Barrett oesophagus is not detected before its progression to oesophageal adenocarcinoma in over one-half of patients, and improvements in screening for Barrett oesophagus in primary care could substantially reduce mortality associated with this cancer. Advances in screening technology will help, but collaboration of gastroenterologists with primary care providers is essential.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References
Shaheen, N. J. et al. Diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus: an updated ACG guideline. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 117, 559–587 (2022).
Tan, M. C. et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: prevalence of prior and concurrent Barrett’s oesophagus in oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15760 (2020).
Codipilly, D. C. et al. The effect of endoscopic surveillance in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 154, 2068–2086.e5 (2018).
Fitzgerald, R. C. et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 63, 7–42 (2014).
Eluri, S. et al. Low prevalence of endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus in a screening-eligible primary care population. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 117, 1764–1771 (2022).
Stewart, M. et al. Missed opportunities to screen for Barrett’s esophagus in the primary care setting of a large health system. Gastrointest. Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.010 (2023).
Fitzgerald, R. C. et al. Cytosponge-trefoil factor 3 versus usual care to identify Barrett’s oesophagus in a primary care setting: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 396, 333–344 (2020).
Ross-Innes, C. S. et al. Evaluation of a minimally invasive cell sampling device coupled with assessment of trefoil factor 3 expression for diagnosing Barrett’s esophagus: a multi-center case–control study. PLoS Med. 12, e1001780 (2015).
Moinova, H. R. et al. Identifying DNA methylation biomarkers for non-endoscopic detection of Barrett’s esophagus. Sci. Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aao5848 (2018).
Iyer, P. G. et al. Validation of a methylated DNA marker panel for the nonendoscopic detection of Barrett’s esophagus in a multisite case-control study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 94, 498–505 (2021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.J.T. receives research support from Lucid Diagnostics and is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Exact Science, Lucid Diagnostic and Pentax Medical. N.J.S. receives research funding from Interpace Diagnostics, Lucid Diagnostics, Medtronic, Pentax Medical and Steris, and is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Cernostics, CDx Diagnostics, Cook Medical, Exact Sciences and Phathom.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trindade, A.J., Shaheen, N.J. Screening for Barrett oesophagus — a call for collaboration between gastroenterology and primary care. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 20, 342–343 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-023-00773-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-023-00773-4