Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

New directions and dimensions for bioengineered models of fibrosis

During fibrotic diseases, functional tissue parenchyma progressively transforms into stiff, disorganized and non-functional tissue causing organ failure. The underlying multitude of interconnected changes in the cellular microenvironment can be investigated using bioengineered fibrosis models.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Dissecting the dynamics of fibrosis.


  1. 1.

    Habermann, A. C. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals profibrotic roles of distinct epithelial and mesenchymal lineages in pulmonary fibrosis. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba1972 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Fiore, V. F. et al. αvβ3 Integrin drives fibroblast contraction and strain stiffening of soft provisional matrix during progressive fibrosis. JCI insight (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rosales, A. M. & Anseth, K. S. The design of reversible hydrogels to capture extracellular matrix dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 15012 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pakshir, P. et al. Dynamic fibroblast contractions attract remote macrophages in fibrillar collagen matrix. Nat. Commun. 10, 1850 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Loebel, C., Mauck, R. L. & Burdick, J. A. Local nascent protein deposition and remodelling guide mesenchymal stromal cell mechanosensing and fate in three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat. Mater. 18, 883–891 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ham, T. R., Collins, K. L. & Hoffman, B. D. Molecular tension sensors: moving beyond force. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 12, 83–94 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Matera, D. L. et al. Microengineered 3D pulmonary interstitial mimetics highlight a critical role for matrix degradation in myofibroblast differentiation. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb5069 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Trappmann, B. et al. Matrix degradability controls multicellularity of 3D cell migration. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–8 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cao, Z. et al. Targeting the vascular and perivascular niches as a regenerative therapy for lung and liver fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaai8710 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lovisa, S. et al. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition compromises vascular integrity to induce Myc-mediated metabolic reprogramming in kidney fibrosis. Sci. Signal. 13, eabb8834 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


W.Y.W. and D.L.M. acknowledge financial support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (DGE1256260). B.M.B. acknowledges financial support from an NIH Pathway to Independence Award (HL124322) and the University of Michigan MCubed Program.

Author information




All authors contributed to the preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendon M. Baker.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matera, D.L., Wang, W.Y. & Baker, B.M. New directions and dimensions for bioengineered models of fibrosis. Nat Rev Mater 6, 192–195 (2021).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing