Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

PROSTATE CANCER

Is a targeted biopsy-only approach for prostate cancer diagnosis ready for the prime time?

The PRECISION trial demonstrated the ability of using multiparametric MRI to improve the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer whilst reducing over-diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer compared with systematic biopsy. Concerns remained about patients who were not biopsied owing to negative scans. A new study applies the PRECISION strategy to a contemporary cohort to answer these concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Villers, A. et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. J. Urol. 176, 2432–2437 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kasivisvanathan, V. et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 1767–1777 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feuer, Z. et al. Application of the PRECISION trial biopsy strategy to a contemporary MRI-targeted biopsy cohort: how many clinically significant prostate cancers are missed? J. Urol. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001406 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rouvière, O. et al. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 20, 100–109 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahdoot, M. et al. MRI-targeted, systematic, and combined biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 917–928 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meng, X. et al. The institutional learning curve of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy: temporal improvements in cancer detection in 4 years. J. Urol. 200, 1022–1029 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bryk, D. J. et al. The role of ipsilateral and contralateral transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy in men with unilateral magnetic resonance imaging lesion undergoing magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy. Urology 102, 178–182 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmed, H. U. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389, 815–822 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhinav Sidana.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sussman, J., Sidana, A. Is a targeted biopsy-only approach for prostate cancer diagnosis ready for the prime time?. Nat Rev Urol 18, 75–76 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-00412-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-00412-6

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing