Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The importance of ongoing international surveillance for Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease


Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) is a rapidly progressive, fatal and transmissible neurodegenerative disease associated with the accumulation of misfolded prion protein in the CNS. International CJD surveillance programmes have been active since the emergence, in the mid-1990s, of variant CJD (vCJD), a disease linked to bovine spongiform encephalopathy. Control measures have now successfully contained bovine spongiform encephalopathy and the incidence of vCJD has declined, leading to questions about the requirement for ongoing surveillance. However, several lines of evidence have raised concerns that further cases of vCJD could emerge as a result of prolonged incubation and/or secondary transmission. Emerging evidence from peripheral tissue distribution studies employing high-sensitivity assays suggests that all forms of human prion disease carry a theoretical risk of iatrogenic transmission. Finally, emerging diseases, such as chronic wasting disease and camel prion disease, pose further risks to public health. In this Review, we provide an up-to-date overview of the transmission of prion diseases in human populations and argue that CJD surveillance remains vital both from a public health perspective and to support essential research into disease pathophysiology, enhanced diagnostic tests and much-needed treatments.

Key points

  • Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) is a transmissible and universally fatal human prion disease; surveillance programmes exist globally to monitor trends in CJD epidemiology and mitigate public health risks.

  • The variant CJD (vCJD) epidemic was a devastating consequence of the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) epizootic.

  • Studies indicate the widespread prevalence of vCJD-associated prion protein in BSE-exposed populations.

  • Although new diagnoses of vCJD have declined in parallel with the suppression of BSE, lessons from other prion diseases indicate the potential for highly extensive incubation phases lasting decades.

  • Emerging animal prion diseases might harbour the potential for zoonotic transmission to humans.

  • Continued CJD surveillance is a necessity to meet the potential for further cases of vCJD or the emergence of novel prion diseases in humans.


Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) is a devastating and uniformly fatal human prion disease. The disease typically causes a combination of cognitive and motor dysfunction and is associated with rapid progression, with the majority of affected individuals dying within several months of symptom onset1,2,3,4,5. Sporadic CJD (sCJD) is the archetypal human prion disease, belonging to a family of transmissible and universally lethal mammalian diseases6. The discovery that prion diseases are associated with the conversion of normal host-encoded cellular prion protein (PrPC) to a misfolded form (PrPSc) by post-translational modification, independently of nucleic acid, became known as the protein-only hypothesis. It was Stanley Prusiner who discovered and characterized prions, for which he received a Nobel Prize in 1997 (ref.7). Prion diseases are transmissible and multiple epidemics affecting humans and animals have emerged globally over the last 50 years5,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. A hallmark of prion disease transmission is the potential for incubation phases lasting several years, sometimes decades5,9,15,16.

A polymorphism at codon 129 (c129) in the prion protein gene (PRNP) strongly influences the susceptibility towards and the clinical features of human prion diseases1,9,10,17,18,19,20. Over 90% of East Asian individuals are homozygous for methionine at c129 (MM genotype); however, in populations of European descent, ~40% of individuals have the MM genotype, ~50% of individuals are heterozygous for methionine and valine (MV genotype), and ~10% are homozygous for valine (VV genotype)21. The treatment of tissue samples with proteinase K followed by western blot examination enables the detection of protease-resistant fragments of PrPSc (PrPres) in individuals with prion disease, providing a ‘molecular signature’ of the disease22. PrPres is biochemically classified according to the molecular weight of the unglycosylated fragment, which is 21 kDa in type 1 PrPres and 19 kDa in type 2 PrPres (refs22,23). Type 2 is further classified into types 2A and 2B; the latter is characterized by a predominant diglycosylated band and is present in individuals with variant CJD (vCJD)23. Prion diseases can be classified according to the system suggested by Parchi et al.17, which is based on a combination of the c129 genotype and PrPres isotype, providing biological correlates for clinical manifestations of disease24.

CJD consists of three subtypes: sporadic, inherited and acquired (comprising iatrogenic CJD (iCJD), vCJD and Kuru). All forms of CJD are transmissible and thus pose serious public health challenges. vCJD was first detected in 1996, initially in the UK25 and subsequently in France26, and was causally linked to the epizootic of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), a prion disease affecting cattle. The incidence of vCJD has dramatically declined since the global vCJD epidemic peaked in 2000; seven new cases of the disease have been identified globally since 2012 (refs10,16,20,27,28) (Fig. 1). As CJD clinical surveillance programmes were developed in response to the emergence of BSE in cattle, the question of whether CJD surveillance is still necessary has now emerged. In this Review, we discuss the evidence indicating that further cases of vCJD could arise as a result of extensive incubation, asymptomatic carriage of vCJD-associated prion protein and secondary transmission. We also discuss the potential for secondary transmission of other forms of CJD, occupational risks, emerging prion diseases with zoonotic potential and the growing evidence that other neurodegenerative diseases could harbour the potential for prion-like transmissibility. We highlight the importance of surveillance programmes for accurate case ascertainment, public health interventions and much-needed research into prion diseases. Last, we provide the outline for a model surveillance programme and suggestions for how international surveillance should progress in the twenty-first century.

Fig. 1: The global burden of vCJD.

Graph shows the annual number of deaths from variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (vCJD) in the 12 countries or territories for which data is available. Data obtained from the European Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease Surveillance Network (EuroCJD).

Clinical subtypes of prion disease

Sporadic CJD

In the majority (~85%) of individuals who develop CJD, the disease arises sporadically1,29,30,31. The onset of sCJD is most common between the ages of 60 and 70 years32, although cases have been identified across a range of age groups1. sCJD has been detected in Europe1,17,29,30,33,34, North America31, Central America35, South America36,37, Africa38,39,40, Asia41,42,43,44,45 and Australasia33,46,47, and has a global incidence of 1–2 per million, although the reported incidence varies between nations and is influenced by the methods and extent of surveillance performed2. Multiple low-income and middle-income countries have reported cases of sCJD37,38,39,40,43,48,49; however, as surveillance programmes are absent across much of the world, accurate epidemiological assessment is extremely challenging21.

The aetiology of sCJD is unknown; however, the leading hypothesis is of an endogenous origin via a somatic mutation in PRNP or, alternatively, the spontaneous misfolding of PrPC into PrPSc (ref.50). Some case–control studies have suggested the presence of exogenous risk factors. For example, two studies identified an association between sCJD and previous surgery51,52, including non-neurosurgical (particularly ophthalmologic) operations. Another study found an association between sCJD and previous blood-product transfusion53. However, such case–control studies of sCJD have methodological limitations, including the potential for various forms of bias such as recall bias, differences in risk factor reporting (in contrast to healthy controls, most individuals with sCJD are unable to provide a direct history, leading to a reliance on relatives to provide information), and heterogeneity between studies in terms of the time windows of exposure assessed52,53. A detailed comparison of 18 studies is provided in a 2012 systematic review by de Pedro Cuesta et al.54. Evidence indicates that the c129 genotype has a substantial impact on susceptibility to sCJD: ~70% of individuals with sCJD have the MM genotype17,55.

sCJD classically presents as a rapidly progressive dementia with motor decline that includes ataxia as well as pyramidal and extrapyramidal features; however, symptoms can include visual disturbance (most notably in the Heidenhain subtype56), neuropsychiatric manifestations and stroke-like presentations24. Myoclonus is common and patients eventually progress to an akinetic, mute, fully dependent state. Diagnostic classification follows the European Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease Surveillance Network criteria57 (Box 1). Diagnosis is based on the presence of typical clinical features, supported by evidence from additional investigations. This supporting evidence includes the identification of characteristic MRI changes in the basal ganglia and/or cortex58,59 (Fig. 2), EEG showing characteristic periodic sharp wave complexes60, elevated levels of 14-3-3 protein in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)61,62,63 and the detection of PrPsc in CSF using real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) (an aggregation assay with almost 100% specificity for the diagnosis of sCJD)64,65,66. The neuropathology of CJD is characterized by vacuolation and/or spongiform change, neuronal loss, gliosis, and the immunohistochemical detection of PrPSc (refs17,67,68). The median survival for individuals with sCJD is 5 months from symptom onset24. sCJD can be categorized by c129 genotype and PrPSc isotype into six subgroups (MM1, MM2, MV1, MV2, VV1 and VV2) each with characteristic clinical and neuropathological phenotypes17,58 (Figs 3,4).

Fig. 2: Brain MRI in individuals with CJD.

Bilateral basal ganglia hyperintensities (arrowheads) are seen in sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) (part a). Multifocal cortical ribboning can be seen in sporadic CJD, visible in the parietal (part b) and interhemispheric (part c) cortex in this individual. Bilateral pulvinar hyperintensities (arrows), known as the pulvinar sign, are seen in variant CJD (part d).

Fig. 3: Histological features of sCJD.

Histologically, the characteristic feature of prion diseases is spongiform change. Sporadic, genetic and acquired forms of prion disease show different patterns of spongiform change and, in individuals with sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (sCJD), PRNP codon 129 genotype and western blot typing of the abnormal prion protein (PrP) also influence the pattern of histological change. In this figure, we provide examples of the histology typically observed in the different forms sCJD. Frontal cortex section from an individual with the MM1 subtype of sCJD showing the fine cortical vacuolation (arrows) that is common in most prion disorders (H&E staining, x100 magnification) (part a). Frontal cortex section from an individual with the MM2 subtype of sCJD showing that fine vacuoles can coalesce to form coarse vacuoles (arrow), a feature particularly prominent in this subtype of sCJD (H&E staining, x100 magnification) (part b). Frontal cortex section from an individual with the MM1 subtype of sCJD showing a predominantly fine synaptic pattern of PrP antibody staining (brown) counterstained with haematoxylin to visualize cell nuclei (blue; x200 magnification) (part c). Frontal cortex section from an individual with the MM2 subtype of sCJD showing coarser PrP antibody staining (brown) that is accentuated around the coalesced vacuoles (arrows; x100 magnification) (part d). Frontal cortex section from an individual with the VV2 subtype of sCJD showing a linear pattern of PrP antibody staining in the deeper cortex (x20 magnification) (part e). A higher magnification image of the same sample shows that the staining in part e is peri-neuronal (frontal cortex section, x200 magnification) (part f). Cerebellar cortex section from an individual with the MV2 subtype of sCJD, showing kuru-like plaques (arrow; H&E staining, x400 magnification) (part g). These plaques (arrows) are easily visualized with PrP antibody staining (brown; cerebellum, x100 magnification) (part h).

Fig. 4: Western blot typing in CJD.

Samples of brain tissue from individuals with Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) can be treated with proteinase K before western blotting to detect protease-resistant fragments of misfolded prion protein (PrPres). PrPres is classified according to the molecular weight of the unglycosylated fragment, which is 21 kDa in type 1 PrPres and 19 kDa in type 2 PrPres. Type 2 is further classified into type 2A and 2B (variant CJD (vCJD)). Type 2B, present in both vCJD and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), is characterized by a predominant diglycosylated band (*). Examples are shown from individuals with sporadic CJD (sCJD) MM1, sCJD VV2, vCJD and from a case with BSE. MM, homozygous for methionine at codon 12 of the gene encoding prion protein; VV, homozygous for valine at codon 129 of the gene encoding prion protein.

Inherited prion diseases

In 10–15% of individuals with a prion disease3,4,69, the disease arises secondary to mutations in PRNP and is categorized as inherited prion disease (IPD)69. Over 50 prion disease-associated PRNP mutations have now been described24,69. Most of these mutations show autosomal dominant inheritance and high penetrance, although some individuals with IPD do not have a family history of the disease3,69. IPD is associated with a longer survival than sCJD, which means that individuals with IPD comprise a substantial proportion of the prevalent population70. This prevalence is accompanied by public health risks relating to transmission. In some individuals, IPD can be difficult to distinguish from sCJD based on clinical characteristics and therefore diagnostic PRNP genotyping is often helpful. The extent of the public health risk posed by asymptomatic PRNP mutation carriers during interventional procedures and/or blood or tissue donation is not yet clear; risk-reduction measures for these individuals are in place in many countries71,72.

Considerable heterogeneity in age of onset, duration of disease and clinical features exists between individuals with different PRNP mutations as well as between family members with the same mutation69. The clinical features of IPD can also mimic other neurodegenerative disorders69,73; symptoms can resemble Alzheimer disease74, Huntington disease75,76,77, frontotemporal dementia78,79 and spinocerebellar ataxia76. Individuals with IPD associated with the E200K mutation in PRNP often have a clinical presentation that mimics sCJD, with rapid progression from symptom onset to death in <5 months3. Individuals with mutations, such as E200K, that are associated with an sCJD phenotype are referred to as having genetic CJD (gCJD). Gerstmann–Straussler–Scheinker syndrome, which is most commonly caused by the P102L mutation in PRNP, causes a progressive ataxia with associated cognitive and sensory abnormalities76 and has characteristic neuropathological features (Fig. 5). The disease typically progresses more slowly than sCJD, with a mean survival of 49 months from symptom onset76. Fatal familial insomnia, a result of the D178N mutation in combination with methionine at c129 on the affected allele (D178N–129M), presents with characteristic sleep disorders, autonomic disease, and gait disturbance and is typically fatal within 2 years of onset80. By contrast, individuals with D178N and valine at c129 on the affected allele (D178–129V) develop gCJD81.

Fig. 5: Histological features of genetic forms of prion diseases.

Genetic forms of prion diseases show variable histological features and can resemble sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease; however, some show unique patterns of pathology. Image of a cerebellar section of an individual with the PRNP P102L-129M variant (the most common haplotype) of Gerstmann–Straussler–Scheinker disease showing multicentric plaques (arrows), which are most numerous in the molecular layer and granule cell layer (H&E staining, x200 magnification) (part a). A lower-magnification image from the same individual as in part a showing plaques (arrows) stained with prion protein antibody (brown; x40 magnification) (part b).

Surveillance systems have greatly enhanced our understanding of the international distribution of IPD-associated mutations3,41,82,83, yielding valuable insights. E200K is the most common mutation internationally3,82 but is particularly common in Slovakia, where it is present in >65% of individuals with prion disease3, and in Jewish individuals with Libyan ancestry, a population prevalent in Israel84. Evidence indicates that, in Italy, a nation with a relatively high rate of IPD3, the V210I mutation is the most frequent and is present in 41.5% of individuals with IPD85. Fatal familial insomnia has been observed in Europe, Asia, Australia and the USA3,21,80,83,86. T188K is a common cause of IPD in China, where it is present in 23% of affected individuals83, but is uncommon elsewhere, including other Asian nations such as Japan41 and Korea87 where no individuals with the mutation were identified in published IPD case series. Ongoing global surveillance continues to identify novel mutations associated with prion disease, often showing small clusters within regions; for example, the identification of a cohort of individuals with R208H in Sardinia, which suggests a founder population88. V180I and M232R are commonly encountered in Japanese individuals with IPD, comprising 41.2% and 15.3% of PRNP variants, respectively41. However, V180I and M232R might increase the susceptibility to sCJD rather than being disease-causing mutations69,89. Some authors89 have cited factors, including the sCJD-like phenotype and the absence of a relevant family history among affected individuals (present in only 2% of individuals with V180I and in 0% with M232R41), as evidence that V180I and M232R might be polymorphisms rather than pathogenic mutations. IPD has been reported in South America90 and India91; however, a lack of structured surveillance programmes in these regions means that prevalence remains unclear.

Acquired prion diseases


Fewer than 5% of individuals diagnosed with CJD7 have one of the acquired prion diseases, which consist of iCJD, vCJD and Kuru2,92. To date, Kuru has only been detected in the Fore people in Papua New Guinea, in whom an epidemic of the disease was caused by ritualistic mortuary cannibalism8,9,93,94. The Kuru epidemic is thought to have started in the 1920s and peaked in the late 1950s8,9. The epidemic subsided following the prohibition of cannibalism in the mid-1950s9,94; however, in some individuals heterozygous at c129, Kuru did not manifest until several decades after exposure9. This observation demonstrates the risk of extensive incubation times in acquired prion diseases.

Iatrogenic CJD

iCJD was first described in 1974 in an individual who had received a transplant of corneal tissue from a deceased donor, in whom sCJD was later identified at autopsy95. Subsequent cases of iCJD were traced to a number of causes. The two principal aetiologies are treatment with cadaveric pituitary-derived human growth hormone (c-hGH)96 and human dura mater (hDM) grafts5. Less commonly, iCJD has arisen secondary to treatment with cadaveric gonadotropins97 and following exposure to contaminated neurosurgical instruments and intracerebral depth electrodes24. The iatrogenic transmission of vCJD via blood products (discussed in more detail below) is typically considered separately to iCJD owing to major differences in the pathology and manifestations of the two diseases. Despite effective control measures, including a transition to recombinant hormone synthesis in the mid-1980s5,15,98, the introduction of enhanced disinfection and processing of hDM grafts in 1987 (refs99,100), shifts in neurosurgical practice away from hDM graft usage101, and the sterilization and quarantine of infected instruments71,102, individuals with iCJD are still being reported1,100. For some of these individuals, exposure to the prion protein was more than four decades before disease manifestation103, highlighting the potential for extensive incubation periods5,15,98.

The hDM-associated iCJD epidemic began in 1985 and peaked globally in 1997 (ref.5), although cases continue to be identified100. The epidemic arose largely from the use of Lyodura, a hDM product produced in Germany5,100,104. The region with the largest number of hDM-associated iCJD cases (154 as of March 2018 (ref.100)) was Japan, where high numbers of hDM-grafting procedures were performed, although cases were also reported in other Asian nations, Europe, the USA, Australasia and South Africa5.

c-hGH-associated iCJD was most frequently encountered in France29, the UK1 and the USA105, and less commonly in other European countries, New Zealand, Qatar and Brazil5. The epidemic began in 1984 and peaked globally in 1995 (ref.5); individuals with extensive incubation continue to be reported15. The majority of individuals who developed c-hGH-associated iCJD in France had the MM c129 genotype whereas, in the UK, the VV and MV genotypes were more common5,106. c-hGH-associated iCJD is believed to have originated from the preparation of c-hGH from cadaveric sources likely to have had undetected sCJD15. Therefore, the presence of different PrPSc strains in different cadaveric sources might have contributed to the differing susceptibility to c-hGH-associated iCJD among c129 genotype groups in the UK and France15.

Important lessons have been learned from the study of iCJD. The incubation period varies, being shortest following exposure to contaminated neurosurgical instruments and longest following exposure to hDM grafts and cadaveric hormones5. However, incubation rates also vary between individuals with the same means of exposure5. For example, individuals with the MV c129 genotype tend to show longer iCJD incubation periods than individuals with other c129 genotpyes5. These insights are relevant to vCJD as legitimate concerns exist that future cases of vCJD could emerge following extensive incubation periods. Long incubation periods are also relevant when considering the potential of secondary transmission of all forms of CJD. The clinical manifestations of iCJD are variable, with peripheral exposures frequently leading to cerebellar-onset presentations and central exposures leading to cognitive-onset manifestations5. Last, as a general historical point, medical and agricultural practices that unknowingly posed infection risks at the time have subsequently resulted in the emergence of prion disease, sometimes many years later. The prompt identification of individuals with iCJD through surveillance was integral to the implementation of the measures that contained the resulting epidemics, illustrating the essential role for surveillance systems in managing novel prion disease epidemics.

Variant CJD

vCJD is the rarest form of human prion disease and was first recognized between 1995 and 1996 following the identification of a series of individuals in the UK with a novel prion disease characterized by atypical demographic, clinical, radiological and pathological features25,107 (Box 2). vCJD predominantly presents in the third decade of life and has a median survival period of 14 months, which is longer than that of sCJD108. In vCJD, early psychiatric symptoms including withdrawal, anxiety and dysphoria are common before the development of cognitive impairment, ataxia and movement disorders109,110. Thalamic pain affects many individuals in the early stages of the disease109. The presence of the pulvinar sign on MRI is a highly sensitive marker of vCJD in the appropriate context111. The detection of high levels of 14-3-3 protein in the CSF, which is a biomarker with 75–90% sensitivity for sCJD, only shows a 50% sensitivity for vCJD112. Furthermore, EEG in individuals with vCJD does not typically show the characteristic periodic sharp wave complexes that are observed in sCJD24. vCJD neuropathology is characterized by florid plaques and extensive type 2B PrPres (ref.68,113) (Figs 4,6).

Fig. 6: Histological features of vCJD.

Frontal cortex section from an individual with variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (vCJD) showing a pathognomonic florid plaque (arrow), a fibrillar amyloid plaque surrounded by vacuolation (H&E staining, x400 magnification).

Surveillance programmes accurately mapped case ascertainment and the trajectory of the vCJD epidemic, which was focused primarily in the UK (178 cases) and France (28 cases). At the time of writing (March 2021), a total of 232 cases of vCJD have been identified from 12 countries or territories across Europe, the USA, the Middle East and Asia10 (Fig. 1). vCJD was causally linked to the epizootic of BSE, a novel prion disease affecting cattle, with the consumption of contaminated beef products being the primary source of vCJD infection92,114,115.

The BSE epizootic arose as a result of agricultural feeding practices that involved using ruminant-derived rendered meat-and-bone meal (MBM) to feed cattle11. However, the origin of BSE itself remains unclear. The most popular hypothesis is that material from a scrapie-infected sheep entered the cattle feed supply, with the scrapie agent becoming altered on passage through cattle, rendering it highly infectious11,116. Alternative hypotheses, which have garnered less consensus, include the scrapie agent being altered by the rendering process or the emergence of a novel transmissible spongiform encephalopathy in the UK, possibly in cattle, which then entered the ruminant feed chain11. The epizootic peaked in 1992 in the UK, with 37,280 new cases identified in cattle that year12. A host of stringent control measures were adopted117,118,119,120,121. In the UK, these measures consisted of a ban on feeding ruminant-derived protein to ruminants (1988)122; surveillance, reporting and culling of BSE-infected animals (1988)122; a ban on feeding specified bovine offal to humans (1989)122; and a ban on feeding specified bovine offal to all farmed animals (1990)122. The EU also introduced a ban on feeding mammalian protein to ruminants in 1994. These measures resulted in substantial suppression of BSE over the following years11,12,13 (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7: BSE and vCJD in the UK.

Graph shows the trajectory of the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) epizootic and the subsequent variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (vCJD) epidemic in the UK. Data obtained from refs12,288.

Following the identification of vCJD in 1996 (ref.25), plausibly linked to BSE123, there was a worldwide ban on British beef exportation124 along with a ban on feeding mammalian protein to farmed animals (1996 in the UK (ref.11), subsequently adopted by the EU in 2001 (ref.11)) and a ban on human consumption of cattle over 30 months old in the UK124,125. The British beef exportation bans were lifted a number of years later (2006 in the EU, 2020 in the USA)126,127,128,129. In the UK, >184,000 cases of BSE were identified during the epizootic12 and modelling estimates that the total number of cases was 1–3 million11, with >4 million cattle slaughtered as part of the containment response130. Dietary exposure of the UK population to BSE is likely to have been widespread131,132,133,134 and substantial population exposures occurred in nations importing British beef (both livestock and carcasses), in particular France135, the largest importer. Smaller domestic BSE epizootics were reported in >20 other countries, posing an additional means of exposure to non-UK citizens13. The incidence of BSE is now negligible; occasional cases continue to be reported but control measures are likely to prevent these animals from entering the human food chain136,137. The connection between BSE and vCJD was made on the basis of epidemiological evidence that vCJD cases were linked to geographical areas with BSE exposure risk, the observation of parallel epidemic trajectories several years apart (Fig. 7), and a series of transmission experiments and neuropathological studies that provided evidence that BSE and vCJD are caused by the same strain of prion protein123,138,139,140.

Existing CJD surveillance programmes141 were upgraded and new programmes initiated in the early 1990s following concerns over the potential for BSE transmission to humans29,30,142,143. With the identification of the first cases of vCJD in 1996 (refs25,26), many additional nations developed and upgraded CJD surveillance programmes144,145, leading to international cooperation, for example via the European Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease Surveillance Network, which is funded by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. International collaboration characterized the global vCJD epidemic10, which was centred in the UK. France experienced the second highest incidence of vCJD, which was thought to be largely as a result of the consumption of beef imported from the UK135,146. Spain had the third highest number of vCJD cases (five), three of which arose in a region with substantial rates of BSE in farmed cattle147. vCJD was also detected in nations that did not import British beef or have substantial rates of BSE, including Japan and the USA, and arose in individuals who had either spent time in the UK or in nations that imported British beef (such as Saudi Arabia)148. One individual in the USA was found to have vCJD in 2015 and had not spent time in the UK; this individual was thought to have been exposed prior to emigration to the US, presumably while living in Kuwait or Russia, nations known to have imported British beef27. This finding demonstrates that vCJD can arise across a broad geographical area.

Ongoing public health concerns


Extended incubation

Until 2016, all individuals with vCJD who underwent PRNP sequencing were found to have the MM c129 genotype108. One individual with vCJD and the MV genotype was identified in 2016 and was described in a paper by Mok et al.20, published in 2017. This individual presented at 35 years of age with personality change, later developing cognitive impairment, ataxia and myoclonus. MRI showed abnormal diffusion restriction in the basal ganglia, compatible with sCJD; medial thalamic changes were present but pulvinar nuclei were normal. CSF 14-3-3 protein levels were within the normal range and RT-QuIC produced a negative result. The total duration of disease from symptom onset to death was 16 months. Post mortem neuropathological analysis confirmed a diagnosis of vCJD. This was the first individual with the c129 MV genotype to have an autopsy-confirmed diagnosis of vCJD. However, another case of an individual with the MV genotype and suspected vCJD (on the basis of clinical and radiological evidence) was reported in 2009; autopsy of this individual was not performed149.

The Mok et al. case study20 added to growing concerns extrapolated from findings in iCJD5 and Kuru9 that prion disease transmission might be associated with extensive incubation (multiple decades) in individuals with non-MM c129 genotypes, adding weight to ongoing concerns of a ‘second wave’ of individuals developing vCJD. The exact incubation period of primary vCJD is impossible to calculate given the unknown timing of causative dietary exposure in affected individuals. The UK BSE epizootic was first detected in 1986 (ref.150), peaked in 1992 and fell to negligible numbers by the mid-2000s12; human exposure to BSE is likely to have been minimal after 1996 following the stringent control measures described above11,124. All confirmed cases of vCJD prior to 2016 were seen in MM individuals, with global vCJD deaths peaking in 2000 (ref.10). The individual described in the study by Mok et al.20 did not fulfil the diagnostic criteria for vCJD during life but did fulfil those for sCJD. This observation raises the concern that, in non-MM individuals, the disease might present with different demographic, clinical, radiological, biochemical and neuropathological features to the classical vCJD phenotype, analogous to the effect of c129 genotype on sCJD phenotypes17,151,152,153,154. Such phenotypic variation could make it difficult to detect vCJD and distinguish it from sCJD on the basis of previously validated diagnostic criteria110 (Box 2).

The individual in the Mok et al.20 study was considerably younger than is typical for individuals with sCJD. However, age might lack discriminatory value, as the paradigm that vCJD patients are typically younger than those with sCJD becomes increasingly flawed as time goes on — the BSE epizootic peaked in 1992 and 21 years have passed since the peak of the first wave of vCJD in 2000. If the final year for potential dietary BSE exposure is 1996, as is generally accepted, then, by definition, the youngest individuals to develop primary vCJD in 2021 would be 25 years old and must have been exposed early in life at the tail-end of the period of BSE exposure. The trends in vCJD incidence by birth cohort suggest that the highest vCJD risk follows exposure to BSE during youth and teenage years, with lower susceptibility in the very young155. No individuals born after 1990 have been diagnosed with vCJD in the UK155. The highest incidence of vCJD was seen in individuals born before 1980 and this is the population estimated to have received the largest dietary exposure to BSE134. Individuals born before 1980 will now be >40 years of age, substantially older than the individuals who comprised the first wave of vCJD infections (median age at onset 26.5 years) and overlapping with the age distribution seen in sCJD (median age at onset 67 years)1.

Although the scale of a potential second wave of vCJD is uncertain, extensive incubation in Kuru156 and iCJD108 is uncommon, which might partly reflect the lower attack rate in individuals with less susceptible c129 genotypes (generally MV5,9,15). This factor, in combination with extensive incubation periods, might lead to a more insidious incidence of new cases than was encountered in the most susceptible groups. Furthermore, prion diseases transmit more readily between individuals of the same species than between individuals of different species157,158. This characteristic is reflected in the significantly lower attack rate seen in primary vCJD secondary to BSE exposure (232 cases of vCJD worldwide10 despite widespread exposure in BSE-affected regions11,135) than in iCJD5,104 and Kuru9,94 (transmitted from human to human) and in the detection of several transfusion-mediated vCJD transmission events159,160. However, even with a low attack rate, the potential exists for further cases of vCJD, given the extensive BSE exposure in the UK and in other nations through domestic BSE cases and imports of cattle and beef products.

Peripheral distribution of PrPSc

In contrast to sCJD, in vCJD, PrPSc is widely distributed in the lymphoreticular system161,162,163. This peripheral distribution is associated with substantial public health concerns related to iatrogenic transmission through transfusion and surgical procedures. Evidence exists to support the hypothesis that vCJD is acquired through the gut, with gradual spread to the CNS via the lymphoreticular system164. A series of immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated prevalent PrPSc deposition in appendectomy samples from individuals in the UK165,166,167 (Table 1). Whether or not these individuals represent pre-clinical cases of vCJD and whether they pose a risk to public health through secondary transmission via surgical or medical procedures, blood products and organ donation is not yet clear165,166,167. In the initial study, published in 2004, researchers obtained samples from 14,964 appendectomies and 1,739 tonsillectomies and detected PrPSc in three appendices, giving an estimated prevalence of 1 in 4,000 (ref.165). In a subsequent study, published in 2013, PrPSc was detected in 16 appendices from a sample of 32,441 specimens, yielding an estimated prevalence of 1 in 2,000 (ref.166). The most recent appendectomy study167, published in 2020, aimed to measure the prevalence of PrPSc in groups not thought to have been exposed to BSE and thus analysed samples from individuals who either had their appendix removed before 1980 (n = 14,692), the estimated beginning of the BSE period, or were born after 1996 (n = 14,824), the year from which the exposure risk is presumed to have reduced to a minimum. PrPSc was detectable in the appendices of participants in both groups and the estimated prevalence (1 in 4,200) was not significantly different from that estimated in the above-mentioned 2013 study of a BSE-exposed population166,167. In the most recent study, the samples containing PrPSc were obtained from patients who underwent appendectomy, or were born, close to the margins of the presumed ‘at risk’ period, raising concerns that the time-window of exposure to BSE might have commenced in the late 1970s and continued beyond 1996 (ref.167), which is a longer period than previously recognized.

Table 1 Studies of PrPSc carriage in resected lymphoreticular tissues in the UK

Some cautionary notes regarding the appendectomy findings are necessary. First, the confidence intervals on the prevalence estimates are wide, making it difficult to estimate the extent of a possible epidemic relating to ongoing transmission. Second, Clewley et al. analysed 63,007 tonsil specimens from the UK obtained between 2004 and 2008 and did not find PrPSc in any specimen, including in the 32,661 samples obtained from individuals born prior to 1996 (ref.168). Given that the detection of PrPSc in tonsil is a highly sensitive diagnostic marker of vCJD — Hill et al.169 found detectable PrPSc in 100% of tonsil biopsy samples from vCJD-affected individuals and in 0% of individuals in groups with other CJD subtypes or alternative neurological conditions — this result seems surprising . However, the stage at which tonsillar involvement arises in vCJD is unknown169. In the study by Hill et al.169, all patients with vCJD had clinically advanced disease and, to our knowledge, there are no published reports assessing tonsillectomy specimens obtained at pre-clinical or early clinical stages in individuals who died of vCJD. In addition, most individuals that undergo tonsillectomy are young; in the study by Clewley et al.168, 50,254 samples (79.7%) were obtained from patients born after 1986. The oldest members of this cohort would have been 22 years of age in 2008, the conclusion of the study period, so samples might have been resected before the disease reached this tissue. Last, the implications of the presence of PrPSc in the appendix are unclear. One possibility is that PrPSc in the appendix reflects dietary exposure to BSE-associated PrPSc, but that only a small proportion of exposed individuals develop vCJD, perhaps influenced by factors such as age, gut maturity, c129 genotype and the total amount of BSE-contaminated material ingested. The factors that influence BSE transmission to humans remain a topic of debate, particularly as individuals living in the same household as an individual with vCJD, sharing a common environment and meals, have not been found to develop the disease. One exception was a mother and son in Spain who both developed vCJD; however, these individuals were from the region with the highest vCJD incidence in the country and are thought to have had dietary exposure to high-risk material147. The transmissibility risk in individuals with appendicular PrPSc is unknown. As the appendectomy studies165,166,167 were irreversibly anonymized, no participants were notified of being at-risk of CJD, a status that would carry numerous public health implications.

Blood products and transplantation

Three individuals in the UK were identified as having neuropathologically and biochemically confirmed vCJD related to the transfusion of non-leucodepleted red cells115,159,160,170,171. In addition, a case report by Peden et al.172 described an individual who received a blood transfusion from a donor and subsequently died of a non-neurological illness. This individual was found to have PrPSc in the spleen but not in the brain, suggesting subclinical infection via the donor, who was known to have developed vCJD172. The blood products given to these individuals were obtained from donors before clinical manifestation of vCJD and were transfused before the introduction of leucodepletion for all blood products in 1999 (refs159,173); no transfusion-transmitted cases of vCJD have occurred since this measure was introduced. Splenic PrPSc was identified at autopsy in an individual with haemophilia who was asymptomatic for neurological disease174. In this instance, PrPSc is thought to have been transmitted through pooled plasma products known to have included a donor with pre-clinical vCJD. Animal studies have demonstrated that vCJD and BSE can be transmitted via the transfusion of blood products175,176. In addition, spleen inoculum from the individual described in the report by Peden et al.172 was shown to transmit vCJD to mice177. This observation provides further evidence that individuals with pre-clinical vCJD harbour the potential for transmission.

Epidemiological modelling studies have produced a wide range of estimates of the extent and duration of a potential secondary transmission epidemic of vCJD in the UK178,179,180,181. These studies addressed the potential effect of variables, including incubation time, infectivity, c129 genotype and probability of developing subclinical carrier status, and the effectiveness of interventions such as leucodepletion and donation restrictions. One study concluded that a self-sustaining secondary epidemic was possible, although biologically implausible178. A detailed review of these studies is beyond the scope of this article but noteworthy are the results of the most recent modelling study, which was published in 2019 and predicted lower numbers of transfusion-associated vCJD cases than previous studies180. A particular challenge is estimating the number of individuals with sub-clinical vCJD from transfusion and the resulting risk of ongoing transmission.

International studies matching donor and recipient pairs have not identified the transfusion-mediated transmission of non-variant forms of CJD160,182,183. Case–control studies have provided conflicting evidence over whether blood products pose a risk of non-variant forms of CJD184,185, although the results of an Italian study using a prolonged look-back period suggested an association between blood transfusion and increased risk of these forms of the disease53. The prolonged incubation of prion diseases as well as difficulties in working with records and the potential for various forms of bias, pose challenges for epidemiological studies. Recipients of transfusion might die before manifesting CJD or disease manifestations could be obscured by the comorbid illnesses that necessitated transfusion. In 2017, a case report described two individuals who received UK-derived plasma products and died of autopsy-confirmed MM1-subtype sCJD186. This observation raises concerns but does not conclusively demonstrate causality.

Measures to mitigate the risk of blood product-associated CJD72,187 include leucoreduction, a ban on blood donations by previous transfusion recipients and individuals deemed to be at-risk of CJD, and restrictions on transfusing UK-derived plasma to UK residents born after 1996. The latter restrictions, which mandated the importation of plasma for UK use, were withdrawn in 2019 following a revised risk assessment that demonstrated a low probability of further vCJD deaths arising from plasma exposure187. In many nations, individuals who lived in BSE-exposed regions during the epizootic cannot donate blood; however, restrictions in the USA were partially lifted in 2020, partly owing to limitations in the blood supply related to the COVID-19 pandemic72. No validated means of testing donors for preclinical vCJD currently exists; such an assay would be invaluable. Protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic test for vCJD188,189 and can identify preclinical vCJD in blood189, although this finding needs to be replicated in larger cohorts before PMCA can be validated for screening purposes. Furthermore, PMCA has practical limitations as the process amplifies PrPSc, generating an infectious agent with substantial biohazard potential190,191,192. PMCA results also require time to process, which might be longer than the shelf-life of blood products, limiting utility as a screening test for blood donation. A successful screening test for vCJD would generate additional challenges, including the ethical considerations involved in notifying donors that they have possible preclinical vCJD but that their risk of developing this lethal disease is uncertain.

Potential for laboratory transmission

Strict occupational health measures govern all clinical and research activities concerning prion disease tissue samples193. Two laboratory workers who had worked with prion disease samples are known to have died from vCJD16. One individual, described in a case report by Brandel et al., had a clear history of a penetrating skin injury from an instrument used to handle BSE material 7.5 years before diagnosis16. This individual had a typical prodromal thalamic pain syndrome and neuropsychiatric features as well as a typical MRI with pulvinar and dorsomedial thalamic hyperintensities. RT-QuIC analysis of CSF was negative, PMCA of plasma and CSF was positive, and a definitive diagnosis of vCJD was provided post mortem. The individual had an MM c129 genotype. The interval between injury and clinical onset was consistent with the incubation period observed in individuals with transfusion-transmitted vCJD, suggesting that this injury was the vector for disease transmission as opposed to primary infection through the diet. An Italian lab worker who had worked with BSE and vCJD brain material died of vCJD in 2016 (ref.16) . In contrast to the individual described by Brandel et al.16, this individual had no history of accidental injury. Evidence exists that scrapie can be transmitted through scarification of the skin, adding to concerns of peripheral transmission of vCJD16. The potential for occupational exposure remains an important means of vCJD transmission.

sCJD and iCJD

Peripheral pathogenesis and iatrogenic transmission

Evidence of peripheral pathogenesis in sCJD is increasing194,195. Studies have now identified PrPSc in retinal and optic nerve tissue196,197, although at concentrations lower than those found in the brain. PrPSc has also been detected in intracranial portions of the vagus nerve, but extracranial portions have not been tested198. A recent study194 demonstrated detectable PrPSc in a range of peripheral tissues including skin and femoral nerve. The advent of amplification techniques, including RT-QuIC, has enabled the detection of PrPSc in peripheral tissues at concentrations below the threshold for detection by the traditional methods of immunohistochemistry and western blot analysis199,200. RT-QuIC is now a validated test for the diagnosis of sCJD from CSF and olfactory mucosal brushings64. RT-QuIC has detected PrPSc in the skin of individuals with sCJD and gCJD; PrPSc levels increased with disease duration200. Whether such levels of PrPSc are sufficient for transmission via surgical instruments is unclear. However, one study found that bone marrow from individuals with sCJD contains PrPSc that can be transmitted to transgenic mice expressing human PRNP201, adding to concerns around potential transfusion-mediated transmission as blood cells arise from haematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow.

Some case–control studies have identified an association between surgery, including abdominal procedures, and sCJD; however, these studies face similar challenges to those used to study blood transfusion, including the need for prolonged look-back periods and the potential for bias51,52,202. Evidence indicates that iCJD resulting from the peripheral injection of contaminated c-hGH has a substantially longer incubation period (mean 17 years) than iCJD resulting from neurosurgical instrument-mediated transmission (1.4 years for neurosurgical instruments, 1.3 years for stereotactic EEG needles and 12 years for hDM grafting)15. This observation suggests that the hypothetical iatrogenic transmission of CJD via non-CNS and non-ophthalmologic surgical and medical procedures could be associated with decades-long incubation. One study found that intracerebral inoculation with vCJD prion-contaminated steel wires can transmit vCJD to mice even when the wires have been subjected to conventional prion decontamination measures, including the use of sodium hypochlorite, sodium hydroxide and steam sterilization at 134 °C (ref.203). This finding raises concerns over the effectiveness of these procedures in sterilizing medical equipment. Unfortunately, tracing patients who have been exposed to shared instruments is more challenging than tracing the origin of blood products.

The urine of individuals with sCJD was not found to be infective when intracerebrally administered to mice204; however, small quantities of PrPSc have been detected in the urine of individuals with vCJD using PMCA205. The authors of one study raised concern about the safety of urine-derived human gonadotrophins following the detection of prion protein in samples206, but no evidence exists that recipients of urine-derived hormones are at increased risk of developing CJD. Whether PrPSc can be detected in the urine of individuals with preclinical vCJD and whether this PrPSc is present in sufficient quantities to enable transmission are not yet known.

Some studies assessing occupational risk have identified a possible increased incidence of sCJD among health-care workers compared with the general population202,207,208, although other studies have produced conflicting results202,207,209. A retrospective cohort study published in 2020 identified an increased incidence of sCJD among medical professionals in Germany compared with the general population210; the risk was highest among surgeons. These observations raise concerns over the potential for substantial occupational exposure with decades-long incubation. However, caution is advised in the interpretation of these occupational risk studies as there is potential for methodological biases to influence the results. For example, medical professionals have a heightened understanding and recognition of sCJD and epidemiological survey data on occupation is more complete in this group of individuals than in some other groups. The inherent limitations of case–control studies, such as the potential for recall bias, the effects of confounding variables and the inability to conclusively demonstrate a causal relationship211, should also be considered.

The rising incidence of sCJD

sCJD has been identified in many geographical regions2. In nations with sophisticated surveillance programmes, including the UK1, France2, Germany30, Australia47, Canada212 and the USA31, the numbers of reported cases of sCJD have increased over the last 30 years2,46,108,213,214. This increase is likely to be the result of a combination of factors, including better case ascertainment with heightened awareness, recognition of atypical phenotypes, the availability of more sensitive tests215 and revised diagnostic criteria57, and population growth and ageing owing to advances in medicine and public health. Currently unknown exogenous risk factors could also theoretically account for some of the observed increase in incidence of sCJD. Besides iatrogenic transmission, no evidence exists of person-to-person transmission of sCJD or vCJD216. Geographical clustering of individuals with sCJD has been described217, but the data do not support the existence of local point-source outbreaks or person-to-person transmission of the disease. Heightened local surveillance following reported cases could be one factor underlying spatial clustering218.

The observed increasing incidence of sCJD underscores the importance of the public health concerns described in this article. A national approach to CJD surveillance facilitates cooperation with national blood services and public health agencies, which is necessary for tracing exposed individuals and mitigating risk. In several nations, large-scale look-back studies are performed in conjunction with surveillance160,182,183 and are essential in identifying possible cases as well as in managing risk in exposed individuals. In summary, the increasing incidence of sCJD requires careful longitudinal evaluation in a manner that can only be achieved by systematic surveillance programmes.

Prion diseases with zoonotic potential

Chronic wasting disease

Chronic wasting disease (CWD) of cervids was first recorded in a captive deer in Colorado, USA, in 1969 and was classified as a spongiform encephalopathy on histological examination of brain tissue in 1978 (ref.219). Eight cervid species are susceptible to CWD; the disease was detected in five of these in natural conditions and the remaining three are susceptible to experimental transmission219. CWD has been detected in 26 states in the USA, in 3 Canadian provinces, and in Norway, Finland, Sweden and South Korea (the cases in South Korea were as a result of the transport of infected live animals)14,220. CWD was detected in a wild reindeer in Norway in 2020, highlighting the ongoing risk of CWD transmission221. In contrast to BSE, CWD emerges in free-ranging cervids, although the effect of animal husbandry, feeding and agricultural practices contributes to disease propagation220. In animals with CWD, PrPSc is easily shed into the environment through various secretions and excretions, including saliva222, urine223 and faeces224,225, can survive in soil for prolonged periods226,227, and is resistant to environmental challenges such as freeze–thaw cycles225,228. CWD is horizontally transmitted between living animals222 and through environmental exposure to PrPSc (ref.227). Carcasses are a vector and new animals entering a previously inhabited field can contract the disease, possibly through the consumption of plants growing at the site of carcasses as well as through the soil226. PrPSc is detectable in the flesh of infected animals229, raising the concern that dietary transmission to humans could be possible.

No proven instances of CWD-associated human prion disease have been reported. Evidence indicates that CWD can be transmitted via intracerebral inoculation to multiple non-cervid species230,231,232,233,234,235 as well as via oral or intracerebral exposure to squirrel monkeys236. However, evidence indicates that CWD is not transmissible by either route to cynomolgus macaques, which are a primate species genetically closer to humans than to squirrel monkeys237. Humanized transgenic mice expressing human PRNP are resistant to CWD infection, whereas transgenic mice expressing cervid PRNP are not238. However, in one study, CWD brain isolates were able to induce the misfolding of human PrPC in vitro239. In another study, transgenic mice expressing a form of human prion protein that overlaps with elk prion protein at residues 165–175 were susceptible to CWD inoculation, providing information on the structural elements underlying the species barrier240.

One study followed up a cohort of individuals who had been exposed to CWD-contaminated products in 2005; no evidence of prion disease or other neurodegenerative diseases emerged between exposure and the end of follow-up in 2011 (ref.241). Given that the incubation period for some forms of acquired CJD can be decades long, surveillance must continue to ensure the identification of any individuals who develop CWD-associated human prion disease. How CWD-associated human prion disease might manifest is unknown and it could be challenging to distinguish the new disease from other forms of CJD. vCJD was first identified when the UK surveillance system detected a novel prion disease with previously unseen clinical, radiological, biochemical and neuropathological features25. Therefore, large-scale national surveillance programmes are necessary to identify novel diseases that might be linked to CWD as well as to provide registry data for case–control studies on exposure risks, to enable follow-up of exposed individuals through cohort registries and to facilitate international liaison with veterinary surveillance programmes.

Human exposure to CWD is highly likely. A survey of 17,372 US residents found that 67.4% of respondents had consumed venison, much of it obtained from the wild, and 18.5% of respondents reported hunting as a pastime242. Without large-scale testing, the proportion of animals infected with CWD is unknown; estimates vary widely243,244 by region, species and between captive versus wild animals, with one study demonstrating a prevalence of 35.4% among white-tailed deer in Wyoming245. At present, validated means of screening slaughtered animals for CWD to ensure safe dietary consumption are not widely employed and current methods are highly time consuming220. Furthermore, prions can adhere to steel surfaces246,247,248 and instruments used for the slaughter and butchery of cervids are frequently not subjected to validated decontamination measures220. Finally, concerns exist over the potential for altered transmissibility after passage through intermediate host species. This has been demonstrated in CWD, wherein passage through ferrets extends the range of susceptible host species249, as well as in transgenic mice expressing human or porcine PrPC, which display an increased susceptibility to sheep-passaged BSE compared with non-sheep-passaged BSE250,251. In summary, although the zoonotic potential of CWD is unclear, the risk of human exposure is substantial.

Camel prion disease

A novel prion disease, termed camel prion disease (CPD), was detected in three symptomatic dromedary camels in Algeria in 2018 (ref.252). The PrPres signature of CPD did not match that of scrapie or BSE252, which raised several concerns. First, the disease was presumed to have arisen naturally; transmission of a prion disease from another species was not suspected, as no BSE had been detected in local cattle and naturally arising scrapie is not known to be present in Algeria252. Second, camels were the first non-ruminant species, other than humans, to naturally manifest prion disease, thus extending the spectrum of prion disease-susceptible animals252. Third, PrPSc was detectable in peripheral lymphoid tissues, raising concern for horizontal transmission252. Last is the possibility that the causative agent could undergo alteration on passage through an intermediate host, enhancing transmissibility, as discussed above.

Another camel with CPD was identified in Tunisia in 2019 (ref.253). Concerns now exist over the prevalence of this previously unrecognized transmissible spongiform encephalopathy, and recognition of cases will likely increase as a result of heightened awareness254. The global dromedary population is in the millions, with large populations in Africa and the Middle East, as well as in Australia255,256. The potential for human exposure to CPD is substantial; however, transmission studies will be necessary to determine whether the disease has zoonotic potential. Substantial constraints on resources as well as geopolitical instability in the regions affected by CPD pose major challenges; many affected countries do not have national CJD surveillance programmes.

Other protein-misfolding disorders

Starting in 2010, emerging evidence has indicated that misfolded proteins in non-prion disease disorders, such as Alzheimer disease, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Parkinson disease and motor neuron disease, could have prion-like characteristics, that is, protein-induced protein misfolding, cell-to-cell transmission and potential inter-subject transmissibility257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264. Amyloid-β pathology has been detected in recipients of c-hGH257,265, hDM grafting259 and childhood neurosurgery258, raising questions over the transmissibility of misfolded amyloid-β, which has been demonstrated in transgenic mice260,261. Evidence from preclinical studies and studies of recipients of fetal mesencephalic neuronal grafts suggests that α-synuclein can be induced to misfold in the presence of its misfolded form262. In mouse models, SOD1-linked motor neuron disease can be transmitted via the injection of spinal homogenates into the sciatic nerves263. Studies in transgenic mice have also demonstrated the transmissibility of tau pathology264. Taken together, these findings raise questions over whether other protein-misfolding disorders are transmissible between humans. However, the human studies mentioned above have small sample sizes and the public health implications of the potential transmissibility are still unclear. More evidence is required to establish whether these disorders harbour risks of transmission comparable to prion diseases.

Wider benefits of surveillance

Novel diagnostic strategies

Our ability to diagnose of CJD during life has greatly improved over the last several decades thanks to advances in MRI58 and CSF biomarkers64,65,266. The current diagnostic criteria for sCJD were revised in 2017 (Box 1) to include multifocal cortical ribboning on MRI and a positive RT-QuIC assay267,268,269. These revised criteria have a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 99% (compared with previously used criteria that had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 99%) and are likely to have contributed to the rising incidence figures57.

The prompt and accurate diagnosis of CJD during life confers multiple benefits. First, it enables public health measures, such as quarantining of potentially contaminated blood products and medical instruments, to be swiftly enacted. Second, it allows a transition from ineffective and potentially harmful empirical therapies (for example, immunosuppression) and life-prolonging therapies that do not enhance quality of life270 to palliative care in an appropriate facility. Third, it can rapidly rule out the possibility of CJD in individuals with a mimicking condition, such as autoimmune encephalitis, leading to appropriate, potentially life-saving, treatment271. Last, rapid diagnosis is essential for the recruitment of participants for clinical trials.

Clinical trials

CJD is rare and, with the exception of individuals known to be at-risk owing to prior exposures or individuals with inherited mutations, new cases arise in an unpredictable manner with no geographical focus. The latency to diagnosis is often considerable and the duration of survival following diagnosis is typically short. Several of these factors present challenges to clinical trials in CJD: sample sizes are small and the window of time available to enrol patients in studies and to assess the benefit of interventions is short. To date, few randomized controlled trials have been conducted and no interventions have been found to improve outcomes for individuals with CJD272,273,274,275,276,277,278. However, multinational clinical trials in CJD are feasible273 and surveillance programmes are instrumental for rapid diagnoses and in coordinating the enrolment of patients in trials, with scope for multinational collaboration to bolster sample sizes. Rapid diagnosis is particularly essential as therapeutic agents shown to work in preclinical studies might not be effective when irreversible neurodegeneration has already occurred.

Recommendations for ongoing surveillance

CJD is likely to be under-recognized in nations that lack sophisticated surveillance systems. Several reports from low-income and middle-income nations have described challenges relating to the diagnosis of CJD, including financial constraints, lack of testing facilities, underdeveloped health-care infrastructure, low numbers of neurologists, and regional disparities between rural and urban centres36,38,48,49,279. Geopolitical instability along with the burden of COVID-19 and other communicable diseases will pose further challenges to the ascertainment of CJD in some of these nations. Consequently, substantial public health risks might arise. Nations with established surveillance systems should provide support to those that are developing their programmes. Existing systems range from low-fidelity services, such as the review of death certificates (known to have limitations and to underestimate CJD incidence31), through to high-fidelity systems that include mandatory reporting, direct clinical assessment, and integrated specialist neuroradiology, genetic, biochemistry and neuropathology facilities closely aligned to public health services1,268. International collaboration enables the epidemiological comparison between nations as well as the enhanced recognition of atypical forms of prion disease.

A model surveillance system is shown in Fig. 8 and is a hybrid of the high-fidelity systems in place in the authors’ nations. The clinical assessment of individuals with suspected CJD can include case record review, liaison between local neurologists and national centres, and the direct assessment of cases by national specialists, in-person or through telehealth280,281 (of particular utility during the COVID-19 pandemic282). Surveillance centres are well placed for integration with biomarker laboratories for rapid diagnostic services as well as for research into newer-generation non-invasive biochemical and imaging biomarkers200,283 for early diagnosis and screening284,285, and instrument decontamination testing286. Crucially, ongoing surveillance can enable the recruitment of participants for the therapeutic trials that might one day offer hope to people affected by this devastating group of diseases287.

Fig. 8: A model CJD surveillance system.

A flowchart depicting a model system for comprehensive national Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) surveillance, based on a combination of systems used in the authors’ nations, is shown. This system provides a detailed diagnostic assessment including the ascertainment of the CJD subtype, screening for important epidemiological risk factors, and evaluating for and mitigating risks of transmission to others. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; PMCA, protein misfolding cyclic amplification; RT-QuIC, real-time quaking-induced conversion.


With the potential for UK population exposure to BSE over a longer period than was previously assumed, evidence of prevalent carriage of vCJD material in the lymphoreticular systems of healthy individuals, and concerns around secondary transmission through blood products and surgery, vCJD remains a priority for surveillance in Europe. Increasing numbers of sporadic and inherited CJD cases are now being recognized globally and evidence of sCJD disease pathogenesis outside of the nervous system suggests the potential for iatrogenic transmission. Individuals who develop iCJD after extensive incubation periods are still being identified globally and the spectrum of inherited prion diseases is ever increasing. Additional concerns arise around potential zoonoses, such as CWD and CPD, and novel findings that suggest the potential transmissibility of other protein-misfolding disorders. Large-scale surveillance with international cooperation remains a priority in order to recognize atypical cases of prion disease in humans as well as to minimize population exposure risks. Finally, national surveillance programmes are uniquely placed to study this devastating family of diseases, improving diagnosis and symptomatic treatment with the aim of finding a cure. We advise that prion disease surveillance remains a public health priority, including when other priorities such as COVID-19 risk take precedent.


  1. 1.

    National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit. 28th Annual Report 2019. Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Surveillance in the UK (2020).

  2. 2.

    Uttley, L., Carroll, C., Wong, R., Hilton, D. A. & Stevenson, M. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a systematic review of global incidence, prevalence, infectivity, and incubation. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, e2–e10 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kovacs, G. G. et al. Genetic prion disease: the EUROCJD experience. Hum. Genet. 118, 166–174 (2005). An international study on the epidemiology of genetic prion diseases in the Euro-CJD network nations.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Masters, C. L. et al. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: patterns of worldwide occurrence and the significance of familial and sporadic clustering. Ann. Neurol. 5, 177–188 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Brown, P. et al. Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, final assessment. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18, 901–907 (2012). A detailed summary of the iCJD epidemic worldwide.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Prusiner, S. B. Prions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13363–13383 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nobel Media. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1997 (2020).

  8. 8.

    Gajdusek, D. C. & Zigas, V. Kuru; clinical, pathological and epidemiological study of an acute progressive degenerative disease of the central nervous system among natives of the Eastern Highlands of New Guinea. Am. J. Med. 26, 442–469 (1959).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Collinge, J. et al. Kuru in the 21st century–an acquired human prion disease with very long incubation periods. Lancet 367, 2068–2074 (2006). A surveillance report on Kuru, a disease associated with endocannibalism in Papua New Guinea, demonstrating extensive incubation lasting several decades associated with prion protein codon 129 polymorphism status.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit. Variant CJD cases worldwide (2020).

  11. 11.

    Smith, P. G. & Bradley, R. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and its epidemiology. Br. Med. Bull. 66, 185–198 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    World Organization for Animal Health. Number of cases of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) reported in the United Kingdom (2020).

  13. 13.

    World Organization for Animal Health. Number of reported cases of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in farmed cattle worldwide (excluding the United Kingdom) (2020).

  14. 14.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) (2020).

  15. 15.

    Rudge, P. et al. Iatrogenic CJD due to pituitary-derived growth hormone with genetically determined incubation times of up to 40 years. Brain 138, 3386–3399 (2015). Case series demonstrating that human growth hormone-associated iCJD can incubate for several decades, influenced by prion protein gene codon 129 polymorphism status.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Brandel, J. P. et al. Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease diagnosed 7.5 years after occupational exposure. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 83–85 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Parchi, P. et al. Classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease based on molecular and phenotypic analysis of 300 subjects. Ann. Neurol. 46, 224–233 (1999). A large clinicopathological series on sCJD demonstrating the relationship between clinical features and the underlying genetics and neuropathology.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Palmer, M. S., Dryden, A. J., Hughes, J. T. & Collinge, J. Homozygous prion protein genotype predisposes to sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Nature 352, 340–342 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Collinge, J., Palmer, M. S. & Dryden, A. J. Genetic predisposition to iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Lancet 337, 1441–1442 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mok, T. et al. Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in a patient with heterozygosity at PRNP Codon 129. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 292–294 (2017). The first confirmed case of vCJD with prion protein gene codon 129 heterozygosity, a factor associated with prolonged incubation in other forms of acquired prion disease.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chen, C. & Dong, X. P. Epidemiological characteristics of human prion diseases. Infect. Dis. Poverty 5, 47 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Parchi, P. et al. Molecular basis of phenotypic variability in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Ann. Neurol. 39, 767–778 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Head, M. W. et al. Prion protein heterogeneity in sporadic but not variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: UK cases 1991-2002. Ann. Neurol. 55, 851–859 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tee, B. L., Longoria Ibarrola, E. M. & Geschwind, M. D. Prion diseases. Neurol. Clin. 36, 865–897 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Will, R. G. et al. A new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the UK. Lancet 347, 921–925 (1996). The original case series demonstrating a new variant of CJD in the UK with atypical features, identifying the beginning of the vCJD epidemic.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chazot, G. et al. New variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in a 26-year-old French man. Lancet 347, 1181 (1996). The first identified case of vCJD in France, following the recognition of vCJD in the UK the same year.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Maheshwari, A. et al. Recent US case of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease — global implications. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 21, 750–759 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Annual Epidemiological Report for 2017. (ECDC, 2020).

  29. 29.

    Brandel, J. P., Peckeu, L. & Haïk, S. The French surveillance network of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Epidemiological data in France and worldwide. Transfus. Clin. Biol. 20, 395–397 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Heinemann, U. et al. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Germany: a prospective 12-year surveillance. Brain 130, 1350–1359 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Maddox, R. A. et al. Prion disease incidence in the United States: 2003-2015. Neurology 94, e153–e157 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Geschwind, M. D. Prion diseases. Continuum 21, 1612–1638 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ladogana, A. et al. Mortality from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and related disorders in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Neurology 64, 1586–1591 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Horan, G. et al. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Ireland: epidemiological aspects 1980-2002. Eur. Neurol. 51, 132–137 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Velásquez-Pérez, L., Rembao-Bojorquez, D., Guevara, J., Guadarrama-Torres, R. M. & Trejo-Contreras, A. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Mexico. Neuropathology 27, 419–428 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Begue, C. et al. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance in Argentina, 1997-2008. Neuroepidemiology 37, 193–202 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Martins, V. R., Gomes, H. R., Chimelli, L., Rosemberg, S. & Landemberger, M. C. Prion diseases are undercompulsory notification in Brazil: surveillance of cases evaluated by biochemicaland/or genetic markers from 2005 to 2007. Dement. Neuropsychol. 1, 347–355 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Adam, A. M. & Akuku, O. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Kenya. Trop. Med. Int. Health 10, 710–712 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hajjaj, I. & Kissani, N. First case of presumed sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Marrakech, Morocco [In French]. Med. Trop. 71, 289–291 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Negm, M. & Hashish, E. Probable Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease — a case report at Suez Canal University Hospital, Egypt. Egypt. J. Neurol. Psychiatry Neurosurg. 55, 36 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Nozaki, I. et al. Prospective 10-year surveillance of human prion diseases in Japan. Brain 133, 3043–3057 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Shi, Q. et al. Analysis of the advantage features of Beijing surveillance network for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Prion 9, 304–314 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lolekha, P., Rasheed, A. & Yotsarawat, C. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in a tertiary care hospital in Thailand: a case series and review of the literature. J. Mov. Disord. 8, 136–140 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Qi, C., Zhang, J. T., Zhao, W., Xing, X. W. & Yu, S. Y. Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a retrospective analysis of 104 cases. Eur. Neurol. 83, 65–72 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lim, J. S. et al. Characteristics of Korean patients with suspected Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with 14-3-3 protein in cerebrospinal fluid: Preliminary study of the Korean Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease active surveillance program. Prion 9, 136–143 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Klug, G. M. et al. Intensity of human prion disease surveillance predicts observed disease incidence. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 84, 1372–1377 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Stehmann, C. et al. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance in Australia: update to 31 December 2019. Commun. Dis. Intell. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ahmad, A., Rao, F. & Aieshah, S. Two cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease from an ongoing dementia registry in Pakistan. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 64, 705–707 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kharel, H., Adhikari, P., Pokhrel, N. B., Kharel, Z. & Nepal, G. The first reported case of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease from Nepal. Clin. Case Rep. 8, 198–202 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Safar, J. G. Molecular pathogenesis of sporadic prion diseases in man. Prion 6, 108–115 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Collins, S. et al. Surgical treatment and risk of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a case-control study. Lancet 353, 693–697 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Mahillo-Fernandez, I. et al. Surgery and risk of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Denmark and Sweden: registry-based case-control studies. Neuroepidemiology 31, 229–240 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Puopolo, M., Ladogana, A., Vetrugno, V. & Pocchiari, M. Transmission of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by blood transfusion: risk factor or possible biases. Transfusion 51, 1556–1566 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    de Pedro Cuesta, J. et al. Sensitivity to biases of case-control studies on medical procedures, particularly surgery and blood transfusion, and risk of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neuroepidemiology 39, 1–18 (2012). A review article evaluating 18 case–control studies in sCJD demonstrating the methodological challenges involved in working with CJD.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Alperovitch, A. et al. Codon 129 prion protein genotype and sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Lancet 353, 1673–1674 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Cooper, S. A., Murray, K. L., Heath, C. A., Will, R. G. & Knight, R. S. Isolated visual symptoms at onset in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: the clinical phenotype of the “Heidenhain variant”. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 89, 1341–1342 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hermann, P. et al. Validation and utilization of amended diagnostic criteria in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance. Neurology 91, e331–e338 (2018). Prospective study validating the 2017 diagnostic criteria for sCJD demonstrating a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 99%.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Zerr, I. et al. Updated clinical diagnostic criteria for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Brain 132, 2659–2668 (2009). International study demonstrating the utility of MRI for the diagnosis of sCJD.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Tschampa, H. J. et al. Pattern of cortical changes in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 28, 1114–1118 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Steinhoff, B. J. et al. Diagnostic value of periodic complexes in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Ann. Neurol. 56, 702–708 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Schmitz, M. et al. Validation of 14-3-3 protein as a marker in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease diagnostic. Mol. Neurobiol. 53, 2189–2199 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Chohan, G. et al. The role of cerebrospinal fluid 14-3-3 and other proteins in the diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the UK: a 10-year review. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 81, 1243–1248 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Sanchez-Juan, P. et al. CSF tests in the differential diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology 67, 637–643 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Green, A. J. E. RT-QuIC: a new test for sporadic CJD. Pract. Neurol. 19, 49–55 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Cramm, M. et al. Stability and reproducibility underscore utility of RT-QuIC for diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 53, 1896–1904 (2016). International study demonstrating consistently high sensitivity of RT-QuIC and specificity of 99% for the diagnosis of CJD.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Atarashi, R., Sano, K., Satoh, K. & Nishida, N. Real-time quaking-induced conversion: a highly sensitive assay for prion detection. Prion 5, 150–153 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Ironside, J. W., Ritchie, D. L. & Head, M. W. Phenotypic variability in human prion diseases. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 31, 565–579 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Wadsworth, J. D. & Collinge, J. Molecular pathology of human prion disease. Acta Neuropathol. 121, 69–77 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Mead, S., Lloyd, S. & Collinge, J. Genetic factors in mammalian prion diseases. Annu. Rev. Genet. 53, 117–147 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Mead, S. Prion disease genetics. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14, 273–281 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Public Health England. Public health action following a report of a new case of CJD or a person at increased risk of CJD. (2015).

  72. 72.

    US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Recommendations to reduce the possible risk of transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by blood and blood components. (2020).

  73. 73.

    Mastrianni, J. A. The genetics of prion diseases. Genet. Med. 12, 187–195 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Bagyinszky, E. et al. Early-onset Alzheimer’s disease patient with prion (PRNP) p.Val180Ile mutation. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 15, 2003–2013 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Moore, R. C. et al. Huntington disease phenocopy is a familial prion disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69, 1385–1388 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Webb, T. E. et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity and genetic modification of P102L inherited prion disease in an international series. Brain 131, 2632–2646 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Paucar, M. et al. Genotype-phenotype analysis in inherited prion disease with eight octapeptide repeat insertional mutation. Prion 7, 501–510 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Oldoni, E. et al. PRNP P39L variant is a rare cause of frontotemporal dementia in Italian population. J. Alzheimers Dis. 50, 353–357 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Nitrini, R. et al. Prion disease resembling frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 59, 161–164 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Cracco, L., Appleby, B. S. & Gambetti, P. Fatal familial insomnia and sporadic fatal insomnia. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 153, 271–299 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Goldfarb, L. G. et al. Fatal familial insomnia and familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: disease phenotype determined by a DNA polymorphism. Science 258, 806–808 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Takada, L. T. et al. Genetic prion disease: experience of a rapidly progressive dementia center in the United States and a review of the literature. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 174, 36–69 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Shi, Q. et al. The features of genetic prion diseases based on Chinese surveillance program. PLoS One 10, e0139552 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Hsiao, K. et al. Mutation of the prion protein in Libyan Jews with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 324, 1091–1097 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Ladogana, A. et al. High incidence of genetic human transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in Italy. Neurology 64, 1592–1597 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Montagna, P., Gambetti, P., Cortelli, P. & Lugaresi, E. Familial and sporadic fatal insomnia. Lancet Neurol. 2, 167–176 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Jeong, B. H. & Kim, Y. S. Genetic studies in human prion diseases. J. Korean Med. Sci. 29, 623–632 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Melis, M. et al. Genetic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Sardinia: a case series linked to the PRNP R208H mutation due to a single founder effect. Neurogenetics 21, 251–257 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Beck, J., Collinge, J. & Mead, S. Prion protein gene M232R variation is probably an uncommon polymorphism rather than a pathogenic mutation. Brain 135, e209 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Rodriguez, M. M. et al. A novel mutation (G114V) in the prion protein gene in a family with inherited prion disease. Neurology 64, 1455–1457 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Katrak, S. M. et al. Familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in an Indian kindred. Ann. Indian. Acad. Neurol. 22, 458–461 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Will, R. G. Acquired prion disease: iatrogenic CJD, variant CJD, kuru. Br. Med. Bull. 66, 255–265 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Collinge, J. et al. A clinical study of kuru patients with long incubation periods at the end of the epidemic in Papua New Guinea. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363, 3725–3739 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Alpers, M. P. Review. The epidemiology of kuru: monitoring the epidemic from its peak to its end. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363, 3707–3713 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Duffy, P. et al. Letter: Possible person-to-person transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 290, 692–693 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Koch, T. K., Berg, B. O., De Armond, S. J. & Gravina, R. F. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in a young adult with idiopathic hypopituitarism. Possible relation to the administration of cadaveric human growth hormone. N. Engl. J. Med. 313, 731–733 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Boyd, A. et al. Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in Australia. Commun. Dis. Intell. Q. Rep. 25, 248–252 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Croes, E. A., Roks, G., Jansen, G. H., Nijssen, P. C. & van Duijn, C. M. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease 38 years after diagnostic use of human growth hormone. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 72, 792–793 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Brown, P., Brandel, J.-P., Preese, M. & Sato, T. Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: the waning of an era. Neurology 67, 389–393 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Ae, R. et al. Update: dura mater graft-associated Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease - Japan, 1975-2017. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly Rep. 67, 274–278 (2018). Most recently published report on dura mater graft-associated iCJD in Japan, the centre of the global epidemic.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Human Dura Mater (2003).

  102. 102.

    World Health Organization. WHO Infection Control Guidelines for Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies. Report of a WHO consultation Geneva, Switzerland, 23-26 March 1999. (WHO, 1999).

  103. 103.

    Cali, I. et al. Distinct pathological phenotypes of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in recipients of prion-contaminated growth hormone. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 3, 37 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Hamaguchi, T. et al. Insight into the frequent occurrence of dura mater graft-associated Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Japan. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 84, 1171–1175 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Abrams, J. Y. et al. Lower risk of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in pituitary growth hormone recipients initiating treatment after 1977. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96, E1666–E1669 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Brandel, J. P. et al. Distribution of codon 129 genotype in human growth hormone-treated CJD patients in France and the UK. Lancet 362, 128–130 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Zeidler, M. et al. New variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: neurological features and diagnostic tests. Lancet 350, 903–907 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit. Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Surveillance in the UK. 27th Annual Report 2018. (2019).

  109. 109.

    Spencer, M. D., Knight, R. S. & Will, R. G. First hundred cases of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: retrospective case note review of early psychiatric and neurological features. BMJ 324, 1479–1482 (2002). Cohort study of 100 individuals with vCJD describing the clinical features important for diagnosis and surveillance.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Heath, C. A. et al. Validation of diagnostic criteria for variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Ann. Neurol. 67, 761–770 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Collie, D. A. et al. Diagnosing variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with the pulvinar sign: MR imaging findings in 86 neuropathologically confirmed cases. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 24, 1560–1569 (2003). Large study characterizing the pulvinar thalamic abnormalities seen on MRI in vCJD.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Green, A. J. E. et al. Use of 14–3–3 and other brain-specific proteins in CSF in the diagnosis of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 70, 744 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Ironside, J. W. Neuropathology of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. C. R. Biol. 325, 27–31 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Ward, H. J. et al. Risk factors for variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a case-control study. Ann. Neurol. 59, 111–120 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Ironside, J. W. Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Haemophilia 16, 175–180 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Brown, P. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. BMJ 322, 841–844 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Food Standards Agency. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy. Food Standards Agency (2017).

  118. 118.

    World Organization for Animal Health. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) (2018).

  119. 119.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), or Mad Cow Disease. Control Measures (2018).

  120. 120.

    The European Parliament. Regulation (EC) no 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Official Journal of the European Communities L147/1-40. (2001).

  121. 121.

    BBC News. Timeline: British Beef Ban,live%20cattle%2C%20meat%20and%20products (2006).

  122. 122.

    Bradley, R. & Wilesmith, J. W. Epidemiology and control of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). Br. Med. Bull. 49, 932–959 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Collinge, J., Sidle, K. C., Meads, J., Ironside, J. & Hill, A. F. Molecular analysis of prion strain variation and the aetiology of ‘new variant’ CJD. Nature 383, 685–690 (1996). Landmark study demonstrating molecular characteristics and transmission properties of vCJD-associated prion protein with similarity to that seen in BSE, suggesting BSE was the source of vCJD.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Palmer Clephan, M. A week that shook the meat industry: the effects on the UK beef industry of the BSE crisis. Br. Food J. 98, 17–25 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Food Standards Agency. BSE and Beef. New Controls Explained. Advicsory Committee for Social Science (2006).

  126. 126.

    BBC News. UK Beef Export Ban Lifted by EU (2006).

  127. 127.

    European Commission. BSE: UK Embargo to be Lifted (2006).

  128. 128.

    BBC News. UK Beef Exports to US Resume after more than 20 years (2020).

  129. 129.

    Fickling, D. EU Lifts Ban on British Beef Exports (2006).

  130. 130.

    BBC News. ‘Mad cow disease’: What is BSE? (2018).

  131. 131.

    Cooper, J. D. & Bird, S. M. UK bovine carcass meat consumed as burgers, sausages and other meat products: by birth cohort and gender. J. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. 7, 49–57 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Cooper, J. D. & Bird, S. M. UK dietary exposure to BSE in beef mechanically recovered meat: by birth cohort and gender. J. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. 7, 59–70 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Cooper, J. D. & Bird, S. M. UK dietary exposure to BSE in head meat: by birth cohort and gender. J. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. 7, 71–83 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Chen, C.-C. & Wang, Y.-H. Estimation of the exposure of the UK population to the bovine spongiform encephalopathy agent through dietary intake during the period 1980 to 1996. PLoS One 9, e94020 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Chadeau-Hyam, M. et al. Estimation of the exposure of the French population to the BSE agent: comparison of the 1980-95 consumption of beef products containing mechanically recovered meat in France and the UK, by birth cohort and gender. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 12, 247–260 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Reuters. France confirms case of mad cow disease Reuters (2016).

  137. 137.

    BBC News. ‘Mad cow disease’ at Aberdeenshire farm after BSE confirmed (2018).

  138. 138.

    Bruce, M. E. et al. Transmissions to mice indicate that ‘new variant’ CJD is caused by the BSE agent. Nature 389, 498–501 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Lasmezas, C. I. et al. BSE transmission to macaques. Nature 381, 743–744 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Collinge, J. et al. Unaltered susceptibility to BSE in transgenic mice expressing human prion protein. Nature 378, 779–783 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Will, R. G., Matthews, W. B., Smith, P. G. & Hudson, C. A retrospective study of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in England and Wales 1970-1979. II: Epidemiology. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 49, 749–755 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Will, R. G. et al. Descriptive epidemiology of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in six European countries, 1993–1995. Ann. Neurol. 43, 763–767 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Puopolo, M. et al. Mortality trend from sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) in Italy, 1993-2000. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 56, 494–499 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Nakamura, Y. et al. Incidence rate of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Japan. Int. J. Epidemiol. 28, 130–134 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Case Western Reserve University. National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center (2021).

  146. 146.

    Brandel, J. P. et al. Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in France and the United Kingdom: evidence for the same agent strain. Ann. Neurol. 65, 249–256 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Riverol, M. et al. Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease occurring in mother and son. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 83, 235–236 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Coulthart, M. B. et al. A case cluster of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease linked to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Brain 139, 2609–2616 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Kaski, D. et al. Variant CJD in an individual heterozygous for PRNP codon 129. Lancet 374, 2128 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Wells, G. A. et al. A novel progressive spongiform encephalopathy in cattle. Vet. Rec. 121, 419–420 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Appleby, B. S. et al. Characteristics of established and proposed sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease variants. Arch. Neurol. 66, 208–215 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Hamaguchi, T. et al. Clinical diagnosis of MM2-type sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology 64, 643–648 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Krasnianski, A. et al. Clinical findings and diagnostic tests in the MV2 subtype of sporadic CJD. Brain 129, 2288–2296 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Meissner, B. et al. Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: clinical and diagnostic characteristics of the rare VV1 type. Neurology 65, 1544–1550 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    National CJD Research and Surveillance Unit. Estimation of the incidence of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease diagnoses and deaths in the UK January 1994-December 2011 (2012).

  156. 156.

    Klitzman, R. L. Incubation period of human prion disease. Lancet 368, 913 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Moore, R. A., Vorberg, I. & Priola, S. A. Species barriers in prion diseases–brief review. Arch. Virol. Suppl. 19, 187–202 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Hagiwara, K. I., Hara, H. & Hanada, K. Species-barrier phenomenon in prion transmissibility from a viewpoint of protein science. J. Biochem. 153, 139–145 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Hewitt, P. E., Llewelyn, C. A., Mackenzie, J. & Will, R. G. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and blood transfusion: results of the UK transfusion medicine epidemiological review study. Vox Sang. 91, 221–230 (2006). UK surveillance study demonstrating two cases of transfusion-transmitted vCJD and another case of pre-clinical vCJD.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Urwin, P. J., Mackenzie, J. M., Llewelyn, C. A., Will, R. G. & Hewitt, P. E. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and blood transfusion: updated results of the UK Transfusion Medicine Epidemiology Review Study. Vox Sang. 110, 310–316 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Wadsworth, J. D. et al. Tissue distribution of protease resistant prion protein in variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease using a highly sensitive immunoblotting assay. Lancet 358, 171–180 (2001). Autopsy study demonstrating peripheral presence of prion protein in the lymphoreticular system of individuals with vCJD.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Hilton, D. A. et al. Specificity of lymphoreticular accumulation of prion protein for variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J. Clin. Pathol. 57, 300–302 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Notari, S. et al. Multiorgan detection and characterization of protease-resistant prion protein in a case of variant CJD examined in the United States. PLoS One 5, e8765 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Hilton, D. A. Pathogenesis and prevalence of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J. Pathol. 208, 134–141 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Hilton, D. A. et al. Prevalence of lymphoreticular prion protein accumulation in UK tissue samples. J. Pathol. 203, 733–739 (2004). The first in a trilogy of studies demonstrating prevalent abnormal prion protein in resected appendix tissues derived from UK individuals exposed to BSE.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Gill, O. N. et al. Prevalent abnormal prion protein in human appendixes after bovine spongiform encephalopathy epizootic: large scale survey. BMJ 347, f5675 (2013). The second in a trilogy of studies demonstrating prevalent abnormal prion protein in resected appendix tissues derived from UK individuals exposed to BSE.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Gill, O. N. et al. Prevalence in Britain of abnormal prion protein in human appendices before and after exposure to the cattle BSE epizootic. Acta Neuropathol. 139, 965–976 (2020). The third in a trilogy of studies, demonstrating abnormal prion protein in appendices resected from UK individuals outside of the established window of exposure to BSE.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Clewley, J. P. et al. Prevalence of disease related prion protein in anonymous tonsil specimens in Britain: cross sectional opportunistic survey. BMJ 338, b1442 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Hill, A. F. et al. Investigation of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and other human prion diseases with tonsil biopsy samples. Lancet 353, 183–189 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Wroe, S. J. et al. Clinical presentation and pre-mortem diagnosis of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease associated with blood transfusion: a case report. Lancet 368, 2061–2067 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Llewelyn, C. A. et al. Possible transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by blood transfusion. Lancet 363, 417–421 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Peden, A. H., Head, M. W., Ritchie, D. L., Bell, J. E. & Ironside, J. W. Preclinical vCJD after blood transfusion in a PRNP codon 129 heterozygous patient. Lancet 364, 527–529 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Davidson, L. R., Llewelyn, C. A., Mackenzie, J. M., Hewitt, P. E. & Will, R. G. Variant CJD and blood transfusion: are there additional cases? Vox Sang. 107, 220–225 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Peden, A. et al. Variant CJD infection in the spleen of a neurologically asymptomatic UK adult patient with haemophilia. Haemophilia 16, 296–304 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Houston, F., Foster, J. D., Chong, A., Hunter, N. & Bostock, C. J. Transmission of BSE by blood transfusion in sheep. Lancet 356, 999–1000 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    McCutcheon, S. et al. All clinically-relevant blood components transmit prion disease following a single blood transfusion: a sheep model of vCJD. PLoS One 6, e23169 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Bishop, M. T. et al. Prion infectivity in the spleen of a PRNP heterozygous individual with subclinical variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Brain 136, 1139–1145 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Clarke, P., Will, R. G. & Ghani, A. C. Is there the potential for an epidemic of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease via blood transfusion in the UK? J. R. Soc. Interface 4, 675–684 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Garske, T. & Ghani, A. C. Uncertainty in the tail of the variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease epidemic in the UK. PLoS One 5, e15626 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Department of Health & Social Care. Risk assessment of the transmission of vCJD by blood components (2019).

  181. 181.

    Bennett, P. & Daraktchiev, M. vCJD and transfusion of blood components: an updated risk assessment. (Department of Health, 2013).

  182. 182.

    Crowder, L. A., Schonberger, L. B., Dodd, R. Y. & Steele, W. R. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease lookback study: 21 years of surveillance for transfusion transmission risk. Transfusion 57, 1875–1878 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Holmqvist, J. et al. No evidence of transfusion transmitted sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: results from a bi-national cohort study. Transfusion 60, 694–697 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Riggs, J. E., Moudgil, S. S. & Hobbs, G. R. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and blood transfusions: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Mil. Med. 166, 1057–1058 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Wilson, K., Code, C. & Ricketts, M. N. Risk of acquiring Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease from blood transfusions: systematic review of case-control studies. BMJ 321, 17–19 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Urwin, P. et al. Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in 2 plasma product recipients, United Kingdom. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 23, 893–897 (2017).

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    UK Government. Advisory committee on the safety of blood, tissues and organs. paediatric components working group - report. importation of plasma and use of apheresis platelets as risk reduction measures for variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (2019).

  188. 188.

    Concha-Marambio, L. et al. Detection of prions in blood from patients with variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 370ra183 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Bougard, D. et al. Detection of prions in the plasma of presymptomatic and symptomatic patients with variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 370ra182 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Castilla, J., Saá, P., Hetz, C. & Soto, C. In vitro generation of infectious scrapie prions. Cell 121, 195–206 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Moudjou, M. et al. Highly infectious prions generated by a single round of microplate-based protein misfolding cyclic amplification. mBio 5, e00829–13 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  192. 192.

    Cali, I. et al. PMCA-replicated PrP(D) in urine of vCJD patients maintains infectivity and strain characteristics of brain PrP(D): transmission study. Sci. Rep. 9, 5191 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Department of Health & Social Care. Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy agents: safe working and the prevention of infection. part 3: laboratory containment and control measures (2003).

  194. 194.

    Honda, H. et al. Abnormal prion protein deposits with high seeding activities in the skeletal muscle, femoral nerve, and scalp of an autopsied case of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neuropathology (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. 195.

    Glatzel, M., Abela, E., Maissen, M. & Aguzzi, A. Extraneural pathologic prion protein in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 1812–1820 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  196. 196.

    Takao, M., Kimura, H., Kitamoto, T. & Mihara, B. PrPres deposition in the retina is a common finding of sporadic, familial and iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob diseases (CJD). Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 6, 78 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  197. 197.

    Head, M. W. et al. Prion protein accumulation in eyes of patients with sporadic and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44, 342–346 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  198. 198.

    Kresl, P. et al. Accumulation of prion protein in the vagus nerve in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Ann. Neurol. 85, 782–787 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  199. 199.

    Orru, C. D. et al. Prion seeding activity and infectivity in skin samples from patients with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaam7785 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  200. 200.

    Mammana, A. et al. Detection of prions in skin punch biopsies of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease patients. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 7, 559–564 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  201. 201.

    Huor, A. et al. Infectivity in bone marrow from sporadic CJD patients. J. Pathol. 243, 273–278 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  202. 202.

    Ruegger, J. et al. A case-control study of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Switzerland: analysis of potential risk factors with regard to an increased CJD incidence in the years 2001-2004. BMC Public Health 9, 18 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  203. 203.

    Belondrade, M. et al. Correlation between bioassay and protein misfolding cyclic amplification for variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease decontamination studies. mSphere 5, e00649–19 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  204. 204.

    Notari, S. et al. Assessing prion infectivity of human urine in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18, 21–28 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  205. 205.

    Moda, F. et al. Prions in the urine of patients with variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 530–539 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  206. 206.

    Van Dorsselaer, A. et al. Detection of prion protein in urine-derived injectable fertility products by a targeted proteomic approach. PLoS One 6, e17815 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  207. 207.

    Wientjens, D. P. et al. Risk factors for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a reanalysis of case-control studies. Neurology 46, 1287–1291 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  208. 208.

    Cocco, P. L., Caperna, A. & Vinci, F. Occupational risk factors for the sporadic form of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Med. Lav. 94, 353–363 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  209. 209.

    Alcalde-Cabero, E. et al. Health professions and risk of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, 1965 to 2010. Euro Surveill. 17, 20144 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  210. 210.

    Hermann, P. et al. Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease among physicians, Germany, 1993-2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 26, 1710–1719 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  211. 211.

    Tenny, S., Kerndt, C. C. & Hoffman, M. R. in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing LLC., 2021).

  212. 212.

    Government of Canada. Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Surveillance System (CJDSS) Report (2021).

  213. 213.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, Classic (CJD). Occurrence and Transmission (2019).

  214. 214.

    Nishimura, Y. et al. A nationwide trend analysis in the incidence and mortality of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in Japan between 2005 and 2014. Sci. Rep. 10, 15509 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  215. 215.

    Rhoads, D. D. et al. Diagnosis of prion diseases by RT-QuIC results in improved surveillance. Neurology 95, e1017–e1026 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  216. 216.

    Murray, K. et al. Is there evidence of vertical transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 82, 729–731 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  217. 217.

    Puopolo, M. et al. Spatial epidemiology of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Apulia, Italy. Neuroepidemiology 54, 83–90 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  218. 218.

    Klug, G. M. et al. Enhanced geographically restricted surveillance simulates sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease cluster. Brain 132, 493–501 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  219. 219.

    Hannaoui, S., Schatzl, H. M. & Gilch, S. Chronic wasting disease: Emerging prions and their potential risk. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006619 (2017). Review article summarizing the chronic wasting disease epizootic in deer and elk.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  220. 220.

    Osterholm, M. T. et al. Chronic wasting disease in cervids: implications for prion transmission to humans and other animal species. mBio 10, e01091–19 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  221. 221.

    Våge, J. Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) identified in a wild reindeer at Hardanger Plateau (Norwegian Veterinary Institute, 2020).

  222. 222.

    Mathiason, C. K. et al. Infectious prions in the saliva and blood of deer with chronic wasting disease. Science 314, 133–136 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  223. 223.

    Haley, N. J. et al. Detection of chronic wasting disease prions in salivary, urinary, and intestinal tissues of deer: potential mechanisms of prion shedding and transmission. J. Virol. 85, 6309–6318 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  224. 224.

    Tamguney, G. et al. Asymptomatic deer excrete infectious prions in faeces. Nature 461, 529–532 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  225. 225.

    Tennant, J. M. et al. Shedding and stability of CWD prion seeding activity in cervid feces. PLoS One 15, e0227094 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  226. 226.

    Miller, M. W., Williams, E. S., Hobbs, N. T. & Wolfe, L. L. Environmental sources of prion transmission in mule deer. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10, 1003–1006 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  227. 227.

    Mathiason, C. K. et al. Infectious prions in pre-clinical deer and transmission of chronic wasting disease solely by environmental exposure. PLoS One 4, e5916 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  228. 228.

    Yuan, Q., Telling, G., Bartelt-Hunt, S. L. & Bartz, J. C. Dehydration of prions on environmentally relevant surfaces protects them from inactivation by freezing and thawing. J. Virol. 92, e02191–17 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  229. 229.

    Angers, R. C. et al. Prions in skeletal muscles of deer with chronic wasting disease. Science 311, 1117 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  230. 230.

    Raymond, G. J. et al. Transmission and adaptation of chronic wasting disease to hamsters and transgenic mice: evidence for strains. J. Virol. 81, 4305–4314 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  231. 231.

    Di Bari, M. A. et al. Chronic wasting disease in bank voles: characterisation of the shortest incubation time model for prion diseases. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003219 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  232. 232.

    Perrott, M. R., Sigurdson, C. J., Mason, G. L. & Hoover, E. A. Mucosal transmission and pathogenesis of chronic wasting disease in ferrets. J. Gen. Virol. 94, 432–442 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  233. 233.

    Mathiason, C. K. et al. Susceptibility of domestic cats to chronic wasting disease. J. Virol. 87, 1947–1956 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  234. 234.

    Hamir, A. N. et al. Transmission of chronic wasting disease of mule deer to Suffolk sheep following intracerebral inoculation. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 18, 558–565 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  235. 235.

    Hamir, A. N. et al. Experimental transmission of chronic wasting disease agent from mule deer to cattle by the intracerebral route. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 17, 276–281 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  236. 236.

    Marsh, R. F., Kincaid, A. E., Bessen, R. A. & Bartz, J. C. Interspecies transmission of chronic wasting disease prions to squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). J. Virol. 79, 13794–13796 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  237. 237.

    Race, B. et al. Lack of transmission of chronic wasting disease to cynomolgus macaques. J. Virol. 92, e00550–18 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  238. 238.

    Kong, Q. et al. Chronic wasting disease of elk: transmissibility to humans examined by transgenic mouse models. J. Neurosci. 25, 7944–7949 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  239. 239.

    Barria, M. A. et al. Molecular barriers to zoonotic transmission of prions. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 88–97 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  240. 240.

    Kurt, T. D. et al. Human prion protein sequence elements impede cross-species chronic wasting disease transmission. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 2548 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  241. 241.

    Olszowy, K. M. et al. Six-year follow-up of a point-source exposure to CWD contaminated venison in an upstate New York community: risk behaviours and health outcomes 2005-2011. Public Health 128, 860–868 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  242. 242.

    Abrams, J. Y., Maddox, R. A., Harvey, A. R., Schonberger, L. B. & Belay, E. D. Travel history, hunting, and venison consumption related to prion disease exposure, 2006-2007 FoodNet Population Survey. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 111, 858–863 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  243. 243.

    Williams, E. S. Chronic wasting disease. Vet. Pathol. 42, 530–549 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  244. 244.

    Miller, M. W. et al. Epizootiology of chronic wasting disease in free-ranging cervids in Colorado and Wyoming. J. Wildl. Dis. 36, 676–690 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  245. 245.

    Edmunds, D. R. et al. Chronic wasting disease drives population decline of white-tailed deer. PLoS One 11, e0161127 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  246. 246.

    Zobeley, E., Flechsig, E., Cozzio, A., Enari, M. & Weissmann, C. Infectivity of scrapie prions bound to a stainless steel surface. Mol. Med. 5, 240–243 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  247. 247.

    Flechsig, E. et al. Transmission of scrapie by steel-surface-bound prions. Mol. Med. 7, 679–684 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  248. 248.

    Luhr, K. M., Löw, P., Taraboulos, A., Bergman, T. & Kristensson, K. Prion adsorption to stainless steel is promoted by nickel and molybdenum. J. Gen. Virol. 90, 2821–2828 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  249. 249.

    Bartz, J. C., Marsh, R. F., McKenzie, D. I. & Aiken, J. M. The host range of chronic wasting disease is altered on passage in ferrets. Virology 251, 297–301 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  250. 250.

    Padilla, D. et al. Sheep and goat BSE propagate more efficiently than cattle BSE in human PrP transgenic mice. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1001319 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  251. 251.

    Espinosa, J. C. et al. Transgenic mice expressing porcine prion protein resistant to classical scrapie but susceptible to sheep bovine spongiform encephalopathy and atypical scrapie. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15, 1214–1221 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  252. 252.

    Babelhadj, B. et al. Prion disease in dromedary camels, Algeria. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 24, 1029–1036 (2018). First detection of a novel prion disease affecting camels in Algeria, not believed to be related to any known prion diseases.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  253. 253.

    World Organization for Animal Health. Camel prion disease: a possible emerging disease in dromedary camel populations? (2019).

  254. 254.

    Horigan, V. et al. Assessing the aggregated probability of entry of a novel prion disease agent into the United Kingdom. Microb. Risk Anal. 16, 100134 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  255. 255.

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Data: live animals (2020).

  256. 256.

    Northern Territory Government. Environment: animals. Feral camel (2015).

  257. 257.

    Jaunmuktane, Z. et al. Evidence for human transmission of amyloid-beta pathology and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Nature 525, 247–250 (2015). Autopsy study of eight individuals with iCJD demonstrating that amyloid-β may be transmissible via cadaveric hormone injection, analogous to prion protein.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  258. 258.

    Jaunmuktane, Z. et al. Evidence of amyloid-beta cerebral amyloid angiopathy transmission through neurosurgery. Acta Neuropathol. 135, 671–679 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  259. 259.

    Banerjee, G. et al. Early onset cerebral amyloid angiopathy following childhood exposure to cadaveric dura. Ann. Neurol. 85, 284–290 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  260. 260.

    Purro, S. A. et al. Transmission of amyloid-beta protein pathology from cadaveric pituitary growth hormone. Nature 564, 415–419 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  261. 261.

    Eisele, Y. S. et al. Peripherally applied Abeta-containing inoculates induce cerebral beta-amyloidosis. Science 330, 980–982 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  262. 262.

    Olanow, C. W. & Brundin, P. Parkinson’s disease and alpha synuclein: is Parkinson’s disease a prion-like disorder? Mov. Disord. 28, 31–40 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  263. 263.

    Ayers, J. I., Fromholt, S. E., O’Neal, V. M., Diamond, J. H. & Borchelt, D. R. Prion-like propagation of mutant SOD1 misfolding and motor neuron disease spread along neuroanatomical pathways. Acta Neuropathol. 131, 103–114 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  264. 264.

    Clavaguera, F. et al. Brain homogenates from human tauopathies induce tau inclusions in mouse brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9535–9540 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  265. 265.

    Hamaguchi, T. et al. Significant association of cadaveric dura mater grafting with subpial Abeta deposition and meningeal amyloid angiopathy. Acta Neuropathol. 132, 313–315 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  266. 266.

    Muayqil, T., Gronseth, G. & Camicioli, R. Evidence-based guideline: diagnostic accuracy of CSF 14-3-3 protein in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: report of the guideline development subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 79, 1499–1506 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  267. 267.

    National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit. Diagnostic criteria for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (2017).

  268. 268.

    National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit. Protocol. Surveillance of CJD in the UK (2017).

  269. 269.

    European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. EU case definition (2017).

  270. 270.

    McNiven, K. et al. Enteral feeding is associated with longer survival in the advanced stages of prion disease. Brain Commun. 1, fcz012 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  271. 271.

    Mead, S. & Rudge, P. CJD mimics and chameleons. Pract. Neurol. 17, 113–121 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  272. 272.

    Otto, M. et al. Efficacy of flupirtine on cognitive function in patients with CJD: a double-blind study. Neurology 62, 714–718 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  273. 273.

    Haik, S. et al. Doxycycline in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 13, 150–158 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  274. 274.

    Tsuboi, Y., Doh-Ura, K. & Yamada, T. Continuous intraventricular infusion of pentosan polysulfate: clinical trial against prion diseases. Neuropathology 29, 632–636 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  275. 275.

    Stewart, L. A., Rydzewska, L. H., Keogh, G. F. & Knight, R. S. Systematic review of therapeutic interventions in human prion disease. Neurology 70, 1272–1281 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  276. 276.

    Collinge, J. et al. Safety and efficacy of quinacrine in human prion disease (PRION-1 study): a patient-preference trial. Lancet Neurol. 8, 334–344 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  277. 277.

    Geschwind, M. D. et al. Quinacrine treatment trial for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology 81, 2015–2023 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  278. 278.

    Varges, D. et al. Doxycycline in early CJD: a double-blinded randomised phase II and observational study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 88, 119–125 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  279. 279.

    Barbosa, B. et al. Second-Generation RT-QuIC Assay for the diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease patients in Brazil. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 929 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  280. 280.

    Watson, N. et al. Application of telehealth for comprehensive Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance in the United Kingdom. J. Neurol. Sci. 420, 117221 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  281. 281.

    Appleby, B. S. et al. Feasibility of remote assessment of human prion diseases for research and surveillance. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 47, 79–90 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  282. 282.

    Klein, B. C. & Busis, N. A. COVID-19 is catalyzing the adoption of teleneurology. Neurology 94, 903–904 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  283. 283.

    Abu-Rumeileh, S. et al. Comparison between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for the early diagnosis and association with survival in prion disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 91, 1181–1188 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  284. 284.

    Cooper, S. K. et al. Detection of CWD in cervids by RT-QuIC assay of third eyelids. PLoS One 14, e0221654 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  285. 285.

    John, T. R., Schatzl, H. M. & Gilch, S. Early detection of chronic wasting disease prions in urine of pre-symptomatic deer by real-time quaking-induced conversion assay. Prion 7, 253–258 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  286. 286.

    Renard, D., Castelnovo, G., Collombier, L., Thouvenot, E. & Boudousq, V. FDG-PET in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: analysis of clinical-PET correlation. Prion 11, 440–453 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  287. 287.

    Vallabh, S. M., Minikel, E. V., Schreiber, S. L. & Lander, E. S. Towards a treatment for genetic prion disease: trials and biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 19, 361–368 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  288. 288.

    National CJD Research and Surveillance Unit. Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in the UK (by calendar year) (2021).

Download references


This work was carried out on behalf of the European Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease Surveillance Network, which is funded by European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.

Author information




S.P. and N.W. researched data for the article, made a substantial contribution to discussion of content, wrote the article, and reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission. J.-P.B., P.H., A.L. and J.M. made a substantial contribution to discussion of content and reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission. A.G., M.P. C.S. and I.Z. reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission. T.L. researched data for the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suvankar Pal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Neurology thanks B. Appleby, E. Belay and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

European Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease Surveillance Network (EuroCJD):

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watson, N., Brandel, JP., Green, A. et al. The importance of ongoing international surveillance for Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Nat Rev Neurol 17, 362–379 (2021).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing