Bacteria have developed a large array of motility mechanisms to exploit available resources and environments. These mechanisms can be broadly classified into swimming in aqueous media and movement over solid surfaces. Swimming motility involves either the rotation of rigid helical filaments through the external medium or gyration of the cell body in response to the rotation of internal filaments. On surfaces, bacteria swarm collectively in a thin layer of fluid powered by the rotation of rigid helical filaments, they twitch by assembling and disassembling type IV pili, they glide by driving adhesins along tracks fixed to the cell surface and, finally, non-motile cells slide over surfaces in response to outward forces due to colony growth. Recent technological advances, especially in cryo-electron microscopy, have greatly improved our knowledge of the molecular machinery that powers the various forms of bacterial motility. In this Review, we describe the current understanding of the physical and molecular mechanisms that allow bacteria to move around.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Dobell, C. Antony van Leeuwenhoek and His “Little Animals” (Russell & Russell, 1958).
Miyata, M. et al. Tree of motility – a proposed history of motility systems in the tree of life. Genes Cell 25, 6–21 (2020). This review provides a detailed overview of the various forms of motility found across the tree of life.
Dick, G. J. The microbiomes of deep-sea hydrothermal vents: distributed globally, shaped locally. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 271–283 (2019).
Raina, J. B., Fernandez, V., Lambert, B., Stocker, R. & Seymour, J. R. The role of microbial motility and chemotaxis in symbiosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 284–294 (2019).
Jarrell, K. F. & McBride, M. J. The surprisingly diverse ways that prokaryotes move. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 466–476 (2008).
Henrichsen, J. Bacterial surface translocation: a survey and a classification. Bacteriol. Rev. 36, 478–503 (1972).
Purcell, E. M. Life at low Reynolds number. Am. J. Phys. 45, 3–11 (1977). A classic article that gives a highly accessible introduction to the flow physics of motility at low Reynolds number.
Santiveri, M. et al. Structure and function of stator units of the bacterial flagellar motor. Cell 183, 244–257.e16 (2020).
Deme, J. C. et al. Structures of the stator complex that drives rotation of the bacterial flagellum. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 1553–1564 (2020). Together with Santiveri et al. (2020) provide atomic resolution structures for the stator unit of the flagellar motor and a proposal for a novel rotation model for torque generation.
Tan, J. et al. Structural basis of assembly and torque transmission of the bacterial flagellar motor. Cell 184, 2665–2679.e19 (2021).
Johnson, S. et al. Molecular structure of the intact bacterial flagellar basal body. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 712–721 (2021). Together with Tan et al. (2021), this article provides the cryo-EM structure of the bacterial flagellar motor basal body.
Chang, Y. W. et al. Architecture of the type IVa pilus machine. Science 351, aad2001 (2016).
Gold, V. A., Salzer, R., Averhoff, B. & Kuhlbrandt, W. Structure of a type IV pilus machinery in the open and closed state. eLife 4, e07380 (2015). Together with Chang et al. (2016), this article describes the use of cryo-electron tomography to determine the architecture of the type IV pilus machine.
Hennell James, R. et al. Structure and mechanism of the proton-driven motor that powers type 9 secretion and gliding motility. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 221–233 (2021). This study presents cryo-EM structures of the motor complexes that power gliding motility and type IX protein secretion in Bacteroidetes.
Berg, H. C. & Anderson, R. A. Bacteria swim by rotating their flagellar filaments. Nature 245, 380–382 (1973).
Silverman, M. & Simon, M. Flagellar rotation and the mechanism of bacterial motility. Nature 249, 73–74 (1974). Together with Berg & Anderson (1974), the authors provide evidence that bacterial flagella rotate rigidly rather than wave or beat.
Nakamura, S. & Minamino, T. Flagella-driven motility of bacteria. Biomolecules 9, 279 (2019).
Yonekura, K., Maki-Yonekura, S. & Namba, K. Complete atomic model of the bacterial flagellar filament by electron cryomicroscopy. Nature 424, 643–650 (2003).
Macnab, R. M. Examination of bacterial flagellation by dark-field microscopy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 4, 258–265 (1976).
Hotani, H. Micro-video study of moving bacterial flagellar filaments. III. Cyclic transformation induced by mechanical force. J. Mol. Biol. 156, 791–806 (1982).
Turner, L., Ryu, W. S. & Berg, H. C. Real-time imaging of fluorescent flagellar filaments. J. Bacteriol. 182, 2793–2801 (2000). This pioneering work enabled fluorescent labelling and high-speed imaging of flagellar filaments in vivo.
Turner, L. & Berg, H. C. Labeling bacterial flagella with fluorescent dyes. Methods Mol. Biol. 1729, 71–76 (2018).
Schuhmacher, J. S., Thormann, K. M. & Bange, G. How bacteria maintain location and number of flagella? FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 812–822 (2015).
Guttenplan, S. B., Shaw, S. & Kearns, D. B. The cell biology of peritrichous flagella in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 87, 211–229 (2013).
Echazarreta, M. A. & Klose, K. E. Vibrio flagellar synthesis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 9, 131 (2019).
Swan, M. A. Electron microscopic observations of structures associated with the flagella of Spirillum volutans. J. Bacteriol. 161, 1137–1145 (1985).
Armitage, J. P. & Macnab, R. M. Unidirectional, intermittent rotation of the flagellum of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Bacteriol. 169, 514–518 (1987).
Haya, S., Tokumaru, Y., Abe, N., Kaneko, J. & Aizawa, S. Characterization of lateral flagella of Selenomonas ruminantium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 2799–2802 (2011).
Berg, H. C. E. coli in Motion (Springer, 2003).
Darnton, N. C., Turner, L., Rojevsky, S. & Berg, H. C. On torque and tumbling in swimming Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 189, 1756–1764 (2007).
Berg, H. C. & Brown, D. A. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature 239, 500–504 (1972). This study characterizes the run-and-tumble strategy used by E. coli to navigate spatial gradients of chemical attractants.
Larsen, S. H., Reader, R. W., Kort, E. N., Tso, W. W. & Adler, J. Change in direction of flagellar rotation is the basis of the chemotactic response in Escherichia coli. Nature 249, 74–77 (1974).
Xie, L., Altindal, T., Chattopadhyay, S. & Wu, X.-L. Bacterial flagellum as a propeller and as a rudder for efficient chemotaxis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2246–2251 (2011).
Son, K., Guasto, J. S. & Stocker, R. Bacteria can exploit a flagellar buckling instability to change direction. Nat. Phys. 9, 494–498 (2013).
Attmannspacher, U., Scharf, B. & Schmitt, R. Control of speed modulation (chemokinesis) in the unidirectional rotary motor of Sinorhizobium meliloti. Mol. Microbiol. 56, 708–718 (2005).
Wadhams, G. H. & Armitage, J. P. Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 1024–1037 (2004).
Hazelbauer, G. L., Falke, J. J. & Parkinson, J. S. Bacterial chemoreceptors: high-performance signaling in networked arrays. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 9–19 (2008).
Bi, S. & Sourjik, V. Stimulus sensing and signal processing in bacterial chemotaxis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 45, 22–29 (2018).
Brown, D. A. & Berg, H. C. Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 1388–1392 (1974).
Berg, H. C. The rotary motor of bacterial flagella. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72, 19–54 (2003).
Sowa, Y. & Berry, R. M. Bacterial flagellar motor. Q. Rev. Biophys. 41, 103–132 (2008).
Chevance, F. F. & Hughes, K. T. Coordinating assembly of a bacterial macromolecular machine. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 455–465 (2008).
Yamaguchi, T. et al. Structure of the molecular bushing of the bacterial flagellar motor. Nat. Commun. 12, 4469 (2021).
Hosu, B. G., Nathan, V. S. & Berg, H. C. Internal and external components of the bacterial flagellar motor rotate as a unit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4783–4787 (2016).
Halte, M. & Erhardt, M. Protein export via the type III secretion system of the bacterial flagellum. Biomolecules 11, 186 (2021).
Reid, S. W. et al. The maximum number of torque-generating units in the flagellar motor of Escherichia coli is at least 11. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8066–8071 (2006).
Hu, H. et al. Structural basis of torque generation in the bi-directional bacterial flagellar motor. Trends Biochem. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2021.06.005 (2021). This article summarizes recent progress in understanding the structure and function of the stator unit, as well as torque generation and rotational switching in the flagellar motor.
Manson, M. D., Tedesco, P., Berg, H. C., Harold, F. M. & Van der Drift, C. A protonmotive force drives bacterial flagella. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74, 3060–3064 (1977).
Al-Otaibi, N. S. & Bergeron, J. R. C. A new spin on flagellar rotation. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 1455–1456 (2020).
Chang, Y. et al. Molecular mechanism for rotational switching of the bacterial flagellar motor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 1041–1047 (2020). This article describes the use of cryo-electron tomography to reveal the architecture of the flagellar motor in counterclockwise and clockwise conformations, revealing the molecular mechanism underlying rotational switching.
Tusk, S. E., Delalez, N. J. & Berry, R. M. Subunit exchange in protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 4557–4579 (2018).
Yuan, J., Branch, R. W., Hosu, B. G. & Berg, H. C. Adaptation at the output of the chemotaxis signalling pathway. Nature 484, 233–236 (2012).
Lele, P. P., Branch, R. W., Nathan, V. S. & Berg, H. C. Mechanism for adaptive remodeling of the bacterial flagellar switch. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20018–20022 (2012).
Leake, M. C. et al. Stoichiometry and turnover in single, functioning membrane protein complexes. Nature 443, 355–358 (2006).
Lele, P. P., Hosu, B. G. & Berg, H. C. Dynamics of mechanosensing in the bacterial flagellar motor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11839–11844 (2013).
Tipping, M. J., Delalez, N. J., Lim, R., Berry, R. M. & Armitage, J. P. Load-dependent assembly of the bacterial flagellar motor. mBio 4, e00551-13 (2013).
Wadhwa, N., Phillips, R. & Berg, H. C. Torque-dependent remodeling of the bacterial flagellar motor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11764–11769 (2019).
Nord, A. L. et al. Catch bond drives stator mechanosensitivity in the bacterial flagellar motor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 12952–12957 (2017).
Terahara, N. et al. Load- and polysaccharide-dependent activation of the Na+-type MotPS stator in the Bacillus subtilis flagellar motor. Sci. Rep. 7, 46081 (2017).
Chawla, R., Ford, K. M. & Lele, P. P. Torque, but not FliL, regulates mechanosensitive flagellar motor-function. Sci. Rep. 7, 5565 (2017).
Nirody, J. A., Nord, A. L. & Berry, R. M. Load-dependent adaptation near zero load in the bacterial flagellar motor. J. R. Soc. Interface 16, 20190300 (2019).
Wadhwa, N., Tu, Y. & Berg, H. C. Mechanosensitive remodeling of the bacterial flagellar motor is independent of direction of rotation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2024608118 (2021).
Krieg, N. R. Biology of the chemoheterotrophic spirilla. Bacteriol. Rev. 40, 55–115 (1976).
Metzner, P. Die Bewegung und Reizbeantwortung der bipolar begeißelten Spirillen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 59, 325–412 (1920).
Krieg, N. R., Tomelty, J. P. & Wells, J. S. Jr. Inhibition of flagellar coordination in Spirillum volutans. J. Bacteriol. 94, 1431–1436 (1967).
Chwang, A. T., Wu, T. Y. & Winet, H. Locomotion of spirilla. Biophys. J. 12, 1549–1561 (1972).
Winet, H. & Keller, S. R. Spirillum swimming: theory and observations of propulsion by the flagellar bundle. J. Exp. Biol. 65, 577–602 (1976).
Ramia, M. Numerical model for the locomotion of spirilla. Biophys. J. 60, 1057–1078 (1991).
Berg, H. C. Chemotaxis in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 4, 119–136 (1975).
Cohen, E. J. et al. Campylobacter jejuni motility integrates specialized cell shape, flagellar filament, and motor, to coordinate action of its opposed flagella. PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008620 (2020).
Wolgemuth, C. W., Charon, N. W., Goldstein, S. F. & Goldstein, R. E. The flagellar cytoskeleton of the spirochetes. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 11, 221–227 (2006).
Picardeau, M. Virulence of the zoonotic agent of leptospirosis: still terra incognita? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 297–307 (2017).
Berg, H. C. How spirochetes may swim. J. Theor. Biol. 56, 269–273 (1976).
Nakamura, S. Spirochete flagella and motility. Biomolecules 10, 550 (2020). This review provides an excellent summary of the current understanding of spirochaete motility.
Murphy, G. E., Matson, E. G., Leadbetter, J. R., Berg, H. C. & Jensen, G. J. Novel ultrastructures of Treponema primitia and their implications for motility. Mol. Microbiol. 67, 1184–1195 (2008).
Berg, H., Bromley, D. & Charon, N. Leptospiral motility. Symp. Soc. Gen. Microbiol. 28, 285–294 (1978).
Goldstein, S. F. & Charon, N. W. Motility of the spirochete Leptospira. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 9, 101–110 (1988).
Tahara, H. et al. The mechanism of two-phase motility in the spirochete Leptospira: swimming and crawling. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar7975 (2018).
Charon, N. W. et al. The unique paradigm of spirochete motility and chemotaxis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 66, 349–370 (2012).
Vig, D. K. & Wolgemuth, C. W. Swimming dynamics of the Lyme disease spirochete. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 218104 (2012).
Berg, H. C. & Turner, L. Movement of microorganisms in viscous environments. Nature 278, 349–351 (1979).
Mehes, E. & Vicsek, T. Collective motion of cells: from experiments to models. Integr. Biol. 6, 831–854 (2014).
Vicsek, T. & Zafeiris, A. Collective motion. Phys. Rep. 517, 71–140 (2012).
Harshey, R. M. Bacterial motility on a surface: many ways to a common goal. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57, 249–273 (2003).
Kearns, D. B. A field guide to bacterial swarming motility. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 634–644 (2010). This review provides an exhaustive and pedagogical introduction to bacterial swarming motility.
Darnton, N. C., Turner, L., Rojevsky, S. & Berg, H. C. Dynamics of bacterial swarming. Biophys. J. 98, 2082–2090 (2010).
Partridge, J. D. & Harshey, R. M. Swarming: flexible roaming plans. J. Bacteriol. 195, 909–918 (2013).
McCarter, L. & Silverman, M. Surface-induced swarmer cell differentiation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Mol. Microbiol. 4, 1057–1062 (1990).
Alberti, L. & Harshey, R. M. Differentiation of Serratia marcescens 274 into swimmer and swarmer cells. J. Bacteriol. 172, 4322–4328 (1990).
Harshey, R. M. & Matsuyama, T. Dimorphic transition in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: surface-induced differentiation into hyperflagellate swarmer cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 8631–8635 (1994).
Rather, P. N. Swarmer cell differentiation in Proteus mirabilis. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 1065–1073 (2005).
Copeland, M. F. & Weibel, D. B. Bacterial swarming: a model system for studying dynamic self-assembly. Soft Matter 5, 1174–1187 (2009).
Jeckel, H. et al. Learning the space-time phase diagram of bacterial swarm expansion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1489–1494 (2019).
Srinivasan, S., Kaplan, C. N. & Mahadevan, L. A multiphase theory for spreading microbial swarms and films. eLife 8, e42697 (2019).
Williams, F. D. & Schwarzhoff, R. H. Nature of the swarming phenomenon in Proteus. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 32, 101–122 (1978).
Kearns, D. B. & Losick, R. Swarming motility in undomesticated Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 49, 581–590 (2003).
McCarter, L. The multiple identities of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1, 51–57 (1999).
Kohler, T., Curty, L. K., Barja, F., van Delden, C. & Pechere, J. C. Swarming of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is dependent on cell-to-cell signaling and requires flagella and pili. J. Bacteriol. 182, 5990–5996 (2000).
Ingham, C. J. & Ben Jacob, E. Swarming and complex pattern formation in Paenibacillus vortex studied by imaging and tracking cells. BMC Microbiol. 8, 36 (2008).
Be’er, A. et al. Paenibacillus dendritiformis bacterial colony growth depends on surfactant but not on bacterial motion. J. Bacteriol. 191, 5758–5764 (2009).
Rhodeland, B., Hoeger, K. & Ursell, T. Physical factors contributing to regulation of bacterial surface motility. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/719245 (2020).
Ping, L., Wu, Y., Hosu, B. G., Tang, J. X. & Berg, H. C. Osmotic pressure in a bacterial swarm. Biophys. J. 107, 871–878 (2014).
Daniels, R., Vanderleyden, J. & Michiels, J. Quorum sensing and swarming migration in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 28, 261–289 (2004).
Belas, R. Biofilms, flagella, and mechanosensing of surfaces by bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 22, 517–527 (2014).
Chawla, R., Gupta, R., Lele, T. P. & Lele, P. P. A skeptic’s guide to bacterial mechanosensing. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 523–533 (2020).
Laventie, B. J. & Jenal, U. Surface sensing and adaptation in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 74, 735–760 (2020).
Ilkanaiv, B., Kearns, D. B., Ariel, G. & Be’er, A. Effect of cell aspect ratio on swarming bacteria. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 158002 (2017).
Be’er, A. et al. A phase diagram for bacterial swarming. Commun. Phys. 3, 66 (2020).
Peruani, F., Deutsch, A. & Bar, M. Nonequilibrium clustering of self-propelled rods. Phys. Rev. E. 74, 030904 (2006).
Wensink, H. H. et al. Meso-scale turbulence in living fluids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14308–14313 (2012).
Zhang, H. P., Be’er, A., Florin, E. L. & Swinney, H. L. Collective motion and density fluctuations in bacterial colonies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 13626–13630 (2010).
Tuson, H. H., Copeland, M. F., Carey, S., Sacotte, R. & Weibel, D. B. Flagellum density regulates Proteus mirabilis swarmer cell motility in viscous environments. J. Bacteriol. 195, 368–377 (2013).
Partridge, J. D. & Harshey, R. M. More than motility: Salmonella flagella contribute to overriding friction and facilitating colony hydration during swarming. J. Bacteriol. 195, 919–929 (2013).
Turner, L., Zhang, R., Darnton, N. C. & Berg, H. C. Visualization of flagella during bacterial swarming. J. Bacteriol. 192, 3259–3267 (2010).
Turner, L., Ping, L., Neubauer, M. & Berg, H. C. Visualizing flagella while tracking bacteria. Biophys. J. 111, 630–639 (2016).
Ford, K. M., Antani, J. D., Nagarajan, A., Johnson, M. M. & Lele, P. P. Switching and torque generation in swarming E. coli. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2197 (2018).
Partridge, J. D., Nhu, N. T. Q., Dufour, Y. S. & Harshey, R. M. Tumble suppression is a conserved feature of swarming motility. mBio 11, e01189-20 (2020).
Mariconda, S., Wang, Q. & Harshey, R. M. A mechanical role for the chemotaxis system in swarming motility. Mol. Microbiol. 60, 1590–1602 (2006).
Sidortsov, M., Morgenstern, Y. & Be’er, A. Role of tumbling in bacterial swarming. Phys. Rev. E. 96, 022407 (2017).
Maier, B. & Wong, G. C. L. How bacteria use type IV pili machinery on surfaces. Trends Microbiol. 23, 775–788 (2015).
Burrows, L. L. Pseudomonas aeruginosa twitching motility: type IV pili in action. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 66, 493–520 (2012).
Craig, L., Forest, K. T. & Maier, B. Type IV pili: dynamics, biophysics and functional consequences. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 429–440 (2019). This is an in-depth review of the structure, function and dynamics of the bacterial type IV pilus machinery.
Mattick, J. S. Type IV pili and twitching motility. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56, 289–314 (2002).
Pelicic, V. Type IV pili: e pluribus unum? Mol. Microbiol. 68, 827–837 (2008).
Jarrell, K. F. & Albers, S. V. The archaellum: an old motility structure with a new name. Trends Microbiol. 20, 307–312 (2012).
Berry, J. L. & Pelicic, V. Exceptionally widespread nanomachines composed of type IV pilins: the prokaryotic Swiss Army knives. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 134–154 (2015).
Craig, L., Pique, M. E. & Tainer, J. A. Type IV pilus structure and bacterial pathogenicity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 363–378 (2004).
Piepenbrink, K. H. DNA uptake by type IV filaments. Front. Mol. Biosci. 6, 1 (2019).
Hepp, C. & Maier, B. Kinetics of DNA uptake during transformation provide evidence for a translocation ratchet mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12467–12472 (2016).
Ellison, C. K. et al. Retraction of DNA-bound type IV competence pili initiates DNA uptake during natural transformation in Vibrio cholerae. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 773–780 (2018).
Evans, K. J., Lambert, C. & Sockett, R. E. Predation by Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 requires type IV pili. J. Bacteriol. 189, 4850–4859 (2007).
Persat, A., Inclan, Y. F., Engel, J. N., Stone, H. A. & Gitai, Z. Type IV pili mechanochemically regulate virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7563–7568 (2015).
Schuergers, N. et al. Cyanobacteria use micro-optics to sense light direction. eLife 5, e12620 (2016).
Nakane, D. & Nishizaka, T. Asymmetric distribution of type IV pili triggered by directional light in unicellular cyanobacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6593–6598 (2017).
Oliveira, N. M., Foster, K. R. & Durham, W. M. Single-cell twitching chemotaxis in developing biofilms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6532–6537 (2016).
Ellison, C. K. et al. Obstruction of pilus retraction stimulates bacterial surface sensing. Science 358, 535–538 (2017). This study shows that type IV pili act mechanosensors to enable surface sensing in bacteria.
Snyder, R. A. et al. Surface sensing stimulates cellular differentiation in Caulobacter crescentus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 17984–17991 (2020).
Dufrêne, Y. F. & Persat, A. Mechanomicrobiology: how bacteria sense and respond to forces. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 227–240 (2020).
Korotkov, K. V., Sandkvist, M. & Hol, W. G. The type II secretion system: biogenesis, molecular architecture and mechanism. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 336–351 (2012).
Skerker, J. M. & Berg, H. C. Direct observation of extension and retraction of type IV pili. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6901–6904 (2001).
Merz, A. J., So, M. & Sheetz, M. P. Pilus retraction powers bacterial twitching motility. Nature 407, 98–102 (2000).
Clausen, M., Koomey, M. & Maier, B. Dynamics of type IV pili is controlled by switching between multiple states. Biophys. J. 96, 1169–1177 (2009).
Beaussart, A. et al. Nanoscale adhesion forces of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type IV Pili. ACS Nano 8, 10723–10733 (2014).
Maier, B. et al. Single pilus motor forces exceed 100 pN. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16012–16017 (2002).
Clausen, M., Jakovljevic, V., Sogaard-Andersen, L. & Maier, B. High-force generation is a conserved property of type IV pilus systems. J. Bacteriol. 191, 4633–4638 (2009).
Tala, L., Fineberg, A., Kukura, P. & Persat, A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa orchestrates twitching motility by sequential control of type IV pili movements. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 774–780 (2019).
Marathe, R. et al. Bacterial twitching motility is coordinated by a two-dimensional tug-of-war with directional memory. Nat. Commun. 5, 3759 (2014).
Jin, F., Conrad, J. C., Gibiansky, M. L. & Wong, G. C. Bacteria use type-IV pili to slingshot on surfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12617–12622 (2011).
Gibiansky, M. L. et al. Bacteria use type IV pili to walk upright and detach from surfaces. Science 330, 197 (2010).
Conrad, J. C. et al. Flagella and pili-mediated near-surface single-cell motility mechanisms in P. aeruginosa. Biophys. J. 100, 1608–1616 (2011).
Kühn, M. J. et al. Mechanotaxis directs Pseudomonas aeruginosa twitching motility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2101759118 (2021).
Treuner-Lange, A. et al. PilY1 and minor pilins form a complex priming the type IVa pilus in Myxococcus xanthus. Nat. Commun. 11, 5054 (2020).
Craig, L. et al. Type IV pilus structure by cryo-electron microscopy and crystallography: implications for pilus assembly and functions. Mol. Cell. 23, 651–662 (2006).
Koch, M. D., Fei, C., Wingreen, N. S., Shaevitz, J. W. & Gitai, Z. Competitive binding of independent extension and retraction motors explains the quantitative dynamics of type IV pili. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2014926118 (2021).
McCallum, M., Burrows, L. L. & Howell, P. L. The dynamic structures of the type IV pilus. Microbiol. Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PSIB-0006-2018 (2019).
McCallum, M., Tammam, S., Khan, A., Burrows, L. L. & Howell, P. L. The molecular mechanism of the type IVa pilus motors. Nat. Commun. 8, 15091 (2017).
Mancl, J. M., Black, W. P., Robinson, H., Yang, Z. & Schubot, F. D. Crystal structure of a type IV pilus assembly ATPase: insights into the molecular mechanism of PilB from Thermus thermophilus. Structure 24, 1886–1897 (2016).
McBride, M. J. Bacterial gliding motility: multiple mechanisms for cell movement over surfaces. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55, 49–75 (2001).
McBride, M. J. & Nakane, D. Flavobacterium gliding motility and the type IX secretion system. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 28, 72–77 (2015).
Nan, B., McBride, M. J., Chen, J., Zusman, D. R. & Oster, G. Bacteria that glide with helical tracks. Curr. Biol. 24, R169–R173 (2014).
Lapidus, I. R. & Berg, H. C. Gliding motility of Cytophaga sp. strain U67. J. Bacteriol. 151, 384–U398 (1982).
Nakane, D., Sato, K., Wada, H., McBride, M. J. & Nakayama, K. Helical flow of surface protein required for bacterial gliding motility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11145–11150 (2013). This study shows that surface adhesins that enable gliding motility in F. johnsoniae move in a helical path.
Shrivastava, A., Roland, T. & Berg, H. C. The screw-like movement of a gliding bacterium is powered by spiral motion of cell-surface adhesins. Biophys. J. 111, 1008–1013 (2016).
Braun, T. F., Khubbar, M. K., Saffarini, D. A. & McBride, M. J. Flavobacterium johnsoniae gliding motility genes identified by mariner mutagenesis. J. Bacteriol. 187, 6943–6952 (2005).
Braun, T. F. & McBride, M. J. Flavobacterium johnsoniae GldJ is a lipoprotein that is required for gliding motility. J. Bacteriol. 187, 2628–2637 (2005).
Nelson, S. S., Glocka, P. P., Agarwal, S., Grimm, D. P. & McBride, M. J. Flavobacterium johnsoniae SprA is a cell surface protein involved in gliding motility. J. Bacteriol. 189, 7145–7150 (2007).
Lauber, F., Deme, J. C., Lea, S. M. & Berks, B. C. Type 9 secretion system structures reveal a new protein transport mechanism. Nature 564, 77–82 (2018).
Pate, J. L. & Chang, L.-Y. E. Evidence that gliding motility in prokaryotic cells is driven by rotary assemblies in the cell envelopes. Curr. Microbiol. 2, 59–64 (1979).
Shrivastava, A., Lele, P. P. & Berg, H. C. A rotary motor drives Flavobacterium gliding. Curr. Biol. 25, 338–341 (2015). This study provides evidence that gliding motility of Bacteriodetes is powered by a rotary molecular motor.
Shrivastava, A. & Berg, H. C. A molecular rack and pinion actuates a cell-surface adhesin and enables bacterial gliding motility. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay6616 (2020). This study combines biophysical experiments with fluorescence imaging to propose a mechanistic model for gliding motility.
Shrivastava, A., Johnston, J. J., van Baaren, J. M. & McBride, M. J. Flavobacterium johnsoniae GldK, GldL, GldM, and SprA are required for secretion of the cell surface gliding motility adhesins SprB and RemA. J. Bacteriol. 195, 3201–3212 (2013).
Gorasia, D. G. et al. Structural insights into the PorK and PorN components of the Porphyromonas gingivalis type IX secretion system. PLoS Pathog. 12, e1005820 (2016).
Leone, P. et al. Type IX secretion system PorM and gliding machinery GldM form arches spanning the periplasmic space. Nat. Commun. 9, 429 (2018).
Islam, S. T. & Mignot, T. The mysterious nature of bacterial surface (gliding) motility: a focal adhesion-based mechanism in Myxococcus xanthus. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 46, 143–154 (2015).
Nan, B. & Zusman, D. R. Novel mechanisms power bacterial gliding motility. Mol. Microbiol. 101, 186–193 (2016).
Sun, M., Wartel, M., Cascales, E., Shaevitz, J. W. & Mignot, T. Motor-driven intracellular transport powers bacterial gliding motility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 7559–7564 (2011).
Nan, B. et al. Myxobacteria gliding motility requires cytoskeleton rotation powered by proton motive force. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2498–2503 (2011).
Faure, L. M. et al. The mechanism of force transmission at bacterial focal adhesion complexes. Nature 539, 530–535 (2016). By tracking the components of the M. xanthus adhesion complex, this study provides a molecular model for myxobacterial gliding motility.
Fu, G. et al. MotAB-like machinery drives the movement of MreB filaments during bacterial gliding motility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2484–2489 (2018).
Islam, S. T. et al. CglB adhesins secreted at bacterial focal adhesions mediate gliding motility. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.22.216333 (2020).
Waterbury, J. B., Willey, J. M., Franks, D. G., Valois, F. W. & Watson, S. W. A cyanobacterium capable of swimming motility. Science 230, 74–76 (1985).
Brahamsha, B. An abundant cell-surface polypeptide is required for swimming by the nonflagellated marine cyanobacterium. Synechococcus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 6504–6509 (1996).
Ehlers, K. & Oster, G. On the mysterious propulsion of Synechococcus. PLoS ONE 7, e36081 (2012).
Shaevitz, J. W., Lee, J. Y. & Fletcher, D. A. Spiroplasma swim by a processive change in body helicity. Cell 122, 941–945 (2005).
Tilney, L. G. & Portnoy, D. A. Actin filaments and the growth, movement, and spread of the intracellular bacterial parasite, Listeria monocytogenes. J. Cell Biol. 109, 1597–1608 (1989).
Stevens, J. M., Galyov, E. E. & Stevens, M. P. Actin-dependent movement of bacterial pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 91–101 (2006).
Lamason, R. L. & Welch, M. D. Actin-based motility and cell-to-cell spread of bacterial pathogens. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 35, 48–57 (2017).
Miyata, M. & Hamaguchi, T. Prospects for the gliding mechanism of Mycoplasma mobile. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 29, 15–21 (2016).
Miyata, M. & Hamaguchi, T. Integrated information and prospects for gliding mechanism of the pathogenic bacterium Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Front. Microbiol. 7, 960 (2016).
Hölscher, T. & Kovács, Á. T. Sliding on the surface: bacterial spreading without an active motor. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 2537–2545 (2017).
Seminara, A. et al. Osmotic spreading of Bacillus subtilis biofilms driven by an extracellular matrix. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1116–1121 (2012).
Grau, R. R. et al. A duo of potassium-responsive histidine kinases govern the multicellular destiny of Bacillus subtilis. mBio 6, e00581-15 (2015).
Murray, T. S. & Kazmierczak, B. I. Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibits sliding motility in the absence of type IV pili and flagella. J. Bacteriol. 190, 2700–2708 (2008).
Matsuyama, T., Bhasin, A. & Harshey, R. M. Mutational analysis of flagellum-independent surface spreading of Serratia marcescens 274 on a low-agar medium. J. Bacteriol. 177, 987–991 (1995).
Shrout, J. D. A fantastic voyage for sliding bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 23, 244–246 (2015).
Lauga, E. & Powers, T. R. The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms. Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 096601 (2009).
Schuech, R., Hoehfurtner, T., Smith, D. J. & Humphries, S. Motile curved bacteria are Pareto-optimal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14440–14447 (2019).
Berg, H. C. How bacteria swim. Sci. Am. 233, 36–45 (1975).
Milne, J. L. et al. Cryo-electron microscopy–a primer for the non-microscopist. FEBS J. 280, 28–45 (2013).
Egelman, E. H. The current revolution in cryo-EM. Biophys. J. 110, 1008–1012 (2016).
The authors thank K. Fahrner for critical reading of the manuscript. N.W. is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the US National Institutes of Health under award number K99GM134124. H.C.B. has been supported by the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the US National Science Foundation and the Rowland Institute for Science.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Microbiology thanks W. Durham, who co-reviewed with J. H. R. Wheeler, D. Kearns and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
- Reynolds number
A dimensionless parameter in the equations of motion of fluids that indicates the relative importance of inertial forces, forces that accelerate fluids and viscous forces, which shear fluids.
Movement across surfaces that occurs when thin filaments are extended outwards from the cell, stick to the substratum at their distal tips and then are disassembled at their base.
Movement across surfaces that occurs when adhesins, driven along tracks fixed to the cell wall, adhere to the substratum.
- Flagellar filaments
Long, thin and rigid components of the bacterial flagellum, subject to changes in crystal polymorphic form which, when rotated at their base, generate thrust that pushes the cell forward.
Groups of flagellar filaments rotating in parallel that push a peritrichously flagellated cell forward.
Flagellation with filaments that appear at one or the other pole: monotrichous, single filaments; lophotrichous, a tuft of filaments.
- Brownian motion
Random motion of an object suspended in a fluid caused by collisions with the molecules of the fluid.
A behavioural response to chemical gradients whereby cells move towards regions that contain more nutrients (or nutrient homologues) and away from noxious regions.
- Random walk
Migration by stepping in directions chosen at random. The walk is biased if steps in a particular direction are longer or more frequent.
- Tethered cells
Cells fixed to glass by a single flagellar filament and, instead of rotating the flagellar filament, the motor rotates the cell body.
- Stator units
Also known as force-generating units, torque-generating units or MotA–MotB complexes, an assembly of five MotA proteins and two MotB proteins supporting two transmembrane ion channels that powers flagellar rotation.
- Proton motive force
The electrochemical gradient of protons across a membrane due to a combination of the membrane potential and the concentration gradient of protons. Protons driven down this electrochemical gradient energize various cellular processes, including flagellar rotation, ATP synthesis and ion transport.
Denoted by either μ or η, a parameter indicating the magnitude of the force required to shear a fluid. Water has a relatively small viscosity, molasses has a relatively large viscosity.
- Newtonian fluid
A fluid in which the viscosity does not depend on the rate of shear (for example, water and solutions of Ficoll). Solutions containing long unbranched chains, such as mucus, hyaluronic acid, methyl cellulose or polyvinylpyrrolidone, are not Newtonian fluids.
Small organic compounds that are synthesized by the cell to affect intracellular or extracellular osmolarity.
Compounds that when added to a liquid lower its surface tension. Soap and detergent are common examples.
- Surface tension
The tendency of liquid surfaces to minimize the surface area and resist extension. Liquids with lower surface tension spread more easily.
A round gear that transmits motion to a larger gear or a rack.
A linear gear that engages with the pinion and translates rotational motion into linear motion.
About this article
Cite this article
Wadhwa, N., Berg, H.C. Bacterial motility: machinery and mechanisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 20, 161–173 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00626-4
Flagellin outer domain dimerization modulates motility in pathogenic and soil bacteria from viscous environments
Nature Communications (2022)
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2022)
1H, 13C and 15N chemical shift assignments of the ZnR and GYF cytoplasmic domains of the GltJ protein from Myxococcus xanthus
Biomolecular NMR Assignments (2022)