Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Considerations of sex as a binary variable in clinical algorithms

Nature Reviews Nephrology volume 20, pages 347–348 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Clinical algorithms that are used to guide medical decision-making often include sex as a variable. However, binary considerations of sex and/or gender might introduce bias due to potentially inaccurate assumptions about sex and gender-specific physiology, hormones and exposures. An equity-focused approach to sex and gender is essential when using clinical algorithms to ensure health equity across populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Lett, E., Logie, C. H. & Mohottige, D. Intersectionality as a lens for achieving kidney health justice. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 19, 353–354 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cary, M. P. Jr et al. Mitigating racial and ethnic bias and advancing health equity in clinical algorithms: a scoping review. Health Aff. (Millwood) 42, 1359–1368 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miranda, K. T. et al. A holistic framework for the evaluation of kidney function in a gender-diverse landscape. Am. J. Kidney Dis. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.01.522 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jankowska, M., Soler, M. J., Stevens, K. I. & Torra, R. Why do we keep ignoring sex in kidney disease? Clin. Kidney J. 16, 2327–2335 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chesnaye, N. C., Carrero, J. J., Hecking, M. & Jager, K. J. Differences in the epidemiology, management and outcomes of kidney disease in men and women. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 20, 7–20 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bairey Merz, C. N. et al. Sex and the kidneys: current understanding and research opportunities. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 15, 776–783 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Witchel, S. F. Disorders of sex development. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 48, 90–102 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaufman, M. R., Eschliman, E. L. & Karver, T. S. Differentiating sex and gender in health research to achieve gender equity. Bull. World Health Organ. 101, 666–671 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Alahamadi, Z. et al. Race, sex, and kidney disease trial participation. Kidney Med. 5, 100594 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gülgöz, S., DeMeules, M., Gelman, S. A. & Olson, K. R. Gender essentialism in transgender and cisgender children. PLoS ONE 14, e0224321 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chin, M. H. et al. A roadmap and best practices for organizations to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health care. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 27, 992–1000 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Tonia Poteat, Asa Radix, Selma Feldman Witchel.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Barbara T. Murphy Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Dinushika Mohottige & Samira Farouk

  2. Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Dinushika Mohottige

  3. Recanati Miller Transplant Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA

    Samira Farouk

  4. Division of Health Care in Adult Populations, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA

    Tonia Poteat

  5. Callen-Lorde Community Health Center, New York, NY, USA

    Asa Radix

  6. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    Asa Radix

  7. Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Selma Feldman Witchel

Authors
  1. Dinushika Mohottige
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samira Farouk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tonia Poteat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Asa Radix
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Selma Feldman Witchel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dinushika Mohottige.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohottige, D., Farouk, S., Poteat, T. et al. Considerations of sex as a binary variable in clinical algorithms. Nat Rev Nephrol 20, 347–348 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-024-00840-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-024-00840-2

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing