Abstract
Advances in standards of care have extended the life expectancy of patients with kidney failure. However, options for chronic vascular access for haemodialysis — an essential part of kidney replacement therapy — have remained unchanged for decades. The high morbidity and mortality associated with current vascular access complications highlights an unmet clinical need for novel techniques in vascular access and is driving innovation in vascular access care. The development of devices, biological approaches and novel access techniques has led to new approaches to controlling fistula geometry and manipulating the underlying cellular and molecular pathways of the vascular endothelium, and influencing fistula maturation and formation through the use of external mechanical methods. Innovations in arteriovenous graft materials range from small modifications to the graft lumen to the creation of completely novel bioengineered grafts. Steps have even been taken to create new devices for the treatment of patients with central vein stenosis. However, these emerging therapies face difficult hurdles, and truly creative approaches to vascular access need resources that include well-designed clinical trials, frequent interaction with regulators, interventionalist education and sufficient funding. In addition, the heterogeneity of patients with kidney failure suggests it is unlikely that a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach for effective vascular access will be feasible in the current environment.
Key points
-
Globally, effective treatment of kidney failure depends on reliable vascular access so that patients can receive long-term kidney replacement therapy.
-
Current vascular access options are arteriovenous fistula, graft or central venous catheter, each of which is associated with high mortality, morbidity and economic burden.
-
For fistulas, new devices, biological approaches and techniques are in development that control fistula geometry, manipulate underlying cell and molecular pathways and influence maturation.
-
New graft and catheter materials are also in development, encompassing both incremental changes in current technologies and novel bioengineered vascular materials.
-
Process of care innovations are also important in order to generate patient-centred approaches that will be applicable to all individuals with kidney failure.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hill, N. R. et al. Global prevalence of chronic kidney disease – a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11, e0158765 (2016).
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. United States Renal Data System https://www.usrds.org/2018/view/Default.aspx (2018).
GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388, 1459–1544 (2016).
Liyanage, T. et al. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review. Lancet 385, 1972–1982 (2015).
McCullough, K. P., Morgenstern, H., Saran, R., Herman, W. H. & Robinson, B. M. Projecting ESRD incidence and prevalence in the United States through 2030. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 30, 127–135 (2019).
International Society of Nephrology. ISN Global Kidney Health Atlas. 2nd ed. https://www.theisn.org/global-atlas (2019).
Swaminathan, S., Mor, V., Mehrotra, R. & Trivedi, A. Medicare’s payment strategy for end-stage renal disease now embraces bundled payment and pay-for-performance to cut costs. Health Aff. 31, 2051–2058 (2012).
Golestaneh, L. Decreasing hospitalizations in patients on hemodialysis: time for a paradigm shift. Semin. Dial. 31, 278–288 (2018).
Eriksson, J. K., Neovius, M., Jacobson, S. H., Elinder, C.-G. & Hylander, B. Healthcare costs in chronic kidney disease and renal replacement therapy: a population-based cohort study in Sweden. BMJ Open 6, e012062 (2016).
Liu, F. X., Treharne, C., Culleton, B., Crowe, L. & Arici, M. The financial impact of increasing home-based high dose haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. BMC Nephrol. 15, 161 (2014).
Kaplan, A. A. Peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis: present and future trends in the United States. Contrib. Nephrol. 189, 61–64 (2016).
Feldman, H. I. et al. Hemodialysis vascular access morbidity in the United States. Kidney Int. 43, 1091–1096 (1993).
Dalrymple, L. S. et al. Risk factors for infection-related hospitalization in in-center hemodialysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10, 2170–2180 (2015).
Feldman, H. I., Kobrin, S. & Wasserstein, A. Hemodialysis vascular access morbidity. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 7, 523–535 (1996).
Thamer, M. et al. Medicare costs associated with arteriovenous fistulas among US hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 72, 10–18 (2018).
Brescia, M. J., Cimino, J. E., Appel, K. & Hurwich, B. J. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N. Engl. J. Med. 275, 1089–1092 (1966).
Enzler, M. A., Rajmon, T., Lachat, M. & Largiader, F. Long-term function of vascular access for hemodialysis. Clin. Transplant. 10, 511–515 (1996).
Pisoni, R. L., Zepel, L., Port, F. K. & Robinson, B. M. Trends in US vascular access use, patient preferences, and related practices: an update from the US DOPPS practice monitor with international comparisons. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 65, 905–915 (2015).
Pisoni, R. L. et al. International differences in the location and use of arteriovenous accesses created for hemodialysis: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Am. J. Kidney Dis. 71, 469–478 (2018).
Bylsma, L. C., Gage, S. M., Reichert, H., Dahl, S. L. M. & Lawson, J. H. Arteriovenous fistulae for haemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 54, 513–522 (2017).
Dember, L. M. et al. Effect of clopidogrel on early failure of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299, 2164–2171 (2008).
Lee, T., Qian, J., Thamer, M. & Allon, M. Tradeoffs in vascular access selection in elderly patients initiating hemodialysis with a catheter. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 72, 509–518 (2018).
Roy-Chaudhury, P. et al. Neointimal hyperplasia in early arteriovenous fistula failure. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 50, 782–790 (2007).
Roy-Chaudhury, P., Sukhatme, V. P. & Cheung, A. K. Hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction: a cellular and molecular viewpoint. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17, 1112–1127 (2006).
Dixon, B. S. Why don’t fistulas mature? Kidney Int. 70, 1413–1422 (2006).
Lee, T. & Roy-Chaudhury, P. Advances and new frontiers in the pathophysiology of venous neointimal hyperplasia and dialysis access stenosis. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 16, 329–338 (2009).
Rajabi-Jagahrgh, E. et al. Influence of temporal variation in wall shear stress on intima-media thickening in arteriovenous fistulae. Semin. Dial. 26, 511–519 (2013).
Falk, A. Maintenance and salvage of arteriovenous fistulas. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 17, 807–813 (2006).
Yang, S., Lok, C., Arnold, R., Rajan, D. & Glickman, M. Comparison of post-creation procedures and costs between surgical and an endovascular approach to arteriovenous fistula creation. J. Vasc. Access. 18, 8–14 (2017).
Harms, J. C., Rangarajan, S., Young, C. J., Barker-Finkel, J. & Allon, M. Outcomes of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts with or without intervention before successful use. J. Vasc. Surg. 64, 155–162 (2016).
Lacson, E., Lazarus, J. M., Himmelfarb, J., Ikizler, T. A. & Hakim, R. M. Balancing Fistula First with Catheters Last. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 50, 379–395 (2007).
Rajput, A. et al. Venous aneurysms in autogenous hemodialysis fistulas: is there an association with venous outflow stenosis. J. Vasc. Access. 14, 126–130 (2013).
Mudoni, A. et al. Aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms in dialysis access. Clin. Kidney J. 8, 363–367 (2015).
Pasklinsky, G. et al. Management of true aneurysms of hemodialysis access fistulas. J. Vasc. Surg. 53, 1291–1297 (2011).
Valenti, D., Mistry, H. & Stephenson, M. A novel classification system for autogenous arteriovenous fistula aneurysms in renal access patients. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 48, 491–496 (2014).
Jankovic, A. et al. Arteriovenous fistula aneurysm in patients on regular hemodialysis: prevalence and risk factors. Nephron. Clin. Pract. 124, 94–98 (2013).
Shiraya, S. et al. Successful surgical remodeling of a giant venous aneurysm formed in an autogenous arteriovenous fistula: a case report. Yonago Acta Med. 61, 142–144 (2018).
Saleh, M. A., El Kilany, W. M., Keddis, V. W. & El Said, T. W. Effect of high flow arteriovenous fistula on cardiac function in hemodialysis patients. Egypt. Heart J. 70, 337–341 (2018).
Sequeira, A. & Tan, T.-W. Complications of a high-flow access and its management. Semin. Dial. 28, 533–543 (2015).
Al Shakarchi, J., Houston, G. & Inston, N. Early cannulation grafts for haemodialysis: a systematic review. J. Vasc. Access. 16, 493–497 (2015).
Ravani, P. et al. Associations between hemodialysis access type and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 24, 465–473 (2013).
Ravani, P. et al. Examining the association between hemodialysis access type and mortality: the role of access complications. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 12, 955–964 (2017).
Woodside, K. J. et al. Arteriovenous fistula maturation in prevalent hemodialysis patients in the United States: a national study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 71, 793–801 (2018).
Beathard, G. A. The treatment of vascular access graft dysfunction: a nephrologist’s view and experience. Adv. Ren. Replace. Ther. 1, 131–147 (1994).
Collins, M. J. et al. Therapeutic strategies to combat neointimal hyperplasia in vascular grafts. Expert. Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 10, 635–647 (2012).
Muto, A., Model, L., Ziegler, K., Eghbalieh, S. D. D. & Dardik, A. Mechanisms of vein graft adaptation to the arterial circulation: insights into the neointimal algorithm and management strategies. Circ. J. 74, 1501–1512 (2010).
Kherlakian, G. M., Roedersheimer, L. R., Arbaugh, J. J., Newmark, K. J. & King, L. R. Comparison of autogenous fistula versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft fistula for angioaccess in hemodialysis. Am. J. Surg. 152, 238–243 (1986).
Maytham, G. G. D., Sran, H. K. & Chemla, E. S. The use of the early cannulation prosthetic graft (Acuseal) for angioaccess for haemodialysis. J. Vasc. Access. 16, 467–471 (2015).
Allon, M. Dialysis catheter-related bacteremia: treatment and prophylaxis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 44, 779–791 (2004).
Klevens, R. M. et al. Dialysis surveillance report: National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)–data summary for 2006. Semin. Dial. 21, 24–28 (2008).
Lynch, J. R., Wasse, H., Armistead, N.C. & McClellan, W. M. Achieving the goal of the fistula first breakthrough initiative for prevalent maintenance hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 57, 78–89 (2011).
Clase, C. M., Crowther, M. A., Ingram, A. J. & Cina, C. S. Thrombolysis for restoration of patency to haemodialysis central venous catheters: a systematic review. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 11, 127–136 (2001).
Zacharias, J. M., Weatherston, C. P., Spewak, C. R. & Vercaigne, L. M. Alteplase versus urokinase for occluded hemodialysis catheters. Ann. Pharmacother. 37, 27–33 (2003).
Jassal, S. V., Pierratos, A. & Roscoe, J. M. Venous stenosis and thrombosis associated with the use of internal jugular vein catheters for hemodialysis. ASAIO J. 45, 356–359 (1999).
Hodges, T. C. et al. Longitudinal comparison of dialysis access methods: risk factors for failure. J. Vasc. Surg. 26, 1009–1019 (1997).
Allon, M. & Lok, C. E. Dialysis fistula or graft: the role for randomized clinical trials. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 5, 2348–2354 (2010).
Lin, E., Mell, M. W., Winkelmayer, W. C. & Erickson, K. F. Health insurance in the first 3 months of hemodialysis and early vascular access. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13, 1866–1875 (2018).
Rayner, H. C. et al. Vascular access results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): performance against Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) clinical practice guidelines. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 44, 22–26 (2004).
Rayner, H. C. & Pisoni, R. L. The increasing use of hemodialysis catheters: evidence from the DOPPS on its significance and ways to reverse it. Semin. Dial. 23, 6–10 (2010).
Stevenson, K. B. et al. Epidemiology of hemodialysis vascular access infections from longitudinal infection surveillance data: predicting the impact of NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 39, 549–555 (2002).
Akoh, J. A. & Patel, N. Infection of hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts. J. Vasc. 11, 155–158 (2010).
Katzman, H. E., Glickman, M. H., Schild, A. F., Fujitani, R. M. & Lawson, J. H. Multicenter evaluation of the bovine mesenteric vein bioprostheses for hemodialysis access in patients with an earlier failed prosthetic graft. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 201, 223–230 (2005).
Miller, L. M. et al. Hemodialysis tunneled catheter-related infections. Can. J. Kidney Health Dis. 3, 2054358116669129 (2016).
Bray, B. D. et al. Vascular access type and risk of mortality in a national prospective cohort of haemodialysis patients. QJM 105, 1097–1103 (2012).
Paoli, C. J., Reynolds, M. A., Sinha, M., Gitlin, M. & Crouser, E. Epidemiology and costs of sepsis in the United States–an analysis based on timing of diagnosis and severity level. Crit. Care Med. 46, 1889–1897 (2018).
Shah, S., Leonard, A. C., Meganathan, K., Christianson, A. L. & Thakar, C. V. Gender and racial disparities in initial hemodialysis access and outcomes in incident end-stage renal disease patients. Am. J. Nephrol. 48, 4–14 (2018).
Peterson, W. J., Barker, J. & Allon, M. Disparities in fistula maturation persist despite preoperative vascular mapping. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 3, 437–441 (2008).
Lee, H.-W. & Allon, M. When should a patient receive an arteriovenous graft rather than a fistula? Semin. Dial. 26, 6–10 (2013).
Zarkowsky, D. S. et al. Racial/ethnic disparities associated with initial hemodialysis access. JAMA Surg. 150, 529–536 (2015).
Nee, R. et al. Impact of poverty and health care insurance on arteriovenous fistula use among incident hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Nephrol. 42, 328–336 (2015).
Patibandla, B. K. et al. Disparities in arteriovenous fistula placement in older hemodialysis patients. Hemodial. Int. 18, 118–126 (2014).
Copeland, T. P., Hye, R. J., Lawrence, P. F. & Woo, K. Association of race and ethnicity with vascular access type selection and outcomes. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 62, 142–147 (2020).
Al-Balas, A. et al. The clinical and economic effect of vascular access selection in patients initiating hemodialysis with a catheter. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 28, 3679–3687 (2017).
Kheda, M. F. et al. Influence of arterial elasticity and vessel dilatation on arteriovenous fistula maturation: a prospective cohort study. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 25, 525–531 (2010).
Beathard, G. A., Arnold, P., Jackson, J. & Litchfield, T. Aggressive treatment of early fistula failure. Kidney Int. 64, 1487–1494 (2003).
Bharat, A., Jaenicke, M. & Shenoy, S. A novel technique of vascular anastomosis to prevent juxta-anastomotic stenosis following arteriovenous fistula creation. J. Vasc. Surg. 55, 274–280 (2012).
Sadaghianloo, N. et al. Increased reintervention in radial-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas with anastomotic angles of less than 30 degrees. J. Vasc. Surg. 62, 1583–1589 (2015).
Corbett, R. W. et al. Heterogeneity in the nonplanarity and arterial curvature of arteriovenous fistulas in vivo. J. Vasc. Surg. 68, 152S–163S (2018).
Chemla, E., Velazquez, C. C., D’Abate, F., Ramachandran, V. & Maytham, G. Arteriovenous fistula construction with the VasQ external support device: a pilot study. J. Vasc. Access. 17, 243–248 (2016).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03242343 (2020).
Chemla, E. et al. Arteriovenous fistula creation using the Optiflow vascular anastomotic connector: the OPEN (Optiflow PatEncy and MaturatioN) study. J. Vasc. Access. 15, 38–44 (2014).
Nikam, M. et al. Prospective controlled pilot study of arteriovenous fistula placement using the novel Optiflow device. J. Vasc. Surg. 61, 1020–1025 (2015).
Jia, L. et al. Effects of wall shear stress in venous neointimal hyperplasia of arteriovenous fistulae. Nephrology 20, 335–342 (2015).
Fitts, M. K., Pike, D. B., Anderson, K. & Shiu, Y.-T. Hemodynamic shear stress and endothelial dysfunction in hemodialysis access. Open Urol. Nephrol. J. 7, 33–44 (2014).
Robbin, M. L. et al. Prediction of arteriovenous fistula clinical maturation from postoperative ultrasound measurements: findings from the Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation Study. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 29, 2735–2744 (2018).
Loree, H. M. II et al. In vitro study of a medical device to enhance arteriovenous fistula eligibility and maturation. ASAIO J. 61, 480–486 (2015).
Majesky, M. W. Vascular development. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 38, e17–e24 (2018).
Conte, M. S. et al. Multicenter phase I/II trial of the safety of allogeneic endothelial cell implants after the creation of arteriovenous access for hemodialysis use: the V-HEALTH study. J. Vasc. Surg. 50, 1359–1368.e1 (2009).
Conte, M. S., Nugent, H. M., Gaccione, P., Roy-Chaudhury, P. & Lawson, J. H. Influence of diabetes and perivascular allogeneic endothelial cell implants on arteriovenous fistula remodeling. J. Vasc. Surg. 54, 1383–1389 (2011).
Peden, E. K. et al. A multi-center, dose-escalation study of human type I pancreatic elastase (PRT-201) administered after arteriovenous fistula creation. J. Vasc. Access. 14, 143–151 (2013).
Dwivedi, A. J. et al. Application of human type I pancreatic elastase (PRT-201) to the venous anastomosis of arteriovenous grafts in patients with chronic kidney disease. J. Vasc. Access. 15, 376–384 (2014).
Bleyer, A. J. et al. A randomized trial of vonapanitase (PATENCY-1) to promote radiocephalic fistula patency and use for hemodialysis. J. Vasc. Surg. 69, 507–515 (2019).
Proteon Therapeutics. Proteon Therapeutics announces top-line results from phase 3 PATENCY-2 clinical trial of vonapanitase in radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas: investigational vonapanitase did not meet co-primary endpoints. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/03/28/1781199/0/en/Proteon-Therapeutics-Announces-Top-Line-Results-From-Phase-3-PATENCY-2-Clinical-Trial-of-Vonapanitase-in-Radiocephalic-Arteriovenous-Fistulas.html (2019).
Kazemzadeh, G., Saberi, A., Manani, R., Sadeghipour, F. & Rahmani, A. Effect of local papaverine on arteriovenous fistula maturation in patients with end-stage renal disease. J. Bras. Nefrol. 41, 185–192 (2019).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02513303 (2020).
Paulson, W. D. et al. Safety and efficacy of local periadventitial delivery of sirolimus for improving hemodialysis graft patency: first human experience with a sirolimus-eluting collagen membrane (Coll-R). Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 27, 1219–1224 (2012).
Derderian, T. et al. To BAM or not to BAM?: a closer look at balloon-assisted maturation. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 27, 104–109 (2013).
Park, S. C., Ko, S. Y., Kim, J. II, Moon, I. S. & Kim, S. D. Balloon-assisted maturation for arteriovenous fistula maturation failure: an early period experience. Ann. Surg. Treat. Res. 90, 272–278 (2016).
Rizvi, S. A. et al. The clinical efficacy of balloon-assisted maturation of autogenous arteriovenous fistulae. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 41, 41–45 (2017).
DerDerian, T., Hingorani, A., Boniviscage, P., Carollo, A. & Ascher, E. Acute complications after balloon-assisted maturation. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 28, 1275–1279 (2014).
Patane, D. et al. Treatment of juxta-anastomotic stenoses for failing distal radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas: drug-coated balloons versus angioplasty. J. Vasc. Access 20, 209–216 (2019).
Swinnen, J. J., Zahid, A. & Burgess, D. C. A. Paclitaxel drug-eluting balloons to recurrent in-stent stenoses in autogenous dialysis fistulas: a retrospective study. J. Vasc. Access 16, 388–393 (2015).
Boitet, A. et al. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty for dialysis access fistula stenosis. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 29, 178–185 (2016).
Trerotola, S. O., Lawson, J., Roy-Chaudhury, P. & Saad, T. F. Drug coated balloon angioplasty in failing AV fistulas. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13, 1215–1224 (2018).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03041467 (2020).
Hull, J. E. et al. The pivotal multicenter trial of ultrasound-guided percutaneous arteriovenous fistula creation for hemodialysis access. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 29, 149–158.e5 (2018).
Hebibi, H., Achiche, J., Franco, G. & Rottembourg, J. Clinical hemodialysis experience with percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas created using the Ellipsys® vascular access system. Hemodial. Int. 23, 167–172 (2019).
Berland, T. L., Clement, J., Griffin, J., Westin, G. G. & Ebner, A. Endovascular creation of arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis access with a 4 Fr device: clinical experience from the EASE study. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 60, 182–192 (2019).
Lok, C. E. et al. Endovascular proximal forearm arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access: results of the prospective, multicenter novel endovascular access trial (NEAT). Am. J. Kidney Dis. 70, 486–497 (2017).
Arnold, R. J. G. et al. Comparison between surgical and endovascular hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula interventions and associated costs. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 29, 1558–1566.e2 (2018).
Inston, N., Khawaja, A., Tullett, K. & Jones, R. WavelinQ created arteriovenous fistulas versus surgical radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas? A single-centre observational study. J. Vasc. Access https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729819897168 (2020).
Dixon, B. S. et al. Effect of dipyridamole plus aspirin on hemodialysis graft patency. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 2191–2201 (2009).
Freeman, J. et al. Sustained thromboresistant bioactivity with reduced intimal hyperplasia of heparin-bonded polytetrafluoroethylene Propaten graft in a chronic canine femoral artery bypass model. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 49, 295–303 (2018).
Lazarides, M. K., Argyriou, C., Antoniou, G. A., Georgakarakos, E. & Georgiadis, G. S. Lack of evidence for use of heparin-bonded grafts in access surgery: a meta-analysis. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 29, 192–197 (2016).
Shemesh, D. et al. A prospective randomized study of heparin-bonded graft (Propaten) versus standard graft in prosthetic arteriovenous access. J. Vasc. Surg. 62, 115–122 (2015).
Baek, I. et al. Paclitaxel coating of the luminal surface of hemodialysis grafts with effective suppression of neointimal hyperplasia. J. Vasc. Surg. 55, 806–814.e1 (2012).
Lee, B. H. et al. Paclitaxel-coated expanded polytetrafluoroethylene haemodialysis grafts inhibit neointimal hyperplasia in porcine model of graft stenosis. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 21, 2432–2438 (2006).
Baek, I. et al. Paclitaxel coating on the terminal portion of hemodialysis grafts effectively suppresses neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine model. J. Vasc. Surg. 61, 1575–1582.e1 (2015).
Baek, I. et al. Suppression of neointimal hyperplasia by sirolimus-eluting expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) haemodialysis grafts in comparison with paclitaxel-coated grafts. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 27, 1997–2004 (2012).
Cagiannos, C. et al. Rapamycin-coated expanded polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafts exhibit decreased anastomotic neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine model. J. Vasc. Surg. 42, 980–988 (2005).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00448708 (2011).
Medgadget.Angiotech Suspends Vascular Wrap Trial Enrollment. https://www.medgadget.com/2008/04/angiotech_suspends_vascular_wrap_trial_enrollment.html (2008).
Nguyen-Lee, J. J. et al. Clinical experience with gore hybrid vascular graft in complex revascularizations demonstrates safety and efficacy. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 66, 646–653 (2019).
Gomez, L. F. & Peden, E. K. Description and early outcomes of the hybrid graft for dialysis. J. Vasc. Access 18, 64–67 (2017).
Gage, S. M. & Lawson, J. H. Challenging hybrid cases: how we do them. Endovasc. Today 2014, 13–16 (2014).
Gage, S. M. et al. An immediate access dialysis graft designed to prevent needle-related complications: results from the initial pre-clinical studies. J. Vasc. Access 21, 328–335 (2020).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03645681 (2020).
Kammer, J. A. & Mundy, K. M. Suprachoroidal devices in glaucoma surgery. Middle East Afr. J. Ophthalmol. 22, 45–52 (2015).
Bryers, J. D., Giachelli, C. M. & Ratner, B. D. Engineering biomaterials to integrate and heal: the biocompatibility paradigm shifts. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109, 1898–1911 (2012).
Kabirian, F., Brouki Milan, P., Zamanian, A., Heying, R. & Mozafari, M. Nitric oxide-releasing vascular grafts: a therapeutic strategy to promote angiogenic activity and endothelium regeneration. Acta Biomater. 92, 82–91 (2019).
Fleser, P. S. et al. Nitric oxide-releasing biopolymers inhibit thrombus formation in a sheep model of arteriovenous bridge grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 40, 803–811 (2004).
Arhuidese, I. et al. Bovine carotid artery biologic graft outperforms expanded polytetrafluoroethylene for hemodialysis access. J. Vasc. Surg. 65, 775–782 (2017).
Pineda, D. M. et al. Bovine carotid artery xenografts for hemodialysis access. J. Vasc. Surg. 65, 1729–1734 (2017).
Wystrychowski, W. et al. First human use of an allogeneic tissue-engineered vascular graft for hemodialysis access. J. Vasc. Surg. 60, 1353–1357 (2014).
McAllister, T. N. et al. Effectiveness of haemodialysis access with an autologous tissue-engineered vascular graft: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet 373, 1440–1446 (2009).
Tzchori, I. et al. Improved patency of ePTFE grafts as a hemodialysis access site by seeding autologous endothelial cells expressing fibulin-5 and VEGF. Mol. Ther. 26, 1660–1668 (2018).
Matsumura, G., Hibino, N., Ikada, Y., Kurosawa, H. & Shin’oka, T. Successful application of tissue engineered vascular autografts: clinical experience. Biomaterials 24, 2303–2308 (2003).
Geelhoed, W. J. et al. A novel method for engineering autologous non-thrombogenic in situ tissue-engineered blood vessels for arteriovenous grafting. Biomaterials 229, 119577 (2020).
Dahl, S. L. M. et al. Readily available tissue-engineered vascular grafts. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 68ra9 (2011).
Lawson, J. H. et al. Bioengineered human acellular vessels for dialysis access in patients with end-stage renal disease: two phase 2 single-arm trials. Lancet 387, 2026–2034 (2016).
Kirkton, R. D. et al. Susceptibility of ePTFE vascular grafts and bioengineered human acellular vessels to infection. J. Surg. Res. 221, 143–151 (2018).
Kirkton, R. D. et al. Bioengineered human acellular vessels recellularize and evolve into living blood vessels after human implantation. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaau6934 (2019).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02644941 (2020).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03183245 (2020).
Gage, S. M. et al. Multi-center experience of 164 consecutive Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow [HeRO] graft implants for hemodialysis treatment. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 44, 93–99 (2012).
Wallace, J. R., Chaer, R. A. & Dillavou, E. D. Report on the hemodialysis reliable outflow (HeRO) experience in dialysis patients with central venous occlusions. J. Vasc. Surg. 58, 742–747 (2013).
Maqsood, M. H. & Rubab, K. Quality of life of patients using the hemodialysis reliable outflow (HeRO) graft in hemodialysis. Cureus 11, 1–8 (2019).
Trump, D. J. Executive order on advancing American kidney health https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-advancing-american-kidney-health/ (The White House, 2019).
Linde, P. G. et al. Overcoming barriers in kidney health–forging a platform for innovation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 27, 1902–1910 (2016).
Archdeacon, P., Shaffer, R. N., Winkelmayer, W. C., Falk, R. J. & Roy-Chaudhury, P. Fostering innovation, advancing patient safety: the kidney health initiative. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 8, 1609–1617 (2013).
Hurst, F. P., Lee, R. E., Thompson, A. M., Pullin, B. D. & Silverstein, D. M. FDA regulatory perspectives for studies on hemodialysis vascular access. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13, 513–518 (2018).
Beathard, G. A. et al. Definitions and end points for interventional studies for arteriovenous dialysis access. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13, 501–512 (2018).
Shenoy, S. et al. Clinical trial end points for hemodialysis vascular access: background, rationale, and definitions. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13, 490–494 (2018).
Nexight Group. Kidney Health Initiative: Technology Roadmap for innovative approaches to renal replacement therapy https://www.asn-online.org/membership/BlastEmails/files/KHI_RRT_Roadmap1.0_FINAL_102318_web.pdf (2018).
Commins, J. HHS names KidneyX redesign phase 1 winners. HealthLeaders https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/innovation/hhs-names-kidneyx-redesign-phase-1-winners (2019).
Abbott, W. M. et al. Evaluation and performance standards for arterial prostheses. J. Vasc. Surg. 17, 746–756 (1993).
Allon, M. et al. Recommended clinical trial end points for dialysis catheters. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13, 495–500 (2018).
Chaudhry, M. et al. Seeing eye to eye: the key to reducing catheter use. J. Vasc. Access 12, 120–126 (2011).
Dorobanţu, L. F., Ştiru, O., Bulescu, C., Bubenek, S. & Iliescu, V. A. in Hemodialysis Ch. 30 (ed. Suzuki, H.) (IntechOpen, 2013).
Allon, M. & Robbin, M. L. Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: problems and solutions. Kidney Int. 62, 1109–1124 (2002).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of K.L. Hamilton (Humacyte, Inc., Durham, NC, USA) in collating information and references for this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
J.H.L. is the CEO of Humacyte, Inc. and is a co-founder of InnAVasc. L.E.N. is the founder of Humacyte, Inc. P.R.-C. is a consultant and adviser for WL Gore, BD, Medtronic, Cormedix, Humacyte, Akebia, Vifor-Relypsa and Bayer; the founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Inovasc LLC; the founding co-chair of the Kidney Health Initiative; and currently a member of the steering committee of the KidneyX Innovation Accelerator. P.R.-C. is also a co-PI on phase II of NIH Small Business award programs with Cylerus.
Additional information
Informed consent
The authors affirm that human research participants provided written informed consent for publication of the images in Fig. 2.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Nephrology thanks N. Inston, A. Yevzlin and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Related links
Kidney Health Initiative: https://khi.asn-online.org/
KidneyX Innovation Accelerator: https://www.kidneyx.org/
Glossary
- Maturation
-
Maturation in the context of fistula maturation is a dynamic remodelling process whereby the vascular wall thickens and the vein dilates in size to allow regular cannulation and blood flow for haemodialysis. Thrombosis, stenosis and poor blood flow can all contribute to a lack of clinical maturation.
- Juxta-anastomotic stenosis
-
Narrowing of the vessel at and around the anastomosis, typically due to neointimal hyperplasia. Juxta-anastomotic stenosis (that is, stenosis on the venous side within 3 cm of the anastomosis) is part of a larger collective term, ‘peri-anastomotic stenosis’, which also includes anastomotic stenosis and arterial stenosis.
- Secondary patency
-
The time from access placement until access abandonment or thrombosis, or the time from measurement of patency including intervening manipulations (surgical or endovascular interventions) designed to re-establish functionality in a thrombosed access.
- AV fistula aneurysm
-
A true arteriovenous (AV) fistula aneurysm is defined as an abnormal vessel dilation that may burst if not treated. The definition of a true AV access aneurysm is still under debate, but one proposed definition is an increase in vessel diameter of at least 50% with true dilation of all layers of the vessel wall.
- Primary patency
-
The time from access placement until any intervention designed to maintain or re-establish patency, access thrombosis, or the time from measurement of patency.
- Piggyback straight-line onlay technique
-
A fistula creation technique where the vein ‘piggybacks’ on the artery at the site of anastomosis, and the arterial blood flows into a straight cylindrical lumen. The cephalic vein in the subcutaneous plane is dissected and divided, and the cut end is over-sewn with prolene; it is moved medially over the artery, which lies in a deeper plane. A fistula is created between the posterior aspect of the vein and the anterior aspect of the artery. The outflow vein is dissected further in the subcutaneous tissue to obtain a straight line.
- End-to-side techniques
-
Techniques in which the fistula is formed by connecting the end of the vein to the side of the artery. This is the most common technique for creation of a radiocephalic fistula by connecting the end of the cephalic vein to the side of the radial artery.
- Plain old balloon angioplasty
-
(POBA). Also known as classic balloon angioplasty, this technique mechanically widens narrowed vessels by using a balloon to dilate the identified stenosis.
- Bovine carotid artery (BCA) grafts
-
A BCA graft (such as the Artegraft (Artegraft, Inc.)) is a xenograft used for vascular access in haemodialysis. These biological conduits are chemically fixed bovine carotid arteries, and no longer have the ability to remodel, repopulate with host cells or heal.
- Infiltration
-
Migration of cells from the outer layer of the blood vessel to the inner layers that mainly impacts inward remodelling and/or the development of neointimal hyperplasia.
- CE Mark
-
A certification used in the European Union (EU) to indicate that devices conform with health, safety and environmental standards set by the European Commission for products sold in the European Economic Area (EEA). Many devices require CE marking before they are able to be sold in the EU.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lawson, J.H., Niklason, L.E. & Roy-Chaudhury, P. Challenges and novel therapies for vascular access in haemodialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol 16, 586–602 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-0333-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-0333-2
This article is cited by
-
Erstellung des Gefäßzugangs zur chronischen Hämodialyse – Was ist Aufgabe des Nephrologen?
Die Nephrologie (2024)
-
Akute Interventionen – Rekanalisation von Dialyseshunts
Die Radiologie (2023)
-
Surgical Referral for Hemodialysis Access Maintenance
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (2023)
-
Implantable Artificial Kidney: A Puzzle
Biomedical Engineering (2021)