China has responded to a national land-system sustainability emergency via an integrated portfolio of large-scale programmes. Here we review 16 sustainability programmes, which invested US$378.5 billion (in 2015 US$), covered 623.9 million hectares of land and involved over 500 million people, mostly since 1998. We find overwhelmingly that the interventions improved the sustainability of China’s rural land systems, but the impacts are nuanced and adverse outcomes have occurred. We identify some key characteristics of programme success, potential risks to their durability, and future research needs. We suggest directions for China and other nations as they progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations’ Agenda 2030.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from $8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Marks, R. B. China: An Environmental History (ed. Lanham, M. A.) 2nd edn (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, 2017). Key, authoritative, and recently updated account of China’s environmental history.

  2. 2.

    Xu, J., Yin, R., Li, Z. & Liu, C. China’s ecological rehabilitation: unprecedented efforts, dramatic impacts, and requisite policies. Ecol. Econ. 57, 595–607 (2006). Early overview and background of the Grain for Green Program and the Natural Forest Conservation Program and assessment of their challenges.

  3. 3.

    United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Annex A/RES/70/1. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (UN, 2015).

  4. 4.

    Gao, L. & Bryan, B. A. Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability. Nature 544, 217–222 (2017).

  5. 5.

    Delang, C. O. & Yuan, Z. China's Grain for Green Program: A Review of the Largest Ecological Restoration and Rural Development Program in the World (Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2015). Deep review of the Grain for Green Program which thoroughly covers multiple environmental, policy, and socio-economic details.

  6. 6.

    Yin, R. An Integrated Assessment of China's Ecological Restoration Programs (Springer, East Lansing, 2009). Collection of articles describing several of China’s sustainability programmes.

  7. 7.

    Liu, J., Ouyang, Z., Yang, W., Xu, W. & Li, S. in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity Vol. 3, 372–384 (Academic Press, Waltham, 2013).

  8. 8.

    Liu, J., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Tam, C. & Chen, X. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9477–9482 (2008). High-profile critical assessment that raised awareness of the scale of China’s investment in sustainability.

  9. 9.

    Ouyang, Z. Y. et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science 352, 1455–1459 (2016). National-scale quantitative assessment of the changes in ecosystem services across China, relating these to sustainability investment.

  10. 10.

    Yin, R. S., Yin, G. P. & Li, L. Y. Assessing China’s ecological restoration programs: what’s been done and what remains to be done? Environ. Manage. 45, 442–453 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Yin, R. S. & Yin, G. P. China’s primary programs of terrestrial ecosystem restoration: initiation, implementation, and challenges. Environ. Manage. 45, 429–441 (2010).

  12. 12.

    Liu, J. G. & Diamond, J. China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature 435, 1179–1186 (2005).

  13. 13.

    Liu, J. & Raven, P. H. China’s environmental challenges and implications for the world. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 823–851 (2010).

  14. 14.

    Kahn, M. E. & Zheng, S. Blue Skies over Beijing: Economic Growth and the Environment in China (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2016).

  15. 15.

    Shapiro, J. China's Environmental Challenges (Wiley, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2016).

  16. 16.

    Banister, J. in The Population of Modern China (eds Poston, D. L. & D. Yaukey, D.) 51–57 (Springer, Boston, 1992).

  17. 17.

    He, F., Ge, Q., Dai, J. & Rao, Y. Forest change of China in recent 300 years. J. Geogr. Sci. 18, 59–72 (2008).

  18. 18.

    Elvin, M. The Retreat of the Elephants: An Environmental History of China (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 2004).

  19. 19.

    Mao, Y., Zhao, N. & Yang, X. in Food Security and Farm Land Protection in China Vol. 2 (eds Yang, M. & Fan, G.) 356 (Series on Chinese Economics Research, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2013).

  20. 20.

    Miao, L. et al. Synthesis of China’s land use in the past 300 years. Global Planet. Change 100, 224–233 (2013). Comprehensive synthesis of land-use and population dynamics in China, combining multiple datasets.

  21. 21.

    Miao, L., Zhu, F., Sun, Z., Moore, J. & Cui, X. China’s land-use changes during the past 300 years: a historical perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13, 847 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Hua, L. M. & Squires, V. R. Managing China’s pastoral lands: current problems and future prospects. Land Use Policy 43, 129–137 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Liu, J. & Yang, W. Water sustainability for China and beyond. Science 337, 649–650 (2012).

  24. 24.

    Yu, D. P. et al. Forest management in northeast China: history, problems, and challenges. Environ. Manage. 48, 1122–1135 (2011).

  25. 25.

    Ren, G. et al. Effectiveness of China’s National Forest Protection Program and nature reserves. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1368–1377 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Xu, J. China’s new forests aren’t as green as they seem. Nature 477, 371 (2011). Opinion piece challenging the environmental credentials of China’s large-scale reforestation and afforestation programmes.

  27. 27.

    Ran, L. S., Lu, X. X. & Xu, J. C. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil conservation and sediment loads in China: a critical review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 1384–1415 (2013).

  28. 28.

    Lei, J. & Zhu, L. China’s Implementation of Six Key Forestry Programs. http://www.china.org.cn/e-news/news02-05-14.htm (China Tibet Information Center/State Forestry Administration, 2002).

  29. 29.

    Douglas, I. Land degradation, soil conservation and the sediment load of the Yellow River, China: review and assessment. Land Degrad. Rehabil. 1, 141–151 (1989).

  30. 30.

    Li, X. Y. et al. Patterns of cereal yield growth across China from 1980 to 2010 and their implications for food production and food security. PLoS One 11, e0159061 (2016).

  31. 31.

    PRC Ministry of Agriculture. Notification on National Farmland Quality Grading (Beijing, China, 2014) [in Chinese].

  32. 32.

    Chen, Y. & Tang, H. Desertification in north China: background, anthropogenic impacts and failures in combating it. Land Degrad. Dev. 16, 367–376 (2005).

  33. 33.

    Wang, F., Pan, X., Wang, D., Shen, C. & Lu, Q. Combating desertification in China: Past, present and future. Land Use Policy 31, 311–313 (2013).

  34. 34.

    Feng, Q., Ma, H., Jiang, X. M., Wang, X. & Cao, S. X. What has caused desertification in China? Sci. Rep. 5, 15998 (2015).

  35. 35.

    Wang, X., Chen, F., Hasi, E. & Li, J. Desertification in China: an assessment. Earth Sci. Rev. 88, 188–206 (2008).

  36. 36.

    Xie, X. H. et al. Detection and attribution of changes in hydrological cycle over the Three-North region of China: climate change versus afforestation effect. Agric. For. Meteorol. 203, 74–87 (2015).

  37. 37.

    Cao, S. X., Zhong, B. L., Yue, H., Zeng, H. S. & Zeng, J. H. Development and testing of a sustainable environmental restoration policy on eradicating the poverty trap in China’s Changting County. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10712–10716 (2009). Identifies the importance of a systemic approach and the joint solution of poverty and environmental degradation.

  38. 38.

    Cheng, L. et al. Estimation of the costs of desertification in China: a critical review. Land Degrad. Dev. 29, 975–983 (2016).

  39. 39.

    Shiau, J.-T., Feng, S. & Nadarajah, S. Assessment of hydrological droughts for the Yellow River, China, using copulas. Hydrol. Processes 21, 2157–2163 (2007).

  40. 40.

    Ye, Q. & Glantz, M. H. The 1998 Yangtze Floods: the use of short-term forecasts in the context of seasonal to interannual water resource management. Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Glob. Change 10, 159–182 (2005).

  41. 41.

    Wang, X., Dong, Z., Zhang, J. & Liu, L. Modern dust storms in China: an overview. J. Arid Environ. 58, 559–574 (2004).

  42. 42.

    Ai, N. & Polenski, K. R. Socioeconomic impact analysis of yellow-dust storms: an approach and case study for Beijing. Econ. Syst. Res. 20, 187–203 (2008).

  43. 43.

    Farm Service Agency. Conservation Reserve Program Statistics. https://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/conservation-programs/reports-and-statistics/conservation-reserve-program-statistics/index (United States Department of Agriculture, FSA, 2017).

  44. 44.

    Yang, W. et al. Performance and prospects of payments for ecosystem services programs: evidence from China. J. Environ. Manage. 127, 86–95 (2013).

  45. 45.

    Dong, C., Liu, X. M. & Klein, K. K. Land degradation and population relocation in northern China. Asia Pacif. Viewp. 53, 163–177 (2012).

  46. 46.

    Wang, P. et al. Promise and reality of market-based environmental policy in China: empirical analyses of the ecological restoration program on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Glob. Environ. Change 39, 35–44 (2016).

  47. 47.

    Lei, Y. R., Finlayson, C. M., Thwaites, R., Shi, G. Q. & Cui, L. J. Using government resettlement projects as a sustainable adaptation strategy for climate change. Sustainability 9, 1373 (2017).

  48. 48.

    Ghestem, M. et al. A framework for identifying plant species to be used as ‘ecological engineers’ for fixing soil on unstable slopes. PLoS One 9, e95876 (2014).

  49. 49.

    Li, X. R., Xiao, H. L., He, M. Z. & Zhang, J. G. Sand barriers of straw checkerboards for habitat restoration in extremely arid desert regions. Ecol. Eng. 28, 149–157 (2006).

  50. 50.

    Yang, Z.-Q., Wang, X.-Y. & Zhang, Y.-N. Recent advances in biological control of important native and invasive forest pests in China. Biol. Control 68, 117–128 (2014).

  51. 51.

    Li, M.-M. et al. An overview of the “Three-North” Shelterbelt project in China. For. Stud. China 14, 70–79 (2012).

  52. 52.

    Liao, C., Han, F. & Feng, M. Construction achievement and experience of soil and water conservation. Yangtze River 41, 16–20 (2010) [in Chinese].

  53. 53.

    PRC Information Office of the State Council. New Progress in Development-oriented Poverty Reduction Program for Rural China. http://www.gov.cn/english/official/2011-11/16/content_1994729.htm (PRCIOSC, Beijing, 2011).

  54. 54.

    Li, P. & Wang, X. in Ecological Migration, Development and Transformation: A Study of Migration and Poverty Reduction in Ningxia (eds Li, P. & Wang, X.) 1–19 (Springer, Berlin, 2016).

  55. 55.

    Wang, J. G. Review of the Comprehensive Agricultural Development Program after two decades of development. China State Finance 18, 32–34 (2008) [in Chinese].

  56. 56.

    The World Bank. Forest area (% of land area): China. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.FRST.ZS?locations=CN (The World Bank, 2017).

  57. 57.

    Chen, Y. et al. Balancing green and grain trade. Nat. Geosci. 8, 739–741 (2015).

  58. 58.

    Yang, H. F., Mu, S. J. & Li, J. L. Effects of ecological restoration projects on land use and land cover change and its influences on territorial NPP in Xinjiang, China. Catena 115, 85–95 (2014).

  59. 59.

    Lu, Y. H. et al. Recent ecological transitions in China: greening, browning, and influential factors. Sci. Rep. 5, 8732 (2015). Quantifies the complex spatial distribution of greening/browning across China from 2000–2010 and the influence of sustainability interventions.

  60. 60.

    Viña, A., McConnell, W. J., Yang, H., Xu, Z. & Liu, J. Effects of conservation policy on China’s forest recovery. Sci. Adv. 2, e1500965 (2016).

  61. 61.

    Huang, L. et al. Effects of grassland restoration programs on ecosystems in arid and semiarid China. J. Environ. Manage. 117, 268–275 (2013).

  62. 62.

    Xiong, D. P., Shi, P. L., Zhang, X. Z. & Zou, C. B. Effects of grazing exclusion on carbon sequestration and plant diversity in grasslands of China: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Eng. 94, 647–655 (2016).

  63. 63.

    Mu, S. J. et al. Assessing the impact of restoration-induced land conversion and management alternatives on net primary productivity in Inner Mongolian grassland, China. Global Planet. Change 108, 29–41 (2013).

  64. 64.

    Cai, H. Y., Yang, X. H. & Xu, X. L. Human-induced grassland degradation/restoration in the central Tibetan Plateau: the effects of ecological protection and restoration projects. Ecol. Eng. 83, 112–119 (2015).

  65. 65.

    Piao, S., Fang, J., Liu, H. & Zhu, B. NDVI-indicated decline in desertification in China in the past two decades. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L06402 (2005).

  66. 66.

    Wang, X. M., Zhang, C. X., Hasi, E. & Dong, Z. B. Has the Three Norths Forest Shelterbelt Program solved the desertification and dust storm problems in arid and semiarid China? J. Arid Environ. 74, 13–22 (2010). Critical review finding little unassailable evidence supporting the impact of afforestation programmes on desertification and dust storm mitigation in China and calls for stronger causal analyses.

  67. 67.

    Peng, D. L. et al. The influences of drought and land-cover conversion on inter-annual variation of NPP in the Three-North Shelterbelt Program zone of China based on MODIS data. PLoS One 11, e0158173 (2016).

  68. 68.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Multiple afforestation programs accelerate the greenness in the ‘Three North’ region of China from 1982 to 2013. Ecol. Indic. 61, 404–412 (2016).

  69. 69.

    Li, X. S., Wang, H. Y., Wang, J. Y. & Gao, Z. H. Land degradation dynamic in the first decade of twenty-first century in the Beijing-Tianjin dust and sandstorm source region. Environ. Earth Sci. 74, 4317–4325 (2015).

  70. 70.

    Deng, L., Shangguan, Z.-P. & Li, R. Effects of the Grain-for-Green program on soil erosion in China. Int. J. Sediment Res. 27, 120–127 (2012).

  71. 71.

    Li, C. B. et al. Quantifying the effect of ecological restoration on soil erosion in China’s Loess Plateau region: an application of the MMF approach. Environ. Manage. 45, 476–487 (2010).

  72. 72.

    Zhang, J., Wang, T. & Ge, J. Assessing vegetation cover dynamics induced by policy-driven ecological restoration and implication to soil erosion in southern China. PLoS One 10, e0131352 (2015).

  73. 73.

    Liu, Y. S., Guo, Y. J., Li, Y. R. & Li, Y. H. GIS-based effect assessment of soil erosion before and after gully land consolidation: a case study of Wangjiagou project region, Loess Plateau. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 25, 137–146 (2015).

  74. 74.

    Wang, S. A. et al. Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes. Nat. Geosci. 9, 38–41 (2016).

  75. 75.

    Yang, S. L., Xu, K. H., Milliman, J. D., Yang, H. F. & Wu, C. S. Decline of Yangtze River water and sediment discharge: impact from natural and anthropogenic changes. Sci. Rep. 5, 12581 (2015).

  76. 76.

    An, W. M. et al. Exploring the effects of the “Grain for Green” program on the differences in soil water in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China. Ecol. Eng. 107, 144–151 (2017).

  77. 77.

    Cao, S. X. et al. Excessive reliance on afforestation in China’s arid and semi-arid regions: lessons in ecological restoration. Earth Sci. Rev. 104, 240–245 (2011).

  78. 78.

    Lu, C., Zhao, T., Shi, X. & Cao, S. Ecological restoration by afforestation may increase groundwater depth and create potentially large ecological and water opportunity costs in arid and semiarid China. J. Clean. Prod. 176, 1213–1222 (2018).

  79. 79.

    Cao, S. Impact of China’s large-scale ecological restoration program on the environment and society in arid and semiarid areas of China: achievements, problems, synthesis, and applications. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 317–335 (2011).

  80. 80.

    Cao, S. X., Zhang, J. Z., Chen, L. & Zhao, T. Y. Ecosystem water imbalances created during ecological restoration by afforestation in China, and lessons for other developing countries. J. Environ. Manage. 183, 843–849 (2016).

  81. 81.

    Feng, X. et al. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 1019–1022 (2016). Quantification of the impacts of reforestation and afforestation and the critical state of water resources in the Loess Plateau region.

  82. 82.

    Xu, W. et al. Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1601–1606 (2017). Recent assessment of the representativeness of China’s nature reserve system and opportunities for improvement identifying the importance of payment schemes in shifting rural labour off-farm and reducing direct reliance on natural resources for livelihoods.

  83. 83.

    Zhang, K. R. et al. Sustainability of social-ecological systems under conservation projects: lessons from a biodiversity hotspot in western China. Biol. Conserv. 158, 205–213 (2013).

  84. 84.

    Zhai, D. L., Xu, J. C., Dai, Z. C., Cannon, C. H. & Grumbine, R. E. Increasing tree cover while losing diverse natural forests in tropical Hainan, China. Reg. Environ. Change 14, 611–621 (2014).

  85. 85.

    Wang, X. L., Wang, Y. Q. & Wang, Y. J. Use of exotic species during ecological restoration can produce effects that resemble vegetation invasions and other unintended consequences. Ecol. Eng. 52, 247–251 (2013).

  86. 86.

    Hua, F. et al. Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world’s largest reforestation programme. Nat. Commun. 7, 12717 (2016).

  87. 87.

    Wang, S. L., Tuan, F., Gale, F., Somwaru, A. & Hansen, J. China’s regional agricultural productivity growth in 1985–2007: a multilateral comparison. Agric. Econ. 44, 241–251 (2013).

  88. 88.

    Yang, H. Livestock development in China: animal production, consumption and genetic resources. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 130, 249–251 (2013).

  89. 89.

    Chen, Y.-f. et al. Agricultural policy, climate factors and grain output: evidence from household survey data in rural China. J. Integr. Agric. 12, 169–183 (2013).

  90. 90.

    Zhang, J. China’s success in increasing per capita food production. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 3707–3711 (2011).

  91. 91.

    Lassaletta, L., Billen, G., Grizzetti, B., Anglade, J. & Garnier, J. 50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: the relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 105011 (2014).

  92. 92.

    Maryna, S. et al. Alarming nutrient pollution of Chinese rivers as a result of agricultural transitions. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 024014 (2016).

  93. 93.

    Le, C. et al. Eutrophication of lake waters in China: cost, causes, and control. Environ. Manage. 45, 662–668 (2010).

  94. 94.

    Jin, X. et al. The evaluation of land consolidation policy in improving agricultural productivity in China. Sci. Rep. 7, 2792 (2017).

  95. 95.

    Song, W. & Pijanowski, B. C. The effects of China’s cultivated land balance program on potential land productivity at a national scale. Appl. Geogr. 46, 158–170 (2014).

  96. 96.

    Yan, H., Liu, J., Huang, H. Q., Tao, B. & Cao, M. Assessing the consequence of land use change on agricultural productivity in China. Global Planet. Change 67, 13–19 (2009).

  97. 97.

    Yao, S. & Li, H. Agricultural productivity changes induced by the Sloping Land Conversion Program: an analysis of Wuqi County in the Loess Plateau region. Environ. Manage. 45, 541–550 (2010).

  98. 98.

    Lu, Q., Xu, B., Liang, F., Gao, Z. & Ning, J. Influences of the Grain-for-Green project on grain security in southern China. Ecol. Indic. 34, 616–622 (2013).

  99. 99.

    Yin, R. S., Liu, C., Zhao, M. J., Yao, S. B. & Liu, H. The implementation and impacts of China’s largest payment for ecosystem services program as revealed by longitudinal household data. Land Use Policy 40, 45–55 (2014).

  100. 100.

    Yi, F. J., Sun, D. Q. & Zhou, Y. H. Grain subsidy, liquidity constraints and food security—impact of the grain subsidy program on the grain-sown areas in China. Food Policy 50, 114–124 (2015).

  101. 101.

    Liu, C., Mullan, K., Liu, H., Zhu, W. Q. & Rong, Q. J. The estimation of long term impacts of China’s key priority forestry programs on rural household incomes. J. For. Econ. 20, 267–285 (2014).

  102. 102.

    Gutiérrez Rodríguez, L. et al. China’s conversion of cropland to forest program: a systematic review of the environmental and socioeconomic effects. Environ. Evid. 5, 21 (2016).

  103. 103.

    Liu, C., Lu, J. Z. & Yin, R. S. An estimation of the effects of China’s priority forestry programs on farmers’ income. Environ. Manage. 45, 526–540 (2010).

  104. 104.

    Uchida, E., Rozelle, S. & Xu, J. Conservation payments, liquidity constraints, and off-farm labor: impact of the Grain-for-Green Program on rural households in China. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 91, 70–86 (2009).

  105. 105.

    Li, H., Yao, S. B., Yin, R. S. & Liu, G. Q. Assessing the decadal impact of China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program on household income under enrollment and earning differentiation. For. Policy Econ. 61, 95–103 (2015).

  106. 106.

    Cao, S., Wang, X., Song, Y., Chen, L. & Feng, Q. Impacts of the Natural Forest Conservation Program on the livelihoods of residents of northwestern China: perceptions of residents affected by the program. Ecol. Econ. 69, 1454–1462 (2010).

  107. 107.

    Wang, Z., Song, K. & Hu, L. China’s largest scale ecological migration in the Three-River Headwater region. Ambio 39, 443–446 (2010).

  108. 108.

    Shu, X. in Ecological Migration, Development and Transformation: A Study of Migration and Poverty Reduction in Ningxia (eds Li, P. & Wang, X.) 21–46 (Springer, Berlin, 2016).

  109. 109.

    Xie, Y. Ecological Migrants: The Relocation of China's Ewenki Reindeer Herders (Berghahn Books, New York, 2015).

  110. 110.

    Mao, X. F., Wei, X. Y. & Xia, J. X. Evaluation of ecological migrants’ adaptation to their new living area in Three-River Headwater wetlands, China. Proc. Environ. Sci. 13, 1346–1353 (2012).

  111. 111.

    Chen, X. D., Lupi, F., He, G. M. & Liu, J. G. Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment in payments for ecosystem services. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11812–11817 (2009).

  112. 112.

    UNCTAD. World Investment Report 2014. Investing in the SDGs: An Action Plan. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2014_en.pdf (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Switzerland, 2014).

  113. 113.

    Liu, J. G. et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317, 1513–1516 (2007).

  114. 114.

    Cao, S. X., Shang, D., Yue, H. & Ma, H. A win-win strategy for ecological restoration and biodiversity conservation in southern China. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 044004 (2017).

  115. 115.

    Li, T. et al. Gauging policy-driven large-scale vegetation restoration programmes under a changing environment: their effectiveness and socio-economic relationships. Sci. Total Environ. 607, 911–919 (2017).

  116. 116.

    Liu, J. et al. Pandas and People: Coupling Human and Natural Systems for Sustainability (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2016).

  117. 117.

    Liu, J. et al. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science 347, 1258832 (2015).

  118. 118.

    Bryan, B. A. et al. Land use efficiency: anticipating future demand for land-sector greenhouse gas emissions abatement and managing trade-offs with agriculture, water, and biodiversity. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 4098–4114 (2015).

  119. 119.

    Kates, R. W. et al. Sustainability science. Science 292, 641–642 (2001).

  120. 120.

    Schultz, L., Folke, C., Österblom, H. & Olsson, P. Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7369–7374 (2015).

  121. 121.

    Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. C. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302, 1907–1912 (2003).

  122. 122.

    Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. The 13th Five-Year Plan For Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic Republic of China 2016–2020. http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201612/P020161207645765233498.pdf (CCCPC, Beijing, 2015).

  123. 123.

    Foggin, J. M. Rethinking “ecological migration” and the value of cultural continuity: a response to Wang, Song, and Hu. Ambio 40, 100–101 (2011).

  124. 124.

    Song, C. H. et al. Sustainability of forests created by China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program: a comparison among three sites in Anhui, Hubei and Shanxi. For. Policy Econ. 38, 161–167 (2014).

  125. 125.

    Guo, J. & Gong, P. Forest cover dynamics from Landsat time-series data over Yan’an city on the Loess Plateau during the Grain for Green Project. Int. J. Remote Sens. 37, 4101–4118 (2016).

  126. 126.

    Liu, N., Zhou, L. H. & Hauger, J. S. How sustainable is government-sponsored desertification rehabilitation in China? Behavior of households to changes in environmental policies. PLoS One 8, e77510 (2013).

  127. 127.

    Zhen, L. et al. Herders’ willingness to accept versus the public sector’s willingness to pay for grassland restoration in the Xilingol League of Inner Mongolia, China. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 045003 (2014).

  128. 128.

    He, B., Chen, A. F., Wang, H. L. & Wang, Q. F. Dynamic response of satellite-derived vegetation growth to climate change in the Three North Shelter Forest region in China. Remote Sens. 7, 9998–10016 (2015).

  129. 129.

    Yang, X. J. & Xu, J. T. Program sustainability and the determinants of farmers’ self-predicted post-program land use decisions: evidence from the Sloping Land Conversion Program (SLCP) in China. Environ. Dev. Econ. 19, 30–47 (2014).

  130. 130.

    Frayer, J., Sun, Z. L., Muller, D., Munroe, D. K. & Xu, J. C. Analyzing the drivers of tree planting in Yunnan, China, with Bayesian networks. Land Use Policy 36, 248–258 (2014).

  131. 131.

    Wang, Z. X. & Lu, Y. Compensation for the conversion of sloping farmland to forest in China: a feasibility study of payment based on carbon sink. J. Environ. Dev. 19, 28–41 (2010).

  132. 132.

    Wang, X., Bennett, J., Xie, C., Zhang, Z. & Liang, D. Estimating non-market environmental benefits of the Conversion of Cropland to Forest and Grassland Program: a choice modeling approach. Ecol. Econ. 63, 114–125 (2007).

  133. 133.

    Kelly, P. & Huo, X. X. Do farmers or governments make better land conservation choices? Evidence from China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program. J. For. Econ. 19, 32–60 (2013).

  134. 134.

    Lu, Y. H., Ma, Z. M., Zhang, L. W., Fu, B. J. & Gao, G. Y. Redlines for the greening of China. Environ. Sci. Policy 33, 346–353 (2013).

  135. 135.

    Ostrom, E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325, 419–422 (2009).

  136. 136.

    Zhang, W. et al. Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers. Nature 537, 671–674 (2016).

  137. 137.

    He, J. Governing forest restoration: local case studies of Sloping Land Conversion Program in southwest China. For. Policy Econ. 46, 30–38 (2014).

  138. 138.

    Yi, Y. Y., Kohlin, G. & Xu, J. T. Property rights, tenure security and forest investment incentives: evidence from China’s Collective Forest Tenure Reform. Environ. Dev. Econ. 19, 48–73 (2014).

  139. 139.

    Song, X. Z., Peng, C. H., Zhou, G. M., Jiang, H. & Wang, W. F. Chinese Grain for Green Program led to highly increased soil organic carbon levels: a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 4, 4460 (2014).

  140. 140.

    Ma, Z. et al. Rethinking China’s new great wall. Science 346, 912–914 (2014).

Download references


This work was supported by a Climate Change Engagement Grant from the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, as well as by our own institutions, in particular Deakin University. We thank M. Klaassen, D. Driscoll, J. G. Canadell and B. Huang for comments on the manuscript. This work contributes to both the Future Earth and Global Land Programme research agendas.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks R. Costanza, F. Zhang and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Yanqiong Ye, Xiufeng Sun


  1. Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia

    • Brett A. Bryan
  2. CSIRO, Waite Campus, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    • Brett A. Bryan
    • , Lei Gao
    • , Yanqiong Ye
    • , Xiufeng Sun
    • , Jeffery D. Connor
    •  & Neville D. Crossman
  3. College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

    • Yanqiong Ye
  4. College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    • Xiufeng Sun
  5. School of Commerce, City West Campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    • Jeffery D. Connor
  6. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    • Neville D. Crossman
  7. CSIRO, Black Mountain, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    • Mark Stafford-Smith
  8. Center for Human-Environment System Sustainability (CHESS), State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    • Jianguo Wu
    • , Chunyang He
    • , Deyong Yu
    • , Zhifeng Liu
    •  & Qingxu Huang
  9. School of Life Sciences and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

    • Jianguo Wu
  10. State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    • Ang Li
  11. Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China

    • Hai Ren
  12. Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    • Xiangzheng Deng
  13. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    • Hua Zheng
  14. School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China

    • Jianming Niu
  15. College of Ecology and Environmental Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China

    • Guodong Han
  16. National Forage Improvement Center, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Grassland Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot, China

    • Xiangyang Hou


  1. Search for Brett A. Bryan in:

  2. Search for Lei Gao in:

  3. Search for Yanqiong Ye in:

  4. Search for Xiufeng Sun in:

  5. Search for Jeffery D. Connor in:

  6. Search for Neville D. Crossman in:

  7. Search for Mark Stafford-Smith in:

  8. Search for Jianguo Wu in:

  9. Search for Chunyang He in:

  10. Search for Deyong Yu in:

  11. Search for Zhifeng Liu in:

  12. Search for Ang Li in:

  13. Search for Qingxu Huang in:

  14. Search for Hai Ren in:

  15. Search for Xiangzheng Deng in:

  16. Search for Hua Zheng in:

  17. Search for Jianming Niu in:

  18. Search for Guodong Han in:

  19. Search for Xiangyang Hou in:


B.A.B. designed the study and wrote the paper. L.G., Y.Y., and X.S. contributed to the writing, assembled the data and photographs, prepared the graphs, and assembled the Supplementary Information. All authors made substantive intellectual contributions to the paper and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brett A. Bryan.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    This file includes Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Tables 1 – 21 and Supplementary Figure 1. The Supplementary Tables document the details of each of the 16 major sustainability programmes reviewed (Tables 1–16), data sources for programme review (Table 17) and the rationale for mapping programme investment to SDGs (Table 18), as well as investment (Table 19) and area (Table 20) data and graphs including a breakdown by province, and area data and graphs including a breakdown by on-ground action (Table 21). Also included are additional references not cited in the main text.

  2. Supplementary Data 1

    This file contains investment data and graphs including a breakdown by Province.

  3. Supplementary Data 2

    This file contains area data and graphs including a breakdown by Province.

  4. Supplementary Data 3

    This file contains area data and graphs including a breakdown by on-ground action.

About this article

Publication history







By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.