Abstract
The twenty-first century has witnessed major developments in the field of extracellular vesicle (EV) research, including significant steps towards defining standard criteria for the separation and detection of EVs. The recent recognition that EVs have the potential to function as biomarkers or as therapeutic tools has attracted even greater attention to their study. With this progress in mind, an updated comprehensive overview of the roles of EVs in the immune system is timely. This Review summarizes the roles of EVs in basic processes of innate and adaptive immunity, including inflammation, antigen presentation, and the development and activation of B cells and T cells. It also highlights key progress related to deciphering the roles of EVs in antimicrobial defence and in allergic, autoimmune and antitumour immune responses. It ends with a focus on the relevance of EVs to immunotherapy and vaccination, drawing attention to ongoing or recently completed clinical trials that aim to harness the therapeutic potential of EVs.
Introduction
The history of research into extracellular vesicles (EVs) is an example of how a single term can delay the development of an entire scientific field. The commonly used word ‘debris’ is a nonspecific collective designation of all undefined extracellular particles and its negative tone suggests that all such particles represent cellular waste. For a long time, this connotation discouraged scientists from investigating extracellular particles in depth, thus obscuring the discovery of both EVs and non-EV nanoparticles in this compartment. However, after several decades of sporadic observations of extracellular, membrane-enclosed structures, the early 2000s brought a renewed research focus on these EVs, leading to an exponential development of the field in the past two decades1,2. The designation ‘extracellular vesicles’ was suggested in 2011 as a collective term for lipid bilayer-enclosed, cell-derived particles3. EVs are released by all cellular organisms. For example, the release of outer membrane vesicles by Gram-negative bacteria and the more recently described discharge of cytoplasmic membrane vesicles by Gram-positive bacteria and archaea demonstrate that EV production is characteristic of all three domains of life (archaea, bacteria and eukaryota)4. The broad term of bacterial extracellular vesicles is increasingly used to refer to all EVs released by bacteria5.
Since their initial description, a previously unexpected biophysical, biochemical and functional heterogeneity of EVs has been discovered2,6,7. Based on their biogenesis, we distinguish two basic types of EV (Fig. 1). Exosomes are of endosomal origin, released upon the fusion of the limiting membrane of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) or amphisomes with the plasma membrane7,8,9. Recent data suggest the involvement of additional endomembranes (such as endoplasmic reticulum10 and nuclear envelope11) in the biogenesis of exosomes. The other basic route of EV biogenesis is the release of plasma membrane-derived EVs (known as ectosomes). However, definitive molecular markers of the different biogenetic routes are not yet available, and operational terms have been suggested to distinguish EV types based on their biophysical or biochemical properties2. EVs that are present in the greatest numbers in biological fluids are small EVs with an approximate diameter of 50–150 nm. Medium-sized EVs, with an approximate diameter of 200–800 nm, are present in smaller numbers than small EVs, and large EVs (diameter ≥1 μm; such as migrasomes, exophers, apoptotic bodies, large oncosomes and en bloc-released MVB-like small EV clusters12) are the least abundant population of EVs (Table 1). The heterogeneity of EVs is a consequence of the variety of types and functional states of the releasing cells as well as of the different biogenetic routes. Of note, EVs also include vesicles generated by different cell death mechanisms (such as apoptosis, necroptosis or pyroptosis). It is also increasingly recognized that EV biogenesis can intersect with viral egress13, secretory autophagy, the cellular senescence-associated secretory phenotype and the DNA damage response14.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are heterogeneous, phospholipid membrane-enclosed structures. Two main types of EV are distinguished based on their biogenesis, known as exosomes and ectosomes. Exosomes are small EVs of endosomal origin released by the exocytosis of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) and amphisomes. Amphisomes are formed by the fusion of autophagosomes and MVBs. By contrast, ectosomes are generated by plasma membrane budding and blebbing. Of note, some ectosomes may also carry endosomal cargo components. Ectosomes include small-sized EVs (such as small ectosomes and arrestin domain-containing protein 1-mediated microvesicles), medium-sized microvesicles and the larger-sized apoptotic bodies. Viruses can also bud from the plasma membrane or can be released from MVBs. En bloc-released virus clusters represent a novel type of large EV similar to the en bloc-released MVB-like EV clusters produced by tumour cells. Oncosomes are large EVs produced by tumour cells. Long protrusions of migrating cells give rise to EVs such as migrasomes, which detach from the end of the long retraction fibres of migrating cells. Secreted midbody remnants are released upon completion of cytokinesis by dividing cells. A special type of ectosome, known as ciliary ectosomes, are shed from the plasma membrane of cilia. Beaded apoptopodia release apoptotic vesicles during apoptosis. Neutrophils rolling on the vascular endothelium leave behind elongated neutrophil-derived structures (ENDs), which later round up. Cytoplasts are large remnants of neutrophils undergoing non-lytic NETosis (not shown). Follicular dendritic cells have long filiform processes from which a beading mechanism gives rise to iccosomes. In the immune synapse, T cell microvilli are fragmented by a similar beading process to give rise to EVs known as T cell microvilli particles (TMPs). Exophers are large vesicles hanging at the end of a stalk that contain damaged organelles and protein aggregates. Secretory autophagosomes are also released by cells. Of note, in the extracellular space, non-EV nanoparticles, such as exomeres15, supermeres16 and T cell-derived supramolecular attack particles45, are also present (not shown). These nanoparticles are distinguished from EVs by their smaller size and by the lack of a phospholipid bilayer membrane surrounding them. The biogenesis of non-EV nanoparticles remains to be explored.
International guidelines for EV separation and characterization are now available and are regularly updated2. However, it should be noted that some studies of EVs, particularly those from earlier periods of EV research, could not benefit from the standards of EV separation and characterization that have been defined in the past 5 years2. In addition, given the insufficiency of specific inhibitors of the biogenesis of EV subsets and the paucity of in vivo models in which EVs can be tracked in vivo and in situ, it remains challenging to establish the in vivo biological relevance of some of the studies of EVs. Furthermore, EVs should be distinguished from other extracellular nanoparticles such as lipoproteins and the recently discovered exomeres15 and supermeres16. It is important to remember that cells are exposed to extracellular signals resulting from a temporal combination of extracellular soluble mediators, EVs and non-EV nanoparticles.
EVs are involved in several homeostatic processes, including, but not limited to, the rapid removal of unnecessary molecules from cells, enabling cell maturation and quick adaptation to environmental changes, and activation of blood clotting. In addition, they modulate the functions of other cells by delivering intercellular signals17. As signalling units, EVs affect the functions of other cells through their surface proteins, encapsulated cargo molecules (such as proteins and RNAs), and conveyed lipids and glycans. Cytokines and EVs share several functions as mediators of intercellular communication and cytokines can associate with EVs as either internal or external cargo (Box 1).
This Review demonstrates the essential, ubiquitous involvement of EVs in fundamental immune mechanisms and immune-mediated disease processes, highlighting the key advances and lessons learnt, mostly in the past 5 years of research but also briefly mentioning some of the earlier main findings. Herein, we review published data on the role of EVs in innate and adaptive immunity and the implications for diseases with immune system involvement. This knowledge may be exploited to develop new biomarkers for disease and therapy monitoring as well as new therapeutic tools and delivery vehicles as indicated by recent clinical trials in this area.
Innate immunity and inflammation
All of the immune cell types that participate in inflammation can secrete EVs, which in turn have multiple roles in inflammatory processes. EVs carry arachidonic acid-derived bioactive lipid mediators such as eicosanoids and the enzymes involved in their production, which can have chemotactic effects18,19. Furthermore, neutrophil-derived EVs transfer arachidonic acid to platelets, which in turn use cyclooxygenase 1 (COX1) to generate thromboxane A2 from arachidonic acid and induce neutrophil extravasation20. Moreover, the arachidonic acid-metabolizing enzyme platelet-type 12-lipoxygenase (12-LO) is transported by platelet-derived EVs. Together with secreted phospholipase A2 type IIA, the EV-associated 12-LO produces 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid from arachidonic acid, which in turn induces the internalization of platelet-derived EVs by neutrophils, a process that has been implicated in inflammatory arthritis21. Given the known ability of EVs to bind to molecules of the extracellular matrix22, it is also conceivable that EVs secreted by migrating inflammatory cells create stable secondary chemotactic gradients (‘trails’) in the matrix for other cells23.
Overall, in sepsis, EVs have been shown to have both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory roles24. The effects of EVs depend on the donor cell type and the phase of sepsis in which the EVs are analysed. The pro-inflammatory effects are related to EV-associated cytokines and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) such as histones, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), heat shock proteins (HSPs) and mitochondrial DAMPs, which induce macrophage polarization to an M1-type phenotype and cytokine secretion, T helper cell differentiation from naive T cells, and leukocyte chemotaxis. By contrast, certain EVs in sepsis have anti-inflammatory effects, which include downregulation of complement factors and acute phase signalling, reduction of leukocyte chemotaxis, reduction in serum pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and reduction in the expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells. These anti-inflammatory effects are due, for example, to the release of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) co-receptor CD14 on macrophage-derived EVs, leading to decreased CD14 levels on the macrophage cell surface and decreased responsiveness to LPS as well as to the downregulation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation in LPS-stimulated macrophages by HSPA12B-containing endothelial cell-derived EVs25.
There is a large body of evidence that EVs generated by either non-inflammatory or inflammatory types of cell death have discordant effects upon uptake by phagocytic cells. Recently, it was shown that uptake of necroptotic cell-derived EVs by macrophages results in the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and CCL2)26. Inflammasome activation during pyroptosis induces a marked release of exosomes, and a connection has been established between inflammasome-mediated cleavage of Rab-interacting lysosomal protein (RILP) and the selective loading of microRNAs (miRNAs) into EVs27. Thus, inflammasome activation induces the loading of pro-inflammatory miRNAs containing an AAUGC motif (for example, hsa-miR-124-3p, hsa-miR-155-5p and hsa-miR-126-3p) to exosomes. Inflammasome-induced EVs also carry interferon-β (IFNβ), which was suggested to prevent hyperinflammation28. The IFNβ carried by EVs induces changes in the expression of interferon response genes in bystander cells and restricts their activation of the NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome.
Of note, soluble mediators of innate immunity also have important EV-related functions. EVs can carry the acute-phase protein C-reactive protein (CRP) from the liver and spread it through the circulation. Whereas most plasma CRP has a pentameric structure, circulating EVs in sepsis carry monomeric CRP, which has pro-inflammatory properties. EV-bound monomeric CRP induces the release of CXCL8 from monocytes, contributing to the chemotaxis of neutrophils and dissemination of inflammation29. Moreover, the surface of EVs can bind both complement factors and complement regulatory proteins22. Mammalian EVs harbouring antibody-binding epitopes were shown to function as decoys to prevent complement-mediated killing of EV-releasing cells30.
Taken together, these examples show that EVs can have pro-inflammatory roles by the transfer of mediators (bioactive lipids, acute-phase proteins and cytokines), danger signals, enzymes and RNAs that affect the activation, differentiation or polarization, recruitment, cytokine production, and various other effector functions of innate immune cells. By contrast, EVs have also been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties in some environments. These data highlight the context-dependent activities of EVs in modulating innate immunity and inflammation.
Adaptive immunity
In this section, we focus on the roles of EVs in T cell and B cell development, antigen presentation to lymphocytes, and the immune synapses formed by lymphocytes.
Lymphocyte development
EVs are suggested to have important roles in T cell development, with the majority of thymic EVs being released by thymic epithelial cells. Thymic epithelial cell-derived EVs were shown to carry tissue-restricted antigens to thymic conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) for antigen presentation. In this way, EVs could contribute to the negative selection of T cells with specificity for self-antigens31. In addition, thymic epithelial cell-derived EVs have a role in inducing the maturation of single-positive (CD4+ or CD8+) thymocytes by carrying proteins involved in their maturation and thymic egress such as sphingosine-1-phosphatase lyase 1 (SGPL1), Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 1 (GDIR1), dedicator of cytokinesis protein 2 (DOCK2) and p21 protein-activated kinase 2 (PAK2)32.
In the case of B cell development, immature primary bone marrow B cells were shown to release CD24+ plasma membrane-derived EVs upon antibody-mediated engagement of CD24, and an EV-mediated exchange of CD24 was documented between populations of B cells33. As CD24 is known to have roles in B cell development and selection in the bone marrow, it was suggested that EVs potentially affect differentiating B cells. Recently, it was reported that stimulation of the B cell receptor (BCR) or CD24 on a mouse B cell lymphoma cell line with anti-IgM or with cross-linking primary and secondary antibodies, respectively, triggered the production of EVs that carried functional BCR and CD24 to recipient B cells34. This transfer allowed recipient B cells to respond to novel antigen stimulation by receiving additional BCRs and endowed these cells with sensitivity to CD24-mediated apoptosis. However, the effect of this EV-mediated BCR transfer is likely to be localized both in time and space during B cell development or activation in vivo as only a minority (5–20%) of B cells in the tested cell population were shown to gain new BCR by this mechanism34.
Antigen presentation
Demonstration of the antigen-presenting capacity of EVs was the first milestone discovery showing that EVs might have important roles in adaptive immunity. In 1996, it was shown for the first time that B cell-derived EVs carry functional peptide–MHC (pMHC) complexes and directly present antigens to T cells35. This, as well as other subsequent papers36,37,38, provided evidence for the involvement of EVs in antigen presentation (Fig. 2).
a | Extracellular vesicles (EVs) can present antigen on their surface MHC molecules directly to T cells. A more efficient form of semi-direct antigen presentation, known as cross-dressing, takes place when EVs attach to (or are possibly recycled to) the surface of dendritic cells (DCs), in which case the DC plasma membrane concentrates a large number of EV-associated peptide–MHC complexes for efficient immune synapse formation. Endocytic uptake of EVs by DCs leads to the intracellular processing of EV-associated antigens and peptides and their indirect presentation by the DC. b | Cross-presentation of MHC class I-restricted antigens to tumour-specific CD8+ T cells occurs when migratory DCs from the tumour microenvironment migrate to the draining lymph nodes and transmit tumour antigens to conventional DCs (cDCs) in the lymph nodes by synaptic vesicle transfer42. c | Cross-presentation to CD8+ T cells can also be mediated by plasmacytoid DC-derived EVs and requires the uptake of EVs by cDC1 cells43. It remains to be clarified if the cross-presentation by cDCs involves a process similar to cross-dressing or if it occurs through EV uptake and processing for indirect presentation. d | Platelet-derived EVs carry functional 20S proteasomes that can generate peptides from exogenously delivered proteins such as ovalbumin (OVA); these peptides are subsequently loaded onto the MHC class I molecules of the platelet-derived EVs and cross-presented to CD8+ T cells. Platelet-derived EVs can thus function as complex antigen-presenting units44. Platelet-derived EVs also have co-stimulatory molecules (CD40, CD40L and OX40L) on their surface. TCR, T cell receptor.
The efficacy of antigen presentation is increased if the pMHC-carrying EVs are attached to the surface of dendritic cells (DCs)39. In this case, approximately 100 times fewer DC-attached exosomes than free exosomes are required to achieve the same degree of T cell activation. The presumed mechanism is that ‘cross-dressed’ DCs concentrate a large number of EV-associated pMHCs for immune synapse formation and T cell activation (Fig. 2a). This mechanism is supported by the observation that, similarly to ‘cross-dressed’ DCs, bead-bound exosomes also induce increased activation of T cells. In addition to these mechanisms for direct and semi-direct (cross-dressing-mediated) antigen presentation by EVs, vesicles carrying pMHC as well as intact antigen can be internalized and processed efficiently by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) for indirect antigen presentation40.
Recently, the involvement of EVs in cross-presentation has attracted considerable attention. Cross-presentation of exogenous antigens on MHC class I complexes to CD8+ T cells has an important role in immunity against viruses and tumours and in the immune response upon vaccination and tolerance induction. cDCs pulsed with pMHC class I-carrying exosomes could successfully prime naive CD8+ T cells41. Furthermore, the synaptic transfer of vesicles between donor and recipient DCs through a close and sustained cell–cell association was implicated in the cross-priming of tumour-specific CD8+ T cells42 (Fig. 2b). In this case, migratory DCs carrying tumour antigens leave the tumour microenvironment and migrate to the regional lymph nodes. In the lymph nodes, these migratory DCs release EVs carrying pMHC class I complexes that can be synaptically transferred to lymph node-resident DCs. This mechanism is suggested to be a dominant pathway to load lymph node-resident DCs for antigen presentation to CD8+ T cells. Recent data have also shown the involvement of plasmacytoid DC-derived EVs in transferring antigen to cDC1 cells for cross-presentation to naive CD8+ T cells43 (Fig. 2c). It remains unclear whether plasmacytoid DC-derived EVs enable antigen presentation by cDCs through a process similar to cross-dressing or through EV uptake and processing for indirect presentation.
Finally, an interesting novel finding is that medium-sized platelet-derived EVs (microvesicles) can function as complete functional units of antigen presentation; they not only carry pMHC class I complexes and co-stimulatory molecules (CD40L, CD40 and OX40L) on their surface but also contain functional 20S proteasomes to enable peptide generation for antigen presentation. Importantly, under experimental conditions, the proteasomes of platelet-derived EVs could process exogenous antigen and load the resulting peptides onto MHC class I molecules, leading to the proliferation of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells44 (Fig. 2d). Whether EV surface-associated enzymes (such as matrix metalloproteases)22 might also have a role in the extracellular processing of antigens is yet to be established.
Immune synapses
EVs have been shown to be involved in the functions of the immune synapse formed between a lymphocyte and APC. Importantly, EVs in the immune synapse have to be distinguished from the recently identified, CD8+ T cell-derived supramolecular attack particles (which are non-EV autonomous killing particles enclosed by a thrombospondin 1 shell) that are also present in the immune synapse45.
More than 10 years ago, a one-way transfer of T cell MVB-derived EVs and their miRNA cargo to APCs was demonstrated at the site of the immune synapse46. Later, antigen-induced, T cell plasma membrane-derived EV secretion was observed at the centre of the synapse, with the released EVs being enriched in T cell receptors (TCRs). Thus, TCR sorting and release in EVs was identified as a characteristic feature of the immune synapse47,48. Recent data showed that TCR signalling-induced T cell trans-synaptic vesicles contain greater levels of immune effectors (TCR, CD40L, RNA-binding proteins and miRNAs) than do constitutively released EVs49.
T cell surface microvilli are found at the T cell–APC contact interface and were originally considered to be structures to screen and/or attach to the surface of APCs. However, recently, it was documented that these microvilli are fragmented into TCR-enriched EVs, known as T cell microvilli particles (TMPs), that are deposited onto the APC surface. CD4+ T cell-derived TMPs carry the TCR complex, co-stimulatory molecules (CD2 and CD28) and cytokines (such as IL-33, IL-4, IL-7 and TNF). TMPs were thus proposed to represent ‘immunological synaptosomes’, and it was suggested that they enable specific and rapid transfer of cargo molecules between physically interacting T cells and DCs in order to regulate the activation of DCs with minimal bystander effect50.
B cells can also establish antigen-presentation synapses with T cells. Synaptic exosomal transfer of miRNAs, such as miR-20a-5p, miR-25-3p and miR-155-3p, was documented from T cells to B cells, resulting in silencing of the genes encoding phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) and Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death (BIM; also known as BCL-2L11) in B cells. Both BIM and PTEN have crucial roles in B cell biology and in the germinal centre reaction. BIM is required for BCR activation-induced cell cycle entry and for the apoptotic killing of low-affinity BCR-expressing B cells51,52 whereas PTEN regulates the expression of IgD BCR in mature B cells and controls the germinal centre reaction53. Thus, it is suggested that the synaptic transfer of miRNA-containing exosomes from T cells to B cells has a key role in regulating germinal centre formation and antibody production54. In addition to forming antigen-presentation synapses with T cells, B cells also establish synapses with follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) for the purpose of antigen capture and/or processing. In vivo, the B cell–FDC synapse contains pMHC class II-carrying exosomes attached to the FDC surface. Given that MHC class II molecules are not expressed by FDCs, it is hypothesized that pMHC class II complexes are transferred to FDCs by EVs released by B cells and that the FDC-associated pMHC class II-carrying exosomes guide antigen-specific T cells for co-stimulation of B cell differentiation in the germinal centre55. FDCs also produce EVs known as iccosomes that are formed by the ‘beading’ of filiform dendrites of FDCs and are later coated by antigen–antibody complexes. These FDC-derived EVs are subsequently endocytosed by B cells and the antigens they carry can be processed for presentation by the B cells56.
Immune regulation
Numerous molecules known to participate in immune regulation have been identified on the surface of EVs (Fig. 3). These include the immune-checkpoint molecules cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1), the apoptosis-inducing ligand FASL (also known as CD95L), and the ectoenzymes CD39 and CD73, which generate immunosuppressive adenosine from ATP57. Regulatory T (Treg) cells release EVs that contribute to the immunosuppressive activity of these cells by various mechanisms such as by surface expression of CD73. In fact, the production of adenosine by CD73 was found to be essential for the immunoregulatory function of EVs generated by Treg cells58. Of note, the activity of Treg cell-derived EVs is also mediated by EV-associated miRNAs (such as miR155, Let7b and Let7d). The key role of miRNAs and exosomes in Treg cell-mediated suppression of CD4+ T cell responses was established using Dicer-deficient Treg cells and RAB27A and RAB27B double-deficient Treg cells, in which miRNA and exosome biogenesis were disrupted, respectively59.
Immunoregulatory molecules on the surface of extracellular vesicles (EVs), including the immune-checkpoint molecules programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and the apoptosis-inducing ligands FASL and TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL), interact with cognate ligands and receptors expressed by T cells and natural killer (NK) cells to inhibit their activity or induce apoptosis. The ectoenzymes CD39 and CD73 generate adenosine from ATP, which impairs cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses and antigen presentation by dendritic cells (DCs). Regulatory T cell-derived EVs contain EV-associated microRNAs (miRNAs) that suppress CD4+ T cell responses (such as miR-155, Let7b and Let7d) or modulate cytokine production by DCs (such as miR-150-5p and miR-142-3p). The immunosuppressive cytokine transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), which associates with betaglycan on the surface of EVs, activates regulatory T cells and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and downregulates expression of the activating receptor NKG2D on NK cells. EVs carrying MICA and MICB, which are ligands for NKG2D, can also lead to its downregulation on NK cells.
In addition to T cells, DCs are also a target for Treg cell-derived EVs. Specific miRNAs (miR-150-5p and miR-142-3p) associated with Treg cell-derived EVs modulate the cytokine production of DCs following EV uptake, leading to increased IL-10 production and decreased IL-6 production by LPS-exposed DCs. It was suggested that this could be a mechanism by which autoimmunity is prevented by tolerogenic DCs60. Also of note in relation to EV-mediated immunosuppression is that tumour cell-derived EVs (exosomes) carry PDL1 and inhibit PD1-expressing CD8+ T cells61.
The immunoregulatory role of stem cell-derived EVs deserves particular attention. We discuss later how this feature of stem cell-derived and progenitor cell-derived EVs is being exploited in EV-based therapeutic approaches. Stem cell-derived and progenitor cell-derived EVs have been shown to inhibit the functions of a wide range of immune cells (including T cells and B cells, natural killer (NK) cells, DCs, and monocytes and macrophages)62. The mechanisms by which stem cell-derived EVs exert these functions include the induction of T cell apoptosis via adenosine A2A receptor, transfer of miR-155-5p to B cells and downregulation of the PI3K–AKT pathway, suppression of NK cells by transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) mediating downstream signalling through SMAD2 and SMAD3, upregulation of miR-146a expression and downregulation of FAS (also known as CD95) expression in DCs, or miR-182-mediated targeting of the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)–NF-κB–PI3K–AKT pathway in macrophages62. There is increasing interest in harnessing these EVs as therapeutic tools in inflammatory diseases.
EV-mediated immune regulation is also implicated in gestational immunology with respect to the maintenance of immune tolerance to the semi-allogeneic fetus. In healthy pregnancy, syncytiotrophoblast-derived EVs contribute to normal immunosuppression at the fetal–maternal interface in multiple ways: they carry ligands for the activating receptor NKG2D on NK cells, such as MICA, MICB and UL16 binding proteins, resulting in the downregulation of NKG2D63; they carry the pro-apoptotic proteins FASL and TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL)64; and they promote Treg cell development through HSPE1 and their miRNA cargo65.
As described above, EVs function in key innate, adaptive and regulatory immune processes, which leads to the question of whether these EV-mediated basic immune functions are involved in protective and pathological immune responses in health and disease. Next, we discuss the implications of these functions in responses to particular types of stimuli and in particular disease processes.
Antimicrobial responses
The release of EVs is evolutionarily conserved from Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, fungi and parasites to humans66. Here, we focus on how microbial EVs are recognized by immune cells to activate a host immune response and, conversely, how protection from immune attack can be mediated by microbial EVs. We also discuss the important role of neutrophil-derived EVs in antimicrobial immunity.
Immune activation by microbial EVs
The release of EVs by microorganisms serves their biological interest, for example, by enabling rapid membrane remodelling, providing decoys for infection by bacteriophages, protecting against virulence factors and facilitating bacterial spread. However, microbial EVs can also have pro-inflammatory effects in the infected host. Microbial EVs are carriers of microorganism-associated molecular patterns that activate host innate immune responses through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs)67. Overall, the evolutionary costs related to the immunogenicity of microbial EVs must be counterbalanced by benefits to the microorganism of EV emission68. Of note, in addition to EVs released by the microorganisms themselves, EVs secreted by infected cells also carry microbial molecules, which could have indirect effects on the immune response69.
The outer membrane vesicles released by Gram-negative bacteria have, among other functions, roles in quorum sensing and horizontal gene transfer, and they carry toxins and other virulence factors. They can activate various PRRs, such as nucleotide binding oligomerization domain containing protein 1 (NOD1), NOD2 and NLRP3, through their LPS and peptidoglycan molecules67. Additional microorganism-associated molecular patterns related to certain bacterial EVs include lipid A, flagellin, PorB and vesicle surface-associated DNA70.
Despite their thick cell walls, Gram-positive bacteria, mycobacteria and fungi also release EVs that can induce innate immune responses66. For example, the Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus releases EVs that carry DNA, RNA and peptidoglycans, and that are recognized by PRRs such as TLR2, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9 and NOD2. This recognition ultimately leads to the autophagosomal degradation of EVs71. The surface glycans of fungal EVs are also PRR ligands, as are the metalloproteinase GP63 and thrombospondin 1 (TSP1) on parasite-derived EVs70. EV-associated DNA released by the parasite Plasmodium falciparum, which infects red blood cells, can activate the cytosolic stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway in monocytes that take up the parasite-derived EVs, thereby activating these innate immune cells72. A systemic role for extracellular gut microbiota-derived EVs in peripheral activation of the cGAS–STING–type I interferon axis has recently been identified, whereby DNA associated with commensal-derived EVs is present in the circulation and supports host resistance to infections by DNA and RNA viruses73.
EV-mediated protection from immune attack
Viruses do not release EVs but can rather hide from the immune system and spread between cells as a cargo of EVs. For example, naked viruses (such as the Picornaviridae and Herpesviridae families) can be released by cells inside EVs and are thus shielded against extracellular immune recognition74. Of note, it is not only single virus particles that can be encapsulated in EVs — the en bloc release of large, membrane-cloaked virus clusters also enables viruses to hide from immune recognition13.
Another example of EV-based protection of pathogens is related to defence against the complement system. Mammalian EVs have been shown to remove membrane attack complexes from EV-releasing cells to prevent complement-mediated killing of these cells75,76. In a similar manner, microbial EVs are also expected to help protect against complement-mediated lysis of the microorganism. Indeed, outer membrane vesicles were shown to protect Gram-negative pathogens against membrane attack complex-mediated lysis77. Of note, bacterial EVs can similarly protect against antimicrobial peptides and antibiotics as shown, for example, for Escherichia coli-derived EVs in the presence of the antibiotics polymyxin B or colistin (also known as polymyxin E)78.
Neutrophil-derived EVs in innate immunity
Neutrophils are the most abundant circulating leukocytes and they have a key role in the first line of defence upon infection. Neutrophils release a broad spectrum of EVs79, the composition of which depends on the environmental conditions at the time of EV production80. Of note, the same population of neutrophils can secrete either pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory EVs, with clustering of the complement receptor Mac1 (CD11B–CD18) on neutrophils functioning as a switch from anti-inflammatory to pro-inflammatory EV production81. Stimulation of neutrophils by opsonized particles induces the release of bacteriostatic EVs, which form large aggregates with bacteria82. Furthermore, EVs from neutrophils stimulated with N-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine, a chemotactic factor produced by bacteria, prime resting naive neutrophils for NADPH oxidase activity and enhance their phagocytic capacity83. Upon non-lytic NETosis, which involves the expulsion of nuclear chromatin and granules, anucleated, membrane-enclosed large remnants of neutrophils (cytoplasts) are left behind. In the broad sense, cytoplasts can be considered as very large EVs. However, unlike other EVs, cytoplasts have migratory and phagocytic capacity84.
Recent research has identified novel types of neutrophil-derived EV. When rolling on endothelial surfaces, neutrophils leave behind tethers that break off and give rise to elongated neutrophil-derived structures (ENDs) that ultimately become spherical. The membrane integrity of these ENDs is increasingly lost over time in vitro, such that they gradually release the S100A8–S100A9 complex, which is highly expressed by neutrophils and is known to stimulate leukocyte recruitment and cytokine secretion. As a result of their delayed release of S100A8–S100A9, ENDs may contribute to the inflammatory process in patients with sepsis, who have approximately 100-fold higher levels of ENDs in plasma compared with healthy controls85. Furthermore, a non-conventional exosome biogenesis pathway was identified in activated neutrophils. In these cells, leukotriene B4-containing EVs are generated by budding of the nuclear envelope, which is dependent on activation of neutral sphingomyelinase 1 and the generation of ceramide-rich microdomains in the nuclear envelope11.
Allergic responses
EVs are implicated in allergic responses both as carriers of allergens and as modulators of the allergic response. EVs can become airborne owing to their small size and, thus, can be inhalable carriers of allergens. For example, allergen-carrying ‘pollensomes’ are naturally released by pollens of olive and ryegrass86. Furthermore, host cell-derived EVs can present allergens to the immune system. DC-derived EVs were shown to present the major cat allergen Fel d 1 and to induce allergic responses87. Moreover, EVs in the plasma of individuals with allergic rhinitis carry significantly larger amounts of the house dust mite allergen Der p 1 than healthy controls and plasma EVs from these individuals induce a shift towards a T helper 2 (TH2) cell response88. Early studies showed that B cell-derived EVs can present allergen peptides and induce a TH2 cell response89. Recent data have shown that IL-33, a cytokine known to induce TH2 cell differentiation, is released by airway epithelial cells on the surface of exosomes90. In individuals with asthma, airway epithelial cell-derived EVs and EV-associated contactin 1 were identified as inducers of DC recruitment and activators of monocyte-derived DCs91.
Mast cells are key players in allergic responses. Mast cell-derived EVs are decorated by FcεRI–IgE complexes92, and their presence in the circulation is characteristic for individuals with atopy. IgE-activated mast cells secrete EVs that are internalized by IL-33 pre-activated type 2 innate lymphoid cells, leading to the production of IL-5. This effect of mast cell-derived EVs on type 2 innate lymphoid cells has been attributed to the miRNA miR103a-3p, which is enriched in mast cell-derived EVs. Bone marrow mast cell-derived EVs also induce the differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells to TH2 cells, in part as a consequence of the ligation of OX40 present on T cells by OX40L on mast cell-derived EVs93.
Autoimmunity and transplantation
EVs carry numerous autoantigens that are implicated in autoimmune diseases, such as DNA and nucleosomes, DEK, α-enolase, citrullinated proteins, Sjögren syndrome-related antigen A (SSA; also known as Ro or TRIM21), Sjögren syndrome-related antigen B (SSB; also known as La) and Smith antigen (Sm)94,95. EVs released by activated or stressed cells or by microorganisms may therefore function as autoimmune triggers. A large amount of data has accumulated to suggest that EVs can activate several inflammatory pathways. For example, circulating EVs isolated from patients with dermatomyositis triggered pro-inflammatory cytokine production, including type I interferon production, through activation of the STING pathway by EV-associated double-stranded DNA96. However, it is yet to be clarified to what extent EVs participate in triggering or maintaining progression in different autoimmune diseases. Recently, an EV-mediated pathway by which self-tolerance might be breached was suggested. More than half of patients with sporadic systemic lupus erythematosus associated with nephritis have decreased activity of the deoxyribonuclease DNASE1L3 in the circulation as a result of neutralizing autoantibodies to this enzyme, which leads to reduced clearance of degraded self-DNA. Importantly, these patients also had increased amounts of cell-free DNA associated with EVs, suggesting a potential role of EVs in triggering and stimulating autoimmunity97. Moreover, given that EVs can cross biological barriers, such as the blood–brain barrier98 or the blood–testis barrier99, and certain EVs have immunoregulatory properties, they are attractive candidates for the therapy of autoimmune diseases.
In addition to their proposed role in autoimmunity, EVs also have an important role in the immune response to transplantation. Donor-derived EVs carrying MHC molecules can induce semi-direct allograft rejection by cross-dressing APCs of the host100,101,102. This process may be of particular importance given that donor APC-derived EVs can leave the graft before it is vascularized and thus before donor APCs can enter the systemic circulation. Thus, EVs may be early inducers of graft rejection. For example, apoptotic exosome-like vesicles can induce autoantibodies to the basement membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan perlecan (also known as HSPG2) in naive mice; these antibodies are known to be involved in graft rejection and, indeed, increased perlecan-specific antibody production results in allograft inflammation in mice transplanted with MHC-mismatched aortic grafts103. Importantly, profiling of circulating EVs may predict transplant rejection104. Indeed, the number of donor-derived exosomes in peripheral blood samples could indicate early rejection with high specificity and sensitivity in a mouse model of heterotopic heart transplantation105.
Overall, these examples illustrate that EVs are strongly implicated in autoimmunity and transplant rejection primarily by carrying self or donor antigens and activating inflammatory pathways.
Antitumour responses
Probably the most highly studied area in the field of EV-associated immune responses is antitumour immunity. A large and rapidly growing body of evidence suggests that tumour cell-derived EVs interact with cells of the immune system in the tumour microenvironment, with an important role for EV-encapsulated miRNAs. We do not discuss the involvement of miRNAs in detail here and, instead, refer readers to a recent review of the topic106. Tumour cell-derived EVs mainly suppress antitumour immune responses through their effects on NK cells, T cells, DCs, macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory B cells. Immune cell-derived EVs released by tumour-associated macrophages, DCs, Treg cells, NK cells, B cells and T cells are also involved in antitumour immunity107.
Tumour cell-derived EVs carry a set of immunoregulatory molecules by which they mediate immunosuppression. They carry FASL and PDL1 and can induce the death of T cells and NK cells through the FAS–FASL and PD1–PDL1 pathways. They also carry the immunosuppressive cytokine TGFβ, which is associated with betaglycan (also known as TGFBR3) on the surface of EVs22. Treg cells can be activated by EV-associated TGFβ1 and/or IL-10 (ref.108), and MDSCs can be activated by TGFβ and prostaglandin E2 (ref.109). Tumour cell-derived EVs also inhibit the maturation of DCs by inducing the production of IL-6 (ref.110), inhibit NK cell responses by downregulating NKG2D expression on NK cells via EV-associated TGFβ1 (ref.111), and induce apoptosis of CD8+ T cells via EV-associated FASL, TRAIL or PDL1 (refs.112,113). A characteristic effect of tumour cell-derived EVs is the induction of a shift in polarization of macrophages to an M2-type phenotype by EV-associated miR-145 through the downregulated expression of histone deacetylase 11 (ref.114). Arginase 1, HSP27, HSP72, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, galectin 9 and several non-coding RNAs also contribute to the immunosuppressive effects of tumour cell-derived EVs115. Furthermore, both the EV-associated adenosine-generating ectoenzymes (CD39 and CD73) and the adenosine cargo of EVs are considered key mediators of immunosuppression in the tumour microenvironment116.
EV-associated immune-checkpoint molecules (such as PDL1) may interfere with antitumour immunity and response to immunotherapy (as reviewed recently117). For example, in patients with melanoma, tumour cells led to systemic suppression of immune functions through exosomal PDL1 (ref.61). Moreover, there is evidence that tumour-derived EVs may have unexpected effects on the antiviral immunity of patients with cancer by transferring growth factor receptors of the tumour to a select group of leukocytes. In epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive lung cancer, tumour cell-derived EVs transfer activated EGFR molecules to host macrophages, in which EGFR activates mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 2 (MEKK2) to negatively regulate the antiviral immune response. This mechanism may partly explain the immunocompromised status of patients with cancer118.
Tumour-infiltrating Treg cells are regulated by a balance of two endosomal processes in DCs, both being mediated by tumour cell-derived EVs. Binding of EV-derived RNA to endosomal TLR3 in DCs induces IFNβ production, which increases the number of Treg cells and promotes tumour development, whereas EV-associated phosphatidylserine interacts with CD300A of DCs to inhibit TLR3 signalling and reduce the number of Treg cells119. Higher expression levels of CD300A on DCs were associated with a decreased number of tumour-infiltrating Treg cells and longer survival time in patients with melanoma. Thus, tumour cell-derived EVs and CD300A of DCs have important roles in the regulation of tumour-infiltrating Treg cells and antitumour immunity.
Of note, under adverse conditions in the tumour microenvironment, such as during hypoxia or nutrient restriction, adaptive ‘immunogenic stress’ responses of tumour cells are induced (including autophagy, endoplasmic reticulum stress and the DNA damage response), which increase the release of EVs with an altered molecular composition. These tumour cell-derived EVs are carriers of DAMPs such as HMGB1, HSPs, ATP and mitochondrial DNA, which may facilitate immune recognition of the tumour by creating an inflammatory environment. Cancer-derived EVs also carry tumour-associated antigens, which, upon uptake by APCs, may stimulate tumour-specific CD8+ T cells14.
Therapeutic potential
In the past few years, the therapeutic potential of EVs has been the focus of intense research. Currently, EVs are broadly being considered as potential immune therapies for several clinical conditions having immune or inflammatory components (Table 2), including, recently, COVID-19 (Box 2). In addition to their potential functions as therapeutic tools and delivery vehicles, EVs might also be exploited as biomarkers for disease and therapy monitoring (Box 3).
The first breakthrough observation that EVs might be used therapeutically was that EVs derived from DCs pulsed with tumour peptides could promote the elimination of established tumours in mice by inducing a CD8+ T cell response120. The ability of microbial EVs to induce STING activation inspired a recent cancer therapeutic approach in which engineered EVs carrying the STING agonist cyclic GMP–AMP were successfully used to enhance antitumour immunity and decrease tumour growth121.
Among the current EV-based immunotherapeutic approaches, stem cell-derived EVs with immunoregulatory effects are taking the lead, mainly involving EVs derived from mesenchymal stem cells. In addition to their tissue repair-promoting properties, these EVs have a broad immunosuppressive potential. As discussed above for tumour cell-derived EVs, EVs derived from stem cells and progenitor cells also inhibit NK cell responses as well as DC maturation and activation, induce M2-type macrophage polarization, promote Treg cell differentiation, and inhibit B cell proliferation and differentiation. Furthermore, their immunotherapeutic potential has been confirmed in a wide range of experimental disease models, for example in experimental models of asthma, graft-versus-host disease, type 1 diabetes, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis, experimental autoimmune uveitis, acute respiratory distress syndrome and collagen-induced arthritis (recently reviewed elsewhere122). EVs isolated from milk, such as cow milk, also hold promise as future therapeutic agents. Milk-derived EVs have immunomodulatory functions and alleviate dextran sulfate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis in mice by blocking the TLR4–NF-κB and NLRP3 pathways, re-establishing the balance between Treg cells and inflammatory TH17 cells, and increasing the relative abundance of some beneficial gut bacteria123.
Importantly, EVs can also be used for vaccine formulation. In particular, the outer membrane vesicles of Gram-negative bacteria are a promising vaccine development platform. These vesicles have an optimal size for uptake by immune cells and carry TLR-activating molecules, such as LPS, to stimulate an innate immune response. Potential benefits of bacterial vesicle-based vaccines include simplicity and low cost of manufacture, potential representation of several antigenic molecules, which reduces the risk of the emergence of escape variants, natural orientation of surface-expressed antigens, stability, and the possibility to be genetically engineered. The immunogenicity of outer membrane vesicles has already been harnessed in two licensed vaccines against Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B124,125: Bexsero®, developed by Novartis, and VA-MENGOC-BC®, developed by the Finlay institute in Cuba66. Another example of how bacterial EVs can be harnessed for therapeutic purposes is the use of probiotic-derived EVs, for example from Bifidobacterium longum, Clostridium butyricum and Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. These EVs stimulate innate immune cells to produce TNF and IL-6, suggesting that probiotic EVs might have use as novel vaccine adjuvants126.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-derived EVs have also attracted significant attention recently (Fig. 4a). These EVs express high levels of perforin and granzyme B as well as CARs, and thus can induce the death of tumour cells expressing their cognate antigen. Importantly, they have therapeutic potential even in the case of solid tumours, where the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy is limited by the poor penetration of the tumours by CAR T cells. By contrast, EVs, owing to their small size and their ability to cross biological barriers, can achieve efficient penetration of solid tumours. Unlike CAR T cells, CAR T cell-derived EVs do not have PD1 on their surface and, thus, their antitumour effect is not reduced by recombinant PDL1 therapy127. In a recent approach, CAR T cells were engineered to express the endogenous non-coding RNA RN7SL1 at high levels (Fig. 4b), which activates signalling through the PRRs retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5). The efficient uptake of CAR T cell-derived EVs containing RN7SL1 by innate immune cells in the tumour microenvironment resulted in restricted MDSC development and decreased production of immunosupressive TGFβ by myeloid cells as well as in increased co-stimulation by DC subsets. In this study, in addition to the proliferation and effector-memory differentiation of CAR T cells promoted by RN7SL1, the immunostimulatory activity of CAR T cell-derived EVs substantially supported the activity of CAR T cells, resulting in the efficient rejection of solid tumours even with CAR antigen loss128. Recently, ‘smart EV’-producing cells were generated to release EVs carrying both CD62L and OX40L, which homed to the tumour-draining lymph nodes in mice, activated effector T cells and inhibited Treg cell induction129 (Fig. 4c). Another recent study generated genetically engineered multifunctional EVs carrying both surface antibodies for activating and directing T cells to kill tumour cells and immune-checkpoint modulators130. These examples suggest that EV engineering holds huge potential to develop complex EV-based immunotherapeutics for almost any pathological scenario.
a | Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells release extracellular vesicles (EVs) carrying surface CARs. These EVs also contain perforin and granzyme B and can cause tumour cell death upon recognition of the CAR-specific tumour antigen127. b | CAR T cells can be engineered to express the pattern recognition receptor agonist endogenous RN7SL1 RNA. RN7SL1-containing EVs derived from these CAR T cells are efficiently taken up by myeloid cells, in which RN7SL1 activates signalling through the pattern recognition receptors retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5). This inhibits the development of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and increases the co-stimulatory and antigen-presenting capacity of dendritic cells (DCs) in the tumour microenvironment to enhance antitumour immune responses128. c | ‘Smart EVs’ were obtained by engineering the producing cells to release EVs with exofacial CD62L (also known as L-selectin), an adhesion molecule for leukocyte homing to lymph nodes, and OX40L, a co-stimulatory molecule that suppresses the differentiation and activity of regulatory T (Treg) cells. These smart EVs home to lymph nodes upon subcutaneous injection into mice, where they interact with lymphatic endothelial cells. They also facilitate the activation of antitumour effector T cells and inhibit Treg cells through OX40–OX40L interactions in the tumour-draining lymph nodes129.
Conclusions and future directions
Research into EVs has long been hampered by conceptual and technological difficulties. Despite the significant progress that has now been made in techniques for the separation and characterization of EVs, particular attention and rigour are required when attributing specific functions to EVs2. This is particularly important given that, in the nanoparticle size range, recent research has identified the presence of extracellular non-EV particles. Nevertheless, the available data leave little or no doubt that EVs are ubiquitous key modulators of immune functions that could be exploited for biomarker or therapeutic purposes. However, many questions remain unanswered. Current gaps in our knowledge include the lack of systematic and in-depth information about the relative significance of EV-associated mediators versus soluble mediators and about the contribution of EVs to the epigenetic and metabolic changes in immunity that occur at the single-cell level. The history of immunology shows that the identification of immune cell populations and subsets was enabled by the identification of immune cell markers and marker combinations. Recent technical progress has led to the development of novel platforms by which up to 3–5 different marker molecules per single EV can be detected, which may boost the development of the EV field significantly.
Considering that cells can be genetically engineered to produce EVs that carry targeting and/or therapeutic molecules, and that these EVs can be further modified chemically and/or can be loaded with cargo, there are great opportunities for the biomedical applications of EVs. Current clinical studies reflect high expectations that EVs will be the next generation of immune therapeutics. However, although abundant preclinical data indicate the beneficial effects of EVs, results of human clinical trials are yet to come. Overcoming the current challenges related to large-scale production of EVs in compliance with Current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations will also be required for the introduction of EV products to clinical practice.
Here, we have highlighted some of the key recent advances in our understanding of the roles of EVs in the immune system. Given the complexity of the immune system, it seems likely that there will be many future EV-related discoveries together with the development of novel EV-based biomarker or therapeutic platforms.
References
Couch, Y. et al. A brief history of nearly EV-erything – the rise and rise of extracellular vesicles. J. Extracell. Vesicles 10, e12144 (2021).
Théry, C. et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 7, 1535750 (2018).
György, B. et al. Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 68, 2667–2688 (2011).
Toyofuku, M., Nomura, N. & Eberl, L. Types and origins of bacterial membrane vesicles. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 13–24 (2019).
Tulkens, J., De Wever, O. & Hendrix, A. Analyzing bacterial extracellular vesicles in human body fluids by orthogonal biophysical separation and biochemical characterization. Nat. Protoc. 15, 40–67 (2020).
Verweij, F. J. et al. The power of imaging to understand extracellular vesicle biology in vivo. Nat. Methods 18, 1013–1026 (2021).
van Niel, G. et al. Challenges and directions in studying cell-cell communication by extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 369–382 (2022).
Mathieu, M., Martin-Jaular, L., Lavieu, G. & Théry, C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 9–17 (2019).
Jeppesen, D. K. et al. Reassessment of exosome composition. Cell 177, 428–445.e18 (2019).
Barman, B. et al. VAP-A and its binding partner CERT drive biogenesis of RNA-containing extracellular vesicles at ER membrane contact sites. Dev. Cell 57, 974–994.e8 (2022).
Arya, S. B., Chen, S., Jordan-Javed, F. & Parent, C. A. Ceramide-rich microdomains facilitate nuclear envelope budding for non-conventional exosome formation. Nat. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-022-00934-8 (2022).
Valcz, G. et al. En bloc release of MVB-like small extracellular vesicle clusters by colorectal carcinoma cells. J. Extracell. Vesicles 8, 1596668 (2019).
Kerviel, A., Zhang, M. & Altan-Bonnet, N. A new infectious unit: extracellular vesicles carrying virus populations. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 37, 171–197 (2021).
Wu, Q., Zhang, H., Sun, S., Wang, L. & Sun, S. Extracellular vesicles and immunogenic stress in cancer. Cell Death. Dis. 12, 894 (2021).
Zhang, H. et al. Identification of distinct nanoparticles and subsets of extracellular vesicles by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 332–343 (2018).
Zhang, Q. et al. Supermeres are functional extracellular nanoparticles replete with disease biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 1240–1254 (2021).
Yáñez-Mó, M. et al. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J. Extracell. Vesicles 4, 27066 (2015).
Boilard, E. Extracellular vesicles and their content in bioactive lipid mediators: more than a sack of microRNA. J. Lipid Res. 59, 2037–2046 (2018).
Esser, J. U. et al. Exosomes from human macrophages and dendritic cells contain enzymes for leukotriene biosynthesis and promote granulocyte migration. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 126, 1032–1040 (2010).
Rossaint, J. et al. Directed transport of neutrophil-derived extracellular vesicles enables platelet-mediated innate immune response. Nat. Commun. 7, 13464 (2016).
Duchez, A. C. et al. Platelet microparticles are internalized in neutrophils via the concerted activity of 12-lipoxygenase and secreted phospholipase A2-IIA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E3564–E3573 (2015).
Buzás, E. I., Tóth, E. Á., Sódar, B. W. & Szabó-Taylor, K. É. Molecular interactions at the surface of extracellular vesicles. Semin. Immunopathol. 40, 453–464 (2018).
Sung, B. H., Parent, C. A. & Weaver, A. M. Extracellular vesicles: critical players during cell migration. Dev. Cell 56, 1861–1874 (2021).
Burgelman, M., Vandendriessche, C. & Vandenbroucke, R. E. Extracellular vesicles: a double-edged sword in sepsis. Pharmaceuticals 14, 829 (2021).
Tu, F. et al. Novel role of endothelial derived exosomal HSPA12B in regulating macrophage inflammatory responses in polymicrobial sepsis. Front. Immunol. 11, 825 (2020).
Shlomovitz, I. et al. Proteomic analysis of necroptotic extracellular vesicles. Cell Death Dis. 12, 1059 (2021).
Wozniak, A. L. et al. The RNA binding protein FMR1 controls selective exosomal miRNA cargo loading during inflammation. J. Cell Biol. 219, e201912074 (2020).
Budden, C. F. et al. Inflammasome-induced extracellular vesicles harbour distinct RNA signatures and alter bystander macrophage responses. J. Extracell. Vesicles 10, e12127 (2021).
Fendl, B. et al. Extracellular vesicles are associated with C-reactive protein in sepsis. Sci. Rep. 11, 6996 (2021).
Capello, M. et al. Exosomes harbor B cell targets in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and exert decoy function against complement-mediated cytotoxicity. Nat. Commun. 10, 254 (2019).
Skogberg, G. et al. Human thymic epithelial primary cells produce exosomes carrying tissue-restricted antigens. Immunol. Cell Biol. 93, 727–734 (2015).
Lundberg, V. et al. Thymic exosomes promote the final maturation of thymocytes. Sci. Rep. 6, 36479 (2016).
Ayre, D. C. et al. Dynamic regulation of CD24 expression and release of CD24-containing microvesicles in immature B cells in response to CD24 engagement. Immunology 146, 217–233 (2015).
Phan, H. D. et al. CD24 and IgM stimulation of B cells triggers transfer of functional B cell receptor to B cell recipients via extracellular vesicles. J. Immunol. 12, ji2100025 (2021).
Raposo, G. et al. B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles. J. Exp. Med. 183, 1161–1172 (1996). This hallmark paper reported the release of B cell-derived EVs with functional pMHC complexes on their surface.
Skokos, D. et al. Mast cell-derived exosomes induce phenotypic and functional maturation of dendritic cells and elicit specific immune responses in vivo. Immunology 170, 3037–3045 (2003).
Utsugi-Kobukai, S., Fujimaki, H., Hotta, C., Nakazawa, M. & Minami, M. MHC class I-mediated exogenous antigen presentation by exosomes secreted from immature and mature bone marrow derived dendritic cells. Immunol. Lett. 89, 125–131 (2003).
Qazi, K. R., Gehrmann, U., Jordö, E. D., Karlsson, M. C. I. & Gabrielsson, S. Antigen-loaded exosomes alone induce Th1-type memory through a B-cell-dependent mechanism. Blood 113, 2673–2683 (2009).
Vincent-Schneider, H. et al. Exosomes bearing HLA-DR1 molecules need dendritic cells to efficiently stimulate specific T cells. Int. Immunol. 14, 713–722 (2002).
Théry, C. et al. Indirect activation of naive CD4+ T cells by dendritic cell-derived exosomes. Nat. Immunol. 3, 1156–1162 (2002).
André, F. et al. Exosomes as potent cell-free peptide-based vaccine. I. Dendritic cell-derived exosomes transfer functional MHC class I/peptide complexes to dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 172, 2126–2136 (2004).
Balan, S. & Bhardwaj, N. Cross-presentation of tumor antigens is ruled by synaptic transfer of vesicles among dendritic cell subsets. Cancer Cell 37, 751–753 (2020).
Fu, C. et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells cross-prime naive CD8 T cells by transferring antigen to conventional dendritic cells through exosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 23730–23741 (2020).
Marcoux, G. et al. Platelet EVs contain an active proteasome involved in protein processing for antigen presentation via MHC-I molecules. Blood 138, 2607–2620 (2021). This study shows the cross-presentation capacity of platelet-derived EVs, which contain a functional proteasome.
Bálint, Š. et al. Supramolecular attack particles are autonomous killing entities released from cytotoxic T cells. Science 368, 897–901 (2020).
Mittelbrunn, M. et al. Unidirectional transfer of microRNA-loaded exosomes from T cells to antigen-presenting cells. Nat. Commun. 2, 282 (2011).
Saliba, D. G. et al. Composition and structure of synaptic ectosomes exporting antigen receptor linked to functional CD40 ligand from helper T. Elife 8, e47528 (2019).
Choudhuri, K. et al. Polarized release of T-cell-receptor-enriched microvesicles at the immunological synapse. Nature 507, 118–123 (2014).
Céspedes, P. F. et al. T-cell trans-synaptic vesicles are distinct and carry greater effector content than constitutive extracellular vesicles. Nat. Commun. 13, 3460 (2022).
Kim, H. R. et al. T cell microvilli constitute immunological synaptosomes that carry messages to antigen-presenting cells. Nat. Commun. 9, 3630 (2018).
Craxton, A., Draves, K. E. & Clark, E. A. Bim regulates BCR-induced entry of B cells into the cell cycle. Eur. J. Immunol. 37, 2715–2722 (2007).
Fischer, S. F. et al. Proapoptotic BH3-only protein Bim is essential for developmentally programmed death of germinal center-derived memory B cells and antibody-forming cells. Blood 110, 3978–3984 (2007).
Setz, C. S. et al. Pten controls B-cell responsiveness and germinal center reaction by regulating the expression of IgD BCR. EMBO J. 38, e100249 (2019).
Fernández-Messina, L. et al. Transfer of extracellular vesicle-microRNA controls germinal center reaction and antibody production. EMBO Rep. 21, e48925 (2020). This study provides evidence for an important role of EVs in the germinal centre reaction.
Denzer, K. et al. Follicular dendritic cells carry MHC class II-expressing microvesicles at their surface. J. Immunol. 165, 1259–1265 (2000).
Tew, J. G. et al. Follicular dendritic cells and presentation of antigen and costimulatory signals to B cells. Immunol. Rev. 156, 39–52 (1997).
Hofmann, L. et al. The emerging role of exosomes in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy in head and neck cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 4072 (2020).
Smyth, L. A. et al. CD73 expression on extracellular vesicles derived from CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ T cells contributes to their regulatory function. Eur. J. Immunol. 43, 2430–2440 (2013).
Okoye, I. S. et al. MicroRNA-containing T regulatory-cell-derived exosomes suppress pathogenic T helper 1 cells. Immunity 41, 89–103 (2014).
Tung, S. L. et al. Regulatory T cell derived extracellular vesicles modify dendritic cell function. Sci. Rep. 8, 6065 (2018).
Chen, G. et al. Exosomal PD-L1 contributes to immunosuppression and is associated with anti-PD-1 response. Nature 560, 382–386 (2018).
Xie, M. et al. Immunoregulatory effects of stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles on immune cells. Front. Immunol. 11, 13 (2020).
Hedlund, M. et al. Human placenta expresses and secretes NKG2D ligands via exosomes that down-modulate the cognate receptor expression: evidence for immunosuppressive function. J. Immunol. 183, 340–351 (2009).
Stenqvist, A. C. et al. Exosomes secreted by human placenta carry functional Fas ligand and TRAIL molecules and convey apoptosis in activated immune cells, suggesting exosome-mediated immune privilege of the fetus. J. Immunol. 191, 5515–5523 (2013).
Kovács, Á. F. et al. Unravelling the role of trophoblastic-derived extracellular vesicles in regulatory T cell differentiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 3457 (2019).
Brown, L., Wolf, J. M., Prados-Rosales, R. & Casadewall, A. Through the wall: extracellular vesicles in Gram-positive bacteria, mycobacteria and fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 620–630 (2015).
Johnston, E. L., Heras, B., Kufer, T. A. & Kaparakis-Liaskos, M. Detection of bacterial membrane vesicles by NOD-like receptors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1005 (2021).
McMillan, H. M. & Kuehn, M. J. The extracellular vesicle generation paradox: a bacterial point of view. EMBO J. 40, e108174 (2021).
Schorey, J. S., Cheng, Y., Singh, P. P. & Smith, V. L. Exosomes and other extracellular vesicles in host-pathogen interactions. EMBO Rep. 16, 24–43 (2015).
Kuipers, M. E., Hokke, C. H., Smits, H. H. & Nolte’t Hoen, E. N. M. Pathogen-derived extracellular vesicle-associated molecules that affect the host immune system: an overview. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2182 (2018).
Bitto, N. J. et al. Staphylococcus aureus membrane vesicles contain immunostimulatory DNA, RNA and peptidoglycan that activate innate immune receptors and induce autophagy. J. Extracell. Vesicles 10, e12080 (2021).
Sisquella, X. et al. Malaria parasite DNA-harbouring vesicles activate cytosolic immune sensors. Nat. Commun. 8, 1985 (2017).
Erttmann, S. F. et al. The gut microbiota prime systemic antiviral immunity via the cGAS-STING-IFN-I axis. Immunity 55, 847–861.e10 (2020).
van der Grein, S. G., Defourny, K. A. Y., Slot, E. F. J. & Nolte’t Hoen, E. N. M. Intricate relationships between naked viruses and extracellular vesicles in the crosstalk between pathogen and host. Semin. Immunopathol. 40, 491–504 (2018).
Pilzer, D., Gasser, O., Moskovich, O., Schifferli, J. A. & Fishelson, Z. Emission of membrane vesicles: roles in complement resistance, immunity and cancer. Springe. Semin. Immunopathol. 27, 375–387 (2005).
Stein, J. M. & Luzio, J. P. Ectocytosis caused by sublytic autologous complement attack on human neutrophils. The sorting of endogenous plasma-membrane proteins and lipids into shed vesicles. Biochem. J. 274, 381–386 (1991).
Roszkowiak, J. et al. Interspecies outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) modulate the sensitivity of pathogenic bacteria and pathogenic yeasts to cationic peptides and serum complement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 5577 (2019).
Manning, A. J. & Kuehn, M. J. Contribution of bacterial outer membrane vesicles to innate bacterial defense. BMC Microbiol. 11, 258 (2011).
Marki, A. & Ley, K. The expanding family of neutrophil-derived extracellular vesicles. Immunol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.13103 (2022).
Kolonics, F., Szeifert, V., Tímár, C. I., Ligeti, E. & Lőrincz, Á. M. The functional heterogeneity of neutrophil-derived extracellular vesicles reflects the status of the parent cell. Cells 9, 2718 (2020).
Szeifert, V. et al. Mac-1 receptor clustering initiates production of pro-inflammatory, antibacterial extracellular vesicles from neutrophils. Front. Immunol. 12, 671995 (2021).
Timár, C. I. et al. Antibacterial effect of microvesicles released from human neutrophilic granulocytes. Blood 121, 510–518 (2013).
Amjadi, M. F., Avner, B. S., Greenlee-Wacker, M. C., Horswill, A. R. & Nauseef, W. M. Neutrophil-derived extracellular vesicles modulate the phenotype of naive human neutrophils. J. Leukoc. Biol. 110, 917–925 (2021).
Yipp, B. G. et al. Infection-induced NETosis is a dynamic process involving neutrophil multitasking in vivo. Nat. Med. 18, 1386–1393 (2012).
Marki, A. et al. Elongated neutrophil-derived structures are blood-borne microparticles formed by rolling neutrophils during sepsis. J. Exp. Med. 218, e20200551 (2021).
Prado, N. et al. Pollensomes as natural vehicles for pollen allergens. J. Immunol. 195, 445–449 (2015).
Vallhov, H. et al. Dendritic cell-derived exosomes carry the major cat allergen Fel d 1 and induce an allergic immune response. Allergy 70, 1651–1655 (2015).
Fang, S. B. et al. Plasma EVs display antigen-presenting characteristics in patients with allergic rhinitis and promote differentiation of Th2 cells. Front. Immunol. 12, 710372 (2021).
Admyre, C. et al. B cell-derived exosomes can present allergen peptides and activate allergen-specific T cells to proliferate and produce TH2-like cytokines. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 120, 1418–1424 (2007).
Katz-Kiriakos, E. et al. Epithelial IL-33 appropriates exosome trafficking for secretion in chronic airway disease. JCI Insight 6, e136166 (2021).
Zhang, M. et al. Epithelial exosomal contactin-1 promotes monocyte-derived dendritic cell-dominant T-cell responses in asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 148, 1545–1558 (2021).
Molfetta, R. et al. Immune complexes exposed on mast cell-derived nanovesicles amplify allergic inflammation. Allergy 75, 1260–1263 (2020).
Li, F. et al. Mast cell-derived exosomes promote Th2 cell differentiation via OX40L-OX40 ligation. J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 3623898 (2016).
Buzas, E. I., György, B., Nagy, G., Falus, A. & Gay, S. Emerging role of extracellular vesicles in inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 10, 356–364 (2014).
Lu, M. et al. The role of extracellular vesicles in the pathogenesis and treatment of autoimmune disorders. Front. Immunol. 12, 566299 (2021).
Li, Y. et al. Plasma-derived DNA containing-extracellular vesicles induce STING-mediated proinflammatory responses in dermatomyositis. Theranostics 115, 7144–7158 (2021).
Hartl, J. et al. Autoantibody-mediated impairment of DNASE1L3 activity in sporadic systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Exp. Med. 218, e20201138 (2021).
Busatto, S., Morad, G., Guo, P. & Moses, M. A. The role of extracellular vesicles in the physiological and pathological regulation of the blood-brain barrier. FASEB Bioadv. 3, 665–675 (2021).
Ma, Y., Zhou, Y., Zou, S. S., Sun, Y. & Chen, X. F. Exosomes released from Sertoli cells contribute to the survival of Leydig cells through CCL20 in rats. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 28, gaac002 (2022).
Marino, J. et al. Donor exosomes rather than passenger leukocytes initiate alloreactive T cell responses after transplantation. Sci. Immunol. 1, aaf8759 (2016).
Liu, Q. et al. Donor dendritic cell-derived exosomes promote allograft-targeting immune response. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 2805–2820 (2016).
Morelli, A. E., Bracamonte-Baran, W. & Burlingham, W. J. Donor-derived exosomes: the trick behind the semidirect pathway of allorecognition. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 22, 46–54 (2017).
Dieudé, M. et al. The 20S proteasome core, active within apoptotic exosome-like vesicles, induces autoantibody production and accelerates rejection. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 318ra200 (2015).
Gołębiewska, J. E., Wardowska, A., Pietrowska, M., Wojakowska, A. & Dębska-Ślizień, A. Small extracellular vesicles in transplant rejection. Cells 10, 2989 (2021).
Habertheuer, A. et al. Donor tissue-specific exosome profiling enables noninvasive monitoring of acute rejection in mouse allogeneic heart transplantation. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 155, 2479–2489 (2018).
Hao, Q., Wu, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, P. & Vadgama, J. V. Tumor-derived exosomes in tumor-induced immune suppression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 1461 (2022).
Beltraminelli, T., Perez, C. R. & De Palma, M. Disentangling the complexity of tumor-derived extracellular vesicles. Cell Rep. 35, 108960 (2021).
Szajnik, M., Czystowska, M., Szczepanski, M. J., Mandapathil, M. & Whiteside, T. L. Tumor-derived microvesicles induce, expand and up-regulate biological activities of human regulatory T cells (Treg). PLoS One 5, e11469 (2010).
Xiang, X. et al. Induction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells by tumor exosomes. Int. J. Cancer 124, 2621–2633 (2009).
Yu, S. et al. Tumor exosomes inhibit differentiation of bone marrow dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 178, 6867–6875 (2007).
Clayton, A. et al. Human tumor-derived exosomes down-modulate NKG2D expression. J. Immunol. 180, 7249–7258 (2008).
Wieckowski, E. U. et al. Tumor-derived microvesicles promote regulatory T cell expansion and induce apoptosis in tumor-reactive activated CD8+ T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 183, 3720–3730 (2009).
Huber, V. et al. Human colorectal cancer cells induce T-cell death through release of proapoptotic microvesicles: role in immune escape. Gastroenterology 128, 1796–1804 (2005).
Shinohara, H. et al. Regulated polarization of tumor-associated macrophages by miR-145 via colorectal cancer-derived extracellular vesicles. J. Immunol. 199, 1505–1515 (2017).
Marar, C., Starich, B. & Wirtz, D. Extracellular vesicles in immunomodulation and tumor progression. Nat. Immunol. 22, 560–570 (2021).
Whiteside, T. L. The role of tumor-derived exosomes (TEX) in shaping anti-tumor immune competence. Cells 10, 3054 (2021).
Daassi, D., Mahoney, K. M. & Freeman, G. J. The importance of exosomal PDL1 in tumour immune evasion. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 209–215 (2020).
Gao, L. et al. Tumor-derived exosomes antagonize innate antiviral immunity. Nat. Immunol. 19, 233–245 (2018).
Nakazawa, Y. et al. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles regulate tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells via the inhibitory immunoreceptor CD300a. Elife 10, e61999 (2021).
Zitvogel, L. et al. Eradication of established murine tumors using a novel cell-free vaccine: dendritic cell-derived exosomes. Nat. Med. 4, 594–600 (1998).
McAndrews, K. M., Che, S. P. Y., LeBleu, V. S. & Kalluri, R. Effective delivery of STING agonist using exosomes suppresses tumor growth and enhances antitumor immunity. J. Biol. Chem. 296, 100523 (2021).
Shen, Z. et al. Effects of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes on autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol. 12, 749192 (2021).
Tong, L. et al. Milk-derived extracellular vesicles alleviate ulcerative colitis by regulating the gut immunity and reshaping the gut microbiota. Theranostics 11, 8570–8586 (2021).
Bai, X., Findlow, J. & Borrow, R. Recombinant protein meningococcal serogroup B vaccine combined with outer membrane vesicles. Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther. 11, 969–985 (2011).
Acevedo, R. et al. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles and vaccine applications. Front. Immunol. 5, 121 (2014).
Morishita, M. et al. Characterizing different probiotic-derived extracellular vesicles as a novel adjuvant for immunotherapy. Mol. Pharm. 18, 1080–1092 (2021).
Fu, W. et al. CAR exosomes derived from effector CAR-T cells have potent antitumour effects and low toxicity. Nat. Commun. 10, 4355 (2019).
Johnson, L. R. et al. The immunostimulatory RNA RN7SL1 enables CAR-T cells to enhance autonomous and endogenous immune function. Cell 184, 4981–4995.e14 (2021). This study shows that CAR T cells expressing the endogenous RNA RN7SL1 release this RNA in CAR-carrying EVs, which support the function of CAR T cells.
Ji, P. et al. Smart exosomes with lymph node homing and immune-amplifying capacities for enhanced immunotherapy of metastatic breast cancer. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 26, 987–996 (2021).
Cheng, Q. et al. Eliciting anti-cancer immunity by genetically engineered multifunctional exosomes. Mol. Ther. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.06.013 (2022).
Mathieu, M. et al. Specificities of exosome versus small ectosome secretion revealed by live intracellular tracking of CD63 and CD9. Nat. Commun. 12, 4389 (2021).
Cao, M. et al. Uni-directional ciliary membrane protein trafficking by a cytoplasmic retrograde IFT motor and ciliary ectosome shedding. Elife 4, e05242 (2015).
Wang, Q. & Lu, Q. Plasma membrane-derived extracellular microvesicles mediate non-canonical intercellular NOTCH signaling. Nat. Commun. 8, 709 (2017).
Rai, A. et al. Secreted midbody remnants are a class of extracellular vesicles molecularly distinct from exosomes and microparticles. Commun. Biol. 4, 400 (2021).
Di Vizio, D. et al. Large oncosomes in human prostate cancer tissues and in the circulation of mice with metastatic disease. Am. J. Pathol. 181, 1573–1584 (2012).
Atkin-Smith, G. K. et al. Plexin B2 is a regulator of monocyte apoptotic cell disassembly. Cell Rep. 29, 1821–1831.e3 (2019).
Ma, L. et al. Discovery of the migrasome, an organelle mediating release of cytoplasmic contents during cell migration. Cell Res. 25, 24–38 (2015).
Melentijevic, I. et al. C. elegans neurons jettison protein aggregates and mitochondria under neurotoxic stress. Nature 542, 367–371 (2017).
Szabó, G. T. et al. Critical role of extracellular vesicles in modulating the cellular effects of cytokines. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 4055–4067 (2014).
Wahlgren, J. et al. Activated human T cells secrete exosomes that participate in IL-2 mediated immune response signaling. PLoS One 7, e49723 (2012).
Lima, L. G. et al. Tumor microenvironmental cytokines bound to cancer exosomes determine uptake by cytokine receptor-expressing cells and biodistribution. Nat. Commun. 12, 3543 (2021).
Fitzgerald, W. et al. A system of cytokines encapsulated in extracellular vesicles. Sci. Rep. 8, 8973 (2018).
Shelke, G. V. et al. Endosomal signalling via exosome surface TGFβ-1. J. Extracell. Vesicles 8, 1650458 (2019).
Schmidt-Arras, D. & Rose-John, S. Endosomes as signaling platforms for IL-6 family cytokine receptors. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 688314 (2021).
El-Shennawy, L. et al. Circulating ACE2-expressing extracellular vesicles block broad strains of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Commun. 13, 405 (2022).
Kim, H. K. et al. Engineered small extracellular vesicles displaying ACE2 variants on the surface protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Extracell. Vesicles 11, e12179 (2022).
Cocozza, F. et al. Extracellular vesicles containing ACE2 efficiently prevent infection by SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein-containing virus. J. Extracell. Vesicles 10, e12050 (2020).
Xie, F. et al. Engineering extracellular vesicles enriched with palmitoylated ACE2 as COVID-19 therapy. Adv. Mater. 19, e2103471 (2021).
van der Ley, P. A., Zariri, A., van Riet, E., Oosterhoff, D. & Kruiswijk, C. P. An intranasal OMV-based vaccine induces high mucosal and systemic protecting immunity against a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Front. Immunol. 12, 781280 (2021).
Jiang, L. et al. A bacterial extracellular vesicle-based intranasal vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 protects against disease and elicits neutralizing antibodies to wild-type and Delta variants. J. Extracell. Vesicles 11, e12192 (2022).
Tsai, S. J. et al. Exosome-mediated mRNA delivery in vivo is safe and can be used to induce SARS-CoV-2 immunity. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 101266 (2021).
Sengupta, V. et al. Exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells as treatment for severe COVID-19. Stem Cell Dev. 29, 747–754 (2020).
Fujita, Y. et al. Early prediction of COVID-19 severity using extracellular vesicle COPB2. J. Extracell. Vesicles 10, e12092 (2021).
Uto, K. et al. Identification of Plexin D1 on circulating extracellular vesicles as a potential biomarker of polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Rheumatology 61, 1669–1679 (2021).
Garcia-Contreras, M. et al. Plasma-derived exosome characterization reveals a distinct microRNA signature in long duration type 1 diabetes. Sci. Rep. 7, 5998 (2017).
Rodríguez-Muguruza, S. et al. A serum biomarker panel of exomiR-451a, exomiR-25-3p and soluble TWEAK for early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Front. Immunol. 12, 790880 (2021).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Research, Development and Innovation Office NKFIH, Hungary, NVKP_16-1-2016-0017, the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA K120237), VEKOP-2.3.2-16-2016-000002, VEKOP-2.3.3-15-2017-00016, H2020-MSCA-ITN-2017-722148 TRAIN EV and Higher Education Excellence Program (FIKP) Therapeutic Thematic Programme. This study was supported by the Hungarian Thematic Excellence Programme No. TKP2020-NKA-26. The project has received funding from the EU’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement No. 739593.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
E.I.B. is a member of the Advisory Board of Sphere Gene Therapeutics Inc. (Boston, MA, USA).
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Immunology thanks E. Boilard, A. Morelli and F. Sánchez-Madrid for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Glossary
- Multivesicular bodies
-
(MVBs). Membrane-enclosed endosomal organelles with intraluminal vesicles formed by inward budding of the limiting membrane.
- Amphisomes
-
Hybrid organelles formed by the fusion of autophagosomes and MVBs.
- Migrasomes
-
Large extracellular vesicles with numerous small inner vesicles, formed at the tips and intersections of retraction fibres of migrating cells.
- Exophers
-
Large membrane-enclosed extracellular vesicles released by physiologically normal cells to remove damaged organelles or aggregated proteins to maintain homeostasis.
- Large oncosomes
-
Large (micrometre-sized) extracellular vesicles derived from the plasma membrane of tumour cells.
- Quorum sensing
-
A process of cell–cell communication by which bacteria share information about cell density and modify their gene expression accordingly.
- Membrane attack complexes
-
Multiprotein pore-forming complexes generated on target surfaces upon activation of the complement system.
- Dermatomyositis
-
A rare chronic inflammatory disease affecting the skin and the muscles.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Buzas, E.I. The roles of extracellular vesicles in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 23, 236–250 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-022-00763-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-022-00763-8
This article is cited by
-
Genomic communication via circulating extracellular vesicles and long-term health consequences of COVID-19
Journal of Translational Medicine (2023)
-
Proximity proteome mapping reveals PD-L1-dependent pathways disrupted by anti-PD-L1 antibody specifically in EGFR-mutant lung cancer cells
Cell Communication and Signaling (2023)
-
Circulating endothelial extracellular vesicle signatures correspond with ICU requirement: an exploratory study in COVID-19 patients
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental (2023)
-
Prognostic value of secretory autophagosomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
Biomarker Research (2023)
-
Extracellular vesicles in venous thromboembolism and pulmonary hypertension
Journal of Nanobiotechnology (2023)
