Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Subcycle observation of lightwave-driven Dirac currents in a topological surface band

Nature volume 562, pages 396–400 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Harnessing the carrier wave of light as an alternating-current bias may enable electronics at optical clock rates1. Lightwave-driven currents have been assumed to be essential for high-harmonic generation in solids2,3,4,5,6, charge transport in nanostructures7,8, attosecond-streaking experiments9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16 and atomic-resolution ultrafast microscopy17,18. However, in conventional semiconductors and dielectrics, the finite effective mass and ultrafast scattering of electrons limit their ballistic excursion and velocity. The Dirac-like, quasi-relativistic band structure of topological insulators19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29 may allow these constraints to be lifted and may thus open a new era of lightwave electronics. To understand the associated, complex motion of electrons, comprehensive experimental access to carrier-wave-driven currents is crucial. Here we report angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy with subcycle time resolution that enables us to observe directly how the carrier wave of a terahertz light pulse accelerates Dirac fermions in the band structure of the topological surface state of Bi2Te3. While terahertz streaking of photoemitted electrons traces the electromagnetic field at the surface, the acceleration of Dirac states leads to a strong redistribution of electrons in momentum space. The inertia-free surface currents are protected by spin–momentum locking and reach peak densities as large as two amps per centimetre, with ballistic mean free paths of several hundreds of nanometres, opening up a realistic parameter space for all-coherent lightwave-driven electronic devices. Furthermore, our subcycle-resolution analysis of the band structure may greatly improve our understanding of electron dynamics and strong-field interaction in solids.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Concept of subcycle time-resolved ARPES.
Fig. 2: Energy streaking of the photoelectrons by p-polarized THz radiation.
Fig. 3: Acceleration of the electrons within the surface band by s-polarized THz radiation.
Fig. 4: Dynamics of electric current within the surface band.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on request.

References

  1. Krausz, F. & Stockman, M. I. Attosecond metrology: from electron capture to future signal processing. Nat. Photon. 8, 205–213 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vampa, G. et al. Linking high-harmonics from gases and solids. Nature 522, 462–464 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hohenleutner, M. et al. Real-time observation of interfering crystal electrons in high-harmonic generation. Nature 523, 572–575 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Langer, F. et al. Lightwave-driven quasiparticle collisions on a subcycle timescale. Nature 533, 225–229 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garg, M. et al. Multi-petahertz electronic metrology. Nature 538, 359–363 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, H. et al. High-harmonic generation from an atomically thin semiconductor. Nat. Phys. 13, 262–265 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rybka, T. et al. Sub-cycle optical phase control of nanotunnelling in the single-electron regime. Nat. Photon. 10, 667–670 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Higuchi, T., Heide, C., Ullmann, K., Weber, H. B. & Hommelhoff, P. Light-field-driven currents in graphene. Nature 550, 224–228 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miaja-Avila, L. et al. Laser-assisted photoelectric effect from surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 113604 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cavalieri, A. L. et al. Attosecond spectroscopy in condensed matter. Nature 449, 1029–1032 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schultze, M. et al. Attosecond band-gap dynamics in silicon. Science 346, 1348–1352 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Neppl, S. et al. Direct observation of electron propagation and dielectric screening on the atomic length scale. Nature 517, 342–346 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Locher, R. et al. Energy-dependent photoemission delays from noble metal surfaces by attosecond interferometry. Optica 2, 405–410 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Siek, F. et al. Angular momentum-induced delays in solid-state photoemission enhanced by intra-atomic interactions. Science 357, 1274–1277 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Feist, A. et al. Quantum coherent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope. Nature 521, 200–203 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tao, Z. et al. Direct time-domain observation of attosecond final-state lifetimes in photoemission from solids. Science 353, 62–67 (2016).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cocker, T. L. et al. An ultrafast terahertz scanning tunnelling microscope. Nat. Photon. 7, 620–625 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cocker, T. L., Peller, D., Yu, P., Repp, J. & Huber, R. Tracking the ultrafast motion of a single molecule by femtosecond orbital imaging. Nature 539, 263–267 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, H. J. et al. Topological insulators in Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface. Nat. Phys. 5, 438–442 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, Y. L. et al. Experimental realization of a three-dimensional topological insulator, Bi2Te3. Science 325, 178–181 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuroda, K., Reimann, J., Güdde, J. & Höfer, U. Generation of transient photocurrents in the topological surface state of Sb2Te3 by direct optical excitation with midinfrared pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 076801 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahmood, F. et al. Selective scattering between Floquet–Bloch and Volkov states in a topological insulator. Nat. Phys. 12, 306–310 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Olbrich, P. et al. Room-temperature high-frequency transport of Dirac fermions in epitaxially grown Sb2Te3- and Bi2Te3-based topological insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 096601 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Souma, S. et al. Direct measurement of the out-of-plane spin texture in the Dirac-cone surface state of a topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 216803 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sobota, J. A. et al. Ultrafast optical excitation of a persistent surface-state population in the topological insulator Bi2Se3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 117403 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kastl, C., Karnetzky, C., Karl, H. & Holleitner, A. W. Ultrafast helicity control of surface currents in topological insulators with near-unity fidelity. Nat. Commun. 6, 6617 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Minami, Y. et al. Terahertz-induced acceleration of massive Dirac electrons in semimetal bismuth. Sci. Rep. 5, 15870 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Braun, L. et al. Ultrafast photocurrents at the surface of the three-dimensional topological insulator Bi2Se3. Nat. Commun. 7, 13259 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Güdde, J., Rohleder, M., Meier, T., Koch, S. W. & Höfer, U. Time-resolved investigation of coherently controlled electric currents at a metal surface. Science 318, 1287–1291 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hebling, J., Yeh, K.-L., Hoffmann, M. C., Bartal, B. & Nelson, K. A. Generation of high-power terahertz pulses by tilted-pulse-front excitation and their application possibilities. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 25, 6–19 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kokh, K. A. et al. Melt growth of bulk Bi2Te3 crystals with a natural p-n junction. CrystEngComm 16, 581–584 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hecht, E. Optics 4th edn, Ch. 4 (Pearson Addison-Wesley, New York, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Richter, W., Köhler, H. & Becker, C.R. Raman and far-infrared investigation of phonons in the rhombohedral V2-VI3 compounds Bi2Te3, Bi2Se3, Sb2Te3 and Bi2(Te1−xSex)3 (0 < x < 1), (Bi1−ySby)2Te3 (0 < y < 1). Phys. Status Solidi B 84, 619–628 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ziman, J. M. Principles of the Theory of Solids 2nd edn, Ch. 7 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1979).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Gorbachuk, N. P. & Sidorko, V. R. Heat capacity and enthalpy of Bi2Si3 and Bi2Te3 in the temperature range 58–1012 K. Powder Metall. Met. Ceramics 43, 284–290 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Höfer for discussions. The work in Marburg was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through SFB 1083 and grant number HO 2295/7 (SPP 1666). Work in Regensburg was supported by the DFG through grant numbers HU 1598/2-1 and SFB 1277 (Project A05) and by the European Research Council through grant number 305003 (QUANTUMsubCYCLE). O.E.T. and K.A.K. were supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project number17-12-01047). A.K. was financially supported by KAKENHI number 17H06138.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks I. Katayama, S. Zhou and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    J. Reimann, J. Güdde & U. Höfer

  2. Department of Physics, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

    S. Schlauderer, C. P. Schmid, F. Langer, S. Baierl, C. Lange & R. Huber

  3. V.S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia

    K. A. Kokh

  4. Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia

    K. A. Kokh & O. E. Tereshchenko

  5. A.V. Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia

    O. E. Tereshchenko

  6. Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

    A. Kimura

Authors
  1. J. Reimann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Schlauderer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. P. Schmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Langer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Baierl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. K. A. Kokh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. O. E. Tereshchenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. A. Kimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. C. Lange
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. J. Güdde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. U. Höfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. R. Huber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.G., U.H. and R.H. conceived the study. J.R., S.S., C.P.S., F.L., S.B. and J.G. carried out the experiment. K.A.K., O.E.T. and A.K. provided the samples and performed the transport measurements. J.R., C.L., J.G. and U.H. carried out the theoretical modelling. All authors analysed the data, discussed the results and contributed to writing the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to U. Höfer or R. Huber.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Optical set-up.

a, THz generation via tilted pulse fronts in lithium niobate (LiNbO3). After the laser beam from the titanium:sapphire amplifier system has been reduced in diameter by a reflective telescope, a grating (G) induces a pulse front tilt. Cylindrical lenses (CL) image and focus the beam into a cryogenically cooled LiNbO3 crystal, where optical rectification generates intense THz radiation. A pair of wire-grid polarizers (P) controls the polarization state. b, Electro-optically detected THz waveform after transmission through the fused silica window of the vacuum chamber. Inset, amplitude spectrum of the transient shown in a. c, Set-up for generating UV pulses for photoemission. A lens (L; focal length, 1 m) gently focuses the fundamental titanium:sapphire pulses. A beam splitter (BS) separates 90% of the intensity for second-harmonic generation in a BBO crystal (SHG-BBO). Subsequent dispersion and polarization control is employed using a birefringent calcite plate and a dual-half-wave plate (Dual-λ/2). The third harmonic is generated in another BBO crystal (THG-BBO), separated from the fundamental pulses with a beam splitter (BS), and spatially and temporally (Delay) overlapped with the remaining fundamental pulses to generate the sum-frequency at the fourth harmonic (FHG-BBO). d, The resulting spectrum of the fourth harmonic is centred at λc = 201 nm with a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 2.8 nm, corresponding to a Fourier limit of 22 fs.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Determination of the reflectivity of Bi2Te3.

a, Electro-optically detected THz transients after reflection off a Bi2Te3 (red) and a gold reference (blue) surface kept at a temperature of 77 K. b, Amplitude spectra of the field traces in a normalized to the amplitude of the gold spectrum. c, Reflection coefficient rp (black spheres) for parallel incidence obtained by dividing the amplitude spectra from Bi2Te3 and gold. The orange curve describes the reflection coefficient rp calculated using the corresponding Fresnel formula with a Drude–Lorentz model for the dielectric function of Bi2Te3 (see equation (1)). d, Transmission coefficient ts calculated using the modelled dielectric function.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Comparison of scattering mechanisms.

a–l, Calculated distribution functions at different delay times t for the experimental THz waveform with an amplitude of 2.4 kV cm−1. Experimental broadening is not accounted for. The Boltzmann equation used to compute these results includes only the relaxation term (a–f) or only the effective backscattering term (g–l).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Broadening of the electron distribution.

a–c, Experimental distribution functions (red and blue circles) for different delay times t compared to the equilibrium Fermi–Dirac distribution (solid black line).

Extended Data Fig. 5 Local current density in Bi2Te3.

a, Calculated current density j (colour scale) as a function of the delay time t and the electron excursion in the surface layer of Bi2Te3. The excursion was evaluated using the extracted scattering times of the charge carriers within the topologically protected surface state. The intense THz fields coherently drive Dirac fermions over several hundred nanometres before they undergo scattering. b, The red solid curve shows the simulated current dynamics calculated for scattering times of \({\tau }_{{\rm{R}}}={\tau }_{k\bar{k}}=1\hspace{2.22144pt}{\rm{ps}}\); the THz electric field is depicted as a dashed black curve.

Supplementary information

Video 1

Time-domain video of THz-accelerated Dirac fermions in the surface 2 bands of Bi2Te3. a, Angle-resolved photoemission spectra of the topologically protected surface band in Bi2Te3 as a function of the delay time, t, between an s-polarized THz field and the UV probe. The THz electric field directly accelerates Dirac fermions within the bands, transiently inducing an asymmetric occupation in momentum space and a net electron current flowing on the sample surface. b, THz waveform ETHz as retrieved via momentum streaking of the photoemitted electrons. The blue sphere traces the delay time of the respective photoemission spectrum shown in a.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reimann, J., Schlauderer, S., Schmid, C.P. et al. Subcycle observation of lightwave-driven Dirac currents in a topological surface band. Nature 562, 396–400 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0544-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0544-x

Keywords

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing