Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Prospects for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines in Africa


The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in a global pandemic, prompting unprecedented efforts to contain the virus. Many developed countries have implemented widespread testing and have rapidly mobilized research programmes to develop vaccines and therapeutics. However, these approaches may be impractical in Africa, where the infrastructure for testing is poorly developed and owing to the limited manufacturing capacity to produce pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, a large burden of HIV-1 and tuberculosis in Africa could exacerbate the severity of infection and may affect vaccine immunogenicity. This Review discusses global efforts to develop diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines, with these considerations in mind. We also highlight vaccine and diagnostic production platforms that are being developed in Africa and that could be translated into clinical development through appropriate partnerships for manufacture.


Coronaviruses are ubiquitous RNA viruses that are responsible for endemic infections in humans and other animals, and sporadic outbreaks of potentially fatal respiratory disease in humans. Four human coronaviruses, namely HCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-HKU1, circulate in the human population, causing the common cold, with some causing potentially life-threatening disease in infants, young children, older individuals and individuals who are immunocompromised1. In the recent past, two additional coronaviruses have crossed the species barrier from other animals to infect humans. These are severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), which emerged in 2002 and 2012, respectively2,3. In December 2019, a novel betacoronavirus, subsequently named SARS-CoV-2, was implicated in an outbreak of respiratory disease in Wuhan, China4. The first cases to be reported presented as atypical pneumonia and were traced to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, although cases without any association with the market, and predating the putative index cases, were subsequently recognized. Following these first reports, community transmission rapidly ensued, culminating in a global pandemic5,6.

The virus is speculated to have originated in bats and possibly to have passed through another host before infecting humans, but an intermediate host or intermediate hosts have yet to be defined. This remains the subject of considerable debate, and recent work suggests that the host receptor-binding motif of SARS-CoV-2 was acquired through recombination with a pangolin coronavirus7,8,9, but further work is needed to establish the origin of the virus. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 in humans manifests as coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), a spectrum of disease that ranges from asymptomatic infection to acute respiratory distress syndrome with multisystem involvement. Older individuals and individuals with co-morbidities are at greatest risk10. In individuals who are symptomatic, fever and cough are most commonly reported, although sore throat, shortness of breath, fatigue, anosmia, dysgeusia and gastrointestinal involvement are also frequently observed5,11. Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 are being increasingly recognized. Among adults with pre-existing diabetes mellitus, diabetic ketoacidosis may be a common complication and is associated with a poor prognosis12,13. According to the International Diabetes Federation, Africa has an estimated 19.4 million adults aged between 20 and 79 years living with diabetes and is the region with the highest proportion of undiagnosed diabetes14. Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications have also been recognized as presenting or complicating factors15. Children generally have a milder course of disease and are more likely to be asymptomatic, although recent reports have described hyperinflammatory shock in children who were previously asymptomatic that seems similar to Kawasaki disease16,17,18. Further studies are required to determine the prevalence of this phenomenon and to define the immunological drivers of the illness. However, the contrasting presentation of COVID-19 in children and adults suggests that the immune responses of children and adults to SARS-CoV-2 may be different.

The virus continued to spread globally, prompting the implementation of radical travel restrictions and social distancing measures19. At the time of writing this article, the virus has resulted in over 25 million confirmed infections and has claimed the lives of over 850,000 people6. As of 8 August 2020, there have been over 1.2 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Africa, with 29,833 deaths reported (Africa CDC) There is concern that the pandemic may pose an even greater risk to countries in Africa owing to their weak health-care infrastructure, large burden of co-infections, including HIV-1 and tuberculosis, and ongoing outbreaks of emerging and re-emerging infections such as Ebola virus (Democratic Republic of Congo) and Lassa haemorrhagic fever (Nigeria) that will divert much-needed resources away from the fight against COVID-19 (ref.20) (Fig. 1). Differences in global population demographics and health status are also likely to affect the severity of the pandemic in different regions and are a major concern in Africa (Fig. 2). In addition to the health-care infrastructure, the general infrastructure throughout Africa is also highly variable, and thus access to appropriate medical care is an important determinant of COVID-19 disease outcome. The number of hospital beds in a population of 10,000 individuals varies from as low as 1 in Mali to 32 in Libya. However, Libya is an exception for the region, and many central and west African countries are at the lower end of this range and generally report fewer than 10 beds per 10,000 individuals. This is in stark contrast to other developed countries such as Germany and the USA, where 80 and 28.7 beds per 10,000 individuals are available, respectively. A similar trend is also seen for the number of doctors per 10,000 individuals. In more than 10 African countries, less than 1 doctor is available (per 10,000 individuals), whereas Germany and the USA report 42 and 26 doctors (per 10,000 individuals), respectively21.

Fig. 1: Challenges for African countries in their response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The limited capacity for testing and contact tracing, poor health-care systems, lack of pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity and underdeveloped infrastructure in Africa pose several challenges that constrain the response of the region to the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This is worsened by the high burden of infectious diseases, which may worsen disease outcome and compete for the available resources. A further challenge is the dire economic consequences of prolonged lockdowns in countries with weak economies.

Fig. 2: Global population demographics and health-care status underscore important risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease.

Population demographics and prevalence of known co-morbidities for each of the six World Health Organization regions. Although Africa reports a lower average age compared with other regions, the burden of infectious disease is disproportionately high. Both HIV and tuberculosis are associated with an increase in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) disease severity, and their prevalence in Africa will increase the risk of fatal infection for a large number of people. There is also a large proportion of individuals in Africa with raised blood pressure, which is a known risk factor for severe disease. Other known co-morbidities, including raised cholesterol, raised glucose and obesity, are less prevalent in Africa compared with the other reported regions. Raised blood pressure (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm/Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg), raised fasting blood glucose levels (≥7 mmol/l or taking medication), raised total cholesterol levels (≥5 mmol/l) and body mass index (BMI) >25 are reflected as age-standardized estimates. All data shown reflect the latest available data from the World Health Data Platform (Global Health Observatory). The number of people living with HIV-1/AIDS (in millions) reflects the population of individuals who were infected in 2018, tuberculosis cases shown reflect the number of incident cases in 2018 and malaria cases reflect the estimated number of cases in 2017.

Concerns have been raised regarding the impact of the pandemic on other diseases and access to essential medicines22. For example, according to a newspaper article, the Ministry of Health in Zimbabwe reported a 45% increase in malaria infections compared with 2019 (ref.23). Many African countries lack the capacity to implement widespread testing, including the identification of asymptomatic and mild infections that are major drivers of the pandemic24. Although it is difficult to determine the number of tests conducted in many Africa countries, the publicly available data clearly highlight the limited testing capacity on the continent. South Africa is currently conducting the largest number of tests per 10,000 individuals (0.5/10,000 individuals), whereas many other countries, including Ethiopia, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Tunisia, Senegal and Rwanda, perform fewer than 0.1 tests/10,000 individuals. This is markedly less than in the USA (1.54/10,000 individuals), the UK (0.9/10,000 individuals), Italy (0.91/10,000 individuals) or Germany (0.55/10,000 individuals)25. Similar infrastructure limitations constrain the development of prophylactic vaccines and therapeutic interventions, which results in a concerning reliance on developed countries. Another important consideration in the response to the pandemic in Africa will be to limit the impact of the virus on vulnerable economies where prolonged lockdowns may not be feasible.

The first case of COVID-19 in Africa was reported in Egypt on 14 February 2020; subsequently, infections have been documented in 44 other African countries, with South Africa reporting the highest number of cases6. Interestingly, in spite of the obvious challenges in combatting the growing pandemic, African countries have observed a delay in the exponential growth trajectory that has been described by countries in the developed world26. This may be partly attributable to lower testing capacity in the region and the impact of implementing lockdowns in the early phase of the pandemic. The warmer climate has also been proposed to influence the spread of COVID-19, which could explain the delayed pandemic in Africa compared with the rest of the world, although this is largely speculative (Box 1). The transition into winter in southern Africa has been accompanied by an increase in SARS-CoV-2 infections, further complicated by seasonal influenza and limited influenza vaccine availability. In this Review, we discuss the global efforts to develop diagnostic tests and therapeutic options to treat COVID-19, as well as the vaccine platforms for immunization, with a focus on the opportunities and challenges for Africa.

COVID-19 diagnostics in Africa

The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 poses a major challenge owing to the prevalence of asymptomatic infections, pre-symptomatic infections with high viral loads in the upper airways (probably at peak infectivity) and the range of non-specific symptoms that manifest in individuals who are symptomatic5,24. Widespread testing is therefore critical to identify infected individuals who are asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic and symptomatic, and to enable contact tracing and isolation27. Whereas this has been highly successful in countries such as Germany and South Korea, it is not generally possible in most African countries where the infrastructure is weak. Indeed, in countries such as South Africa, where widespread community testing was attempted, this has resulted in a very large backlog of tests and delays of weeks for returning test results, which are then rendered meaningless for quarantining of cases and containment28. In many African countries, testing is only available for severe cases of presumed COVID-19, and self-isolation is recommended for less severe cases. Therefore, reported cases and true prevalence do not equate. Accordingly, the capacity provided by academic laboratories and pharmaceutical companies is being leveraged to increase testing capacity further, as has been necessary even in developed countries29.

Diagnosis of acute infection is by PCR with reverse transcription of respiratory tract specimens, which is generally performed in central laboratories with specialized equipment30. Scale-up of testing is a major challenge for countries in Africa, owing to laboratory infrastructure, costs and availability of test reagents that are largely imported and currently stretched global supply chains. A recently launched, continent-wide initiative, the Africa Medical Supplies Platform, seeks to leverage collective purchasing for procurement of testing supplies, personal protective equipment, medical equipment and even, potentially, future vaccines31. In addition, repurposing of rapid, automated molecular diagnostics platforms such as GeneXpert® (Cepheid), which is widely used for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in South Africa, has the potential to decentralize and accelerate testing in certain countries, including using mobile testing centres, although test kits are also in limited supply. However, this has to be understood in the light of the potential for unintended consequences on the management of tuberculosis, with fewer diagnostic platforms being available as a result of increased SARS-CoV-2 testing. Testing for tuberculosis in South Africa has reportedly decreased by 50% during the lockdown period and, concurrently, the weekly average of microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis cases decreased by 33% (ref.32).

Recently, a rapid method of heating samples prior to quantitative PCR with reverse transcription has shown promise to improve the turnaround time for testing and bypasses the need to order RNA extraction reagents or kits33. Furthermore, a rapid CRISPR–Cas12-based test has also been developed to diagnose infection from respiratory sample-derived RNA34. The test yields a result within 1 h and is less reliant on sophisticated laboratory infrastructure and test reagents that are in limited supply. Implementing this test in Africa could be a useful way of expanding the current testing capacity and could offer a faster turnaround time for high-priority cases.

Serology-based testing approaches have been proposed, but the delay between infection and the development of detectable antibodies (within 19 days) renders this approach impractical for the diagnosis of acute infection35,36. Nonetheless, these tests are critical for seroprevalence studies and to identify appropriate donors for convalescent sera, and potentially for the isolation of monoclonal antibodies that can be developed as therapeutics. Serology studies are also crucial for understanding the longevity of the antibody response after infection, with the key caveat that it is not known whether humoral responses are a correlate of immunity against the virus. In addition, preliminary data suggest that not all individuals who are infected may seroconvert37, and early evidence is emerging that antibody levels may wane rapidly during the convalescent phase38. Several serological assays have already been developed, and binding antibodies against the spike and nucleocapsid proteins are both indicative of past SARS-CoV-2 infection39,40. Many of these assays are also commercially available, but their specificity and sensitivities seem to be variable41. A major outstanding question is which antigen, or region of the antigen, is most appropriate for serology testing. Most assays have favoured the spike glycoprotein for the detection of an immune response against the virus, although it is worth noting that the nucleocapsid is the most abundant viral antigen42.

Recent work has suggested that the receptor-binding domain alone may be sufficient to detect antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2, and given that it is not conserved between coronaviruses, its use may limit cross-reactivity arising from other coronavirus infections43. Nonetheless, a nucleocapsid-based ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) may be the easiest to implement in an African context as the antigen could easily be produced locally at low cost. Nucleocapsid could be produced in Escherichia coli, Pichia pastoris or even in plants, as has been reported for the nucleocapsid proteins of three bunyaviruses, two of which were used successfully in validated assays44,45,46. Moreover, the Biovac Institute in South Africa has the capacity for bacterial fermentation and the required infrastructure for downstream processing, and a new plant-based production facility (Cape Bio Pharms) is currently generating S1 protein derivatives as reagents. Although the spike glycoprotein is heavily glycosylated and needs to be expressed in a more complex expression host to ensure appropriate post-translational modifications, both mammalian cells and plants would be suitable to produce both spike and nucleocapsid, and novel approaches to enhance recombinant glycoprotein production in plants have also been developed in South Africa47.

Therapeutic options to treat COVID-19

Given the optimistic development timeline of 12–18 months before any vaccines could be available for widespread use, it is clear that these efforts will not affect the first wave of the pandemic48. More importantly, the lack of manufacturing capacity in Africa and the global demand for immunization against the virus will further delay the availability of vaccines in the region. Repurposing existing drugs presents a feasible short-term strategy to manage the pandemic, especially given that some of the drug candidates are already available and have an established safety profile in humans49. These drugs would face lower regulatory barriers for approval and, in addition to being used for treating active infections, may have potential to be used as prophylactics for individuals at high risk, such as health-care workers or those who have been in contact with documented cases of infection.

Currently, two treatments have been shown to have an effect on the outcome of COVID-19. The broad-spectrum antiviral drug remdesivir has been shown to shorten the recovery time in adults admitted to hospital with severe COVID-19 in a publication of preliminary results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in the USA50. However, remdesivir did not reduce mortality. By contrast, initial data from the recent RECOVERY trial in the UK suggest that daily oral or intravenous doses of dexamethasone (10 mg for 10 days) reduced mortality by one-fifth in hospitalized patients with proven COVID-19 requiring oxygen therapy, and that mortality was reduced by one-third in patients who needed mechanical ventilation51. It had no effect on patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who were not requiring oxygen. The reductions in mortality were seen in patients whose symptoms started >7 days before receipt of the drug. The fact that a commonly used corticosteroid could reduce mortality in this trial is promising, as numerous other corticosteroids such as prednisolone and hydrocortisone (which were options in the RECOVERY trial in pregnant women) are equally available, and some of them are manufactured in Africa, which means that access may be less of an issue than for other more novel medicines.

More commonly available medicines have been, and some continue to be, used in investigational treatments for COVID-19. The commonly available antimalarials chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine were among the first to be investigated. Initial studies were small and underpowered, and some combined hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin52 and some proved highly controversial in relation to their conduct, leading to retraction53. One of the arms of the RECOVERY trial included hydroxychloroquine, and on 4 June 2020 the independent data monitoring committee review of the data concluded that there was no beneficial effect of hydroxychloroquine in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (ref.54). Shortly after, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced that recruitment for the hydroxychloroquine arm of the SOLIDARITY trial was being stopped55,56.

