Exposure to urology is essential for medical undergraduates to prepare them with the competencies required to manage basic urological conditions and to generate interest in the specialty. However, despite the existence of national curricula, the lack of urological exposure and falling competition ratios indicate a need for an evaluation of urological teaching in medical schools.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Hashim, H. et al. An Undergraduate Syllabus for Urology (The British Association of Urological Surgeons, 2012).
General Medical Council. Outcomes for graduates (2018). General Medical Council https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/standards-and-outcomes/outcomes-for-graduates (2020).
Baker, D. et al. Core content of the medical school surgical curriculum: consensus report from the association of surgeons in training (ASIT). Int. J. Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.036 (2020).
Shah, J., Billington, R., Manson, J. & Vale, J. Undergraduate urology: a survey of current provisions and guidelines for a core curriculum. BJU Int. 89, 327–330 (2002).
Gómez Rivas, J. et al. Undergraduate education for urology in Europe. Where do we stand? Eur. Urol. 78, 381–384 (2020).
Derbyshire, L. F. & O’Flynn, K. J. Medical students’ exposure to urology in the undergraduate curriculum, a web based survey. Br. J. Med. Surg. Urol. 5, 4–10 (2012).
Conroy, S. Undergraduate urology education: a fundamental pillar in building the next generation of urologists. Eur. Urol. 78, 385–386 (2020).
Forsythe, R. O. & Eylert, M. F. Medical students and foundation doctors need more exposure to basic urology. Bull. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 96, 240–243 (2014).
Ng, A. et al. Study launch: urological teaching in British medical schools nationally (LEARN). BJU Int. 126, 311–312 (2020).
Kasivisvanathan, V. et al. The British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Research Collaborative: an alternative research model for carrying out large scale multi-centre urological studies. BJU Int. 121, 6–9 (2018).
British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) acknowledges financial support from The British Association of Urological Surgeons, the British Journal of Urology International Trustees, the Rosetrees Trust, The Urology Foundation, Action Bladder Cancer UK, Dominvs Group, UKCRC Registered Clinical Trials Units Network, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, The Institute of Cancer Research, the National Institute for Health Research, the North Wales and North West Urological Research Centre, Prostate Cancer UK, the University of Sheffield, University College London and the University of Birmingham. None of these organizations had a role in the decision to carry out this work, content of this work or decision to publish. V.K. is an academic clinical lecturer funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, NIHR or the Department of Health. The authors thank W. Cambridge, K. Jayaraajan, C. Lam, M. Matthews, K. Clement, M. Kulkarni and S. Khadhouri, who are part of the LEARN study team.
The authors declare no competing interests.
BURST Research Collaborative: https://www.bursturology.com/
About this article
Cite this article
Ng, A., Light, A., Chan, V.WS. et al. Urology teaching in UK medical schools: does it prepare doctors adequately?. Nat Rev Urol 17, 651–652 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-00393-6