Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is often grouped with other brain-related phenotypes into a broader category of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). In clinical practice, providers need to decide which genes to test in individuals with ASD phenotypes, which requires an understanding of the level of evidence for individual NDD genes that supports an association with ASD. Consensus is currently lacking about which NDD genes have sufficient evidence to support a relationship to ASD. Estimates of the number of genes relevant to ASD differ greatly among research groups and clinical sequencing panels, varying from a few to several hundred. This Roadmap discusses important considerations necessary to provide an evidence-based framework for the curation of NDD genes based on the level of information supporting a clinically relevant relationship between a given gene and ASD.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
MYT1L haploinsufficiency in human neurons and mice causes autism-associated phenotypes that can be reversed by genetic and pharmacologic intervention
Molecular Psychiatry Open Access 14 February 2023
-
Disruption of DDX53 coding sequence has limited impact on iPSC-derived human NGN2 neurons
BMC Medical Genomics Open Access 12 January 2023
-
Barriers to genetic testing in clinical psychiatry and ways to overcome them: from clinicians’ attitudes to sociocultural differences between patients across the globe
Translational Psychiatry Open Access 11 October 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout



References
Lai, M. C., Lombardo, M. V. & Baron-Cohen, S. Autism. Lancet 383, 896–910 (2014).
Tammimies, K. et al. Molecular diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray analysis and whole-exome sequencing in children with autism spectrum disorder. JAMA 314, 895–903 (2015). This paper shows among a heterogeneous sample of children with ASD that the diagnostic yield was higher in children with more complex morphological phenotypes.
Feliciano, P. et al. Exome sequencing of 457 autism families recruited online provides evidence for autism risk genes. NPJ Genom. Med. 4, 19 (2019).
Sanders, S. J. et al. Insights into autism spectrum disorder genomic architecture and biology from 71 risk loci. Neuron 87, 1215–1233 (2015). This large study uses microarray and sequencing data to reveal strong evidence that de novo mutations are associated with ASD apart from the risk for ID.
Ronemus, M., Iossifov, I., Levy, D. & Wigler, M. The role of de novo mutations in the genetics of autism spectrum disorders. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 133–141 (2014).
Shen, Y. et al. Clinical genetic testing for patients with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 125, e727–e735 (2010).
Weiner, D. J. et al. Polygenic transmission disequilibrium confirms that common and rare variation act additively to create risk for autism spectrum disorders. Nat. Genet. 49, 978–985 (2017). This important study demonstrates that polygenic variation contributes additively to risk in individuals with ASD who carry a presumed penetrant de novo variant.
Barton, K. S. et al. Pathways from autism spectrum disorder diagnosis to genetic testing. Genet. Med. 20, 737–744 (2018).
Hoang, N., Cytrynbaum, C. & Scherer, S. W. Communicating complex genomic information: a counselling approach derived from research experience with autism spectrum disorder. Patient Educ. Couns. 101, 352–361 (2018).
Geschwind, D. H. & State, M. W. Gene hunting in autism spectrum disorder: on the path to precision medicine. Lancet Neurol. 14, 1109–1120 (2015).
Vorstman, J. A. S. et al. Autism genetics: opportunities and challenges for clinical translation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 362–376 (2017).
American Psychiatric Association & DSM Task Force. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) 5th edn (APA, 2013).
Lord, C. & Bishop, S. L. Recent advances in autism research as reflected in DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 11, 53–70 (2015). This review of advances in scientific knowledge about ASD uses DSM-5 diagnostic criteria as a framework for the discussion.
Sanders, S. J. Next-generation sequencing in autism spectrum disorder. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 9, a026872 (2019).
Ganna, A. et al. Quantifying the impact of rare and ultra-rare coding variation across the phenotypic spectrum. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 102, 1204–1211 (2018).
He, Z., Xu, B., Buxbaum, J. & Ionita-Laza, I. A genome-wide scan statistic framework for whole-genome sequence data analysis. Nat. Commun. 10, 3018 (2019).
Werling, D. M. et al. An analytical framework for whole-genome sequence association studies and its implications for autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Genet. 50, 727–736 (2018).
Hoang, N., Buchanan, J. A. & Scherer, S. W. Heterogeneity in clinical sequencing tests marketed for autism spectrum disorders. NPJ Genom. Med. 3, 27 (2018). This paper presents a comprehensive survey of sequencing tests for ASD that are primarily being marketed by commercial laboratories as adjuncts or follow-up to chromosomal microarrays.
Strande, N. T. et al. Evaluating the clinical validity of gene–disease associations: an evidence-based framework developed by the clinical genome resource. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 100, 895–906 (2017). This work presents the latest ClinGen classifications and framework recommendations to assess the strength of gene–disease relationships.
Smith, E. D. et al. Classification of genes: standardized clinical validity assessment of gene–disease associations aids diagnostic exome analysis and reclassifications. Hum. Mutat. 38, 600–608 (2017).
Rehm, H. L. et al. ClinGen—the clinical genome resource. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 2235–2242 (2015).
Rivera-Munoz, E. A. et al. ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panel experiences and standardized processes for disease and gene-level specification of the ACMG/AMP guidelines for sequence variant interpretation. Hum. Mutat. 39, 1614–1622 (2018).
Angione, K., Gibbons, M. & Demarest, S. An objective method for evaluating next-generation sequencing panels. J. Child Neurol. 34, 139–143 (2018).
Pitini, E. et al. How is genetic testing evaluated? A systematic review of the literature. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 26, 605–615 (2018).
Sahin, M. & Sur, M. Genes, circuits, and precision therapies for autism and related neurodevelopmental disorders. Science 350, aab3897 (2015).
Bale, T. L. et al. Early life programming and neurodevelopmental disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 68, 314–319 (2010).
Gray, S. J. Gene therapy and neurodevelopmental disorders. Neuropharmacology 68, 136–142 (2013).
Gonzalez-Mantilla, A. J., Moreno-De-Luca, A., Ledbetter, D. H. & Martin, C. L. A cross-disorder method to identify novel candidate genes for developmental brain disorders. JAMA Psychiatry 73, 275–283 (2016).
Moreno-De-Luca, A. et al. Developmental brain dysfunction: revival and expansion of old concepts based on new genetic evidence. Lancet Neurol. 12, 406–414 (2013). This conceptual paper hypothesizes for the many ASD-relevant genes currently described as variably penetrant that, when the disorders encompassed by developmental brain dysfunction are considered as a group, the penetrance of these genes may approach 100%.
Srivastava, S. et al. Meta-analysis and multidisciplinary consensus statement: exome sequencing is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. Genet. Med. 21, 2413–2421 (2019). This scoping review and meta-analysis leads to recommendations that exome sequencing should become a first-tier diagnostic test for NDDs, including ASD.
Carter, M. T. & Scherer, S. W. Autism spectrum disorder in the genetics clinic: a review. Clin. Genet. 83, 399–407 (2013).
Yuen, R. K. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of quartet families with autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Med. 21, 185–191 (2015). This study finds that affected siblings can carry different ASD-relevant mutations, and when they do, they tend to demonstrate more clinical variability than those who share a variant.
Yuen, R. K. et al. Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 602–611 (2017). Using genome sequence and comprehensive annotation, this study finds that participants bearing mutations in ASD-relevant genes have lower adaptive ability than those who do not.
Satterstrom, F. K. et al. Large-scale exome sequencing study implicates both developmental and functional changes in the neurobiology of autism. Cell 180, 568–584.e23 (2020). This large-scale exome sequencing study shows many ASD-relevant genes as conferring risk for ASD or for ASD with neurodevelopmental delay, based on whether a gene has a higher frequency of disruptive de novo variants in ASD or neurodevelopmental delay.
Matson, J. L. & Shoemaker, M. Intellectual disability and its relationship to autism spectrum disorders. Res. Dev. Disabil. 30, 1107–1114 (2009).
Skuse, D. H. Rethinking the nature of genetic vulnerability to autistic spectrum disorders. Trends Genet. 23, 387–395 (2007). This important discussion of the relationship between ASD and ID includes the idea that the presence of both characteristics in an individual increases the clinical ascertainment.
Shattuck, P. T. The contribution of diagnostic substitution to the growing administrative prevalence of autism in US special education. Pediatrics 117, 1028–1037 (2006).
Nevison, C. D. & Blaxill, M. Diagnostic substitution for intellectual disability: a flawed explanation for the rise in autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 47, 2733–2742 (2017).
Croen, L. A., Grether, J. K., Hoogstrate, J. & Selvin, S. The changing prevalence of autism in California. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 32, 207–215 (2002).
Ingram, D. H., Mayes, S. D., Troxell, L. B. & Calhoun, S. L. Assessing children with autism, mental retardation, and typical development using the playground observation checklist. Autism 11, 311–319 (2007).
Ventola, P. et al. Differentiating between autism spectrum disorders and other developmental disabilities in children who failed a screening instrument for ASD. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37, 425–436 (2007).
Pedersen, A. L. et al. DSM criteria that best differentiate intellectual disability from autism spectrum disorder. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 48, 537–545 (2017).
Mooney, E. L., Gray, K. M. & Tonge, B. J. Early features of autism: repetitive behaviours in young children. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 15, 12–18 (2006).
Osterling, J. A., Dawson, G. & Munson, J. A. Early recognition of 1-year-old infants with autism spectrum disorder versus mental retardation. Dev. Psychopathol. 14, 239–251 (2002).
Baranek, G. T. Autism during infancy: a retrospective video analysis of sensory-motor and social behaviors at 9–12 months of age. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 29, 213–224 (1999).
Clifford, S. M. & Dissanayake, C. The early development of joint attention in infants with autistic disorder using home video observations and parental interview. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 38, 791–805 (2008).
Mitchell, S., Cardy, J. O. & Zwaigenbaum, L. Differentiating autism spectrum disorder from other developmental delays in the first two years of life. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 17, 130–140 (2011).
Brereton, A. V., Tonge, B. J. & Einfeld, S. L. Psychopathology in children and adolescents with autism compared to young people with intellectual disability. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 36, 863–870 (2006).
Barrett, B. et al. Comparing service use and costs among adolescents with autism spectrum disorders, special needs and typical development. Autism 19, 562–569 (2015).
Weitlauf, A. S. et al. Therapies for children with autism spectrum disorder: behavioral interventions update (US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2014).
Helbig, I. et al. The ClinGen Epilepsy Gene Curation Expert Panel—bridging the divide between clinical domain knowledge and formal gene curation criteria. Hum. Mutat. 39, 1476–1484 (2018).
World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (WHO, 2004).
Fernandez, B. A. & Scherer, S. W. Syndromic autism spectrum disorders: moving from a clinically defined to a molecularly defined approach. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 19, 353–371 (2017).
Leblond, C. S. et al. Meta-analysis of SHANK mutations in autism spectrum disorders: a gradient of severity in cognitive impairments. PLOS Genet. 10, e1004580 (2014). This study of the SHANK1, SHANK2 and SHANK3 genes in ASD demonstrates that mutations are detected in the entire spectrum of autism with a gradient of severity in cognitive impairment.
Niarchou, M. et al. Psychiatric disorders in children with 16p11.2 deletion and duplication. Transl. Psychiatry 9, 8 (2019).
Weiss, L. A. et al. Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 667–675 (2008).
Vorstman, J. A. et al. The 22q11.2 deletion in children: high rate of autistic disorders and early onset of psychotic symptoms. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 45, 1104–1113 (2006).
Fiksinski, A. M. et al. Understanding the pediatric psychiatric phenotype of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 176, 2182–2191 (2018).
Soorya, L. et al. Prospective investigation of autism and genotype–phenotype correlations in 22q13 deletion syndrome and SHANK3 deficiency. Mol. Autism 4, 18 (2013).
De Rubeis, S. et al. Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism. Nature 515, 209–215 (2014).
Iossifov, I. et al. The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder. Nature 515, 216–221 (2014).
Bernier, R. et al. Disruptive CHD8 mutations define a subtype of autism early in development. Cell 158, 263–276 (2014). This next-generation sequencing study identifies disruptions in CHD8 to define a distinct ASD subtype and reveal comorbidities between brain development and enteric innervation.
Sanders, S. J. et al. A framework for the investigation of rare genetic disorders in neuropsychiatry. Nat. Med. 25, 1477–1487 (2019).
Frazier, T. W. et al. Molecular and phenotypic abnormalities in individuals with germline heterozygous PTEN mutations and autism. Mol. Psychiatry 20, 1132–1138 (2015).
Fernandez, B. A. et al. Phenotypic spectrum associated with de novo and inherited deletions and duplications at 16p11.2 in individuals ascertained for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. J. Med. Genet. 47, 195–203 (2010).
D’Angelo, D. et al. Defining the effect of the 16p11.2 duplication on cognition, behavior, and medical comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry 73, 20–30 (2016).
Ross, P. J. et al. Synaptic dysfunction in human neurons with autism-associated deletions in PTCHD1-AS. Biol. Psychiatry 87, 139–149 (2019).
De Rubeis, S. & Buxbaum, J. D. Genetics and genomics of autism spectrum disorder: embracing complexity. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, R24–R31 (2015).
Lim, E. T. et al. Rates, distribution and implications of postzygotic mosaic mutations in autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1217–1224 (2017). This exome sequencing study identifies that somatic mutations constitute a significant proportion of de novo mutations and can contribute importantly to ASD phenotypes.
Lai, M. C., Baron-Cohen, S. & Buxbaum, J. D. Understanding autism in the light of sex/gender. Mol. Autism 6, 24 (2015).
Paaby, A. B. & Rockman, M. V. The many faces of pleiotropy. Trends Genet. 29, 66–73 (2013).
Vorstman, J. A. & Ophoff, R. A. Genetic causes of developmental disorders. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 26, 128–136 (2013).
Depienne, C. et al. Mechanisms for variable expressivity of inherited SCN1A mutations causing Dravet syndrome. J. Med. Genet. 47, 404–410 (2010).
Bassett, A. S. et al. Rare genome-wide copy number variation and expression of schizophrenia in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Am. J. Psychiatry 174, 1054–1063 (2017).
Pizzo, L. et al. Rare variants in the genetic background modulate cognitive and developmental phenotypes in individuals carrying disease-associated variants. Genet. Med. 21, 816–825 (2019).
An, J. Y. et al. Genome-wide de novo risk score implicates promoter variation in autism spectrum disorder. Science 362, eaat6576 (2018).
Garg, P. & Sharp, A. J. Screening for rare epigenetic variations in autism and schizophrenia. Hum. Mutat. 40, 952–961 (2019).
Andrews, S. V. et al. Case–control meta-analysis of blood DNA methylation and autism spectrum disorder. Mol. Autism 9, 40 (2018).
Hagerman, R., Au, J. & Hagerman, P. FMR1 premutation and full mutation molecular mechanisms related to autism. J. Neurodev. Disord. 3, 211–224 (2011).
Modabbernia, A., Velthorst, E. & Reichenberg, A. Environmental risk factors for autism: an evidence-based review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Mol. Autism 8, 13 (2017).
Grove, J. et al. Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Genet. 51, 431–444 (2019).
Coe, B. P. et al. Neurodevelopmental disease genes implicated by de novo mutation and copy number variation morbidity. Nat. Genet. 51, 106–116 (2019).
Jacquemont, S. et al. A higher mutational burden in females supports a “female protective model” in neurodevelopmental disorders. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 94, 415–425 (2014).
Larsen, E. et al. A systematic variant annotation approach for ranking genes associated with autism spectrum disorders. Mol. Autism 7, 44 (2016).
Abrahams, B. S. et al. SFARI Gene 2.0: a community-driven knowledgebase for the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Mol. Autism 4, 36 (2013).
Hyman, S. L., Levy, S. E. & Myers, S. M., Council on Children with Disabilities, Section on Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. Identification, evaluation, and management of children with autism spectrum disorder. Pediatrics 145, e20193447 (2020).
Iakoucheva, L. M., Muotri, A. R. & Sebat, J. Getting to the cores of autism. Cell 178, 1287–1298 (2019).
Clinical Genome Resource Gene Curation Working Group. Gene clinical validity curation process standard operating procedure. Version 7. Clinical Genome https://clinicalgenome.org/docs/summary-of-updates-to-the-clingen-gene-clinical-validity-curation-sop-version-7/ (2019).
Robinson, E. B., Lichtenstein, P., Anckarsater, H., Happe, F. & Ronald, A. Examining and interpreting the female protective effect against autistic behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 5258–5262 (2013).
Pinto, D. et al. Convergence of genes and cellular pathways dysregulated in autism spectrum disorders. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 94, 677–694 (2014).
Lionel, A. C. et al. Disruption of the ASTN2/TRIM32 locus at 9q33.1 is a risk factor in males for autism spectrum disorders, ADHD and other neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, 2752–2768 (2014).
Woodbury-Smith, M. et al. Variable phenotype expression in a family segregating microdeletions of the NRXN1 and MBD5 autism spectrum disorder susceptibility genes. NPJ Genom. Med. 2, 17 (2017).
Leppa, V. M. et al. Rare inherited and de novo CNVs reveal complex contributions to ASD risk in multiplex families. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 99, 540–554 (2016).
Yu, T. W. et al. Using whole-exome sequencing to identify inherited causes of autism. Neuron 77, 259–273 (2013).
Rejeb, I. et al. First case report of Cohen syndrome in the Tunisian population caused by VPS13B mutations. BMC Med. Genet. 18, 134 (2017).
Daoud, H. et al. Autism and nonsyndromic mental retardation associated with a de novo mutation in the NLGN4X gene promoter causing an increased expression level. Biol. Psychiatry 66, 906–910 (2009).
Risi, S. et al. Combining information from multiple sources in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 45, 1094–1103 (2006).
Wang, T. et al. De novo genic mutations among a Chinese autism spectrum disorder cohort. Nat. Commun. 7, 13316 (2016).
Li, J. et al. Targeted sequencing and functional analysis reveal brain-size-related genes and their networks in autism spectrum disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 22, 1282–1290 (2017).
Sato, D. et al. SHANK1 deletions in males with autism spectrum disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 90, 879–887 (2012).
Zhang, L. et al. A promoter variant in ZNF804A decreasing its expression increases the risk of autism spectrum disorder in the Han Chinese population. Transl. Psychiatry 9, 31 (2019).
Gouder, L. et al. Altered spinogenesis in iPSC-derived cortical neurons from patients with autism carrying de novo SHANK3 mutations. Sci. Rep. 9, 94 (2019).
Khalil, R. et al. PSMD12 haploinsufficiency in a neurodevelopmental disorder with autistic features. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 177, 736–745 (2018).
Pascolini, G. et al. Autism spectrum disorder in a patient with a genomic rearrangement that only involves the EPHA5 gene. Psychiatr. Genet. 29, 86–90 (2019).
O’Roak, B. J. et al. Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations. Nature 485, 246–250 (2012).
Manning, M. A. et al. Terminal 22q deletion syndrome: a newly recognized cause of speech and language disability in the autism spectrum. Pediatrics 114, 451–457 (2004).
Merner, N. et al. A de novo frameshift mutation in chromodomain helicase DNA-binding domain 8 (CHD8): a case report and literature review. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 170, 1225–1235 (2016).
Imaizumi, T., Kumakura, A., Yamamoto-Shimojima, K., Ondo, Y. & Yamamoto, T. Identification of a rare homozygous SZT2 variant due to uniparental disomy in a patient with a neurodevelopmental disorder. Intractable Rare Dis. Res. 7, 245–250 (2018).
Acknowledgements
C.P.S. is supported by CDMRP Grant AR160154, the Foundation for Prader-Willi Research, the NR2F1 Foundation and the USP7 Foundation. K.A.D. is supported by the Boston Children’s Hospital Neuroscience Clinical Cluster grant. E.H.C. is supported by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grant R01MH110920. P.S. is supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) funding. S.W.S. is supported by the GlaxoSmithKline–CIHR Endowed Chair in Genome Sciences at the Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto. J.A.S.V. is funded by NIMH grant 1U01MH119741–01 and CIHR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.P.S., C.B., N.H., J.H., O.R. and J.A.S.V. researched the literature. C.P.S., C.B., R.K.C.Y., J.R.P., D.H.S., L.G., R.A.B., J.A.B., J.D.B., C.-A.C., K.A.D., M.E., H.V.F., T.F., N.H., J.H., C.M., J.L.M., P.S., W.K.C., P.F.B., E.H.C., S.W.S. and J.A.S.V. provided substantial contributions to discussions of the content. C.P.S., C.B., N.H., S.W.S. and J.A.S.V. wrote the article. C.P.S., C.B., R.K.C.Y., J.R.P., D.H.S., L.G., R.A.B., J.A.B., J.D.B., K.A.D., M.E., H.V.F., T.F., N.H., J.H., C.M., J.L.M., P.S., W.K.C., P.F.B., E.H.C., S.W.S. and J.A.S.V. reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
H.V.F. is a section editor for Genetics for UpToDate. W.K.C. declares that she is part of the Regeneron Genetics Center Scientific Advisory Board. S.W.S. declares that he is part of scientific advisory committees and/or has intellectual property licensed to Deep Genomics, Population Bio, Lineagen and Athena Diagnostics.
Additional information
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Genetics thanks D. Amaral and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schaaf, C.P., Betancur, C., Yuen, R.K.C. et al. A framework for an evidence-based gene list relevant to autism spectrum disorder. Nat Rev Genet 21, 367–376 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-0231-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-0231-2
This article is cited by
-
Disruption of DDX53 coding sequence has limited impact on iPSC-derived human NGN2 neurons
BMC Medical Genomics (2023)
-
Genetics of autism spectrum disorders and future direction
Journal of Human Genetics (2023)
-
Childhood Academic Performance: A Potential Marker of Genetic Liability to Autism
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (2023)
-
Artificial intelligence-based approaches for improving the diagnosis, triage, and prioritization of autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review of current trends and open issues
Artificial Intelligence Review (2023)
-
Brief Report: Evaluating the Diagnostic Yield of Commercial Gene Panels in Autism
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (2023)