Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an important cell-surface imaging biomarker and therapeutic target in prostate cancer. The PSMA-targeted theranostic 177Lu-PSMA-617 was approved in 2022 for men with PSMA-PET-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, not all patients respond to PSMA-radioligand therapy, in part owing to the heterogeneity of PSMA expression in the tumour. The PSMA regulatory network is composed of a PSMA transcription complex, an upstream enhancer that loops to the FOLH1 (PSMA) gene promoter, intergenic enhancers and differentially methylated regions. Our understanding of the PSMA regulatory network and the mechanisms underlying PSMA suppression is evolving. Clinically, molecular imaging provides a unique window into PSMA dynamics that occur on therapy and with disease progression, although challenges arise owing to the limited resolution of PET. PSMA regulation and heterogeneity — including intertumoural and inter-patient heterogeneity, temporal changes, lineage dynamics and the tumour microenvironment — affect PSMA theranostics. PSMA response and resistance to radioligand therapy are mediated by a number of potential mechanisms, and complementary biomarkers beyond PSMA are under development. Understanding the biological determinants of cell surface target regulation and heterogeneity can inform precision medicine approaches to PSMA theranostics as well as other emerging therapies.
Key points
-
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an in-demand targetable transmembrane folate hydrolase enzyme used for PET imaging and targeted therapy using α- and β-emitters.
-
PSMA expression is often suppressed in androgen receptor-negative advanced prostate cancers and in liver metastases, presenting a challenge for patient management and a need for alternative theranostic targets for these patients.
-
The PSMA regulatory network comprises a PSMA transcription complex, an upstream enhancer that loops to the FOLH1 (PSMA) promoter, intergenic enhancers and differentially methylated regions.
-
Regardless of PSMA expression levels in tumour tissue, a definition of PSMA positivity using PET is a prerequisite for the use of PSMA-radioligand therapy. Adjunctive companion imaging methods, such as fluorodeoxyglucose-PET or other tracers, might improve patient selection for PSMA-targeted therapies.
-
Our understanding of PSMA heterogeneity is expanding across cellular, tumoural and spatial, inter-patient, intra-patient, intra-lineage, inter-lineage and temporal dimensions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, C. D. et al. Molecular determinants of resistance to antiandrogen therapy. Nat. Med. 10, 33–39 (2004).
Polkinghorn, W. R. et al. Androgen receptor signaling regulates DNA repair in prostate cancers. Cancer Discov. 3, 1245–1253 (2013).
Chang, K.-H. et al. Dihydrotestosterone synthesis bypasses testosterone to drive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13728–13733 (2011).
Grasso, C. S. et al. The mutational landscape of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature 487, 239–243 (2012).
Scher, H. I. et al. Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 1187–1197 (2012).
Chang, K.-H. et al. A gain-of-function mutation in DHT synthesis in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cell 154, 1074–1084 (2013).
Hussain, M. et al. Enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 2465–2474 (2018).
Davis, I. D. et al. Enzalutamide with standard first-line therapy in metastatic prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 121–131 (2019).
Beltran, H. et al. Divergent clonal evolution of castration-resistant neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Nat. Med. 22, 298–305 (2016).
Beltran, H. et al. Molecular characterization of neuroendocrine prostate cancer and identification of new drug targets. Cancer Discov. 1, 487–495 (2011).
Aggarwal, R. et al. Clinical and genomic characterization of treatment-emergent small-cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer: a multi-institutional prospective study. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 2492–2503 (2018).
Dardenne, E. et al. N-Myc induces an EZH2-mediated transcriptional program driving neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 30, 563–577 (2016).
Bluemn, E. G. et al. Androgen receptor pathway-independent prostate cancer is sustained through FGF signaling. Cancer Cell 32, 474–489.e476 (2017).
Yamada, Y. & Beltran, H. Clinical and biological features of neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 23, 15 (2021).
Hofman, M. S. et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet 395, 1208–1216 (2020).
Hofman, M. S. et al. [177Lu]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 19, 825–833 (2018).
Hofman, M. S. et al. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet 397, 797–804 (2021).
Sartor, O. et al. Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 1091–1103 (2021).
Buteau, J. P. et al. PSMA and FDG-PET as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in patients given [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a biomarker analysis from a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 23, 1389–1397 (2022).
Chow, K. M. et al. Head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and conventional imaging modalities for initial staging of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. 84, 36–48 (2023).
Pienta, K. J. et al. A phase 2/3 prospective multicenter study of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate specific membrane antigen PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL in prostate cancer patients (OSPREY). J. Urol. 206, 52–61 (2021).
Perera, M. et al. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. 77, 403–417 (2020).
Maurer, T., Eiber, M., Schwaiger, M. & Gschwend, J. E. Current use of PSMA–PET in prostate cancer management. Nat. Rev. Urol. 13, 226–235 (2016).
Sartor, O. et al. LBA13 phase III trial of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in taxane-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PSMAfore). Ann. Oncol. 34, S1324–S1325 (2023).
Bakht, M. K. et al. Neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer leads to PSMA suppression. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 26, 131–146 (2019).
Bakht, M. K. et al. Differential expression of glucose transporters and hexokinases in prostate cancer with a neuroendocrine gene signature: a mechanistic perspective for 18F-FDG imaging of PSMA-suppressed tumors. J. Nucl. Med. 61, 904–910 (2020).
Bakht, M. K. et al. Landscape of prostate-specific membrane antigen heterogeneity and regulation in AR-positive and AR-negative metastatic prostate cancer. Nat. Cancer 4, 699–715 (2023).
Sayar, E. et al. Reversible epigenetic alterations mediate PSMA expression heterogeneity in advanced metastatic prostate cancer. JCI Insight 8, e162907 (2023).
Robinson, D. et al. Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell 161, 1215–1228 (2015).
Pritchard, C. C. et al. Inherited DNA-repair gene mutations in men with metastatic prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 443–453 (2016).
Silver, D. A., Pellicer, I., Fair, W. R., Heston, W. D. & Cordon-Cardo, C. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin. Cancer Res. 3, 81–85 (1997).
Wright, G. L., Haley, C., Beckett, M. L. & Schellhammer, P. F. Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in normal, benign, and malignant prostate tissues. Urol. Oncol. 1, 18–28 (1995).
Rahn, K. A., Slusher, B. S. & Kaplin, A. I. Glutamate in CNS neurodegeneration and cognition and its regulation by GCPII inhibition. Curr. Med. Chem. 19, 1335–1345 (2012).
Rahn, K. A. et al. Inhibition of glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII) activity as a treatment for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20101–20106 (2012).
Davis, M. I., Bennett, M. J., Thomas, L. M. & Bjorkman, P. J. Crystal structure of prostate-specific membrane antigen, a tumor marker and peptidase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5981–5986 (2005).
Schülke, N. et al. The homodimer of prostate-specific membrane antigen is a functional target for cancer therapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12590–12595 (2003).
Rawlings, N. D. & Barrett, A. J. Structure of membrane glutamate carboxypeptidase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1339, 247–252 (1997).
Bernstein, L. H., Gutstein, S., Weiner, S. & Efron, G. The absorption and malabsorption of folic acid and its polyglutamates. Am. J. Med. 48, 570–579 (1970).
Zhao, R., Diop-Bove, N., Visentin, M. & Goldman, I. D. Mechanisms of membrane transport of folates into cells and across epithelia. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 31, 177–201 (2011).
Figueiredo, J. C. et al. Folic acid and risk of prostate cancer: results from a randomized clinical trial. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 101, 432–435 (2009).
Sanderson, S. M., Gao, X., Dai, Z. & Locasale, J. W. Methionine metabolism in health and cancer: a nexus of diet and precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19, 625–637 (2019).
Yao, V. & Bacich, D. J. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression gives prostate cancer cells a growth advantage in a physiologically relevant folate environment in vitro. Prostate 66, 867–875 (2006).
Reina-Campos, M. et al. Increased serine and one-carbon pathway metabolism by PKCλ/ι deficiency promotes neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 35, 385–400.e389 (2019).
Kaittanis, C. et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen cleavage of vitamin B9 stimulates oncogenic signaling through metabotropic glutamate receptors. J. Exp. Med. 215, 159–175 (2018).
Palamiuc, L. & Emerling, B. M. PSMA brings new flavors to PI3K signaling: a role for glutamate in prostate cancer. J. Exp. Med. 215, 17–19 (2018).
Bakht, M. K. et al. Identification of alternative protein targets of glutamate-ureido-lysine associated with PSMA tracer uptake in prostate cancer cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2025710119 (2022).
Uhlén, M. et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419 (2015).
Barron, D. A. & Rowley, D. R. The reactive stroma microenvironment and prostate cancer progression. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 19, R187–R204 (2012).
Karthaus, W. R. et al. Regenerative potential of prostate luminal cells revealed by single-cell analysis. Science 368, 497–505 (2020).
Chang, S. S. et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen is produced in tumor-associated neovasculature. Clin. Cancer Res. 5, 2674–2681 (1999).
Conway, R. E. et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-mediated laminin proteolysis generates a pro-angiogenic peptide. Angiogenesis 19, 487–500 (2016).
Pandit-Taskar, N. et al. Indium 111-labeled J591 anti-PSMA antibody for vascular targeted imaging in progressive solid tumors. EJNMMI Res. 5, 13 (2015).
Tagawa, S. T. et al. Phase 1/2 study of fractionated dose lutetium-177-labeled anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen monoclonal antibody J591 (177Lu-J591) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer 125, 2561–2569 (2019).
Ruggiero, A. et al. Targeting the internal epitope of prostate-specific membrane antigen with 89Zr-7E11 immuno-PET. J. Nucl. Med. 52, 1608–1615 (2011).
Eder, M. et al. 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. Bioconjug. Chem. 23, 688–697 (2012).
Ganguly, T. et al. A high-affinity [18F]-labeled phosphoramidate peptidomimetic PSMA-targeted inhibitor for PET imaging of prostate cancer. Nucl. Med. Biol. 42, 780–787 (2015).
Rowe, S. P. et al. Prospective evaluation of PSMA-targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in men with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 61, 58–61 (2020).
Kuten, J. et al. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in staging prostate cancer using histopathology and immunohistochemical analysis as reference-standard. J. Nucl. Med. 61, 527–532 (2020).
Cardinale, J. et al. Procedures for the GMP-compliant production and quality control of [18F]PSMA-1007: a next generation radiofluorinated tracer for the detection of prostate cancer. Pharmaceuticals 10, 77 (2017).
Youn, S. et al. Carborane-containing urea-based inhibitors of glutamate carboxypeptidase II: synthesis and structural characterization. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25, 5232–5236 (2015).
Pavlicek, J., Ptacek, J. & Barinka, C. Glutamate carboxypeptidase II: an overview of structural studies and their importance for structure-based drug design and deciphering the reaction mechanism of the enzyme. Curr. Med. Chem. 19, 1300–1309 (2012).
Machulkin, A. E. et al. Small-molecule PSMA ligands. Current state, SAR and perspectives. J. Drug. Target. 24, 679–693 (2016).
Barinka, C. et al. Interactions between human glutamate carboxypeptidase II and urea-based inhibitors: structural characterization. J. Med. Chem. 51, 7737–7743 (2008).
Wu, L. Y. et al. The molecular pruning of a phosphoramidate peptidomimetic inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 15, 7434–7443 (2007).
Novakova, Z. et al. Unprecedented binding mode of hydroxamate-based inhibitors of glutamate carboxypeptidase II: structural characterization and biological activity. J. Med. Chem. 59, 4539–4550 (2016).
Lucaroni, L. et al. Cross-reactivity to glutamate carboxypeptidase III causes undesired salivary gland and kidney uptake of PSMA-targeted small-molecule radionuclide therapeutics. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 50, 957–961 (2023).
Bidkar, A. P. et al. Treatment of prostate cancer with CD46-targeted 225Ac alpha particle radioimmunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 29, 1916–1928 (2023).
Lee, Z., Heston, W. D., Wang, X. & Basilion, J. P. GCP III is not the “off-target” for urea-based PSMA ligands. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 50, 2944–2946 (2023).
Heynickx, N., Segers, C., Coolkens, A., Baatout, S. & Vermeulen, K. Characterization of non-specific uptake and retention mechanisms of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in the salivary glands. Pharmaceuticals 16, 692 (2023).
Heynickx, N., Herrmann, K., Vermeulen, K., Baatout, S. & Aerts, A. The salivary glands as a dose limiting organ of PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy: a review of the lessons learnt so far. Nucl. Med. Biol. 98, 30–39 (2021).
Emmett, L. et al. The PRIMARY score: using intraprostatic 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT patterns to optimize prostate cancer diagnosis. J. Nucl. Med. 63, 1644–1650 (2022).
Wolff, A. C. et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 3997–4013 (2013).
Paschalis, A. et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen heterogeneity and DNA repair defects in prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 76, 469–478 (2019).
Kuo, P. H., Benson, T., Messmann, R. & Groaning, M. Why we did what we did: PSMA PET/CT selection criteria for the VISION trial. J. Nucl. Med. 63, 816–818 (2022).
Seifert, R. et al. Second version of the prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation framework including response evaluation for clinical trials (PROMISE V2). Eur. Urol. 83, 405–412 (2023).
Eiber, M. et al. Prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE): proposed miTNM classification for the interpretation of PSMA-ligand PET/CT. J. Nucl. Med. 59, 469–478 (2018).
Saha, G. B. Physics and Radiobiology of Nuclear Medicine (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).
Calais, J. et al. Safety of PSMA-targeted molecular radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-617: results from the prospective multicenter phase 2 trial RESIST-PC (NCT03042312). J. Nucl. Med. 62, 1447–1456 (2021).
Arnfield, E. G. et al. Clinical insignificance of [18F]PSMA-1007 avid non-specific bone lesions: a retrospective evaluation. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 48, 4495–4507 (2021).
Chen, M. Y. et al. Solitary rib lesions showing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake in pre-treatment staging 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography scans for men with prostate cancer: benign or malignant? BJU Int. 126, 396–401 (2020).
Le Wen, C. et al. Factors predicting metastatic disease in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-positive osseous lesions in prostate cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 61, 1779 (2020).
Tim, E. P. et al. Predicting outcomes of indeterminate bone lesions on 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT scans in the setting of high-risk primary or recurrent prostate cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 64, 395 (2023).
Guner, L. A. et al. Enhancing PSMA PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer: investigating the impact of multiple time point evaluation, diuretic administration, cribriform pattern, and intraductal carcinoma. Ann. Nucl. Med. 37, 618–628 (2023).
Current, K. et al. Investigating PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy efficacy as a function of cellular PSMA levels and intratumoral PSMA heterogeneity. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 2946–2955 (2020).
Gafita, A. et al. Nomograms to predict outcomes after 177Lu-PSMA therapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an international, multicentre, retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 22, 1115–1125 (2021).
Thang, S. P. et al. Poor outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with low prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression deemed ineligible for 177Lu-labelled PSMA radioligand therapy. Eur. Urol. Oncol. 2, 670–676 (2019).
Violet, J. et al. Long-term follow-up and outcomes of retreatment in an expanded 50-patient single-center phase II prospective trial of 177Lu-PSMA-617 theranostics in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 61, 857–865 (2020).
Alizadeh, A. A. et al. Toward understanding and exploiting tumor heterogeneity. Nat. Med. 21, 846–853 (2015).
Bedard, P. L., Hansen, A. R., Ratain, M. J. & Siu, L. L. Tumour heterogeneity in the clinic. Nature 501, 355–364 (2013).
Henry, G. H. et al. A cellular anatomy of the normal adult human prostate and prostatic urethra. Cell Rep. 25, 3530–3542.e5 (2018).
Stylianou, N. et al. A molecular portrait of epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in prostate cancer associated with clinical outcome. Oncogene 38, 913–934 (2019).
Lin, D. et al. High fidelity patient-derived xenografts for accelerating prostate cancer discovery and drug development. Cancer Res. 74, 1272–1283 (2014).
Staniszewska, M. et al. Enzalutamide enhances PSMA expression of PSMA-low prostate cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 7431 (2021).
Bakht, M. K. et al. Influence of androgen deprivation therapy on the uptake of PSMA-targeted agents: emerging opportunities and challenges. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 51, 202–211 (2017).
Meller, B. et al. Alterations in androgen deprivation enhanced prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in prostate cancer cells as a target for diagnostics and therapy. EJNMMI Res. 5, 66 (2015).
Evans, M. J. et al. Noninvasive measurement of androgen receptor signaling with a positron-emitting radiopharmaceutical that targets prostate-specific membrane antigen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9578–9582 (2011).
Kashyap, A. et al. Quantification of tumor heterogeneity: from data acquisition to metric generation. Trends Biotechnol. 40, 647–676 (2022).
Assadi, M. et al. Predictive and prognostic potential of pretreatment 68Ga-PSMA PET tumor heterogeneity index in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with 177Lu-PSMA. Front. Oncol. 12, 1066926 (2022).
Lückerath, K. et al. Detection threshold and reproducibility of 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT in a mouse model of prostate cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 59, 1392–1397 (2018).
Nguyen, H. M. et al. LuCaP prostate cancer patient-derived xenografts reflect the molecular heterogeneity of advanced disease and serve as models for evaluating cancer therapeutics. Prostate 77, 654–671 (2017).
Nyquist, M. D. et al. Combined TP53 and RB1 loss promotes prostate cancer resistance to a spectrum of therapeutics and confers vulnerability to replication stress. Cell Rep. 31, 107669 (2020).
Lee, J. K. et al. Systemic surfaceome profiling identifies target antigens for immune-based therapy in subtypes of advanced prostate cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4473–E4482 (2018).
Olivier, P. et al. Phase III study of 18F-PSMA-1007 versus 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT for localization of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a prospective, randomized, crossover multicenter study. J. Nucl. Med. 64, 579–585 (2023).
Morgan, R., Wermuth, D., Molina, E. & Perraillon, M. Utilization and cost of radium-223 dichloride (Xofigo®) for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPR) in the U.S. Medicare population. J. Nucl. Med. 62, 1309–1309 (2021).
Hoving, H. et al. Early 18F-FDHT PET/CT as a predictor of treatment response in mCRPC treated with enzalutamide. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 232–232 (2019).
Puca, L. et al. Delta-like protein 3 expression and therapeutic targeting in neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaav0891 (2019).
O’Donoghue, J. A. et al. Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of a [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A anti-STEAP1 antibody in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Mol. Pharm. 16, 3083–3090 (2019).
Bhatia, V. et al. Targeting advanced prostate cancer with STEAP1 chimeric antigen receptor T cell and tumor-localized IL-12 immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 14, 2041 (2023).
Kesch, C. et al. High fibroblast-activation-protein expression in castration-resistant prostate cancer supports the use of FAPI-molecular theranostics. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 49, 385–389 (2021).
O’Keefe, D. S. et al. Mapping, genomic organization and promoter analysis of the human prostate-specific membrane antigen gene. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1443, 113–127 (1998).
Afshar-Oromieh, A. et al. Impact of long-term androgen deprivation therapy on PSMA ligand PET/CT in patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 45, 2045–2054 (2018).
Unterrainer, L. et al. Early changes of PSMA PET signal after initiation of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors in mCRPC: an international multicenter retrospective study. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, 5063–5063 (2023).
Tagawa, S. T. et al. PSMAddition: a phase 3 trial to compare treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care (SoC) and SoC alone in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, TPS5116–TPS5116 (2023).
Emmett, L. et al. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ENZA-p): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 25, 563–571 (2024).
Baca, S. C. et al. Reprogramming of the FOXA1 cistrome in treatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Nat. Commun. 12, 1979 (2021).
McMullin, R. P. et al. A FOXA1-binding enhancer regulates Hoxb13 expression in the prostate gland. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 98–103 (2010).
Watt, F. et al. A tissue-specific enhancer of the prostate-specific membrane antigen gene, FOLH1. Genomics 73, 243–254 (2001).
Giambartolomei, C. et al. H3K27ac HiChIP in prostate cell lines identifies risk genes for prostate cancer susceptibility. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 108, 2284–2300 (2021).
Seifert, R. et al. Analysis of PSMA expression and outcome in patients with advanced prostate cancer receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. Theranostics 10, 7812–7820 (2020).
Hindié, E. Predicting outcomes after 177Lu-PSMA therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 22, e425 (2021).
Wang, Z. et al. Extracellular vesicles in fatty liver promote a metastatic tumor microenvironment. Cell Metab. 35, 1209–1226.e1213 (2023).
Xue, R. et al. Liver tumour immune microenvironment subtypes and neutrophil heterogeneity. Nature 612, 141–147 (2022).
Schulte, M. L. et al. Pharmacological blockade of ASCT2-dependent glutamine transport leads to antitumor efficacy in preclinical models. Nat. Med. 24, 194–202 (2018).
Wang, Q. et al. Targeting amino acid transport in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: effects on cell cycle, cell growth, and tumor development. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 105, 1463–1473 (2013).
Chen, F., Han, Y. & Kang, Y. Bone marrow niches in the regulation of bone metastasis. Br. J. Cancer 124, 1912–1920 (2021).
Uwe, H., Frederik, G., Alfred, M. & Clemens, K. The future of radioligand therapy: α, β, or both? J. Nucl. Med. 58, 1017 (2017).
Kostos, L. et al. AlphaBet: combination of radium-223 and [17 7Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (clinical trial protocol). Front. Med. 9, 1059122 (2022).
Rajasekaran, S. A. et al. A novel cytoplasmic tail MXXXL motif mediates the internalization of prostate-specific membrane antigen. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 4835–4845 (2003).
Ghosh, A. & Heston, W. D. Tumor target prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and its regulation in prostate cancer. J. Cell Biochem. 91, 528–539 (2004).
Liu, H. et al. Constitutive and antibody-induced internalization of prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res. 58, 4055–4060 (1998).
Anilkumar, G. et al. Association of prostate-specific membrane antigen with caveolin-1 and its caveolae-dependent internalization in microvascular endothelial cells: implications for targeting to tumor vasculature. Microvasc. Res. 72, 54–61 (2006).
Goodman et al. Interaction of prostate specific membrane antigen with clathrin and the adaptor protein complex-2. Int. J. Oncol. 31, 1199–1203 (2007).
Schmidt, S. et al. Discriminatory role of detergent-resistant membranes in the dimerization and endocytosis of prostate-specific membrane antigen. PLoS ONE 8, e66193 (2013).
Anilkumar, G. et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen association with filamin A modulates its internalization and NAALADase activity. Cancer Res. 63, 2645–2648 (2003).
Christiansen, J. J. et al. N-glycosylation and microtubule integrity are involved in apical targeting of prostate-specific membrane antigen: implications for immunotherapy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 4, 704–714 (2005).
Oudard, S. et al. Cabazitaxel versus docetaxel as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomized phase III trial — FIRSTANA. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 3189–3197 (2017).
Kondev, F. G. Nuclear data sheets for A=177. Nucl. Data Sheets 159, 1–412 (2019).
Jain, A. K., Raut, R. & Tuli, J. K. Nuclear data sheets for A = 225. Nucl. Data Sheets 110, 1409–1472 (2009).
Kratochwil, C. et al. Targeted α-therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with 225Ac-PSMA-617: dosimetry estimate and empiric dose finding. J. Nucl. Med. 58, 1624–1631 (2017).
Enger, S. A., Hartman, T., Carlsson, J. & Lundqvist, H. Cross-fire doses from β-emitting radionuclides in targeted radiotherapy. A theoretical study based on experimentally measured tumor characteristics. Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 1909 (2008).
McDevitt, M. R., Sgouros, G. & Sofou, S. Targeted and nontargeted α-particle therapies. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 20, 73–93 (2018).
He, Y. et al. Targeting signaling pathways in prostate cancer: mechanisms and clinical trials. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 7, 198 (2022).
Enger, S. A., Hartman, T., Carlsson, J. & Lundqvist, H. Cross-fire doses from β-emitting radionuclides in targeted radiotherapy. A theoretical study based on experimentally measured tumor characteristics. Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 1909–1920 (2008).
Azzam, E. I., De Toledo, S. M., Spitz, D. R. & Little, J. B. Oxidative metabolism modulates signal transduction and micronucleus formation in bystander cells from α-particle-irradiated normal human fibroblast cultures. Cancer Res. 62, 5436–5442 (2002).
Marie, B. et al. Radiation-induced biologic bystander effect elicited in vitro by targeted radiopharmaceuticals labeled with α-, β-, and auger electron-emitting radionuclides. J. Nucl. Med. 47, 1007 (2006).
Bodei, L. et al. The joint IAEA, EANM, and SNMMI practical guidance on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRNT) in neuroendocrine tumours. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 40, 800–816 (2013).
Sheehan, B. et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression and response to DNA damaging agents in prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 28, 3104–3115 (2022).
Salas-Ramirez, M. et al. Radiation-induced double-strand breaks by internal ex vivo irradiation of lymphocytes: validation of a Monte Carlo simulation model using GATE and Geant4-DNA. Z. Med. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.07.007 (2023).
Khreish, F. et al. 225Ac-PSMA-617/177Lu-PSMA-617 tandem therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: pilot experience. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 47, 721–728 (2020).
Müller, C. et al. Terbium-161 for PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy of prostate cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 46, 1919–1930 (2019).
Vlachostergios, P. J. et al. Imaging expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen and response to PSMA-targeted β-emitting radionuclide therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate 81, 279–285 (2021).
Derlin, T. et al. PSMA-heterogeneity in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: circulating tumor cells, metastatic tumor burden, and response to targeted radioligand therapy. Prostate 83, 1076–1088 (2023).
Vanwelkenhuyzen, J. et al. AR and PI3K genomic profiling of cell-free DNA can identify poor responders to lutetium-177-PSMA among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. Open. Sci. 53, 63–66 (2023).
Wang, C.-B. et al. Urine-derived exosomal PSMA is a promising diagnostic biomarker for the detection of prostate cancer on initial biopsy. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 25, 758–767 (2023).
Harmon, S. A. et al. A prospective comparison of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT and PSMA-targeted 18F-DCFBC PET/CT in metastatic prostate cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 59, 1665–1671 (2018).
Regula, N. et al. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with 11C-acetate PET/CT in re-staging of prostate cancer relapse. Sci. Rep. 10, 4993 (2020).
Shiiba, M. et al. Evaluation of primary prostate cancer using 11C-methionine-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Ann. Nucl. Med. 26, 138–145 (2012).
Zoppolo, F. et al. 11C-SAM: radiosynthesis and preliminary biological studies as a potential agent for prostate cancer diagnosis. J. Nucl. Med. 57, 2700–2700 (2016).
Mori, H. et al. Imaging somatostatin receptor activity in neuroendocrine-differentiated prostate cancer. Intern. Med. 57, 3123–3128 (2018).
Korsen, J. A. et al. Delta-like ligand 3 — targeted radioimmunotherapy for neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2203820119 (2022).
Kratochwil, C. et al. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: tracer uptake in 28 different kinds of cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 60, 801–805 (2019).
Bakht, M. M. K. Molecular imaging targets in prostate cancers with neuroendocrine gene signature. Thesis, Univ. Windsor (Canada) https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/8170 (2019).
Uhlen et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260419 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This work supported by the Prostate Cancer Foundation, Department of Defense (W81XWH-17-1-0653 to H.B., W81XWH-22-1-0010 to M.K.B.), and NIH/NCI (R37CA241486 and P50CA272390 to H.B.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
H.B. has served as consultant/advisory board member for Janssen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Amgen, Bayer, Daicchi Sankyo, Sanofi and Novartis, and has received research funding (to institution) from Janssen, AbbVie/Stemcentrx, Bristol Myers Squibb, Circle Pharma, Novartis and Daicchi Sankyo. M.K.B. declares no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Urology thanks Jeremie Calais, David Quigley, Michael Hofman, Tobias Maurer, Martin Sjöström and Fabian Falkenbach for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bakht, M.K., Beltran, H. Biological determinants of PSMA expression, regulation and heterogeneity in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-024-00900-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-024-00900-z