Perspective | Published:

Dissecting spinal cord regeneration

Naturevolume 557pages343350 (2018) | Download Citation



The inability to recover functions lost after severe spinal cord injury has been recognized for millennia and was first attributed to a failure of spinal cord neural regeneration over 100 years ago. The last forty years have seen intense research into achieving such regeneration, but in spite of conceptual advances and many reports announcing successful interventions, progress has been slow and often controversial. Here, I examine consequential advances and setbacks, and critically consider assumptions underlying certain approaches. I argue that expanding mechanistic knowledge about multiple forms of neural regeneration, why they fail and how they can restore function will resolve conceptual contentions and push the field forward.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Wilkins, R. H. Neurosurgical Classic—XVII. J. Neurosurg. 21, 240–244 (1964).

  2. 2.

    Ramón y Cajal, S., DeFelipe, J. & Jones, E. G. Cajal’s Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991).

  3. 3.

    Tuszynski, M. H. & Steward, O. Concepts and methods for the study of axonal regeneration in the CNS. Neuron 74, 777–791 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Schwab, M. E. & Strittmatter, S. M. Nogo limits neural plasticity and recovery from injury. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 27, 53–60 (2014).

  5. 5.

    Geoffroy, C. G. & Zheng, B. Myelin-associated inhibitors in axonal growth after CNS injury. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 27, 31–38 (2014).

  6. 6.

    O’Shea, T. M., Burda, J. E. & Sofroniew, M. V. Cell biology of spinal cord injury and repair. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 3259–3270 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Burda, J. E. & Sofroniew, M. V. Reactive gliosis and the multicellular response to CNS damage and disease. Neuron 81, 229–248 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Norenberg, M. D., Smith, J. & Marcillo, A. The pathology of human spinal cord injury: defining the problems. J. Neurotrauma 21, 429–440 (2004).

  9. 9.

    Sofroniew, M. V. Astrocyte barriers to neurotoxic inflammation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 249–263 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Cregg, J. M. et al. Functional regeneration beyond the glial scar. Exp. Neurol. 253, 197–207 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Haenzi, B. & Moon, L. D. The function of FGFR1 signalling in the spinal cord: therapeutic approaches using FGFR1 ligands after spinal cord injury. Neural Plast. 2017, 2740768 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Weiss, P. In vitro experiments on the factors determining the course of the outgrowing nerve fiber. J. Exp. Zool. 68, 393–448 (1934).

  13. 13.

    Sperry, R. W. Chemoaffinity in the orderly growth of nerve fiber patterns and connections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 50, 703–710 (1963).

  14. 14.

    Sugar, O. & Gerard, R. W. Spinal cord regeneration in the rat. J. Neurophysiol. 3, 1–19 (1940).

  15. 15.

    Brown, J. O. & McCouch, G. P. Abortive regeneration of the transected spinal cord. J. Comp. Neurol. 87, 131–137 (1947).

  16. 16.

    Clemente, C. D. & Windle, W. F. Regeneration of severed nerve fibers in the spinal cord of the adult cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 101, 691–731 (1954).

  17. 17.

    Arteta, J. L. Research on the regeneration of the spinal cord in the cat submitted to the action of pyrogenous substances (5 or 3895) of bacterial origin. J. Comp. Neurol. 105, 171–184 (1956).

  18. 18.

    Matthews, M. A., St Onge, M. F., Faciane, C. L. & Gelderd, J. B. Spinal cord transection: a quantitative analysis of elements of the connective tissue matrix formed within the site of lesion following administration of piromen, cytoxan or trypsin. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 5, 161–180 (1979).

  19. 19.

    Reier, P. J. & Houle, J. D. The glial scar: its bearing on axonal elongation and transplantation approaches to CNS repair. Adv. Neurol. 47, 87–138 (1988).

  20. 20.

    Richardson, P. M., McGuinness, U. M. & Aguayo, A. J. Axons from CNS neurons regenerate into PNS grafts. Nature 284, 264–265 (1980).

  21. 21.

    David, S. & Aguayo, A. J. Axonal elongation into peripheral nervous system “bridges” after central nervous system injury in adult rats. Science 214, 931–933 (1981).

  22. 22.

    Dodd, J. & Jessell, T. M. Axon guidance and the patterning of neuronal projections in vertebrates. Science 242, 692–699 (1988).

  23. 23.

    Tessier-Lavigne, M. & Goodman, C. S. The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 274, 1123–1133 (1996).

  24. 24.

    Schwab, M. E. & Thoenen, H. Dissociated neurons regenerate into sciatic but not optic nerve explants in culture irrespective of neurotrophic factors. J. Neurosci. 5, 2415–2423 (1985).

  25. 25.

    Schwab, M. E. Nogo and axon regeneration. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 118–124 (2004).

  26. 26.

    Bregman, B. S. et al. Recovery from spinal cord injury mediated by antibodies to neurite growth inhibitors. Nature 378, 498–501 (1995).

  27. 27.

    Huang, D. W., McKerracher, L., Braun, P. E. & David, S. A therapeutic vaccine approach to stimulate axon regeneration in the adult mammalian spinal cord. Neuron 24, 639–647 (1999).

  28. 28.

    Zheng, B. et al. Lack of enhanced spinal regeneration in Nogo-deficient mice. Neuron 38, 213–224 (2003).

  29. 29.

    Lee, J. K. et al. Assessing spinal axon regeneration and sprouting in Nogo-, MAG-, and OMgp-deficient mice. Neuron 66, 663–670 (2010).This study demonstrates that white matter molecules are not a primary cause for the failure of axon regrowth in vivo.

  30. 30.

    Zheng, B. et al. Genetic deletion of the Nogo receptor does not reduce neurite inhibition in vitro or promote corticospinal tract regeneration in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1205–1210 (2005).

  31. 31.

    Steward, O., Zheng, B., Banos, K. & Yee, K. M. Response to: Kim et al., “Axon regeneration in young adult mice lacking Nogo-A/B." Neuron 38, 187–199. Neuron 54, 191–195 (2007).

  32. 32.

    Davies, S. J. et al. Regeneration of adult axons in white matter tracts of the central nervous system. Nature 390, 680–683 (1997).

  33. 33.

    Sun, F. et al. Sustained axon regeneration induced by co-deletion of PTEN and SOCS3. Nature 480, 372–375 (2011).Ground-breaking study that shows that genetic reactivation of neuron intrinsic growth can stimulate long-distance axon growth through adult neural tissue.

  34. 34.

    Benowitz, L. I., He, Z. & Goldberg, J. L. Reaching the brain: advances in optic nerve regeneration. Exp. Neurol. 287, 365–373 (2017).

  35. 35.

    Silver, J. & Miller, J. H. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 146–156 (2004).

  36. 36.

    Anderson, M. A. et al. Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration. Nature 532, 195–200 (2016).Genetic loss-of-function study that challenges the notion that scar-forming astrocytes are a primary cause for the failure of axon regrowth in vivo.

  37. 37.

    Wang, D. & Fawcett, J. The perineuronal net and the control of CNS plasticity. Cell Tissue Res. 349, 147–160 (2012).

  38. 38.

    Mironova, Y. A. & Giger, R. J. Where no synapses go: gatekeepers of circuit remodeling and synaptic strength. Trends Neurosci. 36, 363–373 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Dyck, S. M. & Karimi-Abdolrezaee, S. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans: key modulators in the developing and pathologic central nervous system. Exp. Neurol. 269, 169–187 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Fawcett, J. W. The extracellular matrix in plasticity and regeneration after CNS injury and neurodegenerative disease. Prog. Brain Res. 218, 213–226 (2015).

  41. 41.

    Bradbury, E. J. et al. Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature 416, 636–640 (2002).

  42. 42.

    Hossain-Ibrahim, M. K., Rezajooi, K., Stallcup, W. B., Lieberman, A. R. & Anderson, P. N. Analysis of axonal regeneration in the central and peripheral nervous systems of the NG2-deficient mouse. BMC Neurosci. 8, 80 (2007).

  43. 43.

    García-Alías, G., Barkhuysen, S., Buckle, M. & Fawcett, J. W. Chondroitinase ABC treatment opens a window of opportunity for task-specific rehabilitation. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1145–1151 (2009).This study demonstrates that neutralizing CSPGs after SCI act by degrading PNN and augmenting synaptic remodelling without altering long-distance axon regrowth.

  44. 44.

    Wang, D., Ichiyama, R. M., Zhao, R., Andrews, M. R. & Fawcett, J. W. Chondroitinase combined with rehabilitation promotes recovery of forelimb function in rats with chronic spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 31, 9332–9344 (2011).

  45. 45.

    Alilain, W. J., Horn, K. P., Hu, H., Dick, T. E. & Silver, J. Functional regeneration of respiratory pathways after spinal cord injury. Nature 475, 196–200 (2011).

  46. 46.

    Tom, V. J., Steinmetz, M. P., Miller, J. H., Doller, C. M. & Silver, J. Studies on the development and behavior of the dystrophic growth cone, the hallmark of regeneration failure, in an in vitro model of the glial scar and after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 24, 6531–6539 (2004).

  47. 47.

    Lang, B. T. et al. Modulation of the proteoglycan receptor PTPσ promotes recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature 518, 404–408 (2015).

  48. 48.

    Andrews, E. M., Richards, R. J., Yin, F. Q., Viapiano, M. S. & Jakeman, L. B. Alterations in chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan expression occur both at and far from the site of spinal contusion injury. Exp. Neurol. 235, 174–187 (2012).

  49. 49.

    Lu, P., Jones, L. L. & Tuszynski, M. H. Axon regeneration through scars and into sites of chronic spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol. 203, 8–21 (2007).

  50. 50.

    Jones, L. L., Sajed, D. & Tuszynski, M. H. Axonal regeneration through regions of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan deposition after spinal cord injury: a balance of permissiveness and inhibition. J. Neurosci. 23, 9276–9288 (2003).

  51. 51.

    Khakh, B. S. & Sofroniew, M. V. Diversity of astrocyte functions and phenotypes in neural circuits. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 942–952 (2015).

  52. 52.

    Kawaja, M. D. & Gage, F. H. Reactive astrocytes are substrates for the growth of adult CNS axons in the presence of elevated levels of nerve growth factor. Neuron 7, 1019–1030 (1991).

  53. 53.

    Lee, J. K. et al. Combined genetic attenuation of myelin and semaphorin-mediated growth inhibition is insufficient to promote serotonergic axon regeneration. J. Neurosci. 30, 10899–10904 (2010).

  54. 54.

    Zukor, K. et al. Short hairpin RNA against PTEN enhances regenerative growth of corticospinal tract axons after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 33, 15350–15361 (2013).

  55. 55.

    Frisén, J. et al. Spinal axons in central nervous system scar tissue are closely related to laminin-immunoreactive astrocytes. Neuroscience 65, 293–304 (1995).

  56. 56.

    Wanner, I. B. et al. Glial scar borders are formed by newly proliferated, elongated astrocytes that interact to corral inflammatory and fibrotic cells via STAT3-dependent mechanisms after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 33, 12870–12886 (2013).

  57. 57.

    Mason, C. A., Edmondson, J. C. & Hatten, M. E. The extending astroglial process: development of glial cell shape, the growing tip, and interactions with neurons. J. Neurosci. 8, 3124–3134 (1988).

  58. 58.

    Raper, J. & Mason, C. Cellular strategies of axonal pathfinding. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a001933 (2010).

  59. 59.

    Davies, J. E. et al. Astrocytes derived from glial-restricted precursors promote spinal cord repair. J. Biol. 5, 7 (2006).

  60. 60.

    Shih, C. H., Lacagnina, M., Leuer-Bisciotti, K. & Pröschel, C. Astroglial-derived periostin promotes axonal regeneration after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 34, 2438–2443 (2014).

  61. 61.

    Zhang, S. et al. Thermoresponsive copolypeptide hydrogel vehicles for central nervous system cell delivery. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 1, 705–717 (2015).

  62. 62.

    Mokalled, M. H. et al. Injury-induced ctgfa directs glial bridging and spinal cord regeneration in zebrafish. Science 354, 630–634 (2016).

  63. 63.

    Letourneau, P. C. Cell-to-substratum adhesion and guidance of axonal elongation. Dev. Biol. 44, 92–101 (1975).

  64. 64.

    Campenot, R. B. Local control of neurite development by nerve growth factor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74, 4516–4519 (1977).

  65. 65.

    Smith, G. V. & Stevenson, J. A. Peripheral nerve grafts lacking viable Schwann cells fail to support central nervous system axonal regeneration. Exp. Brain Res. 69, 299–306 (1988).

  66. 66.

    Hagg, T. et al. Nerve growth factor promotes CNS cholinergic axonal regeneration into acellular peripheral nerve grafts. Exp. Neurol. 112, 79–88 (1991).

  67. 67.

    Alto, L. T. et al. Chemotropic guidance facilitates axonal regeneration and synapse formation after spinal cord injury. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1106–1113 (2009).This study demonstrates that developmental chemoattractive growth factors also attract axon regrowth after SCI.

  68. 68.

    Deng, L. X. et al. A novel growth-promoting pathway formed by GDNF-overexpressing Schwann cells promotes propriospinal axonal regeneration, synapse formation, and partial recovery of function after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. 33, 5655–5667 (2013).

  69. 69.

    Goldberg, J. L., Klassen, M. P., Hua, Y. & Barres, B. A. Amacrine-signaled loss of intrinsic axon growth ability by retinal ganglion cells. Science 296, 1860–1864 (2002).

  70. 70.

    He, Z. & Jin, Y. Intrinsic control of axon regeneration. Neuron 90, 437–451 (2016).

  71. 71.

    Richardson, P. M. & Issa, V. M. Peripheral injury enhances central regeneration of primary sensory neurones. Nature 309, 791–793 (1984).This study demonstrates that reactivating intrinsic neuronal growth programs synergistically augments regrowth of injured CNS into a supportive and attractive environment.

  72. 72.

    Bei, F. et al. Restoration of visual function by enhancing conduction in regenerated axons. Cell 164, 219–232 (2016).

  73. 73.

    Liu, Y. et al. A sensitized igf1 treatment restores corticospinal axon-dependent functions. Neuron 95, 817–833 (2017).

  74. 74.

    Liu, K. et al. PTEN deletion enhances the regenerative ability of adult corticospinal neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1075–1081 (2010).

  75. 75.

    Pizzorusso, T. et al. Reactivation of ocular dominance plasticity in the adult visual cortex. Science 298, 1248–1251 (2002).

  76. 76.

    Hollis, E. R. II et al. Ryk controls remapping of motor cortex during functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 697–705 (2016).

  77. 77.

    Raisman, G. Neuronal plasticity in the septal nuclei of the adult rat. Brain Res. 14, 25–48 (1969).

  78. 78.

    Weidner, N., Ner, A., Salimi, N. & Tuszynski, M. H. Spontaneous corticospinal axonal plasticity and functional recovery after adult central nervous system injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3513–3518 (2001).

  79. 79.

    Bareyre, F. M. et al. The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 269–277 (2004).This study shows that injured supraspinal axons form new connections with propriospinal neurons after SCI.

  80. 80.

    Rosenzweig, E. S. et al. Extensive spontaneous plasticity of corticospinal projections after primate spinal cord injury. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1505–1510 (2010).

  81. 81.

    Little, J. W. & Halar, E. Temporal course of motor recovery after Brown–Sequard spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia 23, 39–46 (1985).

  82. 82.

    Courtine, G. et al. Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury. Nat. Med. 14, 69–74 (2008).This study shows that new relay circuits formed by propriospinal neurons are required and sufficient to relay functional information after SCI that transects all supraspinal connections to below the injury.

  83. 83.

    Takeoka, A., Vollenweider, I., Courtine, G. & Arber, S. Muscle spindle feedback directs locomotor recovery and circuit reorganization after spinal cord injury. Cell 159, 1626–1639 (2014).

  84. 84.

    Nishimura, Y. et al. Time-dependent central compensatory mechanisms of finger dexterity after spinal cord injury. Science 318, 1150–1155 (2007).

  85. 85.

    Harkema, S. et al. Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet 377, 1938–1947 (2011).This study demonstrates that after functionally complete, but anatomically incomplete SCI, spared connections can persist that cannot on their own mediate voluntary function, but that can do so after electrophysiological stimulation combined with appropriate rehabilitation training.

  86. 86.

    van den Brand, R. et al. Restoring voluntary control of locomotion after paralyzing spinal cord injury. Science 336, 1182–1185 (2012).

  87. 87.

    Angeli, C. A., Edgerton, V. R., Gerasimenko, Y. P. & Harkema, S. J. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain 137, 1394–1409 (2014).

  88. 88.

    Alstermark, B. & Isa, T. Circuits for skilled reaching and grasping. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 559–578 (2012).

  89. 89.

    Lu, P. et al. Long-distance growth and connectivity of neural stem cells after severe spinal cord injury. Cell 150, 1264–1273 (2012).

  90. 90.

    Lu, P. et al. Prolonged human neural stem cell maturation supports recovery in injured rodent CNS. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 3287–3299 (2017).

  91. 91.

    Assinck, P., Duncan, G. J., Hilton, B. J., Plemel, J. R. & Tetzlaff, W. Cell transplantation therapy for spinal cord injury. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 637–647 (2017).

  92. 92.

    Courtine, G. et al. Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1333–1342 (2009).

  93. 93.

    Capogrosso, M. et al. A brain–spine interface alleviating gait deficits after spinal cord injury in primates. Nature 539, 284–288 (2016).

  94. 94.

    Crair, M. C., Gillespie, D. C. & Stryker, M. P. The role of visual experience in the development of columns in cat visual cortex. Science 279, 566–570 (1998).

  95. 95.

    Inglis, F. M., Zuckerman, K. E. & Kalb, R. G. Experience-dependent development of spinal motor neurons. Neuron 26, 299–305 (2000).

  96. 96.

    Martin, J. H., Choy, M., Pullman, S. & Meng, Z. Corticospinal system development depends on motor experience. J. Neurosci. 24, 2122–2132 (2004).

  97. 97.

    Jin, D. et al. Restoration of skilled locomotion by sprouting corticospinal axons induced by co-deletion of PTEN and SOCS3. Nat. Commun. 6, 8074 (2015).

  98. 98.

    Hilton, B. J. et al. Re-establishment of cortical motor output maps and spontaneous functional recovery via spared dorsolaterally projecting corticospinal neurons after dorsal column spinal cord injury in adult mice. J. Neurosci. 36, 4080–4092 (2016).

  99. 99.

    Montgomery, K. L., Iyer, S. M., Christensen, A. J., Deisseroth, K. & Delp, S. L. Beyond the brain: optogenetic control in the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 337rv5 (2016).

Download references


Work in the laboratory of M.V.S. is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NS084030), the Dr Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Foundation, the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, Paralyzed Veterans of America, and Wings for Life.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks R. Giger, B. Zheng and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information


  1. Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    • Michael V. Sofroniew


  1. Search for Michael V. Sofroniew in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael V. Sofroniew.

About this article

Publication history




Issue Date


Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.