Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

GUT MICROBIOTA

Balancing the risks and rewards of live biotherapeutics

Live biotherapeutics have been used clinically both as defined probiotics and as undefined faecal microbiota transplants. Two new studies illustrate the risks of administering live microorganisms to highly compromised patients. These risks should be considered in the context of the potential therapeutic value of these treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. DeFilipp, Z. et al. Drug-resistant E. coli bacteremia transmitted by fecal microbiota transplant. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 2043–2050 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yelin, I. et al. Genomic and epidemiological evidence of bacterial transmission from probiotic capsule to blood in ICU patients. Nat. Med. 25, 1728–1732 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hill, C. Virulence or niche factors: what’s in a name? J. Bacteriol. 194, 5725–5727 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Important safety alert regarding use of fecal microbiota for transplantation and risk of serious adverse reactions due to transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms. fda.gov https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/important-safety-alert-regarding-use-fecal-microbiota-transplantation-and-risk-serious-adverse (2019).

  5. Lai, C. Y. et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: review of donor features, procedures and outcomes in 168 clinical studies of faecal microbiota transplantation. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 49, 354–363 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ott, S. J. et al. Efficacy of sterile fecal filtrate transfer for treating patients with Clostridium difficile infection. Gut 152, 799–811 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dominguez-Bello, M. G. et al. Partial restoration of the microbiota of cesarean-born infants via vaginal microbial transfer. Nat. Med. 22, 250–253 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin Hill.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

C.H. is a board member of the International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hill, C. Balancing the risks and rewards of live biotherapeutics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 17, 133–134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0254-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0254-3

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing