Abstract
Cognition can be defined as computation over meaningful representations in the brain to produce adaptive behaviour. There are two views on the relationship between cognition and the brain that are largely implicit in the literature. The Sherringtonian view seeks to explain cognition as the result of operations on signals performed at nodes in a network and passed between them that are implemented by specific neurons and their connections in circuits in the brain. The contrasting Hopfieldian view explains cognition as the result of transformations between or movement within representational spaces that are implemented by neural populations. Thus, the Hopfieldian view relegates details regarding the identity of and connections between specific neurons to the status of secondary explainers. Only the Hopfieldian approach has the representational and computational resources needed to develop novel neurofunctional objects that can serve as primary explainers of cognition.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
17 June 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00487-z
References
Gallistel, C. R. & King, A. P. Memory and the Computational Brain: Why Cognitive Science Will Transform Neuroscience Vol. 3 (Wiley, 2009).
Goodman, N. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols (Hackett Publishing, 1976).
Fodor, J. A. Propositional attitudes. Monist 61, 501–523 (1978).
Fodor, J. A. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind (MIT Press, 1987).
Fodor, J. A. A Theory of Content and Other Essays (MIT Press, 1990).
Cummins, R. Meaning and Mental Representation (MIT Press, 1989).
Cummins, R., Putnam, H. & Block, N. Representations, Targets, and Attitudes (MIT Press, 1996).
Millikan, R. G. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism (MIT Press, 1984).
Ramsey, W. M. Representation Reconsidered (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Shea, N. Representation in Cognitive Science (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).
Yamins, D. L. & DiCarlo, J. J. Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 356 (2016).
Rajalingham, R. & DiCarlo, J. J. Reversible inactivation of different millimeter-scale regions of primate IT results in different patterns of core object recognition deficits. Neuron 102, 493–505 (2019).
DiCarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D. & Rust, N. C. How does the brain solve visual object recognition? Neuron 73, 415–434 (2012).
Tsao, D. Y., Freiwald, W. A., Knutsen, T. A., Mandeville, J. B. & Tootell, R. B. H. Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 989–995 (2003).
Bao, P., She, L., McGill, M. & Tsao, D. Y. A map of object space in primate inferotemporal cortex. Nature 583, 103–108 (2020).
Kriegeskorte, N. & Diedrichsen, J. Peeling the onion of brain representations. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 42, 407–432 (2019).
Yuste, R. From the neuron doctrine to neural networks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 487–497 (2015).
Eichenbaum, H. Barlow versus Hebb: when is it time to abandon the notion of feature detectors and adopt the cell assembly as the unit of cognition? Neurosci. Lett. 680, 88–93 (2018).
Sherrington, C. S. Observations on the scratch‐reflex in the spinal dog. J. Physiol. 34, 1–50 (1906).
Barlow, H. B. Summation and inhibition in the frog’s retina. J. Physiol. 119, 69–88 (1953).
Parker, D. Complexities and uncertainties of neuronal network function. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 361, 81–99 (2006).
Tye, K. M. & Uchida, N. Editorial overview: Neurobiology of behavior. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 49, iv–ix (2020).
Marder, E., Goeritz, M. L. & Otopalik, A. G. Robust circuit rhythms in small circuits arise from variable circuit components and mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 31, 156–163 (2015).
Creutzfeldt, O. D. Generality of the functional structure of the neocortex. Naturwissenschaften 64, 507–517 (1977).
Douglas, R. J., Martin, K. A. & Whitteridge, D. A canonical microcircuit for neocortex. Neural Comput. 1, 480–488 (1989).
Harris, K. D. & Shepherd, G. M. The neocortical circuit: themes and variations. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 170–181 (2015).
Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T. & Movshon, J. A. Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals. Vis. Neurosci. 10, 1157–1169 (1993).
Salzman, C. D. & Newsome, W. T. Neural mechanisms for forming a perceptual decision. Science 264, 231–237 (1994).
Roitman, J. D. & Shadlen, M. N. Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. J. Neurosci. 22, 9475–9489 (2002).
Gold, J. I. & Shadlen, M. N. Banburismus and the brain: decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron 36, 299–308 (2002).
Shadlen, M. & Newsome, W. Motion perception: seeing and deciding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 628–633 (1996).
Mazurek, M. E., Roitman, J. D., Ditterich, J. & Shadlen, M. N. A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. Cereb. Cortex 13, 1257–1269 (2003).
Ditterich, J. Stochastic models of decisions about motion direction: behavior and physiology. Neural Netw. 19, 981–1012 (2006).
Zeki, S. M. Cells responding to changing image size and disparity in the cortex of the rhesus monkey. J. Physiol. 242, 827–841 (1974).
Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T. & Movshon, J. A. Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals. Vis. Neurosci. 10, 1157–1169 (1993).
Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T. & Movshon, J. A. The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. J. Neurosci. 12, 4745–4765 (1992).
Blatt, G. J., Andersen, R. A. & Stoner, G. R. Visual receptive field organization and cortico-cortical connections of the lateral intraparietal area (area LIP) in the macaque. J. Comp. Neurol. 299, 421–445 (1990).
Latimer, K. W., Yates, J. L., Meister, M. L., Huk, A. C. & Pillow, J. W. Single-trial spike trains in parietal cortex reveal discrete steps during decision-making. Science 349, 184–187 (2015).
Katz, L. N., Yates, J. L., Pillow, J. W. & Huk, A. C. Dissociated functional significance of decision-related activity in the primate dorsal stream. Nature 535, 285–288 (2016).
Fusi, S., Miller, E. K. & Rigotti, M. Why neurons mix: high dimensionality for higher cognition. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 37, 66–74 (2016).
Rosenblatt, F. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol. Rev. 65, 386 (1958).
Minsky, M. & Papert, S. A. Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry (MIT Press, 1969).
Rigotti, M., Rubin, D. B., Wang, X. J. & Fusi, S. Internal representation of task rules by recurrent dynamics: the importance of the diversity of neural responses. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 4, 24 (2010).
Zador, A. M., Claiborne, B. J. & Brown, T. H. Nonlinear pattern separation in single hippocampal neurons with active dendritic membrane, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 51–58 (NIPS, 1991).
Legenstein, R. & Maass, W. Branch-specific plasticity enables self-organization of nonlinear computation in single neurons. J. Neurosci. 31, 10787–10802 (2011).
Kimura, R. et al. Hippocampal polysynaptic computation. J. Neurosci. 31, 13168–13179 (2011).
Bianchi, D. et al. On the mechanisms underlying the depolarization block in the spiking dynamics of CA1 pyramidal neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 33, 207–225 (2012).
Gidon, A. et al. Dendritic action potentials and computation in human layer 2/3 cortical neurons. Science 367, 83–87 (2020).
Wang, X. J. Probabilistic decision making by slow reverberation in cortical circuits. Neuron 36, 955–968 (2002).
Hebb, D. The Organization of Behavior (Wiley, 1949).
McCrea, D. A. & Rybak, I. A. Organization of mammalian locomotor rhythm and pattern generation. Brain Res. Rev. 57, 134–146 (2008).
Fries, P. A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cognit. Sci. 9, 474–480 (2005).
Krakauer, J. W., Ghazanfar, A. A., Gomez-Marin, A., MacIver, M. A. & Poeppel, D. Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron 93, 480–490 (2017).
Jazayeri, M. & Afraz, A. Navigating the neural space in search of the neural code. Neuron 93, 1003–1014 (2017).
Paninski, L. & Cunningham, J. P. Neural data science: accelerating the experiment–analysis–theory cycle in large-scale neuroscience. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 50, 232–241 (2018).
Hu, Y., Trousdale, J., Josić, K. & Shea-Brown, E. Motif statistics and spike correlations in neuronal networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2013, P03012 (2013).
Hu, Y., Trousdale, J., Josić, K. & Shea-Brown, E. Local paths to global coherence: cutting networks down to size. Phys. Rev. E 89, 032802 (2014).
Hu, Y. et al. Feedback through graph motifs relates structure and function in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 98, 062312 (2018).
Recanatesi, S., Ocker, G. K., Buice, M. A. & Shea-Brown, E. Dimensionality in recurrent spiking networks: global trends in activity and local origins in connectivity. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006446 (2019).
Hopfield, J. J. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 2554–2558 (1982).
Hopfield, J. J. Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 3088–3092 (1984).
Hopfield, J. J. & Tank, D. W. Computing with neural circuits: a model. Science 233, 625–633 (1986).
Ramón y Cajal, S. Estudios sobre la corteza cerebral humana. Corteza visual. Rev. Trim. Microgr. 4, 1–63 (1899).
McCulloch, W. S. & Pitts, W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys. 5, 115–133 (1943).
Buzsaki, G. Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers. Neuron 68, 362–385 (2010).
Saxena, S. & Cunningham, J. P. Towards the neural population doctrine. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 55, 103–111 (2019).
Mesulam, M.-M. From sensation to cognition. Brain J. Neurol. 121, 1013–1052 (1998).
Anderson, M. L. After Phrenology (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).
Sporns, O. Networks of the Brain (MIT Press, 2010).
Lashley, K. S. Mass action in cerebral function. Science 73, 245–254 (1931).
Trautmann, E. M. et al. Accurate estimation of neural population dynamics without spike sorting. Neuron 103, 292–308 (2019).
Clark, A. A Theory of Sentience (Clarendon Press, 2000).
Gärdenfors, P. Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought (MIT Press, 2004).
Meister, M. L., Hennig, J. A. & Huk, A. C. Signal multiplexing and single-neuron computations in lateral intraparietal area during decision-making. J. Neurosci. 33, 2254–2267 (2013).
Mante, V., Sussillo, D., Shenoy, K. V. & Newsome, W. T. Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex. Nature 503, 78–84 (2013).
Warden, M. R. & Miller, E. K. The representation of multiple objects in prefrontal neuronal delay activity. Cereb. Cortex 17, i41–i50 (2007).
Warden, M. R. & Miller, E. K. Task-dependent changes in short-term memory in the prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 30, 15801–15810 (2010).
Rigotti, M. et al. The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks. Nature 497, 585–590 (2013).
Moser, E. I. et al. Grid cells and cortical representation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 466 (2014).
Moser, E. I., Moser, M.-B. & McNaughton, B. L. Spatial representation in the hippocampal formation: a history. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1448 (2017).
Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Witter, M. P., Moser, E. I. & Moser, M.-B. Spatial representation in the entorhinal cortex. Science 305, 1258–1264 (2004).
Hafting, T., Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Moser, M.-B. & Moser, E. I. Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature 436, 801–806 (2005).
Sargolini, F. et al. Conjunctive representation of position, direction, and velocity in entorhinal cortex. Science 312, 758–762 (2006).
Tolman, E. C. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol. Rev. 55, 189 (1948).
Constantinescu, A. O., O’Reilly, J. X. & Behrens, T. E. Organizing conceptual knowledge in humans with a gridlike code. Science 352, 1464–1468 (2016).
Behrens, T. E. et al. What is a cognitive map? Organizing knowledge for flexible behavior. Neuron 100, 490–509 (2018).
Sorscher, B., Mel, G., Ganguli, S. & Ocko, S. A unified theory for the origin of grid cells through the lens of pattern formation, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10003–10013 (NeurIPS, 2019).
Cueva, C. J. & Wei, X.-X. Emergence of grid-like representations by training recurrent neural networks to perform spatial localization. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.07770 (2018).
Banino, A. et al. Vector-based navigation using grid-like representations in artificial agents. Nature 557, 429–433 (2018).
Felleman, D. & Van Essen, D. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1, 1–47 (1991).
Zador, A. M. A critique of pure learning and what artificial neural networks can learn from animal brains. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–7 (2019).
Polger, T. W. & Shapiro, L. A. The Multiple Realization Book (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016).
Bechtel, W. A bridge between cognitive science and neuroscience: the functional architecture of mind. Philos. Stud. 44, 319–330 (1983).
Pylyshyn, Z. W. Computation and Cognition (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984).
Ramon y Cajal, S. Estructura de los centros nerviosos de las aves [Spanish] (1888).
Sherrington, C. The Integrative Action of the Central Nervous System (Archibald Constable, 1906).
Barlow, H. Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? Perception 1, 371–394 (1972).
Martin, K. A. A brief history of the “feature detector”. Cereb. Cortex 4, 1–7 (1994).
Shepherd, G. M. Foundations of the Neuron Doctrine (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).
Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1962).
Haberkern, H. & Jayaraman, V. Studying small brains to understand the building blocks of cognition. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 37, 59–65 (2016).
Cobb, M. The Idea of the Brain: The Past and Future of Neuroscience (Basic Books, 2020).
Barack, D. L. Mental machines. Biol. Philos. 34, 63 (2019).
Fuster, J. The Prefrontal Cortex (Academic Press, 2008).
Arbib, M. A., Plangprasopchok, A., Bonaiuto, J. & Schuler, R. E. A neuroinformatics of brain modeling and its implementation in the Brain Operation Database BODB. Neuroinformatics 12, 5–26 (2014).
Carandini, M. & Heeger, D. J. Normalization as a canonical neural computation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 51–62 (2012).
Wong, K.-F. & Wang, X.-J. A recurrent network mechanism of time integration in perceptual decisions. J. Neurosci. 26, 1314–1328 (2006).
Song, H. F., Yang, G. R. & Wang, X.-J. Reward-based training of recurrent neural networks for cognitive and value-based tasks. eLife 6, e21492 (2017).
Song, H. F., Yang, G. R. & Wang, X.-J. Training excitatory–inhibitory recurrent neural networks for cognitive tasks: a simple and flexible framework. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004792–e1004792 (2016).
Churchland, M. M., Byron, M. Y., Ryu, S. I., Santhanam, G. & Shenoy, K. V. Neural variability in premotor cortex provides a signature of motor preparation. J. Neurosci. 26, 3697–3712 (2006).
Churchland, M. M., Cunningham, J. P., Kaufman, M. T., Ryu, S. I. & Shenoy, K. V. Cortical preparatory activity: representation of movement or first cog in a dynamical machine? Neuron 68, 387–400 (2010).
Wong, A. L., Haith, A. M. & Krakauer, J. W. Motor planning. Neuroscientist 21, 385–398 (2015).
Haith, A. M. & Bestmann, S. in The Cognitive Neurosciences VI (eds Poeppel, D., Mangun, R., & Gazzaniga, M. S.) 541–548 (MIT Press, 2020).
Shenoy, K. V., Sahani, M. & Churchland, M. M. Cortical control of arm movements: a dynamical systems perspective. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36, 337–359 (2013).
Vyas, S., Golub, M. D., Sussillo, D. & Shenoy, K. Computation through neural population dynamics. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 43, 249–275 (2020).
Yoo, S. B. M. & Hayden, B. Y. Economic choice as an untangling of options into actions. Neuron 99, 434–447 (2018).
Golub, M. D. et al. Learning by neural reassociation. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 607–616 (2018).
Wang, J., Narain, D., Hosseini, E. A. & Jazayeri, M. Flexible timing by temporal scaling of cortical responses. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 102–110 (2018).
Egger, S. W., Le, N. M. & Jazayeri, M. A neural circuit model for human sensorimotor timing. Nat. Commun. 11, 3933 (2020).
Remington, E. D., Egger, S. W., Narain, D., Wang, J. & Jazayeri, M. A dynamical systems perspective on flexible motor timing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 938–952 (2018).
Sohn, H., Narain, D., Meirhaeghe, N. & Jazayeri, M. Bayesian computation through cortical latent dynamics. Neuron 103, 934–947 (2019).
Chaisangmongkon, W., Swaminathan, S. K., Freedman, D. J. & Wang, X.-J. Computing by robust transience: how the fronto-parietal network performs sequential, category-based decisions. Neuron 93, 1504–1517 (2017).
Sarafyazd, M. & Jazayeri, M. Hierarchical reasoning by neural circuits in the frontal cortex. Science 364, eaav8911 (2019).
Feynman, R. P. Space–time approach to quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. 76, 769 (1949).
De Regt, H. W. Understanding Scientific Understanding (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017).
Bertolero, M. A. & Bassett, D. S. On the nature of explanations offered by network science: A perspective from and for practicing neuroscientists. Top. Cogn. Sci. 12, 1272–1293 (2020).
Kohn, A. et al. Principles of corticocortical communication: proposed schemes and design considerations. Trends Neurosci. 43, 725–737 (2020).
Nelson, S. B. Cortical microcircuits: diverse or canonical? Neuron 36, 19–27 (2002).
Churchland, P. M. Cognitive neurobiology: a computational hypothesis for laminar cortex. Biol. Philos. 1, 25–51 (1986).
Lisman, J. et al. The molecular basis of CaMKII function in synaptic and behavioural memory. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 175–190 (2002).
Janak, P. H. & Tye, K. M. From circuits to behaviour in the amygdala. Nature 517, 284–292 (2015).
Churchland, M. M. et al. Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: a widespread cortical phenomenon. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 369–378 (2010).
Marr, D. Vision (Henry Holt, 1982).
Sterelny, K. The Representational Theory of Mind: An Introduction (Blackwell, 1990).
Shagrir, O. Marr on computational-level theories. Philos. Sci. 77, 477–500 (2010).
Haugeland, J. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea (MIT Press, 1985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.L.B. and J.W.K. contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Neuroscience thanks T. Behrens, who co-reviewed with A. Baram; R. Krauzlis; and E. Miller for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Glossary
- Content
-
The referent of a state, what the state is about.
- Dimensionality
-
The set of basis elements whose combinations can describe any point in that space.
- Exclusive disjunction
-
Either A or B but not both A and B.
- Neural spaces
-
Conceptualizations of brain regions as N-dimensional spaces where each Nth dimension is a representation of a neuron and the value along the dimension is the firing rate of that neuron.
- Perceptrons
-
Early artificial neural network models.
- Reticularism
-
An early idea about the brain’s biological organization that maintained the brain is a continuous network not divisible into cells.
- Semantic representations
-
Representations that have semantic content and can be mapped on to the content given some context of use.
- State
-
A point or a region of neural space.
- Tonotopy
-
An orderly arrangement of the representation of auditory tones in the brain from lowest to highest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barack, D.L., Krakauer, J.W. Two views on the cognitive brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 22, 359–371 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00448-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00448-6
This article is cited by
-
The cognitive impact of light: illuminating ipRGC circuit mechanisms
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2024)
-
Downstream network transformations dissociate neural activity from causal functional contributions
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Preparatory activity and the expansive null-space
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2024)
-
Deep convolutional neural networks are not mechanistic explanations of object recognition
Synthese (2024)
-
Preserved neural dynamics across animals performing similar behaviour
Nature (2023)