netzer, H. Revisiting the unified model of active galactic nuclei. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53, 365–408 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Baldwin, J. A. Luminosity indicators in the spectra of quasi-stellar objects. Astrophys. J. 214, 679–684 (1977).

  23. 23.

    Pancoast, A. et al. Modelling reverberation mapping data – II. Dynamical modelling of the Lick AGN monitoring project 2008 data set. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 3073–3091 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Grier, A. et al. The structure of the broad-line region in active galactic nuclei. II. Dynamical modeling of data from the AGN10 reverberation mapping campaign. Astrophys. J. 849, 146 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Ferrarese, L. & Merritt, D. A fundamental relation between supermassive black holes and their host galaxies. Astrophys. J. 539, L9–L12 (2000).

  26. 26.

    Gebhardt, K. et al. A relationship between nuclear black hole mass and galaxy velocity dispersion. Astrophys. J. 539, L13–L16 (2000).

  27. 27.

    Bentz, M. C. & Sarah, K. The AGN black hole mass database. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 127, 67–73 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Begelman, M. C. & Silk, J. Magnetically elevated accretion discs in active galactic nuclei: broad emission-line regions and associated star formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 464, 2311–2317 (2017).

  29. 29.

    Czerny, B. et al. Failed radiatively accelerated dusty outflow model of the broad line region in active galactic nuclei. I. Analytical solution. Astrophys. J. 846, 154 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Mangham, S. W. et al. The reverberation signatures of rotating disc winds in active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 4788–4801 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Lapeyrere, V. et al. GRAVITY data reduction software. Proc. SPIE 9146, 91462D (2014).

  32. 32.

    Tatulli, E. et al. Interferometric data reduction with AMBER/VLTI. Principle, estimators, and illustration. Astron. Astrophys. 464, 29–42 (2007).

  33. 33.

    Millour, F. et al. AMBER closure and differential phases: accuracy and calibration with a beam commutation, optical and infrared interferometry. Proc. SPIE 7013, 70131G (2008).

  34. 34.

    Rayner, J. T., Cushing, M. C. & Vacca, W. D. The Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) spectral library: cool stars. Astrophys. J. 185, 289–432 (2009).

  35. 35.

    Lachaume, R. On marginally resolved objects in optical interferometry. Astron. Astrophys. 400, 795–803 (2003).

  36. 36.

    Waisberg, I. et al. Submilliarcsecond optical interferometry of the high-mass X-ray binary BP Cru with VLTI/GRAVITY. Astrophys. J. 844, 72 (2017).

  37. 37.

    Goad, M. R., Korista, K. T. & Ruff, A. J. The broad emission-line region: the confluence of the outer accretion disc with the inner edge of the dusty torus. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 426, 3086–3111 (2012).

  38. 38.

    Bentz, M. C. et al. The low-luminosity end of the radius-luminosity relationship for active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 767, 149 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Du, P. et al. Supermassive black holes with high accretion rates in active galactic nuclei IX. 10 new observations of reverberation mapping and shortened Hβ lags. Astrophys. J. 856, 6 (2018).

  40. 40.

    Grier, C. J. et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey reverberation mapping project: Hα and Hβ reverberation measurements from first-year spectroscopy and photometry. Astrophys. J. 851, 21 (2017).

Download references


We are grateful to the ESO and the ESO/Paranal staff, and to the many scientific and technical staff members in our institutions who helped to make GRAVITY a reality. GRAVITY was developed in a collaboration by the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, LESIA of Paris Observatory/CNRS/Sorbonne Université/Université Paris Diderot and IPAG of Université Grenoble Alpes/CNRS, the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, the University of Cologne, the CENTRA (Center for Astrophysics and Gravitation of Lisbon and Porto) and the ESO. J.D. and M.R.S. were supported by a Sofja Kovalevskaja award from the Alexander von Humboldt foundation. S.F.H. acknowledges support from the EU Horizon 2020 ERC Starting Grant DUST-IN-THE-WIND (ERC-2015-StG-677117). M.K. acknowledges support from JSPS (16H05731). P.O.P. acknowledges financial support from the French PNHE. A.A. and P.J.V.G. acknowledge support from FCT-Portugal, reference UID/FIS/00099/2013. J.D. thanks A. Pancoast for discussions related to velocity-resolved reverberation mapping models and observations. E.S. thanks L. Burtscher for discussions in the preparatory phase of the project.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks E. Kara and Y. Shen for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Author notes

  1. A list of participants and their affiliations appears at the end of the paper.

  2. These authors contributed equally: E. Sturm, J. Dexter.


  1. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, Germany

    • E. Sturm
    • , J. Dexter
    • , O. Pfuhl
    • , M. R. Stock
    • , R. I. Davies
    • , D. Lutz
    • , F. Eisenhauer
    • , R. Genzel
    • , I. Waisberg
    • , N. M. Förster Schreiber
    • , S. Gillessen
    • , T. Ott
    • , L. J. Tacconi
    •  & F. Widmann
  2. LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Meudon, France

    • Y. Clénet
    • , D. Gratadour
    • , S. Lacour
    • , G. Perrin
    • , D. Rouan
    •  & T. Paumard
  3. I. Physikalisches Institut, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Germany

    • A. Eckart
    •  & C. Straubmeier
  4. Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy, Bonn, Germany

    • A. Eckart
  5. Departments of Physics and Astronomy, Le Conte Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    • R. Genzel
  6. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

    • S. F. Hönig
  7. Department of Physics, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kita-ku, Japan

    • M. Kishimoto
  8. Université Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, Nice, France

    • F. Millour
  9. School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    • H. Netzer
  10. Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    • B. M. Peterson
  11. Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    • B. M. Peterson
  12. Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA

    • B. M. Peterson
  13. Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG, Grenoble, France

    • P. O. Petrucci
    •  & K. Perraut
  14. European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany

    • J. Woillez
  15. CENTRA, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

    • A. Amorim
  16. Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg, Germany

    • W. Brandner
    •  & S. Scheithauer
  17. CENTRA, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

    • P. J. V. Garcia
  18. European Southern Observatory, Vitacura, Chile

    • P. J. V. Garcia


  1. GRAVITY Collaboration


E.S., J.D., O.P., R.I.D., D.L., Y.C., F.E., R.G., D.G., S.F.H., M.K., F.M., H.N., G.P., B.M.P., P.O.P., D.R. and I.W. designed the GRAVITY AGN open time programme; E.S., J.D., O.P., R.I.D., F.E., G.P. and I.W. planned and performed the observations; J.D., M.R.S. and O.P. processed, analysed and modelled the data; J.D., E.S., M.R.S., O.P. and H.N. drafted the text, figures and methods. All authors helped with the interpretation of the data and the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to E. Sturm or J. Dexter.

Extended data figures and tables

  1. Extended Data Fig. 1 Differential phases and uv coverage.

    a, Differential phase curves (coloured points with 1σ error bars) on the six VLTI baselines (rows) at four epochs (columns) and time-averaged 3C 273 Paα line profile (black points, identical in each panel). The best-fitting BLR model to all data are shown as solid lines. b, uv coverage for all of our data (in units of millions of λ, Mλ), with observed points (in colour) mirrored in grey. Note the close alignment between all baselines, particularly those without UT4, with the position angle of the large-scale radio jet of 3C 273.

  2. Extended Data Fig. 2 Observed centroid positions in several wavelength channels.

    Best-fitting centroids to the differential phase data in each wavelength channel are shown as in Fig. 1, but with contour ellipses containing 68% of the probability density. In addition, the extremal points to the blue (on the jet axis) and red are not shown in Fig. 1, because of their larger errors. Given the relatively low signal-to-noise ratio in each channel, we cannot measure the radial velocity as a function of position (for example, the rotation curve). ΔDec, declination offset; ΔRA, right ascension offset.

  3. Extended Data Fig. 3 Corner plot of the BLR model parameters.

    One- and two-dimensional probability density distributions from fitting the seven-parameter BLR model to the spectral line profile and differential phase data for 3C 273 obtained from GRAVITY. The blue points show the parameter values at which the highest likelihood was obtained, the dashed lines in the one-dimensional distributions are the 5% and 95% quantiles, and contours are at 1σ, 2σ and 3σ.

  4. Extended Data Fig. 4 Additional BLR size constraints.

    We averaged the differential visibility amplitude (blue, ‘visamp’) for 3C 273 over all epochs and between the two longest baselines (UT4-1 and UT3-1). Error bars are 1σ. The amplitude increases at the spectral line (black), demonstrating that the hot dust continuum (which has a radius of about 150 μas) is much larger in size than the BLR. This result rules out a previous claim of a large region size in 3C 27312, and is consistent with the compact size (RBLR ≈ 50 μas) that we find independently from modelling interferometric phase and spectral-line data.

  5. Extended Data Table 1 GRAVITY data used for this work

Source data

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.