Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Cox et al. reply

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Typical results for experiments with the one-box Hasselmann model.
Fig. 2: Comparison of different emergent relationships.

Data availability

Relevant data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Brown, P. T., Stolpe, M. B. & Caldeira, K. Assumptions for emergent constraints. Nature 563, (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rypdal, M., Fredriksen, H.-B., Rypdal, K. & Steene, R. J. Emergent constraints on climate sensitivity. Nature 563, (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Po-Chedley, S., Proistosescu, C., Armour, K. C. & Santer, B. D. Climate constraint reflects forced signal. Nature 563, (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cox, P. M., Huntingford, C. & Williamson, M. S. Emergent constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity from global temperature variability. Nature 553, 319–322 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hasselmann, K. Stochastic climate models part I. Theory. Tellus 28, 473–485 (1976).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Geoffroy, O. et al. Transient climate cesponse in a two-layer energy-balance model. Part I: analytical solution and parameter calibration using CMIP5 AOGCM experiments. J. Climate 26, 1841–1857 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frost, C. & Thompson, S. G. Correcting for regression dilution bias: comparison of methods for a single predictor variable. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 163, 173–189 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MacMynowski, D. G. et al. The frequency response of temperature and precipitation in a climate model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L16711 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Williamson, M. S., Cox, P. M. & Nijsse, F. J. M. M. Theoretical foundation of emergent constraints: relationships between climate sensitivity and global temperature variability in conceptual models. Dyn. Stat. Clim. Syst. (in the press).

  10. Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim. Change 109, 213 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



The list of co-authors and their order are slightly different from the original study4. F.J.M.M.N. carried-out many statistical tests in response to the accompanying Comments, and has therefore been added to the author list for this Reply. Similarly, M.S.W. carried out substantial new work with simple models, and has therefore been moved to the second-author position. P.M.C. and M.S.W. drafted the response. C.H. provided the time-series data for the CMIP5 models. M.S.W. produced Fig. 1 and Extended Data Fig. 2 using the one- and two-box models. P.M.C. produced Fig. 2 and Extended Data Fig. 1 from the CMIP5 models. F.J.M.M.N. provided statistical expertise and analysed the impact of regression dilution. All authors contributed to the final version of the Reply.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter M. Cox.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Declared none.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Impact of de-trending on the ECS–Ψ relationship in CMIP5 models.

a, Control runs linearly de-trended in a 55-year moving window (r = 0.75). b, Control runs without de-trending (r = 0.45).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Typical results for experiments (i)–(iv) with the two-box model.

As in Figs. 1 and 2, letters represent models given in extended data table 1 in Cox et al.4. Solid lines indicate the emergent relationship and dotted lines are the prediction error.

Extended Data Table 1 Experiments with common models

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cox, P.M., Williamson, M.S., Nijsse, F.J.M.M. et al. Cox et al. reply. Nature 563, E10–E15 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Hasselmann Model
  • Emergent Constraints
  • CMIP5 Models
  • Forcing Time Series
  • Global Temperature Response

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing