Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The entropic force generated by intrinsically disordered segments tunes protein function


Protein structures are dynamic and can explore a large conformational landscape1,2. Only some of these structural substates are important for protein function (such as ligand binding, catalysis and regulation)3,4,5. How evolution shapes the structural ensemble to optimize a specific function is poorly understood3,4. One of the constraints on the evolution of proteins is the stability of the folded ‘native’ state. Despite this, 44% of the human proteome contains intrinsically disordered peptide segments greater than 30 residues in length6, the majority of which have no known function7,8,9. Here we show that the entropic force produced by an intrinsically disordered carboxy terminus (ID-tail) shifts the conformational ensemble of human UDP-α-d-glucose-6-dehydrogenase (UGDH) towards a substate with a high affinity for an allosteric inhibitor. The function of the ID-tail does not depend on its sequence or chemical composition. Instead, the affinity enhancement can be accurately predicted based on the length of the intrinsically disordered segment, and is consistent with the entropic force generated by an unstructured peptide attached to the protein surface10,11,12,13. Our data show that the unfolded state of the ID-tail rectifies the dynamics and structure of UGDH to favour inhibitor binding. Because this entropic rectifier does not have any sequence or structural constraints, it is an easily acquired adaptation. This model implies that evolution selects for disordered segments to tune the energy landscape of proteins, which may explain the persistence of intrinsic disorder in the proteome.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: The role of the ID-tail in allosteric inhibition of UGDH.
Fig. 2: Structural constraints of the ID-tail.
Fig. 3: The entropic force of the ID-tail alters the structure of UGDH.
Fig. 4: The ID-tail shapes the conformational landscape of UGDH.

Data availability

The structure factors and coordinates described in this manuscript have been deposited at the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 5W4X and 5VR8. All data generated or analysed in this study can be found in the Extended Data and the provided Source Data files.


  1. 1.

    Frauenfelder, H., Sligar, S. G. & Wolynes, P. G. The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 254, 1598–1603 (1991).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Henzler-Wildman, K. & Kern, D. Dynamic personalities of proteins. Nature 450, 964–972 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Campbell, E. et al. The role of protein dynamics in the evolution of new enzyme function. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 944–950 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Boehr, D. D., Nussinov, R. & Wright, P. E. The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 789–796 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kumar, S., Ma, B., Tsai, C. J., Sinha, N. & Nussinov, R. Folding and binding cascades: dynamic landscapes and population shifts. Protein Sci. 9, 10–19 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Oates, M. E. et al. D2P2: database of disordered protein predictions. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D508–D516 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    van der Lee, R. et al. Classification of intrinsically disordered regions and proteins. Chem. Rev. 114, 6589–6631 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Papaleo, E. et al. The role of protein loops and linkers in conformational dynamics and allostery. Chem. Rev. 116, 6391–6423 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    He, B. et al. Predicting intrinsic disorder in proteins: an overview. Cell Res. 19, 929–949 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bickel, T., Jeppesen, C. & Marques, C. M. Local entropic effects of polymers grafted to soft interfaces. Eur. Phys. J. E 4, 33–43 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bickel, T., Marques, C. & Jeppesen, C. Pressure patches for membranes: the induced pinch of a grafted polymer. Phys. Rev. E 62, 1124–1127 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Waters, J. T. & Kim, H. D. Calculation of a fluctuating entropic force by phase space sampling. Phys. Rev. E 92, 013308 (2015).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Carmichael, S. P. & Shell, M. S. Entropic (de)stabilization of surface-bound peptides conjugated with polymers. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 243103 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ferreon, A. C., Ferreon, J. C., Wright, P. E. & Deniz, A. A. Modulation of allostery by protein intrinsic disorder. Nature 498, 390–394 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hilser, V. J. An ensemble view of allostery. Science 327, 653–654 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hilser, V. J. & Thompson, E. B. Intrinsic disorder as a mechanism to optimize allosteric coupling in proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8311–8315 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sugase, K., Dyson, H. J. & Wright, P. E. Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein. Nature 447, 1021–1025 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Li, J. et al. Genetically tunable frustration controls allostery in an intrinsically disordered transcription factor. eLife 6, e30688 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Egger, S., Chaikuad, A., Kavanagh, K. L., Oppermann, U. & Nidetzky, B. Structure and mechanism of human UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 23877–23887 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gainey, P. A. & Phelps, C. F. Interactions of uridine-diphosphate glucose dehydrogenase with inhibitor uridine-diphosphate xylose. Biochem. J. 145, 129–134 (1975).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Neufeld, E. F. & Hall, C. W. Inhibition of UDP-d-glucose dehydrogenase by UDP-D-xylose - a possible regulatory mechanism. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 19, 456–461 (1965).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Beattie, N. R., Keul, N. D., Sidlo, A. M. & Wood, Z. A. Allostery and hysteresis are coupled in human UDP-glucose dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 56, 202–211 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kadirvelraj, R., Sennett, N. C., Custer, G. S., Phillips, R. S. & Wood, Z. A. Hysteresis and negative cooperativity in human UDP-glucose dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 52, 1456–1465 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kadirvelraj, R., Sennett, N. C., Polizzi, S. J., Weitzel, S. & Wood, Z. A. Role of packing defects in the evolution of allostery and induced fit in human UDP-glucose dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 50, 5780–5789 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sennett, N. C., Kadirvelraj, R. & Wood, Z. A. Conformational flexibility in the allosteric regulation of human UDP-α-d-glucose 6-dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 50, 9651–9663 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sennett, N. C., Kadirvelraj, R. & Wood, Z. A. Cofactor binding triggers a molecular switch to allosterically activate human UDP-α-d-glucose 6-dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 51, 9364–9374 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kadirvelraj, R. et al. Hysteresis in human UDP-glucose dehydrogenase is due to a restrained hexameric structure that favors feedback inhibition. Biochemistry 53, 8043–8051 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Uversky, V. N. The intrinsic disorder alphabet. III. Dual personality of serine. Intrinsically Disord. Proteins 3, e1027032 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Theillet, F. X. et al. The alphabet of intrinsic disorder: I. Act like a pro: On the abundance and roles of proline residues in intrinsically disordered proteins. Intrinsically Disord. Proteins 1, e24360 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Busch, D. J. et al. Intrinsically disordered proteins drive membrane curvature. Nat. Commun. 6, 7875 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Balasubramaniam, D. & Komives, E. A. Hydrogen-exchange mass spectrometry for the study of intrinsic disorder in proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1834, 1202–1209 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chen, J. Z. Y. Theory of wormlike polymer chains in confinement. Prog. Polym. Sci. 54–55, 3–46 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Smyda, M. R. & Harvey, S. C. The entropic cost of polymer confinement. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 10928–10934 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Thielges, M. C., Chung, J. K., Axup, J. Y. & Fayer, M. D. Influence of histidine tag attachment on picosecond protein dynamics. Biochemistry 50, 5799–5805 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wilkins, M. R. et al. Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. Methods Mol. Biol. 112, 531–552 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kabsch, W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125–132 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Brunger, A. T. Free R value: cross-validation in crystallography. Methods Enzymol. 277, 366–396 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Urzhumtsev, A., Afonine, P. V. & Adams, P. D. TLS from fundamentals to practice. Crystallogr. Rev. 19, 230–270 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Karplus, P. A. & Diederichs, K. Linking crystallographic model and data quality. Science 336, 1030–1033 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Diederichs, K. & Karplus, P. A. Improved R-factors for diffraction data analysis in macromolecular crystallography. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 269–275 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Frieden, C. Kinetic aspects of regulation of metabolic processes. The hysteretic enzyme concept. J. Biol. Chem. 245, 5788–5799 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Laue, T. M., Shah, B. D., Ridgeway, T. M. & Pelletier, S. L. Analytical Ultracentrifugation. (Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Schuck, P. Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling. Biophys. J. 78, 1606–1619 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Schuck, P. On the analysis of protein self-association by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation. Anal. Biochem. 320, 104–124 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ortega, A., Amoros, D. & Garcia de la Torre, J. Prediction of hydrodynamic and other solution properties of rigid proteins from atomic- and residue-level models. Biophys. J. 101, 892–898 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R. & Thornton, J. M. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8, 275–282 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ramachandran, G. N., Ramakrishnan, C. & Sasisekharan, V. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J. Mol. Biol. 7, 95–99 (1963).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Word, J. M., Lovell, S. C., Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. Asparagine and glutamine: Using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J. Mol. Biol. 285, 1735–1747 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Huynh, K. & Partch, C. L. Analysis of protein stability and ligand interactions by thermal shift assay. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 79, 28.9.1–28.9.14 (2015).

  54. 54.

    Fang, J. et al. Conformational dynamics of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase manager proteins UmuD and UmuD′. J. Mol. Biol. 398, 40–53 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wales, T. E. & Engen, J. R. Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry for the analysis of protein dynamics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 25, 158–170 (2006).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Johnson, B. et al. Dimerization controls Marburg virus VP24-dependent modulation of host antioxidative stress responses. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 3483–3494 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Chen, E. et al. Broadly neutralizing epitopes in the Plasmodium vivax vaccine candidate Duffy Binding Protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6277–6282 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Yan, Y., Grant, G. A. & Gross, M. L. Hydrogen–deuterium exchange mass spectrometry reveals unique conformational and chemical transformations occurring upon [4Fe-4S] cluster binding in the type 2 l-serine dehydratase from Legionella pneumophila. Biochemistry 54, 5322–5328 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Palmier, M. O. & Van Doren, S. R. Rapid determination of enzyme kinetics from fluorescence: overcoming the inner filter effect. Anal. Biochem. 371, 43–51 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Johnson, K. A. Fitting enzyme kinetic data with KinTek Global Kinetic Explorer. Methods Enzymol. 467, 601–626 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Johnson, K. A., Simpson, Z. B. & Blom, T. Global Kinetic Explorer: a new computer program for dynamic simulation and fitting of kinetic data. Anal. Biochem. 387, 20–29 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Johnson, K. A., Simpson, Z. B. & Blom, T. FitSpace explorer: an algorithm to evaluate multidimensional parameter space in fitting kinetic data. Anal. Biochem. 387, 30–41 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank A. P. Karplus, B. W. Matthews, S. N. Savvides and the members of the Z.A.W. laboratory for helpful discussions. We also thank R. Wang of Norclone for producing the R1 truncation constructs. This work was supported by the NIH National Institute of General Medicine grants R01GM114298 awarded to Z.A.W. and P41GM103422 awarded to M.L.G.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks J. Gsponer and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information




N.D.K. and Z.A.W. designed the study, analysed the data and composed the manuscript. N.D.K. performed the majority of the experiments. K.O. performed all the bioinformatic analyses and conducted the simulations of the ID-tail and analysed the results with S.C.H. S.C.H. contributed to the development of the entropic force model. E.T.S.B. performed HDX mass spectrometry experiments and interpreted the results with M.L.G. Both offered direction in HDX experiment design and contributed to this portion of the manuscript. M.L.G. further contributed with edits to the larger work. N.R.B. performed analysis and refinement of crystal structures. W.E.M. conducted several AUC experiments and performed thermal denaturation assays. R.K. solved Protein Data Bank entry 5VR8. R.S.P. contributed to the development of our kinetic model.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachary A. Wood.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 The crystal structures of UGDH(FL) and UGDH(ΔID) show no significant structural deviations, and structural evidence for UDP-Xyl binding in the NAD+ site.

ac, Structural overlay (root mean square deviation (r.m.s.d) = 0.385 Å), comparing the UGDH(FL) (cyan) and UGDH(ΔID) (grey) E* hexamers (a, b) and monomers (c). PDB entries for UGDH(FL) and UGDH(ΔID) are 4RJT and 5W4X, respectively (Extended Data Table 1). d, Crystal structure of native UGDH with UDP-Xyl bound in the active site. Difference density map (F0 – Fc) of UDP-Xyl (chain B) calculated at 2.0 Å resolution and contoured at 3.5σ. The map was calculated after omitting the UDP-Xyl and subjecting the model to simulated annealing. el, UDP-Xyl can also bind weakly to the NAD+-binding site of native UGDH. Difference electron density maps (F0 – Fc) were calculated as in d. The uracil and xylose in the NAD+-binding sites were contoured at 3.5 and 3σ for chain A (e and f, respectively), chain B (g and h, respectively), chain D (i and j, respectively) and chain E (k and l, respectively). Chains C and F do not contain UDP-Xyl in the NAD+-binding site. UDP-Xyl binding in the NAD+ site is the source of mixed inhibition observed in the UGDH(FL-dimer) and UGDH(ΔID-dimer) constructs. (see Supplementary Information, Section 1). PDB entry: 5VR8 (this work, Extended Data Table 1).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Steady-state kinetic analysis of all UGDH constructs.

aw, Inhibition studies with the allosteric inhibitor UDP-Xyl. Data from two or three independent rate curves were globally fit to equation (7) (or equation (8) for dimers cf) using nonlinear regression (n ≥ 26 data points). See Extended Data Table 2 for the specific number of data points and fit parameters. Dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. xkk, NAD+ substrate-saturation curves fit to equation (6) using nonlinear regression (n ≥ 10 independent data points). See Extended Data Table 3 for the specific number of data points used in global fitting. Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Sedimentation velocity studies of the UGDH constructs.

as, Plots of the c(s) distributions with oligomeric species labelled as H (hexamer), T (tetramer), D (dimer) or M (monomer). The R2 mutant (h) shows no change in UDP-Xyl affinity (Fig. 2c and Extended Data Table 2), yet shows evidence of a less stable hexamer. Panel s was included to show that the hexamer in h is less stable partly owing to the K465D substitution in the UGDH(R2) construct. The K465D substitution introduces an unfavourable negative charge near E460 in the hexamer interface, which may reduce the stability. t, Relative distributions, s values (S) and r.m.s.d. values for all sedimentation velocity experiments. Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 The ID-tail is conserved in vertebrates.

a, ClustalO sequence alignment of all vertebrate UGDH ID-tail regions (79 total). Residues are coloured by type, where blue is positive charge (K, R, H), red is negative charge (D, E), peach is hydrophobic (A, V, L, I, M), orange is aromatic (F, W, Y), green is hydrophilic (S, T, N, Q), yellow is cysteine (C), and magenta is special (P, G). b, The ID-tail was extensively randomized and modified. Sequences of UGDH (FL, R1, R2, −Lys, −Pro, and Ser), aligned by position and coloured by residue type. c, Relative evolutionary rate of UGDH residues from the alignment of 79 vertebrate sequences. The ID-tail (red dots) begins at residue 465 and displays an approximately threefold higher rate of divergence than the folded portion of the protein (black dots). For clarity, only a small, representative segment of the folded protein is shown (residues 460–464). All rates were scaled such that the average rate is 1.0 across the entire dataset.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Exhaustive Monte Carlo simulations constraining the ID-tail.

a, Dashed lines outline the traditional, generously allowed regions of the Ramachandran plot, whereas the red circles identify the conformations used in the Monte Carlo simulations. b, The ranges of ϕ and ψ angles depicted in a. The 10 × 10° bins are centred on the first and last numbers in the range. For example, in region 1, the first ϕ, ψ bin (−155°, 90°) represents the ϕ range −155° to −145° and the ψ range 85° to 95°. c, Ratio of ID-tail conformations constrained (Ω2) to the number of conformations when the ID-tail is unconstrained (Ω1). The entropic costs of confining tails of each length were calculated using equation (1). d, e, The results of the 10-residue ID-tail simulations, shown in a surface representing the hexamer-building interface (orange and grey dimers) with the adjacent ID-tail (cyan) that was fixed during simulations. Also depicted is a representative sampling of 20 allowed Ω2 conformations (blue sticks) from the 4,503 identified in the Monte Carlo simulation. f, The same view as in e, but without the protein surface. gi, Same as in df, but now including a sampling of 20 of the 3,002 Ω1 conformations (red sticks) that clash with the fixed adjacent ID-tail (not depicted for clarity). jl, Same as gi, but including 750 of the 142,607 Ω1 conformations (tan sticks) that clash with the protein surface.

Extended Data Fig. 6 The ID-tail induces global changes in the structure and dynamics of UGDH.

a, The per cent deuterium uptake of the ID-tail peptide region (residues 457–492; red closed circles) saturates rapidly, consistent with an unfolded peptide31. For comparison, two peptides corresponding to the well-ordered α9 helix region (open blue squares and circles) saturate slowly. Data are mean ± s.d. of independently replicated time points (n = 4). For some points, the standard deviation is less than the dimensions of the data symbol. b, The normalized cumulative changes in the hydrogen–deuterium exchange rates (UGDH(FL-dimer) –UGDH(ΔID-dimer)). Most of the kinetics measurements consisted of six independently replicated time points (n = 4), processed to give the mean exchange (red, blue or green bars). Approximately 5% of the data displayed low signal:noise or was missing, and in those cases the means were derived from four or more time points. Results were normalized by dividing by the number of measurements. The propagation error for each peptide is equal to the square root of the sum of all squared standard deviation values for the collective measurement of UGDH(FL-dimer) and UGDH(ΔID-dimer). Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Transient-state analysis of UGDH(FL) and UGDH(ΔID).

a, b, Transient-state analysis of UDP-Xyl binding kinetics using intrinsic protein fluorescence. Six independent progress curves (coloured traces) at different inhibitor concentrations were globally fit (black line) to the allosteric inhibition model (see Fig. 4b) for UGDH(FL) and UGDH(ΔID). Each progress curve was replicated (n ≥ 4) with similar results, and the final kinetic model was refined against the averaged progress curves (see e for fit parameters). c, d, Confidence contour plots depicting how constrained each globally fit parameter is relative to the others, for all progress curves in a and b (parameters are listed in e). e, Table of the microscopic rate constants from global fitting of the progress curves described in a and b. The best fit and s.e.m. were obtained from global nonlinear regression based on the numerical integration of rate equations for the described model (see main text and Methods). Upper and lower limits were obtained from the confidence contour analysis. Kd = (K1K2K3)−1, where Kn = kn/k−n. f, Enzyme hysteresis is observed as a lag in progress curves. Representative progress curves (of n = 6 independent measurements) for both UGDH(FL) (cyan) and UGDH(ΔID) (grey) are fit to equation (4) (black line). Curves are displayed with the y axis offset for clarity. Final results for all replicate curves are displayed in Fig. 4a. Source data

Extended Data Table 1 Data collection and refinement statistics
Extended Data Table 2 Kinetic parameters of all UGDH constructsa
Extended Data Table 3 NAD+ kinetic parameters for UGDHa

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Section 1: hUGDH Dimer [FL and ΔID] Mixed Inhibition

Reporting Summary

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keul, N.D., Oruganty, K., Schaper Bergman, E.T. et al. The entropic force generated by intrinsically disordered segments tunes protein function. Nature 563, 584–588 (2018).

Download citation


  • Entropic Forces
  • Intrinsically Disordered
  • Hydrogen/deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry
  • Allosteric Switch
  • Standard Reaction Buffer

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing