The CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) is a potential means of using renewable electricity to synthesize commodity chemicals and fuels. The CO2RR can be performed at industrially relevant product formation rates in an electrolyser, which must simultaneously manage the transport of electrons, water, CO2 and protons at a cathode. Gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) and polymer electrolyte membranes are used to mediate these critical processes. Consequently, the design and development of GDEs and membranes tailored for the CO2RR is critical. In this Review, we discuss how the properties of GDEs and polymer electrolyte membranes affect CO2RR electrolysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Non-invasive current collectors for improved current-density distribution during CO2 electrolysis on super-hydrophobic electrodes
Nature Communications Open Access 18 October 2023
Surface-immobilized cross-linked cationic polyelectrolyte enables CO2 reduction with metal cation-free acidic electrolyte
Nature Communications Open Access 13 September 2023
Nature Communications Open Access 03 August 2023
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
De Luna, P. et al. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364, eaav3506 (2019).
Cook, T. R. et al. Solar energy supply and storage for the legacy and nonlegacy worlds. Chem. Rev. 110, 6474–6502 (2010).
Lewis, N. S. & Nocera, D. G. Powering the planet: chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15729–15735 (2006).
van Bavel, S., Verma, S., Negro, E. & Bracht, M. Integrating CO2 electrolysis into the gas-to-liquids–power-to-liquids process. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 2597–2601 (2020).
Qi, Z. et al. Electrochemical CO2 to CO reduction at high current densities using a nanoporous gold catalyst. Mater. Res. Lett. 9, 99–104 (2021).
Welch, A. J., Dunn, E., DuChene, J. S. & Atwater, H. A. Bicarbonate or carbonate processes for coupling carbon dioxide capture and electrochemical conversion. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 940–945 (2020).
Jouny, M., Luc, W. & Jiao, F. General techno-economic analysis of CO2 electrolysis systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 2165–2177 (2018).
Ripatti, D. S., Veltman, T. R. & Kanan, M. W. Carbon monoxide gas diffusion electrolysis that produces concentrated C2 products with high single-pass conversion. Joule 3, 240–256 (2019).
Rabinowitz, J. A. & Kanan, M. W. The future of low-temperature carbon dioxide electrolysis depends on solving one basic problem. Nat. Commun. 11, 5231 (2020).
Weekes, D. M., Salvatore, D. A., Reyes, A., Huang, A. & Berlinguette, C. P. Electrolytic CO2 reduction in a flow cell. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 910–918 (2018).
Bhargava, S. S. et al. System design rules for intensifying the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO on Ag nanoparticles. ChemElectroChem 7, 2001–2011 (2020).
Jeanty, P. et al. Upscaling and continuous operation of electrochemical CO2 to CO conversion in aqueous solutions on silver gas diffusion electrodes. J. CO2 Util. 24, 454–462 (2018).
Jeng, E. & Jiao, F. Investigation of CO2 single-pass conversion in a flow electrolyzer. React. Chem. Eng. 5, 1768–1775 (2020).
Reyes, A. et al. Managing hydration at the cathode enables efficient CO2 electrolysis at commercially relevant current densities. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1612–1618 (2020).
Larrazábal, G. O. et al. Analysis of mass flows and membrane cross-over in CO2 reduction at high current densities in an MEA-type electrolyzer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 41281–41288 (2019).
Ma, M. et al. Insights into the carbon balance for CO2 electroreduction on Cu using gas diffusion electrode reactor designs. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 977–985 (2020).
Higgins, D., Hahn, C., Xiang, C., Jaramillo, T. F. & Weber, A. Z. Gas-diffusion electrodes for carbon dioxide reduction: a new paradigm. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 317–324 (2019).
Dinh, C.-T. et al. CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface. Science 360, 783–787 (2018).
Dinh, C.-T., de Arquer, F. P. G., Sinton, D. & Sargent, E. H. High rate, selective, and stable electroreduction of CO2 to CO in basic and neutral media. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 2835–2840 (2018).
Verma, S., Nwabara, U. O. & Kenis, P. J. A. in Nanocarbons for Energy Conversion: Supramolecular Approaches (ed. Nakashima, N.) 219–251 (Springer, 2019).
Liu, K., Smith, W. A. & Burdyny, T. Introductory guide to assembling and operating gas diffusion electrodes for electrochemical CO2 reduction. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 639–643 (2019).
García de Arquer, F. P. et al. CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products at activities greater than 1 A cm−2. Science 367, 661–666 (2020).
Ozden, A. et al. High-rate and efficient ethylene electrosynthesis using a catalyst/promoter/transport layer. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 2811–2818 (2020).
Gabardo, C. M. et al. Continuous carbon dioxide electroreduction to concentrated multi-carbon products using a membrane electrode assembly. Joule 3, 2777–2791 (2019).
Tan, Y. C., Lee, K. B., Song, H. & Oh, J. Modulating local CO2 concentration as a general strategy for enhancing C–C coupling in CO2 electroreduction. Joule 4, 1104–1120 (2020).
Wang, X. et al. Mechanistic reaction pathways of enhanced ethylene yields during electroreduction of CO2–CO co-feeds on Cu and Cu-tandem electrocatalysts. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 1063–1070 (2019).
Li, J. et al. Efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction on a three-phase interface. Nat. Catal. 1, 592–600 (2018).
Kusoglu, A. & Weber, A. Z. New insights into perfluorinated sulfonic-acid ionomers. Chem. Rev. 117, 987–1104 (2017).
Zhang, B. A., Ozel, T., Elias, J. S., Costentin, C. & Nocera, D. G. Interplay of homogeneous reactions, mass transport, and kinetics in determining selectivity of the reduction of CO2 on gold electrodes. ACS Cent. Sci. 5, 1097–1105 (2019).
Hall, A. S., Yoon, Y., Wuttig, A. & Surendranath, Y. Mesostructure-induced selectivity in CO2 reduction catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 14834–14837 (2015).
Welch, A. J. et al. Nanoporous gold as a highly selective and active carbon dioxide reduction catalyst. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 164–170 (2019).
Yoon, Y., Hall, A. S. & Surendranath, Y. Tuning of silver catalyst mesostructure promotes selective carbon dioxide conversion into fuels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 15282–15286 (2016).
Gupta, N., Gattrell, M. & MacDougall, B. Calculation for the cathode surface concentrations in the electrochemical reduction of CO2 in KHCO3 solutions. J. Appl. Electrochem. 36, 161–172 (2006).
Sen, S., Liu, D. & Palmore, G. T. R. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 at copper nanofoams. ACS Catal. 4, 3091–3095 (2014).
Song, H. et al. Effect of mass transfer and kinetics in ordered Cu-mesostructures for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Appl. Catal. B 232, 391–396 (2018).
Suter, S. & Haussener, S. Optimizing mesostructured silver catalysts for selective carbon dioxide conversion into fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1668–1678 (2019).
Yang, K., Kas, R. & Smith, W. A. In situ infrared spectroscopy reveals persistent alkalinity near electrode surfaces during CO2 electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 15891–15900 (2019).
Endrődi, B. et al. Multilayer electrolyzer stack converts carbon dioxide to gas products at high pressure with high efficiency. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 1770–1777 (2019).
Verma, S. et al. Insights into the low overpotential electroreduction of CO2 to CO on a supported gold catalyst in an alkaline flow electrolyzer. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 193–198 (2018).
Nitopi, S. et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119, 7610–7672 (2019).
Kadyk, T., Bruce, D. & Eikerling, M. How to enhance gas removal from porous electrodes? Sci. Rep. 6, 38780 (2016).
Angulo, A., van der Linde, P., Gardeniers, H., Modestino, M. & Fernández Rivas, D. Influence of bubbles on the energy conversion efficiency of electrochemical reactors. Joule 4, 555–579 (2020).
Burdyny, T. et al. Nanomorphology-enhanced gas-evolution intensifies CO2 reduction electrochemistry. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5, 4031–4040 (2017).
Faber, M. S. et al. High-performance electrocatalysis using metallic cobalt pyrite (CoS2) micro- and nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 10053–10061 (2014).
Lv, J.-J. et al. A highly porous copper electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction. Adv. Mater. 30, e1803111 (2018).
Zeradjanin, A. R. et al. Rational design of the electrode morphology for oxygen evolution – enhancing the performance for catalytic water oxidation. RSC Adv. 4, 9579–9587 (2014).
Zhao, C. et al. Solid-diffusion synthesis of single-atom catalysts directly from bulk metal for efficient CO2 reduction. Joule 3, 584–594 (2019).
Kas, R. et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction on nanostructured metal electrodes: fact or defect? Chem. Sci. 11, 1738–1749 (2020).
Weng, L.-C., Bell, A. T. & Weber, A. Z. Modeling gas-diffusion electrodes for CO2 reduction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 16973–16984 (2018).
Santamaria, A. D., Das, P. K., MacDonald, J. C. & Weber, A. Z. Liquid-water interactions with gas-diffusion-layer surfaces. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, F1184–F1193 (2014).
Benziger, J., Nehlsen, J., Blackwell, D., Brennan, T. & Itescu, J. Water flow in the gas diffusion layer of PEM fuel cells. J. Membr. Sci. 261, 98–106 (2005).
Jähne, B., Heinz, G. & Dietrich, W. Measurement of the diffusion coefficients of sparingly soluble gases in water. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 10767–10766 (1987).
Kutana, A. & Giapis, K. P. Atomistic simulations of electrowetting in carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 6, 656–661 (2006).
Lomax, D. J. et al. Ultra-low voltage electrowetting using graphite surfaces. Soft Matter 12, 8798–8804 (2016).
Weber, A. Z. & Newman, J. Transport in polymer-electrolyte membranes: II. Mathematical model. J. Electrochem. Soc. 151, A311–A325 (2004).
Weber, A. Z., Darling, R. M. & Newman, J. Modeling two-phase behavior in PEFCs. J. Electrochem. Soc. 151, A1715–A1727 (2004).
Uchida, M., Aoyama, Y., Eda, N. & Ohta, A. Investigation of the microstructure in the catalyst layer and effects of both perfluorosulfonate ionomer and PTFE-loaded carbon on the catalyst layer of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 4143–4149 (1995).
Haas, T., Krause, R., Weber, R., Demler, M. & Schmid, G. Technical photosynthesis involving CO2 electrolysis and fermentation. Nat. Catal. 1, 32–39 (2018).
Wang, Q., Dong, H., Yu, H. & Yu, H. Enhanced performance of gas diffusion electrode for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formate by adding polytetrafluoroethylene into catalyst layer. J. Power Sources 279, 1–5 (2015).
Kim, B., Hillman, F., Ariyoshi, M., Fujikawa, S. & Kenis, P. J. A. Effects of composition of the micro porous layer and the substrate on performance in the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO. J. Power Sources 312, 192–198 (2016).
Xing, Z., Hu, X. & Feng, X. Tuning the microenvironment in gas-diffusion electrodes enables high-rate CO2 electrolysis to formate. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 1694–1702 (2021).
Leonard, M. E. et al. Editors’ choice — Flooded by success: on the role of electrode wettability in CO2 electrolyzers that generate liquid products. J. Electrochem. Soc. 167, 124521 (2020).
Junge Puring, K. et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction: tailoring catalyst layers in gas diffusion electrodes. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 52, 2000088 (2020).
Shi, R. et al. Efficient wettability-controlled electroreduction of CO2 to CO at Au/C interfaces. Nat. Commun. 11, 3028 (2020).
Wakerley, D. et al. Bio-inspired hydrophobicity promotes CO2 reduction on a Cu surface. Nat. Mater. 18, 1222–1227 (2019).
Liu, H. et al. Fabricating surfaces with tunable wettability and adhesion by ionic liquids in a wide range. Small 11, 1782–1786 (2015).
Diaz, L. A. et al. Electrochemical production of syngas from CO2 captured in switchable polarity solvents. Green Chem. 20, 620–626 (2018).
Li, T. et al. Electrolytic conversion of bicarbonate into CO in a flow cell. Joule 3, 1487–1497 (2019).
Li, Y. C. et al. CO2 electroreduction from carbonate electrolyte. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 1427–1431 (2019).
Li, T., Lees, E. W., Zhang, Z. & Berlinguette, C. P. Conversion of bicarbonate to formate in an electrochemical flow reactor. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 2624–2630 (2020).
Lees, E. W. et al. Electrodes designed for converting bicarbonate into CO. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 2165–2173 (2020).
Leonard, M. E., Clarke, L. E., Forner-Cuenca, A., Brown, S. M. & Brushett, F. R. Investigating electrode flooding in a flowing electrolyte, gas-fed carbon dioxide electrolyzer. ChemSusChem 13, 400–411 (2020).
Wheeler, D. G. et al. Quantification of water transport in a CO2 electrolyzer. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 5126–5134 (2020).
Salvatore, D. A. et al. Designing anion exchange membranes for CO2 electrolysers. Nat. Energy 6, 339–348 (2021).
Geise, G. M., Hickner, M. A. & Logan, B. E. Ionic resistance and permselectivity tradeoffs in anion exchange membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 10294–10301 (2013).
Hickner, M. A. & Pivovar, B. S. The chemical and structural nature of proton exchange membrane fuel cell properties. Fuel Cell 5, 213–229 (2005).
Ma, M., Kim, S., Chorkendorff, I. & Seger, B. Role of ion-selective membranes in the carbon balance for CO2 electroreduction via gas diffusion electrode reactor designs. Chem. Sci. 11, 8854–8861 (2020).
Slade, S., Campbell, S. A., Ralph, T. R. & Walsh, F. C. Ionic conductivity of an extruded nafion 1100 EW series of membranes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 149, A1556 (2002).
Paddison, S. J. The modeling of molecular structure and ion transport in sulfonic acid based ionomer membranes. J. New Mater. Electrochem. Syst. 4, 197–208 (2001).
Mauritz, K. A. & Moore, R. B. State of understanding of nafion. Chem. Rev. 104, 4535–4586 (2004).
Delacourt, C., Ridgway, P. L., Kerr, J. B. & Newman, J. Design of an electrochemical cell making syngas (CO + H2) and H2O reduction at room temperature. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, B42–B49 (2008).
Park, S., Shao, Y., Liu, J. & Wang, Y. Oxygen electrocatalysts for water electrolyzers and reversible fuel cells: status and perspective. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 9331–9344 (2012).
Lee, Y., Suntivich, J., May, K. J., Perry, E. E. & Shao-Horn, Y. Synthesis and activities of rutile IrO2 and RuO2 nanoparticles for oxygen evolution in acid and alkaline solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 399–404 (2012).
Kas, R. et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction on Cu2O-derived copper nanoparticles: controlling the catalytic selectivity of hydrocarbons. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 12194–12201 (2014).
Varela, A. S., Kroschel, M., Reier, T. & Strasser, P. Controlling the selectivity of CO2 electroreduction on copper: the effect of the electrolyte concentration and the importance of the local pH. Catal. Today 260, 8–13 (2016).
Hori, Y., Murata, A. & Takahashi, R. Formation of hydrocarbons in the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide at a copper electrode in aqueous solution. J. Chem. Soc. Lond. Faraday Trans. 1 85, 2309–2326 (1989).
Ziv, N., Mustain, W. E. & Dekel, D. R. The effect of ambient carbon dioxide on anion-exchange membrane fuel cells. ChemSusChem 11, 1136–1150 (2018).
Weng, L.-C., Bell, A. T. & Weber, A. Z. Towards membrane-electrode assembly systems for CO2 reduction: a modeling study. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1950–1968 (2019).
Jouny, M., Hutchings, G. S. & Jiao, F. Carbon monoxide electroreduction as an emerging platform for carbon utilization. Nat. Catal. 2, 1062–1070 (2019).
Chen, Y. et al. A robust, scalable platform for the electrochemical conversion of CO2 to formate; identifying pathways to higher energy efficiencies. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1825–1833 (2020).
Salvatore, D. A. et al. Electrolysis of gaseous CO2 to CO in a flow cell with a bipolar membrane. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 149–154 (2017).
Oener, S. Z., Foster, M. J. & Boettcher, S. W. Accelerating water dissociation in bipolar membranes and for electrocatalysis. Science 369, 1099–1103 (2020).
Blommaert, M. A., Verdonk, J. A. H., Blommaert, H. C. B., Smith, W. A. & Vermaas, D. A. Reduced ion crossover in bipolar membrane electrolysis via increased current density, molecular size, and valence. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 5804–5812 (2020).
Salvatore, D. & Berlinguette, C. P. Voltage matters when reducing CO2 in an electrochemical flow cell. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 215–220 (2020).
Yan, Z. et al. The balance of electric field and interfacial catalysis in promoting water dissociation in bipolar membranes. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 2235–2245 (2018).
Hohenadel, A. et al. Electrochemical characterization of hydrocarbon bipolar membranes with varying junction morphology. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 6817–6824 (2019).
Shen, C., Wycisk, R. & Pintauro, P. N. High performance electrospun bipolar membrane with a 3D junction. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1435–1442 (2017).
Varcoe, J. R. et al. Anion-exchange membranes in electrochemical energy systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3135–3191 (2014).
Hibbs, M. R. et al. Transport properties of hydroxide and proton conducting membranes. Chem. Mater. 20, 2566–2573 (2008).
Oener, S. Z., Twight, L. P., Lindquist, G. A. & Boettcher, S. W. Thin cation-exchange layers enable high-current-density bipolar membrane electrolyzers via improved water transport. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 1–8 (2021).
Liu, Z., Yang, H., Kutz, R. & Masel, R. I. CO2 electrolysis to CO and O2 at high selectivity, stability and efficiency using sustainion membranes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, J3371–J3377 (2018).
Li, Y. C. et al. Bipolar membranes inhibit product crossover in CO2 electrolysis cells. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2, 1700187 (2018).
Fierro, S., Nagel, T., Baltruschat, H. & Comninellis, C. Investigation of formic acid oxidation on Ti/IrO2 electrodes using isotope labeling and online mass spectrometry. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 11, E20 (2008).
Fierro, S. et al. Investigation of formic acid oxidation on Ti/IrO2 electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 54, 2053–2061 (2009).
Luo, T., Abdu, S. & Wessling, M. Selectivity of ion exchange membranes: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 555, 429–454 (2018).
Krödel, M. et al. Rational design of ion exchange membrane material properties limits the crossover of CO2 reduction products in artificial photosynthesis devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 12030–12042 (2020).
Yin, Z. et al. An alkaline polymer electrolyte CO2 electrolyzer operated with pure water. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 2455–2462 (2019).
Greenblatt, J. B., Miller, D. J., Ager, J. W., Houle, F. A. & Sharp, I. D. The technical and energetic challenges of separating (photo)electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction products. Joule 2, 381–420 (2018).
Holdcroft, S. Fuel cell catalyst layers: a polymer science perspective. Chem. Mater. 26, 381–393 (2014).
Mukaddam, M., Litwiller, E. & Pinnau, I. Gas sorption, diffusion, and permeation in nafion. Macromolecules 49, 280–286 (2016).
Jervis, R. et al. The importance of using alkaline ionomer binders for screening electrocatalysts in alkaline electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, F1551 (2017).
Lees, E. W. et al. Linking gas diffusion electrode composition to CO2 reduction in a flow cell. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 19493–19501 (2020).
Chen, C. et al. Varying the microphase separation patterns of alkaline polymer electrolytes. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. Energy Sustain. 4, 4071–4081 (2016).
Pan, J., Chen, C., Zhuang, L. & Lu, J. Designing advanced alkaline polymer electrolytes for fuel cell applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 473–481 (2012).
Xu, Y. et al. Oxygen-tolerant electroproduction of C2 products from simulated flue gas. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 554–561 (2020).
Endrődi, B. et al. High carbonate ion conductance of a robust PiperION membrane allows industrial current density and conversion in a zero-gap carbon dioxide electrolyzer cell. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 4098–4105 (2020).
Zhang, H.-W., Chen, D.-Z., Xianze, Y. & Yin, S.-B. Anion-exchange membranes for fuel cells: synthesis strategies, properties and perspectives. Fuel Cell 15, 761–780 (2015).
O’Brien, T. F., Bommaraju, T. V. & Hine, F. Handbook of Chlor-Alkali Technology (Springer, 2005).
Zhang, Z. et al. pH matters when reducing CO2 in an electrochemical flow cell. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 3101–3107 (2020).
Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 85th edn (CRC, 2004).
Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J. & Nørskov, J. K. How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1311–1315 (2010).
Birdja, Y. Y. et al. Advances and challenges in understanding the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels. Nat. Energy 4, 732–745 (2019).
Ross, M. B. et al. Designing materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide recycling. Nat. Catal. 2, 648–658 (2019).
Resasco, J. & Bell, A. T. Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to fuels: progress and opportunities. Trends Chem. 2, 825–836 (2020).
Hori, Y., Takahashi, I., Koga, O. & Hoshi, N. Selective formation of C2 compounds from electrochemical reduction of CO2 at a series of copper single crystal electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 15–17 (2002).
Takahashi, I., Koga, O., Hoshi, N. & Hori, Y. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 at copper single crystal Cu(S)-[n(111)×(111)] and Cu(S)-[n(110)×(100)] electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 533, 135–143 (2002).
Hori, Y., Takahashi, I., Koga, O. & Hoshi, N. Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide at various series of copper single crystal electrodes. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 199, 39–47 (2003).
Lim, C. F. C., Harrington, D. A. & Marshall, A. T. Effects of mass transfer on the electrocatalytic CO2 reduction on Cu. Electrochim. Acta 238, 56–63 (2017).
Burdyny, T. & Smith, W. A. CO2 reduction on gas-diffusion electrodes and why catalytic performance must be assessed at commercially-relevant conditions. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1442–1453 (2019).
Clark, E. L. et al. Data acquisition protocols and reporting standards for studies of the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. ACS Catal. 8, 6560–6570 (2018).
Edwards, J. P. et al. Efficient electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide in a low-resistance pressurized alkaline electrolyzer. Appl. Energy 261, 114305 (2020).
Whipple, D. T., Finke, E. C. & Kenis, P. J. A. Microfluidic reactor for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide: the effect of pH. Electrochem. Solid. State Lett. 13, B109–B111 (2010).
Jayashree, R. S. et al. On the performance of membraneless laminar flow-based fuel cells. J. Power Sources 195, 3569–3578 (2010).
Li, Y. C. et al. Electrolysis of CO2 to syngas in bipolar membrane-based electrochemical cells. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 1149–1153 (2016).
Ma, S. et al. One-step electrosynthesis of ethylene and ethanol from CO2 in an alkaline electrolyzer. J. Power Sources 301, 219–228 (2016).
Kaczur, J. J., Yang, H., Liu, Z., Sajjad, S. D. & Masel, R. I. Carbon dioxide and water electrolysis using new alkaline stable anion membranes. Front. Chem. 6, 263 (2018).
Li, D. et al. Highly quaternized polystyrene ionomers for high performance anion exchange membrane water electrolysers. Nat. Energy 5, 378–385 (2020).
Li, Q. et al. The comparability of Pt to Pt-Ru in catalyzing the hydrogen oxidation reaction for alkaline polymer electrolyte fuel cells operated at 80 °C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 131, 1456–1460 (2019).
Lu, W. et al. Polybenzimidazole-crosslinked poly(vinylbenzyl chloride) with quaternary 1,4-diazabicyclo (2.2.2) octane groups as high-performance anion exchange membrane for fuel cells. J. Power Sources 296, 204–214 (2015).
Chen, T.-Y. & Leddy, J. Ion exchange capacity of nafion and nafion composites. Langmuir 16, 2866–2871 (2000).
Lvov, S. et al. Nafion®/TiO2 composite membranes for PEM fuel cells operating at elevated temperature and reduced relative humidity. ECS Trans. 3, 73 (2006).
Knehr, K. W., Agar, E., Dennison, C. R., Kalidindi, A. R. & Kumbur, E. C. A transient vanadium flow battery model incorporating vanadium crossover and water transport through the membrane. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159, A1446 (2012).
Sigwadi, R. et al. The proton conductivity and mechanical properties of Nafion®/ZrP nanocomposite membrane. Heliyon 5, e02240 (2019).
Shi, S., Weber, A. Z. & Kusoglu, A. Structure/property relationship of Nafion XL composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 516, 123–134 (2016).
Baker, A. M., Wang, L., Johnson, W. B., Prasad, A. K. & Advani, S. G. Nafion membranes reinforced with ceria-coated multiwall carbon nanotubes for improved mechanical and chemical durability in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 26796–26802 (2014).
Torres Duarte, L. M., Domínguez Almaraz, G. M. & Torres Pacheco, C. J. Fatigue tests on the proton exchange membrane nafion 115 (perfluorosulfonic acid) of fuel cells, under the biaxial modality: tension and torsion. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2, 22–28 (2019).
Lu, Z. et al. An experimental investigation of strain rate, temperature and humidity effects on the mechanical behavior of a perfluorosulfonic acid membrane. J. Power Sources 214, 130–136 (2012).
Caire, B. R., Vandiver, M. A. & Liberatore, M. W. Mechanical testing of small, thin samples in a humidity-controlled oven. Rheol. Acta 54, 253–261 (2015).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Materials thanks Feng Jiao and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Lees, E.W., Mowbray, B.A.W., Parlane, F.G.L. et al. Gas diffusion electrodes and membranes for CO2 reduction electrolysers. Nat Rev Mater 7, 55–64 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00356-2
This article is cited by
Nature Communications (2023)
Communications Chemistry (2023)
Non-invasive current collectors for improved current-density distribution during CO2 electrolysis on super-hydrophobic electrodes
Nature Communications (2023)
Nature Communications (2023)