Treg cell-based therapies: challenges and perspectives

Abstract

Cellular therapies using regulatory T (Treg) cells are currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, transplant rejection and graft-versus-host disease. In this Review, we discuss the biology of Treg cells and describe new efforts in Treg cell engineering to enhance specificity, stability, functional activity and delivery. Finally, we envision that the success of Treg cell therapy in autoimmunity and transplantation will encourage the clinical use of adoptive Treg cell therapy for non-immune diseases, such as neurological disorders and tissue repair.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Mechanisms of action of effector T cells versus Treg cells.
Fig. 2: Various Treg cell products for Treg cell-based therapy.
Fig. 3: Characteristics of recombinant T cell receptors versus chimeric antigen receptors.
Fig. 4: The future of Treg cell-based therapy.

References

  1. 1.

    Edinger, M. et al. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells preserve graft-versus-tumor activity while inhibiting graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation. Nat. Med. 9, 1144–1150 (2003).

  2. 2.

    Cohen, J. L., Trenado, A., Vasey, D., Klatzmann, D. & Salomon, B. L. CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells: new therapeutics for graft-versus-host disease. J. Exp. Med. 196, 401–406 (2002).

  3. 3.

    Taylor, P. A., Lees, C. J. & Blazar, B. R. The infusion of ex vivo activated and expanded CD4+CD25+ immune regulatory cells inhibits graft-versus-host disease lethality. Blood 99, 3493–3499 (2002).

  4. 4.

    Xia, G., He, J. & Leventhal, J. R. Ex vivo-expanded natural CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells synergize with host T-cell depletion to promote long-term survival of allografts. Am. J. Transpl. 8, 298–306 (2008).

  5. 5.

    Xiao, F. et al. Ex vivo expanded human regulatory T cells delay islet allograft rejection via inhibiting islet-derived monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 production in CD34+ stem cells-reconstituted NOD-scid IL2rγnull mice. PLOS ONE 9, e90387 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Tang, Q. et al. In vitro-expanded antigen-specific regulatory T cells suppress autoimmune diabetes. J. Exp. Med. 199, 1455–1465 (2004).

  7. 7.

    Tarbell, K. V., Yamazaki, S., Olson, K., Toy, P. & Steinman, R. M. CD25+ CD4+ T cells, expanded with dendritic cells presenting a single autoantigenic peptide, suppress autoimmune diabetes. J. Exp. Med. 199, 1467–1477 (2004). Together with Tang et al. (2004), this paper shows that antigen-specific T reg cells are more potent than polyclonal T reg cells at controlling autoimmune diabetes in vivo.

  8. 8.

    Scalapino, K. J., Tang, Q., Bluestone, J. A., Bonyhadi, M. L. & Daikh, D. I. Suppression of disease in New Zealand Black/New Zealand White lupus-prone mice by adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 177, 1451–1459 (2006).

  9. 9.

    Foussat, A. et al. A comparative study between T regulatory type 1 and CD4+CD25+ T cells in the control of inflammation. J. Immunol. 171, 5018–5026 (2003).

  10. 10.

    Canavan, J. B. et al. Developing in vitro expanded CD45RA+ regulatory T cells as an adoptive cell therapy for Crohn’s disease. Gut 65, 584–594 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Kohm, A. P., Carpentier, P. A., Anger, H. A. & Miller, S. D. Cutting edge: CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress antigen-specific autoreactive immune responses and central nervous system inflammation during active experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 169, 4712–4716 (2002).

  12. 12.

    Esensten, J. H., Muller, Y. D., Bluestone, J. A. & Tang, Q. Regulatory T-cell therapy for autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases: the next frontier. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 142, 1710–1718 (2018).

  13. 13.

    Romant, M., Fanelli, Gm, Albany, C. J., Giganti, G. & Lombardi, G. Past, present, and future of regulatory T cell therapy in transplantation and autoimmunity. Front. Immunol. 10, 43 (2019).

  14. 14.

    Duggleby, R., Danby, R. D., Madrigal, J. A. & Saudemont, A. Clinical grade regulatory CD4+ T cells (Tregs): moving toward cellular-based immunomodulatory therapies. Front. Immunol. 9, 252 (2018).

  15. 15.

    Bluestone, J. A. & Tang, Q. Treg cells—the next frontier of cell therapy. Science 362, 154–155 (2018).

  16. 16.

    Tang, Q. & Vincenti, F. Transplant trials with Tregs: perils and promises. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 2505–2512 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Bluestone, J. A. et al. Type 1 diabetes immunotherapy using polyclonal regulatory T cells. Sci. Transl Med. 7, 315ra189 (2015). This paper presents results of a phase I clinical trial in which recent-onset T1D patients were given expanded polyclonal T reg cells and reports the absence of adverse events in patients and the long-term survival of the infused T reg cells in vivo, supporting the good safety profile of this approach.

  18. 18.

    Stephens, L. A., Malpass, K. H. & Anderton, S. M. Curing CNS autoimmune disease with myelin-reactive Foxp3+ Treg. Eur. J. Immunol. 39, 1108–1117 (2009).

  19. 19.

    Trenado, A. et al. Recipient-type specific CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells favor immune reconstitution and control graft-versus-host disease while maintaining graft-versus-leukemia. J. Clin. Invest. 112, 1688–1696 (2003).

  20. 20.

    Golshayan, D. et al. In vitro-expanded donor alloantigen-specific CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells promote experimental transplantation tolerance. Blood 109, 827–835 (2007).

  21. 21.

    Sagoo, P. et al. Human regulatory T cells with alloantigen specificity are more potent inhibitors of alloimmune skin graft damage than polyclonal regulatory T cells. Sci. Transl Med. 3, 83ra42 (2011).

  22. 22.

    Noyan, F. et al. Donor-specific regulatory T cells generated on donor B cells are superior to CD4+CD25high cells in controlling alloimmune responses in humanized mice. Transplant. Proc. 45, 1832–1837 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Veerapathran, A., Pidala, J., Beato, F., Yu, X. & Anasetti, C. Ex vivo expansion of human Tregs specific for alloantigens presented directly or indirectly. Blood 118, 5671–5680 (2011).

  24. 24.

    Lee, K., Nguyen, V., Lee, K., Kang, S. & Tang, Q. Attenuation of donor-reactive T cells allows effective control of allograft rejection using regulatory T cell therapy. Am. J. Transplant. 14, 27–38 (2014).

  25. 25.

    Putnam, A. L. et al. Clinical grade manufacturing of human alloantigen-reactive regulatory T cells for use in transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 13, 3010–3020 (2013).

  26. 26.

    US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01795573 (2013).

  27. 27.

    US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02244801 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Jiang, S. et al. Generation and expansion of human CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells with indirect allospecificity: potential reagents to promote donor-specific transplantation tolerance. Transplantation 82, 1738–1743 (2006).

  29. 29.

    Sakaguchi, S., Sakaguchi, N., Asano, M., Itoh, M. & Toda, M. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor α-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol. 155, 1151–1164 (1995). This article is the first demonstration that a small subset of CD4 + T cells expressing CD25 was essential for the maintenance self-tolerance.

  30. 30.

    Khattri, R., Cox, T., Yasayko, S. & Ramsdell, F. An essential role for scurfin in CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells. Nat. Immunol. 4, 337–342 (2003).

  31. 31.

    Hori, S., Nomura, T. & Sakaguchi, S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science 299, 1057–1061 (2003).

  32. 32.

    Fontenot, J. D., Gavin, M. A. & Rudensky, A. Y. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 4, 330–336 (2003). Together with Khattri et al. (2003) and Hori et al. (2003), this paper was the first to identify the transcription factor FOXP3 as a master regulator for T reg cell development and to show that ectopic expression of FOXP3 was sufficient to confer suppressive functions on conventional T cells.

  33. 33.

    Wildin, R. S. et al. X-linked neonatal diabetes mellitus, enteropathy and endocrinopathy syndrome is the human equivalent of mouse scurfy. Nat. Genet. 27, 18–20 (2001).

  34. 34.

    Brunkow, M. E. et al. Disruption of a new forkhead/winged-helix protein, scurfin, results in the fatal lymphoproliferative disorder of the scurfy mouse. Nat. Genet. 27, 68–73 (2001). Together with Wildin et al. (2001), this paper was the first to show that a defect in the FOXP3 gene was the cause of the clinical phenotypes observed in patients with IPEX and in scurfy mice.

  35. 35.

    Bennett, C. L. et al. The immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) is caused by mutations of FOXP3. Nat. Genet. 27, 20–21 (2001).

  36. 36.

    Coombes, J. L. et al. A functionally specialized population of mucosal CD103+DCs induces Foxp3+ regulatory T cells via a TGF-β and retinoic acid-dependent mechanism. J. Exp. Med. 204, 1757–1764 (2007).

  37. 37.

    Sun, C. M. et al. Small intestine lamina propria dendritic cells promote de novo generation of Foxp3 T reg cells via retinoic acid. J. Exp. Med. 204, 1775–1785 (2007).

  38. 38.

    Hsieh, C. S., Zheng, Y., Liang, Y., Fontenot, J. D. & Rudensky, A. Y. An intersection between the self-reactive regulatory and nonregulatory T cell receptor repertoires. Nat. Immunol. 7, 401–410 (2006).

  39. 39.

    Pacholczyk, R., Ignatowicz, H., Kraj, P. & Ignatowicz, L. Origin and T cell receptor diversity of Foxp3+CD4+CD25+ T cells. Immunity 25, 249–259 (2006).

  40. 40.

    Fazilleau, N., Bachelez, H., Gougeon, M. L. & Viguier, M. Cutting edge: size and diversity of CD4+CD25high Foxp3+ regulatory T cell repertoire in humans: evidence for similarities and partial overlapping with CD4+CD25 T cells. J. Immunol. 179, 3412–3416 (2007).

  41. 41.

    Lathrop, S. K. et al. Peripheral education of the immune system by colonic commensal microbiota. Nature 478, 250–254 (2011).

  42. 42.

    Yadav, M. et al. Neuropilin-1 distinguishes natural and inducible regulatory T cells among regulatory T cell subsets in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 209, 1713–1722 (2012).

  43. 43.

    Weiss, J. M. et al. Neuropilin 1 is expressed on thymus-derived natural regulatory T cells, but not mucosa-generated induced Foxp3+ T reg cells. J. Exp. Med. 209, 1723–1742 (2012).

  44. 44.

    Suffia, I. J., Reckling, S. K., Piccirillo, C. A., Goldszmid, R. S. & Belkaid, Y. Infected site-restricted Foxp3+ natural regulatory T cells are specific for microbial antigens. J. Exp. Med. 203, 777–788 (2006).

  45. 45.

    Tang, Q. et al. Visualizing regulatory T cell control of autoimmune responses in nonobese diabetic mice. Nat. Immunol. 7, 83–92 (2006).

  46. 46.

    Zhang, N. et al. Regulatory T cells sequentially migrate from inflamed tissues to draining lymph nodes to suppress the alloimmune response. Immunity 30, 458–469 (2009).

  47. 47.

    Ochando, J. C. et al. Lymph node occupancy is required for the peripheral development of alloantigen-specific Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 174, 6993–7005 (2005).

  48. 48.

    Sakaguchi, S., Wing, K., Onishi, Y., Prieto-Martin, P. & Yamaguchi, T. Regulatory T cells: how do they suppress immune responses? Int. Immunol. 21, 1105–1111 (2009).

  49. 49.

    Onishi, Y., Fehervari, Z., Yamaguchi, T. & Sakaguchi, S. Foxp3+ natural regulatory T cells preferentially form aggregates on dendritic cells in vitro and actively inhibit their maturation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10113–10118 (2008).

  50. 50.

    Grohmann, U. et al. CTLA-4-Ig regulates tryptophan catabolism in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 3, 1097–1101 (2002).

  51. 51.

    Walker, L. S. K. & Sansom, D. M. Confusing signals: recent progress in CTLA-4 biology. Trends Immunol. 36, 63–70 (2015).

  52. 52.

    Akkaya, B. et al. Regulatory T cells mediate specific suppression by depleting peptide-MHC class II from dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 20, 218–231 (2019).

  53. 53.

    Grossman, W. J. et al. Human T regulatory cells can use the perforin pathway to cause autologous target cell death. Immunity 21, 589–601 (2004).

  54. 54.

    Legoux, F. P. et al. CD4+ T cell tolerance to tissue-restricted self antigens is mediated by antigen-specific regulatory T cells rather than deletion. Immunity 43, 896–908 (2015).

  55. 55.

    Jonuleit, H. et al. Infectious tolerance: human CD25+ regulatory T cells convey suppressor activity to conventional CD4+ T helper cells. J. Exp. Med. 196, 255–260 (2002).

  56. 56.

    Dieckmann, D., Bruett, C. H., Ploettner, H., Lutz, M. B. & Schuler, G. Human CD4+CD25+ regulatory, contact-dependent T cells induce interleukin 10-producing, contact-independent type 1-like regulatory T cells [corrected]. J. Exp. Med. 196, 247–253 (2002).

  57. 57.

    Stassen, M. et al. Human CD25+ regulatory T cells: two subsets defined by the integrins α4β7 or α4β1 confer distinct suppressive properties upon CD4+ T helper cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 34, 1303–1311 (2004).

  58. 58.

    Andersson, J. et al. CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells confer infectious tolerance in a TGF-β-dependent manner. J. Exp. Med. 205, 1975–1981 (2008).

  59. 59.

    Gershon, R. K. & Kondo, K. Infectious immunological tolerance. Immunology 21, 903–914 (1971).

  60. 60.

    Zhou, P. et al. Expression of dual TCR on DO11.10 T cells allows for ovalbumin-induced oral tolerance to prevent T cell-mediated colitis directed against unrelated enteric bacterial antigens. J. Immunol. 172, 1515–1523 (2004).

  61. 61.

    Fujio, K. et al. Gene therapy of arthritis with TCR isolated from the inflamed paw. J. Immunol. 177, 8140–8147 (2006).

  62. 62.

    Wright, G. P. et al. Adoptive therapy with redirected primary regulatory T cells results in antigen-specific suppression of arthritis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19078–19083 (2009).

  63. 63.

    Tsang, J. Y. et al. Conferring indirect allospecificity on CD4+CD25+ Tregs by TCR gene transfer favours transplantation tolerance in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 3619–3628 (2008).

  64. 64.

    Kim, Y. C. et al. Engineered antigen-specific human regulatory T cells: immunosuppression of FVIII-specific T- and B cell responses. Blood 125, 1107–1115 (2015).

  65. 65.

    Kim, Y. C. et al. Engineered MBP-specific human Tregs ameliorate MOG-induced EAE through IL-2-triggered inhibition of effector T cells. J. Autoimmun. 92, 77–86 (2018).

  66. 66.

    Brusko, T. M. et al. Human antigen-specific regulatory T cells generated by T cell receptor gene transfer. PLOS ONE 5, e11726 (2010).

  67. 67.

    Yeh, W. I. et al. Avidity and bystander suppressive capacity of human regulatory T cells expressing de novo autoreactive T-cell receptors in type 1 diabetes. Front. Immunol. 8, 1313 (2017).

  68. 68.

    Hull, C. M. et al. Generation of human islet-specific regulatory T cells by TCR gene transfer. J. Autoimmun. 79, 63–73 (2017).

  69. 69.

    Plesa, G. et al. TCR affinity and specificity requirements for human regulatory T-cell function. Blood 119, 3420–3430 (2012).

  70. 70.

    Kochenderfer, J. N. et al. Eradication of B-lineage cells and regression of lymphoma in a patient treated with autologous T cells genetically engineered to recognize CD19. Blood 116, 4099–4102 (2010).

  71. 71.

    Porter, D. L., Levine, B. L., Kalos, M., Bagg, A. & June, C. H. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 725–733 (2011).

  72. 72.

    Brentjens, R. J. et al. CD19-targeted T cells rapidly induce molecular remissions in adults with chemotherapy-refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci. Transl Med. 5, 177ra38 (2013).

  73. 73.

    Grupp, S. A. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 1509–1518 (2013).

  74. 74.

    Elinav, E., Waks, T. & Eshhar, Z. Redirection of regulatory T cells with predetermined specificity for the treatment of experimental colitis in mice. Gastroenterology 134, 2014–2024 (2008). This is the first study involving mouse CAR T reg cells to show that CAR T reg cells accumulate at the site of the target antigen and are capable of bystander suppression, resulting in an amelioration of colitis in a mouse model.

  75. 75.

    Lee, J. C. et al. In vivo inhibition of human CD19-targeted effector T cells by natural T regulatory cells in a xenotransplant murine model of B cell malignancy. Cancer Res. 71, 2871–2881 (2011).

  76. 76.

    Hombach, A. A., Kofler, D., Rappl, G. & Abken, H. Redirecting human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells from the peripheral blood with pre-defined target specificity. Gene Ther. 16, 1088–1096 (2009).

  77. 77.

    MacDonald, K. G. et al. Alloantigen-specific regulatory T cells generated with a chimeric antigen receptor. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 1413–1424 (2016). This study reports the generation of human T reg cells expressing a CAR specific for HLA-A2 that were able to induce alloantigen-specific suppression in a humanized mouse model of transplantation.

  78. 78.

    Dawson, N. A. et al. Systematic testing and specificity mapping of alloantigen-specific chimeric antigen receptors in regulatory T cells. JCI Insight 4, e123672 (2019).

  79. 79.

    Noyan, F. et al. Prevention of allograft rejection by use of regulatory T cells with an MHC-specific chimeric antigen receptor. Am. J. Transplant. 17, 917–930 (2017).

  80. 80.

    Boardman, D. A. et al. Expression of a chimeric antigen receptor specific for donor HLA class I enhances the potency of human regulatory T cells in preventing human skin transplant rejection. Am. J. Transplant. 17, 931–943 (2017).

  81. 81.

    Yoon, J. et al. FVIII-specific human chimeric antigen receptor T-regulatory cells suppress T- and B cell responses to FVIII. Blood 129, 238–245 (2017).

  82. 82.

    Raffin, C. et al. Development of citrullinated-vimentin-specific CAR for targeting Tregs to treat autoimmune rheumatoid arthritis. J. Immunol. 200 (Suppl.1), 176.17 (2018).

  83. 83.

    Boroughs, A. C. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor costimulation domains modulate human regulatory T cell function. JCI Insight 5, 126194 (2019).

  84. 84.

    Watanabe, K. et al. Target antigen density governs the efficacy of anti-CD20-CD28-CD3 ζ chimeric antigen receptor-modified effector CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 194, 911–920 (2015).

  85. 85.

    Walker, A. J. et al. Tumour antigen and receptor densities regulate efficacy of a chimeric antigen receptor targeting anaplastic lymphoma kinase. Mol. Ther. 25, 2189–2201 (2017).

  86. 86.

    Fry, T. J. et al. CD22-targeted CAR T cells induce remission in B-ALL that is naive or resistant to CD19-targeted CAR immunotherapy. Nat. Med. 24, 20–28 (2018).

  87. 87.

    Gondek, D. C., Lu, L., Quezada, S. A., Sakaguchi, S. & Noelle, R. J. Cutting edge: contact-mediated suppression by CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells involves a granzyme B-dependent, perforin-independent mechanism. J. Immunol. 174, 1783–1786 (2005). This paper shows that T reg cells can exert cytolytic activity in a granzyme B-dependent manner.

  88. 88.

    Cao, X. et al. Granzyme B and perforin are important for regulatory T cell-mediated suppression of tumour clearance. Immunity 27, 635–646 (2007).

  89. 89.

    Allan, S. E. et al. Generation of potent and stable human CD4+ T regulatory cells by activation-independent expression of FOXP3. Mol. Ther. 16, 194–202 (2008).

  90. 90.

    Aarts-Riemens, T., Emmelot, M. E., Verdonck, L. F. & Mutis, T. Forced overexpression of either of the two common human Foxp3 isoforms can induce regulatory T cells from CD4+CD25 cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 38, 1381–1390 (2008).

  91. 91.

    Andersen, K. G., Butcher, T., Betz, A. G. & Marrack, P. Specific immunosuppression with inducible Foxp3-transduced polyclonal T cells. PLOS Biol. 6, e276 (2008).

  92. 92.

    Beavis, P. A. et al. Resistance to regulatory T cell-mediated suppression in rheumatoid arthritis can be bypassed by ectopic foxp3 expression in pathogenic synovial T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16717–16722 (2011).

  93. 93.

    Passerini, L. et al. CD4+ T cells from IPEX patients convert into functional and stable regulatory T cells by FOXP3 gene transfer. Sci. Transl Med. 5, 215ra174 (2013).

  94. 94.

    Samstein, R. M. et al. Foxp3 exploits a pre-existent enhancer landscape for regulatory T cell lineage specification. Cell 151, 153–166 (2012).

  95. 95.

    Morikawa, H. et al. Differential roles of epigenetic changes and Foxp3 expression in regulatory T cell-specific transcriptional regulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5289–5294 (2014).

  96. 96.

    Arvey, A. et al. Genetic and epigenetic variation in the lineage specification of regulatory T cells. eLife 4, e07571 (2015).

  97. 97.

    Cahan, P. et al. CellNet: network biology applied to stem cell engineering. Cell 158, 903–915 (2014).

  98. 98.

    Radley, A. H. et al. Assessment of engineered cells using CellNet and RNA-seq. Nat. Protoc. 12, 1089–1102 (2017).

  99. 99.

    DuPage, M. & Bluestone, J. A. Harnessing the plasticity of CD4+ T cells to treat immune-mediated disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 149–163 (2016).

  100. 100.

    Zhou, X. et al. Instability of the transcription factor Foxp3 leads to the generation of pathogenic memory T cells in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 10, 1000–1007 (2009). This paper shows that a fraction of T reg cells can lose expression of FOXP3 in autoimmune microenvironments, leading to the generation of exFoxp3 cells displaying a T effector phenotype and a pathogenic potential.

  101. 101.

    Bailey-Bucktrout, S. L. et al. Self-antigen-driven activation induces instability of regulatory T cells during an inflammatory autoimmune response. Immunity 39, 949–962 (2013).

  102. 102.

    Komatsu, N. et al. Pathogenic conversion of Foxp3+ T cells into TH17 cells in autoimmune arthritis. Nat. Med. 20, 62–68 (2014).

  103. 103.

    Noval Rivas, M. et al. Regulatory T cell reprogramming towards a Th2-cell-like lineage impairs oral tolerance and promotes food allergy. Immunity 42, 512–523 (2015).

  104. 104.

    Miyao, T. et al. Plasticity of Foxp3+ T cells reflects promiscuous Foxp3 expression in conventional T cells but not reprogramming of regulatory T cells. Immunity 36, 262–275 (2012).

  105. 105.

    Van Gool, F. et al. A mutation in the transcription factor Foxp3 drives T helper 2 effector function in regulatory T cells. Immunity 50, 362–377.e6 (2019).

  106. 106.

    DuPage, M. et al. The chromatin-modifying enzyme Ezh2 is critical for the maintenance of regulatory T cell identity after activation. Immunity 42, 227–238 (2015).

  107. 107.

    Miyara, M. et al. Combination of IL-2, rapamycin, DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibitors for the expansion of human regulatory T cells. Oncotarget 8, 104733–104744 (2017).

  108. 108.

    Kasahara, H. et al. Generation of allo-antigen-specific induced Treg stabilized by vitamin C treatment and its application for prevention of acute graft versus host disease model. Int. Immunol. 29, 457–469 (2017).

  109. 109.

    Samanta, A. et al. TGF-β and IL-6 signals modulate chromatin binding and promoter occupancy by acetylated FOXP3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14023–14027 (2008).

  110. 110.

    Gao, Z. et al. Synergy between IL-6 and TGF-β signalling promotes FOXP3 degradation. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 5, 626–633 (2012).

  111. 111.

    Kimura, A. & Kishimoto, T. IL-6: regulator of Treg/Th17 balance. Eur. J. Immunol. 40, 1830–1835 (2010).

  112. 112.

    Zhang, Q. et al. STAT3- and DNA methyltransferase 1-mediated epigenetic silencing of SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase tumour suppressor gene in malignant T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6948–6953 (2005).

  113. 113.

    Hodge, D. R. et al. IL-6 enhances the nuclear translocation of DNA cytosine-5-methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) via phosphorylation of the nuclear localization sequence by the AKT kinase. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 4, 387–398 (2007).

  114. 114.

    Goodman, W. A. et al. IL-6 signalling in psoriasis prevents immune suppression by regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 183, 3170–3176 (2009).

  115. 115.

    Fujimoto, M. et al. Interleukin-6 blockade suppresses autoimmune arthritis in mice by the inhibition of inflammatory Th17 responses. Arthritis Rheum. 58, 3710–3719 (2008).

  116. 116.

    Serada, S. et al. IL-6 blockade inhibits the induction of myelin antigen-specific Th17 cells and Th1 cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9041–9046 (2008).

  117. 117.

    Nishimoto, N. et al. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 50, 1761–1769 (2004).

  118. 118.

    Ito, H. et al. A pilot randomized trial of a human anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody in active Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 126, 989–996; discussion 947 (2004).

  119. 119.

    Illei, G. G. et al. Tocilizumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: data on safety, preliminary efficacy, and impact on circulating plasma cells from an open-label phase I dosage-escalation study. Arthritis Rheum. 62, 542–552 (2010).

  120. 120.

    Hagenstein, J. et al. A novel role for IL-6 receptor classic signalling: induction of RORγt +Foxp3+ Tregs with enhanced suppressive capacity. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 30, 1439–1453 (2019).

  121. 121.

    Abbas, A. K., Trotta, E., R Simeonov, D., Marson, A. & Bluestone, J. A. Revisiting IL-2: biology and therapeutic prospects. Sci. Immunol. 3, eaat1482 (2018).

  122. 122.

    Barron, L. et al. Cutting edge: mechanisms of IL-2-dependent maintenance of functional regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 185, 6426–6430 (2010).

  123. 123.

    Tang, Q. et al. Central role of defective interleukin-2 production in the triggering of islet autoimmune destruction. Immunity 28, 687–697 (2008).

  124. 124.

    Boardman, D. A. & Levings, M. K. Cancer immunotherapies repurposed for use in autoimmunity. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 259–263 (2019).

  125. 125.

    Yu, A., Zhu, L., Altman, N. H. & Malek, T. R. A low interleukin-2 receptor signalling threshold supports the development and homeostasis of T regulatory cells. Immunity 30, 204–217 (2009).

  126. 126.

    Yu, A. et al. Selective IL-2 responsiveness of regulatory T cells through multiple intrinsic mechanisms supports the use of low-dose IL-2 therapy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 64, 2172–2183 (2015).

  127. 127.

    Grinberg-Bleyer, Y. et al. IL-2 reverses established type 1 diabetes in NOD mice by a local effect on pancreatic regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 207, 1871–1878 (2010).

  128. 128.

    Trotta, E. et al. A human anti-IL-2 antibody that potentiates regulatory T cells by a structure-based mechanism. Nat. Med. 24, 1005–1014 (2018).

  129. 129.

    Ito, S. et al. Ultra-low dose interleukin-2 promotes immune-modulating function of regulatory T cells and natural killer cells in healthy volunteers. Mol. Ther. 22, 1388–1395 (2014).

  130. 130.

    Saadoun, D. et al. Regulatory T-cell responses to low-dose interleukin-2 in HCV-induced vasculitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 2067–2077 (2011).

  131. 131.

    Koreth, J. et al. Interleukin-2 and regulatory T cells in graft-versus-host disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 2055–2066 (2011).

  132. 132.

    Kennedy-Nasser, A. A. et al. Ultra low-dose IL-2 for GVHD prophylaxis after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation mediates expansion of regulatory T cells without diminishing antiviral and antileukemic activity. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 2215–2225 (2014).

  133. 133.

    Goettel, J. A. et al. Low-dose interleukin-2 ameliorates colitis in a preclinical humanized mouse model. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 193–195 (2019).

  134. 134.

    Castela, E. et al. Effects of low-dose recombinant interleukin 2 to promote T-regulatory cells in alopecia areata. JAMA Dermatol. 150, 748–751 (2014).

  135. 135.

    von Spee-Mayer, C. et al. Low-dose interleukin-2 selectively corrects regulatory T cell defects in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 75, 1407–1415 (2016).

  136. 136.

    Humrich, J. Y. et al. Rapid induction of clinical remission by low-dose interleukin-2 in a patient with refractory SLE. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 74, 791–792 (2015).

  137. 137.

    Hartemann, A. et al. Low-dose interleukin 2 in patients with type 1 diabetes: a phase 1/2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 1, 295–305 (2013).

  138. 138.

    US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02772679 (2016).

  139. 139.

    Laurence, A. et al. Interleukin-2 signalling via STAT5 constrains T helper 17 cell generation. Immunity 26, 371–381 (2007).

  140. 140.

    Liao, W. et al. Priming for T helper type 2 differentiation by interleukin 2-mediated induction of IL-4 receptor α chain expression. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1288–1296 (2008).

  141. 141.

    Liao, W., Lin, J., Wang, L., Li, P. & Leonard, W. J. Cytokine receptor modulation by interleukin-2 broadly regulates T helper cell lineage differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 12, 551–559 (2011).

  142. 142.

    Robb, R. J., Munck, A. & Smith, K. A. T cell growth factor receptors. Quantitation, specificity, and biological relevance. J. Exp. Med. 154, 1455–1474 (1981).

  143. 143.

    Grimm, E. A., Mazumder, A., Zhang, H. Z. & Rosenberg, S. A. Lymphokine-activated killer cell phenomenon. Lysis of natural killer-resistant fresh solid tumour cells by interleukin 2-activated autologous human peripheral blood lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 155, 1823–1841 (1982).

  144. 144.

    Siegel, J. P., Sharon, M., Smith, P. L. & Leonard, W. J. The IL-2 receptor β chain (p70): role in mediating signals for LAK, NK, and proliferative activities. Science 238, 75–78 (1987).

  145. 145.

    Roediger, B. et al. Cutaneous immunosurveillance and regulation of inflammation by group 2 innate lymphoid cells. Nat. Immunol. 14, 564–573 (2013).

  146. 146.

    Levin, A. M. et al. Exploiting a natural conformational switch to engineer an interleukin-2 ‘superkine’. Nature 484, 529–533 (2012).

  147. 147.

    Mitra, S. et al. Interleukin-2 activity can be fine tuned with engineered receptor signalling clamps. Immunity 42, 826–838 (2015).

  148. 148.

    Lotze, M. T. et al. In vivo administration of purified human interleukin 2. II. Half life, immunologic effects, and expansion of peripheral lymphoid cells in vivo with recombinant IL 2. J. Immunol. 135, 2865–2875 (1985).

  149. 149.

    Ricordi, C. & Strom, T. B. Clinical islet transplantation: advances and immunological challenges. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4, 259–268 (2004).

  150. 150.

    Millington, T. et al. Effects of an agonist interleukin-2/Fc fusion protein, a mutant antagonist interleukin-15/Fc fusion protein, and sirolimus on cardiac allograft survival in non-human primates. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 31, 427–435 (2012).

  151. 151.

    Spangler, J. B. et al. Antibodies to interleukin-2 elicit selective T cell subset potentiation through distinct conformational mechanisms. Immunity 42, 815–825 (2015).

  152. 152.

    Boyman, O., Kovar, M., Rubinstein, M. P., Surh, C. D. & Sprent, J. Selective stimulation of T cell subsets with antibody–cytokine immune complexes. Science 311, 1924–1927 (2006).

  153. 153.

    Spangler, J. B. et al. Engineering a single-agent cytokine/antibody fusion that selectively expands regulatory T cells for autoimmune disease therapy. J. Immunol. 201, 2094–2106 (2018).

  154. 154.

    Boardman, D. A. & Levings, M. K. Cancer immunotherapies repurposed for use in autoimmunity. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 259–263 (2019).

  155. 155.

    Sockolosky, J. T. et al. Selective targeting of engineered T cells using orthogonal IL-2 cytokine–receptor complexes. Science 359, 1037–1042 (2018). In this study, in order to counteract the pleiotropic effect of IL-2, the authors engineer IL-2 cytokine–receptor orthogonal pairs that can selectively interact with one another, providing a discriminating IL-2 signal to engineered T cells expressing the orthogonal IL-2R when in the presence of orthogonal IL-2 cytokine and limiting off-target effects.

  156. 156.

    Chinen, T. et al. An essential role for the IL-2 receptor in Treg cell function. Nat. Immunol. 17, 1322–1333 (2016).

  157. 157.

    Roybal, K. T. et al. Engineering T cells with customized therapeutic response programs using synthetic notch receptors. Cell 167, 419–432.e16 (2016). The authors develop a gated receptor system capable of inducing custom response programmes after recognition of a chosen antigen in primary T cells enabling a more controlled therapeutic response of the engineered T cells.

  158. 158.

    Langan, R. A. et al. De novo design of bioactive protein switches. Nature 572, 205–210 (2019).

  159. 159.

    Balashov, K. E., Rottman, J. B., Weiner, H. L. & Hancock, W. W. CCR5+ and CXCR3+ T cells are increased in multiple sclerosis and their ligands MIP-1α and IP-10 are expressed in demyelinating brain lesions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6873–6878 (1999).

  160. 160.

    Frigerio, S. et al. Beta cells are responsible for CXCR3-mediated T-cell infiltration in insulitis. Nat. Med. 8, 1414–1420 (2002).

  161. 161.

    Christen, U., McGavern, D. B., Luster, A. D., von Herrath, M. G. & Oldstone, M. B. A. Among CXCR3 chemokines, IFN-γ-inducible protein of 10 kDa (CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL) 10) but not monokine induced by IFN-γ (CXCL9) imprints a pattern for the subsequent development of autoimmune disease. J. Immunol. 171, 6838–6845 (2003).

  162. 162.

    Homey, B. et al. Up-regulation of macrophage inflammatory protein-3α/CCL20 and CC chemokine receptor 6 in psoriasis. J. Immunol. 164, 6621–6632 (2000).

  163. 163.

    Di Stasi, A. et al. T lymphocytes coexpressing CCR4 and a chimeric antigen receptor targeting CD30 have improved homing and antitumour activity in a Hodgkin tumour model. Blood 113, 6392–6402 (2009).

  164. 164.

    Craddock, J. A. et al. Enhanced tumour trafficking of GD2 chimeric antigen receptor T cells by expression of the chemokine receptor CCR2b. J. Immunother. 33, 780–788 (2010).

  165. 165.

    Moon, E. K. et al. Expression of a functional CCR2 receptor enhances tumour localization and tumour eradication by retargeted human T cells expressing a mesothelin-specific chimeric antibody receptor. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 4719–4730 (2011).

  166. 166.

    Siddiqui, I., Erreni, M., van Brakel, M., Debets, R. & Allavena, P. Enhanced recruitment of genetically modified CX3CR1-positive human T cells into Fractalkine/CX3CL1 expressing tumours: importance of the chemokine gradient. J. Immunother. Cancer 4, 21 (2016).

  167. 167.

    Garetto, S. et al. Tailored chemokine receptor modification improves homing of adoptive therapy T cells in a spontaneous tumour model. Oncotarget 7, 43010–43026 (2016).

  168. 168.

    Idorn, M. et al. Chemokine receptor engineering of T cells with CXCR2 improves homing towards subcutaneous human melanomas in xenograft mouse model. Oncoimmunology 7, e1450715 (2018).

  169. 169.

    Adachi, K. et al. IL-7 and CCL19 expression in CAR-T cells improves immune cell infiltration and CAR-T cell survival in the tumour. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 346–351 (2018).

  170. 170.

    Arai, Y. et al. Myeloid conditioning with c-kit-targeted CAR-T cells enables donor stem cell engraftment. Mol. Ther. 26, 1181–1197 (2018).

  171. 171.

    US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01740557 (2012).

  172. 172.

    Hoeppli, R. E. et al. Tailoring the homing capacity of human Tregs for directed migration to sites of Th1-inflammation or intestinal regions. Am. J. Transplant. 19, 62–76 (2019).

  173. 173.

    Wang, X. et al. A transgene-encoded cell surface polypeptide for selection, in vivo tracking, and ablation of engineered cells. Blood 118, 1255–1263 (2011).

  174. 174.

    Paszkiewicz, P. J. et al. Targeted antibody-mediated depletion of murine CD19 CAR T cells permanently reverses B cell aplasia. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 4262–4272 (2016).

  175. 175.

    Philip, B. et al. A highly compact epitope-based marker/suicide gene for easier and safer T-cell therapy. Blood 124, 1277–1287 (2014).

  176. 176.

    Mestermann, K. et al. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib acts as a pharmacologic on/off switch for CAR T cells. Sci. Transl Med. 11, eaau5907 (2019).

  177. 177.

    Roth, T. L. et al. Reprogramming human T cell function and specificity with non-viral genome targeting. Nature 559, 405–409 (2018). The authors show that the endogenous TCR locus of human T cells can be successfully replaced by a TCR of interest using CRISPR–Cas9 non-viral genome targeting to generate TCR-engineered T cells.

  178. 178.

    Eyquem, J. et al. Targeting a CAR to the TRAC locus with CRISPR/Cas9 enhances tumour rejection. Nature 543, 113–117 (2017). The authors integrate a CAR into the TRAC locus of human T cells using a CRISPR–Cas9 genome targeting approach and observe that having the CAR expression driven by the TCRα promoter enhances the performance of CAR T cells in a mouse model of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and reduces tonic CAR signalling.

  179. 179.

    Parmar, S. et al. Third-party umbilical cord blood-derived regulatory T cells prevent xenogenic graft-versus-host disease. Cytotherapy 16, 90–100 (2014).

  180. 180.

    Parmar, S. et al. Ex vivo fucosylation of third-party human regulatory T cells enhances anti-graft-versus-host disease potency in vivo. Blood 125, 1502–1506 (2015).

  181. 181.

    Gornalusse, G. G. et al. HLA-E-expressing pluripotent stem cells escape allogeneic responses and lysis by NK cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 765–772 (2017).

  182. 182.

    Jaiswal, S. et al. CD47 is upregulated on circulating haematopoietic stem cells and leukemia cells to avoid phagocytosis. Cell 138, 271–285 (2009).

  183. 183.

    Deuse, T. et al. Hypoimmunogenic derivatives of induced pluripotent stem cells evade immune rejection in fully immunocompetent allogeneic recipients. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 252–258 (2019).

  184. 184.

    Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).

  185. 185.

    Vo, L. T. & Daley, G. Q. De novo generation of HSCs from somatic and pluripotent stem cell sources. Blood 125, 2641–2648 (2015).

  186. 186.

    Timmermans, F. et al. Generation of T cells from human embryonic stem cell-derived haematopoietic zones. J. Immunol. 182, 6879–6888 (2009).

  187. 187.

    Kennedy, M. et al. T lymphocyte potential marks the emergence of definitive haematopoietic progenitors in human pluripotent stem cell differentiation cultures. Cell Rep. 2, 1722–1735 (2012).

  188. 188.

    Nishimura, T. et al. Generation of rejuvenated antigen-specific T cells by reprogramming to pluripotency and redifferentiation. Cell Stem Cell 12, 114–126 (2013).

  189. 189.

    Themeli, M. et al. Generation of tumour-targeted human T lymphocytes from induced pluripotent stem cells for cancer therapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 928–933 (2013).

  190. 190.

    Vo, L. T. et al. Regulation of embryonic haematopoietic multipotency by EZH1. Nature 553, 506–510 (2018).

  191. 191.

    Vizcardo, R. et al. Regeneration of human tumour antigen-specific T cells from iPSCs derived from mature CD8+ T cells. Cell Stem Cell 12, 31–36 (2013).

  192. 192.

    Riolobos, L. et al. HLA engineering of human pluripotent stem cells. Mol. Ther. 21, 1232–1241 (2013).

  193. 193.

    Torikai, H. et al. Towards eliminating HLA class I expression to generate universal cells from allogeneic donors. Blood 122, 1341–1349 (2013).

  194. 194.

    Arpaia, N. et al. A distinct function of regulatory T cells in tissue protection. Cell 162, 1078–1089 (2015).

  195. 195.

    Nosbaum, A. et al. Cutting edge: regulatory T cells facilitate cutaneous wound healing. J. Immunol. 196, 2010–2014 (2016).

  196. 196.

    Zhang, C. et al. ‘Repair’ Treg cells in tissue injury. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 43, 2155–2169 (2017).

  197. 197.

    Sharma, A. & Rudra, D. Emerging functions of regulatory T cells in tissue homeostasis. Front. Immunol. 9, 883 (2018).

  198. 198.

    Baek, H. et al. Neuroprotective effects of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in a 3xTg-AD Alzheimer disease model. Oncotarget 7, 69347–69357 (2016).

  199. 199.

    Dansokho, C. et al. Regulatory T cells delay disease progression in Alzheimer-like pathology. Brain 139, 1237–1251 (2016).

  200. 200.

    US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03241784 (2017).

  201. 201.

    Thonhoff, J. R. et al. Expanded autologous regulatory T lymphocyte infusions in ALS: a phase I, first-in-human study. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 5, e465 (2018).

  202. 202.

    Shifrut, E. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screens in primary human T cells reveal key regulators of immune function. Cell 175, 1958–1971.e15 (2018).

  203. 203.

    Young, A., Quandt, Z. & Bluestone, J. A. The balancing act between cancer immunity and autoimmunity in response to immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Res. 6, 1445–1452 (2018).

  204. 204.

    Baron, U. et al. DNA demethylation in the human FOXP3 locus discriminates regulatory T cells from activated FOXP3+ conventional T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 37, 2378–2389 (2007).

  205. 205.

    Floess, S. et al. Epigenetic control of the foxp3 locus in regulatory T cells. PLOS Biol. 5, e38 (2007).

  206. 206.

    Polansky, J. K. et al. DNA methylation controls Foxp3 gene expression. Eur. J. Immunol. 38, 1654–1663 (2008).

  207. 207.

    Toker, A. et al. Active demethylation of the Foxp3 locus leads to the generation of stable regulatory T cells within the thymus. J. Immunol. 190, 3180–3188 (2013).

  208. 208.

    Liu, W. et al. CD127 expression inversely correlates with FoxP3 and suppressive function of human CD4+ Treg cells. J. Exp. Med. 203, 1701–1711 (2006). This paper identifies CD127 as a biomarker that discriminates human T reg cells (CD127 −/low) from CD4 + conventional T cells (CD127 +) in the peripheral blood and that, when combined with the surface marker CD25, enables the enrichment of T reg cells with high purity.

  209. 209.

    Kleinewietfeld, M. et al. CD49d provides access to “untouched” human Foxp3+ Treg free of contaminating effector cells. Blood 113, 827–836 (2009).

  210. 210.

    Valmori, D., Merlo, A., Souleimanian, N. E., Hesdorffer, C. S. & Ayyoub, M. A peripheral circulating compartment of natural naive CD4 Tregs. J. Clin. Invest. 115, 1953–1962 (2005).

  211. 211.

    Miyara, M. et al. Functional delineation and differentiation dynamics of human CD4+ T cells expressing the FoxP3 transcription factor. Immunity 30, 899–911 (2009).

  212. 212.

    Hoffmann, P. et al. Only the CD45RA+ subpopulation of CD4+CD25high T cells gives rise to homogeneous regulatory T-cell lines upon in vitro expansion. Blood 108, 4260–4267 (2006).

  213. 213.

    Donnelly, C. et al. Optimizing human Treg immunotherapy by Treg subset selection and E-selectin ligand expression. Sci. Rep. 8, 420 (2018).

  214. 214.

    Booth, N. J. et al. Different proliferative potential and migratory characteristics of human CD4+ regulatory T cells that express either CD45RA or CD45RO. J. Immunol. 184, 4317–4326 (2010).

  215. 215.

    Feuerer, M. et al. Lean, but not obese, fat is enriched for a unique population of regulatory T cells that affect metabolic parameters. Nat. Med. 15, 930–939 (2009).

  216. 216.

    Clark, R. A. & Kupper, T. S. IL-15 and dermal fibroblasts induce proliferation of natural regulatory T cells isolated from human skin. Blood 109, 194–202 (2007).

  217. 217.

    Scharschmidt, T. et al. A wave of regulatory T cells into neonatal skin mediates tolerance to commensal microbes. Immunity 43, 1011–1021 (2015).

  218. 218.

    Burzyn, D. et al. A special population of regulatory T cells potentiates muscle repair. Cell 155, 1282–1295 (2013).

  219. 219.

    Villalta, S. A. et al. Regulatory T cells suppress muscle inflammation and injury in muscular dystrophy. Sci. Transl Med. 6, 258ra142 (2014).

  220. 220.

    Sefik, E. et al. Mucosal immunology. Individual intestinal symbionts induce a distinct population of RORγ+ regulatory T cells. Science 349, 993–997 (2015).

  221. 221.

    Tilburgs, T. et al. Evidence for a selective migration of fetus-specific CD4+CD25bright regulatory T cells from the peripheral blood to the decidua in human pregnancy. J. Immunol. 180, 5737–5745 (2008).

  222. 222.

    Samstein, R. M., Josefowicz, S. Z., Arvey, A., Treuting, P. M. & Rudensky, A. Y. Extrathymic generation of regulatory T cells in placental mammals mitigates maternal–fetal conflict. Cell 150, 29–38 (2012).

  223. 223.

    Cipolletta, D. et al. PPAR-γ is a major driver of the accumulation and phenotype of adipose tissue Treg cells. Nature 486, 549–553 (2012).

  224. 224.

    Sanchez Rodriguez, R. et al. Memory regulatory T cells reside in human skin. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 1027–1036 (2014).

  225. 225.

    Delacher, M. et al. Genome-wide DNA-methylation landscape defines specialization of regulatory T cells in tissues. Nat. Immunol. 18, 1160–1172 (2017).

  226. 226.

    DiSpirito, J. R. et al. Molecular diversification of regulatory T cells in nonlymphoid tissues. Sci. Immunol. 3, eaat5861 (2018).

  227. 227.

    Schneider, A. et al. The effector T cells of diabetic subjects are resistant to regulation via CD4+FOXP3+ Treg cells. J. Immunol. 181, 7350–7355 (2008).

  228. 228.

    Buckner, J. H. & Nepom, G. T. Obstacles and opportunities for targeting the effector T cell response in type 1 diabetes. J. Autoimmun. 71, 44–50 (2016).

  229. 229.

    Piguet, P. F. et al. Evolution of collagen arthritis in mice is arrested by treatment with antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) antibody or a recombinant soluble TNF receptor. Immunology 77, 510–514 (1992).

  230. 230.

    Mori, L., Iselin, S., De Libero, G. & Lesslauer, W. Attenuation of collagen-induced arthritis in 55-kDa TNF receptor type 1 (TNFR1)-IgG1-treated and TNFR1-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 157, 3178–3182 (1996).

  231. 231.

    Kontoyiannis, D., Pasparakis, M., Pizarro, T. T., Cominelli, F. & Kollias, G. Impaired on/off regulation of TNF biosynthesis in mice lacking TNF AU-rich elements: implications for joint and gut-associated immunopathologies. Immunity 10, 387–398 (1999).

  232. 232.

    Barton, A., John, S., Ollier, W. E., Silman, A. & Worthington, J. Association between rheumatoid arthritis and polymorphism of tumour necrosis factor receptor II, but not tumour necrosis factor receptor I, in Caucasians. Arthritis Rheum. 44, 61–65 (2001).

  233. 233.

    Dieudé, P. et al. Association between tumour necrosis factor receptor II and familial, but not sporadic, rheumatoid arthritis: evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Arthritis Rheum. 46, 2039–2044 (2002).

  234. 234.

    Komata, T., Tsuchiya, N., Matsushita, M., Hagiwara, K. & Tokunaga, K. Association of tumour necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2) polymorphism with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus. Tissue Antigens 53, 527–533 (1999).

  235. 235.

    Sashio, H. et al. Polymorphisms of the TNF gene and the TNF receptor superfamily member 1B gene are associated with susceptibility to ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, respectively. Immunogenetics 53, 1020–1027 (2002).

  236. 236.

    Annunziato, F. et al. Phenotype, localization, and mechanism of suppression of CD4+CD25+ human thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 196, 379–387 (2002).

  237. 237.

    Nagar, M. et al. TNF activates a NF-κB-regulated cellular program in human CD45RA regulatory T cells that modulates their suppressive function. J. Immunol. 184, 3570–3581 (2010).

  238. 238.

    Chen, X. et al. TNFR2 is critical for the stabilization of the CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T. cell phenotype in the inflammatory environment. J. Immunol. 190, 1076–1084 (2013).

  239. 239.

    Okubo, Y., Mera, T., Wang, L. & Faustman, D. L. Homogeneous expansion of human T-regulatory cells via tumour necrosis factor receptor 2. Sci. Rep. 3, 3153 (2013).

Download references

Author information

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Correspondence to Jeffrey A. Bluestone.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.A.B. is a stock holder and member of the Board of Directors on Rheos Medicines; a stock holder and member of the Board of Directors for Provention Bio; and a stock holder and member of the Scientific Advisory Boards of Vir Therapeutics, Arcus Biotherapeutics, Quentis Therapeutics, Solid Biosciences and Celsius Therapeutics (Founder). J.A.B. owns stock in MacroGenics Inc., Vir Therapeutics, Arcus Biotherapeutics, Quentis Therapeutics, Solid Biosciences and Celsius Therapeutics. C.R. and L.T.V. declare no competing interests. J.A.B is the President and CEO of a newly formed biotech company targeting Treg therapy for the treatment of autoimmune and other immune disorders.

Additional information

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Immunology thanks M. Levings and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Glossary

Direct allospecificity

A process by which donor-derived antigen-presenting cells present allogeneic major histocompatibility complex–peptide complexes.

Indirect allospecificity

A process by which host-derived antigen-presenting cells present self-major histocompatibility complex–allogeneic peptide complexes.

Trogocytosis

A process whereby lymphocytes physically extract surface molecules from antigen-presenting cells.

Infectious tolerance

A phenomenon in which a tolerance-inducing state is transferred from one cell population to another.

Pauciclonal

The presentation of limited clonal variation.

Domain swap interface

The interface of a three-dimensional process by which two identical protein chains exchange part of their structure to form an intertwined dimer or higher-order oligomer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raffin, C., Vo, L.T. & Bluestone, J.A. Treg cell-based therapies: challenges and perspectives. Nat Rev Immunol (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-019-0232-6

Download citation