All experimental treatments should either be introduced into properly conducted clinical trials or, if a country decides to use such a medicine outside a trial, then it should be controlled according to the WHO’s Monitored Emergency Use of Unregistered Interventions (MEURI) framework, whereby it can be ethically appropriate to offer individuals investigational interventions on an emergency basis, in the context of an outbreak characterized by high mortality57. Large-scale adaptive studies such as the RECOVERY and SOLIDARITY trials continue, and such trials will reduce the time taken for randomized clinical trials58. Several African countries, including South Africa, Burkina Faso and Senegal, are in the process of joining the SOLIDARITY study.

Similarly, small studies are ongoing in several countries, looking at the utility of convalescent plasma from patients who recently recovered from COVID-19 as potential prophylaxis or treatment59. The need for randomized control trials using this treatment modality has been stressed60. Unlike other investigational medicines, convalescent plasma can be readily produced, even in low and middle-income countries, through the national blood transfusion service, making it an attractive option for study. However, scaling production for use is the rate-limiting step for this intervention. Preliminary studies identified monoclonal antibodies with the ability to neutralize SARS-CoV-2, which may also be important candidates for both treatment and prophylaxis, although similar issues with manufacture are a challenge61,62.

There is increasing recognition that pathophysiology of severe COVID-19 includes an appreciable component of hyperactivation of inflammatory responses, manifesting as a cytokine storm and secondary haemophagocytic lymphocytic histiocytosis. In addition to the findings relating to dexamethasone detailed above, various immune-modulating drugs have been proposed as treatment options for COVID-19. The IL-6 inhibitors tocilizumab (Actemra; Roche) and sarilumab (Kevzara; Sanofi and Regeneron), which are used to treat arthritis, are already being used in patients with COVID-19 (NCT04327388)63. Their mechanism of action involves the prevention and the inhibition of the overactive inflammatory responses in the lungs. Both drugs have entered phase III clinical trials for SARS-CoV-2. A late-stage clinical trial with another IL-6 inhibitor, siltuximab (Sylvant; EUSA), started in Italy in mid-March (NCT04322188). Anti-inflammatory drugs used in combination with an antiviral drug such as remdesivir may increase the potential of the drug to improve disease outcome64. Genentech has recently initiated a phase III trial (REMDECTA) to study the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab and remdesivir in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (NCT04409262). Additionally, the COVACTA study (NCT04320615) will evaluate tocilizumab and standard of care versus standard of care alone in a similar cohort65.

Patients who have chronic medical conditions may be at higher risk for serious illness from COVID-19, including those with pulmonary fibrosis66. The antifibrotic drug pirfenidone (Genentech) has already entered a study to evaluate its efficacy and safety (NCT04282902). Recombinant angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2; APN01) that lacks the transmembrane region of the protein was developed by Apeiron Biologics for the treatment of acute lung injury and pulmonary artery hypertension. The soluble ACE2 has the potential to reduce lung injury by activating the anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory angiotensin (1–7)–Mas receptor axis of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, and by acting as a decoy and preventing infection by binding to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and inactivating it. APN01 is being tested in a phase I trial in China, and approval has been secured to carry out phase II trials in Austria, Germany and Denmark (NCT04335136).

Currently, there are no targeted therapies for COVID-19. However, numerous drug discovery programmes are in progress, and a recent study reported a structure-based drug design strategy, as well as virtual and high-throughput screening to identify lead compounds that bind to the main protease of the virus (Mpro; also known as 3CLpro)67. The active site of the protease is highly conserved among coronaviruses, making a strong case for pursuing an Mpro-targeting drug. The organoselenium drug ebselen, which is an anti-inflammatory and antioxidant, showed high affinity for Mpro and showed promising antiviral activity (concentration that gives half-maximal response EC50 = 4.67 μM). Thus, the presented approach may greatly accelerate the discovery of drug leads with potential in the clinic.

The Drug Discovery and Development Centre (H3D) based at the University of Cape Town is the only fully integrated drug discovery centre in Africa that has taken a drug into a phase II clinical trial. The centre has very strong collaborations with the pharmaceutical industry and MMV, a leading product development partnership, as well as the infrastructure and expertise to find potential therapies against COVID-19. H3D has assembled chemical libraries for its malaria and tuberculosis projects that could be screened to identify possible drug leads against SARS-CoV-2; however, this will require additional resources and funding because the centre is contractually focused on antimalarial and anti-tuberculosis drug development.

Vaccine platforms and implementation

The infrastructure for large-scale, high-volume vaccine manufacturing is largely absent in Africa, and the rapidly escalating COVID-19 pandemic highlights the urgent need for capital investment in the region to lessen reliance on developed countries. The few facilities that are available are specialized, and are not well-suited to produce vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 (Table 1). It is also anticipated that it would take a minimum of 18 months to build a suitable manufacturing plant under ideal conditions, and therefore to contribute to the global COVID-19 vaccine initiative, African developers will need to outsource large-scale manufacturing in the short term. The African Vaccine Manufacturing Initiative, which aims to develop local manufacturing capacity in Africa, has established a working group and is actively engaged with key stakeholders to meet the local need for a vaccine. Innovative Biotech (Nigeria) has already partnered with Medigen (USA) and Merck (Germany) to apply their insect cell production platform to producing virus-like particles with the intention of initiating a clinical trial in Nigeria. Similarly, the Ethiopian Public health Institute (EPHI) is planning to partner with TechInvention (India) to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in a yeast-based fermentation system, although limited details are available (personal communication, S. Agwale, CEO of Innovative Biotech). Last, Biovac (South Africa) has modern facilities at a modest scale and has initiated a feasibility study for a large-scale facility with an annual minimum production capacity of 100 million vaccine doses for COVID-19 and future pandemic vaccines, as well as vaccines for routine immunization use (personal communication, P. Tippoo, Head of Science and Innovation, Biovac).

Table 1 Infrastructure for human vaccine manufacturing in Africa

Given the global demand for a COVID-19 vaccine, it is likely that even when a suitable candidate is approved for human use, there will be a considerable delay before it is available in Africa. This is not unprecedented — during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, a global shortage of influenza vaccines resulted in limited supplies being provided for countries in the region, and, in fact, the vaccines only became generally available after 2010 (ref.68). This unfortunate, but entirely plausible, scenario may necessitate prioritizing high-risk groups, such as health-care workers and older individuals, to receive the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccines to reach Africa.

More than 100 vaccine candidates are currently in preclinical development around the world, and 15 vaccines are already being tested in clinical trials69,70 (Table 2). These vaccines are mostly focused on eliciting immunity against the spike glycoprotein, although other viral antigens may also have a role in vaccine-mediated protection (Box 2). The speed of clinical deployment of these vaccines is unprecedented, but there are concerns regarding the longevity of immune responses and the potential for vaccine-mediated enhancement of infection (Box 3). Although the rapid progress to clinical testing is encouraging, it is still too early to determine whether they will confer immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection or whether they will ameliorate the disease course following infection. The only peer-reviewed report of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in clinical trial to date is for CanSino Biologics’ Ad5-nCoV vaccine, which recently completed phase I testing. Encouragingly, the vaccine elicited both binding antibodies and antigen-specific T cells, although, disappointingly, only 50% of volunteers developed neutralizing antibodies in the low (5 × 1010 viral particles) and medium (1 × 1011 viral particles) dose regimens. However, 75% of the high-dose group (1.5 × 1011 viral particles) developed neutralizing antibodies. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the high-dose group also reported a higher incidence of adverse effects following vaccination and only the low and intermediate doses will be pursued in phase II trials71.

Table 2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates currently in clinical testing

Despite the absence of suitable facilities for current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP)-compliant vaccine or therapeutics manufacturing in most of Africa, considerable expertise in preclinical vaccine development is also available in academic institutes, and vaccines could be manufactured on contract for clinical trials as was the case for the South African AIDS Vaccine Initiative72. Accordingly, groups at the University of Cape Town (South Africa), the National Research Centre (Egypt) and the Kenya Aids Vaccine Initiative (KAVI) have all confirmed that early-stage research on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development is underway — although further details have not been disclosed73. Important considerations for these vaccines will be the cost, their safety in individuals who are immunocompromised and the availability of manufacturing partners who can produce the vaccines at the required scale. With these restrictions in mind, non-replicating viral vectors, DNA vaccines and cell and plant-based subunit immunogens are arguably the most suitable prospects. Alternatively, if suitable capital investment is made available, a cGMP-compliant facility could be established with the intention of manufacturing one of the vaccines that is already in clinical development.

Genetic immunization with plasmid DNA is perhaps the easiest vaccine modality to develop for clinical trials as the manufacturing process is well established, the incumbent costs are low compared with other platforms and multiple clinical trials have shown their safety. Technological advances have also substantially reduced the time from identifying the viral sequence to initiating immunizations in humans74. Accordingly, DNA vaccines have been advanced into the clinic in response to several emerging pathogens, including MERS-CoV, and Inovio Pharmaceuticals (USA) have already completed recruiting participants to initiate a phase I trial with a candidate DNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (NCT04336410)75. Recent preclinical data demonstrated that the vaccine elicited neutralizing antibodies in both mice and guinea pigs, and an unrelated study reported that immunization with a DNA vaccine protected against viral challenge in macaques76,77. Genetic immunization is well-suited to clinical development for Africa, and candidate vaccines could be manufactured to cGMP standards using one of the contract manufacturers offering this service. However, there are no licensed human vaccines based on this platform, and the current delivery methods are not suitable for large-scale immunization.

Host-restricted viral vectors are another promising vector platform for immunization in Africa78. Replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus-based vaccines have shown promise for several emerging viruses, and given their simian origin, they circumvent concerns for vector-specific immunity as was observed when using human adenoviral vectors for immunization79. A single dose of a MERS-CoV-2 vaccine using this platform was reported to elicit protective immunity in non-human primates80. More recently, a single immunization with ChAdOx1 encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike protected against pneumonia and lowered viral loads in both bronchoalveolar lavage and respiratory tract samples in macaques following challenge81. This effect was observed in the absence of high titres of neutralizing antibodies and the impact of the vaccine was to ameliorate severe disease rather than to prevent infection. Although it is disappointing that the vaccine did not confer sterilizing immunity in monkeys, it is noteworthy that the monkeys only received a single immunization and that the inoculum used for challenge was high. It should be noted that the high-challenge inoculum was conceived to determine whether immunization resulted in vaccine-mediated enhancement of infection, and that there was no evidence to suggest that this would be a concern81. This is the vaccine being pursued by the University of Oxford in collaboration with AstraZeneca that is now in phase II testing. A clinical trial for this vaccine has recently been initiated in Johannesburg (South Africa), and this is the first vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 to be tested in Africa. The manufacturing cost of ChAdOx1 would be far less than for a subunit vaccine and, moreover, no adjuvant is needed for immunization.

Poxvirus-based vectors are similarly attractive: they elicit strong humoral and cellular immune responses, can be manufactured at low cost and are stable in the absence of a sustained cold chain78,82. In addition, they can accommodate larger genetic insertions, which could be exploited to encode multiple SARS-CoV-2 genes (such as the spike, nucleocapsid, membrane and envelope antigens) and could potentially produce virus-like particles. Suitable examples of candidate poxvirus vectors include the attenuated orthopoxviruses modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA)83 and NYVAC84, the avipoxviruses canarypox virus (ALVAC)85 and fowlpox virus (FWPV)86, and the capripoxvirus lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV)87. MVA is the most widely explored of these vectors. Having been attenuated by more than 570 passages in chick embryo fibroblast cells, MVA has a well established safety record, including in individuals who are immunocompromised, and has recently been approved as a vaccine against smallpox88,89. NYVAC was engineered by the purposeful deletion of 18 genes involved in host range and pathogenicity; it causes no disseminated disease in immunodeficient mice, like MVA, and is unable to replicate in humans90. Several MVA-vectored vaccines of particular relevance to Africa have shown promise in clinical trials, usually in prime-boost regimens together with other vectors such as DNA or adenovirus. These include vaccines against HIV-1 (ref.91), Mycobacterium tuberculosis92 and Ebola virus93. LSD, a notifiable disease of cattle worldwide, is prevalent in most African countries, and the live-attenuated Neethling vaccine strain is widely used to control the disease on the continent94. LSDV is being developed both as a multivalent cattle vaccine vector87,95 and as a host-restricted HIV-1 vaccine vector96. It has been shown to have no adverse effects in immunodeficient mice, and although this vector could not be used in countries free of LSDV, it has potential as a human vaccine in sub-Saharan Africa96. Together with MVA and NYVAC, the avipoxvirus vectors ALVAC (attenuated canarypox virus) and FWPV are probably more realistic targets for rapid clinical development, as they have also undergone testing in humans, and ALVAC is already licensed for several veterinary applications97. At present, there are no cGMP-accredited manufacturers of adenovirus or poxvirus-based vaccines for humans in Africa. Sanofi Pasteur (France) supplies ALVAC-based vaccines, Virax (Australia) manufactures FWPV and MVA-based vaccines are manufactured by multiple companies including Geovax Labs, Inc. (USA), ProBioGen (Germany) and Bavarian Nordic (Denmark). Similarly, chimpanzee adenovirus-based vaccines are manufactured at the Jenner Institute (UK) or in collaboration with established manufacturing partners. Capripoxviruses are manufactured as veterinary vaccines, although the only cGMP-approved manufacturer is MCI Santé Animale (Morocco).

Plant-based vaccine protein production is an emerging technology that is well-suited to resource-limited areas given the capacity of the system for rapidly scalable production, the low manufacturing costs and the less sophisticated infrastructure requirements than mammalian expression systems98. The platform is well established to produce diverse classes of recombinant proteins, and recent advances in expression technologies and molecular engineering have also enabled improvements in glycoprotein production in plants47,99. Encouragingly, a preliminary pilot study suggests that these approaches can be applied to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike in Nicotiana benthamiana plants, warranting further testing of the recombinant antigen in preclinical vaccine immunogenicity models100. Three leading plant biotechnology companies, Medicago Inc. (Canada), Ibio Inc. (USA) and Kentucky BioProcessing Inc. (USA), have already announced the successful production of candidate virus-like particle vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Although plant-based manufacturing of recombinant protein antigens may be the most suitable solution for Africa, it may also pose a challenge for manufacturing. The major advantages of plant-based vaccine production for SARS-CoV-2 in Africa are the lower costs and the potential for rapid production scale-up to accommodate the large demand for a vaccine. This is best demonstrated in the context of influenza vaccine development, as a fully formulated virus-like particle vaccine was produced within 3 weeks following release of the viral sequence101. This rapid development timeline supported the production of 10 million doses of the vaccine within 1 month102. However, despite the costs to establish a GMP-compliant plant-based manufacturing facility being considerably less than those for the equivalent mammalian platform (for example, US$80–100 million versus US$250–350 million, respectively), they are not insignificant, and the capital investment required has been prohibitive for Africa98. Furthermore, there are few suitable contract manufacturing organizations worldwide, and these are already invested in their own SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development programmes.

Several recent preliminary data have suggested a possible correlation between Bacille Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccination and lower prevalence and mortality due to COVID-19 (refs103,104,105,106). The BCG vaccine is one of the most widely used vaccines worldwide and has been used to vaccinate against tuberculosis for nearly 100 years. The vaccine comprises a live, attenuated form of Mycobacterium bovis, which provides protection against disseminated forms of tuberculosis in infants but gives variable protection against pulmonary tuberculosis in adults107,108. Non-specific cross-protection against other pathogens, including those causing respiratory tract infections, has also been documented109. This effect may be attributable to altered expression of host cytokines and pattern-recognition receptors, as well as the reprogramming of different cellular metabolic pathways that, in turn, increases the innate immune response to other pathogens109,110. However, potential correlation between BCG vaccination and COVID-19 severity should be interpreted with caution. First, it is unlikely that BCG vaccination at birth will still provide non-specific cross-protection against viral pathogens in older individuals. Second, the correlation could be influenced by numerous unknown confounding factors, including variation in testing between countries, which leads to differences in the recorded case numbers; differences in average population age, ethnic and genetic backgrounds; the stage of the pandemic in each country; and different approaches to mitigating the spread of the disease in different countries. Numerous clinical trials are presently underway to determine whether BCG vaccination reduces the incidence and severity of COVID-19 in health-care workers and older individuals (Supplementary Table). A trial has also started in Egypt (NCT04347876), where disease severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19 will be compared between those with positive and negative tuberculin tests. In Brazil, the BCG vaccine will be given to patients with COVID-19 as a therapeutic vaccine to evaluate the impact on the rate of elimination of SARS-CoV-2, the clinical evolution of COVID-19 and the seroconversion rate and titres of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. As the BCG vaccine has been administered to most neonates in South Africa and France until recently, these trials will also investigate the effect of revaccination with the BCG vaccine. In addition, a new modified version of BCG, namely VPM1002, which expresses listeriolysin instead of urease C, will be tested in health-care workers and older individuals in Germany111. Securing a reliable supply of BCG vaccine doses could be a challenge in Africa if re-immunization shows promise, as there is limited manufacturing capacity for the vaccine on the continent. Historically, shortages of the vaccines were documented in 41% of countries on the continent between 2005 and 2015 (ref.112). This was largely due to lack of supply, but the limited availability of financing, procurement shortcomings and ineffective vaccine management also contributed to the shortage. The low price for a BCG vaccine and limited investment has also reduced the incentive for manufacturers to redesign and improve production processes in the region. From 1988 to 2001, the 172-Tokyo BCG strain was produced at the State Vaccine Institute in Cape Town, South Africa; however, this was discontinued as the cost of importing the vaccine was lower than that of local manufacture.

The potential impact of co-infections

Africa shoulders a considerable burden of co-infections. Although HIV-1 and tuberculosis may be the most important infections when considering potentially enhanced COVID-19 disease severity, the high incidence of malaria and helminth infections as well as multiple ongoing outbreaks of Ebola virus disease, Lassa fever, cholera, measles, yellow fever, hepatitis E and chikungunya virus113 all represent infections with unknown interactions with SARS-CoV-2.

The high prevalence of HIV-1 and tuberculosis in sub-Saharan Africa presents an important but largely unknown challenge for the continent with regard to COVID-19. The urgent question that needs answering is whether individuals with HIV-1, or those with past or current tuberculosis, have a higher risk of infection or greater morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. Of the 37.9 million people living with HIV-1 globally, 25.6 million live in sub-Saharan Africa, and it is estimated that 64% are accessing antiretroviral therapy and 54% are virally suppressed114. Although individuals who are immunocompetent with well-controlled HIV-1 infections may be at no greater risk for COVID-19, there remains a considerable number of individuals with low CD4 counts and uncontrolled HIV-1 viraemia who may be at risk of severe disease. To date, there have been two published reports of concurrent COVID-19 and HIV-1 infection115,116. Although the cohort was an extremely limited group of patients predominantly established on antiretroviral therapy, the pattern of clinical disease did not differ from that observed in the general population, but more research is needed to confirm this result.

The severity of other respiratory infections concomitant with HIV-1 may provide some clues: although the immunopathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 is probably distinct in several aspects from influenza viruses, there are some shared clinical features. HIV-1 infection is associated with a greater susceptibility to influenza virus infection, increased severity of influenza-related disease and poorer prognosis in patients who are severely immunocompromised117. A large South African study observed an eightfold higher incidence of influenza virus infection and a fourfold greater risk of death in the case of HIV-1 co-infection118. Paradoxically, there is also evidence that lower inflammatory responses in individuals who are immunocompetent and infected with HIV-1 may lead to milder influenza-related disease117. In addition to altering the clinical course of disease, HIV-1 infections may result in poorer antibody responses that may lead to prolonged viral shedding, thereby influencing disease transmission119. Tuberculosis, a disease that causes chronic lung damage, may also present a challenge in the COVID-19 era. There were approximately 2.4 million new cases of tuberculosis in Africa in 2018 (ref.120). In a South African study of patients who were hospitalized for severe respiratory illness, those with influenza virus infection together with laboratory-confirmed tuberculosis had a 4.5-fold greater risk of death121. HIV-1 largely drives the tuberculosis epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa, and the ‘triple-hit’ of HIV-1, tuberculosis and SARS-CoV-2 infection is consequently of considerable concern.

A preliminary study suggests that HIV-1 infection increases the risk of mortality from COVID-19 by 2.39-fold, and this increased risk seemed to be independent of suppressed HIV-1 viral load due to antiretroviral therapy. Individuals with current tuberculosis had a 2.7-fold greater risk of death122. These figures represent a modest increased risk compared with older age and co-morbidities such as diabetes in the same population, which suggests that HIV-1 and tuberculosis may not be considered major risk factors for COVID-19. Although this would be considered good news, further studies are awaited to confirm these initial observations.

The two main potential issues for using SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in individuals infected with HIV-1 are safety and efficacy. However, potential safety issues are likely to be restricted to use of certain vaccine modalities, such as live-attenuated or replicating vaccines, in individuals who are highly immunosuppressed. When considering vaccine efficacy, the magnitude and durability of immunity in individuals infected with HIV-1 for both vaccination against and natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 is unknown. To date, there are no reports describing immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in individuals infected with HIV-1. It is possible that individuals with HIV-1 may have incomplete immune reconstitution and impaired immunity that may influence vaccine safety and efficacy, even if they are receiving antiretroviral therapy, owing to persistent immune activation and incomplete recovery of T cell and B cell immunity123,124. Suboptimal neutralizing antibody responses have been described following immunization against influenza virus or other pathogens in individuals infected with HIV-1 (ref.125). Weaker antibody responses and lower influenza virus-specific memory B cell responses in individuals infected with HIV-1 were directly related to CD4 counts126. It will be important to test candidate vaccines for their ability to generate immune responses in a range of high-risk groups, including patients with HIV-1. Several strategies may improve the magnitude and durability of vaccine responses in individuals infected with HIV-1, such as higher doses, booster immunizations and/or the use of adjuvants127. Substantive data on the clinical and immunological interaction of HIV-1, tuberculosis and COVID-19 will emerge from Africa in time for improved strategies to guide clinical management of patients who are co-infected and the vaccine regimens.

Finally, an important additional point to note is the indirect effects of COVID-19 on health in Africa within the setting of a high burden of infectious diseases. The WHO estimates that the disruption in vaccination due to disruption in supply could put 80 million infants at risk of contracting vaccine-preventable diseases128. Several countries have reported reduced uptake of tuberculosis testing, and patients failing to collect tuberculosis medication or antiretroviral therapy owing to overwhelmed health-care systems, lockdown interventions and public fear of contracting COVID-19 (ref.129). Mitigating these interruptions in prevention, diagnosis and treatment, and ensuring that essential health services continue, will ultimately lower the overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa.

Conclusions and outlook

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic presents an unprecedented global humanitarian and medical challenge. Although this has prompted unparalleled progress in the development of vaccines and therapeutics in many countries, it has also highlighted the vulnerability of resource-limited countries in Africa. Not only do these countries have limited testing capacity but the infrastructure to manufacture tests, vaccines and therapeutic drugs is largely absent, and few clinical trials are underway on the continent to combat SARS-CoV-2. Clearly, there is an urgent need for capacity development and the available resources should focus on solutions that are specific to the needs of the continent. For example, there is an urgent need to inexpensively manufacture viral antigens for serological testing: this will determine the seroprevalence of the virus where PCR-based testing is not available for mild infections. Therapeutics development should focus on repurposing existing drugs, or using convalescent plasma that can rapidly be used to treat infection and could be prioritized for individuals who are at high risk. Appropriate manufacturing partnerships need to be established to produce vaccines that could be tested and licensed on the continent, to limit reliance on global initiatives that may be overwhelmed by the global demand for a vaccine. In fact, this may present an opportunity for governments to finally invest in much-needed cGMP-compliant vaccine manufacturing facilities. Although the situation is unquestionably dire, Africa has an important role in the global fight against COVID-19, and the resilience and resourcefulness of the people are not to be underestimated.


  1. 1.

    Su, S. et al. Epidemiology, genetic recombination, and pathogenesis of coronaviruses. Trends Microbiol. 24, 490–502 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Drosten, C. et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1967–1976 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zaki, A. M., van Boheemen, S., Bestebroer, T. M., Osterhaus, A. D. & Fouchier, R. A. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 1814–1820 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zhu, N. et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 727–733 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chen, N. et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 395, 507–513 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dong, E., Du, H. & Gardner, L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, 533–534 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhou, P. et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579, 270–273 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhang, T., Wu, Q. & Zhang, Z. Probable pangolin origin of SARS-CoV-2 associated with the COVID-19 outbreak. Curr. Biol. 30, 1346–1351 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Li, X. et al. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 through recombination and strong purifying selection. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb9153 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yang, X. et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir. Med. 8, 475–481 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Guan, W. J. et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1708–1720 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Li, J. et al. COVID-19 infection may cause ketosis and ketoacidosis. Diabetes Obes. Metab. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Palermo, N. E., Sadhu, A. R. & McDonnell, M. E. Diabetic ketoacidosis in COVID-19: unique concerns and considerations. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    International Diabetes Foundation. IDF Africa. IDF (2019).

  15. 15.

    Varatharaj, A. et al. Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19 in 153 patients: a UK-wide surveillance study. Lancet Psychiat. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Riphagen, S., Gomez, X., Gonzalez-Martinez, C., Wilkinson, N. & Theocharis, P. Hyperinflammatory shock in children during COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 395, 1607–1608 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Viner, R. M. & Whittaker, E. Kawasaki-like disease: emerging complication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 395, 1741–1743 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lu, X. et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1663–1665 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chinazzi, M. et al. The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. Science (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nkengasong, J. N. & Mankoula, W. Looming threat of COVID-19 infection in Africa: act collectively, and fast. Lancet (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    World Health Organization. Hospital beds (per 10 000 population). WHO (2020).

  22. 22.

    Thornton, J. Covid-19: keep essential malaria services going during pandemic, urges WHO. BMJ 369, m1637 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Basson, A. Zimbabwe under strain as Malaria cases surge during COVID-19 fight. news24 (2020).

  24. 24.

    Li, R. et al. Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV2). Science 368, 489-493 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Our World in Data. Coronavirus (COVID-19) testing. Global Change Data Lab (2020).

  26. 26.

    Saglietto, A., D’Ascenzo, F., Zoccai, G. B. & De Ferrari, G. M. COVID-19 in Europe: the Italian lesson. Lancet 395, 1110–1111 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hellewell, J. et al. Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. Lancet Glob. Health 8, e488–e496 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mendelson, M. & Madhi, S. South Africa’s coronavirus testing strategy is broken and not fit for purpose: it’s time for a change. SAMJ 110, 429–431 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Nkengasong, J. Let Africa into the market for COVID-19 diagnostics. Nature 580, 565 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Corman, V. M. et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    The Guardian (international edition). African countries unite to create ‘one stop shop’ to lower cost of Covid-19 tests and PPE. The Guardian (2020).

  32. 32.

    Madhi, S. A. et al. COVID-19 lockdowns in low- and middle-income countries: success against COVID-19 at the price of greater costs. SAMJ 110, 724–726 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Fomsgaard, A. S. & Rosenstierne, M. W. An alternative workflow for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 – escape from the NA extraction kit-shortage, Copenhagen, Denmark, March 2020. Eurosurveillance 25, 2000398 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Broughton, J. P. et al. CRISPR–Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 870–874 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Long, Q. X. et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 845–848 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Deeks, J. J. et al. Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Staines, H. M. et al. Dynamics of IgG seroconversion and pathophysiology of COVID-19 infections. Preprint at medRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ibarrondo, F. J. et al. Rapid decay of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in persons with mild COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Stadlbauer, D. et al. SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans: a detailed protocol for a serological assay, antigen production, and test setup. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 57, e100 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Okba, N. M. A. et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibody responses in coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Emerg. Infect. Dis. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lassaunière, R. et al. Evaluation of nine commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays. Preprint at medRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Petherick, A. Developing antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2. Lancet 395, 1101–1102 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Premkumar, L. et al. The receptor binding domain of the viral spike protein is an immunodominant and highly specific target of antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 patients. Sci. Immunol. 5, eabc8413 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Atkinson, R., Burt, F., Rybicki, E. P. & Meyers, A. E. Plant-produced Crimean–Congo haemorrhagic fever virus nucleoprotein for use in indirect ELISA. J. Virol. Methods 236, 170–177 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Mbewana, S. et al. Expression of Rift Valley fever virus N-protein in Nicotiana benthamiana for use as a diagnostic antigen. BMC Biotechnol. 18, 77 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Han, X. et al. The expression of SARS-CoV M gene in P. Pastoris and the diagnostic utility of the expression product. J. Virol. Methods 122, 105–111 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Margolin, E. et al. Co-expression of human calreticulin significantly improves the production of HIV gp140 and other viral glycoproteins in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Amanat, F. & Krammer, F. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: status report. Immunity 52, 583–589 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Gordon, D. E. et al. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature 583, 459–468 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Beigel, J. H. et al. Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 — preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Group, R. C. et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 – preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Gautret, P. et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 56, 105949 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Mehra, M. R., Ruschitzka, F. & Patel, A. N. Retraction-Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis. Lancet 395, 1820 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    University of Oxford. No clinical benefit from use of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Nuffield Department of Population Health (2020).

  55. 55.

    World Health Organization. “Solidarity” clinical trial for COVID-19 treatments. WHO (2020).

  56. 56.

    Maisonnasse, P. et al. Hydroxychloroquine use against SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-human primates. Nature (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    World Health Organization Guidance for Managing Ethical Issues in Infectious Disease Outbreaks (WHO Press, 2016).

  58. 58.

    Kupferschmidt, K. & Cohen, J. Race to find COVID-19 treatments accelerates. Science 367, 1412–1413 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Duan, K. et al. Effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9490–9496 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Bloch, E. M. et al. Deployment of convalescent plasma for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. J. Clin. Invest. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Wu, F. et al. Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in a COVID-19 recovered patient cohort and their implications. Preprint at medRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ju, B. et al. Human neutralizing antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nature 584, 115–119 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Xu, X. et al. Effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 10970–10975 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Stebbing, J. et al. COVID-19: combining antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatments. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, 400–402 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News. Phase III trial to study combination of Genentech’s actemra, Gilead’s remdesivir versus severe COVID-19. Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News (2020).

  66. 66.

    George, P. M., Wells, A. U. & Jenkins, R. G. Pulmonary fibrosis and COVID-19: the potential role for antifibrotic therapy. Lancet Respir. Med. 8, 807–815 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Jin, Z. et al. Structure of Mpro from COVID-19 virus and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature 582, 289–293 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Mortimer, E. et al. Setting up a platform for plant-based influenza virus vaccine production in South Africa. BMC Biotechnol. 12, 14 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Thanh Le, T. et al. The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 305–306 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Mullard, A. COVID-19 vaccine development pipeline gears up. Lancet 395, 1751–1752 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Zhu, F. C. et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine: a dose-escalation, open-label, non-randomised, first-in-human trial. Lancet 395, 1845–1854 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Gray, G. E. et al. Subtype C gp140 vaccine boosts immune responses primed by the South African AIDS Vaccine Initiative DNA-C2 and MVA-C HIV vaccines after more than a 2-year gap. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 23, 496–506 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Roussi, A. & Maxmen, A. African nations missing from coronavirus trials. Nature (2020).

  74. 74.

    Graham, B. S., Mascola, J. R. & Fauci, A. S. Novel vaccine technologies: essential components of an adequate response to emerging viral diseases. JAMA 319, 1431–1432 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Rauch, S., Jasny, E., Schmidt, K. E. & Petsch, B. New vaccine technologies to combat outbreak situations. Front. Immunol. 9, 1963 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Smith, T. R. F. et al. Immunogenicity of a DNA vaccine candidate for COVID-19. Nat. Commun. 11, 2601 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Yu, J. et al. DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Science 369, 806–811 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Sanchez-Sampedro, L. et al. The evolution of poxvirus vaccines. Viruses 7, 1726–1803 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Ewer, K. et al. Chimpanzee adenoviral vectors as vaccines for outbreak pathogens. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 13, 3020–3032 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Doremalen, N. versus et al. A single dose of ChAdOx1 MERS provides protective immunity in rhesus macaques. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba8399 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    van Doremalen, N. et al. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques. Nature (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Nagata, L. P., Irwin, C. R., Hu, W. & Evans, D. H. Vaccinia-based vaccines to biothreat and emerging viruses. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 34, 107–121 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Mayr, A., Stickl, H., Muller, H. K., Danner, K. & Singer, H. [The smallpox vaccination strain MVA: marker, genetic structure, experience gained with the parenteral vaccination and behavior in organisms with a debilitated defence mechanism (author’s transl.)]. Zentralbl Bakteriol. B 167, 375–390 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Gomez, C. E., Najera, J. L., Krupa, M. & Esteban, M. The poxvirus vectors MVA and NYVAC as gene delivery systems for vaccination against infectious diseases and cancer. Curr. Gene Ther. 8, 97–120 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Taylor, J. et al. Applications of canarypox (ALVAC) vectors in human and veterinary vaccination. Dev. Biol. Stand. 82, 131–135 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Skinner, M. A., Laidlaw, S. M., Eldaghayes, I., Kaiser, P. & Cottingham, M. G. Fowlpox virus as a recombinant vaccine vector for use in mammals and poultry. Expert Rev. Vaccines 4, 63–76 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Aspden, K. et al. Immunogenicity of a recombinant lumpy skin disease virus (neethling vaccine strain) expressing the rabies virus glycoprotein in cattle. Vaccine 20, 2693–2701 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Mayr, A. & Danner, K. Vaccination against pox diseases under immunosuppressive conditions. Dev. Biol. Stand. 41, 225–234 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Pittman, P. R. et al. Phase 3 efficacy trial of modified vaccinia ankara as a vaccine against smallpox. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 1897–1908 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Tartaglia, J. et al. NYVAC: a highly attenuated strain of vaccinia virus. Virology 188, 217–232 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Hanke, T. Aiming for protective T cell responses: a focus on the first generation conserved-region HIVconsv vaccines in preventive and therapeutic clinical trials. Expert Rev. Vaccines 18, 1029–1041 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Scriba, T. J. et al. A phase IIa trial of the new tuberculosis vaccine, MVA85A, in HIV- and/or Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected adults. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 185, 769–778 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Mutua, G. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a 2-dose heterologous vaccine regimen with Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccines: 12-month data from a phase 1 randomized clinical trial in Nairobi, Kenya. J. Infect. Dis. 220, 57–67 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Tuppurainen, E. S. M. et al. Review: Capripoxvirus diseases: current status and opportunities for control. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 64, 729–745 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Aspden, K., Passmore, J. A., Tiedt, F. & Williamson, A. L. Evaluation of lumpy skin disease virus, a capripoxvirus, as a replication-deficient vaccine vector. J. Gen. Virol. 84, 1985–1996 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Shen, Y. J. et al. A novel candidate HIV vaccine vector based on the replication deficient capripoxvirus, lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV). Virol. J. 8, 265 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Poulet, H. et al. Development and registration of recombinant veterinary vaccines. The example of the canarypox vector platform. Vaccine 25, 5606–5612 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Murad, S. et al. Molecular pharming for low and middle income countries. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 61, 53–59 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Peyret, H. & Lomonossoff, G. P. When plant virology met agrobacterium: the rise of the deconstructed clones. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 13, 1121–1135 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Margolin, E. et al. Calreticulin co-expression supports high level production of a recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike mimetic in Nicotiana benthamiana. bioRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    D’Aoust, M. A. et al. The production of hemagglutinin-based virus-like particles in plants: a rapid, efficient and safe response to pandemic influenza. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 8, 607–619 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    RT. DARPA’s Blue Angel — Pentagon prepares millions of vaccines against future global flu. RT News (2012).

  103. 103.

    Miller, A. et al. Correlation between universal BCG vaccination policy and reduced morbidity and mortality for COVID-19: an epidemiological study. Preprint at medRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Dayal, D. & Gupta, S. Connecting BCG vaccination and COVID-19: additional data. Preprint at medRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Shet, A., Ray, D., Malavige, N., Santosham, M. & Bar-Zeev, N. Differential COVID-19-attributable mortality and BCG vaccine use in countries. Preprint at medRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Sala, G. & Miyakawa, T. Association of BCG vaccination policy with prevalence and mortality of COVID-19. Preprint at medRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Abubakar, I. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence on the duration of protection by bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccination against tuberculosis. Health Technol. Assess. (2013).

  108. 108.

    Colditz, G. A. et al. The efficacy of bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination of newborns and infants in the prevention of tuberculosis: meta-analyses of the published literature. Pediatrics 96, 29–35 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Moorlag, S., Arts, R. J. W., van Crevel, R. & Netea, M. G. Non-specific effects of BCG vaccine on viral infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 25, 1473–1478 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Covian, C. et al. BCG-induced cross-protection and development of trained immunity: implication for vaccine design. Front. Immunol. 10, 2806 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Loxton, A. G. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine VPM1002 in HIV-unexposed newborn infants in South Africa. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 24, e00439-16 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Cernuschi, T., Malvolti, S., Nickels, E. & Friede, M. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine: a global assessment of demand and supply balance. Vaccine 36, 498–506 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    WHO Africa. Outbreaks and emergencies bulletin. WHO (2020).

  114. 114.

    UNAIDS. UNAIDS data 2019 (2020).

  115. 115.

    Blanco, J. L. et al. COVID-19 in patients with HIV: clinical case series. Lancet HIV 7, E314–E316 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Zhu, F., Cao, Y., Xu, S. & Zhou, M. Co-infection of SARS-CoV-2 and HIV in a patient in Wuhan city, China. J. Med. Virol. 92, 529–530 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Gonzalez Alvarez, D. A., Lopez Cortes, L. F. & Cordero, E. Impact of HIV on the severity of influenza. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 10, 463–472 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Cohen, C. et al. Severe influenza-associated respiratory infection in high HIV prevalence setting, South Africa, 2009–2011. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 19, 1766–1774 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    von Mollendorf, C. et al. Influenza viral shedding in a prospective cohort of HIV-infected and uninfected children and adults in 2 provinces of South Africa, 2012–2014. J. Infect. Dis. 218, 1228–1237 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    WHO. Global tuberculosis report 2019 (2020).

  121. 121.

    Walaza, S. et al. The impact of influenza and tuberculosis interaction on mortality among individuals aged ≥15 years hospitalized with severe respiratory illness in South Africa, 2010–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, ofz020 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Davies, M. A. HIV and risk of COVID-19 death: a population cohort study from the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Preprint at medRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Tanko, R. F. et al. Effect of antiretroviral therapy on the memory and activation profiles of B cells in HIV-infected African women. J. Immunol. 198, 1220–1228 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Tanko, R. F. et al. Residual T cell activation and skewed CD8+ T cell memory differentiation despite antiretroviral therapy-induced HIV suppression. Clin. Immunol. 195, 127–138 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Geretti, A. M. & Doyle, T. Immunization for HIV-positive individuals. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 23, 32–38 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Malaspina, A. et al. Compromised B cell responses to influenza vaccination in HIV-infected individuals. J. Infect. Dis. 191, 1442–1450 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Crum-Cianflone, N. F. & Wallace, M. R. Vaccination in HIV-infected adults. AIDS Patient Care STDS 28, 397–410 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    WHO. At least 80 million children under one at risk of diseases such as diphtheria, measles and polio as COVID-19 disrupts routine vaccination efforts, warn Gavi, WHO and UNICEF. WHO (2020).

  129. 129.

    Hogan, A. et al. Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study. Lancet Glob. Health 8, e1132–e1141 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Triplett, M. Evidence that higher temperatures are associated with lower incidence of COVID-19 in pandemic state, cumulative cases reported up to March 27, 2020. Preprint at medRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Scafetta, N. Distribution of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and its monthly forecast based on seasonal climate patterns. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 3493 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Alvarez-Ramirez Sr, J. & Meraz, M. Role of meteorological temperature and relative humidity in the January–February 2020 propagation of 2019-nCoV in Wuhan, China. Preprint at medRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Peiris, J. S. et al. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361, 1319–1325 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Carlson, C. J., Chipperfield, J. D., Benito, B. M., Telford, R. J. & O’Hara, R. B. Species distribution models are inappropriate for COVID-19. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 770–771 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Harbert, R. S., Cunningham, S. W. & Tessler, M. Spatial modeling cannot currently differentiate SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and human distributions on the basis of climate in the United States. Preprint at medRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Moriyama, M., Hugentobler, W. J. & Iwasaki, A. Seasonality of respiratory viral infections. Annu. Rev. Virol. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    van Doremalen, N., Bushmaker, T. & Munster, V. J. Stability of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) under different environmental conditions. Euro Surveill. (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Chan, K. H. et al. The effects of temperature and relative humidity on the viability of the SARS coronavirus. Adv. Virol. 2011, 734690 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Shaman, J., Pitzer, V. E., Viboud, C., Grenfell, B. T. & Lipsitch, M. Absolute humidity and the seasonal onset of influenza in the continental United States. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000316 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Baker, R. E. et al. Epidemic dynamics of respiratory syncytial virus in current and future climates. Nat. Commun. 10, 5512 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Gaunt, E. R., Hardie, A., Claas, E. C., Simmonds, P. & Templeton, K. E. Epidemiology and clinical presentations of the four human coronaviruses 229E, HKU1, NL63, and OC43 detected over 3 years using a novel multiplex real-time PCR method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48, 2940–2947 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Assiri, A. et al. Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 47 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease from Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 13, 752–761 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Chinese, S. M. E. C. Molecular evolution of the SARS coronavirus during the course of the SARS epidemic in China. Science 303, 1666–1669 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Anderson, R. M. et al. Epidemiology, transmission dynamics and control of SARS: the 2002–2003 epidemic. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359, 1091–1105 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Wrapp, D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367, 1260–1263 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Walls, A. C. et al. Tectonic conformational changes of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein promote membrane fusion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11157–11162 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Yang, Z. Y. et al. A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice. Nature 428, 561–564 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Wang, L. et al. Evaluation of candidate vaccine approaches for MERS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 6, 7712 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Yang, L. et al. Persistent memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in recovered severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) patients to SARS coronavirus M antigen. J. Gen. Virol. 88, 2740–2748 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Peng, H. et al. Human memory T cell responses to SARS-CoV E protein. Microbes Infect. 8, 2424–2431 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Peng, H. et al. Long-lived memory T lymphocyte responses against SARS coronavirus nucleocapsid protein in SARS-recovered patients. Virology 351, 466–475 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Newton, A. H., Cardani, A. & Braciale, T. J. The host immune response in respiratory virus infection: balancing virus clearance and immunopathology. Semin. Immunopathol. 38, 471–482 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Channappanavar, R., Fett, C., Zhao, J., Meyerholz, D. K. & Perlman, S. Virus-specific memory CD8 T cells provide substantial protection from lethal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J. Virol. 88, 11034–11044 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Cao, W. C., Liu, W., Zhang, P. H., Zhang, F. & Richardus, J. H. Disappearance of antibodies to SARS-associated coronavirus after recovery. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 1162–1163 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Liu, W. et al. Two-year prospective study of the humoral immune response of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. J. Infect. Dis. 193, 792–795 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Lan, L. et al. Positive RT-PCR test results in patients recovered from COVID-19. JAMA 323, 1502–1503 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Deng, W. et al. Primary exposure to SARS-CoV-2 protects against reinfection in rhesus macaques. Science 369, 818–823 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Tseng, C. T. et al. Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS ONE 7, e35421 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Agrawal, A. S. et al. Immunization with inactivated Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine leads to lung immunopathology on challenge with live virus. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 12, 2351–2356 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Bolles, M. et al. A double-inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine provides incomplete protection in mice and induces increased eosinophilic proinflammatory pulmonary response upon challenge. J. Virol. 85, 12201–12215 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Wan, Y. et al. Molecular mechanism for antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus entry. J. Virol. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Ricke, D. O. & Malone, R. W. Medical countermeasures analysis of 2019-nCoV and vaccine risks for antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Preprints (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors acknowledge support from the South African Medical Research Council with funds received from the South African Department of Science and Technology, core funding from the Wellcome Trust (203135/Z/16/Z) and funding from the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation (Grant Number 64815).

Author information




The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Emmanuel Margolin or Edward P. Rybicki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Microbiology thanks M. Baylis, G. Dougan, S. Jiang and L. F. P. Ng for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Africa CDC:

Africa Medical Supplies Platform:

Cape Bio Pharms:

Drug Discovery and Development Centre:



The Biologicals and Vaccines Institute of Southern Africa:

World Health Data Platform:

Supplementary information


Index cases

The first documented cases in a disease outbreak.

Kawasaki disease

A rare condition associated with inflammation in blood vessels that most commonly presents in children under 5 years of age.

Serology-based testing

A diagnostic test that measures the presence of antibodies in blood to determine exposure to pathogens or to diagnosis autoimmune diseases.

Convalescent sera

Sera obtained from individuals who have recovered from an infectious disease and contain antibodies against the pathogen.

Cytokine storm

A disproportionately large cytokine response that promotes inflammation and is harmful to the host.

Tuberculin tests

Tuberculosis diagnostic tests that involve the intradermal injection of bacterial antigens to determine whether the recipient mounts an immune response at the site of injection.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Margolin, E., Burgers, W.A., Sturrock, E.D. et al. Prospects for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines in Africa. Nat Rev Microbiol 18, 690–704 (2020).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing