Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

ALZHEIMER DISEASE

Nature and implications of sex differences in AD pathology

A new study has identified key differences between women and men with regard to the nature and burden of Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology in the brain. In addition to highlighting possible sex differences in AD pathophysiology, the findings could have important implications for the diagnosis and management of this condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Sex differences in Alzheimer disease.

References

  1. Scheltens, P. et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 388, 505–517 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mielke, M. M., Vemuri, P. & Rocca, W. A. Clinical epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: assessing sex and gender differences. Clin. Epidemiol. 6, 37–48 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnes, L. L. et al. Sex differences in the clinical manifestations of Alzheimer disease pathology. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 62, 685–691 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hohman, T. J. et al. Sex-specific association of apolipoprotein E with cerebrospinal fluid levels of tau. JAMA Neurol. 75, 989–998 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oveisgharan, S. et al. Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease and common neuropathologies of aging. Acta Neuropathol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1920-1 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buckley, R. F. et al. Sex, amyloid, and APOE ε4 and risk of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: findings from three well-characterized cohorts. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 1193–1203 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Altmann, A. et al. Sex modifies the APOE-related risk of developing Alzheimer disease. Ann. Neurol. 75, 563–573 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Damoiseaux, J. S. et al. Gender modulates the APOE ε4 effect in healthy older adults: convergent evidence from functional brain connectivity and spinal fluid tau levels. J. Neurosci. 32, 8254–8262 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alzheimer’s Association. 2018 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 367–429 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jack, C. R. et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 9, 119–128 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wiesje M. van der Flier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babapour Mofrad, R., van der Flier, W.M. Nature and implications of sex differences in AD pathology. Nat Rev Neurol 15, 6–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0115-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0115-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing