Letter | Published:

A global slowdown of tropical-cyclone translation speed

Naturevolume 558pages104107 (2018) | Download Citation


As the Earth’s atmosphere warms, the atmospheric circulation changes. These changes vary by region and time of year, but there is evidence that anthropogenic warming causes a general weakening of summertime tropical circulation1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. Because tropical cyclones are carried along within their ambient environmental wind, there is a plausible a priori expectation that the translation speed of tropical cyclones has slowed with warming. In addition to circulation changes, anthropogenic warming causes increases in atmospheric water-vapour capacity, which are generally expected to increase precipitation rates9. Rain rates near the centres of tropical cyclones are also expected to increase with increasing global temperatures10,11,12. The amount of tropical-cyclone-related rainfall that any given local area will experience is proportional to the rain rates and inversely proportional to the translation speeds of tropical cyclones. Here I show that tropical-cyclone translation speed has decreased globally by 10 per cent over the period 1949–2016, which is very likely to have compounded, and possibly dominated, any increases in local rainfall totals that may have occurred as a result of increased tropical-cyclone rain rates. The magnitude of the slowdown varies substantially by region and by latitude, but is generally consistent with expected changes in atmospheric circulation forced by anthropogenic emissions. Of particular importance is the slowdown of 30 per cent and 20 per cent over land areas affected by western North Pacific and North Atlantic tropical cyclones, respectively, and the slowdown of 19 per cent over land areas in the Australian region. The unprecedented rainfall totals associated with the ‘stall’ of Hurricane Harvey13,14,15 over Texas in 2017 provide a notable example of the relationship between regional rainfall amounts and tropical-cyclone translation speed. Any systematic past or future change in the translation speed of tropical cyclones, particularly over land, is therefore highly relevant when considering potential changes in local rainfall totals.

  • Subscribe to Nature for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Mann, M. E. et al. Influence of anthropogenic climate change on planetary wave resonance and extreme weather events. Sci. Rep. 7, 19831 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Held, I. M. & Soden, B. J. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 19, 5686–5699 (2006).

  3. 3.

    He, J. & Soden, B. J. Anthropogenic weakening of the tropical circulation: the relative roles of direct CO2 forcing and sea surface temperature change. J. Clim. 28, 8728–8742 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Coumou, D., Lehmann, J. & Beckmann, J. The weakening summer circulation in the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes. Science 348, 324–327 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Vecchi, G. A. & Soden, B. J. Global warming and the weakening of the tropical circulation. J. Clim. 20, 4316–4340 (2007).

  6. 6.

    Vecchi, G. A. et al. Weakening of tropical Pacific atmospheric circulation due to anthropogenic forcing. Nature 441, 73–76 (2006).

  7. 7.

    Grise, K. M. & Polvani, L. M. Understanding the timescales of the tropospheric circulation response to abrupt CO2 forcing in the Southern Hemisphere: seasonality and the role of the stratosphere. J. Clim. 30, 8497–8515 (2017).

  8. 8.

    He, C., Wu, B., Zou, L. & Zhou, T. Responses of the summertime Subtropical Anticyclones to global warming. J. Clim. 30, 6465–6479 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Hartmann, D. L. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 159–254 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013).

  10. 10.

    Christensen, J. H. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1217–1308 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013).

  11. 11.

    Kossin, J. P. et al. in Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment Vol. I (eds Wuebbles, D. J. et al.) 257–276 (US Global Change Research Program, Washington DC, 2017).

  12. 12.

    Walsh, K. J. E. et al. Tropical cyclones and climate change. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 7, 65–89 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Emanuel, K. A. Assessing the present and future probability of Hurricane Harvey’s rainfall. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 12681–12684 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Risser, M. D., & Wehner, M. F. Attributable human-induced changes in the likelihood and magnitude of the observed extreme precipitation during Hurricane Harvey. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 12457–12464 (2017).

  15. 15.

    van Oldenborgh, G. J. et al. Attribution of extreme rainfall from Hurricane Harvey, August 2017. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 124009 (2017); corrigendum 13, 019501 (2018).

  16. 16.

    DeMaria, M., Mainelli, M., Shay, L. K., Knaff, J. A. & Kaplan, J. Further improvement to the Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS). Weather Forecast. 20, 531–543 (2005).

  17. 17.

    Kossin, J. P. & Sitkowski, M. Predicting hurricane intensity and structure changes associated with eyewall replacement cycles. Weather Forecast. 27, 484–488 (2012).

  18. 18.

    Hegerl, G. E. et al. Challenges in quantifying changes in the global water cycle. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 1097–1115 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Allen, M. R. & Ingram, W. J. Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature 419, 224–232 (2002).

  20. 20.

    Pendergrass, A. G. & Hartmann, D. L. The atmospheric energy constraint on global-mean precipitation change. J. Clim. 27, 757–768 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Allan, R. F. & Soden, B. J. Atmospheric warming and the amplification of precipitation extremes. Science 321, 1481–1484 (2008).

  22. 22.

    Kitoh, A. & Endo, H. Changes in precipitation extremes projected by a 20-km mesh global atmospheric model. Weather Clim. Extrem. 11, 41–52 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Kharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X. & Wehner, M. Changes in the temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble. Clim. Change 119, 345–357 (2013).

  24. 24.

    Prein, A. F. et al. The future intensification of hourly precipitation extremes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 48–52 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Knutson, T. R. et al. Global projections of intense tropical cyclone activity for the late twenty-first century from dynamical downscaling of CMIP5/RCP4.5 scenarios. J. Clim. 28, 7203–7224 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Kossin, J. P., Olander, T. L. & Knapp, K. R. Trend analysis with a new global record of tropical cyclone intensity. J. Clim. 26, 9960–9976 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Lonfat, M., Marks, F. D. & Chen, S. Precipitation distribution in tropical cyclones using the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) microwave imager: a global perspective. Mon. Weath. Rev. 132, 1645–1660 (2004).

  28. 28.

    Kossin, J. P., Emanuel, K. A. & Vecchi, G. A. The poleward migration of the location of tropical cyclone maximum intensity. Nature 509, 349–352 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Kossin, J. P., Emanuel, K. A. & Camargo, S. J. Past and projected changes in western North Pacific tropical cyclone exposure. J. Clim. 29, 5725–5739 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Rappaport, E. N. Loss of life in the United States associated with recent Atlantic tropical cyclones. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81, 2065–2073 (2000).

  31. 31.

    Knapp, K. R., Kruk, M. C., Levinson, D. H., Diamond, H. J. & Neumann, C. J. The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91, 363–376 (2010).

  32. 32.

    Schreck, C. J. III, Knapp, K. R. & Kossin, J. P. The impact of best track discrepancies on global tropical cyclone climatologies using IBTrACS. Mon. Weath. Rev. 142, 3881–3899 (2014).

  33. 33.

    Sampson, C. R. & Schrader, A. J. The automated tropical cyclone forecasting system (version 3.2)”. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81, 1231–1240 (2000).

  34. 34.

    Smith, R. B. A hurricane beta-drift law. J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 3213–3215 (1993).

  35. 35.

    Elsner, J. B., Kossin, J. P. & Jagger, T. H. The increasing intensity of the strongest tropical cyclones. Nature 455, 92–95 (2008).

  36. 36.

    Wong, B. Points of view: Color blindness. Nat. Methods 8, 441 (2011).

Download references


This work was supported by NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks M. Mann and C. Patricola for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information


  1. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Center for Weather and Climate, Madison, WI, USA

    • James P. Kossin


  1. Search for James P. Kossin in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James P. Kossin.

Extended data figures and tables

  1. Extended Data Fig. 1 Time series of annual-mean tropical-cyclone translation speed and their linear trends in varying ocean basins.

    Time series are shown for the individual ocean basins: North Atlantic, western North Pacific, northern Indian, eastern North Pacific, and the regions west and east of 100° E in the Southern Hemisphere.

  2. Extended Data Fig. 2 Time series of annual-mean tropical-cyclone translation speed and their linear trends in varying latitude belts.

    a, b, Time series are shown for global latitude belts southward (poleward) of 30° S and northward (poleward) of 35° N (a), and in the belts 30°–0° S, 0°–15° N, 15°–25° N and 25–35° N (b). The broader latitude belts defined in the less-active Southern Hemisphere were needed to have a large enough sample of tropical cyclones in each to perform the analyses. The analyses shown here are fairly robust to the choice of latitude-belt bounds.

  3. Extended Data Fig. 3 Best-track tropical-cyclone centre locations for tropical-cyclone translation speeds over land.

    Locations (black dots) are shown for the regions considered in Fig. 3 and Extended Data Table 1. ag, Over-land positions are shown for land areas affected by tropical cyclones globally (a), in the North Atlantic (b), western North Pacific (c), eastern North Pacific (d) and northern Indian (e) basins, and in the regions west (f) and east (g) of 100° E in the Southern Hemisphere.

  4. Extended Data Fig. 4 Distribution of the residuals from the ordinary least-squares regression.

    The histogram shows the distribution of residuals from the trend for the time series of annual-mean global tropical-cyclone translation speed shown in Fig. 1a. The normal distribution is shown in red.

  5. Extended Data Fig. 5 Quantile–quantile plot for the residuals of the global ordinary least-squares regression.

    The left tail of the distribution is thinner than the normal distribution, which suggests that the likelihood of an extremely slow translation speed is less than would be found in a normally distributed sample.

  6. Extended Data Table 1 Trends in tropical-cyclone translation speed and their statistics
  7. Extended Data Table 2 Trends in tropical-cyclone translation speed and their statistics under the L1 norm

About this article

Publication history






Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.