Less than a decade ago, it was shown that bromodomains, acetyl lysine ‘reader’ modules found in proteins with varied functions, were highly tractable small-molecule targets. This is an unusual property for protein–protein or protein–peptide interaction domains, and it prompted a wave of chemical probe discovery to understand the biological potential of new agents that targeted bromodomains. The original examples, inhibitors of the bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) class of bromodomains, showed enticing anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities, and several compounds have since advanced to human clinical trials. Here, we review the current state of BET inhibitor biology in relation to clinical development, and we discuss the next wave of bromodomain inhibitors with clinical potential in oncology and non-oncology indications. The lessons learned from BET inhibitor programmes should affect efforts to develop drugs that target non-BET bromodomains and other epigenetic readers.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $22.08 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Filippakopoulos, P. et al. Histone recognition and large-scale structural analysis of the human bromodomain family. Cell 149, 214–231 (2012). This now-classic review of the BD protein family is an essential introduction for those new to the field.
Vollmuth, F. & Geyer, M. Interaction of propionylated and butyrylated histone H3 lysine marks with Brd4 bromodomains. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6768–6772 (2010).
Hewings, D. S. et al. Progress in the development and application of small molecule inhibitors of bromodomain-acetyl-lysine interactions. J. Med. Chem. 55, 9393–9413 (2012).
Huang, D., Rossini, E., Steiner, S. & Caflisch, A. Structured water molecules in the binding site of bromodomains can be displaced by cosolvent. ChemMedChem 9, 573–579 (2014).
Flynn, E. M. et al. A subset of human bromodomains recognizes butyryllysine and crotonyllysine histone peptide modifications. Structure 23, 1801–1814 (2015).
Fedorov, O. et al. Selective targeting of the BRG/PB1 bromodomains impairs embryonic and trophoblast stem cell maintenance. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500723 (2015).
Crawford, T. D. et al. Diving into the water: inducible binding conformations for BRD4, TAF1(2), BRD9, and CECR2 bromodomains. J. Med. Chem. 59, 5391–5402 (2016).
Liu, J. et al. The polar warhead of a TRIM24 bromodomain inhibitor rearranges a water-mediated interaction network. FEBS J. 284, 1082–1095 (2017).
Aldeghi, M. et al. Large-scale analysis of water stability in bromodomain binding pockets with grand canonical Monte Carlo. Commun. Chem. 1, 19 (2018).
Shadrick, W. R. et al. Exploiting a water network to achieve enthalpy-driven, bromodomain-selective BET inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 26, 25–36 (2018).
Harner, M. J., Chauder, B. A., Phan, J. & Fesik, S. W. Fragment-based screening of the bromodomain of ATAD2. J. Med. Chem. 57, 9687–9692 (2014).
Zhang, X., Chen, K., Wu, Y. D. & Wiest, O. Protein dynamics and structural waters in bromodomains. PLOS ONE 12, e0186570 (2017).
Jennings, L. E., Measures, A. R., Wilson, B. G. & Conway, S. J. Phenotypic screening and fragment-based approaches to the discovery of small-molecule bromodomain ligands. Future Med. Chem. 6, 179–204 (2014).
Arrowsmith, C. H., Bountra, C., Fish, P. V., Lee, K. & Schapira, M. Epigenetic protein families: a new frontier for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11, 384–400 (2012).
Filippakopoulos, P. & Knapp, S. Targeting bromodomains: epigenetic readers of lysine acetylation. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 13, 337–356 (2014).
Sanchez, R., Meslamani, J. & Zhou, M. M. The bromodomain: from epigenome reader to druggable target. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1839, 676–685 (2014).
Ferri, E., Petosa, C. & McKenna, C. E. Bromodomains: structure, function and pharmacology of inhibition. Biochem. Pharmacol. 106, 1–18 (2016).
Shi, J. & Vakoc, C. R. The mechanisms behind the therapeutic activity of BET bromodomain inhibition. Mol. Cell 54, 728–736 (2014).
Xu, Y. & Vakoc, C. R. Targeting cancer cells with BET bromodomain inhibitors. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 7, a026674 (2017).
Brand, M. et al. Small molecule inhibitors of bromodomain-acetyl-lysine interactions. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 22–39 (2015).
Romero, F. A. et al. Disrupting acetyl-lysine recognition: progress in the development of bromodomain inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 59, 1271–1298 (2016).
Theodoulou, N. H., Tomkinson, N. C., Prinjha, R. K. & Humphreys, P. G. Clinical progress and pharmacology of small molecule bromodomain inhibitors. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 33, 58–66 (2016).
Clegg, M. A., Tomkinson, N. C. O., Prinjha, R. K. & Humphreys, P. G. Advancements in the development of non-BET bromodomain chemical probes. ChemMedChem 14, 362–385 (2019). This review is a comprehensive update of the 2016 ChemMedChem review from the same group.
Liu, Z. et al. Drug discovery targeting bromodomain-containing protein 4. J. Med. Chem. 60, 4533–4558 (2017).
Perez-Salvia, M. & Esteller, M. Bromodomain inhibitors and cancer therapy: From structures to applications. Epigenetics 12, 323–339 (2017).
Marchand, J. R. & Caflisch, A. Binding mode of acetylated histones to bromodomains: variations on a common motif. ChemMedChem 10, 1327–1333 (2015).
Lloyd, J. T. & Glass, K. C. Biological function and histone recognition of family IV bromodomain-containing proteins. J. Cell. Physiol. 233, 1877–1886 (2018).
Wu, Q. et al. A chemical toolbox for the study of bromodomains and epigenetic signaling. Nat. Commun. 10, 1915 (2019).
Fujisawa, T. & Filippakopoulos, P. Functions of bromodomain-containing proteins and their roles in homeostasis and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 246–262 (2017). This review surveys known biochemical functions of BD-containing proteins, including incorporation into multi-protein complexes and the presence of additional functional domains. In addition, it provides information curated from cancer sequencing databases (for example, The Cancer Genome Atlas) on genomic alterations found in BD proteins (translocations, mutations and expression changes), and they map onto structures those point mutations that occur in the BDs themselves, providing insight into whether the mutations are likely to alter BD function.
Tough, D. F., Tak, P. P., Tarakhovsky, A. & Prinjha, R. K. Epigenetic drug discovery: breaking through the immune barrier. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15, 835–853 (2016).
Jain, A. K. & Barton, M. C. Bromodomain histone readers and cancer. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 2003–2010 (2017).
Pfister, S. X. & Ashworth, A. Marked for death: targeting epigenetic changes in cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 241–263 (2017).
Shortt, J., Ott, C. J., Johnstone, R. W. & Bradner, J. E. A chemical probe toolbox for dissecting the cancer epigenome. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 160–183 (2017).
Gacias, M. et al. Selective chemical modulation of gene transcription favors oligodendrocyte lineage progression. Chem. Biol. 21, 841–854 (2014).
Raux, B. et al. Exploring selective inhibition of the first bromodomain of the human bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) proteins. J. Med. Chem. 59, 1634–1641 (2016).
Cheung, K. et al. BET N-terminal bromodomain inhibition selectively blocks Th17 cell differentiation and ameliorates colitis in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2952–2957 (2017).
Jahagirdar, R. et al. RVX-297, a BET bromodomain inhibitor, has therapeutic effects in preclinical models of acute inflammation and autoimmune disease. Mol. Pharmacol. 92, 694–706 (2017).
Odore, E. et al. Phase I population pharmacokinetic assessment of the oral bromodomain inhibitor OTX015 in patients with haematologic malignancies. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 55, 397–405 (2016).
Amorim, S. et al. Bromodomain inhibitor OTX015 in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma: a dose-escalation, open-label, pharmacokinetic, phase 1 study. Lancet Haematol. 3, e196–e204 (2016).
Berthon, C. et al. Bromodomain inhibitor OTX015 in patients with acute leukaemia: a dose-escalation, phase 1 study. Lancet Haematol. 3, e186–e195 (2016).
Massard, C. et al. A phase Ib trial with MK-8628/OTX015, a small molecule inhibitor of bromodomain (BRD) and extra-terminal (BET). proteins, in patients with selected advanced solid tumors. Eur. J. Cancer 69 (Suppl. 1), S2–S3 (2016).
Abramson, J. S. et al. BET inhibitor CPI-0610 is well tolerated and induces responses in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma: preliminary analysis of an ongoing phase 1 study. Blood 126, 1491 (2015).
O’Dwyer, P. J. et al. GSK525762, a selective bromodomain (BRD) and extra terminal protein (BET) inhibitor: results from part 1 of a phase I/II open-label single-agent study in patients with NUT midline carcinoma (NMC) and other cancers [abstract]. Cancer Res. 76 (Suppl. 14), CT014 (2016).
Mottamal, M., Zheng, S., Huang, T. L. & Wang, G. Histone deacetylase inhibitors in clinical studies as templates for new anticancer agents. Molecules 20, 3898–3941 (2015).
Kuter, D. J. Managing thrombocytopenia associated with cancer chemotherapy. Oncology 29, 282–294 (2015).
Postel-Vinay, S. et al. First-in-human phase I study of the bromodomain and extraterminal motif inhibitor BAY 1238097: emerging pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship and early termination due to unexpected toxicity. Eur. J. Cancer 109, 103–110 (2019).
Kati, W. ABBV-744: a first-in-class highly BDII-selective BET bromodomain inhibitor [abstract]. Cancer Res. 78 (Suppl. 13), DDT01-05 (2018).
Tanaka, M. et al. Design and characterization of bivalent BET inhibitors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 1089–1096 (2016).
Waring, M. J. et al. Potent and selective bivalent inhibitors of BET bromodomains. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 1097–1104 (2016).
Ren, C. et al. Spatially constrained tandem bromodomain inhibition bolsters sustained repression of BRD4 transcriptional activity for TNBC cell growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7949–7954 (2018).
Rhyasen, G. W. et al. AZD5153: a novel bivalent BET bromodomain inhibitor highly active against hematologic malignancies. Mol. Cancer Ther. 15, 2563–2574 (2016).
French, C. NUT midline carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Cancer 14, 149–150 (2014).
Stathis, A. et al. Clinical response of carcinomas harboring the BRD4-NUT oncoprotein to the targeted bromodomain inhibitor OTX015/MK-8628. Cancer Discov. 6, 492–500 (2016).
Duan, Q. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition suppresses innate inflammatory and profibrotic transcriptional networks in heart failure. Sci. Transl Med. 9, eaah5084 (2017).
Nicholls, S. J. et al. Selective BET protein inhibition with apabetalone and cardiovascular events: a pooled analysis of trials in patients with coronary artery disease. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs 18, 109–115 (2018).
Gilham, D. et al. RVX-208, a BET-inhibitor for treating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, raises ApoA-I/HDL and represses pathways that contribute to cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis 247, 48–57 (2016).
Siebel, A. L. et al. Effects of the BET-inhibitor, RVX-208 on the HDL lipidome and glucose metabolism in individuals with prediabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Metabolism 65, 904–914 (2016).
Ghosh, G. C., Bhadra, R., Ghosh, R. K., Banerjee, K. & Gupta, A. RVX 208: a novel BET protein inhibitor, role as an inducer of apo A-I/HDL and beyond. Cardiovasc. Ther. 35, e12265 (2017).
Wasiak, S. et al. Downregulation of the complement cascade in vitro, in mice and in patients with cardiovascular disease by the BET protein inhibitor apabetalone (RVX-208). J. Cardiovasc. Transl Res. 10, 337–347 (2017).
Mirguet, O. et al. From ApoA1 upregulation to BET family bromodomain inhibition: discovery of I-BET151. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22, 2963–2967 (2012).
Kempen, H. J. et al. Stimulation of hepatic apolipoprotein A-I production by novel thieno-triazolodiazepines: roles of the classical benzodiazepine receptor, PAF receptor, and bromodomain binding. Lipid Insights 6, 47–54 (2013).
Gosmini, R. et al. The discovery of I-BET726 (GSK1324726A), a potent tetrahydroquinoline ApoA1 up-regulator and selective BET bromodomain inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 57, 8111–8131 (2014).
Picaud, S. et al. RVX-208, an inhibitor of BET transcriptional regulators with selectivity for the second bromodomain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19754–19759 (2013). This article is the first to provide a clear explanation of why RVX-208 showed a different pharmacology from other BETis. The authors show the selectivity of the inhibitor for BD2 and demonstrate the mild transcriptional effects resulting from BD2 inhibition as compared with pan-BET, BD1 and BD2 inhibition.
Wasiak, S. et al. Data on gene and protein expression changes induced by apabetalone (RVX-208) in ex vivo treated human whole blood and primary hepatocytes. Data Brief 8, 1280–1288 (2016).
Boehm, D. et al. BET bromodomain-targeting compounds reactivate HIV from latency via a Tat-independent mechanism. Cell Cycle 12, 452–462 (2013).
Li, Z., Guo, J., Wu, Y. & Zhou, Q. The BET bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 activates HIV latency through antagonizing Brd4 inhibition of Tat-transactivation. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 277–287 (2013). This article and the one preceding it are the first articles to show that BETi may have a therapeutic impact on HIV infection, even if the relationship of BRD4 with HIV Tat and P-TEFb had been known for several years.
Lu, P. et al. The BET inhibitor OTX015 reactivates latent HIV-1 through P-TEFb. Sci. Rep. 6, 24100 (2016).
Keck, K. M. et al. BET inhibitors block the Epstein-Barr virus lytic cycle at two distinct steps. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 13284–13295 (2017).
Mietton, F. et al. Selective BET bromodomain inhibition as an antifungal therapeutic strategy. Nat. Commun. 8, 15482 (2017). This report is the first of the generation of in vitro active, fungal-selective BDis for the elimination of a human pathogen. The authors describe a chemical starting point for future exploration of a potent anti-fungal agent with limited human toxicity in infection models.
Schulz, D. et al. Bromodomain proteins contribute to maintenance of bloodstream form stage identity in the African trypanosome. PLOS Biol. 13, e1002316 (2015).
Drouin, L. et al. Structure enabled design of BAZ2-ICR, a chemical probe targeting the bromodomains of BAZ2A and BAZ2B. J. Med. Chem. 58, 2553–2559 (2015).
Chen, P. et al. Discovery and characterization of GSK2801, a selective chemical probe for the bromodomains BAZ2A and BAZ2B. J. Med. Chem. 59, 1410–1424 (2016).
Humphreys, P. G. et al. Discovery of a potent, cell penetrant, and selective p300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF)/general control nonderepressible 5 (GCN5) bromodomain chemical probe. J. Med. Chem. 60, 695–709 (2017).
Moustakim, M. et al. Discovery of a PCAF bromodomain chemical probe. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 827–831 (2017).
Crawford, T. D. et al. GNE-886: a potent and selective inhibitor of the cat eye syndrome chromosome region candidate 2 bromodomain (CECR2). ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 737–741 (2017).
Attar, N. & Kurdistani, S. K. Exploitation of EP3000 and CREBBP lysine acetyltransferases by cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 7, a026534 (2017).
Sachchidanand et al. Target structure-based discovery of small molecules that block human p53 and CREB binding protein association. Chem. Biol. 13, 81–90 (2006).
Borah, J. C. et al. A small molecule binding to the coactivator CREB-binding protein blocks apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. Chem. Biol. 18, 531–541 (2011).
Hay, D. A. et al. Discovery and optimization of small-molecule ligands for the CBP/p300 bromodomains. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9308–9319 (2014).
Chekler, E. L. et al. Transcriptional profiling of a selective CREB binding protein bromodomain inhibitor highlights therapeutic opportunities. Chem. Biol. 22, 1588–1596 (2015).
Picaud, S. et al. Generation of a selective small molecule inhibitor of the CBP/p300 bromodomain for leukemia therapy. Cancer Res. 75, 5106–5119 (2015).
Abruzzese, M. P. et al. Inhibition of bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins increases NKG2D ligand MICA expression and sensitivity to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma cells: role of cMYC-IRF4-miR-125b interplay. J. Hematol. Oncol. 9, 134 (2016).
Conery, A. R. et al. Bromodomain inhibition of the transcriptional coactivators CBP/EP300 as a therapeutic strategy to target the IRF4 network in multiple myeloma. eLife 5, e10483 (2016). This article describes a CREBBP-dependent and EP300-dependent transcriptional programme, identified by chemical biology approaches, that converges on MYC but is distinct from a BET-driven transcriptional programme. This article not only highlights IRF4 as a potential biomarker for future development of CREBBP and EP300 inhibitors in myeloma but also points to the possibility of combined inhibition of BET, CREBBP and EP300 BDs as a therapeutic strategy.
Hammitzsch, A. et al. CBP30, a selective CBP/p300 bromodomain inhibitor, suppresses human Th17 responses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10768–10773 (2015).
Mele, D. A. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition suppresses TH17-mediated pathology. J. Exp. Med. 210, 2181–2190 (2013). This article and that of Hammitzsch et al. (2015) suggest that, similar to the MYC programme, the T H 17 transcriptional programme is regulated by both CREBBP–EP300 and BET BDs. Whether inhibition of a single node or both nodes will have better efficacy or therapeutic index in autoimmune disorders remains to be tested.
Ebrahimi, A. et al. Bromodomain inhibition of the coactivators CBP/EP300 facilitate cellular reprogramming. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 519–528 (2019).
Olzscha, H., Fedorov, O., Kessler, B. M., Knapp, S. & La Thangue, N. B. CBP/p300 bromodomains regulate amyloid-like protein aggregation upon aberrant lysine acetylation. Cell Chem. Biol. 24, 9–23 (2017).
Taylor, A. M. et al. Fragment-based discovery of a selective and cell-active benzodiazepinone CBP/EP300 bromodomain inhibitor (CPI-637). ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 7, 531–536 (2016).
Ghosh, S. et al. Regulatory T cell modulation by CBP/EP300 bromodomain inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 13014–13027 (2016).
Crawford, T. D. et al. Discovery of a potent and selective in vivo probe (GNE-272) for the bromodomains of CBP/EP300. J. Med. Chem. 59, 10549–10563 (2016).
Jin, L. et al. Therapeutic targeting of the CBP/p300 bromodomain blocks the growth of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 77, 5564–5575 (2017). This article is the first to demonstrate the feasibility of generating a molecule that is highly selective for CREBBP and EP300 BDs relative to BET BDs through structure-based optimization starting with the molecule described in Crawford et al. (2016). The inhibitor served as a starting point for the highly optimized molecule described in Romero et al. (2017).
Raisner, R. et al. Enhancer activity requires CBP/P300 bromodomain-dependent histone H3K27 acetylation. Cell Rep. 24, 1722–1729 (2018).
Romero, F. A. et al. GNE-781, a highly advanced potent and selective bromodomain inhibitor of cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein, binding protein (CBP). J. Med. Chem. 60, 9162–9183 (2017).
Pegg, N. A., Taddei, D. M. A., Brown, R. & Keen, C. M. Isoxazolyl substituted imidazopyridines. WO2016170323 (2016).
Pegg, N. et al. Characterisation of CCS1477: a novel small molecule inhibitor of p300/CBP for the treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer [abstract]. J. Clin. Oncol. 35 (Suppl. 15), 11590 (2017).
Kadoch, C. & Crabtree, G. R. Mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes and cancer: mechanistic insights gained from human genomics. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500447 (2015).
Kadoch, C. et al. Proteomic and bioinformatic analysis of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes identifies extensive roles in human malignancy. Nat. Genet. 45, 592–601 (2013).
Wang, X., Haswell, J. R. & Roberts, C. W. Molecular pathways: SWI/SNF (BAF) complexes are frequently mutated in cancer—mechanisms and potential therapeutic insights. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 21–27 (2014).
Oike, T. et al. A synthetic lethality-based strategy to treat cancers harboring a genetic deficiency in the chromatin remodeling factor BRG1. Cancer Res. 73, 5508–5518 (2013).
Hoffman, G. R. et al. Functional epigenetics approach identifies BRM/SMARCA2 as a critical synthetic lethal target in BRG1-deficient cancers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3128–3133 (2014).
Kaelin, W. G. Jr The concept of synthetic lethality in the context of anticancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 689–698 (2005).
Wang, X. et al. Oncogenesis caused by loss of the SNF5 tumor suppressor is dependent on activity of BRG1, the ATPase of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Cancer Res. 69, 8094–8101 (2009).
Helming, K. C. et al. ARID1B is a specific vulnerability in ARID1A-mutant cancers. Nat. Med. 20, 251–254 (2014).
Lissanu Deribe, Y. et al. Mutations in the SWI/SNF complex induce a targetable dependence on oxidative phosphorylation in lung cancer. Nat. Med. 24, 1047–1057 (2018).
Molina, J. R. et al. An inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation exploits cancer vulnerability. Nat. Med. 24, 1036–1046 (2018).
Vangamudi, B. et al. The SMARCA2/4 ATPase domain surpasses the bromodomain as a drug target in SWI/SNF-mutant cancers: insights from cDNA rescue and PFI-3 inhibitor studies. Cancer Res. 75, 3865–3878 (2015). This important study invalidates the BRM BD as a therapeutic target in BRG1-mutant cancers.
Papillon, J. P. N. et al. Discovery of orally active inhibitors of Brahma homolog (BRM)/SMARCA2 ATPase activity for the treatment of Brahma related gene 1 (BRG1)/SMARCA4-mutant cancers. J. Med. Chem. 61, 10155–10172 (2018).
Farnaby, W. et al. BAF complex vulnerabilities in cancer demonstrated via structure-based PROTAC design. Nat. Chem. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-019-0294-6 (2019).
Gerstenberger, B. S. et al. Identification of a chemical probe for family VIII bromodomains through optimization of a fragment hit. J. Med. Chem. 59, 4800–4811 (2016).
Sutherell, C. L. et al. Identification and development of 2,3-dihydropyrrolo[1,2-a]quinazolin-5(1H)-one inhibitors targeting bromodomains within the switch/sucrose nonfermenting complex. J. Med. Chem. 59, 5095–5101 (2016).
Albrecht, B. K. et al. Therapeutic pyridazine compounds and uses thereof. WO2016138114A1 (2016).
Morrison, E. A. et al. DNA binding drives the association of BRG1/hBRM bromodomains with nucleosomes. Nat. Commun. 8, 16080 (2017).
Miller, T. C. et al. A bromodomain-DNA interaction facilitates acetylation-dependent bivalent nucleosome recognition by the BET protein BRDT. Nat. Commun. 7, 13855 (2016).
Porter, E. G. & Dykhuizen, E. C. Individual bromodomains of polybromo-1 contribute to chromatin association and tumor suppression in clear cell renal carcinoma. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 2601–2610 (2017).
Oppikofer, M. et al. Non-canonical reader modules of BAZ1A promote recovery from DNA damage. Nat. Commun. 8, 862 (2017).
Mashtalir, N. et al. Modular organization and assembly of SWI/SNF family chromatin remodeling complexes. Cell 175, 1272–1288 (2018).
Picaud, S. et al. 9H-purine scaffold reveals induced-fit pocket plasticity of the BRD9 bromodomain. J. Med. Chem. 58, 2718–2736 (2015).
Clark, P. G. et al. LP99: discovery and synthesis of the first selective BRD7/9 bromodomain inhibitor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 6217–6221 (2015).
Theodoulou, N. H. et al. Discovery of I-BRD9, a selective cell active chemical probe for bromodomain containing protein 9 inhibition. J. Med. Chem. 59, 1425–1439 (2016).
Hay, D. A. et al. Design and synthesis of potent and selective inhibitors of BRD7 and BRD9 bromodomains. Med. Chem. Commun. 6, 1381–1386 (2015).
Martin, L. J. et al. Structure-based design of an in vivo active selective BRD9 inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 59, 4462–4475 (2016).
Crawford, T. D. et al. Inhibition of bromodomain-containing protein 9 for the prevention of epigenetically-defined drug resistance. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 27, 3534–3541 (2017).
Karim, R. M. & Schonbrunn, E. An advanced tool to interrogate BRD9. J. Med. Chem. 59, 4459–4461 (2016).
Hohmann, A. F. et al. Sensitivity and engineered resistance of myeloid leukemia cells to BRD9 inhibition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 672–679 (2016). This exceptionally thorough study investigates the biological role of BRD9. The authors make use of BD chimeric proteins and chemical probes to differentiate the function of the BRD9 BD from the closely related BRD7 BD and from BET-class BD proteins.
Sharma, S. V. et al. A chromatin-mediated reversible drug-tolerant state in cancer cell subpopulations. Cell 141, 69–80 (2010).
Remillard, D. et al. Degradation of the BAF complex factor BRD9 by heterobifunctional ligands. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 5738–5743 (2017).
Zoppi, V. et al. Iterative design and optimization of initially inactive proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) identify VZ185 as a potent, fast, and selective von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) based dual degrader probe of BRD9 and BRD7. J. Med. Chem. 62, 699–726 (2019).
Michel, B. C. et al. A non-canonical SWI/SNF complex is a synthetic lethal target in cancers driven by BAF complex perturbation. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 1410–1420 (2018).
Albright, S. R. & Tjian, R. TAFs revisited: more data reveal new twists and confirm old ideas. Gene 242, 1–13 (2000).
Nogales, E., Louder, R. K. & He, Y. Structural insights into the eukaryotic transcription initiation machinery. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 46, 59–83 (2017).
Jacobson, R. H., Ladurner, A. G., King, D. S. & Tjian, R. Structure and function of a human TAFII250 double bromodomain module. Science 288, 1422–1425 (2000).
Bouche, L. et al. Benzoisoquinolinediones as potent and selective inhibitors of BRPF2 and TAF1/TAF1L bromodomains. J. Med. Chem. 60, 4002–4022 (2017).
Wang, S. et al. GNE-371, a potent and selective chemical probe for the second bromodomains of human transcription-initiation-factor TFIID subunit 1 and transcription-initiation-factor TFIID subunit 1-like. J. Med. Chem. 61, 9301–9315 (2018).
Sdelci, S. et al. Mapping the chemical chromatin reactivation landscape identifies BRD4-TAF1 cross-talk. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 504–510 (2016).
Suh, J. L. et al. Quantitative characterization of bivalent probes for a dual bromodomain protein, transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 1. Biochemistry 57, 2140–2149 (2018).
Klein, B. J., Lalonde, M. E., Cote, J., Yang, X. J. & Kutateladze, T. G. Crosstalk between epigenetic readers regulates the MOZ/MORF HAT complexes. Epigenetics 9, 186–193 (2014).
Yang, X. J. MOZ and MORF acetyltransferases: molecular interaction, animal development and human disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1853, 1818–1826 (2015).
Demont, E. H. et al. 1,3-dimethyl benzimidazolones are potent, selective inhibitors of the BRPF1 bromodomain. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 5, 1190–1195 (2014).
Bamborough, P. et al. GSK6853, a chemical probe for inhibition of the BRPF1 bromodomain. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 7, 552–557 (2016).
Igoe, N. et al. Design of a biased potent small molecule inhibitor of the bromodomain and PHD finger-containing (BRPF) proteins suitable for cellular and in vivo studies. J. Med. Chem. 60, 668–680 (2017).
Igoe, N. et al. Design of a chemical probe for the bromodomain and plant homeodomain finger-containing (BRPF) family of proteins. J. Med. Chem. 60, 6998–7011 (2017).
Meier, J. C. et al. Selective targeting of bromodomains of the bromodomain-PHD fingers family impairs osteoclast differentiation. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 2619–2630 (2017).
Palmer, W. S. et al. Structure-guided design of IACS-9571, a selective high-affinity dual TRIM24-BRPF1 bromodomain inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 59, 1440–1454 (2016).
Bennett, J. et al. Discovery of a chemical tool inhibitor targeting the bromodomains of TRIM24 and BRPF. J. Med. Chem. 59, 1642–1647 (2016).
Hsia, E. Y., Zou, J. X. & Chen, H. W. The roles and action mechanisms of p160/SRC coactivators and the ANCCA coregulator in cancer. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl Sci. 87, 261–298 (2009).
Boussouar, F., Jamshidikia, M., Morozumi, Y., Rousseaux, S. & Khochbin, S. Malignant genome reprogramming by ATAD2. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1829, 1010–1014 (2013).
Cattaneo, M. et al. Lessons from yeast on emerging roles of the ATAD2 protein family in gene regulation and genome organization. Mol. Cells 37, 851–856 (2014).
Vidler, L. R., Brown, N., Knapp, S. & Hoelder, S. Druggability analysis and structural classification of bromodomain acetyl-lysine binding sites. J. Med. Chem. 55, 7346–7359 (2012).
Demont, E. H. et al. Fragment-based discovery of low-micromolar ATAD2 bromodomain inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 58, 5649–5673 (2015).
Bamborough, P. et al. Structure-based optimization of naphthyridones into potent ATAD2 bromodomain inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 58, 6151–6178 (2015).
Bamborough, P. et al. A chemical probe for the ATAD2 bromodomain. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 11382–11386 (2016).
Fernandez-Montalvan, A. E. et al. Isoform-selective ATAD2 chemical probe with novel chemical structure and unusual mode of action. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 2730–2736 (2017).
Martin, M. P., Olesen, S. H., Georg, G. I. & Schonbrunn, E. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor dinaciclib interacts with the acetyl-lysine recognition site of bromodomains. ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 2360–2365 (2013).
Dittmann, A. et al. The commonly used PI3-kinase probe LY294002 is an inhibitor of BET bromodomains. ACS Chem. Biol. 9, 495–502 (2014).
Arrowsmith, C. H. et al. The promise and peril of chemical probes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 536–541 (2015). This must-read review for researchers uses chemical probes to explore new biology.
Mahadevan, D. et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the pan-PI3K/mTORC vascular targeted pro-drug SF1126 in patients with advanced solid tumours and B cell malignancies. Eur. J. Cancer 48, 3319–3327 (2012).
Singh, A. R. et al. Single agent and synergistic activity of the “first-in-class” dual PI3K/BRD4 inhibitor SF1126 with sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 15, 2553–2562 (2016).
Ciceri, P. et al. Dual kinase-bromodomain inhibitors for rationally designed polypharmacology. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 305–312 (2014).
Ember, S. W. et al. Acetyl-lysine binding site of bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) interacts with diverse kinase inhibitors. ACS Chem. Biol. 9, 1160–1171 (2014). This study and that of Ciceri et al. (2014) reveal that many advanced preclinical (or even clinically used) kinase inhibitors have significant affinity for BDs, calling into question whether BD inhibition might contribute to the biological activities of these kinase inhibitors and suggesting the possibility of optimizing inhibitors for dual activity.
Allen, B. K. et al. Large-scale computational screening identifies first in class multitarget inhibitor of EGFR kinase and BRD4. Sci. Rep. 5, 16924 (2015).
Chen, L. et al. BRD4 structure-activity relationships of dual PLK1 kinase/BRD4 bromodomain inhibitor BI-2536. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 6, 764–769 (2015).
Carlino, L. & Rastelli, G. Dual kinase-bromodomain inhibitors in anticancer drug discovery: a structural and pharmacological perspective. J. Med. Chem. 59, 9305–9320 (2016).
Liu, S. et al. Structure-guided design and development of potent and selective dual bromodomain 4 (BRD4)/polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 61, 7785–7795 (2018).
Peters, J. U. Polypharmacology - foe or friend? J. Med. Chem. 56, 8955–8971 (2013).
Fiskus, W. et al. BET protein antagonist JQ1 is synergistically lethal with FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and overcomes resistance to FLT3-TKI in AML cells expressing FLT-ITD. Mol. Cancer Ther. 13, 2315–2327 (2014).
Ember, S. W. et al. Potent dual BET bromodomain-kinase inhibitors as value-added multitargeted chemical probes and cancer therapeutics. Mol. Cancer Ther. 16, 1054–1067 (2017).
Bondeson, D. P. & Crews, C. M. Targeted protein degradation by small molecules. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 57, 107–123 (2017).
Cromm, P. M. & Crews, C. M. Targeted protein degradation: from chemical biology to drug discovery. Cell Chem. Biol. 24, 1181–1190 (2017).
Lai, A. C. & Crews, C. M. Induced protein degradation: an emerging drug discovery paradigm. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 101–114 (2017).
Lucas, X. & Ciulli, A. Recognition of substrate degrons by E3 ubiquitin ligases and modulation by small-molecule mimicry strategies. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 44, 101–110 (2017).
Neklesa, T. K., Winkler, J. D. & Crews, C. M. Targeted protein degradation by PROTACs. Pharmacol. Ther. 174, 138–144 (2017).
Ottis, P. & Crews, C. M. Proteolysis-targeting chimeras: induced protein degradation as a therapeutic strategy. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 892–898 (2017).
Raina, K. & Crews, C. M. Targeted protein knockdown using small molecule degraders. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 39, 46–53 (2017).
Winter, G. E. et al. Phthalimide conjugation as a strategy for in vivo target protein degradation. Science 348, 1376–1381 (2015).
Zengerle, M., Chan, K. H. & Ciulli, A. Selective small molecule induced degradation of the BET bromodomain protein BRD4. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 1770–1777 (2015).
Lu, J. et al. Hijacking the E3 ubiquitin ligase cereblon to efficiently target BRD4. Chem. Biol. 22, 755–763 (2015). This paper and those of Winter et al. (2015) and Zengerle et al. (2015) describe the first examples of PROTACs targeting BRD4.
Robb, C. M. et al. Chemically induced degradation of CDK9 by a proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC). Chem. Commun. 53, 7577–7580 (2017).
Raina, K. et al. PROTAC-induced BET protein degradation as a therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7124–7129 (2016).
Saenz, D. T. et al. Novel BET protein proteolysis-targeting chimera exerts superior lethal activity than bromodomain inhibitor (BETi) against post-myeloproliferative neoplasm secondary (s) AML cells. Leukemia 9, 1951–1961 (2017).
Sun, B. et al. BET protein proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) exerts potent lethal activity against mantle cell lymphoma cells. Leukemia 32, 343–352 (2018).
Ran, X. et al. Structure-based design of gamma-carboline analogues as potent and specific BET bromodomain inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 58, 4927–4939 (2015).
Zhou, B. et al. Discovery of a small-molecule degrader of bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins with picomolar cellular potencies and capable of achieving tumor regression. J. Med. Chem. 61, 462–481 (2018).
Bai, L. et al. Targeted degradation of BET proteins in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 77, 2476–2487 (2017).
Qin, C. et al. Discovery of QCA570 as an exceptionally potent and efficacious proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) degrader of the bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins capable of inducing complete and durable tumor regression. J. Med. Chem. 61, 6685–6704 (2018).
Wurz, R. P. et al. A “click chemistry platform” for the rapid synthesis of bispecific molecules for inducing protein degradation. J. Med. Chem. 61, 453–461 (2018).
Lebraud, H., Wright, D. J., Johnson, C. N. & Heightman, T. D. Protein degradation by in-cell self-assembly of proteolysis targeting chimeras. ACS Cent. Sci. 2, 927–934 (2016).
Chan, K. H., Zengerle, M., Testa, A. & Ciulli, A. Impact of target warhead and linkage vector on inducing protein degradation: comparison of bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) degraders derived from triazolodiazepine (JQ1) and tetrahydroquinoline (I-BET726) BET inhibitor scaffolds. J. Med. Chem. 61, 504–513 (2018).
Gadd, M. S. et al. Structural basis of PROTAC cooperative recognition for selective protein degradation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 514–521 (2017). This article describes the first published structure of a ternary complex of a PROTAC bound to its target protein and a recruited E3 ubiquitin ligase. This structure supports the idea that protein–protein interactions between E3 and target contribute to PROTAC degradation activity.
