Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A structural transition in physical networks


In many physical networks, including neurons in the brain1,2, three-dimensional integrated circuits3 and underground hyphal networks4, the nodes and links are physical objects that cannot intersect or overlap with each other. To take this into account, non-crossing conditions can be imposed to constrain the geometry of networks, which consequently affects how they form, evolve and function. However, these constraints are not included in the theoretical frameworks that are currently used to characterize real networks5,6,7. Most tools for laying out networks are variants of the force-directed layout algorithm8,9—which assumes dimensionless nodes and links—and are therefore unable to reveal the geometry of densely packed physical networks. Here we develop a modelling framework that accounts for the physical sizes of nodes and links, allowing us to explore how non-crossing conditions affect the geometry of a network. For small link thicknesses, we observe a weakly interacting regime in which link crossings are avoided via local link rearrangements, without altering the overall geometry of the layout compared to the force-directed layout. Once the link thickness exceeds a threshold, a strongly interacting regime emerges in which multiple geometric quantities, such as the total link length and the link curvature, scale with the link thickness. We show that the crossover between the two regimes is driven by the non-crossing condition, which allows us to derive the transition point analytically and show that networks with large numbers of nodes will ultimately exist in the strongly interacting regime. We also find that networks in the weakly interacting regime display a solid-like response to stress, whereas in the strongly interacting regime they behave in a gel-like fashion. Networks in the weakly interacting regime are amenable to 3D printing and so can be used to visualize network geometry, and the strongly interacting regime provides insights into the scaling of the sizes of densely packed mammalian brains.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Modelling framework to avoid link and node crossings.
Fig. 2: Crossover in network layouts.
Fig. 3: Stressed networks and 3D printing.

Data availability

All data used in the figures were generated using the simulation code available at The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Kasthuri, N. et al. Saturated reconstruction of a volume of neocortex. Cell 162, 648–661 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oh, S. W. et al. A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain. Nature 508, 207–214 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong, S. et al. Monolithic 3D integrated circuits. In 2007 International Symposium onVLSI Technology, Systems and Applications 1–4 (IEEE, 2007).

  4. Friese, C. F. & Allen, M. F. The spread of Va mycorrhizal fungal hyphae in the soil: inoculum types and external hyphal architecture. Mycologia 83, 409–418 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M. & Vespignani, A. Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Barabási, A.-L. Network Science (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2016).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Albert, R. & Barabási, A.-L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47–97 (2002).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamada, T. & Kawai, S. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Inf. Process. Lett. 31, 7–15 (1989).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Fruchterman, T. M. & Reingold, E. M. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw. Pract. Exper. 21, 1129–1164 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubrovin, B., Fomenko, A. & Novikov, S. Modern Geometry—Methods and Applications. Part II: The Geometry and Topology of Manifolds [transl. by R. G. Burns] 371–379 (Springer, New York, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. des Cloizeaux, J. Lagrangian theory for a self-avoiding random chain. Phys. Rev. A 10, 1665–1669 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mézard, M. & Parisi, G. Replica field theory for random manifolds. J. Phys. I 1, 809–836 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gay, J. & Berne, B. Modification of the overlap potential to mimic a linear site–site potential. J. Chem. Phys. 74, 3316–3319 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bouchaud, J.-P., Cugliandolo, L. F., Kurchan, J. & Mezard, M. in Spin Glasses and Random Fields (ed. Young, A. P.) 161–223 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).

  15. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., Jr & Vecchi, M. P. in Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (eds Mézard, M., Parisi, G. & Virasoro, M. A.) 339–348 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).

  16. Barabási, A.-L. & Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaikin, P. M. & Lubensky, T. C. Principles of Condensed Matter Physics Ch. 5.8 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cardy, J. Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics Vol. 5, 67–71 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Irgens, F. Continuum Mechanics 60–73 (Springer, Berlin, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zeeman, E. C. Unknotting combinatorial balls. Ann. Math. 78, 501–526 (1963).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahn, Y.-Y., Ahnert, S. E., Bagrow, J. P. & Barabási, A.-L. Flavor network and the principles of food pairing. Sci. Rep. 1, 196 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stepanyants, A., Hof, P. R. & Chklovskii, D. B. Geometry and structural plasticity of synaptic connectivity. Neuron 34, 275–288 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rivera-Alba, M. et al. Wiring economy and volume exclusion determine neuronal placement in the Drosophila brain. Curr. Biol. 21, 2000–2005 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ventura-Antunes, L., Mota, B. & Herculano-Houzel, S. Different scaling of white matter volume, cortical connectivity, and gyrification across rodent and primate brains. Front. Neuroanat. 7, 3 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bullmore, E. & Sporns, O. The economy of brain network organization. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 336–349 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sporns, O., Chialvo, D. R., Kaiser, M. & Hilgetag, C. C. Organization, development and function of complex brain networks. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 418–425 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank A. Grishchenko for 3D visualizations and photography, K. Albrecht, M. Martino and H. Sayama for discussions, and Formlabs and Shapeways for 3D printing. We were supported by grants from Templeton (award number 61066), NSF (award number 1735505), NIH (award number P01HL132825) and AHA (award number 151708).

Reviewer information

Nature thanks G. Bianconi and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



N.D. developed, ran and analysed the simulations, performed the mathematical modelling and derivations, and contributed to writing the manuscript. S.M. contributed to programming and running the simulations, generating figures, editing and 3D printing. A.-L.B. contributed to the conceptual design of the study and was the lead writer of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert-László Barabási.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains the extended mathematical derivations and supplementary figures. It contains 26 figures, displaying the link crossing problem and our solution to it, followed by description of the phase space, order parameters and finite-size analysis to describe the nature of the transition.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dehmamy, N., Milanlouei, S. & Barabási, AL. A structural transition in physical networks. Nature 563, 676–680 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Physical Network
  • Link Thickness
  • Total Link Length
  • Force-directed Layout (FDL)
  • Linkage Curve

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing