Abstract

One of the hallmarks of quantum physics is the generation of non-classical quantum states and superpositions, which has been demonstrated in several quantum systems, including ions, solid-state qubits and photons. However, only indirect demonstrations of non-classical states have been achieved in mechanical systems, despite the scientific appeal and technical utility of such a capability1,2, including in quantum sensing, computation and communication applications. This is due in part to the highly linear response of most mechanical systems, which makes quantum operations difficult, as well as their characteristically low frequencies, which hinder access to the quantum ground state3,4,5,6,7. Here we demonstrate full quantum control of the mechanical state of a macroscale mechanical resonator. We strongly couple a surface acoustic-wave8 resonator to a superconducting qubit, using the qubit to control and measure quantum states in the mechanical resonator. We generate a non-classical superposition of the zero- and one-phonon Fock states and map this and other states using Wigner tomography9,10,11,12,13,14. Such precise, programmable quantum control is essential to a range of applications of surface acoustic waves in the quantum limit, including the coupling of disparate quantum systems15,16.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The datasets supporting this work are available from the corresponding author on request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Stannigel, K., Rabl, P., Sørensen, A. S., Zoller, P. & Lukin, M. D. Optomechanical transducers for long-distance quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 220501 (2010).

  2. 2.

    Kurizki, G. et al. Quantum technologies with hybrid systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3866–3873 (2015).

  3. 3.

    O’Connell, A. D. et al. Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator. Nature 464, 697–703 (2010).

  4. 4.

    Teufel, J. D. et al. Sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state. Nature 475, 359–363 (2011).

  5. 5.

    Chan, J. et al. Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state. Nature 478, 89–92 (2011).

  6. 6.

    Wollman, E. E. et al. Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator. Science 349, 952–955 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Chu, Y. et al. Quantum acoustics with superconducting qubits. Science 358, 199–202 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Morgan, D. Surface Acoustic Wave Filters: With Applications to Electronic Communications and Signal Processing 2nd edn (Academic Press, Oxford, 2007).

  9. 9.

    Law, C. K. & Eberly, J. H. Arbitrary control of a quantum electromagnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1055–1058 (1996).

  10. 10.

    Banaszek, K., Radzewicz, C., Wódkiewicz, K. & Krasiński, J. S. Direct measurement of the Wigner function by photon counting. Phys. Rev. A 60, 674–677 (1999).

  11. 11.

    Bertet, P. et al. Direct measurement of the Wigner function of a one-photon Fock state in a cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 200402 (2002).

  12. 12.

    Haroche, S. & Raimond, J.-M. Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities and Photons (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2006).

  13. 13.

    Hofheinz, M. et al. Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator. Nature 459, 546–549 (2009).

  14. 14.

    Vlastakis, B. et al. Deterministically encoding quantum information using 100-photon Schrödinger cat states. Science 342, 607–610 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Schuetz, M. et al. Universal quantum transducers based on surface acoustic waves. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031031 (2015).

  16. 16.

    Whiteley, S. J. et al. Probing spin–phonon interactions in silicon carbide with Gaussian acoustics. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.10996 (2018).

  17. 17.

    Bohr, N. Über die Serienspektra der Elemente. Z. Phys. 2, 423–469 (1920).

  18. 18.

    Lee, K. C. et al. Entangling macroscopic diamonds at room temperature. Science 334, 1253–1256 (2011).

  19. 19.

    Gustafsson, M. V. et al. Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom. Science 346, 207–211 (2014).

  20. 20.

    Manenti, R. et al. Circuit quantum acoustodynamics with surface acoustic waves. Nat. Commun. 8, 975 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Moores, B. A., Sletton, L. R., Viennot, J. J. & Lehnert, K. W. Cavity quantum acoustic device in the multimode strong coupling regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 227701 (2018).

  22. 22.

    Arcizet, O. et al. A single nitrogen-vacancy defect coupled to a nanomechanical oscillator. Nat. Phys. 7, 879–883 (2011).

  23. 23.

    Kolkowitz, S. et al. Coherent sensing of a mechanical resonator with a single-spin qubit. Science 335, 1603–1606 (2012).

  24. 24.

    Yeo, I. et al. Strain-mediated coupling in a quantum dot–mechanical oscillator hybrid system. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 106–110 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Lee, K. W. et al. Strain coupling of a mechanical resonator to a single quantum emitter in diamond. Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 034005 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Riedinger, R. et al. Remote quantum entanglement between two micromechanical oscillators. Nature 556, 473–477 (2018).

  27. 27.

    Ockeloen-Korppi, C. F. et al. Stabilized entanglement of massive mechanical oscillators. Nature 556, 478–482 (2018).

  28. 28.

    Cleland, A. N. & Geller, M. R. Superconducting qubit storage and entanglement with nanomechanical resonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 070501 (2004).

  29. 29.

    Chu, Y. et al. Creation and control of multi-phonon Fock states in a bulk acoustic-wave resonator. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0717-7 (2018).

  30. 30.

    Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).

  31. 31.

    Barends, R. et al. Coherent Josephson qubit suitable for scalable quantum integrated circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 080502 (2013).

  32. 32.

    Chen, Y. et al. Qubit architecture with high coherence and fast tunable coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 220502 (2014).

  33. 33.

    Geerlings, K. et al. Demonstrating a driven reset protocol for a superconducting qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 120501 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. J. Duda, A. Dunsworth and D. Sank for discussions. Devices and experiments were supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Army Research Laboratory and the Department of Energy (DOE). K.J.S. and S.J.W. were supported by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) GRFP (NSF DGE-1144085); É.D. was supported by LDRD funds from Argonne National Laboratory; A.N.C. and D.D.A. were supported by the DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences; and D.I.S. acknowledges support from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. This work was partially supported by the UChicago MRSEC (NSF DMR-1420709) and made use of the Pritzker Nanofabrication Facility, which receives support from SHyNE, a node of the NSF’s National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure (NSF NNCI-1542205).

Reviewer information

Nature thanks S. Deleglise and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

    • K. J. Satzinger
    •  & G. A. Peairs
  2. Institute for Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    • K. J. Satzinger
    • , Y. P. Zhong
    • , H.-S. Chang
    • , G. A. Peairs
    • , A. Bienfait
    • , Ming-Han Chou
    • , A. Y. Cleland
    • , C. R. Conner
    • , É. Dumur
    • , J. Grebel
    • , I. Gutierrez
    • , B. H. November
    • , R. G. Povey
    • , S. J. Whiteley
    • , D. D. Awschalom
    •  & A. N. Cleland
  3. Department of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    • Ming-Han Chou
    • , R. G. Povey
    • , S. J. Whiteley
    •  & D. I. Schuster
  4. Institute for Molecular Engineering and Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Lemont, IL, USA

    • É. Dumur
    • , D. D. Awschalom
    •  & A. N. Cleland

Authors

  1. Search for K. J. Satzinger in:

  2. Search for Y. P. Zhong in:

  3. Search for H.-S. Chang in:

  4. Search for G. A. Peairs in:

  5. Search for A. Bienfait in:

  6. Search for Ming-Han Chou in:

  7. Search for A. Y. Cleland in:

  8. Search for C. R. Conner in:

  9. Search for É. Dumur in:

  10. Search for J. Grebel in:

  11. Search for I. Gutierrez in:

  12. Search for B. H. November in:

  13. Search for R. G. Povey in:

  14. Search for S. J. Whiteley in:

  15. Search for D. D. Awschalom in:

  16. Search for D. I. Schuster in:

  17. Search for A. N. Cleland in:

Contributions

K.J.S. designed and fabricated the devices. K.J.S., H.-S.C., J.G., A.Y.C. and S.J.W. developed the fabrication processes. G.A.P., É.D. and A.N.C. contributed to device design. K.J.S. performed the experiments and analysed the data with assistance from Y.P.Z., A.B. and É.D. Assistance was provided by I.G. and B.H.N. A.N.C., D.I.S. and D.D.A. advised on all efforts. All authors contributed to discussions and the production of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Cleland.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    This merged file includes all supplementary information, including text, five figures and additional references. It comprises three sections describing: Device details; models used to predict and understand the results; and more details on the experimental results as well as additional experiments performed and not reported in the main text.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0719-5

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.