Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Assessing the causal role of early visual areas in visual mental imagery

We read with great interest the review by J. Pearson on visual mental imagery (Pearson, J. The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 624–634 (2019))1. The author outlines a model of visual mental imagery based on neuroimaging findings that involves large-scale brain networks spanning prefrontal areas to sensory areas, and that highlights the activation of occipital areas during visual mental imagery. Specifically, the model indicates that it is the “sensory and spatial representations of the imagery content” that would be formed in early visual areas.

However, individuals with acquired brain damage restricted to the occipital cortex typically have perfectly vivid visual mental imagery. For example, a patient with bilateral strokes in the white matter between the occipital and the temporal cortices2 had severe visual deficits for object form and colour, faces, words and letters but demonstrated perfectly preserved visual mental imagery abilities for these same items3. In addition, people with cortical blindness due to bilateral occipital lesions can experience vivid visual mental images4,5.

By contrast, patients with damage extending anteriorly in the temporal lobe, especially in the left hemisphere, often find themselves unable to build visual mental images6,7. Where does the discrepancy between the neuroimaging and neuropsychological findings come from? The neuroimaging results supporting the hypothesis of an implication of early visual areas are correlative in nature, whereas deficits in people with brain injury demonstrate a causal contribution of the lesioned circuits to the relevant cognitive ability (it is true that transcranial magnetic interference on the primary visual cortex was shown to impact visual mental imagery8, but this effect might depend on modulation of downstream visual areas).

A recent case report9 provided more specific evidence on the neural bases of visual mental imagery. After a bilateral stroke in the territory of the posterior cerebral artery, an architect, who before the stroke could easily imagine objects and buildings, spontaneously reported to have become unable to visualize items. By comparing his lesion location with those of other individuals with strokes in the same arterial territory, the authors found that the architect had selective damage in the left fusiform gyrus, a region in the ventral temporal cortex. The left temporal location is consistent with previous reports of individuals with impaired mental imagery after stroke6,7. During perception, this fusiform region might act as a neural interface between sensory information coming from the occipital cortex and semantic processing in the anterior temporal lobe10. In visual mental imagery, it could endow semantic memories with visual information. Taken together, the results from brain-damaged persons invite a revision of the neural model of visual mental imagery proposed by Pearson1, whereby fronto-parietal networks initiate, modulate and maintain activity in a core left temporal network centred on high-level visual regions in the ventral temporal cortex, with no causal role of early visual cortex.

There is a reply to this letter by Pearson J. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. (2020).


  1. 1.

    Pearson, J. The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 624–634 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bartolomeo, P., Bachoud-Levi, A. C. & Thiebaut de Schotten, M. The anatomy of cerebral achromatopsia: a reappraisal and comparison of two case reports. Cortex 56, 138–144 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bartolomeo, P. et al. Multiple-domain dissociation between impaired visual perception and preserved mental imagery in a patient with bilateral extrastriate lesions. Neuropsychologia 36, 239–249 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chatterjee, A. & Southwood, M. H. Cortical blindness and visual imagery. Neurology 45, 2189–2195 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    de Gelder, B., Tamietto, M., Pegna, A. J. & Van den Stock, J. Visual imagery influences brain responses to visual stimulation in bilateral cortical blindness. Cortex 72, 15–26 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Moro, V., Berlucchi, G., Lerch, J., Tomaiuolo, F. & Aglioti, S. M. Selective deficit of mental visual imagery with intact primary visual cortex and visual perception. Cortex 44, 109–118 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bartolomeo, P. The neural correlates of visual mental imagery: an ongoing debate. Cortex 44, 107–108 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kosslyn, S. M. et al. The role of area 17 in visual imagery: convergent evidence from PET and rTMS. Science 284, 167–170 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Thorudottir, S. et al. The architect who lost the ability to imagine: the cerebral basis of visual imagery. Brain Sciences 10, 59 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ralph, M., Jefferies, E., Patterson, K. & Rogers, T. T. The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 42 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Bartolomeo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bartolomeo, P., Hajhajate, D., Liu, J. et al. Assessing the causal role of early visual areas in visual mental imagery. Nat Rev Neurosci 21, 517 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing