Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

MALE FACTOR INFERTILITY

How to select ICSI-viable sperm from the most challenging samples

Sperm characteristics are routinely assessed in fertility clinics as decisive factors to select sperm for improved intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes. A recent study suggests that, in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, no specific defect or combination of abnormalities in testicular sperm precluded chance of pregnancy, while also suggesting sperm motility and acrosome defects are the proxies relevant to ICSI outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Machine learning algorithm-based testicular sperm selection.

References

  1. Corona, G. et al. Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 25, 733–757 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal, A. et al. Male infertility. Lancet 397, 319–333 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vasilescu, S. A. et al. A microfluidic approach to rapid sperm recovery from heterogeneous cell suspensions. Sci. Rep. 11, 7917 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aboukhshaba, A. et al. Testicular sperm characteristics in men with nonobstructive azoospermia and their impact on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Fertil. Steril. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.024 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng, J. et al. Decreased sperm motility retarded ICSI fertilization rate in severe oligozoospermia but good-quality embryo transfer had achieved the prospective clinical outcomes. PLoS ONE 11, e0163524 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marzano, G. et al. Sperm selection in assisted reproduction: a review of established methods and cutting-edge possibilities. Biotechnol. Adv. 40, 107498 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dai, C. et al. Advances in sperm analysis: techniques, discoveries and applications. Nat. Rev. Urol. 18, 447–467 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. You, J. B. et al. Machine learning for sperm selection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 18, 387–403 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Esteves, S. C., Roque, M., Bradley, C. K. & Garrido, N. Reproductive outcomes of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection among men with high levels of DNA fragmentation in semen: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 108, 456–467 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Reza Nosrati or David Sinton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nosrati, R., Sinton, D. How to select ICSI-viable sperm from the most challenging samples. Nat Rev Urol 19, 135–136 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00546-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00546-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing