Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Radical prostatectomy — aftercare should not be an afterthought

Focus on quality of life after prostate cancer is vital to improve patient care. Improved assessment and proactive management of post-treatment functional outcomes is essential. Many aspects of the patients’ aftercare need to be improved in order to set up a clear path following prostatectomy. These improvements will enable a timely and efficient escalation of treatment and ameliorate patients’ survivorship experience.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Cancer Research UK. Prostate cancer. Cancer Research UK (2019).

  2. 2.

    Department of Health, Macmillan Cancer Support & NHS Improvement. Living with and beyond cancer: taking action to improve outcomes. Department of Health (2013).

  3. 3.

    Tal, R., Alphs, H. H., Krebs, P., Nelson, C. J. & Mulhall, J. P. Erectile function recovery rate after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis. J. Sex. Med. 6, 2538–2546 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kretschmer, A., Hübner, W., Sandhu, J. S. & Bauer, R. M. Evaluation and management of postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review of current literature. Eur. Urol. Focus 2, 245–259 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gontero, P. et al. Is there an optimal time for intracavernous prostaglandin E1 rehabilitation following nonnerve sparing radical prostatectomy? Results from a hemodynamic prospective study. J. Urol. 169, 2166–2169 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Venderbos, L. D. F. et al. Europa Uomo Patient Reported Outcome Study (EUPROMS): descriptive statistics of a prostate cancer survey from patients for patients. Eur. Urol. Focus (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ratcliff, C. G., Cohen, L., Pettaway, C. A. & Parker, P. A. Treatment regret and quality of life following radical prostatectomy. Support. Care Cancer 21, 3337–3343 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Martin, N. E. et al. Defining a standard set of patient-centered outcomes for men with localized prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 67, 460–467 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Protopapa, E., van der Meulen, J., Moore, C. M. & Smith, S. C. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires for men who have radical surgery for prostate cancer: a conceptual review of existing instruments. BJU Int. 120, 468–481 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dunn, J. et al. Prostate cancer survivorship essentials framework: guidelines for practitioners. BJU Int. (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information




Corresponding author

Correspondence to Findlay MacAskill.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.S., M.S. and F.M. have received an unrestricted educational grant from Boston Scientific.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacAskill, F., Sahai, A., Shabbir, M. et al. Radical prostatectomy — aftercare should not be an afterthought. Nat Rev Urol 18, 703–704 (2021).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing