I would like to start with a story. At first glance, the tale may seem trivial — familiar, but inconsequential when framed against the backdrop of our larger issues in academia. But bear with me, because I think that this is a story that speaks to a much bigger problem.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Acknowledgements
F.M.D. is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC, #2003832) and the Novo Nordisk Foundation (#NNF20OC009705). The author thanks S. Chalmers and V. Ananthanarayanan for insightful discussions on DEI topics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, F.M. DEI conversations: more than a box-ticking exercise. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 24, 238 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00565-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00565-9
This article is cited by
-
The national institute on drug abuse diversity scholars network: success for a diverse addiction science workforce
Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)