Microorganisms have evolved to thrive in virtually any terrestrial and marine environment, exposing them to various mechanical cues mainly generated by fluid flow and pressure as well as surface contact. Cellular components enable bacteria to sense and respond to physical cues to optimize their function, ultimately improving bacterial fitness. Owing to newly developed biophysical techniques, we are now starting to appreciate the breadth of bacterial phenotypes influenced by mechanical inputs: adhesion, motility, biofilm formation and pathogenicity. In this Review, we discuss how microbiology and biophysics are converging to advance our understanding of the mechanobiology of microorganisms. We first review the various physical forces that bacteria experience in their natural environments and describe the structures that transmit these forces to a cell. We then discuss how forces can provide feedback to enhance adhesion and motility and how they can be transduced by dedicated cellular machinery to regulate diverse phenotypes. Finally, we provide a perspective on how mechanics influence biofilm spatial organization and homeostasis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
High-force catch bonds between the Staphylococcus aureus surface protein SdrE and complement regulator factor H drive immune evasion
Communications Biology Open Access 21 March 2023
Fibronectin binding protein B binds to loricrin and promotes corneocyte adhesion by Staphylococcus aureus
Nature Communications Open Access 06 May 2022
An ester bond underlies the mechanical strength of a pathogen surface protein
Nature Communications Open Access 23 August 2021
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 per month
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Zhu, T. F. & Szostak, J. W. Coupled growth and division of model protocell membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 5705–5713 (2009).
Dupont, S. et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474, 179–183 (2011).
Persat, A. et al. The mechanical world of bacteria. Cell 161, 988–997 (2015).
Bartlett, D. H. Pressure effects on in vivo microbial processes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1595, 367–381 (2002).
Berne, C., Ellison, C. K., Ducret, A. & Brun, Y. V. Bacterial adhesion at the single-cell level. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 616–627 (2018).
Auer, G. K. & Weibel, D. B. Bacterial cell mechanics. Biochemistry 56, 3710–3724 (2017).
Rojas, E. R. et al. The outer membrane is an essential load-bearing element in Gram-negative bacteria. Nature 559, 617–621 (2018).
Chen, Y., Norde, W., van der Mei, H. C. & Busscher, H. J. Bacterial cell surface deformation under external loading. MBio https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00378-12 (2012).
Li, J. et al. Residence-time dependent cell wall deformation of different Staphylococcus aureus strains on gold measured using surface-enhanced-fluorescence. Soft Matter 10, 7638–7646 (2014).
Lauga, E. & Powers, T. R. The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms. Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 096601 (2009). A thorough review on the fluid mechanics involved in swimming motility.
Purcell, E. M. Life at low Reynolds number. Am. J. Phys. 45, 3–11 (1977).
Subramanian, S. & Kearns, D. B. Functional regulators of bacterial flagella. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 73, 225–246 (2019).
Lele, P. P., Hosu, B. G. & Berg, H. C. Dynamics of mechanosensing in the bacterial flagellar motor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11839–11844 (2013). This paper demonstrates how the E. coli flagellum motor adapts its rotation rate upon changes in torque load by recruiting stator units.
Tipping, M. J., Delalez, N. J., Lim, R., Berry, R. M. & Armitage, J. P. Load-dependent assembly of the bacterial flagellar motor. MBio https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00551-13 (2013). This paper shows that increasing loads on the flagellum motor increase torque generation by recruiting stator units.
Wadhwa, N., Phillips, R. & Berg, H. C. Torque-dependent remodeling of the bacterial flagellar motor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11764–11769 (2019). This study combines biophysical experimentation and theory to understand how load changes drive the assembly/disassembly of the flagellum motor.
Nord, A. L. et al. Catch bond drives stator mechanosensitivity in the bacterial flagellar motor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 12952–12957 (2017). A demonstration that a catch bond mechanism drives the torque-dependent recruitment of additional flagellum stators.
Darnton, N. C. & Berg, H. C. Force-extension measurements on bacterial flagella: triggering polymorphic transformations. Biophys. J. 92, 2230–2236 (2007).
Kühn, M. J., Schmidt, F. K., Eckhardt, B. & Thormann, K. M. Bacteria exploit a polymorphic instability of the flagellar filament to escape from traps. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6340–6345 (2017).
Kühn, M. J. et al. Spatial arrangement of several flagellins within bacterial flagella improves motility in different environments. Nat. Commun. 9, 5369 (2018).
Toutain, C. M., Zegans, M. E. & O’Toole, G. A. Evidence for two flagellar stators and their role in the motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 187, 771–777 (2005).
Doyle, T. B., Hawkins, A. C. & McCarter, L. L. The complex flagellar torque generator of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 186, 6341–6350 (2004).
Belas, R. Biofilms, flagella, and mechanosensing of surfaces by bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 22, 517–527 (2014).
Alexandre, G., Rohr, R. & Bally, R. A phase variant of Azospirillum lipoferum lacks a polar flagellum and constitutively expresses mechanosensing lateral flagella. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 4701–4704 (1999).
Khammas, K. M., Ageron, E., Grimont, P. A. D. & Kaiser, P. Azospirillum irakense sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with rice roots and rhizosphere soil. Res. Microbiol. 140, 679–693 (1989).
Meganathan, R. & Marquis, R. E. Loss of bacterial motility under pressure. Nature 246, 525–527 (1973).
Eloe, E. A., Lauro, F. M., Vogel, R. F. & Bartlett, D. H. The deep-sea bacterium Photobacterium profundum ss9 utilizes separate flagellar systems for swimming and swarming under high-pressure conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 6298–6305 (2008).
Wang, F. et al. Environmental adaptation: genomic analysis of the piezotolerant and psychrotolerant deep-sea iron reducing bacterium Shewanella piezotolerans WP3. PLoS One 3, e1937 (2008).
Mattick, J. S. Type IV pili and twitching motility. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56, 289–314 (2002).
Denise, R., Abby, S. S. & Rocha, E. P. C. Diversification of the type IV filament superfamily into machines for adhesion, protein secretion, DNA uptake, and motility. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000390 (2019).
Burrows, L. L. Pseudomonas aeruginosa twitching motility: type IV pili in action. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 66, 493–520 (2012).
Talà, L., Fineberg, A., Kukura, P. & Persat, A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa orchestrates twitching motility by sequential control of type IV pili movements. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 774–780 (2019). A demonstration that P. aeruginosa coordinate T4P retraction with contact of their tip with a surface.
Beaussart, A. et al. Nanoscale adhesion forces of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type IV pili. ACS Nano 8, 10723–10733 (2014). This paper suggests that stretching with AFM can induce conformational changes in T4P.
Biais, N., Higashi, D. L., Brujic, J., So, M. & Sheetz, M. P. Force-dependent polymorphism in type IV pili reveals hidden epitopes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11358–11363 (2010).
Ellison, C. K. et al. Obstruction of pilus retraction stimulates bacterial surface sensing. Science 358, 535–538 (2017). This paper demonstrates that C. crescentus pili mechanosense surfaces to regulate deployment of polar adhesins.
Ellison, C. K. et al. Retraction of DNA-bound type IV competence pili initiates DNA uptake during natural transformation in Vibrio cholerae. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 773–780 (2018).
Adams, D. W., Stutzmann, S., Stoudmann, C. & Blokesch, M. DNA-uptake pili of Vibrio cholerae are required for chitin colonization and capable of kin recognition via sequence-specific self-interaction. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1545–1557 (2019).
Turner, K. H., Everett, J., Trivedi, U., Rumbaugh, K. P. & Whiteley, M. Requirements for Pseudomonas aeruginosa acute burn and chronic surgical wound infection. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004518 (2014).
Kang, P. J. et al. Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa genes required for epithelial cell injury. Mol. Microbiol. 24, 1249–1262 (1997).
Fuente, L. D. L. et al. Assessing adhesion forces of type I and type IV Pili of Xylella fastidiosa bacteria by use of a microfluidic flow chamber. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 2690–2696 (2007).
Meng, Y. et al. Upstream migration of Xylella fastidiosa via pilus-driven twitching motility. J. Bacteriol. 187, 5560–5567 (2005).
Chlebek, J. L. et al. PilT and PilU are homohexameric ATPases that coordinate to retract type IVa pili. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008448 (2019).
Faure, L. M. et al. The mechanism of force transmission at bacterial focal adhesion complexes. Nature 539, 530–535 (2016).
Pizarro-Cerdá, J. & Cossart, P. Bacterial adhesion and entry into host cells. Cell 124, 715–727 (2006).
Müller, D. J., Helenius, J., Alsteens, D. & Dufrêne, Y. F. Force probing surfaces of living cells to molecular resolution. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 383–390 (2009).
Marszalek, P. E. & Dufrêne, Y. F. Stretching single polysaccharides and proteins using atomic force microscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 3523–3534 (2012).
El-Kirat-Chatel, S., Beaussart, A., Boyd, C. D., O’Toole, G. A. & Dufrêne, Y. F. Single-cell and single-molecule analysis deciphers the localization, adhesion, and mechanics of the biofilm adhesin LapA. ACS Chem. Biol. 9, 485–494 (2014).
Formosa-Dague, C., Speziale, P., Foster, T. J., Geoghegan, J. A. & Dufrêne, Y. F. Zinc-dependent mechanical properties of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-forming surface protein SasG. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 410–415 (2016).
Alsteens, D., Garcia, M. C., Lipke, P. N. & Dufrêne, Y. F. Force-induced formation and propagation of adhesion nanodomains in living fungal cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20744–20749 (2010).
Larsen, P. et al. Amyloid adhesins are abundant in natural biofilms. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 3077–3090 (2007).
Romero, D., Aguilar, C., Losick, R. & Kolter, R. Amyloid fibers provide structural integrity to Bacillus subtilis biofilms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2230–2234 (2010).
Mandlik, A., Swierczynski, A., Das, A. & Ton-That, H. Pili in Gram-positive bacteria: assembly, involvement in colonization and biofilm development. Trends Microbiol. 16, 33–40 (2008).
Kankainen, M. et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reveals pili containing a human-mucus binding protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 17193–17198 (2009).
Tripathi, P. et al. Adhesion and nanomechanics of pili from the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. ACS Nano 7, 3685–3697 (2013).
Alegre-Cebollada, J., Badilla, C. L. & Fernández, J. M. Isopeptide bonds block the mechanical extension of pili in pathogenic Streptococcus pyogenes. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 11235–11242 (2010).
Kang, H. J., Coulibaly, F., Clow, F., Proft, T. & Baker, E. N. Stabilizing isopeptide bonds revealed in gram-positive bacterial pilus structure. Science 318, 1625–1628 (2007). This paper demonstrates that isopeptide covalent bonds promote the extreme stability of pili from Gram-positive bacteria.
Thomas, W. Catch bonds in adhesion. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10, 39–57 (2008).
Thomas, W. E., Vogel, V. & Sokurenko, E. Biophysics of catch bonds. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 37, 399–416 (2008).
Thomas, W. E., Trintchina, E., Forero, M., Vogel, V. & Sokurenko, E. V. Bacterial adhesion to target cells enhanced by shear force. Cell 109, 913–923 (2002). Demonstrates that flow increases the binding strength of the FimH E. coli adhesin.
Yakovenko, O. et al. FimH forms catch bonds that are enhanced by mechanical force due to allosteric regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 11596–11605 (2008).
Le Trong, I. et al. Structural basis for mechanical force regulation of the adhesin FimH via finger trap-like β sheet twisting. Cell 141, 645–655 (2010).
Kerrigan, S. W. et al. Molecular basis for Staphylococcus aureus-mediated platelet aggregate formation under arterial shear in vitro. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 28, 335–340 (2008).
Milles, L. F., Schulten, K., Gaub, H. E. & Bernardi, R. C. Molecular mechanism of extreme mechanostability in a pathogen adhesin. Science 359, 1527–1533 (2018). This paper identifies the structural rearrangement in the SdrG adhesin that drives its ability to withstand nanonewton-range forces.
Herman, P. et al. The binding force of the staphylococcal adhesin SdrG is remarkably strong. Mol. Microbiol. 93, 356–368 (2014).
Herman-Bausier, P. et al. Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor A is a force-sensitive molecular switch that activates bacterial adhesion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5564–5569 (2018).
Vitry, P. et al. Force-induced strengthening of the interaction between Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor B and loricrin. MBio 8, e01748-17 (2017).
McDevitt, D. et al. Characterization of the interaction between the Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor (ClfA) and fibrinogen. Eur. J. Biochem. 247, 416–424 (1997).
Jarvis, C. et al. Antivirulence isoquinolone mannosides: optimization of the biaryl aglycone for FimH lectin binding affinity and efficacy in the treatment of chronic UTI. ChemMedChem 11, 367–373 (2016).
