Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

We exist. We are your peers.

We must all ask ourselves critical questions about our role in the persistence of racism in academia, its effects on our colleagues and intentional actions to improve equity for all.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Allen-Ramdial, S. A. & Campbell, A. G. Reimagining the Pipeline: Advancing STEM Diversity, Persistence, and Success. Bioscience 64, 612–618 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harris, A. Why America Needs its HBCUs. The Atlantic (2019).

  3. New, J. Positive News for HBCUs. Inside Higher Ed (2015).

  4. Boyce, A. S. et al. Implementation and evaluation of a biotechnology research experience for African-American high school students. Eval. Program Plann. 72, 162–169 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy, J. Engineering by the Numbers. American Society for Engineering Education (2019).

  6. Ginther, D. K. et al. Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science 333, 1015–1019 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoppe, T. A. et al. Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists. Sci Adv 5, eaaw7238 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hofstra, B. et al. The Diversity-Innovation Paradox in Science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117, 9284–9291 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldman, E. & Marshall, E. Research funding. NIH grantees: where have all the young ones gone? Science 298, 40–41 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manu O. Platt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

There is no competing interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Platt, M.O. We exist. We are your peers.. Nat Rev Mater 5, 783–784 (2020).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing