Curating more diverse scientific conferences

Scientific meetings are an opportunity to promote research and researchers. However, despite best intentions, scientific conferences can fall short of reflecting the gender balance and diversity of the communities they serve. Here we discuss initiatives to enhance gender balance and diversity at Cosyne 2020.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Glynn, C. J. & Huge, M. The Matilda effect in science communication: an experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Sci. Commun. 35, 603–625 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tomkins, A., Zhang, M. & Heavlin, W. D. Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 12708–12713 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Blank, R. M. The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: experimental evidence from The American Economic Review. The American Economic Review 81, 1041–1067 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Merton, R. K. The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159, 56–63 (1968).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    BiasWatchNeuro. Computational neuroscience base rates. https://biaswatchneuro.com/base-rates/computational-neuroscience-base-rates/ (2016).

  6. 6.

    Cosyne Talks. COSYNE 2020 Session 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elF1T_UHcFs (2020).

  7. 7.

    Lerchenmueller, M. J., Sorenson, O. & Jena, A. B. Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study. BMJ 367, l6573 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Marie M. Oswald.

Additional information

Related links

Base rates; BiasWatchNeuro: https://biaswatchneuro.com/base-rates/

BiasWatchNeuro: https://biaswatchneuro.com/

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oswald, A.M., Ostojic, S. Curating more diverse scientific conferences. Nat Rev Neurosci (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0373-4

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing