This Genome Watch highlights new computational approaches aimed at circumventing contamination in low-biomass microbiome studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Kennedy, K. M. et al. Questioning the fetal microbiome illustrates pitfalls of low-biomass microbial studies. Nature 613, 639–649 (2023).
Tan, C. C. S. et al. No evidence for a common blood microbiome based on a population study of 9,770 healthy humans. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 973–985 (2023).
Salter, S. J. et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 12, 87 (2014).
Davis, N. M. et al. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome 6, 226 (2018).
Austin, G. I. et al. Contamination source modeling with SCRuB improves cancer phenotype prediction from microbiome data. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01696-w (2023).
About this article
Cite this article
Shao, Y. Scrubbing contaminated microbiomes. Nat Rev Microbiol 21, 554 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-023-00941-y