Focus on quality of life after prostate cancer is vital to improve patient care. Improved assessment and proactive management of post-treatment functional outcomes is essential. Many aspects of the patients’ aftercare need to be improved in order to set up a clear path following prostatectomy. These improvements will enable a timely and efficient escalation of treatment and ameliorate patients’ survivorship experience.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Cancer Research UK. Prostate cancer. Cancer Research UK https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/prostate-cancer (2019).
Department of Health, Macmillan Cancer Support & NHS Improvement. Living with and beyond cancer: taking action to improve outcomes. Department of Health https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/181054/9333-TSO-2900664-NCSI_Report_FINAL.pdf (2013).
Tal, R., Alphs, H. H., Krebs, P., Nelson, C. J. & Mulhall, J. P. Erectile function recovery rate after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis. J. Sex. Med. 6, 2538–2546 (2009).
Kretschmer, A., Hübner, W., Sandhu, J. S. & Bauer, R. M. Evaluation and management of postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review of current literature. Eur. Urol. Focus 2, 245–259 (2016).
Gontero, P. et al. Is there an optimal time for intracavernous prostaglandin E1 rehabilitation following nonnerve sparing radical prostatectomy? Results from a hemodynamic prospective study. J. Urol. 169, 2166–2169 (2003).
Venderbos, L. D. F. et al. Europa Uomo Patient Reported Outcome Study (EUPROMS): descriptive statistics of a prostate cancer survey from patients for patients. Eur. Urol. Focus https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.11.002 (2020).
Ratcliff, C. G., Cohen, L., Pettaway, C. A. & Parker, P. A. Treatment regret and quality of life following radical prostatectomy. Support. Care Cancer 21, 3337–3343 (2013).
Martin, N. E. et al. Defining a standard set of patient-centered outcomes for men with localized prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 67, 460–467 (2015).
Protopapa, E., van der Meulen, J., Moore, C. M. & Smith, S. C. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires for men who have radical surgery for prostate cancer: a conceptual review of existing instruments. BJU Int. 120, 468–481 (2017).
Dunn, J. et al. Prostate cancer survivorship essentials framework: guidelines for practitioners. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15159 (2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.S., M.S. and F.M. have received an unrestricted educational grant from Boston Scientific.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MacAskill, F., Sahai, A., Shabbir, M. et al. Radical prostatectomy — aftercare should not be an afterthought. Nat Rev Urol 18, 703–704 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00526-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00526-5