Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Electrically controlled water permeation through graphene oxide membranes


Controlled transport of water molecules through membranes and capillaries is important in areas as diverse as water purification and healthcare technologies1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Previous attempts to control water permeation through membranes (mainly polymeric ones) have concentrated on modulating the structure of the membrane and the physicochemical properties of its surface by varying the pH, temperature or ionic strength3,8. Electrical control over water transport is an attractive alternative; however, theory and simulations9,10,11,12,13,14 have often yielded conflicting results, from freezing of water molecules to melting of ice14,15,16 under an applied electric field. Here we report electrically controlled water permeation through micrometre-thick graphene oxide membranes17,18,19,20,21. Such membranes have previously been shown to exhibit ultrafast permeation of water17,22 and molecular sieving properties18,21, with the potential for industrial-scale production. To achieve electrical control over water permeation, we create conductive filaments in the graphene oxide membranes via controllable electrical breakdown. The electric field that concentrates around these current-carrying filaments ionizes water molecules inside graphene capillaries within the graphene oxide membranes, which impedes water transport. We thus demonstrate precise control of water permeation, from ultrafast permeation to complete blocking. Our work opens up an avenue for developing smart membrane technologies for artificial biological systems, tissue engineering and filtration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Electrically controlled water permeation through a graphene oxide membrane.
Fig. 2: Current controlled permeation.
Fig. 3: In situ Fourier-transform infrared and X-ray measurements.
Fig. 4: Influence of H3O+ and OH ions on water dynamics inside nanochannels.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Karnik, R. et al. Electrostatic control of ions and molecules in nanofluidic transistors. Nano Lett. 5, 943–948 (2005).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gravelle, S. et al. Optimizing water permeability through the hourglass shape of aquaporins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16367–16372 (2013).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, Z., Wang, W., Xie, R., Ju, X.-J. & Chu, L.-Y. Stimuli-responsive smart gating membranes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 460–475 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiao, K. et al. Electrostatic-charge- and electric-field-induced smart gating for water transportation. ACS Nano 10, 9703–9709 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Z. et al. Polarity-dependent electrochemically controlled transport of water through carbon nanotube membranes. Nano Lett. 7, 697–702 (2007).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hetherington, A. M. & Woodward, F. I. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424, 901–908 (2003).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Borgnia, M. J., Nielsen, S., Engel, A. & Agre, P. Cellular and molecular biology of the aquaporin water channels. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 425–458 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao, C., Nie, S., Tang, M. & Sun, S. Polymeric pH-sensitive membranes—a review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 36, 1499–1520 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kou, J. et al. Electromanipulating water flow in nanochannels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 2351–2355 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, J. et al. Electrostatic gating of a nanometer water channel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3687–3692 (2007).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gong, X. et al. A charge-driven molecular water pump. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 709–712 (2007).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vaitheeswaran, S., Rasaiah, J. C. & Hummer, G. Electric field and temperature effects on water in the narrow nonpolar pores of carbon nanotubes. J. Chem. Phys. 121, 7955–7965 (2004).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Saitta, A. M., Saija, F. & Giaquinta, P. V. Ab initio molecular dynamics study of dissociation of water under an electric field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 207801 (2012).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Qiu, H. & Guo, W. Electromelting of confined monolayer ice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 195701 (2013).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi, E.-M., Yoon, Y.-H., Lee, S. & Kang, H. Freezing transition of interfacial water at room temperature under electric fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 085701 (2005).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Diallo, S. O., Mamontov, E., Nobuo, W., Inagaki, S. & Fukushima, Y. Enhanced translational diffusion of confined water under electric field. Phys. Rev. E 86, 021506 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nair, R. R., Wu, H. A., Jayaram, P. N., Grigorieva, I. V. & Geim, A. K. Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak–tight graphene-based membranes. Science 335, 442–444 (2012).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Joshi, R. K. et al. Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes. Science 343, 752–754 (2014).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun, P., Wang, K. & Zhu, H. Recent developments in graphene-based membranes: structure, mass-transport mechanism and potential applications. Adv. Mater. 28, 2287–2310 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, G., Jin, W. & Xu, N. Graphene-based membranes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 5016–5030 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Abraham, J. et al. Tunable sieving of ions using graphene oxide membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 546–550 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Radha, B. et al. Molecular transport through capillaries made with atomic-scale precision. Nature 538, 222–225 (2016).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kao, K.-C. Dielectric Phenomena in Solids: With Emphasis on Physical Concepts of Electronic Processes Ch. 8 (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Acik, M. et al. The role of oxygen during thermal reduction of graphene oxide studied by infrared absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 19761–19781 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hontoria-Lucas, C., López-Peinado, A. J., López-González, J. D., Rojas-Cervantes, M. L. & Martín-Aranda, R. M. Study of oxygen-containing groups in a series of graphite oxides: physical and chemical characterization. Carbon 33, 1585–1592 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Konkena, B. & Vasudevan, S. Understanding aqueous dispersibility of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide through pKa measurements. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 867–872 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jackson, J. D. Surface charges on circuit wires and resistors play three roles. Am. J. Phys. 64, 855–870 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Marcus, A. The electric field associated with a steady current in long cylindrical conductor. Am. J. Phys. 9, 225–226 (1941).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, L. et al. Ion sieving in graphene oxide membranes via cationic control of interlayer spacing. Nature 550, 380–383 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tielrooij, K. J., Garcia-Araez, N., Bonn, M. & Bakker, H. J. Cooperativity in ion hydration. Science 328, 1006–1009 (2010).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Siegel, J., Lyutakov, O., Rybka, V., Kolská, Z. & Svorčík, V. Properties of gold nanostructures sputtered on glass. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6, 96 (2011).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Dwyer, J. J. Dielectric breakdown in solids. Adv. Phys. 7, 349–394 (1958).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim, S. K. et al. Conductive graphitic channel in graphene oxide-based memristive devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 7406–7414 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Eda, G. et al. Graphene oxide gate dielectric for graphene-based monolithic field effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 133108 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Standley, B., Mendez, A., Schmidgall, E. & Bockrath, M. Graphene-graphite oxide field-effect transistors. Nano Lett. 12, 1165–1169 (2012).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee, J. S., Lee, S. & Noh, T. W. Resistive switching phenomena: a review of statistical physics approaches. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2, 031303 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Qin, S. et al. A physics/circuit-based switching model for carbon-based resistive memory with sp2/sp3 cluster conversion. Nanoscale 4, 6658–6663 (2012).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen, C. et al. Annealing a graphene oxide film to produce a free standing high conductive graphene film. Carbon 50, 659–667 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Borini, S. et al. Ultrafast graphene oxide humidity sensors. ACS Nano 7, 11166–11173 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Pei, S. & Cheng, H. The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 50, 3210–3228 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Park, S. et al. Colloidal suspensions of highly reduced graphene oxide in a wide variety of organic solvents. Nano Lett. 9, 1593–1597 (2009).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ganguly, A., Sharma, S., Papakonstantinou, P. & Hamilton, J. Probing the thermal deoxygenation of graphene oxide using high-resolution in situ X-ray-based spectroscopies. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 17009–17019 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Müller, R. A semiquantitative treatment of surface charges in DC circuits. Am. J. Phys. 80, 782–788 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics 3rd edn, Ch. 1, 12–14 (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Geissler, P. L., Dellago, C., Chandler, D., Hutter, J. & Parrinello, M. Autoionization in liquid water. Science 291, 2121–2124 (2001).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mafé, S., Ramírez, P. & Alcaraz, A. Electric field-assisted proton transfer and water dissociation at the junction of a fixed-charge bipolar membrane. Chem. Phys. Lett. 294, 406–412 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Pinkerton, T. D. et al. Electric field effects in ionization of water–ice layers on platinum. Langmuir 15, 851–856 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wilson, N. R. et al. Graphene oxide: structural analysis and application as a highly transparent support for electron microscopy. ACS Nano 3, 2547–2556 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Loh, K. P., Bao, Q., Eda, G. & Chhowalla, M. Graphene oxide as a chemically tunable platform for optical applications. Nat. Chem. 2, 1015–1024 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).

    Article  ADS  MATH  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Vácha, R., Buch, V., Milet, A., Devlin, J. P. & Jungwirth, P. Autoionization at the surface of neat water: is the top layer pH neutral, basic, or acidic? Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9, 4736–4747 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Vácha, R., Horinek, D., Berkowitz, M. L. & Jungwirth, P. Hydronium and hydroxide at the interface between water and hydrophobic media. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 4975–4980 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Mills, R. Self-diffusion in normal and heavy water in the range 1-45.deg. J. Phys. Chem. 77, 685–688 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Meyer, B. et al. Partial dissociation of water leads to stable superstructures on the surface of zinc oxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 6641–6645 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Brodskaya, E., Alexander, P. L. & Aatto, L. Investigation of water clusters containing OH- and H3O+ ions in atmospheric conditions. A molecular dynamics simulation study. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 6479–6487 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Huang, H. et al. Salt concentration, pH and pressure controlled separation of small molecules through lamellar graphene oxide membranes. Chem. Commun. 49, 5963–5965 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Royal Society, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK (EP/K016946/1, EP/N013670/1 and EP/P00119X/1), British Council (award reference number 279336045), European Research Council (contract 679689) and Lloyd’s Register Foundation. We thank J. Waters for assisting with X-ray measurements and G. Yu for electrical measurements.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks H. Fang, N. Koratkar, B. Mi and H. B. Park for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



R.R.N. initiated and supervised the project. K.-G.Z. performed the experiment and analysed the data with help from K.S.V. and R.R.N.; K.S.V. carried out the PF TUNA and Raman characterization and analysis. C.T.C. carried out the mass spectroscopy. K.H., J.A. and Y.S. helped in sample preparation, characterization and data analysis. K.S.V., M.N.-A., H.G.-K., K.S.N. and F.M.P. performed the theoretical modelling and simulations. J.C.Z. and A.P. performed the XPS characterizations. O.P.M., V.G.K. and A.N.G. performed the infrared characterizations. A.K.G. contributed to theoretical discussions. R.R.N., K.S.V., K.-G.Z. and K.S.N. co-wrote the paper. All authors contributed to discussions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to K.-G. Zhou, K. S. Vasu or R. R. Nair.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Metal–GO–metal sandwiched membranes.

a, Fabrication procedure for the metal–GO–metal sandwich membrane. b, Photograph of one of our metal–GO–metal sandwich membranes attached to the PET sheet (step 2 in a). Scale bar, 6 mm. This was further attached onto another plastic disk to seal the metal container for gravimetric testing. c, SEM image showing the discontinuities and voids in a 10-nm gold thin film on a GO membrane. Scale bar, 150 nm. d, Water permeation rate of metal–GO–metal sandwiched membranes as a function of gold electrode thickness. The dotted line is a guide to the eye. Water permeation rates of a bare porous silver (Ag) support (red filled circle) and a commercial polyamide nanofiltration membrane (green filled circle) are provided for comparison. Inset, SEM image of a 50-nm-thick gold thin film on a GO membrane. Scale bar, 150 nm.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Conducting filament formation in a GO membrane and its electrical characterization.

a, IV characteristics during the first voltage sweep show a sudden increase in the current for membranes exposed to humid conditions, suggesting partial electrical breakdown of the GO membrane and conducting filament formation. b, In-plane and out-of-plane IV characteristics of the GO membrane after filament formation. Inset, out-of-plane IV characteristics of the GO membrane at 100% RH and vacuum.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Raman and AFM characterization of conducting filaments in GO membranes.

a, Topographical SEM image of a GO membrane after the formation of conducting filaments. bd, Raman intensity ratio (ID/IG) mapping of D and G bands for a pristine GO membrane (b) and a GO membrane after conducting filaments have formed (c, d). c, Raman imaging from the membrane surface close to the positive electrode (about 200 nm away). d, Raman imaging from the membrane surface close to the negative electrode (about 100 nm away). e, f, The Raman spectra from the dark blue and green regions in c, respectively. gj, Topography and the corresponding TUNA current image of pristine GO (g and h, respectively) and conducting GO (i and j) membranes (filament formed at 100% RH) exfoliated on a gold-thin-film-coated Si substrate. The conducting filaments are marked by red circles. Scale bars, 1 μm. k, Out-of-plane IV characteristics of a conducting GO membrane with a diameter of about 7 mm before (parent membrane) and after dividing into four equal pieces. Inset, schematic of the structure of conducting carbon filaments in the GO membrane.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Influence of intercalated water and oxygen content on conducting filament formation in GO membranes.

a, b, Topography and the corresponding TUNA current images of GO membranes after filament formation at 40% RH (a and b, respectively) and inside liquid water (c and d). e, IV characteristics of pristine and partially reduced (‘pr’) GO membranes during the first voltage sweep at 100% RH show partial breakdown. f, TUNA current image of a partially reduced GO membrane after filament formation. The conducting filaments are marked by red circles. Scale bars, 2 μm.

Extended Data Fig. 5 XPS characterization of GO membranes.

a, C 1s spectrum from a pristine GO membrane. b, c, C 1s spectra from GO membranes used for the electrically controlled permeation experiments after filament formation, from a freshly cleaved membrane surface close to the inner middle region (b) and close to the positive electrode (c). Black lines, raw data; red lines, the fitting envelope; blue lines, deconvolved peaks attributed to the chemical environments indicated.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Mass spectrometry to probe electrically controlled water permeation.

a, Schematic of the experimental set-up for mass spectrometry measurements. A throttle valve (TV) controls the gas inlet with a capacitance gauge (CG) used to measure the upstream pressure. An isolation valve (IV) isolates upstream and downstream sides of the membrane. A rotary pump (RP1) evacuates the feed and the permeate side to 1 mbar. The quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) measures the downstream partial pressure. A turbomolecular pump (TP) backed by a rotary pump (RP2) evacuates the high-vacuum chamber of the mass spectrometer. An active ion gauge (IG) measures the pressure down to 1 × 10−9 torr in the high-vacuum side. b, The partial pressure of He, H2, O2 and H2O at the permeate side as a function of time at different currents through the membrane. No detectable change is observed in the partial pressures of He, H2 and O2 under different currents through the membrane. c, The partial pressure of H2O as a function of the current across the GO membrane and the corresponding IV characteristics (colour-coded axes).The dotted lines are guides to the eye.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Electrically controlled liquid water permeation in GO membranes.

a, Schematic of the experimental set-up. b, IV characteristics of a Au/GO/Ag membrane during the first voltage sweep while it is immersed in liquid water in the experimental set-up. c, Liquid water permeation rate as a function of current across the membrane after filament formation and the corresponding IV characteristics (colour-coded axes). Sample-to-sample variation in the permeation is less than 30% (three samples measured).

Extended Data Fig. 8 In situ membrane temperature and water absorption measurements.

a, Measured membrane temperature as a function of the current flowing across the membrane during the electrically controlled water permeation experiment. Error bars, standard deviation from 10 different measurements across the sample. b, The weight intake of a Au/GO/Ag membrane (1-μm-thick GO) at different humidity and electric current values. Weight intake is calculated with respect to the weight of the membrane at 0% RH. The shaded areas show the time during humidity sweeps.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Electric field around a current-carrying conductor.

a, Schematic of the application of a voltage V across an electrically conducting wire with radius a and length L; b is the point at which the potential decays to zero; r represents any point between a and b where the electric field E is calculated. b, Magnitude of E and its spatial distribution as a function of r and z around a conductive filament with 1-V potential difference across the ends and with 1-nA current flow.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Molecular dynamics simulations.

a, Side view of our molecular dynamics simulation set-up used to study the flow of water mixed with H3O+ and OH ions in the graphene capillary. The model contains two boxes connected by a graphene capillary. At the beginning of the simulation, water was mixed with H3O+ and OH ions (red and white dots). By moving the left wall (subjected to external pressure) of the box towards the capillary, the water flow is created and the right box is gradually filled. The arrow indicates the direction of the external pressure applied on the left wall of the box. b, c, Number of water molecules in the capillary (b) and number of water molecules in the right box (c) for pure water and water with ions once pressure is applied to the left box (colour-coded labels). d, Water flow rate as a function of the concentration of ions inside the capillary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, KG., Vasu, K.S., Cherian, C.T. et al. Electrically controlled water permeation through graphene oxide membranes. Nature 559, 236–240 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing