Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Does the galaxy NGC1052–DF2 falsify Milgromian dynamics?

Nature volume 561, pagesE4–E5(2018)Cite this article

Subjects

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

Rent or Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: MOND velocity dispersion and external field.

References

  1. 1.

    van Dokkum, P. et al. A galaxy lacking dark matter. Nature 555, 629–632 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Milgrom, M. A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. Astrophys. J. 270, 365–370 (1983).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Famaey, B. & McGaugh, S. S. Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND): observational phenomenology and relativistic extensions. Living Rev. Relativ. 15, 10 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Haghi, H. et al. Testing fundamental physics with distant star clusters: theoretical models for pressure-supported stellar systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 395, 1549–1557 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ploeckinger, S. et al. Tidal dwarf galaxies in cosmological simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 474, 580–596 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bekenstein, J. & Milgrom, M. Does the missing mass problem signal the breakdown of Newtonian gravity? Astrophys. J. 286, 7–14 (1984).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kroupa, P. The dark matter crisis: falsification of the current standard model of cosmology. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 29, 395–433 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Milgrom, M. The modified dynamics as a vacuum effect. Phys. Lett. A 253, 273–279 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Milgrom, M. Solutions for the modified Newtonian dynamics field equation. Astrophys. J. 302, 617–625 (1986).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    McGaugh, S. S. MOND prediction for the velocity dispersion of the “feeble giant” Crater II. Astrophys. J. 832, L8 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Thomas, G. F. et al. Stellar streams as gravitational experiments. II. Asymmetric tails of globular cluster streams. Astron. Astrophys. 609, A44 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Beers, T. C., Flynn, K. & Gebhardt, K. Measures of location and scale for velocities in clusters of galaxies - a robust approach. Astron. J. 100, 32–46 (1990).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fernández-Ontiveros, J. A., López-Sanjuan, C., Montes, M., Prieto, M. A. & Acosta-Pulido, J. A. The most recent burst of star formation in the massive elliptical galaxy NGC 1052. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 411, L21–L25 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bellstedt, S. et al. The SLUGGS survey: a comparison of total-mass profiles of early type galaxies from observations and cosmological simulations, to 4 effective radii. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 476, 4543–4564 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Londrillo, P. & Nipoti, C. N-MODY: a code for collisionless N-body simulations in modified Newtonian dynamics. Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital. Suppl. 13, 89 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

    Pavel Kroupa, Hosein Haghi & Akram Hasani Zonoozi

  2. Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Astronomical Institute, Prague, Czech Republic

    Pavel Kroupa & Jörg Dabringhausen

  3. Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences, Department of Physics, Zanjan, Iran

    Hosein Haghi & Akram Hasani Zonoozi

  4. School of Astronomy, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran

    Behnam Javanmardi

  5. Departement Physik, Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Oliver Müller

  6. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, University of Saint Andrews, Saint Andrews, UK

    Indranil Banik & Hongsheng Zhao

  7. CAS Key Laboratory for Research in Galaxies and Cosmology, Department of Astronomy, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

    Xufen Wu

  8. School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

    Xufen Wu

  9. Department of Physics and Astronomy, LaserLaB, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Hongsheng Zhao

Authors
  1. Pavel Kroupa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hosein Haghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Behnam Javanmardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akram Hasani Zonoozi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Oliver Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Indranil Banik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xufen Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hongsheng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jörg Dabringhausen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.K. conceived the work and wrote the manuscript; H.H. and A.H.Z. performed the external field effect calculations; O.M. and B.J. contributed observational expertise on galaxies; I.B., X.W. and H.Z. contributed MOND expertise; J.D. contributed dwarf galaxy expertise. All co-authors contributed to the manuscript with comments and passages.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Kroupa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Declared none.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains the external field effect calculation in MOND

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kroupa, P., Haghi, H., Javanmardi, B. et al. Does the galaxy NGC1052–DF2 falsify Milgromian dynamics?. Nature 561, E4–E5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0429-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Tidal Dwarf Galaxies
  • Globular Cluster Velocities
  • Surface Brightness Fluctuation Method
  • Velocity Dispersion
  • Primordial Dwarf

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing