Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Germline risk of clonal haematopoiesis

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 17 June 2021

This article has been updated


Clonal haematopoiesis (CH) is a common, age-related expansion of blood cells with somatic mutations that is associated with an increased risk of haematological malignancies, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. CH may be caused by point mutations in genes associated with myeloid neoplasms, chromosomal copy number changes and loss of heterozygosity events. How inherited and environmental factors shape the incidence of CH is incompletely understood. Even though the several varieties of CH may have distinct phenotypic consequences, recent research points to an underlying genetic architecture that is highly overlapping. Moreover, there are numerous commonalities between the inherited variation associated with CH and that which has been linked to age-associated biomarkers and diseases. In this Review, we synthesize what is currently known about how inherited variation shapes the risk of CH and how this genetic architecture intersects with the biology of diseases that occur with ageing.


Haematopoiesis, the process by which blood cells are generated, begins in embryogenesis and continues throughout an individual’s lifespan1. Haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are responsible for the creation of all mature blood cells, including red blood cells, platelets, and the numerous myeloid cells (such as monocytes and neutrophils) and lymphoid cells (such as T cells and B cells), that comprise the innate and adaptive immune systems. Roughly 50,000–200,000 HSCs in an adult human2 produce an estimated 1010–1012 progeny blood cells every day3. Over the course of repeated cell divisions during a lifetime, HSCs accumulate unique patterns of acquired DNA mutations. Each HSC gains approximately one new exonic variant per decade4, although somatic changes can and do occur throughout the non-coding genome as well. Although the majority of these acquired mutations involves genetic loci that do not lead to phenotypic consequences, mutations can occur in portions of the genome that may confer a relative fitness advantage to affected HSCs. Such a fitness advantage can take several forms, including an increased proliferative drive, a more durable capacity for self-renewal that counteracts ageing-related drop-out from the HSC pool, or an improved ability to evade death from cellular damage5. Over time, the relative fitness advantage of these mutated HSCs can result in the clonal production of a large number of progeny that all bear the same somatic alterations.

This expansion of haematopoietic cells with the same acquired mutation is referred to as clonal haematopoiesis (CH). The first experimental evidence suggestive of widespread age-related clonality in the blood dates back to the mid-1990s6, but the genetic characterization of the acquired clonal mutations has only been possible over the past several years owing to three parallel developments. First, advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have enabled the identification of mutations with high resolution (that is, single base-pair changes) even when these lesions are present in just a fraction of sampled cells. Second, bioinformatic innovations in analyses of big data have allowed for the detection of mutations in meaningfully large datasets. Third, many simultaneous efforts to build institutional and national cohorts consisting of tens to hundreds of thousands of individuals have begun to come to fruition, providing ample substrate in which to look for acquired mutations as well as their associations with inherited variation and clinical phenotypes. The convergence of these trends has led to the identification of several distinct types of CH that are common and hold important implications for human health. Specifically, it is now known that CH is linked to a heightened risk of mortality and multiple common diseases of ageing, including blood cancers and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Moreover, this recent work has shown that germline variation influences the risk of developing CH and the type of acquired mutation that a clone will have.

In this Review, we aim to provide a complete synthesis of available research of how inherited genetic variation influences the incidence of CH. We detail the current evidence from twin studies and large-scale genetic association studies regarding the heritable risk of CH and consider how this genetic architecture intersects the biology of ageing.

Clonal haematopoiesis

Somatic variation giving rise to CH

Here, we use ‘CH’ as an umbrella term that refers to the presence of an expanded mutant clone of any sort within the blood, excluding the reactive expansion of immune cells within lymphoid organs and frank malignancy. CH is a common phenomenon among the general population and its prevalence increases significantly with age7,8,9,10,11. The blood is not unique in the accumulation of mutations with age, a trend which has also been observed in the solid organs12, although CH involves a distinct set of recurrently mutated genes and comes from a readily available tissue source. To date, the literature has largely classified CH by the type of somatic variation that can be observed within the clone: gain, loss and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) events involving a large portion of a chromosome or single-nucleotide variation and short insertions/deletions (indels).

By far the most common genetic lesion seen in CH is mosaic loss of the Y chromosome (mLOY) in men11,13,14,15,16. Additionally, mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs)9,17,18, single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels in genes associated with myeloid malignancies, and putative incidental mutations/genomic drift (CH with unknown drivers)8,10 have all been documented. In the absence of a haematological malignancy, these SNVs/indels are known as CH of indeterminate potential (CHIP) when the mutations are present at ≥2% variant allele fraction (VAF)7,8. This classification scheme is largely a by-product of how CH is identified in existing studies. Chromosomal abnormalities, including mLOY and mCAs, can be interrogated using genome-wide genotyping arrays (such as those used for genome-wide association studies (GWAS)), whereas whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data can identify SNVs or indels but is suboptimal for identifying mCA events.

Of these subtypes of CH, the vast majority of studies of inherited risk have examined mLOY, mCAs or CHIP; therefore, the remainder of this Review focuses on these three entities (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Types of clonal haematopoiesis.

Clonal haematopoiesis refers to a clonal expansion of blood cells that are often identified based on shared genetic mutations. a | An especially common type of clonal haematopoiesis is the mosaic loss of the Y chromosome (mLOY), an entity that is often studied separately from other large chromosomal events. b | When large segments of one or more chromosomes are gained, lost or recombine resulting in the loss of heterozygosity, this may result in clonal haematopoiesis with mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs). c | Clonal haematopoiesis may also occur through mutations in myeloid-associated genes, termed clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP).

Epidemiology of CH

All types of CH are strongly age associated. It has been postulated that all adults have some CH mutations at extremely low clonal fractions19,20 but prevalence estimates for CH in the population are typically based on the identification of clones with VAF of at least ~2%, which is approximately the limit of detection for many commonly used assays. An estimated 1.7–20% of men have some amount of mLOY11,13,14,15,16,21, with the prevalence increasing to >40% of individuals by age 70 in the largest epidemiological study to date11. The X chromosome seems to have a lower rate of mCA acquisition. Approximately 8% of women over the age of 65 years have detectable X chromosome mosaicism9, whereas men rarely have X chromosome mosaicism in the blood at any age22. Autosomal mCA events are the least commonly observed type of CH, affecting ~1–5% of the population older than 70 years of age9,17,23,24,25,26, whereas CHIP is estimated to affect >10% of individuals older than 70 years of age7,8,27. An individual can have both mCAs and CHIP simultaneously, which occurs frequently with point mutations in JAK2 (a tyrosine kinase involved in multiple cytokine signalling pathways28) and mCA events at the same locus17,29. However, aside from the JAK2 locus, the co-occurrence of CHIP and mCAs as identified by bulk sequencing/genotyping from the same individual appears to be a rare event18,27, although the prevalence is higher among patients treated for solid tumours30.

The prevalence of CH varies across several demographic features. There is a sex bias for specific mCA lesions, with most of these having greater prevalence in men17,26. Although some studies have suggested a male-bias for CHIP7, other studies have found this association does not persist after controlling for potential confounders27. Groups with different ancestries also have different prevalence. For instance, mLOY is less commonly observed in individuals of African ancestry than of European ancestry (0.4% versus 1.8%)15. Meanwhile, CHIP mutations are less frequently observed in individuals identifying as Hispanic7,27 or East Asian27.

There are substantial differences across age in the distribution of mutated CHIP genes27,31. In particular, mutations in the de novo DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A and in JAK2 can be observed with some regularity beginning in the third and fourth decade of life, whereas clones carrying mutations in spliceosome genes are generally detected no earlier than the fifth and sixth decades of life27,31. The extent to which this distribution is shaped by differences in DNA sequence mutability20, relative fitness advantage20 or interactions with an ageing microenvironment31 is still an area of active investigation.

Environmental exposures that increase somatic variant acquisition are significantly correlated with CH prevalence. In particular, smoking is robustly associated with CHIP8,27,32 and mLOY11,13,14,15,16,33,34. In the case of cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation therapy, the mutational spectrum exhibits a marked enrichment of mutations in DNA damage response pathway genes32,35,36. The outgrowth of CH clones following anticancer therapy is partly due to the expansion of pre-existing clones with a selective advantage35 but may also be from the introduction of new mutations by the anticancer agents themselves37 or due to stochastic effects from a bottleneck event for HSCs.

Health consequences of CH

Although most individuals with CH have normal haematological parameters, CH is associated with significant health consequences. With respect to larger chromosomal abnormalities, epidemiological studies have demonstrated associations between the mLOY and a broad range of health outcomes in men, including all-cause mortality15,21, numerous types of cancer11,14,21,33,38,39,40, cardiovascular events41, Alzheimer disease42, schizophrenia43, autoimmune disease44,45, diabetes15 and age-related macular degeneration46. Autosomal mCA events have been associated with an increased risk of haematological malignancies17,18,26,30 as well as with all-cause mortality only partially explained by excess cancer deaths9. Additionally, even as mCAs are independently associated with a heightened risk of myeloid malignancies, a retrospective analysis of patients with solid tumours found relatively increased rates of haematological malignancies in patients with both mCAs and CHIP compared to those with either alone30. Whether the presence of dual mCAs/CHIP is an indicator of individuals with particularly unstable genomes or whether the combination of these lesions cooperatively leads to malignancy risk remains to be determined. The heightened risk of infection and serious infectious complications may account for a portion of the excess mortality seen in patients with mCAs: a recent multinational study found that mCA events are moderately associated with risk for a wide range of infections (odds ratio (OR) = 1.06), including the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 (OR = 1.6)47. Somatic mutations in recurrently mutated CHIP genes have been studied in both natural epidemiological contexts and in experimental models, which have revealed strong associations with mortality, malignancy and CVD. All-cause mortality is greater in individuals with CHIP compared to without CHIP7,10; this is partly due to an increased risk of haematological malignancies, which has been observed across many studies7,8,10,48,49. However, individuals with CHIP mutations have excess mortality compared with those who do not harbour such mutations even after controlling for blood cancer deaths7,10. This may be partly explained by an association between CHIP and CVD. On a population level, CHIP has been linked to a greater burden of atherosclerotic vessel disease and a heightened risk of myocardial infarction50,51,52 as well as to higher blood levels of the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein53. Mouse models of CHIP have demonstrated mechanistic ties between certain common CHIP mutations and accelerated atherosclerosis50,54,55 as well as heart failure56,57.

Despite the fact that numerous genes affected by somatic CHIP mutations have been associated with increased cancer and CVD risk, there are early indications of important functional differences in how each mutant gene might contribute to that risk. For instance, mutations in splicing factor U2AF1 are associated with a higher risk of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and with a shorter latency to disease than mutations in DNMT3A48,58. Somatic mutations in TET2, encoding a dioxygenase that opposes the action of DNMT3A by promoting DNA demethylation58, and in JAK2 are associated with coronary artery disease50 but may differ in how they contribute to blood cell dysfunction. In mouse models, mutations in Tet2, whose gene product recruits HDAC2 for the resolution of IL-6-mediated inflammation59, are associated with increased expression of Il1b, Il6, Cxcl1, Cxcl2 and Cxcl3 (refs50,54). While mutations in Jak2 also lead to higher Il1b expression, they additionally lead to plaque-promoting erythrophagocytosis55, secretion of arterial spasm-inducing erythrocyte-derived microvesicles60 and thrombotic neutrophil extracellular traps61. Yet, much remains to be learned about the relative risk of disease outcomes with specific CHIP genes, let alone how disease risk might vary across different protein-altering variants within each gene. The curation of large CHIP cohorts with inherited genotype and deep phenotype data will enable further investigation of how germline variation affects CHIP-to-disease risk.

There is accumulating evidence that CHIP mutations may interact with human illnesses beyond cancer and CVD. Somatic CHIP mutations have been associated with several diseases in which inflammation features prominently, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease18,62, adult-onset haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis63 and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis64. CHIP also appears to be associated with several types of infections and with potentially severe disease manifestations among those infected with SARS-CoV-2 (ref.65), perhaps as a result of CHIP-exacerbated inflammatory signalling66. Several recent analyses have also found high rates of somatic mutations in CHIP genes in people with immunodeficiency from HIV, which might be a consequence of a pro-inflammatory disease state but might equally well be due to the impaired clearance of CH clones by T cells67,68. Furthermore, CHIP may have dynamic interactions with certain therapeutic interventions. Mutations in CHIP genes involved in the DNA damage response pathway, such as TP53 and PPM1D, are highly enriched following radiation treatment or treatment with a select few cytotoxic chemotherapies32,35,69,70,71,72. Additionally, CHIP has been associated with significantly increased mortality following transcatheter aortic valve implantation73, which is the first indication that CHIP might have an impact on surgical/procedural outcomes. Emerging research suggests that CHIP may impact patient outcomes following HSC transplantation (HSCT). Transplanted HSCs face several sizable and unique challenges, including the high replicative demand in order to reconstitute the entire population of blood cells as well as the exposure to immunosuppressive and cytotoxic therapies. The current evidence (nicely summarized in refs74,75) suggests that donor-derived CHIP is not uncommon in both allogeneic HSCT and autologous HSCT recipients and may increase risks of graft-versus-host disease, donor-derived leukaemia and overall mortality, although the interactions appear to be complex and may depend on both patient characteristics and the CHIP gene in question.

The disparate genomic lesions seen in CH and their associations with a broad range of consequential health outcomes has spurred research into how germline genetics influences the acquisition and outgrowth of specific somatic changes. In the next section, we discuss the associations between inherited variants and mLOY, mCAs and CHIP that have been described to date (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2: CH subtypes have shared and unique risk variants.

Many germline risk loci have been linked to the development of clonal haematopoiesis (CH). The three subtypes of CH that have received the greatest scrutiny in this area are mosaic loss of the Y chromosome (mLOY), mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs) and clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). These three subtypes are enriched for several of the same germline variants such as those affecting DNA damage response genes CHEK2 and ATM, proliferation factor TCL1A, and telomerase component TERT. However, each of these entities also retains risk loci unique to it alone. Considering the spectrum of variants, one notable pattern is a rarity of mitosis-specific genes in CHIP compared to their relative abundance in mLOY and mCAs. Another broad theme is the high prevalence of previously identified associations between these germline loci and diseases of ageing, including malignancies, cardiovascular disease and dementia. The degree to which CH is involved in these known links to disease remains to be determined. Note: over 150 loci have been associated with mLOY, only a small number of which are depicted in this figure.

Early evidence for inherited risk of CH

Although much of the knowledge about germline risk of CH has come from recent large-scale genetic association studies, some of the foundational insights in the field came from smaller studies relying on shared lineage to identify inherited risk factors. Starting even further back, research into inherited risk for haematological cancers provided signals that have informed the thinking around germline risk for CH, highlighting both the commonalities and differences between CH and malignancy.

Insights from haematological cancers

As CHIP mutations are also found in myeloid neoplasia, work on the genetic predispositions to haematological malignancies provided key initial insights linking the germline variation and expansion of somatic haematopoietic mutations. CHIP and myeloid malignancies such as myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and AML arise from similar origins in haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs)76,77,78. Despite the shared origins and patterns of acquired mutations, the vast majority of individuals with CHIP never develop a myeloid malignancy. Indeed, individuals with CHIP have normal counts of normal-appearing cells, whereas those with malignancy have abnormal numbers of blood cells and/or visibly dysmorphic cells. Given that CHIP is a potential precursor state to haematological cancer, many of the known germline risk factors for myeloid disease may also predispose to CHIP in a similar manner. Future study of the differences between the sets of germline variants predisposing more to CHIP versus the set predisposing more to malignancy may prove informative as to why only a minority of individuals ever progress from one to the other.

Many of the same germline variants predisposing to JAK2-mutated malignancies have also been associated with JAK2-CH79. JAK2 is the most commonly mutated gene in MPNs29 and the JAK2 p.Val617Phe mutation (JAK2V617F) is a characteristic feature of MPNs incorporated into the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for over a decade80,81. Consequently, some studies looking to define MPN germline risk have used cohorts formed exclusively of diagnosed myeloid disease/MPNs82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89, whereas other studies have augmented cohorts of diagnosed MPNs with the addition of any individuals with a molecularly detectable JAK2V617F mutation78,79 (which may include undiagnosed MPNs as well as JAK2V617F-CH).

The first inherited variation linked to JAK2V617F-mutated MPNs was the 46/1 or GGCC haplotype, a collection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) stretching across several hundred kilobases of DNA that includes the JAK2 gene itself82,83,84,85,86,87,88. In several studies of patients with MPNs, the JAK2V617F somatic variant was identified in cis with the inherited 46/1 risk haplotype more often than would be predicted by chance82,83,84, which might suggest that the haplotype provides a hypermutable substrate for somatic alterations. Furthermore, this haplotype may increase the rate of JAK2V617F clonal expansion. In a study of clonal dynamics preceding MPN diagnosis in 12 patients, the homozygosity for 46/1 was enriched in those patients with the highest average clonal growth rate90, an intriguing finding which should be followed up in larger cohorts. Inherited polymorphisms in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) locus have also been linked to all varieties of MPNs in several studies27,78,87,89 and to JAK2V617F-mutated disease in several others79,86,88. While most tissues in the human body lack the expression of TERT (a key enzyme in telomere maintenance), haematopoietic stem cells have the constitutive expression of this protein91,92. The precise mechanism of how telomere regulation might influence the expansion of JAK2V617F or other CH clones is just beginning to be understood (see Overlap with biomarkers of ageing, below).

Two dozen additional loci imparting potential risk of MPNs have recently been identified78,79,87. Similar to JAK2 (ref.93) and TERT94, many of these are genes implicated in the functional regulation of HSCs (including SH2B3 (ref.95), TET2 (ref.96), ATM97, GFI1B98 and RUNX1 (ref.99), among several others) although some of the loci with strong signals, such as PINT, have no known role in HSC biology. While the location of lead SNPs in or near key HSC regulators is strongly suggestive of mechanisms that disrupt normal HSC biology, variant-to-function analyses have provided added evidence in the case of GFI1B and CHEK2. In the first case, the lead SNP was located in a putative enhancer region downstream of GFI1B and was experimentally determined to lead to lower GFI1B expression, which, in turn, was shown to increase HSPC self-renewal78. The second case involves a rare missense variant in CHEK2 and similarly demonstrated increased HSPC self-renewal following the knockdown of gene expression78.

The genetic associations identified for JAK2-mutated malignancy and JAK2-CH are not completely overlapping. The examination of a JAK2V617F-CH cohort replicated associations with the 46/1 haplotype, TERT, SH2B3 and TET2 with nominally significant signals for CHEK2, ATM, PINT and GFI1B79; additionally, KPNA4 has been associated with a greater risk of all CHIP, inclusive of JAK2-CH27. The present lack of replication of other MPN-associated loci in CHIP cohorts leads to the question of whether and how inherited variation might shape the convergent somatic mutational landscapes yet differ in the magnitude or type of attendant phenotypic risk (Box 1).

Compared to the literature on JAK2, studies of haematological malignancies have been less revealing with respect to what germline factors may increase the risk of somatic mutation in other CHIP genes. Family-based studies of inherited risk of MDS and AML have noted a high prevalence of non-disease CHIP in carriers of rare inherited variants affecting RUNX1, a member of the core binding factor family of transcription factors and a key regulator of definitive haematopoiesis100,101. Aside from RUNX1, there are several other germline variants recognized to predispose to myeloid, lymphoid or plasma-cell neoplasms that could presumably also predispose to asymptomatic CHIP102. Genetic association studies of CHIP-only cohorts (that is, only individuals without haematological disease; discussed in detail in the ‘Results from genetic association studies’ section below) have seen a significant signal with just one of these genes: TERT27. Although the remainder are strong candidates for genes likely to predispose to CHIP, concrete evidence of this in asymptomatic individuals is currently lacking.

Evidence from sibling studies

Although no groups have conducted sibling studies of chromosomal mosaicism, several have looked at CHIP in siblings. The first study to examine the heritability of CH mutations using siblings looked only at the two most commonly mutated CHIP genes, DNMT3A and TET2 (ref.62). The authors looked at the risk-recurrence ratio (λs) for mutations within these genes among a set of 391 female sib-ships of French-Canadian ancestry and found no familial risk for DNMT3A mutations but a significantly increased risk for TET2s = 2.24 for those ≥55 years of age, λs = 2.65 for those ≥65 years of age)62. One sib-ship consisting of seven sisters was notable for having TET2 mutations in 4/7 and a DNMT3A mutation in 1/7 sisters, raising the provocative but unanswered question of whether germline genetics or common environmental exposures did more to shape such a pedigree62.

The heritability of CHIP has also been examined in twin pairs in two recently published studies103,104. One study consisted of 299 twin pairs from Denmark104, whereas the other was comprised of 79 twin pairs from the UK103. Neither study found a higher concordance for the incidence of CHIP among monozygotic (MZ) twins than among dizygotic pairs. The larger of the two studies additionally found no increased concordance among MZ pairs for CHIP mutations specifically in DNMT3A or TET2 (ref.104). Of note, these studies each identified sets of MZ twins that shared identical CH mutations (KDM6A p.Q692X and DNMT3A p.R598X in the UK cohort103 and SRSF2 p.P95H and c.912_916delCTGGT in DNMT3A in the Denmark cohort104), suggesting these mutations occurred in utero103; several subsequent studies of patients with MPNs have identified JAK2V617F and DNMT3A mutations that similarly arose during embryogenesis or childhood105,106. Taken together, these twin studies provide no evidence for common, strong germline effects on the development of CHIP in the populations studied. However, the moderate power afforded by the size of the study cohorts precludes the detection of more modest effects. Additional twin studies on diverse populations, with the potential for subsequent meta-analysis, could supplement the existing work in this area. Future twin studies would also be warranted for mLOY and mCAs, the present lack of which is a notable gap in the field.

Results from genetic association studies

The bulk of the data regarding the inherited risk for CH comes from genetic association studies. These studies identify the enrichment of genetic variants in people with CH across large, unrelated and (more-or-less) diverse samples. Such analyses are well suited to finding common germline variants with modest effects that are noticeable in the aggregate. The sheer size of newly usable national cohorts (on the scale of 100,000–500,000 individuals) has further enabled the detection of effects from rare inherited variants present in a tiny fraction of the overall population.

Mosaic loss of Y

A substantial fraction of risk for mLOY appears to be genetically determined, with estimates of mLOY heritability ranging from 9% to 34%11,13,107. The first germline association with mLOY to be uncovered was with a common SNP (rs2887399) near the 5′ end of TCL1A, which encodes the protein T cell leukaemia/lymphoma 1A (TCL1A)14. The TCL1A protein is a co-activator of AKT and it participates in B and T cell malignancies108, largely through chromosomal rearrangements that place TCL1A near TCR-A (the gene for the T cell antigen receptor)109. This strong association between rs2887399 and mLOY has been replicated in subsequent studies with larger cohorts11,13; notably, single-cell RNA-sequencing of B lymphocytes has demonstrated that TCL1A gene expression is significantly higher in the setting of mLOY, suggesting that such clonal outgrowth in mLOY could be partly driven by supra-normal TCL1A expression11. GWAS projects have found over 150 additional loci significantly associated with mLOY, many of which functionally regulate various aspects of the cell cycle, including the formation of mitotic structures (for example, SPDL1, CENPU and CENPN, MAD1L1 and MAD2L1, and PMF1), the replication and stability of DNA (for example, ATM and NPAT), and cell arrest and apoptosis (for example, TP53, BCL2 and BAX)11,13,107. The implicated genes highlight three complementary processes influencing mLOY: increasing rates of functional mistakes during mitosis, a lack of ability to detect such DNA abnormalities and escape from normal apoptotic regulation in the face of recognized DNA damage.

Autosomal and X chromosome variation

As with mLOY, autosomal and X chromosome mCAs are associated with germline variants that increase risk of mutagenesis. Unlike mLOY, which only involves the unpaired Y chromosome, these mCAs may also be associated with variants that provide a strong selection pressure towards CN-LOH events9,17. Studies conducted in population-scale biobanks in the UK (UK Biobank (UKB))9,17,110 and Japan (BioBank Japan (BBJ))26,111 have demonstrated significant germline associations with mCAs. These associations occur both in cis and in trans with the inherited variant. In both populations, the trans associations involve common alleles with modest odds ratios. Variants in TERT and the related TERC (encoding telomerase RNA component91) as well as variants in SP140 (encoding a lymphoid-restricted nuclear body protein involved in B cell antigen response112) are associated with mCAs occurring anywhere in the genome17, whereas the remaining inherited variants have only been associated with trans mCAs on a particular chromosome9,17,26 (Table 1). Apart from common variation in TCL1A and DLK1 (a negative regulator of HSPC differentiation113) that is linked to 14q CN-LOH17 and a known association between the JAK2 46/1 haplotype and 9p CN-LOH9,17,82,83,84,114, the identified cis mCA associations are predominantly rare variants. Many of these rare germline variants are missense or nonsense mutations predicted to damage protein function. The cis mCA lesions associated with these disruptive variants demonstrate a strong preferential CN-LOH duplication of either the risk or the non-risk allele. In ATM, NBN and MRE11, all of which are genes involved in maintaining genomic integrity, it is their damaged germline allele that is more commonly propagated9,17. Conversely, the presence of damaging germline variants in the MPL gene, which encodes the thrombopoietin receptor important for HSC self-renewal, are associated with the duplication of the non-damaged allele9,17. Preferential CN-LOH duplication arising from germline alleles that confer a relative fitness advantage may also extend to polygenic risk. When the group studying the UKB cohort constructed blood cell-proliferation polygenic risk scores consisting of signals within individual chromosomal arms, they found that these are often associated with CN-LOH events on the same arm17. This finding raises the possibility that a main driver of these common CN-LOH somatic events is the replacement of inherited DNA segments with homologous segments that impart a greater fitness advantage17.

Table 1 Cis-acting and trans-acting risk variants for mCAs

The specific inherited variants associated with mCAs and the spectrum of mCAs themselves may differ significantly across populations. Several of the rare variants associated with cis mCAs in the UKB cohort (ATM, MPL, FRA10B and TM2D3–TARSL2) were absent in the BBJ cohort, whereas variants in several other genes (MRE11, NBN, NEDD8–TINF2 and CTU2) were present at higher frequencies26. These population-specific differences may shape not only the relative frequencies of observed mCAs but also patterns of downstream disease. For example, the incidences of chromosome 12 gain, 13q loss and 13q CN-LOH are between twofold to sixfold less in the BBJ cohort26; these mCAs are often seen in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia115,116, a malignancy that is four to five times more common among Europeans than among Japanese individuals117. Collectively, these studies highlight the importance of including diverse populations in genomics research118.

Small variants: SNPs and indels

Several recent large genomic studies have focused on CH identified with WGS data, using short-read sequencing to simultaneously identify germline and somatic SNPs and indels10,18,27. Mirroring one of the main signals found with JAK2, one study using the deCODE cohort from Iceland found that variation in the TERT locus (lead SNP rs34002450) was associated with CH (OR = 1.37, minor allele frequency (MAF) = 0.41) as defined by an outlier status on WGS10. Meanwhile, in the same study, individuals with CH were found to have a shorter average telomere length than individuals without CH10. An analysis of the NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed)119 cohort in the USA recapitulated the association between rs34002450 and CHIP (OR = 1.3), although this study identified a different lead SNP (rs7705526; MAF = 0.29; r2 = 0.55 with rs34002450) as well as a second SNP in TERT that was independently associated with CHIP (rs13167280; OR = 1.3; MAF = 0.11; r2 = 0.2 with rs7705526)27. Additionally, an analysis of the UKB similarly identified associations with CHIP for an SNP in linkage disequilibrium with rs34002450 (rs7726159; OR = 1.33; MAF = 0.33; r2 = 0.70 with rs34002450) and for a second independent SNP in TERT (rs2853677; OR = 1.32; MAF = 0.42)18. Within the TOPMed cohort, two additional SNPs achieved genome-wide significant associations with CHIP. One variant (rs1210060191) is quite common (risk allele frequency = 0.54) and lies in the intronic region of TRIM59 but has a relatively weaker association with CHIP (OR = 1.16) than the TERT SNPs27. The second is a variant in an intergenic region near TET2 (rs144418061), which is specific to individuals with African ancestry (MAF = 0.035 in African ancestry, not present in samples without African ancestry), that is strongly associated with CHIP (OR = 2.4)27. A subsequent variant-to-function analysis of this second locus revealed a variant (rs79901204) that is predicted to disrupt a GATA/E-box in an enhancer element. The risk allele for this variant indeed reduced luciferase activation fourfold in an in vitro experiment and had a dose-dependent association with decreased TET2 gene expression in whole-blood samples from patients. Thus, it appears this variant increases the self-renewal and proliferation capacity of haematopoietic stem cells via reduced TET2 expression, which might create a selective pressure for CHIP clone expansion in one of several ways27. Increased rates of cell division may increase DNA replication strain and increase the likelihood of acquiring a lesion in a CHIP gene in the first place and/or the germline TET2 SNP might have a synergistic cooperativity with any subsequent incidental CHIP mutations to increase the relative fitness of the HSC.

The TOPMed study was also powered to investigate germline associations specifically in DNMT3A-CH and TET2-CH. Although there were no significant associations with TET2, there was a significant association for DNMT3A with variant rs2887399 (OR = 1.23; MAF = 0.23)27. Of note, this is the same variant near TCL1A that is associated with mLOY11,14. Each of these germline SNPs associated with CHIP are noted in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3: CHIP has polygenic risk.

Genetic association studies have demonstrated that the inherited risk landscape for clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is characterized by numerous common variants with modest effect sizes and several rare variants associated with strong effects. Associations with the TERT locus have been replicated among numerous studies of individuals with CHIP as well as clonal haematopoiesis (CH) identified by high somatic mutational burden in whole-genome sequencing (WGS-outlier). Furthermore, CH by WGS-outlier is strongly correlated with CHIP and mosaic loss of the Y chromosome, highlighting a robust association between telomere biology and CHIP. Where studies have examined single genes affected by a somatic CHIP mutation, the results point to heterogeneity in their germline associations, both in terms of associated variants (for example, germline TCL1A variation is associated with DNMT3A-CH but not JAK2-CH) and the degree of association (for example, a stronger association of germline TERT variants with JAK2-CH than with CH overall).

Overlap with processes of ageing

Inherited and somatic variation at many CH risk loci have also been linked to diseases and processes of ageing (Table 2). Here, we specifically focus on the overlap of CH germline risk loci with germline variants associated with malignancy, CVD and several biomarkers of ageing. We also consider the challenges in distinguishing whether such overlap is independent or partially mediated by the presence of CH itself.

Table 2 Select germline risk loci associated with CH and diseases of ageing

Overlap with malignancy

In addition to the associations with MPNs described above, many of the inherited risk variants for CH also predispose to haematological and non-haematological cancers. This is particularly true of the genes involved in the DNA damage response: CHEK2, TP53, NBN, MRE11 and ATM. Inherited putative loss-of-function variants in CHEK2 (refs120,121,122,123,124) and TP53 (refs125,126,127) have long been known to be a cause of autosomal dominant familial cancer syndromes, while mutations in NBN (causing the autosomal recessive Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome)128,129 and MRE11 (refs130,131) confer an increased susceptibility to the development of a malignancy. Similarly, mutations in ATM, the aetiological agent of the autosomal recessive ataxia telangiectasia syndrome132, are associated with an increased risk of numerous types of cancer, including leukaemia and lymphoma133,134, breast cancer135,136, and prostate cancer137,138, among many others. Germline mutations in NPAT (nuclear protein, ataxia telangiectasia locus), whose gene product has been implicated in the transcriptional regulation of histone genes as well as ATM139, has been reported as a risk factor for Hodgkin lymphoma140. The most plausible mechanism of action for the contribution of these inherited variants is similar to their role in cancer — establishing a cellular context that is permissive of DNA mutation — rather than the direct effects on clonal proliferation. By contrast, other inherited variants may directly influence proliferation or augment the rapidity of proliferation by later CH mutations. Mutation or experimental deletion of TET2, which is often mutated in familial myeloid and lymphoid malignancies141,142,143, leads to increased HSC proliferation96 and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines50,54,56,66. Lastly, variants in SH2B3, a negative regulator of the pro-proliferative JAK–STAT signalling pathway in haematopoietic cells144, are associated with malignancies145, including in the blood144, breast78,146, lung146 and colon78,146.

Overlap with CVD

CVD is a major source of morbidity in ageing. Early epidemiological and functional studies of CHIP identified strong links between CHIP mutations and CVD50,51,54,56,147, raising the question of whether these entities exhibit shared germline predispositions. In addition to the risk of a haematological malignancy, germline TET2 mutations have also been associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension, which is a lethal vasculopathy148. In contrast to the role of this epigenetic regulator in tumorigenesis, which is thought to rest on increased HSPC self-renewal96,149,150,151, lineage skewing96,149,150,151 and an increased tendency towards mutation152, the contribution of mutant TET2 to pulmonary arterial hypertension may stem from overproduction of inflammatory cytokines (for example, IL-1β) in differentiated immune cells148. Meanwhile, genetic variation in the gene SH2B3 has been linked to numerous aspects of cardiovascular dysfunction, including hypertension153,154, aortic dissection155, atherosclerosis156 and stroke157. However, for at least one well-studied variant, there appears to be a trade-off between CVD risk and cancer risk: the C allele of rs3184504, which encodes SH2B3 p.R262W, is associated with a reduced risk of CVD (OR = 0.95) but a heightened risk of cancer (OR = 1.03). If such risk trade-offs persist more generally for SH2B3, this could limit the utility of targeting the gene itself for disease prevention, although future work may find distinct downstream effectors that could be targeted to limit either CVD risk or cancer risk.

Overlap with biomarkers of ageing

The links between telomere biology and CH are robust but complicated. Across tissues, telomere length is inversely correlated with ageing158. Inherited genetic variation influences telomere length, which is also tightly linked to the somatic expression of telomerase genes158. The risk variants associated with CH have substantial overlap with multiple portions of the cellular machinery responsible for telomere maintenance: TERT has been implicated in the risk for all CH subtypes, while TERC and TINF2 (encoding the TIN2 protein, part of the shelterin complex159) are associated with mCAs. However, even though CH is strongly associated with ageing, the germline variation in telomere genes that predisposes to CH tends to associate with longer telomeres not shorter. The TERT intron 2 SNPs rs7705526 (ref.160) (the lead variant for increased risk for CHIP27 and global mCA events17) and rs2853677 (ref.161) (associated with 14q CN-LOH26) associate with longer telomeres and greater telomere length, as predicted by germline variation, is positively associated with mCA events162. Recent work using Mendelian randomization has suggested that the telomere–CH relationship is actually bidirectional: longer telomeres may partly cause CHIP (perhaps through an increased propensity for mutation) whereas CHIP, once acquired, may contribute to telomere shortening (possibly via increased rates of cell cycling)163. Importantly, genetic association studies of telomere maintenance genes have revealed links to a broad spectrum of diseases, including strong ties to cancer164 and CVD165,166,167,168. Future work investigating links between telomere length and these diseases (or CH and these diseases) may need to account for mediating effects through the telomere–CH axis.

DNA methylation at CpG sites is a promising biomarker that has been used to generate highly accurate estimates of chronological age, such as with the Horvath epigenetic clock169. Many diseases that disproportionately affect the elderly, such as cancer and dementia, are linked to accelerated epigenetic ageing, in which an individual’s DNA methylation profile suggests an older chronological age than is true169. Likewise, individuals with CHIP (also an age-associated feature) have epigenetic age acceleration in blood cells170. The rate of epigenetic ageing has a heritable component169, including variation at loci associated with CH risk: TERT, TET2, TRIM59 and KPNA4 (ref.171). Paradoxically, faster epigenetic ageing is linked to TERT variants associated with longer telomeres172, matching the directionality of the CH risk variants at this locus. It is also worth noting that several of the genes that are most often affected by somatic CHIP mutations are epigenetic regulators whose (impaired) performance could plausibly shape an individual’s rate of epigenetic ageing. The top CHIP genes DNMT3A and TET2 directly modulate CpG methylation and dictate global methylation patterns within HSPCs173. Less common CHIP mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 lead to the production of the metabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate, which interferes with the function of TET2 (ref.174). Additionally, interestingly, many of the CpG sites used in the Horvath epigenetic clock are near target genes of Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2)169, a protein complex whose function is impaired by CHIP mutations in ASXL1 (ref.174). Yet, the extent to which CHIP, or CH more broadly, might cause alterations in epigenetic ageing remains to be determined.

Determining causality: MR approaches

As described above, CH is associated with many diseases of ageing, which naturally begets the question: does CH contribute to these phenotypes? Although potential CH–phenotype relationships will be studied by conducting future natural or laboratory experiments like those that have demonstrated ties between CH and haematological malignancies or heart disease, there is a wealth of already generated genetic and phenotypic data that may provide insights on a shorter horizon. Mendelian randomization (MR) is a statistical technique that utilizes inherited variation to test causation between an exposure (here, CH) and outcome (disease of interest)175. MR relies on a quasi-experimental setup in which individuals have a higher or lower probability of experiencing the exposure based on the alleles they were randomly assigned at birth. Using this random germline-determined variation in exposure allows for the estimation of a causal relationship between the exposure and outcome (Fig. 4a). MR analysis has already been used to demonstrate that a higher risk of prostate, testicular, breast, glioma cell and renal cell cancers is predicted by the inherited risk for mLOY11. However, attempts to characterize the contribution of CH to diseases of ageing via MR approaches are likely to face several hurdles. The first is that, as described here, many germline variants associated with CH have also been previously associated with the diseases of ageing, leading to issues of horizontal pleiotropy that confound the estimation of a causal effect by MR176 (Fig. 4b). The risk of this can be minimized but not eliminated by only using variants with no described relation to the disease being studied. A second challenge is that data on CH is obtained through the sequencing of blood cells, which is rarely done in routine clinical practice and, when performed for research studies, is often done only once. As a result, data on CH is often a cross-sectional snapshot lacking information on the evolution and temporal duration of a clone. This will present difficulties for effect size estimation but may be ameliorated by future longitudinal studies and as sequencing costs drop and this test becomes more widely deployed in clinical settings. These potential methodological challenges aside, we anticipate that, with the increased power derived from larger CH GWAS sample sizes, MR will become an increasingly useful tool in answering questions about the health consequences of CH.

Fig. 4: Using germline variation to study causal associations of CH.

Certain situations in which germline variants affect the risk of developing clonal haematopoiesis (CH) can be used to determine whether CH has a causal contribution to a given phenotype. A Mendelian randomization (MR) approach takes advantage of the fact that individuals acquire their germline allelic composition by chance. Any change in CH frequency or clone size due to germline variation can then be treated as the result of a random genetic assignment and used to estimate a causal association between CH and the phenotype. Current evidence suggests that some germline variants may affect CH but do not independently influence the associated phenotypes — such variants are the most likely to be appropriate for MR analyses. For example, TCL1A is known to increase the risk of DNMT3A-CH but is not known to have direct effects on cardiovascular disease (CVD) (part a). However, there is substantial overlap in the genetic architecture of CH and diseases of ageing, so some inherited variants may affect both CH and observed phenotypes. In such cases, MR estimates of causality are confounded by the direct association of the germline variant with the outcome. A good example of this is germline variation in SH2B3, which is associated with both the risk of JAK2-CH and CVD (part b). Unless this latter association can be properly accounted for, a typical MR approach would overestimate the effect of JAK2 on CVD.

Conclusions and perspectives

How germline genetics contributes to CH risk is an emerging field with a rapidly growing body of work. By simultaneously analysing germline and somatic genetic variation on a population scale, research in this area in just the past 5 years has made dramatic contributions to our understanding of HSC biology and disease risk.

To date, the patterns of germline susceptibility to mLOY, mCAs and CHIP have largely been studied in isolation from one another. However, the comparison of the inherited risk landscape for each of these phenomena reveals that these entities share many genetic signals (Fig. 2). In particular, the DNA damage response and telomere maintenance pathway genes are commonly implicated in genetic association studies with these CH subtypes. The substantial overlap in germline risk suggests that there may be common mechanisms that predispose individuals to mLOY, mCAs and CHIP. Therefore, there is likely to be a benefit to studying these phenomena jointly. Additionally, the existence of shared risk loci raises the important question of what additional factors may influence the likelihood that an HSC will acquire one type of CH over another (Box 2). It also remains to be fully explored whether and to what degree inherited variants contribute to the co-occurrence (or co-interaction, if one somatic change influences the next) of acquired CH mutations of different varieties, especially CHIP mutations and focal deletions or loss-of-heterozygosity events. These questions are important for our understanding of how HSCs adapt to the stresses of ageing and to improve our ability to assess the risk of disease for individuals carrying predisposing germline variants.

Moving forward, we expect studies in this field to focus not just on how inherited variation influences the risk of somatic mutations but also on how inherited variation interacts with these acquired mutations to influence disease phenotypes and biological ageing. For example, although CHIP mutations are associated with an increased risk of leukaemia and myocardial infarction, these outcomes are observed only in a minority of CHIP carriers7,8,50,51. Recent work has identified an inherited polymorphism in the IL-6 receptor that reduces the likelihood of heart disease in individuals with CHIP51; however, the full extent to which germline factors mitigate or contribute to disease manifestations in individuals with CHIP is still to be explored.

As we understand more about how inherited germline genetic variation interacts with CH, there will be increasing motivation to develop and deploy precision medicine applications that incorporate knowledge of the germline genome to precisely estimate the risk for CH and for developing associated disease sequelae. Given that most individuals with CH do not display overt symptoms of the condition, in time, these approaches may enable more precise CH screening regimens. In the more immediate future, the recent creation of specialty CH clinics177, well suited to capturing CH carriers in populations whose at-risk status warrants more extensive screenings (such as cancer patients), may afford opportunities for the rapid translation of new research insights in this space into impactful patient care.

Change history


  1. 1.

    Orkin, S. H. & Zon, L. I. Hematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell 132, 631–644 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lee-Six, H. et al. Population dynamics of normal human blood inferred from somatic mutations. Nature 561, 473–478 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Beerman, I. et al. Functionally distinct hematopoietic stem cells modulate hematopoietic lineage potential during aging by a mechanism of clonal expansion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5465–5470 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Welch, J. S. et al. The origin and evolution of mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell 150, 264–278 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jan, M., Ebert, B. L. & Jaiswal, S. Clonal hematopoiesis. Semin. Hematol. 54, 43–50 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Busque, L. et al. Nonrandom X-inactivation patterns in normal females: lyonization ratios vary with age. Blood 88, 59–65 (1996). This paper, showing age-associated chromosome X inactivation skew, provided the initial evidence that was suggestive of clonality in the blood of individuals without haematological disease.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jaiswal, S. et al. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 2488–2498 (2014). This work was the first to find associations between non-cancer mortality and CHIP.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Genovese, G. et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and blood-cancer risk inferred from blood DNA sequence. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 2477–2487 (2014). This study delineated CH from unknown drivers and the strong association between CHIP and leukaemia.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Loh, P.-R. et al. Insights into clonal haematopoiesis from 8,342 mosaic chromosomal alterations. Nature 559, 350–355 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zink, F. et al. Clonal hematopoiesis, with and without candidate driver mutations, is common in the elderly. Blood 130, 742–752 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Thompson, D. J. et al. Genetic predisposition to mosaic Y chromosome loss in blood. Nature 575, 652–657 (2019). This study on the genetic determinants of mLOY is the largest to date and used multiple modalities to validate associations.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kakiuchi, N. & Ogawa, S. Clonal expansion in non-cancer tissues. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 239–256 (2021). This recent review presents the current knowledge regarding clonality throughout the human body and is a good entry point for those seeking to learn more about the field.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wright, D. J. et al. Genetic variants associated with mosaic Y chromosome loss highlight cell cycle genes and overlap with cancer susceptibility. Nat. Genet. 49, 674–679 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhou, W. et al. Mosaic loss of chromosome Y is associated with common variation near TCL1A. Nat. Genet. 48, 563–568 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Loftfield, E. et al. Predictors of mosaic chromosome Y loss and associations with mortality in the UK Biobank. Sci. Rep. 8, 12316 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dumanski, J. P. et al. Smoking is associated with mosaic loss of chromosome Y. Science 347, 81–83 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Loh, P.-R., Genovese, G. & McCarroll, S. A. Monogenic and polygenic inheritance become instruments for clonal selection. Nature 584, 136–141 (2020). This large study of mCA genetics found that both monogenic and polygenic risk variants can predict mCA events.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dawoud, A. A. Z., Tapper, W. J. & Cross, N. C. P. Clonal myelopoiesis in the UK Biobank cohort: ASXL1 mutations are strongly associated with smoking. Leukemia 34, 2660–2672 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Young, A. L., Challen, G. A., Birmann, B. M. & Druley, T. E. Clonal haematopoiesis harbouring AML-associated mutations is ubiquitous in healthy adults. Nat. Commun. 7, 12484 (2016). This paper measuring somatic mutations down to very low allele burden found acquired variants in the blood of 95% (19/20) of sampled adults.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Watson, C. J. et al. The evolutionary dynamics and fitness landscape of clonal hematopoiesis. Science 367, 1449–1454 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Forsberg, L. A. et al. Mosaic loss of chromosome Y in peripheral blood is associated with shorter survival and higher risk of cancer. Nat. Genet. 46, 624–628 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhou, W. et al. Detectable chromosome X mosaicism in males is rarely tolerated in peripheral leukocytes. Sci. Rep. 11, 1193 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jacobs, K. B. et al. Detectable clonal mosaicism and its relationship to aging and cancer. Nat. Genet. 44, 651–658 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Machiela, M. J. et al. Characterization of large structural genetic mosaicism in human autosomes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 96, 487–497 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Laurie, C. C. et al. Detectable clonal mosaicism from birth to old age and its relationship to cancer. Nat. Genet. 44, 642–650 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Terao, C. et al. Chromosomal alterations among age-related haematopoietic clones in Japan. Nature 584, 130–135 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bick, A. G. et al. Inherited causes of clonal haematopoiesis in 97,691 whole genomes. Nature 586, 763–768 (2020). This study is the largest GWAS of CHIP done to date.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Perner, F., Perner, C., Ernst, T. & Heidel, H. F. Roles of JAK2 in aging, inflammation, hematopoiesis and malignant transformation. Cells 8, 854 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kralovics, R. et al. A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 1779–1790 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gao, T. et al. Interplay between chromosomal alterations and gene mutations shapes the evolutionary trajectory of clonal hematopoiesis. Nat. Commun. 12, 338 (2021). This study was the first to examine the combined effect of CHIP and mCAs on patient outcomes, finding increased mortality in individuals with both types of lesions.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    McKerrell, T. et al. Leukemia-associated somatic mutations drive distinct patterns of age-related clonal hemopoiesis. Cell Rep. 10, 1239–1245 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Coombs, C. C. et al. Therapy-related clonal hematopoiesis in patients with non-hematologic cancers is common and associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Cell Stem Cell 21, 374–382.e4 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Loftfield, E. et al. Mosaic Y loss is moderately associated with solid tumor risk. Cancer Res. 79, 461 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lin, S.-H. et al. Mosaic chromosome Y loss is associated with alterations in blood cell counts in UK Biobank men. Sci. Rep. 10, 3655 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bolton, K. L. et al. Cancer therapy shapes the fitness landscape of clonal hematopoiesis. Nat. Genet. 52, 1219–1226 (2020). This paper offers a detailed look at how radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted agents and immune therapies are associated with CHIP.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Boucai, L. et al. Radioactive iodine-related clonal hematopoiesis in thyroid cancer is common and associated with decreased survival. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 103, 4216–4223 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Pich, O. et al. The evolution of hematopoietic cells under cancer therapy. bioRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ganster, C. et al. New data shed light on Y-loss-related pathogenesis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 54, 717–724 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Noveski, P. et al. Loss of Y chromosome in peripheral blood of colorectal and prostate cancer patients. PLoS ONE 11, e0146264 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Machiela, M. J. et al. Mosaic chromosome Y loss and testicular germ cell tumor risk. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 637–640 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Haitjema, S. et al. Loss of Y chromosome in blood is associated with major cardiovascular events during follow-up in men after carotid endarterectomy. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 10, e001544 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Dumanski, J. P. et al. Mosaic loss of chromosome Y in blood is associated with Alzheimer disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 98, 1208–1219 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hirata, T. et al. Investigation of chromosome Y loss in men with schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 14, 2115–2122 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Persani, L. et al. Increased loss of the Y chromosome in peripheral blood cells in male patients with autoimmune thyroiditis. J. Autoimmun. 38, J193–J196 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lleo, A. et al. Y chromosome loss in male patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. J. Autoimmun. 41, 87–91 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Grassmann, F. et al. Y chromosome mosaicism is associated with age-related macular degeneration. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 27, 36–41 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Zekavat, S. M. et al. Hematopoietic mosaic chromosomal alterations and risk for infection among 767,891 individuals without blood cancer. medRxiv (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Abelson, S. et al. Prediction of acute myeloid leukaemia risk in healthy individuals. Nature 559, 400–404 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Desai, P. et al. Somatic mutations precede acute myeloid leukemia years before diagnosis. Nat. Med. 24, 1015–1023 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Jaiswal, S. et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 337, 111–121 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bick, A. G. et al. Genetic interleukin 6 signaling deficiency attenuates cardiovascular risk in clonal hematopoiesis. Circulation 141, 124–131 (2020). This paper was the first to examine how inherited germline variation can alter the clinical consequences of CHIP, finding lower rates of cardiovascular events in individuals with CHIP and a germline polymorphism attenuating IL-6 receptor signalling compared to those without the polymorphism.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Honigberg, M. C. et al. Premature menopause, clonal hematopoiesis, and coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women. Circulation 143, 410–423 (2021).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Busque, L. et al. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein is associated with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Blood Adv. 4, 2430–2438 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Fuster, J. J. et al. Clonal hematopoiesis associated with TET2 deficiency accelerates atherosclerosis development in mice. Science 355, 842–847 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wang, W. et al. Macrophage inflammation, erythrophagocytosis and accelerated atherosclerosis in Jak2V617F Mice. Circ. Res. 11, e35–e47 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sano, S. et al. Tet2-mediated clonal hematopoiesis accelerates heart failure through a mechanism involving the IL-1β/NLRP3 inflammasome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 71, 875–886 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sano, S. et al. JAK2V617F-mediated clonal hematopoiesis accelerates pathological remodeling in murine heart failure. JACC 4, 684–697 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lyko, F. The DNA methyltransferase family: a versatile toolkit for epigenetic regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 81–92 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Zhang, Q. et al. Tet2 is required to resolve inflammation by recruiting Hdac2 to specifically repress IL-6. Nature 525, 389–393 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Poisson, J. et al. Erythrocyte-derived microvesicles induce arterial spasms in JAK2V617F myeloproliferative neoplasm. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 2630–2643 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Wolach, O. et al. Increased neutrophil extracellular trap formation promotes thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaan8292 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Buscarlet, M. et al. DNMT3A and TET2 dominate clonal hematopoiesis and demonstrate benign phenotypes and different genetic predispositions. Blood 130, 753–762 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Miller, P. et al. Contribution of clonal hematopoiesis to adult-onset hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Blood 136, 3051–3055 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Arends, C. M. et al. Clonal hematopoiesis in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Haematologica 105, e264–e267 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Bolton, K. L. et al. Clonal hematopoiesis is associated with risk of severe Covid-19. medRxiv (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Abplanalp, W. T. et al. Association of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential with inflammatory gene expression in patients with severe degenerative aortic valve stenosis or chronic postischemic heart failure. JAMA Cardiol. 5, 1170–1175 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Bick, A. G. et al. Increased CHIP Prevalence Amongst People Living with HIV. medRxiv (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Dharan, N. J. et al. Age-related clonal haematopoiesis is more prevalent in older adults with HIV: the ARCHIVE study. medRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Takahashi, K. et al. Preleukaemic clonal haemopoiesis and risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms: a case-control study. Lancet Oncol. 18, 100–111 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Lindsley, R. C. et al. Prognostic mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome after stem-cell transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 536–547 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Kahn, J. D. et al. PPM1D truncating mutations confer resistance to chemotherapy and sensitivity to PPM1D inhibition in hematopoietic cells. Blood 132, 1095–1105 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Hsu, J. I. et al. PPM1D mutations drive clonal hematopoiesis in response to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Cell Stem Cell 23, 700–713.e706 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Mas-Peiro, S. et al. Clonal haematopoiesis in patients with degenerative aortic valve stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur. Heart J. 41, 933–939 (2019).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Nawas, M. T. et al. The clinical implications of clonal hematopoiesis in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood Rev. 46, 100744 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Wilk, C. M., Manz, M. G. & Boettcher, S. Clonal hematopoiesis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 28, 94–100 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Steensma, D. P. et al. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and its distinction from myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 126, 9–16 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Sperling, A. S., Gibson, C. J. & Ebert, B. L. The genetics of myelodysplastic syndrome: from clonal haematopoiesis to secondary leukaemia. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 5–19 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Bao, E. L. et al. Inherited myeloproliferative neoplasm risk affects haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 586, 769–775 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Hinds, D. A. et al. Germ line variants predispose to both JAK2 V617F clonal hematopoiesis and myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 128, 1121–1128 (2016). This large study of individuals with JAK2 mutations found several strong germline associations.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Vardiman, J. W. et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood 114, 937 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Arber, D. A. et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 127, 2391–2405 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Jones, A. V. et al. JAK2 haplotype is a major risk factor for the development of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Nat. Genet. 41, 446–449 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Kilpivaara, O. et al. A germline JAK2 SNP is associated with predisposition to the development of JAK2V617F-positive myeloproliferative neoplasms. Nat. Genet. 41, 455–459 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Olcaydu, D. et al. A common JAK2 haplotype confers susceptibility to myeloproliferative neoplasms. Nat. Genet. 41, 450–454 (2009). Jones et al.82, Kilpivaara et al.83 and Olcaydu et al.84 identified variation in the 46/1 haplotype as linked to MPNs.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Trifa, A. P. et al. The G allele of the JAK2 rs10974944 SNP, part of JAK2 46/1 haplotype, is strongly associated with JAK2 V617F-positive myeloproliferative neoplasms. Ann. Hematol. 89, 979–983 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Trifa, A. P. et al. TERT rs2736100 A>C SNP and JAK2 46/1 haplotype significantly contribute to the occurrence of JAK2 V617F and CALR mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms – a multicentric study on 529 patients. Br. J. Haematol. 174, 218–226 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Trifa, A. P. et al. MECOM, HBS1L-MYB, THRB-RARB, JAK2, and TERT polymorphisms defining the genetic predisposition to myeloproliferative neoplasms: a study on 939 patients. Am. J. Hematol. 93, 100–106 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Tapper, W. et al. Genetic variation at MECOM, TERT, JAK2 and HBS1L-MYB predisposes to myeloproliferative neoplasms. Nat. Commun. 6, 6691 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Oddsson, A. et al. The germline sequence variant rs2736100_C in TERT associates with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leukemia 28, 1371–1374 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    McKerrell, T. et al. JAK2 V617F hematopoietic clones are present several years prior to MPN diagnosis and follow different expansion kinetics. Blood Adv. 1, 968–971 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Shay, J. W. & Wright, W. E. Telomeres and telomerase: three decades of progress. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 299–309 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Zimmermann, S. & Martens, U. M. Telomeres, senescence, and hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Tissue Res. 331, 79–90 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Akada, H. et al. Critical role of Jak2 in the maintenance and function of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cells 32, 1878–1889 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Allsopp, R. C., Morin, G. B., DePinho, R., Harley, C. B. & Weissman, I. L. Telomerase is required to slow telomere shortening and extend replicative lifespan of HSCs during serial transplantation. Blood 102, 517–520 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Gery, S. & Koeffler, H. P. Role of the adaptor protein LNK in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Oncogene 32, 3111–3118 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Moran-Crusio, K. et al. Tet2 loss leads to increased hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and myeloid transformation. Cancer Cell 20, 11–24 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Ito, K. et al. Regulation of oxidative stress by ATM is required for self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 431, 997–1002 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    van der Meer, L. T., Jansen, J. H. & van der Reijden, B. A. Gfi1 and Gfi1b: key regulators of hematopoiesis. Leukemia 24, 1834–1843 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Ichikawa, M. et al. AML1/Runx1 negatively regulates quiescent hematopoietic stem cells in adult hematopoiesis. J. Immunol. 180, 4402–4408 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Churpek, J. E. et al. Genomic analysis of germ line and somatic variants in familial myelodysplasia/acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 126, 2484–2490 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Brown, A. L. et al. RUNX1-mutated families show phenotype heterogeneity and a somatic mutation profile unique to germline predisposed AML. Blood Adv. 4, 1131–1144 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Mangaonkar, A. A. & Patnaik, M. M. Hereditary predisposition to hematopoietic neoplasms: when bloodline matters for blood cancers. Mayo Clin. Proc. 95, 1482–1498 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Fabre, M. A. et al. Concordance for clonal hematopoiesis is limited in elderly twins. Blood 135, 269–273 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Hansen, J. W. et al. Clonal hematopoiesis in elderly twins: concordance, discordance, and mortality. Blood 135, 261–268 (2020). Fabre et al.103 and Hansen et al.104 are the first studies examining the prevalence of CHIP among twin pairs; these papers also provided the first evidence suggesting some CHIP mutations may be acquired in utero.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Williams, N. et al. Phylogenetic reconstruction of myeloproliferative neoplasm reveals very early origins and lifelong evolution. bioRxiv (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Van Egeren, D. et al. Reconstructing the lineage histories and differentiation trajectories of individual cancer cells in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cell Stem Cell 28, 514–523.e9 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Terao, C. et al. GWAS of mosaic loss of chromosome Y highlights genetic effects on blood cell differentiation. Nat. Commun. 10, 4719 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Laine, J., Künstle, G., Obata, T., Sha, M. & Noguchi, M. The protooncogene TCL1 Is an Akt kinase coactivator. Mol. Cell 6, 395–407 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Virgilio, L. et al. Deregulated expression of TCL1 causes T cell leukemia in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 3885–3889 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Sudlow, C. et al. UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, e1001779 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Nagai, A. et al. Overview of the BioBank Japan Project: Study design and profile. J. Epidemiol. 27 (Suppl. 3), S2–S8 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Madani, N. et al. Implication of the lymphocyte-specific nuclear body protein Sp140 in an innate response to human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 76, 11133–11138 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Li, L., Forman, S. J. & Bhatia, R. Expression of DLK1 in hematopoietic cells results in inhibition of differentiation and proliferation. Oncogene 24, 4472–4476 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Koren, A. et al. Genetic variation in human DNA replication timing. Cell 159, 1015–1026 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Landau, D. A. et al. Mutations driving CLL and their evolution in progression and relapse. Nature 526, 525–530 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Puente, X. S. et al. Non-coding recurrent mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nature 526, 519–524 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Tamura, K. et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is rare, but the proportion of T-CLL is high in Japan. Eur. J. Haematol. 67, 152–157 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Ben-Eghan, C. et al. Don’t ignore genetic data from minority populations. Nature 585, 184–186 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Taliun, D. et al. Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program. Nature 590, 290–299 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Bell, D. W. et al. Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Science 286, 2528 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Vahteristo, P. et al. p53, CHK2, and CHK1 genes in Finnish families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: further evidence of CHK2 in inherited cancer predisposition. Cancer Res. 61, 5718–5722 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Siddiqui, R. et al. The TP53 mutational spectrum and frequency of CHEK2*1100delC in Li-Fraumeni-like kindreds. Fam. Cancer 4, 177–181 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Ruijs, M. W. et al. The contribution of CHEK2 to the TP53-negative Li-Fraumeni phenotype. Hered. Cancer Clin. Pract. 7, 4 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Manoukian, S. et al. Two new CHEK2 germ-line variants detected in breast cancer/sarcoma families negative for BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53 gene mutations. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 130, 207–215 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Malkin, D. et al. Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms. Science 250, 1233–1238 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Chompret, A. et al. P53 germline mutations in childhood cancers and cancer risk for carrier individuals. Br. J. Cancer 82, 1932–1937 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Gonzalez, K. D. et al. Beyond Li fraumeni syndrome: clinical characteristics of families With p53 germline mutations. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 1250–1256 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Carney, J. P. et al. The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell 93, 477–486 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Varon, R. et al. Nibrin, a novel DNA double-strand break repair protein, is mutated in nijmegen breakage syndrome. Cell 93, 467–476 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Bartkova, J. et al. Aberrations of the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 DNA damage sensor complex in human breast cancer: MRE11 as a candidate familial cancer-predisposing gene. Mol. Oncol. 2, 296–316 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Belhadj, S. et al. Candidate genes for hereditary colorectal cancer: mutational screening and systematic review. Hum. Mutat. 41, 1563–1576 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Savitsky, K. et al. A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science 268, 1749–1753 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Suarez, F. et al. Incidence, presentation, and prognosis of malignancies in ataxia-telangiectasia: a report from the French national registry of primary immune deficiencies. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 202–208 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Reiman, A. et al. Lymphoid tumours and breast cancer in ataxia telangiectasia; substantial protective effect of residual ATM kinase activity against childhood tumours. Br. J. Cancer 105, 586–591 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Swift, M., Morrell, D., Massey, R. B. & Chase, C. L. Incidence of cancer in 161 families affected by ataxia–telangiectasia. N. Engl. J. Med. 325, 1831–1836 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Thompson, D. et al. Cancer risks and mortality in heterozygous ATM mutation carriers. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 97, 813–822 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Lu, C. et al. Patterns and functional implications of rare germline variants across 12 cancer types. Nat. Commun. 6, 10086 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Angèle, S. et al. ATM polymorphisms as risk factors for prostate cancer development. Br. J. Cancer 91, 783–787 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Medina, R. et al. The HiNF-P/p220NPAT cell cycle signaling pathway controls nonhistone target genes. Cancer Res. 67, 10334–10342 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Saarinen, S. et al. Exome sequencing reveals germline NPAT mutation as a candidate risk factor for Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 118, 493–498 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Duployez, N. et al. Familial myeloid malignancies with germline TET2 mutation. Leukemia 34, 1450–1453 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Stremenova Spegarova, J. et al. Germline TET2 loss of function causes childhood immunodeficiency and lymphoma. Blood 136, 1055–1066 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Kaasinen, E. et al. Impact of constitutional TET2 haploinsufficiency on molecular and clinical phenotype in humans. Nat. Commun. 10, 1252 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Maslah, N., Cassinat, B., Verger, E., Kiladjian, J. J. & Velazquez, L. The role of LNK/SH2B3 genetic alterations in myeloproliferative neoplasms and other hematological disorders. Leukemia 31, 1661–1670 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Kuo, C.-L. et al. The longevity-associated SH2B3 (LNK) genetic variant: selected aging phenotypes in 379,758 subjects. J. Gerontol. 75, 1656–1662 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Hung, R. J. et al. Cross cancer genomic investigation of inflammation pathway for five common cancers: lung, ovary, prostate, breast, and colorectal cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 107, djv246 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Wang, Y. et al. Tet2-mediated clonal hematopoiesis in nonconditioned mice accelerates age-associated cardiac dysfunction. JCI Insight 5, e135204 (2020).

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Potus, F. et al. Novel mutations and decreased expression of the epigenetic regulator TET2 in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation 141, 1986–2000 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Ko, M. et al. Ten-Eleven-Translocation 2 (TET2) negatively regulates homeostasis and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14566–14571 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Li, Z. et al. Deletion of Tet2 in mice leads to dysregulated hematopoietic stem cells and subsequent development of myeloid malignancies. Blood 118, 4509–4518 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Quivoron, C. et al. TET2 inactivation results in pleiotropic hematopoietic abnormalities in mouse and is a recurrent event during human lymphomagenesis. Cancer Cell 20, 25–38 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Pan, F. et al. Tet2 loss leads to hypermutagenicity in haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 15102 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Levy, D. et al. Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hypertension. Nat. Genet. 41, 677–687 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Newton-Cheh, C. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure. Nat. Genet. 41, 666–676 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Laroumanie, F. et al. LNK deficiency promotes acute aortic dissection and rupture. JCI Insight 3, e122558 (2018).

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Safarova Maya, S. et al. Targeted sequencing study to uncover shared genetic susceptibility between peripheral artery disease and coronary heart disease — brief report. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 39, 1227–1233 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Dichgans, M. et al. Shared genetic susceptibility to ischemic stroke and coronary artery disease: a genome-wide analysis of common variants. Stroke 45, 24–36 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Demanelis, K. et al. Determinants of telomere length across human tissues. Science 369, eaaz6876 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Hosokawa, K. & Arai, F. The role of telomere binding molecules for normal and abnormal hematopoiesis. Int. J. Hematol. 107, 646–655 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Bojesen, S. E. et al. Multiple independent variants at the TERT locus are associated with telomere length and risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Nat. Genet. 45, 371–384 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Melin, B. S., Nordfjäll, K., Andersson, U. & Roos, G. hTERT cancer risk genotypes are associated with telomere length. Genet. Epidemiol. 36, 368–372 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Brown, D. W. et al. Genetically predicted telomere length is associated with clonal somatic copy number alterations in peripheral leukocytes. PLoS Genet. 16, e1009078 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Nakao, T. et al. Bidirectional Mendelian randomization supports bidirectional causality between telomere length and clonal hematopoiesis of intermediate potential. medRxiv (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    McNally, E. J., Luncsford, P. J. & Armanios, M. Long telomeres and cancer risk: the price of cellular immortality. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 3474–3481 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Han, H. et al. Association of TERT polymorphisms and risk of coronary heart disease in a Chinese Han population. Oncotarget 8, 67519–67525 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Bressler, J. et al. Sequence variation in telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) as a determinant of risk of cardiovascular disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. BMC Med. Genet. 16, 52 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Codd, V. et al. Identification of seven loci affecting mean telomere length and their association with disease. Nat. Genet. 45, 422–427 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Maubaret, C. G. et al. Association of TERC and OBFC1 haplotypes with mean leukocyte telomere length and risk for coronary heart disease. PLoS ONE 8, e83122 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Horvath, S. & Raj, K. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 371–384 (2018). This review provides a nuanced overview of epigenetic clocks.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Robertson, N. A. et al. Age-related clonal haemopoiesis is associated with increased epigenetic age. Curr. Biol. 29, R786–R787 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    McCartney, D. L. et al. Genome-wide association studies identify 137 loci for DNA methylation biomarkers of ageing. bioRxiv (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Lu, A. T. et al. GWAS of epigenetic aging rates in blood reveals a critical role for TERT. Nat. Commun. 9, 387 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Izzo, F. et al. DNA methylation disruption reshapes the hematopoietic differentiation landscape. Nat. Genet. 52, 378–387 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Bowman, R. L., Busque, L. & Levine, R. L. Clonal hematopoiesis and evolution to hematopoietic malignancies. Cell Stem Cell 22, 157–170 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Davey Smith, G. & Hemani, G. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, R89–R98 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Holmes, M. V., Ala-Korpela, M. & Smith, G. D. Mendelian randomization in cardiometabolic disease: challenges in evaluating causality. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 14, 577–590 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Bolton, K. L. et al. The clinical management of clonal hematopoiesis: creation of a clonal hematopoiesis clinic. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 34, 357–367 (2020). This paper describes a new type of clinic that focuses on patients with CH.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Scheller Madrid, A. et al. Observational and genetic studies of short telomeres and Alzheimer’s disease in 67,000 and 152,000 individuals: a Mendelian randomization study. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 35, 147–156 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Roake, C. M. & Artandi, S. E. Regulation of human telomerase in homeostasis and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 384–397 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Yeh, J.-K. & Wang, C.-Y. Telomeres and telomerase in cardiovascular diseases. Genes 7, 58 (2016).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Boccardi, V., Pelini, L., Ercolani, S., Ruggiero, C. & Mecocci, P. From cellular senescence to Alzheimer’s disease: the role of telomere shortening. Ageing Res. Rev. 22, 1–8 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Herrmann, M., Pusceddu, I., März, W. & Herrmann, W. Telomere biology and age-related diseases. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 56, 1210–1222 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Wu, X., Dong, X., Liu, W. & Chen, J. Characterization of CHEK2 mutations in prostate cancer. Hum. Mutat. 27, 742–747 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Nanda, N. & Roberts, N. J. ATM serine/threonine kinase and its role in pancreatic risk. Genes 11, 108 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Teitell, M. A. The TCL1 family of oncoproteins: co-activators of transformation. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 640–648 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Lio, C.-W. J., Yuita, H. & Rao, A. Dysregulation of the TET family of epigenetic regulators in lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. Blood 134, 1487–1497 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Ryan, S. D. et al. Up-regulation of the mitotic checkpoint component Mad1 causes chromosomal instability and resistance to microtubule poisons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2205–E2214 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Klco, J. M. & Mullighan, C. G. Advances in germline predisposition to acute leukaemias and myeloid neoplasms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 122–137 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Hazawa, M. et al. Disease-specific alteration of karyopherin-α subtype establishes feed-forward oncogenic signaling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene 39, 2212–2223 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Wang, M. et al. Prognostic significance of TRIM59 for cancer patient survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 98, e18024 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Aniththa, T. et al. Gfi1b: a key player in the genesis and maintenance of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematologica 103, 614–625 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  192. 192.

    Plo, I. et al. Genetic alterations of the thrombopoietin/MPL/JAK2 axis impacting megakaryopoiesis. Front. Endocrinol. 8, 234 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Vainchenker, W. & Kralovics, R. Genetic basis and molecular pathophysiology of classical myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 129, 667–679 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. 194.

    Jakobsdottir, J. et al. Rare functional variant in TM2D3 is associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006327 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  195. 195.

    Rick, J. W. et al. Fibronectin in malignancy: cancer-specific alterations, protumoral effects, and therapeutic implications. Semin. Oncol. 46, 284–290 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  196. 196.

    Watson, I. R., Irwin, M. S. & Ohh, M. NEDD8 pathways in cancer, sine quibus non. Cancer Cell 19, 168–176 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  197. 197.

    He, H. et al. A truncating germline mutation of TINF2 in individuals with thyroid cancer or melanoma results in longer telomeres. Thyroid 30, 204–213 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  198. 198.

    Rahman, S., Canny, M. D., Buschmann, T. A. & Latham, M. P. A survey of reported disease-related mutations in the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex. Cells 9, 1678 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  199. 199.

    Bolli, N. et al. Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 5, 2997 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  200. 200.

    Huang, P. et al. Association of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease with germline-generated high affinity self-antigen load. Transl. Psychiatry 10, 146 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  201. 201.

    Wang, Z.-X. et al. Genetic association of HLA gene variants with MRI brain structure in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 54, 3195–3204 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  202. 202.

    Steele, N. Z. R. et al. Fine-mapping of the human leukocyte antigen locus as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease: a case–control study. PLoS Med. 14, e1002272 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  203. 203.

    Bykov, V. J. N., Eriksson, S. E., Bianchi, J. & Wiman, K. G. Targeting mutant p53 for efficient cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 89–102 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  204. 204.

    Singh, R., Letai, A. & Sarosiek, K. Regulation of apoptosis in health and disease: the balancing act of BCL-2 family proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 175–193 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  205. 205.

    Silva, A. G. et al. Germline BAX deletion in a patient with melanoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 108, 1372–1375 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  206. 206.

    Ionov, Y., Yamamoto, H., Krajewski, S., Reed, J. C. & Perucho, M. Mutational inactivation of the proapoptotic gene BAX confers selective advantage during tumor clonal evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10872–10877 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  207. 207.

    Han, Y. et al. DriverML: a machine learning algorithm for identifying driver genes in cancer sequencing studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e45 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  208. 208.

    Wang, X. et al. Centromere protein U expression promotes non-small-cell lung cancer cell proliferation through FOXM1 and predicts poor survival. Cancer Manag. Res. 10, 6971–6984 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  209. 209.

    Ding, X., Duan, H. & Luo, H. Identification of core gene expression signature and key pathways in colorectal cancer. Front. Genet. 11, 45 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


A.J.S. received financial support from the Ann Melly Summer Scholarship in Oncology and from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award F30DK127699 from the US National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and grant T32GM007347 from the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS). A.G.B. is supported by a Burroughs Wellcome Foundation career award for medical scientists and an NIH Director’s Early Independence Award from the National Institute of Health Common Fund (DP5 OD029586). M.R.S. is a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Clinical Scholar and receives funding from the E.P. Evans Foundation, The Biff Ruttenberg Foundation, the Adventure Allie Fund, the Beverly and George Rawlings Directorship, and the NIH. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author information




Each of the authors contributed to all aspects of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Savona.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.J.S. and A.G.B. declare no competing interests. M.R.S. receives research funding from ALX Oncology, Astex, Incyte, Takeda and TG Therapeutics; has equity with Karyopharm; and serves as an advisor or consultant to AbbVie, Astex, BMS, Geron, Incyte, Karyopharm, Ryvu, Sierra Oncology, Takeda, Taiho and TG Therapeutics.

Additional information

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Genetics thanks G. Vassiliou and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


Haematopoietic stem cells

(HSCs). Cells that are responsible for the creation of all blood cells in the human body and are multipotent in that they may differentiate into any type of mature blood cell. They are found in the bone marrow in adult humans.


Variation in the genome arising from changes happening over the lifespan of an organism.

Clonal haematopoiesis

(CH). The presence of many blood cells originating from a single mutant stem or progenitor cell.


Variation in the genome arising from DNA that is passed from the parent to the offspring.

Mosaic loss of the Y chromosome

(mLOY). A common type of clonal haematopoiesis affecting XY individuals which is associated with the complete absence of the Y chromosome in the clonal cell population.

Mosaic chromosomal alterations

(mCAs). A type of clonal haematopoiesis in which a portion of the genome has been duplicated (copy number gain), lost (copy number loss) or replaced with DNA from another allele (copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity).

CH with unknown drivers

This is CH in which there is no evidence of a genetic mutation that is known to cause clonal expansion. In such cases, clonality may be ascertained by the presence of a unique pattern of somatic mutations throughout the genome that is only present in a subset of cells.

CH of indeterminate potential

(CHIP). A clinical term for a type of clonal haematopoiesis defined by single-nucleotide variants or small insertions/deletions (indels) in genes associated with myeloid malignancies in the presence of normal blood counts and at ≥2% variant allele fraction.

Variant allele fraction

(VAF). The percentage of measured DNA alleles that contain a specified variant. For example, if half of a population of diploid cells each harboured a single copy of JAK2V617F, the variant allele fraction for this mutation would be 25%.

Acute myeloid leukaemia

(AML). A blood cancer characterized by improper maturation of the myeloid lineage (monocytes and granulocytes), resulting in the production of many dysfunctional immature cells called blasts.

HSC transplantation

(HSCT). The provision of donor HSCs to patients with various types of malignant and non-malignant conditions. Autologous or allogeneic donor HSCs are provided to recipients after conditioning regimens of radiation and/or chemotherapy.

Allogeneic HSCT

HSCT involving the transplantation of histocompatible HSCs from a non-self donor to a recipient.

Autologous HSCT

HSCT involving the harvest of patient HSCs to be provided later as a ‘stem cell rescue’ after high-dose chemotherapy.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms

(MPNs). Haematological malignancies generally defined by the overproduction of myeloid cells, red blood cells or platelets.

Myelodysplastic syndromes

(MDS). A set of haematological malignancies with abnormal appearing cells within the bone marrow and reduced production of mature blood cells without increased levels of immature blasts.

Haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

(HSPCs). A population of blood cells that includes multipotent HSCs but also more differentiated progenitor cells that are capable of producing many daughter cells but only within restricted lineages.


mCAs in cis refers to an mCA lesion that affects the portion of the genome containing the risk allele.


mCAs in trans refers to an mCA lesion affecting a different part of the genome than the DNA on which the risk allele is located.

DNA methylation

The presence of methyl groups added to the DNA base, often occurring on cytosine adjacent to a guanine (CpG). The methylation of DNA in gene promoter sequences may reduce gene expression.

Accelerated epigenetic ageing

Contrary to an individual’s chronological age defined by the passage of time, an individual’s epigenetic age is a measure of how the pattern of DNA methylation compares to the average pattern observed in the population across all ages. Accelerated epigenetic age means one’s DNA methylation pattern is more similar to the average for individuals who are chronologically older than oneself.

Horizontal pleiotropy

In Mendelian randomization, when a genetic variant exerts its effects on a measured outcome through mechanisms separate from the pathway being studied.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silver, A.J., Bick, A.G. & Savona, M.R. Germline risk of clonal haematopoiesis. Nat Rev Genet 22, 603–617 (2021).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing