Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • World view
  • Published:

DEI conversations: more than a box-ticking exercise

I would like to start with a story. At first glance, the tale may seem trivial — familiar, but inconsequential when framed against the backdrop of our larger issues in academia. But bear with me, because I think that this is a story that speaks to a much bigger problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Acknowledgements

F.M.D. is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC, #2003832) and the Novo Nordisk Foundation (#NNF20OC009705). The author thanks S. Chalmers and V. Ananthanarayanan for insightful discussions on DEI topics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felicity M. Davis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davis, F.M. DEI conversations: more than a box-ticking exercise. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 24, 238 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00565-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00565-9

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing