U–Pb-dated flowstones restrict South African early hominin record to dry climate phases

Abstract

The Cradle of Humankind (Cradle) in South Africa preserves a rich collection of fossil hominins representing Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo1. The ages of these fossils are contentious2,3,4 and have compromised the degree to which the South African hominin record can be used to test hypotheses of human evolution. However, uranium–lead (U–Pb) analyses of horizontally bedded layers of calcium carbonate (flowstone) provide a potential opportunity to obtain a robust chronology5. Flowstones are ubiquitous cave features and provide a palaeoclimatic context, because they grow only during phases of increased effective precipitation6,7, ideally in closed caves. Here we show that flowstones from eight Cradle caves date to six narrow time intervals between 3.2 and 1.3 million years ago. We use a kernel density estimate to combine 29 U–Pb ages into a single record of flowstone growth intervals. We interpret these as major wet phases, when an increased water supply, more extensive vegetation cover and at least partially closed caves allowed for undisturbed, semi-continuous growth of the flowstones. The intervening times represent substantially drier phases, during which fossils of hominins and other fossils accumulated in open caves. Fossil preservation, restricted to drier intervals, thus biases the view of hominin evolutionary history and behaviour, and places the hominins in a community of comparatively dry-adapted fauna. Although the periods of cave closure leave temporal gaps in the South African fossil record, the flowstones themselves provide valuable insights into both local and pan-African climate variability.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Map of the localities and analyses of the flowstone ages  versus geographic variables.
Fig. 2: U–Pb chronology of the Cradle.

Data availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and the Supplementary Information (see Supplementary Information and Supplementary Table 1).

References

  1. 1.

    Wood, B. & Boyle, E. K. Hominin taxic diversity: fact or fantasy? Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 159, 37–78 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Herries, A. I. R. & Shaw, J. Palaeomagnetic analysis of the Sterkfontein palaeocave deposits: implications for the age of the hominin fossils and stone tool industries. J. Hum. Evol. 60, 523–539 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Granger, D. E. et al. New cosmogenic burial ages for Sterkfontein Member 2 Australopithecus and Member 5 Oldowan. Nature 522, 85–88 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kramers, J. D. & Dirks, P. H. G. M. The age of fossil StW573 (‘Little Foot’): an alternative interpretation of 26Al/10Be burial data. S. Afr. J. Sci. 113, 2016-0085 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pickering, R., Kramers, J. D., Partridge, T., Kodolanyi, J. & Pettke, T. U–Pb dating of calcite–aragonite layers in speleothems from hominin sites in South Africa by MC-ICP-MS. Quat. Geochronol. 5, 544–558 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ayliffe, L. K. et al. 500 ka precipitation record from southeastern Australia: evidence for interglacial relative aridity. Geology 26, 147–150 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Pickering, R. et al. Stratigraphy, U–Th chronology, and paleoenvironments at Gladysvale Cave: insights into the climatic control of South African hominin-bearing cave deposits. J. Hum. Evol. 53, 602–619 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dart, R. Australopithecus africanus: the man-ape of South Africa. Nature 115, 195–199 (1925).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Vrba, E. S. in Hominid Evolution. Past, Present and Future (ed. Tobias, P. V.) 195–200 (Alan R. Liss, New York, 1985).

  10. 10.

    Potts, R. Variability selection in hominid evolution. Evol. Anthropol. 7, 81–96 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Behrensmeyer, A. K., Todd, N. E., Potts, R. & McBrinn, G. E. Late Pliocene faunal turnover in the Turkana basin, Kenya and Ethiopia. Science 278, 1589–1594 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Trauth, M. H., Larrasoaña, J. C. & Mudelsee, M. Trends, rhythms and events in Plio-Pleistocene African climate. Quat. Sci. Rev. 28, 399–411 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    deMenocal, P. B. Climate and human evolution. Science 331, 540–542 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Walker, J., Cliff, R. A. & Latham, A. G. U–Pb isotopic age of the StW 573 hominid from Sterkfontein, South Africa. Science 314, 1592–1594 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Pickering, R., Kramers, J. D., Hancox, P. J., de Ruiter, D. J. & Woodhead, J. D. Contemporary flowstone development links early hominin bearing cave deposits in South Africa. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 306, 23–32 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Brain, C. K. in Paleoclimate and Evolution, with Emphasis on Human Origins (eds Vrba, E. S. G. et al.) 451–458 (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 1995).

  17. 17.

    Woodhead, J. et al. U–Pb geochronology of speleothems by MC-ICPMS. Quat. Geochronol. 1, 208–221 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    McDougall, I. et al. New single crystal 40Ar/39Ar ages improve time scale for deposition of the Omo Group, Omo–Turkana Basin, East Africa. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 169, 213–226 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Vermeesch, P. On the visualisation of detrital age distributions. Chem. Geol. 312–313, 190–194 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dirks, P. H. G. M. et al. The age of Homo naledi and associated sediments in the Rising Star Cave, South Africa. eLife 6, e24231 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    de Ruiter, D. J., Brophy, J. K., Lewis, P. J., Churchill, S. E. & Berger, L. R. Faunal assemblage composition and paleoenvironment of Plovers Lake, a Middle Stone Age locality in Gauteng Province, South Africa. J. Hum. Evol. 55, 1102–1117 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gibbon, R. J. et al. Cosmogenic nuclide burial dating of hominin-bearing Pleistocene cave deposits at Swartkrans, South Africa. Quat. Geochronol. 24, 10–15 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Herries, A. I. R. et al. in Paleobiology of Australopithecus (Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series) (eds Reed, K. E. et al.) 21–40 (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2013).

  24. 24.

    Eldredge, N. & Gould, S. J. in Models in Paleobiology (ed. Schopf, T. J. M.) 82–115 (Freeman, Cooper & Co, San Francisco, 1972).

  25. 25.

    Vrba, E. S. in Ancestors: The Hard Evidence (ed. Delson, E.) 63–71 (Alan R. Liss, New York, 1985).

  26. 26.

    Vrba, E. S. Mammals as a key to evolutionary theory. J. Mamm. 73, 1–28 (1992).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Herries, A. I. R. et al. Geoarchaeological and 3D visualisation approaches for contextualising in-situ fossil bearing palaeokarst in South Africa: a case study from the ~2.61 Ma Drimolen Makondo. Quat. Int. 483, 90–110 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lisiecki, L. E. & Raymo, M. E. A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography 20, PA1003 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pickering, R. et al. Australopithecus sediba at 1.977 Ma and implications for the origins of the genus Homo. Science 333, 1421–1423 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Paton, C., Hellstrom, J., Paul, B., Woodhead, J. & Hergt, J. Iolite: freeware for the visualisation and processing of mass spectrometric data. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 26, 2508–2518 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Schmitz, M. D. & Schoene, B. Derivation of isotope ratios, errors, and error correlations for U–Pb geochronology using 205Pb–235U–(233U)-spiked isotope dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometric data. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 8, Q08006 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Dirks, P. et al. Geological setting and age of Australopithecus sediba from Southern Africa. Science 328, 205–208 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    de Ruiter, D. J. et al. New Australopithecus robustus fossils and associated U–Pb dates from Cooper’s Cave (Gauteng, South Africa). J. Hum. Evol. 56, 497–513 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wynn, J. G. Influence of Plio-Pleistocene aridification on human evolution: evidence from paleosols of the Turkana Basin, Kenya. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 123, 106–118 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Trauth, M. H., Maslin, M. A., Deino, A. & Strecker, M. R. Late Cenozoic moisture history of east Africa. Science 309, 2051–2053 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Maslin, M. A. & Trauth, M. H. in The First Humans: Origins of the Genus Homo (eds Grine, F. E. et al.) 151–158 (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2009).

  37. 37.

    Potts, R. & Faith, J. T. Alternating high and low climate variability: the context of natural selection and speciation in Plio-Pleistocene hominin evolution. J. Hum. Evol. 87, 5–20 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Braun, R. Potts, B. Wood and W. L. S. Joe for their insightful discussion. Site access granted by C. Steininger, R. Clarke, T. Pickering, C. Menter, S. Potze, J. Adams  and L. Berger; permits provided by South African Heritage Resource Agency. This work was supported by Australian Research Council DECRA DE120102504 (to R.P.), University of Melbourne McKenzie Post-Doctoral Fellowship 0023249 (to R.P.), Australian Research Council Future Fellowship FT120100399 (to A.I.R.H.) and Discovery Project DP170100056 (to A.I.R.H. and D.S.S.) and National Science Foundation Grant BCS 0962564 (to A.I.R.H.) .

Reviewer information

Nature thanks C. Feibel, T. Rasbury and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.P. devised the project, conducted the U–Pb dating, drafted and revised the manuscript; A.I.R.H. assisted in the project design, fieldwork and site access; J.D.W., J.C.H., H.E.G. and B.P. assisted with U–Pb and 234U/238U analysis, data processing and discussion; T.R. and D.S.S. contributed to the hominin discussion; B.J.S. assisted with data visualization, including Supplementary Video 1 and discussion; P.J.H. contributed to the conceptual design of the project and provided field support. All authors contributed equally to the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robyn Pickering.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Field photographs showing U–Pb-dated flowstone from the indicated sites, all of which record some variation of an alternating stack of flowstones and fossil-bearing sediments.

a, The basal flowstone from Cooper’s Cave. b, c, Flowstones at Haasgat are preserved in the now-deroofed section of the deposits (b) and inside the cave (c). d, The flowstone capping the MB1 Lower Bank at Swartkrans. e, f, Flowstone from Bolt’s Farm Pit 7 at the base (e) and top (f) of the sequence. g, Flowstone capping Member 4 at Sterkfontein. h, Flowstone underlying fossil bearing sediments at Malapa. i, Flowstone sandwiched between fossil-bearing sediments at Drimolen. j, Massive flowstone at the base of Member 4 at Sterkfontein is exposed in a borehole. k, Flowstone underlying fossil-bearing sediments at Hoogland.

Extended Data Fig. 2 U–Pb ages plotted against time and by site, additional un-U–Pb dated Cradle sites and non-Cradle hominin cave sites included.

ae, A variation of Fig. 2. U–Pb ages of Cradle sites are shown, with Cradle sites not dated with U–Pb (Gondolin and Kromdraai) included, as well as the non-Cradle hominin cave sites (Makapansgat and Taung) shown for comparison. All U–Pb ages are plotted against time and by site, n = 29, diamonds represent individual ages and 2σ errors are shown as whiskers. Also included here are four records of climate and variability derived from orbital parameters for East African sites (d), specifically arid phases from soil carbonates34, periods of deep rift valley lakes35, phases of extreme climate variability36 and key phases of variability as described previously37. Again, there is no clear relationship between these records and the new South African flowstone record. Indicated data were obtained from previous studies28,34,35,36,37.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Discussion

Detailed discussion about the ages of the sedimentary fossil bearing units preserved in the Cradle caves.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

All uranium and lead isotope concentration and ratio data needed for age calculations.

Supplementary Video 1

Animation showing the location and age distribution of speleothem samples at hominin bearing cave sites in the Cradle of Humankind between 3.200 and 1.332 million years ago.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pickering, R., Herries, A.I.R., Woodhead, J.D. et al. U–Pb-dated flowstones restrict South African early hominin record to dry climate phases. Nature 565, 226–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0711-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Flowstone
  • Hominin Fossil Record
  • Open Caves
  • Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Dataset
  • Malapa

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing