Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Re-evaluate evaluation letters — set scientists free!

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology volume 23, page 695 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Academia’s dependence on evaluation letters is toxic. Scientists know that bad letters might derail their career or even jeopardize their livelihood, and therefore compromise and take less risks. Alternative, less biased methods for assessing faculty for promotion purposes are urgently required.

I must start by thanking anyone who wrote me a good evaluation letter. I had many supporters, and I owe each and every one of them my career. Without them I wouldn’t have been hired as an Assistant Professor, gotten tenure, been promoted, and wouldn’t have reached the safe status of Full Professor. I can only afford to express this controversial opinion because I’m done getting promoted. Writing letters on my behalf took a lot of time and was a heavy duty, so before I start my rant, I must emphasize my sincere gratitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurobiology, Wise Faculty of Life Sciences & Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Oded Rechavi

Authors
  1. Oded Rechavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oded Rechavi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rechavi, O. Re-evaluate evaluation letters — set scientists free!. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 23, 695 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00535-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00535-1

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing