Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Mitigating white Western individualistic bias and creating more inclusive neuroscience

Neuroscience is not meeting its full potential. We suggest that an important contributor to this problem is a legacy of unchecked white Western individualist bias. We offer a relational rubric of principles with illustrative cases that scientists can use to enhance scientific imagination and rigour while fostering inclusive scientific communities to mitigate bias.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. Portelli, J. P. & Campbell-Stephens, R. Leading for Equity: The Investing in Diversity Approach (Edphil Books, 2009).

  2. Etienne, A. et al. Novel electrodes for reliable EEG recordings on coarse and curly hair. In Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. EMBS 2020-July, 6151–6154 (2020).

  3. Weinberger, D. R., Dzirasa, K. & Crumpton-Young, L. L. Missing in action: African ancestry brain research. Neuron 107, 407–411 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 18, 459–480 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamamura, T. Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism–collectivism in the United States and Japan. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 16, 3–24 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mhlambi, S. From Rationality to Relationality: Ubuntu as an Ethical & Human Rights Framework for Artificial Intelligence Governance. Carr Center Discussion Paper Series, 2020-009 (Carr Centre for Human Rights Policy, 2020).

  7. Kasulis, T. P. Intimacy or Integrity: Philosophy and Cultural Difference (Univ. Hawaii Press, 2002).

  8. Shelley-Egan, C., Hanssen, A. B., Landeweerd, L. & Hofmann, B. Responsible research and innovation in the context of human cognitive enhancement: some essential features. J. Responsib. Innov. 5, 65–85 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Valantine, H. A. NIH’s scientific approach to inclusive excellence. FASEB J. 34, 13085–13090 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong, L. & Page, S. E. Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16385–16389 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank T. Brown, G. Hue, J. Sarrett, Z. Li and A. Moss for valuable discussions that informed thinking on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Linzie Taylor or Karen S. Rommelfanger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Related links

African Ancestry Neuroscience Research Initiative:

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taylor, L., Rommelfanger, K.S. Mitigating white Western individualistic bias and creating more inclusive neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 23, 389–390 (2022).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing