Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ferroelectric switching of a two-dimensional metal


A ferroelectric is a material with a polar structure whose polarity can be reversed (switched) by applying an electric field1,2. In metals, itinerant electrons screen electrostatic forces between ions, which explains in part why polar metals are very rare3,4,5,6,7. Screening also excludes external electric fields, apparently ruling out the possibility of ferroelectric switching. However, in principle, a thin enough polar metal could be sufficiently penetrated by an electric field to have its polarity switched. Here we show that the topological semimetal WTe2 provides an embodiment of this principle. Although monolayer WTe2 is centro-symmetric and thus non-polar, the stacked bulk structure is polar. We find that two- or three-layer WTe2 exhibits spontaneous out-of-plane electric polarization that can be switched using gate electrodes. We directly detect and quantify the polarization using graphene as an electric-field sensor8. Moreover, the polarization states can be differentiated by conductivity and the carrier density can be varied to modify the properties. The temperature at which polarization vanishes is above 350 kelvin, and even when WTe2 is sandwiched between graphene layers it retains its switching capability at room temperature, demonstrating a robustness suitable for applications in combination with other two-dimensional materials9,10,11,12.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Evidence for ferroelectric switching in WTe2.
Fig. 2: Detecting the out-of-plane polarization.
Fig. 3: Gate tuning of the ferroelectric behaviour.


  1. Dawber, M., Rabe, K. M. & Scott, J. F. Physics of thin-film ferroelectric oxides. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1083–1130 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott, J. F. Applications of modern ferroelectrics. Science 315, 954–959 (2007).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, P. W. & Blount, E. I. Symmetry considerations on martensitic transformations: ‘ferroelectric’ metals? Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 217–219 (1965).

    Article  ADS  MATH  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shi, Y. et al. A ferroelectric-like structural transition in a metal. Nat. Mater. 12, 1024–1027 (2013).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Benedek, N. A. & Birol, T. ‘Ferroelectric’ metals reexamined: fundamental mechanisms and design considerations for new materials. J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 4000–4015 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, T. H. et al. Polar metals by geometric design. Nature 533, 68–72 (2016).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakai, H. et al. Critical enhancement of thermopower in a chemically tuned polar semimetal MoTe2. Sci. Adv. 2, e1601378 (2016).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rajapitamahuni, A., Hoffman, J., Ahn, C. H. & Hong, X. Examining graphene field effect sensors for ferroelectric thin film studies. Nano Lett. 13, 4374–4379 (2013).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, B. et al. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature 546, 270–273 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mak, K. F., Lee, C., Hone, J., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Atomically thin MoS2: a new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136805 (2010).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Novoselov, K. S. et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197–200 (2005).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, Y., Tan, Y. W., Stormer, H. L. & Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene. Nature 438, 201–204 (2005).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bune, A. V. et al. Two-dimensional ferroelectric films. Nature 391, 874–877 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, L. W. & Rappe, A. M. Thin-film ferroelectric materials and their applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16087 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shirodkar, S. N. & Waghmare, U. V. Emergence of ferroelectricity at a metal-semiconductor transition in a 1T monolayer of MoS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 157601 (2014).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, F. et al. Room-temperature ferroelectricity in CuInP2S6 ultrathin flakes. Nat. Commun. 7, 12357 (2016).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fei, R. X., Kang, W. & Yang, L. Ferroelectricity and phase transitions in monolayer group-IV monochalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 097601 (2016).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Soluyanov, A. A. et al. Type-II Weyl semimetals. Nature 527, 495–498 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Qian, X., Liu, J., Fu, L. & Li, J. Quantum spin Hall effect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Science 346, 1344–1347 (2014).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fei, Z. et al. Edge conduction in monolayer WTe2. Nat. Phys. 13, 677–682 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang, S. et al. Quantum spin Hall state in monolayer 1T′-WTe2. Nat. Phys. 13, 683–687 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, S. et al. Observation of the quantum spin Hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal. Science 359, 76–79 (2018).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fatemi, V. et al. Magnetoresistance and quantum oscillations of an electrostatically tuned semimetal-to-metal transition in ultrathin WTe2. Phys. Rev. B 95, 041410(R) (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Strukov, B. A. & Levanyuk, A. P. Ferroelectric Phenomena in Crystals: Physical Foundations 193–224 (Springer, Berlin, 1998).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Catalan, G., Seidel, J., Ramesh, R. & Scott, J. F. Domain wall nanoelectronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 119–156 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang, K. et al. Discovery of robust in-plane ferroelectricity in atomic-thick SnTe. Science 353, 274–278 (2016).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cochran, W. Crystal stability and the theory of ferroelectricity. Adv. Phys. 9, 387–423 (1960).

    Article  ADS  MATH  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ali, M. N. et al. Large, non-saturating magnetoresistance in WTe2. Nature 514, 205–208 (2014).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao, Y. F. et al. Anisotropic magnetotransport and exotic longitudinal linear magnetoresistance in WTe2 crystals. Phys. Rev. B 92, 206803(R) (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, Y. et al. Observation of Fermi arcs in the type-II Weyl semimetal candidate WTe2. Phys. Rev. B 94, 121113 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dean, C. R. et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 722–726 (2010).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zomer, P. J., Guimaraes, M. H. D., Brant, J. C., Tombros, N. & van Wees, B. J. Fast pick up technique for high quality heterostructures of bilayer graphene and hexagonal boron nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 013101 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank J. Folk, E. Sajadi, A. Levanyuk, T. Birol and A. Andreev for substantial insights. D.H.C. and X.X. were supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, under awards DE-SC0002197 and DE-SC0018171, respectively. Synthesis efforts at ORNL were also supported by the same division of the Department of Energy. Z.Z. was partially supported by the CEM, and NSF MRSEC, under grant DMR-1420451. T.A.P. was supported by AFOSR FA9550-14-1-0277. Z.F., W.Z. and B.S. were supported by the above awards and also by NSF EFRI 2DARE 1433496 and NSF MRSEC 1719797.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks L. Bartels, T. Birol and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



D.H.C. conceived the experiments; Z.Z. and J.Y. grew the crystals; W.Z., T.A.P., Z.F. and M.K.M. fabricated the devices; Z.F., W.Z., T.A.P. and B.S. performed the measurements; D.H.C., X.X., Z.F., W.Z. and T.A.P. analysed the results; and D.H.C., Z.F., T.A.P. and X.X. wrote the paper with comments from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Cobden.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Bilayer WTe2 device.

a, Essential steps in device fabrication. b, Optical image of device B4. The red dashed line outlines the bilayer flake. Scale bar, 5 μm. c, AFM topography image of the central region in b. Scale bar, 2 μm. d, Line cut along the white dashed line in c. The step height matches the expected bilayer thickness, about 1.4 nm.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Thick WTe2 used as a gate.

a, Optical image of device F1, in which a thick (8 nm) WTe2 flake under 24-nm h-BN is used as a gate for a top graphene sheet. Scale bar, 10 μm. b, Schematic cross-section of the device. c, Two-terminal conductance G of the graphene as a function of voltage Vg applied to the WTe2 flake. There is no sign of switching or bistability at any temperature, indicating that no polarization reversal occurs on the WTe2 surface for fields of up to E ≈ 0.125 V nm−1. Inset, close-ups of the graphene Dirac point at 4 K and 300 K.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Switching of an additional bilayer device.

a, Conductance G versus perpendicular electric field E, at temperatures from 4 K to 300 K and a gate doping level of ne = −4 × 1012 cm−2, for device B4. b, Conductance difference ΔG between the two sweep directions of Vb at 200 K, as plotted in Fig. 3d for device B1.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Additional transport measurements and removal of parasitic effects in the polarization measurements.

a, Conductance G versus Vb for the bilayer WTe2 in device B2, measured with the top graphene grounded. The hysteresis occurs in exactly the same range of E as it does in the graphene conductance in Fig. 2b. Note that both ne and E change when Vb is swept. The inset shows a schematic configuration of the measurement. b, Graphene conductance Ggr at 220 K as a function of Vb with the voltage VW on the bilayer WTe2 at 0 mV (blue) and 129 mV (red). The black curve is the difference between the blue and red curves. This subtraction removes most of the Vb dependence of the parasitic current that flows through the top graphene, which is not screened from the bottom gate by the WTe2. Inset, graphene conductance showing the minimum at VW = 129 mV.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Graphene/bilayer WTe2 heterostructure showing hysteresis up to room temperature.

a, b, Device image (a) and schematic cross-section (b). c, The two-terminal conductance G shows bistability at both 5 K and room temperature (300 K), implying that the polarization of the WTe2 is still present in this hybrid structure.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Length-dependent ferroelectric behaviour in trilayer WTe2 for temperatures from 2 K to 300 K.

All measurements are performed at Vb = 0 in two-terminal configurations, where the contact separation ranges from 200 nm to 1,490 nm. For all devices mentioned above and in the main text, the contacts are separated by 1–2 μm. However, if we reduce the contact separation to a few hundred nanometers (270 nm), the metal contacts prevent the polarization from switching. For a contact separation (L) of more than 480 nm, the transfer characteristics show similar hysteric behaviour as in Fig. 1c, d and Extended Data Fig. 3a. Because Vb is always grounded, E and ne change simultaneously as we sweep Vt.

Extended Data Table 1 Thickness of h-BN dielectrics and corresponding areal capacitances for the WTe2 devices

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fei, Z., Zhao, W., Palomaki, T.A. et al. Ferroelectric switching of a two-dimensional metal. Nature 560, 336–339 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing