Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Mechanisms of microtubule organization in differentiated animal cells

Abstract

Microtubules are polarized cytoskeletal filaments that serve as tracks for intracellular transport and form a scaffold that positions organelles and other cellular components and modulates cell shape and mechanics. In animal cells, the geometry, density and directionality of microtubule networks are major determinants of cellular architecture, polarity and proliferation. In dividing cells, microtubules form bipolar spindles that pull chromosomes apart, whereas in interphase cells, microtubules are organized in a cell type-specific fashion, which strongly correlates with cell physiology. In motile cells, such as fibroblasts and immune cells, microtubules are organized as radial asters, whereas in immotile epithelial and neuronal cells and in muscles, microtubules form parallel or antiparallel arrays and cortical meshworks. Here, we review recent work addressing how the formation of such microtubule networks is driven by the plethora of microtubule regulatory proteins. These include proteins that nucleate or anchor microtubule ends at different cellular structures and those that sever or move microtubules, as well as regulators of microtubule elongation, stability, bundling or modifications. The emerging picture, although still very incomplete, shows a remarkable diversity of cell-specific mechanisms that employ conserved building blocks to adjust microtubule organization in order to facilitate different cellular functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Microtubule-organizing centres found in differentiated animal cells.
Fig. 2: Regulation of microtubule growth and stabilization.
Fig. 3: Microtubule sliding and reorientation.
Fig. 4: Microtubule organization in major mammalian cell types.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kapitein, L. C. & Hoogenraad, C. C. Building the neuronal microtubule cytoskeleton. Neuron 87, 492–506 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cuenca-Zamora, E. J., Ferrer-Marin, F., Rivera, J. & Teruel-Montoya, R. Tubulin in platelets: when the shape matters. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 3484 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Caporizzo, M. A., Chen, C. Y. & Prosser, B. L. Cardiac microtubules in health and heart disease. Exp. Biol. Med. 244, 1255–1272 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitchison, T. J. & Field, C. M. Self-organization of cellular units. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 37, 23–42 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Roostalu, J. & Surrey, T. Microtubule nucleation: beyond the template. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 702–710 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tovey, C. A. & Conduit, P. T. Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin complexes and beyond. Essays Biochem. 62, 765–780 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin, T. C., Neuner, A. & Schiebel, E. Targeting of γ-tubulin complexes to microtubule organizing centers: conservation and divergence. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 296–307 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hannak, E. et al. The kinetically dominant assembly pathway for centrosomal asters in Caenorhabditis elegans is γ-tubulin dependent. J. Cell Biol. 157, 591–602 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rogers, G. C., Rusan, N. M., Peifer, M. & Rogers, S. L. A multicomponent assembly pathway contributes to the formation of acentrosomal microtubule arrays in interphase Drosophila cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 3163–3178 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsuchiya, K. & Goshima, G. Microtubule-associated proteins promote microtubule generation in the absence of γ-tubulin in human colon cancer cells. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202104114 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, S. et al. NOCA-1 functions with γ-tubulin and in parallel to Patronin to assemble non-centrosomal microtubule arrays in C. elegans. eLife 4, e08649 (2015). This study demonstrates how two pathways of microtubule minus-end organization can synergize or work in parallel to form non-centrosomal microtubule arrays in different cell types.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sallee, M. D., Zonka, J. C., Skokan, T. D., Raftrey, B. C. & Feldman, J. L. Tissue-specific degradation of essential centrosome components reveals distinct microtubule populations at microtubule organizing centers. PLoS Biol. 16, e2005189 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng, Y. et al. A perinuclear microtubule-organizing centre controls nuclear positioning and basement membrane secretion. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 297–309 (2020). This paper describes an unconventional, γ-TuRC-independent pathway of microtubule organization acting at the nuclear envelope of fly fat body cells.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. King, M. R. & Petry, S. Phase separation of TPX2 enhances and spatially coordinates microtubule nucleation. Nat. Commun. 11, 270 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Woodruff, J. B. et al. The centrosome is a selective condensate that nucleates microtubules by concentrating tubulin. Cell 169, 1066–1077 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roostalu, J., Cade, N. I. & Surrey, T. Complementary activities of TPX2 and chTOG constitute an efficient importin-regulated microtubule nucleation module. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 1422–1434 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Manka, S. W. & Moores, C. A. Pseudo-repeats in doublecortin make distinct mechanistic contributions to microtubule regulation. EMBO Rep. 21, e51534 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Aher, A. et al. CLASP mediates microtubule repair by restricting lattice damage and regulating tubulin incorporation. Curr. Biol. 30, 2175–2183 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Abal, M. et al. Microtubule release from the centrosome in migrating cells. J. Cell Biol. 159, 731–737 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldspink, D. A. et al. Ninein is essential for apico-basal microtubule formation and CLIP-170 facilitates its redeployment to non-centrosomal microtubule organizing centres. Open. Biol. 7, 160274 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Delgehyr, N., Sillibourne, J. & Bornens, M. Microtubule nucleation and anchoring at the centrosome are independent processes linked by ninein function. J. Cell Sci. 118, 1565–1575 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lechler, T. & Fuchs, E. Desmoplakin: an unexpected regulator of microtubule organization in the epidermis. J. Cell Biol. 176, 147–154 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lecland, N., Hsu, C. Y., Chemin, C., Merdes, A. & Bierkamp, C. Epidermal development requires ninein for spindle orientation and cortical microtubule organization. Life Sci. Alliance 2, e201900373 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Meng, W., Mushika, Y., Ichii, T. & Takeichi, M. Anchorage of microtubule minus ends to adherens junctions regulates epithelial cell–cell contacts. Cell 135, 948–959 (2008). This landmark study presents the first functional description of a CAMSAP/Patronin family member and shows that it is involved in microtubule organization at cell–cell junctions.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Goodwin, S. S. & Vale, R. D. Patronin regulates the microtubule network by protecting microtubule minus ends. Cell 143, 263–274 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang, K. et al. Microtubule minus-end stabilization by polymerization-driven CAMSAP deposition. Dev. Cell 28, 295–309 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hernandez-Vega, A. et al. Local nucleation of microtubule bundles through tubulin concentration into a condensed tau phase. Cell Rep. 20, 2304–2312 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Imasaki, T. et al. CAMSAP2 organizes a γ-tubulin-independent microtubule nucleation centre. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.01.433304 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu, J. et al. Molecular pathway of microtubule organization at the Golgi apparatus. Dev. Cell 39, 44–60 (2016). This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the pathways of microtubule nucleation and anchoring at the Golgi apparatus.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Coquand, L. et al. CAMSAPs organize an acentrosomal microtubule network from basal varicosities in radial glial cells. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202003151 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Noordstra, I. et al. Control of apico-basal epithelial polarity by the microtubule minus-end-binding protein CAMSAP3 and spectraplakin ACF7. J. Cell Sci. 129, 4278–4288 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Khanal, I., Elbediwy, A., Diaz de la Loza Mdel, C., Fletcher, G. C. & Thompson, B. J. Shot and Patronin polarise microtubules to direct membrane traffic and biogenesis of microvilli in epithelia. J. Cell Sci. 129, 2651–2659 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Martin, M. & Akhmanova, A. Coming into focus: mechanisms of microtubule minus-end organization. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 574–588 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dong, C. et al. CAMSAP3 accumulates in the pericentrosomal area and accompanies microtubule release from the centrosome via katanin. J. Cell Sci. 130, 1709–1715 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gillard, G., Girdler, G. & Roper, K. A release-and-capture mechanism generates an essential non-centrosomal microtubule array during tube budding. Nat. Commun. 12, 4096 (2021). This paper shows how a microtubule array formed by severing and minus-end stabilization affects tissue morphogenesis.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Muroyama, A., Seldin, L. & Lechler, T. Divergent regulation of functionally distinct γ-tubulin complexes during differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 213, 679–692 (2016). This paper provides important insights into switching from a centrosomal to a non-centrosomal microtubule array during cell differentiation and into the role of γ-TuRC-associated proteins in this process.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Stiess, M. et al. Axon extension occurs independently of centrosomal microtubule nucleation. Science 327, 704–707 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Muroyama, A. & Lechler, T. Microtubule organization, dynamics and functions in differentiated cells. Development 144, 3012–3021 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, X. et al. Cell-type-specific alternative splicing governs cell fate in the developing cerebral cortex. Cell 166, 1147–1162 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhu, X. & Kaverina, I. Golgi as an MTOC: making microtubules for its own good. Histochem. Cell Biol. 140, 361–367 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Liang, X. et al. Growth cone-localized microtubule organizing center establishes microtubule orientation in dendrites. eLife 9, e56547 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Bernabe-Rubio, M. & Alonso, M. A. Routes and machinery of primary cilium biogenesis. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 74, 4077–4095 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pitaval, A. et al. Microtubule stabilization drives 3D centrosome migration to initiate primary ciliogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 216, 3713–3728 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Garbrecht, J., Laos, T., Holzer, E., Dillinger, M. & Dammermann, A. An acentriolar centrosome at the C. elegans ciliary base. Curr. Biol. 31, 2418–2428.e8 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Magescas, J., Eskinazi, S., Tran, M. V. & Feldman, J. L. Centriole-less pericentriolar material serves as a microtubule organizing center at the base of C. elegans sensory cilia. Curr. Biol. 31, 2410–2417 (2021). Together with Garbrecht et al. (2021), this work provides molecular and functional insight into the formation of an acentriolar MTOC located at the ciliary base in worm neurons.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Spassky, N. & Meunier, A. The development and functions of multiciliated epithelia. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 423–436 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Clare, D. K. et al. Basal foot MTOC organizes pillar MTs required for coordination of beating cilia. Nat. Commun. 5, 4888 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tateishi, K., Nishida, T., Inoue, K. & Tsukita, S. Three-dimensional organization of layered apical cytoskeletal networks associated with mouse airway tissue development. Sci. Rep. 7, 43783 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Mercey, O. et al. Massive centriole production can occur in the absence of deuterosomes in multiciliated cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1544–1552 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Usami, F. M. et al. Intercellular and intracellular cilia orientation is coordinated by CELSR1 and CAMSAP3 in oviduct multi-ciliated cells. J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs257006 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Robinson, A. M. et al. CAMSAP3 facilitates basal body polarity and the formation of the central pair of microtubules in motile cilia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 13571–13579 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Rios, R. M. The centrosome–Golgi apparatus nexus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 369, 20130462 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Rivero, S., Cardenas, J., Bornens, M. & Rios, R. M. Microtubule nucleation at the cis-side of the Golgi apparatus requires AKAP450 and GM130. EMBO J. 28, 1016–1028 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Gavilan, M. P. et al. The dual role of the centrosome in organizing the microtubule network in interphase. EMBO Rep. 19, e45942 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Yang, C. et al. EB1 and EB3 regulate microtubule minus end organization and Golgi morphology. J. Cell Biol. 216, 3179–3198 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Efimov, A. et al. Asymmetric CLASP-dependent nucleation of noncentrosomal microtubules at the trans-Golgi network. Dev. Cell 12, 917–930 (2007). This study convincingly demonstrates that the Golgi apparatus serves as a major MTOC in mammalian cells.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Mukherjee, A., Brooks, P. S., Bernard, F., Guichet, A. & Conduit, P. T. D. Microtubules originate asymmetrically at the somatic Golgi and are guided via Kinesin2 to maintain polarity within neurons. eLife 9, e58943 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Valenzuela, A., Meservey, L., Nguyen, H. & Fu, M. M. Golgi outposts nucleate microtubules in cells with specialized shapes. Trends Cell Biol. 30, 792–804 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Oddoux, S. et al. Microtubules that form the stationary lattice of muscle fibers are dynamic and nucleated at Golgi elements. J. Cell Biol. 203, 205–213 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Gimpel, P. et al. Nesprin-1α-dependent microtubule nucleation from the nuclear envelope via Akap450 is necessary for nuclear positioning in muscle cells. Curr. Biol. 27, 2999–3009 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Yalgin, C. et al. Centrosomin represses dendrite branching by orienting microtubule nucleation. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1437–1445 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ori-McKenney, K. M., Jan, L. Y. & Jan, Y. N. Golgi outposts shape dendrite morphology by functioning as sites of acentrosomal microtubule nucleation in neurons. Neuron 76, 921–930 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Yang, S. Z. & Wildonger, J. Golgi outposts locally regulate microtubule orientation in neurons but are not required for the overall polarity of the dendritic cytoskeleton. Genetics 215, 435–447 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Nguyen, M. M. et al. γ-Tubulin controls neuronal microtubule polarity independently of Golgi outposts. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 2039–2050 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Fu, M. M. et al. The Golgi outpost protein TPPP nucleates microtubules and is critical for myelination. Cell 179, 132–146 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Weiner, A. T. et al. Endosomal Wnt signaling proteins control microtubule nucleation in dendrites. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000647 (2020). This paper shows that Wnt signalling pathway components associated with endosomes participate in organizing microtubules in fly neurons.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Hehnly, H. & Doxsey, S. Rab11 endosomes contribute to mitotic spindle organization and orientation. Dev. Cell 28, 497–507 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Krishnan, N. et al. Rab11 endosomes coordinate centrosome number and movement following mitotic exit. biorRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.11.455966 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Chen, J. V., Buchwalter, R. A., Kao, L. R. & Megraw, T. L. A splice variant of centrosomin converts mitochondria to microtubule-organizing centers. Curr. Biol. 27, 1928–1940 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Vergarajauregui, S. et al. AKAP6 orchestrates the nuclear envelope microtubule-organizing center by linking Golgi and nucleus via AKAP9. eLife 9, e61669 (2020). This study represents a comprehensive analysis of the MTOC associated with the nuclear envelope in cardiomyocytes.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Harris, T. J. & Peifer, M. aPKC controls microtubule organization to balance adherens junction symmetry and planar polarity during development. Dev. Cell 12, 727–738 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Feldman, J. L. & Priess, J. R. A role for the centrosome and PAR-3 in the hand-off of MTOC function during epithelial polarization. Curr. Biol. 22, 575–582 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Sanchez, A. D. et al. Proximity labeling reveals non-centrosomal microtubule-organizing center components required for microtubule growth and localization. Curr. Biol. 31, 3586–3600 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Castiglioni, V. G. et al. Epidermal PAR-6 and PKC-3 are essential for larval development of C. elegans and organize non-centrosomal microtubules. eLife 9, e62067 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Toya, M. et al. CAMSAP3 orients the apical-to-basal polarity of microtubule arrays in epithelial cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 332–337 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Nashchekin, D., Fernandes, A. R. & St Johnston, D. Patronin/shot cortical foci assemble the noncentrosomal microtubule array that specifies the Drosophila anterior–posterior axis. Dev. Cell 38, 61–72 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Guerreiro, A. et al. WDR62 localizes katanin at spindle poles to ensure synchronous chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202007171 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Huang, J., Liang, Z., Guan, C., Hua, S. & Jiang, K. WDR62 regulates spindle dynamics as an adaptor protein between TPX2/Aurora A and katanin. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202007167 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Petry, S., Groen, A. C., Ishihara, K., Mitchison, T. J. & Vale, R. D. Branching microtubule nucleation in Xenopus egg extracts mediated by augmin and TPX2. Cell 152, 768–777 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Sanchez-Huertas, C. et al. Non-centrosomal nucleation mediated by augmin organizes microtubules in post-mitotic neurons and controls axonal microtubule polarity. Nat. Commun. 7, 12187 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Cunha-Ferreira, I. et al. The HAUS complex is a key regulator of non-centrosomal microtubule organization during neuronal development. Cell Rep. 24, 791–800 (2018). Together with ref. 80, this work demonstrates that branching microtubule nucleation has a role in the formation of microtubule arrays in different neuronal compartments.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Qu, X., Kumar, A., Blockus, H., Waites, C. & Bartolini, F. Activity-dependent nucleation of dynamic microtubules at presynaptic boutons controls neurotransmission. Curr. Biol. 29, 4231–4240 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Zenker, J. et al. A microtubule-organizing center directing intracellular transport in the early mouse embryo. Science 357, 925–928 (2017). This paper shows how the cytokinetic bridge is transformed into an MTOC during early mammalian development.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Labat-de-Hoz, L. et al. A model for primary cilium biogenesis by polarized epithelial cells: role of the midbody remnant and associated specialized membranes. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 622918 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Desai, A. & Mitchison, T. J. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 83–117 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Brouhard, G. J. & Rice, L. M. Microtubule dynamics: an interplay of biochemistry and mechanics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 451–463 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Gudimchuk, N. B. & McIntosh, J. R. Regulation of microtubule dynamics, mechanics and function through the growing tip. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 777–795 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Estevez-Gallego, J. et al. Structural model for differential cap maturation at growing microtubule ends. eLife 9, e50155 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Manka, S. W. & Moores, C. A. The role of tubulin–tubulin lattice contacts in the mechanism of microtubule dynamic instability. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 607–615 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. LaFrance, B. J. et al. Structural transitions in the GTP cap visualized by cryo-electron microscopy of catalytically inactive microtubules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119 (2022).

  91. Brouhard, G. J. et al. XMAP215 is a processive microtubule polymerase. Cell 132, 79–88 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Feng, C. et al. Patronin-mediated minus end growth is required for dendritic microtubule polarity. J. Cell Biol. 218, 2309–2328 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Akhmanova, A. & Steinmetz, M. O. Control of microtubule organization and dynamics: two ends in the limelight. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 711–726 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Bouchet, B. P. et al. Mesenchymal cell invasion requires cooperative regulation of persistent microtubule growth by SLAIN2 and CLASP1. Dev. Cell 39, 708–723 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Grigoriev, I. et al. STIM1 is a MT-plus-end-tracking protein involved in remodeling of the ER. Curr. Biol. 18, 177–182 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. van der Vaart, B. et al. CFEOM1-associated kinesin KIF21A is a cortical microtubule growth inhibitor. Dev. Cell 27, 145–160 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Homma, N. et al. Kinesin superfamily protein 2A (KIF2A) functions in suppression of collateral branch extension. Cell 114, 229–239 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Maor-Nof, M. et al. Axonal pruning is actively regulated by the microtubule-destabilizing protein kinesin superfamily protein 2A. Cell Rep. 3, 971–977 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Jaworski, J. et al. Dynamic microtubules regulate dendritic spine morphology and synaptic plasticity. Neuron 61, 85–100 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Straube, A. & Merdes, A. EB3 regulates microtubule dynamics at the cell cortex and is required for myoblast elongation and fusion. Curr. Biol. 17, 1318–1325 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Hooikaas, P. J. et al. Kinesin-4 KIF21B limits microtubule growth to allow rapid centrosome polarization in T cells. eLife 9, e62876 (2020). This paper shows that keeping microtubule arrays sparse can be important for rapid microtubule reorganization in immune cells.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Muhia, M. et al. The Kinesin KIF21B regulates microtubule dynamics and is essential for neuronal morphology, synapse function, and learning and memory. Cell Rep. 15, 968–977 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Bearce, E. A., Erdogan, B. & Lowery, L. A. TIPsy tour guides: how microtubule plus-end tracking proteins (+TIPs) facilitate axon guidance. Front. Cell Neurosci. 9, 241 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Baas, P. W., Rao, A. N., Matamoros, A. J. & Leo, L. Stability properties of neuronal microtubules. Cytoskeleton 73, 442–460 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Cuveillier, C. et al. MAP6 is an intraluminal protein that induces neuronal microtubules to coil. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz4344 (2020). This study demonstrates that the protein responsible for strong stabilization of neuronal microtubules localizes to microtubule lumen and induces their deformation.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Bodakuntla, S., Jijumon, A. S., Villablanca, C., Gonzalez-Billault, C. & Janke, C. Microtubule-associated proteins: structuring the cytoskeleton. Trends Cell Biol. 29, 804–819 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Freal, A. et al. Feedback-driven assembly of the axon initial segment. Neuron 104, 305–321 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Feng, C. et al. Trim9 and Klp61F promote polymerization of new dendritic microtubules along parallel microtubules. J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs258437 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Janson, M. E., de Dood, M. E. & Dogterom, M. Dynamic instability of microtubules is regulated by force. J. Cell Biol. 161, 1029–1034 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Xu, Z. et al. Microtubules acquire resistance from mechanical breakage through intralumenal acetylation. Science 356, 328–332 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Thery, M. & Blanchoin, L. Microtubule self-repair. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 68, 144–154 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Schaedel, L. et al. Microtubules self-repair in response to mechanical stress. Nat. Mater. 14, 1156–1163 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Vemu, A. et al. Severing enzymes amplify microtubule arrays through lattice GTP-tubulin incorporation. Science 361, eaau1504 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Triclin, S. et al. Self-repair protects microtubules from destruction by molecular motors. Nat. Mater. 20, 883–891 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Andreu-Carbo, M., Fernandes, S., Velluz, M. C., Kruse, K. & Aumeier, C. Motor usage imprints microtubule stability along the shaft. Dev. Cell 57, 5–18 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Dimitrov, A. et al. Detection of GTP-tubulin conformation in vivo reveals a role for GTP remnants in microtubule rescues. Science 322, 1353–1356 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. de Forges, H. et al. Localized mechanical stress promotes microtubule rescue. Curr. Biol. 26, 3399–3406 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Shima, T. et al. Kinesin-binding-triggered conformation switching of microtubules contributes to polarized transport. J. Cell Biol. 217, 4164–4183 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Peet, D. R., Burroughs, N. J. & Cross, R. A. Kinesin expands and stabilizes the GDP-microtubule lattice. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 386–391 (2018). Together with Shima et al. (2018), this work convincingly demonstrates that kinesin 1 can cause expansion of the microtubule lattice.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. He, L. et al. Cortical anchoring of the microtubule cytoskeleton is essential for neuron polarity. eLife 9, e55111 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Dogterom, M. & Koenderink, G. H. Actin–microtubule crosstalk in cell biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 38–54 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Noordstra, I. & Akhmanova, A. Linking cortical microtubule attachment and exocytosis. F1000Res 6, 469 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Basu, S. et al. CLASP2-dependent microtubule capture at the neuromuscular junction membrane requires LL5β and actin for focal delivery of acetylcholine receptor vesicles. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 938–951 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Rahimov, F. & Kunkel, L. M. The cell biology of disease: cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying muscular dystrophy. J. Cell Biol. 201, 499–510 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Nelson, D. M. et al. Variable rescue of microtubule and physiological phenotypes in mdx muscle expressing different miniaturized dystrophins. Hum. Mol. Genet. 27, 2090–2100 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Gawor, M. & Proszynski, T. J. The molecular cross talk of the dystrophin–glycoprotein complex. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1412, 62–72 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Ayalon, G., Davis, J. Q., Scotland, P. B. & Bennett, V. An ankyrin-based mechanism for functional organization of dystrophin and dystroglycan. Cell 135, 1189–1200 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Leterrier, C. et al. End-binding proteins EB3 and EB1 link microtubules to ankyrin G in the axon initial segment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8826–8831 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Shaw, R. M. et al. Microtubule plus-end-tracking proteins target gap junctions directly from the cell interior to adherens junctions. Cell 128, 547–560 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Roll-Mecak, A. The tubulin code in microtubule dynamics and information encoding. Dev. Cell 54, 7–20 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Janke, C. & Magiera, M. M. The tubulin code and its role in controlling microtubule properties and functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 307–326 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Katrukha, E. A., Jurriens, D., Salas Pastene, D. M. & Kapitein, L. C. Quantitative mapping of dense microtubule arrays in mammalian neurons. eLife 10, e67925 (2021). This paper uses stimulated emission depletion and expansion microscopy to measure the distribution and relative abundance of different microtubule subsets in dendrites.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Peris, L. et al. Motor-dependent microtubule disassembly driven by tubulin tyrosination. J. Cell Biol. 185, 1159–1166 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Valenstein, M. L. & Roll-Mecak, A. Graded control of microtubule severing by tubulin glutamylation. Cell 164, 911–921 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Cai, D., McEwen, D. P., Martens, J. R., Meyhofer, E. & Verhey, K. J. Single molecule imaging reveals differences in microtubule track selection between Kinesin motors. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000216 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Guardia, C. M., Farias, G. G., Jia, R., Pu, J. & Bonifacino, J. S. BORC functions upstream of Kinesins 1 and 3 to coordinate regional movement of lysosomes along different microtubule tracks. Cell Rep. 17, 1950–1961 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Tas, R. P. et al. Differentiation between oppositely oriented microtubules controls polarized neuronal transport. Neuron 96, 1264–1271 (2017). This paper introduces Motor-PAINT and demonstrates that different microtubule subsets have different orientations within dendrites.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Sirajuddin, M., Rice, L. M. & Vale, R. D. Regulation of microtubule motors by tubulin isotypes and post-translational modifications. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 335–344 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Monroy, B. Y. et al. A combinatorial MAP code dictates polarized microtubule transport. Dev. Cell 53, 60–72 (2020). This paper dissects the effects of an array of neuronal MAPs on the motility of several types of transporting kinesins.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Magiera, M. M., Singh, P., Gadadhar, S. & Janke, C. Tubulin posttranslational modifications and emerging links to human disease. Cell 173, 1323–1327 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Magiera, M. M. et al. Excessive tubulin polyglutamylation causes neurodegeneration and perturbs neuronal transport. EMBO J. 37, e100440 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Shashi, V. et al. Loss of tubulin deglutamylase CCP1 causes infantile-onset neurodegeneration. EMBO J. 37, e100540 (2018). Together with Magiera et al. (EMBO J, 2018), this work provides one of the best examples of how misregulation of microtubule post-translational modifications can lead to human disease.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Bodakuntla, S. et al. Tubulin polyglutamylation is a general traffic-control mechanism in hippocampal neurons. J. Cell Sci. 133, jcs241802 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Bodakuntla, S. et al. Distinct roles of α- and β-tubulin polyglutamylation in controlling axonal transport and in neurodegeneration. EMBO J. 40, e108498 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Gadadhar, S. et al. Tubulin glycylation controls axonemal dynein activity, flagellar beat, and male fertility. Science 371, eabd4914 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Lechler, T. & Mapelli, M. Spindle positioning and its impact on vertebrate tissue architecture and cell fate. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 691–708 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Jimenez, A. J. et al. Acto-myosin network geometry defines centrosome position. Curr. Biol. 31, 1206–1220 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Yi, J. et al. Centrosome repositioning in T cells is biphasic and driven by microtubule end-on capture-shrinkage. J. Cell Biol. 202, 779–792 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Zheng, Y. et al. Dynein is required for polarized dendritic transport and uniform microtubule orientation in axons. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1172–1180 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. del Castillo, U., Winding, M., Lu, W. & Gelfand, V. I. Interplay between kinesin-1 and cortical dynein during axonal outgrowth and microtubule organization in Drosophila neurons. eLife 4, e10140 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Del Castillo, U., Muller, H. J. & Gelfand, V. I. Kinetochore protein Spindly controls microtubule polarity in Drosophila axons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 12155–12163 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Lu, W. & Gelfand, V. I. Moonlighting motors: kinesin, dynein, and cell polarity. Trends Cell Biol. 27, 505–514 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Palacios, I. M. & St Johnston, D. Kinesin light chain-independent function of the Kinesin heavy chain in cytoplasmic streaming and posterior localisation in the Drosophila oocyte. Development 129, 5473–5485 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Lu, W., Fox, P., Lakonishok, M., Davidson, M. W. & Gelfand, V. I. Initial neurite outgrowth in Drosophila neurons is driven by kinesin-powered microtubule sliding. Curr. Biol. 23, 1018–1023 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Mattie, F. J. et al. Directed microtubule growth, +TIPs, and kinesin-2 are required for uniform microtubule polarity in dendrites. Curr. Biol. 20, 2169–2177 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Schatzle, P. et al. Activity-dependent actin remodeling at the base of dendritic spines promotes microtubule entry. Curr. Biol. 28, 2081–2093 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Merriam, E. B. et al. Synaptic regulation of microtubule dynamics in dendritic spines by calcium, F-actin, and drebrin. J. Neurosci. 33, 16471–16482 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Slater, P. G. et al. XMAP215 promotes microtubule-F-actin interactions to regulate growth cone microtubules during axon guidance in Xenopus laevis. J. Cell Sci. 132, jcs224311 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Sanchez-Huertas, C. et al. The +TIP Navigator-1 is an actin-microtubule crosslinker that regulates axonal growth cone motility. J. Cell Biol. 219, e201905199 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Kundu, T., Dutta, P., Nagar, D., Maiti, S. & Ghose, A. Coupling of dynamic microtubules to F-actin by Fmn2 regulates chemotaxis of neuronal growth cones. J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs252916 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Burute, M. & Kapitein, L. C. Cellular logistics: unraveling the interplay between microtubule organization and intracellular transport. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 35, 29–54 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Douanne, T. & Griffiths, G. M. Cytoskeletal control of the secretory immune synapse. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 71, 87–94 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Kopf, A. et al. Microtubules control cellular shape and coherence in amoeboid migrating cells. J. Cell Biol. 219, e201907154 (2020). This study provides convincing support for the concept that one of the functions of the microtubule network is to preserve the integrity of highly branched cells during cell migration in complex environments.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. Vertii, A. et al. The centrosome undergoes Plk1-independent interphase maturation during inflammation and mediates cytokine release. Dev. Cell 37, 377–386 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Etienne-Manneville, S. Microtubules in cell migration. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 29, 471–499 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Martin, M., Veloso, A., Wu, J., Katrukha, E. A. & Akhmanova, A. Control of endothelial cell polarity and sprouting angiogenesis by non-centrosomal microtubules. eLife 7, e 33864 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Pasquier, E., André, N. & Braguer, D. Targeting microtubules to inhibit angiogenesis and disrupt tumour vasculature: implications for cancer treatment. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 7, 566–581 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Blasky, A. J., Mangan, A. & Prekeris, R. Polarized protein transport and lumen formation during epithelial tissue morphogenesis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 31, 575–591 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. Booth, A. J. R., Blanchard, G. B., Adams, R. J. & Roper, K. A dynamic microtubule cytoskeleton directs medial actomyosin function during tube formation. Dev. Cell 29, 562–576 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Henderson, D. J., Long, D. A. & Dean, C. H. Planar cell polarity in organ formation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 55, 96–103 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Matis, M., Russler-Germain, D. A., Hu, Q., Tomlin, C. J. & Axelrod, J. D. Microtubules provide directional information for core PCP function. eLife 3, e02893 (2014). This paper combines experiments with modelling to demonstrate the interplay between planar cell polarity signalling and the apical microtubule cytoskeleton.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. Shimada, Y., Yonemura, S., Ohkura, H., Strutt, D. & Uemura, T. Polarized transport of Frizzled along the planar microtubule arrays in Drosophila wing epithelium. Dev. Cell 10, 209–222 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Kimura, T., Saito, H., Kawasaki, M. & Takeichi, M. CAMSAP3 is required for mTORC1-dependent ependymal cell growth and lateral ventricle shaping in mouse brains. Development 148, dev195073 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Herawati, E. et al. Multiciliated cell basal bodies align in stereotypical patterns coordinated by the apical cytoskeleton. J. Cell Biol. 214, 571–586 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  175. Oddoux, S. et al. Misplaced Golgi elements produce randomly oriented microtubules and aberrant cortical arrays of microtubules in dystrophic skeletal muscle fibers. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 7, 176 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Robison, P. et al. Detyrosinated microtubules buckle and bear load in contracting cardiomyocytes. Science 352, aaf0659 (2016). This paper demonstrates that specific interactions between microtubules and intermediate filaments contribute to the mechanics of heart cell contraction.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  177. Salomon, A. K. et al. Desmin intermediate filaments and tubulin detyrosination stabilize growing microtubules in the cardiomyocyte. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.26.445641 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Yu, X. et al. MARK4 controls ischaemic heart failure through microtubule detyrosination. Nature 594, 560–565 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  179. Zile, M. R. et al. Cardiocyte cytoskeleton in patients with left ventricular pressure overload hypertrophy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 37, 1080–1084 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Chen, C. Y. et al. Suppression of detyrosinated microtubules improves cardiomyocyte function in human heart failure. Nat. Med. 24, 1225–1233 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Aiken, J. & Holzbaur, E. L. F. Cytoskeletal regulation guides neuronal trafficking to effectively supply the synapse. Curr. Biol. 31, R633–R650 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  182. Koppers, M. & Farias, G. G. Organelle distribution in neurons: logistics behind polarized transport. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 71, 46–54 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Baas, P. W. Microtubules and neuronal polarity: lessons from mitosis. Neuron 22, 23–31 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Hertzler, J. I. et al. Kinetochore proteins suppress neuronal microtubule dynamics and promote dendrite regeneration. Mol. Biol. Cell 31, 2125–2138 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  185. Cheerambathur, D. K. et al. The kinetochore–microtubule coupling machinery is repurposed in sensory nervous system morphogenesis. Dev. Cell 48, 864–872 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  186. Zhao, G., Oztan, A., Ye, Y. & Schwarz, T. L. Kinetochore proteins have a post-mitotic function in neurodevelopment. Dev. Cell 48, 873–882 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  187. Guedes-Dias, P. & Holzbaur, E. L. F. Axonal transport: driving synaptic function. Science 366, eaaw9997 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  188. Yogev, S., Cooper, R., Fetter, R., Horowitz, M. & Shen, K. Microtubule organization determines axonal transport dynamics. Neuron 92, 449–460 (2016). This paper carefully analyses the number and length of microtubules in worm axons and shows that cargoes frequently pause at microtubule ends.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  189. Guedes-Dias, P. et al. Kinesin-3 responds to local microtubule dynamics to target synaptic cargo delivery to the presynapse. Curr. Biol. 29, 268–282 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  190. Nirschl, J. J., Magiera, M. M., Lazarus, J. E., Janke, C. & Holzbaur, E. L. α-Tubulin tyrosination and CLIP-170 phosphorylation regulate the initiation of dynein-driven transport in neurons. Cell Rep. 14, 2637–2652 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  191. Moughamian, A. J., Osborn, G. E., Lazarus, J. E., Maday, S. & Holzbaur, E. L. Ordered recruitment of dynactin to the microtubule plus-end is required for efficient initiation of retrograde axonal transport. J. Neurosci. 33, 13190–13203 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  192. Stone, M. C., Roegiers, F. & Rolls, M. M. Microtubules have opposite orientation in axons and dendrites of Drosophila neurons. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 4122–4129 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  193. Goodwin, P. R., Sasaki, J. M. & Juo, P. Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 regulates the polarized trafficking of neuropeptide-containing dense-core vesicles in Caenorhabditis elegans motor neurons. J. Neurosci. 32, 8158–8172 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. Harterink, M. et al. Light-controlled intracellular transport in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 26, R153–R154 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. Baas, P. W., Deitch, J. S., Black, M. M. & Banker, G. A. Polarity orientation of microtubules in hippocampal neurons: uniformity in the axon and nonuniformity in the dendrite. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 8335–8339 (1988). This paper demonstrates that the microtubule array in dendrites from cultured neurons has mixed polarity.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  196. Yau, K. W. et al. Dendrites in vitro and in vivo contain microtubules of opposite polarity and axon formation correlates with uniform plus-end-out microtubule orientation. J. Neurosci. 36, 1071–1085 (2016). This paper demonstrates mixed polarity of the microtubule arrays in dendrites in brain tissue and uses laser-based microsurgery to quantify them.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  197. Ayloo, S., Guedes-Dias, P., Ghiretti, A. E. & Holzbaur, E. L. F. Dynein efficiently navigates the dendritic cytoskeleton to drive the retrograde trafficking of BDNF/TrkB signaling endosomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 2543–2554 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  198. Kapitein, L. C. et al. Mixed microtubules steer dynein-driven cargo transport into dendrites. Curr. Biol. 20, 290–299 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. van Beuningen, S. F. B. et al. TRIM46 controls neuronal polarity and axon specification by driving the formation of parallel microtubule arrays. Neuron 88, 1208–1226 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  200. Rao, A. N. et al. Cytoplasmic dynein transports axonal microtubules in a polarity-sorting manner. Cell Rep. 19, 2210–2219 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  201. Muralidharan, H. & Baas, P. W. Mitotic motor KIFC1 is an organizer of microtubules in the axon. J. Neurosci. 39, 3792–3811 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  202. Yau, K. W. et al. Microtubule minus-end binding protein CAMSAP2 controls axon specification and dendrite development. Neuron 82, 1058–1073 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  203. Cao, Y. et al. Microtubule minus-end binding protein CAMSAP2 and Kinesin-14 motor KIFC3 control dendritic microtubule organization. Curr. Biol. 30, 899–908 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  204. Boiarska, Z. & Passarella, D. Microtubule-targeting agents and neurodegeneration. Drug Discov. Today 26, 604–615 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  205. Consolati, T. et al. Microtubule nucleation properties of single human γTuRCs explained by their cryo-EM structure. Dev. Cell 53, 603–617 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  206. Liu, P. et al. Insights into the assembly and activation of the microtubule nucleator γ-TuRC. Nature 578, 467–471 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  207. Wieczorek, M. et al. Asymmetric molecular architecture of the human γ-tubulin ring complex. Cell 180, 165–175 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. Kuo, Y. W., Trottier, O., Mahamdeh, M. & Howard, J. Spastin is a dual-function enzyme that severs microtubules and promotes their regrowth to increase the number and mass of microtubules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5533–5541 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  209. Kuo, Y. W. & Howard, J. Cutting, amplifying, and aligning microtubules with severing enzymes. Trends Cell Biol. 31, 50–61 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  210. Jiang, K. et al. Microtubule minus-end regulation at spindle poles by an ASPM–katanin complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 480–492 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  211. Chakraborty, S., Mahamid, J. & Baumeister, W. Cryoelectron tomography reveals nanoscale organization of the cytoskeleton and its relation to microtubule curvature inside cells. Structure 28, 991–1003 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  212. Muller, A. et al. 3D FIB-SEM reconstruction of microtubule–organelle interaction in whole primary mouse β cells. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202010039 (2021). This study uses electron microscopy to visualize the complete microtubule cytoskeleton and membrane organelles in entire β cells.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  213. Liu, S., Hoess, P. & Ries, J. Super-resolution microscopy for structural cell biology. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 51, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-102521-112912 (2022).

  214. Chen, F., Tillberg, P. W. & Boyden, E. S. Optical imaging. Expansion microscopy. Science 347, 543–548 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  215. Gros, O. J., Damstra, H. G. J., Kapitein, L. C., Akhmanova, A. & Berger, F. Dynein self-organizes while translocating the centrosome in T-cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 32, 855–868 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  216. Damstra, H. G. J. et al. Visualizing cellular and tissue ultrastructure using ten-fold robust expansion microscopy (TREx). eLife 11, e73775 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anna Akhmanova or Lukas C. Kapitein.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology thanks Torsten Wittmann, who co-reviewed with Alessandro Dema, Jawdat Al-Bassam and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Glossary

Centrosome

A non-membranous organelle which consists of two centrioles surrounded by a proteinaceous matrix that nucleates and anchors microtubules.

Axon

A neuronal compartment that transmits signals.

Dendrites

Neuronal compartments that receive signals.

Centrioles

Cylindrical structures with a core of nine microtubule triplets. A centrosome contains two orthogonally arranged centrioles, the mother and the daughter centriole. A mother centriole is assembled one cell cycle earlier than the daughter centriole.

Condensates

Membraneless structures which can form by the physical process of liquid–liquid phase separation, whereby a well-mixed solution of macromolecules such as proteins or nucleic acids spontaneously separates into two phases, a dense phase and a dilute phase.

Axoneme

A microtubule-based cytoskeletal structure that forms the core of a cilium or a flagellum; it contains nine microtubule doublets, and in motile cilia also a central pair of microtubules

End binding proteins

(EBs). Conserved proteins that specifically bind to growing microtubule ends because they preferentially associate with the microtubule lattice in which β-tubulin is bound to GTP.

Dendritic arborization neurons

Neurons of a larval sensory type in Drosophila with specific dendritic morphologies.

Radial glial cells

Progenitor cells responsible for producing neurons of the cerebral cortex.

Oligodendrocytes

Myelinating glia cells of the central nervous system.

Growth cone

An actin-supported extension of a developing or regenerating axon or dendrite.

Fat body

An insect organ distributed throughout the body that has an essential role in energy storage and utilization.

Adherens junctions

Protein assemblies at cell–cell junctions in epithelial and endothelial cells; they contain transmembrane proteins called cadherins and are linked to the actin cytoskeleton.

Desmosomes

Adhesive protein complexes localized to intercellular junctions, responsible for maintaining the mechanical integrity of tissues.

Presynaptic boutons

Neurotransmitter-producing knoblike enlargements at the end of an axon involved in forming a synapse with another neuron.

Immunological synapse

The interface between an antigen-presenting cell or a target cell and a lymphocyte, such as a B cell or T cell, or a natural killer cell.

Catastrophes

Abrupt transitions from microtubule growth to shortening associated with loss of a GTP cap; they can occur spontaneously or be triggered by obstacles to microtubule growth or different cellular factors.

Rescues

Abrupt transitions from microtubule shortening to growth associated with regaining a GTP cap; these events are thought to be induced by cellular factors.

Axon initial segment

A plasma membrane-associated compartment at the base of an axon, which generates and shapes the action potential.

Focal adhesions

Integrin-containing multi-protein assemblies that establish mechanical links between intracellular actin bundles and the extracellular matrix.

Z-discs

Fine dense lines forming sarcomere boundaries, which stabilize actin filaments and allow force transmission between sarcomeres.

Sarcomeres

Basic contractile units of a muscle fibre; they contain actin and myosin filaments.

Gap junction

A channel that physically connects adjacent cells, mediating rapid exchange of small molecules.

Cytoplasmic streaming

Intracellular movement of the fluid substance (cytoplasm), transporting nutrients, macromolecules and organelles.

Dendritic spines

Membranous protrusions from a neuronal dendrite that receive input from an axon at the synapse.

Dendritic cells

Antigen-presenting cells that form an important role in the adaptive immune system.

mTORC1

(Mammalian (or mechanistic) target of rapamycin complex 1). A protein complex that functions as a nutrient, energy and redox sensor and controls protein synthesis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akhmanova, A., Kapitein, L.C. Mechanisms of microtubule organization in differentiated animal cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 23, 541–558 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00473-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00473-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing