The observation that BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient cells are sensitive to inhibitors of poly(ADP–ribose) polymerase (PARP) has spurred the development of cancer therapies that use these inhibitors to target deficiencies in homologous recombination1. The cytotoxicity of PARP inhibitors depends on PARP trapping, the formation of non-covalent protein–DNA adducts composed of inhibited PARP1 bound to DNA lesions of unclear origins1,2,3,4. To address the nature of such lesions and the cellular consequences of PARP trapping, we undertook three CRISPR (clustered regularly interspersed palindromic repeats) screens to identify genes and pathways that mediate cellular resistance to olaparib, a clinically approved PARP inhibitor1. Here we present a high-confidence set of 73 genes, which when mutated cause increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. In addition to an expected enrichment for genes related to homologous recombination, we discovered that mutations in all three genes encoding ribonuclease H2 sensitized cells to PARP inhibition. We establish that the underlying cause of the PARP-inhibitor hypersensitivity of cells deficient in ribonuclease H2 is impaired ribonucleotide excision repair5. Embedded ribonucleotides, which are abundant in the genome of cells deficient in ribonucleotide excision repair, are substrates for cleavage by topoisomerase 1, resulting in PARP-trapping lesions that impede DNA replication and endanger genome integrity. We conclude that genomic ribonucleotides are a hitherto unappreciated source of PARP-trapping DNA lesions, and that the frequent deletion of RNASEH2B in metastatic prostate cancer and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia could provide an opportunity to exploit these findings therapeutically.
Access optionsAccess options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
We thank Y. Pommier and N. Huang for discussions and communication of unpublished results; R. Szilard for critical reading of the manuscript; R. Greenberg for HeLa DR-GFP cells; the IGMM Imaging and Flow Cytometry facilities for assistance and T. Heffernan and N. Feng for providing talazoparib. M.Z. is a Banting postdoctoral fellow. O.M. is supported by an EMBO Long-Term Fellowship (ALTF 7-2015), the European Commission FP7 (Marie Curie Actions, LTFCOFUND2013, GA-2013-609409) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (P2ZHP3_158709). Work in the laboratory of A.P.J. was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC, U127580972); Work in the laboratory of T.S. was supported by Bloodwise (14031). Work in the laboratories of S.A. and J.M. was supported by grants from the Canadian Cancer Society (#705045; to S.A.) and CIHR (MOP- 142375; to J.M.). Work in the laboratory of J.d.B. was supported by the Movember Foundation, Prostate Cancer UK, the US Department of Defense, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, Stand Up To Cancer, Cancer Research UK, and the UK Department of Health through an Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre grant and work in the laboratory of V.G.B. was supported by Cancer Research UK (grants C157/A25140 and C157/A15703). D.D. is the Thomas Kierans Chair in Mechanisms of Cancer Development and a Canada Research Chair (Tier I) in the Molecular Mechanisms of Genome Integrity. Work in the laboratory of D.D. was funded through CIHR grant FDN143343, Canadian Cancer Society (CCS grants #70389 and #705644), as well as a Grant-in-Aid from the Krembil Foundation.
Nature thanks A. Chabes, M. Tarsounas and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Extended data figures and tables
About this article
Current Genetics (2018)