Perspective | Published:


Obesity and the future of food policies that promote healthy diets

Nature Reviews Endocrinologyvolume 14pages430437 (2018) | Download Citation


Currently, an unhealthy diet is the largest modifiable factor in ill health and death globally. One of the important contributors to unhealthy diets is the pervasiveness of unhealthy food and drink in our daily food environments. Although efforts to build nutrition skills and education across communities are critical, they will be insufficient without substantial changes to the food environments themselves. Here, I discuss how we can improve our food environments by implementing a comprehensive, multilevel and multisetting approach. This approach needs to encompass the various policy contexts for improving population nutrition, from policy set by national governments to that introduced by local community organizations and food retailers. Clinicians can help implement and set healthy food policies across all our health-care settings, even in the absence of government action. To support a comprehensive suite of effective policies, we need to systematically develop and disseminate the evidence for the feasibility, effectiveness and sustainability of workable policies and to understand their role in the development of a healthier food system.

  • Subscribe to Nature Reviews Endocrinology for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

Additional information

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Global Burden of Disease Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388, 1659–1724 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Non-Communicable Disease Risk Factor Collaboration. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet 387, 1377–1396 (2016).

  3. 3.

    United States Department of Agriculture. Dietary guidelines for Americans 2015-2020, Eighth edition. DietaryGuidelines (2015).

  4. 4.

    Australian Government, National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian dietary guidelines (2013). NHMRC (2013).

  5. 5.

    Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4364.0.55.003 - Australian health survey: updated results, 2011–2012. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013).

  6. 6.

    Hawkes, C. et al. Smart food policies for obesity prevention. Lancet 9985, 2410–2421 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Swinburn, B. A. et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet 378, 804–814 (2011).

  8. 8.

    McKinsey Global Institute. Overcoming obesity: an initial economic analysis. McKinsey Global Institute (2014).

  9. 9.

    Chung, A. et al. Trends in child and adolescent obesity prevalence in economically advanced countries according to socioeconomic position: a systematic review. Obes. Rev. 17, 276–295 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Peeters, A. & Blake, M. R. Socioeconomic inequalities in diet quality: from identifying the problem to implementing solutions. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 5, 150–159 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Hawkes, C. Food policies for healthy populations and healthy economies. BMJ 344, e2801 (2012).

  12. 12.

    Hawkes, C., Jewell, J. & Allen, K. A food policy package for healthy diets and the prevention of obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases: the NOURISHING framework. Obes. Rev. 14 (Suppl. 2), 159–168 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Sacks, G., Swinburn, B. & Lawrence, M. Obesity policy action framework and analysis grids for a comprehensive policy approach to reducing obesity. Obes. Rev. 10, 76–86 (2009).

  14. 14.

    Sacks, G., Swinburn, B. A. & Lawrence, M. A. A systematic policy approach to changing the food system and physical activity environments to prevent obesity. Aust. New Zealand Health Policy 5, 13 (2008).

  15. 15.

    von Philipsborn, P. et al. Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2016).

  16. 16.

    Friel, S., Labonte, R. & Sanders, D. Measuring progress on diet-related NCDs: the need to address the causes of the causes. Lancet 381, 903–904 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Friel, S. et al. Using systems science to understand the determinants of inequities in healthy eating. PLoS ONE 12, e0188872 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Kraak, V. I., Englund, T., Misyak, S. & Serrano, E. L. A novel marketing mix and choice architecture framework to nudge restaurant customers toward healthy food environments to reduce obesity in the United States. Obes. Rev. 18, 852–868 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Hollands, G. J. et al. Altering micro-environments to change population health behaviour: towards an evidence base for choice architecture interventions. BMC Public Health 13, 1218 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Rutter, H. et al. The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. Lancet 390, 2602–2604 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Gortmaker, S. L. et al. Changing the future of obesity: science, policy, and action. Lancet 378, 838–847 (2011).

  22. 22.

    Allender, S. et al. A community based systems diagram of obesity causes. PLoS ONE 10, e0129683 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Lal, A. et al. Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: a cost-effectiveness and equity analysis. PLoS Med. 14, e1002326 (2017).

  24. 24.

    Boles, R. E. G. T. M. V. S. M. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am. J. Public Health 89, 1322–1327 (1999).

  25. 25.

    World Cancer Research Fund International. Our policy framework to promote healthy diets & reduce obesity. World Cancer Research Fund International (2017).

  26. 26.

    World Health Organisation. Global database on the Implementation of Nutrition Action (GINA). WHO (2012).

  27. 27.

    Backholer, K., Blake, M. & Vandevijvere, S. Have we reached a tipping point for sugar-sweetened beverage taxes? Public Health Nutr. 19, 3057–3061 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Backholer, K., Blake, M. & Vandevijvere, S. Sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: an update on the year that was 2017. Public Health Nutr. 20, 3219–3224 (2017).

  29. 29.

    Purtle, J., Langellier, B. & Le-Scherban, F. A. Case study of the Philadelphia sugar-sweetened beverage tax policymaking process: implications for policy development and advocacy. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 24, 4–8 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Silver, L. D. et al. Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: a before-and-after study. PLoS Med. 14, e1002283 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Cawley, J., Willage, B. & Frisvold, D. Pass-through of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages at the Philadelphia international airport. JAMA. 319, 305–306 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Backholer, K. & Martin, J. Sugar-sweetened beverage tax: the inconvenient truths. Public Health Nutr. 20, 3225–3227 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Guerrero-Lopez, C. M., Molina, M. & Colchero, M. A. Employment changes associated with the introduction of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages and nonessential energy-dense food in Mexico. Prev. Med. 105, S43–S49 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Colchero, M. A., Rivera-Dommarco, J., Popkin, B. M. & Ng, S. W. In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Health Affairs 36, 564–571 (2017).

  35. 35.

    Briggs, A. D. et al. Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. BMJ 347, f6189 (2013).

  36. 36.

    Colchero, M. A. et al. Changes in prices after an excise tax to sweetened sugar beverages was implemented in Mexico: evidence from urban areas. PLoS ONE 10, e0144408 (2015).

  37. 37.

    Backholer, K. et al. The impact of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages according to socio-economic position: a systematic review of the evidence. Public Health Nutr. 19, 3070–3084 (2016).

  38. 38.

    NSW Government. Healthy food and drink in NSW health facilities for staff and visitors framework. NSW Government (2015).

  39. 39.

    NHS England. NHS England announces proposed action to cut sales of sugary drinks on NHS premises. NHS England (2016).

  40. 40.

    Western District Health Service. Sugary drink removal. WDHS (2017).

  41. 41.

    Miller, J., Lee, A., Obersky, N. & Edwards, R. Implementation of a better choice healthy food and drink supply strategy for staff and visitors in government-owned health facilities in Queensland, Australia. Public Health Nutr. 18, 1602–1609 (2015).

  42. 42.

    Peeters, A., Boelsen-Robinson, T. & Gilham, B. Going soft drink free in YMCA Victoria aquatic and recreation centres: policy evaluation. Global Obesity (2016).

  43. 43.

    Peeters, A. & Huse, O. City of Melbourne sports and recreation centre healthy food retail case study. VicHealth (2016).

  44. 44.

    Huse, O., Blake, M. R., Brooks, R., Corben, K. & Peeters, A. The effect on drink sales of removal of unhealthy drinks from display in a self-service cafe. Public Health Nutr. 19, 3142–3145 (2016).

  45. 45.

    Potvin Kent, M., Dubois, L. & Wanless, A. A nutritional comparison of foods and beverages marketed to children in two advertising policy environments. Obesity 20, 1829–1837 (2012).

  46. 46.

    Dhar, T. & Baylis, K. Fast-food consumption and the ban on advertising targeting children: the Quebec experience. J. Mark. Res. 48, 799–813 (2011).

  47. 47.

    Victoria State Government, Health and Human Services. Healthy choices: policy guidelines for hospitals and health services. Victoria State Government file:///C:/Users/smp8269/Downloads/Healthy%20Choices%20policy%20guidelines%20for%20hospitals%20and%20health%20services.pdf (2016).

  48. 48.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthier food retail: (HFR) action guide. CDC (2014).

  49. 49.

    Bray, G. A. et al. Obesity: a chronic relapsing progressive disease process. A position statement of the World Obesity Federation. Obes. Rev. 18, 715–723 (2017).

  50. 50.

    Huang, T. T. et al. Mobilisation of public support for policy actions to prevent obesity. Lancet 385, 2422–2431 (2015).

  51. 51.

    Swinburn, B., Gill, T. & Kumanyika, S. Obesity prevention: a proposed framework for translating evidence into action. Obes. Rev. 6, 23–33 (2005).

  52. 52.

    Sacks, G. et al. A proposed approach to monitor private-sector policies and practices related to food environments, obesity and non-communicable disease prevention. Obes. Rev. 14 (Suppl. 1), 38–48 (2013).

  53. 53.

    Brinsden, H. et al. Monitoring policy and actions on food environments: rationale and outline of the INFORMAS policy engagement and communication strategies. Obes. Rev. 14 (Suppl. 1), 13–23 (2013).

  54. 54.

    Swinburn, B. et al. INFORMAS (International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support): overview and key principles. Obes. Rev. 14 (Suppl. 1), 1–12 (2013).

  55. 55.

    Ni Mhurchu, C. et al. Monitoring the availability of healthy and unhealthy foods and non-alcoholic beverages in community and consumer retail food environments globally. Obes. Rev. 14 (Suppl. 1), 108–119 (2013).

  56. 56.

    Brimblecombe, J., Liddle, R. & O’Dea, K. Use of point-of-sale data to assess food and nutrient quality in remote stores. Public Health Nutr. 16, 1159–1167 (2013).

  57. 57.

    Fleischhacker, S. E., Evenson, K. R., Sharkey, J., Pitts, S. B. & Rodriguez, D. A. Validity of secondary retail food outlet data: a systematic review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 45, 462–473 (2013).

  58. 58.

    Brimblecombe, J., Mackerras, D., Clifford, P. & O’Dea, K. Does the store-turnover method still provide a useful guide to food intakes in aboriginal communities? Aust. N. Z. J. Public. Health 30, 444–447 (2006).

  59. 59.

    Craig, P., Katikireddi, S. V., Leyland, A. & Popham, F. Natural Experiments: an overview of methods, approaches, and contributions to public health intervention research. Annu. Rev. Public Health 38, 39–56 (2017).

  60. 60.

    Allender, S. et al. Whole of systems trial of prevention strategies for childhood obesity: WHO STOPS Childhood Obesity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13, 1143 (2016).

  61. 61.

    Swinburn, B., Dietz, W. & Kleinert, S. A. Lancet commission on obesity. Lancet 386, 1716–1717 (2015).

  62. 62.

    Brimblecombe, J. et al. Factors influencing food choice in an Australian aboriginal community. Qual. Health Res. 24, 387–400 (2014).

  63. 63.

    Mah, C. L., Cook, B., Rideout, K. & Minaker, L. M. Policy options for healthier retail food environments in city-regions. Can. J. Public Health 107, 5343 (2016).

  64. 64.

    Blake, M. R. et al. Retailer-led sugar-sweetened beverage price increase reduces purchases in a hospital convenience store in Melbourne, Australia: a mixed methods evaluation. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet (2017).

  65. 65.

    World Health Organization. Report of the commission on ending childhood obesity. WHO (2016).

Download references


The author acknowledges her appreciation of thoughtful feedback on this piece from K. Backholer, A. Cameron, M. Blake and T. Boelsen-Robinson.

Author information


  1. Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia

    • Anna Peeters


  1. Search for Anna Peeters in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Peeters.


Food environments

The places where citizens purchase and/or consume food, which represent a range of settings that influence individual food choices.

Healthy food policies

Policies that affect the likelihood of a population purchasing and consuming more healthy food than unhealthy food.

Systems perspective

A perspective that considers the purchase and consumption of food as a consequence of an integrated system of multiple inter-related and interdependent parts.

Unhealthy dietary factors

Individual elements of characteristics of diet, such as types of foods or nutrients. Dietary factors associated with increased health risk include low fruit and vegetable intake and high salt, fat and sugar intake.

About this article

Publication history



Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.