Spaulding, C. N. et al. Selective depletion of uropathogenic E. coli from the gut by a FimH antagonist. Nature 546, 528–532 (2017).
Persat, A. Bacterial mechanotransduction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 36, 1–6 (2017).
Gordon, V. D. & Wang, L. Bacterial mechanosensing: the force will be with you, always. J. Cell Sci. 132, jcs227694 (2019).
Laventie, B.-J. et al. A surface-induced asymmetric program promotes tissue colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cell Host Microbe 25, 140–152.e6 (2019). This paper shows that levels of c-di-GMP rapidly increase upon P. aeruginosa surface contact, promoting the immediate deployment of T4P.
Persat, A., Inclan, Y. F., Engel, J. N., Stone, H. A. & Gitai, Z. Type IV pili mechanochemically regulate virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7563–7568 (2015). A demonstration of the ability of P. aeruginosa to mechanically sense surfaces with T4P and the Chp system to regulate cAMP levels.
Wolfgang, M. C., Lee, V. T., Gilmore, M. E. & Lory, S. Coordinate regulation of bacterial virulence genes by a novel adenylate cyclase-dependent signaling pathway. Dev. Cell 4, 253–263 (2003).
Chuang, S. K., Vrla, G. D., Fröhlich, K. S. & Gitai, Z. Surface association sensitizes Pseudomonas aeruginosa to quorum sensing. Nat. Commun. 10, 4118 (2019).
Inclan, Y. F. et al. A scaffold protein connects type IV pili with the Chp chemosensory system to mediate activation of virulence signaling in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 101, 590–605 (2016).
Bertrand, J. J., West, J. T. & Engel, J. N. Genetic analysis of the regulation of type IV pilus function by the Chp chemosensory system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 192, 994–1010 (2010).
Lee, C. K. et al. Multigenerational memory and adaptive adhesion in early bacterial biofilm communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4471–4476 (2018).
Rodesney, C. A. et al. Mechanosensing of shear by Pseudomonas aeruginosa leads to increased levels of the cyclic-di-GMP signal initiating biofilm development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5906–5911 (2017). This paper shows that shear forces promote the production of c-di-GMP in P. aeruginosa.
Luo, Y. et al. A hierarchical cascade of second messengers regulates Pseudomonas aeruginosa surface behaviors. MBio https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02456-14 (2015). This paper demonstrates that P. aeruginosa use distinct mechanosensitive machineries to successively regulate cAMP and c-di-GMP levels.
Siryaporn, A., Kuchma, S. L., O’Toole, G. A. & Gitai, Z. Surface attachment induces Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16860–16865 (2014).
Kuchma, S. L. et al. Cyclic Di-GMP-mediated repression of swarming motility by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 requires the MotAB stator. J. Bacteriol. 197, 420–430 (2015).
Baker, A. E. et al. Flagellar stators stimulate c-di-GMP production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 201, e00741–18 (2019).
Yan, J. et al. Bow-tie signaling in c-di-GMP: machine learning in a simple biochemical network. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005677 (2017).
Sanfilippo, J. E. et al. Microfluidic-based transcriptomics reveal force-independent bacterial rheosensing. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1274–1281 (2019).
Lee, C. K. et al. Evolution of cell size homeostasis and growth rate diversity during initial surface colonization of Shewanella oneidensis. ACS Nano 10, 9183–9192 (2016).
Li, G. et al. Surface contact stimulates the just-in-time deployment of bacterial adhesins. Mol. Microbiol. 83, 41–51 (2012).
Hug, I., Deshpande, S., Sprecher, K. S., Pfohl, T. & Jenal, U. Second messenger-mediated tactile response by a bacterial rotary motor. Science 358, 531–534 (2017). This paper shows that the flagellum motor of C. crescentus acts as a mechanosensor to regulate the deployment of its polar adhesin.
Nesper, J. et al. Cyclic di-GMP differentially tunes a bacterial flagellar motor through a novel class of CheY-like regulators. eLife 6, e28842 (2017).
Persat, A., Stone, H. A. & Gitai, Z. The curved shape of Caulobacter crescentus enhances surface colonization in flow. Nat. Commun. 5, 3824 (2014).
Cairns, L. S., Marlow, V. L., Bissett, E., Ostrowski, A. & Stanley-Wall, N. R. A mechanical signal transmitted by the flagellum controls signalling in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 90, 6–21 (2013).
Alsharif, G. et al. Host attachment and fluid shear are integrated into a mechanical signal regulating virulence in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5503–5508 (2015). A demonstration that host cell contact and flow induce virulence of enterohemorrhagic E. coli.
Otto, K. & Silhavy, T. J. Surface sensing and adhesion of Escherichia coli controlled by the Cpx-signaling pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2287–2292 (2002).
Shimizu, T., Ichimura, K. & Noda, M. The surface sensor NlpE of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli contributes to regulation of the type III secretion system and flagella by the Cpx response to adhesion. Infect. Immun. 84, 537–549 (2015).
Kimkes, T. E. P. & Heinemann, M. Reassessing the role of the Escherichia coli CpxAR system in sensing surface contact. PLoS One 13, e0207181 (2018).
Bruni, G. N., Weekley, R. A., Dodd, B. J. T. & Kralj, J. M. Voltage-gated calcium flux mediates Escherichia coli mechanosensation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 9445–9450 (2017). This paper shows that mechanical compression activates membrane-bound ion channels in E. coli.
Haswell, E. S., Phillips, R. & Rees, D. C. Mechanosensitive channels: what can they do and how do they do it? Structure 19, 1356–1369 (2011).
Perozo, E., Kloda, A., Cortes, D. M. & Martinac, B. Physical principles underlying the transduction of bilayer deformation forces during mechanosensitive channel gating. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9, 696–703 (2002).
Abe, F. Dynamic structural changes in microbial membranes in response to high hydrostatic pressure analyzed using time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy measurement. Biophys. Chem. 183, 3–8 (2013).
Bartlett, D., Wright, M., Yayanos, A. A. & Silverman, M. Isolation of a gene regulated by hydrostatic pressure in a deep-sea bacterium. Nature 342, 572–574 (1989).
Myka, K. K. et al. in Microbial Ecology of Extreme Environments (eds Chenard, C. & Lauro, F. M.) 51–80 (Springer, 2017).
Welch, T. J. & Bartlett, D. H. Identification of a regulatory protein required for pressure-responsive gene expression in the deep-sea bacterium Photobacterium species strain SS9. Mol. Microbiol. 27, 977–985 (1998).
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R. & Milo, R. The biomass distribution on earth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6506–6511 (2018).
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C. & Wiebe, W. J. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6578–6583 (1998).
Flemming, H.-C. & Wuertz, S. Bacteria and archaea on earth and their abundance in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 247–260 (2019).
Daniel, I., Oger, P. & Winter, R. Origins of life and biochemistry under high-pressure conditions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 858–875 (2006).
Flemming, H.-C. et al. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 563–575 (2016).
Hall-Stoodley, L., Costerton, J. W. & Stoodley, P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 95–108 (2004).
Battin, T. J., Kaplan, L. A., Denis Newbold, J. & Hansen, C. M. Contributions of microbial biofilms to ecosystem processes in stream mesocosms. Nature 426, 439–442 (2003).
Battin, T. J., Besemer, K., Bengtsson, M. M., Romani, A. M. & Packmann, A. I. The ecology and biogeochemistry of stream biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 251–263 (2016).
Hooper, L. V. & Gordon, J. I. Commensal host-bacterial relationships in the gut. Science 292, 1115–1118 (2001).
De Weirdt, R. & Van de Wiele, T. Micromanagement in the gut: microenvironmental factors govern colon mucosal biofilm structure and functionality. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 1, 15026 (2015).
Mah, T. F. & O’Toole, G. A. Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends Microbiol. 9, 34–39 (2001).
Flemming, H.-C. & Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 623–633 (2010).
Marchetti, M. C. et al. Hydrodynamics of soft active matter. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143–1189 (2013).
Douarche, C., Allain, J.-M. & Raspaud, E. Bacillus subtilis bacteria generate an internal mechanical force within a biofilm. Biophys. J. 109, 2195–2202 (2015).
Beroz, F. et al. Verticalization of bacterial biofilms. Nat. Phys. 14, 954–960 (2018).
Yan, J. et al. Mechanical instability and interfacial energy drive biofilm morphogenesis. eLife. 8, e43920 (2019).
Chu, E. K., Kilic, O., Cho, H., Groisman, A. & Levchenko, A. Self-induced mechanical stress can trigger biofilm formation in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat. Commun. 9, 4087 (2018). This paper shows that growth-generated mechanical compression can induce the formation of biofilms.
Delarue, M. et al. Self-driven jamming in growing microbial populations. Nat. Phys. 12, 762–766 (2016).
Ewoldt, R. H., Hosoi, A. E. & McKinley, G. H. Nonlinear viscoelastic biomaterials: meaningful characterization and engineering inspiration. Integr. Comp. Biol. 49, 40–50 (2009).
Boudarel, H., Mathias, J.-D., Blaysat, B. & Grédiac, M. Towards standardized mechanical characterization of microbial biofilms: analysis and critical review. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 4, 17 (2018).
Even, C. et al. Recent advances in studying single bacteria and biofilm mechanics. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 247, 573–588 (2017).
Heisenberg, C.-P. & Bellaïche, Y. Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning. Cell 153, 948–962 (2013).
Rivera-Yoshida, N., Arias Del Angel, J. A. & Benítez, M. Microbial multicellular development: mechanical forces in action. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 51, 37–45 (2018).
Stewart, P. S. & Franklin, M. J. Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 199–210 (2008).
Earle, K. A. et al. Quantitative imaging of gut microbiota spatial organization. Cell Host Microbe 18, 478–488 (2015).
Tropini, C., Earle, K. A., Huang, K. C. & Sonnenburg, J. L. The gut microbiome: connecting spatial organization to function. Cell Host Microbe 21, 433–442 (2017).
Nadell, C. D., Drescher, K. & Foster, K. R. Spatial structure, cooperation and competition in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 589–600 (2016).
Mukherjee, S. & Bassler, B. L. Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 371–382 (2019).
Liu, G. et al. Self-driven phase transitions drive Myxococcus xanthus fruiting body formation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 248102 (2019).
Kientz, B. et al. Glitter-like iridescence within the bacteroidetes especially cellulophaga spp.: optical properties and correlation with gliding motility. PLoS One 7, e52900 (2012).
Drescher, K., Nadell, C. D., Stone, H. A., Wingreen, N. S. & Bassler, B. L. Solutions to the public goods dilemma in bacterial biofilms. Curr. Biol. 24, 50–55 (2014).
Besemer, K. et al. Biophysical controls on community succession in stream biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 4966–4974 (2007).
Niederdorfer, R., Peter, H. & Battin, T. J. Attached biofilms and suspended aggregates are distinct microbial lifestyles emanating from differing hydraulics. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16178 (2016).
Rossy, T., Nadell, C. D. & Persat, A. Cellular advective-diffusion drives the emergence of bacterial surface colonization patterns and heterogeneity. Nat. Commun. 10, 2471 (2019). This paper shows that fluid flow influences biofilm morphology and spatial organization.
Martínez-García, R., Nadell, C. D., Hartmann, R., Drescher, K. & Bonachela, J. A. Cell adhesion and fluid flow jointly initiate genotype spatial distribution in biofilms. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006094 (2018).
Nadell, C. D., Ricaurte, D., Yan, J., Drescher, K. & Bassler, B. L. Flow environment and matrix structure interact to determine spatial competition in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. eLife 6, e21855 (2017).
Wucher, B. R. et al. Vibrio cholerae filamentation promotes chitin surface attachment at the expense of competition in biofilms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14216–14221 (2019).
Hartmann, R. et al. Emergence of three-dimensional order and structure in growing biofilms. Nat. Phys. 15, 251–256 (2019). This paper shows that mechanical cell–cell interactions are the dominant contributor of spatial organization in biofilms.
Nadell, C. D., Drescher, K., Wingreen, N. S. & Bassler, B. L. Extracellular matrix structure governs invasion resistance in bacterial biofilms. ISME J. 9, 1700–1709 (2015).
Seminara, A. et al. Osmotic spreading of Bacillus subtilis biofilms driven by an extracellular matrix. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1116–1121 (2012).
Srinivasan, S., Kaplan, C. N. & Mahadevan, L. A multiphase theory for spreading microbial swarms and films. eLife 8, e42697 (2019).
Yan, J., Nadell, C. D., Stone, H. A., Wingreen, N. S. & Bassler, B. L. Extracellular-matrix-mediated osmotic pressure drives Vibrio cholerae biofilm expansion and cheater exclusion. Nat. Commun. 8, 327 (2017).
Bjarnsholt, T. et al. The in vivo biofilm. Trends Microbiol. 21, 466–474 (2013).
Wagner, C. E., Wheeler, K. M. & Ribbeck, K. Mucins and their role in shaping the functions of mucus barriers. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 34, 189–215 (2018).
Johansson, M. E. V. et al. The inner of the two Muc2 mucin-dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15064–15069 (2008).
DePas, W. H. et al. Exposing the three-dimensional biogeography and metabolic states of pathogens in cystic fibrosis sputum via hydrogel embedding, clearing, and rRNA labeling. MBio 7, e00796–16, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00796-16 (2016).
Caldara, M. et al. Mucin biopolymers prevent bacterial aggregation by retaining cells in the free-swimming state. Curr. Biol. 22, 2325–2330 (2012).
Frenkel, E. S. & Ribbeck, K. Salivary mucins promote the coexistence of competing oral bacterial species. ISME J. 11, 1286–1290 (2017).
Donaldson, G. P., Lee, S. M. & Mazmanian, S. K. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 20–32 (2016).
McLoughlin, K., Schluter, J., Rakoff-Nahoum, S., Smith, A. L. & Foster, K. R. Host selection of microbiota via differential adhesion. Cell Host Microbe 19, 550–559 (2016). This paper provides computational predictions of the dynamics and spatial organisation of mucus-associated biofilms.
Frantz, C., Stewart, K. M. & Weaver, V. M. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 123, 4195–4200 (2010).
Plotnikov, S. V., Pasapera, A. M., Sabass, B. & Waterman, C. M. Force fluctuations within focal adhesions mediate ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration. Cell 151, 1513–1527 (2012).
Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L. & Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689 (2006).
Baker, B. M. & Chen, C. S. Deconstructing the third dimension – how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. J. Cell Sci. 125, 3015–3024 (2012).
Ladoux, B. & Mège, R.-M. Mechanobiology of collective cell behaviours. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 743–757 (2017).
Ranade, S. S. et al. Piezo1, a mechanically activated ion channel, is required for vascular development in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10347–10352 (2014).
Mathijssen, A. J. T. M., Culver, J., Bhamla, M. S. & Prakash, M. Collective intercellular communication through ultra-fast hydrodynamic trigger waves. Nature 571, 560–564 (2019).
Renner, L. D. & Weibel, D. B. Physicochemical regulation of biofilm formation. MRS Bull. 36, 347–355 (2011).
O’Toole, G. A. & Wong, G. C. Sensational biofilms: surface sensing in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 30, 139–146 (2016).
Irie, Y. et al. Self-produced exopolysaccharide is a signal that stimulates biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20632–20636 (2012).
Kovach, K. et al. Evolutionary adaptations of biofilms infecting cystic fibrosis lungs promote mechanical toughness by adjusting polysaccharide production. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 3, 1–9 (2017).
Chew, S. C. et al. Dynamic remodeling of microbial biofilms by functionally distinct exopolysaccharides. MBio https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01536-14 (2014).
Zorraquino, V. et al. Coordinated cyclic-di-GMP repression of Salmonella motility through YcgR and cellulose. J. Bacteriol. 195, 417–428 (2013).
Murthy, S. E., Dubin, A. E. & Patapoutian, A. Piezos thrive under pressure: mechanically activated ion channels in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 771–783 (2017).
Coste, B. et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330, 55–60 (2010).
Wang, L. et al. Structure and mechanogating of the mammalian tactile channel PIEZO2. Nature 573, 225–229 (2019).
Lin, Y.-C. et al. Force-induced conformational changes in PIEZO1. Nature 573, 230–234 (2019).
Orell, A., Fröls, S. & Albers, S.-V. Archaeal biofilms: the great unexplored. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 67, 337–354 (2013).
Bell, G. I. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 200, 618–627 (1978).
Stocker, R. Marine microbes see a sea of gradients. Science 338, 628–633 (2012).
Deng, Y., Sun, M. & Shaevitz, J. W. Direct measurement of cell wall stress stiffening and turgor pressure in live bacterial cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 158101 (2011).
Swift, J. et al. Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 341, 1240104 (2013).
Gennes, P.-G. de & Gennes, P. P.-G. Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, 1979).
Phillips, R., Kondev, J. & Theriot, J. Physical Biology of the Cell (Garland Science, 2013).
Jacobs, C. R., Huang, H. & Kwon, R. Y. Introduction to Cell Mechanics and Mechanobiology (Garland Science, 2012).
Moffitt, J. R., Chemla, Y. R., Smith, S. B. & Bustamante, C. Recent advances in optical tweezers. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 205–228 (2008).
Neuman, K. C. & Nagy, A. Single-molecule force spectroscopy: optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers and atomic force microscopy. Nat. Methods 5, 491–505 (2008).
Merz, A. J., So, M. & Sheetz, M. P. Pilus retraction powers bacterial twitching motility. Nature 407, 98–102 (2000).
Maier, B., Potter, L., So, M., Seifert, H. S. & Sheetz, M. P. Single pilus motor forces exceed 100 pN. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16012–16017 (2002).
Xiao, J. & Dufrêne, Y. F. Optical and force nanoscopy in microbiology. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16186 (2016).
Biais, N., Higashi, D., So, M. & Ladoux, B. Techniques to measure pilus retraction forces. Methods Mol. Biol. 799, 197–216 (2012).
Sabass, B., Koch, M. D., Liu, G., Stone, H. A. & Shaevitz, J. W. Force generation by groups of migrating bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7266–7271 (2017).
Duvernoy, M.-C. et al. Asymmetric adhesion of rod-shaped bacteria controls microcolony morphogenesis. Nat. Commun. 9, 1120 (2018).
Karampatzakis, A. et al. Probing the internal micromechanical properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by Brillouin imaging. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 3, 20 (2017).
Rusconi, R., Garren, M. & Stocker, R. Microfluidics expanding the frontiers of microbial ecology. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 43, 65–91 (2014).
Son, K., Brumley, D. R. & Stocker, R. Live from under the lens: exploring microbial motility with dynamic imaging and microfluidics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 761–775 (2015).
Lewis, K. J. R. & Anseth, K. S. Hydrogel scaffolds to study cell biology in four dimensions. MRS Bull. 38, 260–268 (2013).
Colom, A. et al. A fluorescent membrane tension probe. Nat. Chem. 10, 1118–1125 (2018).
Özkale, B. et al. Modular soft robotic microdevices for dexterous biomanipulation. Lab. Chip 19, 778–788 (2019).
Mongera, A. et al. A fluid-to-solid jamming transition underlies vertebrate body axis elongation. Nature 561, 401–405 (2018).
The authors would like to thank N. Biais and members of the Persat laboratory for useful discussions and feedback. A.P. is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Projects Grant 31003A_169377, the Gabriella Giorgi-Cavaglieri Foundation, the Gebert Rüf Stiftung and the Fondation Beytout. Work at UCLouvain was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement n°693630), the FNRS-WELBIO (grant n°WELBIO-CR-2015A-05), the National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS), and the Research Department of the Communauté française de Belgique (Concerted Research Action).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Microbiology thanks U. Jenal, D. Limoli and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Interactions that change the motion or shape of a body.
- Hydrostatic pressure
The pressure in a static fluid generated by gravity.
- Shear forces
Forces that are applied tangentially to a body’s surface, generally generated by flow.
- Mechanical stress
A quantity that expresses the internal forces of a material.
An interaction causing a body to rotate.
- Flagellum basal body
A group of proteins that anchors the flagellum to the cell body and includes the flagellum motor.
An extremely sticky substance secreted at the poles of many prosthecate bacteria that enables irreversible attachment.
An optical effect where light reflecting on a surface generates rainbow-like colours by interference.
Highly glycosylated proteins that can form a gel layer at epithelial surfaces upon exocytosis or decorate the surface of mammalian cells.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dufrêne, Y.F., Persat, A. Mechanomicrobiology: how bacteria sense and respond to forces. Nat Rev Microbiol 18, 227–240 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0314-2
This article is cited by
High-force catch bonds between the Staphylococcus aureus surface protein SdrE and complement regulator factor H drive immune evasion
Communications Biology (2023)
The ecological roles of bacterial chemotaxis
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2022)
Bacterial motility: machinery and mechanisms
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2022)
Fibronectin binding protein B binds to loricrin and promotes corneocyte adhesion by Staphylococcus aureus
Nature Communications (2022)
The role of single-protein elasticity in mechanobiology
Nature Reviews Materials (2022)