Nowak, R. P. et al. Plasticity in binding confers selectivity in ligand-induced protein degradation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 706–714 (2018).
Roy, M. J. et al. SPR-measured dissociation kinetics of PROTAC ternary complexes influence target degradation rate. ACS Chem. Biol. 14, 361–368 (2019).
Riching, K. M. et al. Quantitative live-cell kinetic degradation and mechanistic profiling of PROTAC mode of action. ACS Chem. Biol. 13, 2758–2770 (2018). This paper describes a panel of cell-based assays aimed at independent evaluation (and optimization) of different aspects of the PROTAC mechanism.
Dawson, M. A. et al. Inhibition of BET recruitment to chromatin as an effective treatment for MLL-fusion leukaemia. Nature 478, 529–533 (2011).
Mertz, J. A. et al. Targeting MYC dependence in cancer by inhibiting BET bromodomains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16669–16674 (2011).
Shin, H. Y. Targeting super-enhancers for disease treatment and diagnosis. Mol. Cells 41, 506–514 (2018).
Lin, X. et al. HEXIM1 as a robust pharmacodynamic marker for monitoring target engagement of BET family bromodomain inhibitors in tumors and surrogate tissues. Mol. Cancer Ther. 16, 388–396 (2017).
Yeh, T. C. et al. Identification of CCR2 and CD180 as robust pharmacodynamic tumor and blood biomarkers for clinical use with BRD4/BET inhibitors. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 1025–1035 (2017).
Collins, T. A. et al. Translational modeling of drug-induced myelosuppression and effect of pretreatment myelosuppression for AZD5153, a selective BRD4 inhibitor. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 6, 357–364 (2017).
Kurtz, S. E. et al. Molecularly targeted drug combinations demonstrate selective effectiveness for myeloid- and lymphoid-derived hematologic malignancies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E7554–E7563 (2017).
Dawson, M. A. et al. Recurrent mutations, including NPM1c, activate a BRD4-dependent core transcriptional program in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 28, 311–320 (2014). This report is one of the earliest of a BET-dependent transcriptional programme that can be targeted therapeutically. In this case, the transcriptional programme is driven by a recurrent mutation that could in principle be used as a selection biomarker in specific subtypes of AML.
Bergsagel, P. L. & Kuehl, W. M. Chromosome translocations in multiple myeloma. Oncogene 20, 5611–5622 (2001).
Walker, B. A. et al. Translocations at 8q24 juxtapose MYC with genes that harbor superenhancers resulting in overexpression and poor prognosis in myeloma patients. Blood Cancer J. 4, e191 (2014).
Ceribelli, M. et al. Blockade of oncogenic IkappaB kinase activity in diffuse large B cell lymphoma by bromodomain and extraterminal domain protein inhibitors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 11365–11370 (2014).
Janouskova, H. et al. Opposing effects of cancer-type-specific SPOP mutants on BET protein degradation and sensitivity to BET inhibitors. Nat. Med. 23, 1046–1054 (2017).
Zhang, P. et al. Intrinsic BET inhibitor resistance in SPOP-mutated prostate cancer is mediated by BET protein stabilization and AKT-mTORC1 activation. Nat. Med. 23, 1055–1062 (2017).
Dai, X. et al. Prostate cancer-associated SPOP mutations confer resistance to BET inhibitors through stabilization of BRD4. Nat. Med. 23, 1063–1071 (2017). This article and that of Janouskova et al. (2017) and Zhang et al. (2017) provide evidence that supports the use of genetic features that lead to changes in BRD4 protein expression to identify a dependency that can be therapeutically targeted. Notably, SPOP is mutated in a significant number of prostate cancers, which suggests that it may be a relevant patient selection biomarker.
Jin, X. et al. DUB3 promotes BET inhibitor resistance and cancer progression by deubiquitinating BRD4. Mol. Cell 71, 592–605 (2018).
Xiang, Q. et al. Discovery and optimization of 1-(1H-indol-1-yl)ethanone derivatives as CBP/EP300 bromodomain inhibitors for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 147, 238–252 (2018).
Ogiwara, H. et al. Targeting p300 addiction in CBP-deficient cancers causes synthetic lethality by apoptotic cell death due to abrogation of MYC expression. Cancer Discov. 6, 430–445 (2016).
Holohan, C., Van Schaeybroeck, S., Longley, D. B. & Johnston, P. G. Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 714–726 (2013).
Schmitt, M. W., Loeb, L. A. & Salk, J. J. The influence of subclonal resistance mutations on targeted cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 13, 335–347 (2016).
Settleman, J. Cancer: bet on drug resistance. Nature 529, 289–290 (2016).
Fong, C. Y. et al. BET inhibitor resistance emerges from leukaemia stem cells. Nature 525, 538–542 (2015).
Rathert, P. et al. Transcriptional plasticity promotes primary and acquired resistance to BET inhibition. Nature 525, 543–547 (2015). This article and that of Fong et al. (2015) highlight the powerful effects of transcriptional plasticity on promoting tumour resistance to natural and therapeutic antitumour mechanisms. Furthermore, the findings suggest that intervening at multiple nodes of a transcriptional network may be required for tumour elimination.
Kumar, K. et al. GLI2-dependent c-MYC upregulation mediates resistance of pancreatic cancer cells to the BET bromodomain inhibitor JQ1. Sci. Rep. 5, 9489 (2015).
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).
Jang, J. E. et al. AMPK-ULK1-mediated autophagy confers resistance to BET inhibitor JQ1 in acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 2781–2794 (2017).
Lasorsa, E. et al. Mitochondrial protection impairs BET bromodomain inhibitor-mediated cell death and provides rationale for combination therapeutic strategies. Cell Death Dis. 6, e2014 (2015).
Conery, A. R. et al. Preclinical anticancer efficacy of BET bromodomain inhibitors is determined by the apoptotic response. Cancer Res. 76, 1313–1319 (2016). This article and that of Lasorsa et al. (2015) provide mechanistic support for ongoing trials testing the combination of BETis and BH3 mimetics.
Zhao, Y. et al. High-resolution mapping of RNA polymerases identifies mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance to BET inhibitors in t(8;21) AML. Cell Rep. 16, 2003–2016 (2016).
Shu, S. et al. Response and resistance to BET bromodomain inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer. Nature 529, 413–417 (2016).
Herquel, B. et al. Transcription cofactors TRIM24, TRIM28, and TRIM33 associate to form regulatory complexes that suppress murine hepatocellular carcinoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8212–8217 (2011).
Shi, X. et al. Loss of TRIM33 causes resistance to BET bromodomain inhibitors through MYC- and TGF-beta-dependent mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E4558–E4566 (2016).
Xi, Q. et al. A poised chromatin platform for TGF-beta access to master regulators. Cell 147, 1511–1524 (2011).
Ma, Y. et al. The MAPK pathway regulates intrinsic resistance to BET inhibitors in colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 2027–2037 (2017).
Kurimchak, A. M. et al. Resistance to BET bromodomain inhibitors is mediated by kinome reprogramming in ovarian cancer. Cell Rep. 16, 1273–1286 (2016).
Marcotte, R. et al. Functional genomic landscape of human breast cancer drivers, vulnerabilities, and resistance. Cell 164, 293–309 (2016).
Stuhlmiller, T. J. et al. Inhibition of lapatinib-induced kinome reprogramming in ERBB2-positive breast cancer by targeting BET family bromodomains. Cell Rep. 11, 390–404 (2015).
Stratikopoulos, E. E. et al. Kinase and BET inhibitors together clamp inhibition of PI3K signaling and overcome resistance to therapy. Cancer Cell 27, 837–851 (2015).
Asangani, I. A. et al. Therapeutic targeting of BET bromodomain proteins in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature 510, 278–282 (2014).
Asangani, I. A. et al. BET bromodomain inhibitors enhance efficacy and disrupt resistance to AR antagonists in the treatment of prostate cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 14, 324–331 (2016).
Faivre, E. J. et al. Exploitation of castration-resistant prostate cancer transcription factor dependencies by the novel BET inhibitor ABBV-075. Mol. Cancer Res. 15, 35–44 (2017).
Constellation Pharmaceuticals. Constellation Pharmaceuticals enhances and expands phase 2 MANIFEST study of CPI-0610 in myelofibrosis. Constellation Pharmaceuticals http://ir.constellationpharma.com/news-releases/news-release-details/constellation-pharmaceuticals-enhances-and-expands-phase-2 (2018).
Schaffer, M. et al. Identification of potential ibrutinib combinations in hematological malignancies using a combination high-throughput screen. Leuk. Lymphoma 59, 931–940 (2017).
Lam, L. T. et al. Vulnerability of small cell lung cancer to apoptosis induced by the combination of BET bromodomain proteins and BCL2 inhibitors. Mol. Cancer Ther. 16, 1511–1520 (2017).
Peirs, S. et al. Targeting BET proteins improves the therapeutic efficacy of BCL-2 inhibition in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 31, 2037–2047 (2017).
Bui, M. H. et al. Preclinical characterization of BET family bromodomain inhibitor ABBV-075 suggests combination therapeutic strategies. Cancer Res. 77, 2976–2989 (2017).
Wang, H. et al. JQ1 synergizes with the Bcl-2 inhibitor ABT-263 against MYCN-amplified small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 8, 86312–86324 (2017).
Esteve-Arenys, A. et al. The BET bromodomain inhibitor CPI203 overcomes resistance to ABT-199 (venetoclax) by downregulation of BFL-1/A1 in in vitro and in vivo models of MYC+/BCL2+ double hit lymphoma. Oncogene 37, 1830–1844 (2018).
Johnson-Farley, N., Veliz, J., Bhagavathi, S. & Bertino, J. R. ABT-199, a BH3 mimetic that specifically targets Bcl-2, enhances the antitumor activity of chemotherapy, bortezomib and JQ1 in “double hit” lymphoma cells. Leuk. Lymphoma 56, 2146–2152 (2015).
Karakashev, S. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition synergizes with PARP inhibitor in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cell Rep. 21, 3398–3405 (2017).
Sun, C. et al. BRD4 inhibition is synthetic lethal with PARP inhibitors through the induction of homologous recombination deficiency. Cancer Cell 33, 401–416 (2018).
Wilson, A. J., Stubbs, M., Liu, P., Ruggeri, B. & Khabele, D. The BET inhibitor INCB054329 reduces homologous recombination efficiency and augments PARP inhibitor activity in ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 149, 575–584 (2018).
Zenith Epigenetics. Zenith Epigenetics announces clinical trial collaboration with Pfizer. Zenith Epigenetics https://www.zenithepigenetics.com/newsroom/news-releases.html?article=28 (2018).
Moros, A. et al. Synergistic antitumor activity of lenalidomide with the BET bromodomain inhibitor CPI203 in bortezomib-resistant mantle cell lymphoma. Leukemia 28, 2049–2059 (2014).
Zhu, H. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition promotes anti-tumor immunity by suppressing PD-L1 expression. Cell Rep. 16, 2829–2837 (2016).
Hogg, S. J. et al. BET-bromodomain inhibitors engage the host immune system and regulate expression of the immune checkpoint ligand PD-L1. Cell Rep. 18, 2162–2174 (2017).
Kagoya, Y. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition enhances T cell persistence and function in adoptive immunotherapy models. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 3479–3494 (2016). This article is the first to demonstrate the potential for ex vivo treatment of T cells with BETis to enhance antitumour immunity, which would mitigate any toxic effects or immune suppression that may arise from systemic delivery of BETis.
Filippakopoulos, P. et al. Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains. Nature 468, 1067–1073 (2010).
Wai, D. C. C. et al. The BRD3 ET domain recognizes a short peptide motif through a mechanism that is conserved across chromatin remodelers and transcriptional regulators. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 7160–7175 (2018).
Lambert, J.-P. et al. Interactome rewiring following pharmacological targeting of BET bromodomains. Mol. Cell 73, 621–638 (2019).
Tsai, W. W. et al. TRIM24 links a non-canonical histone signature to breast cancer. Nature 468, 927–932 (2010).
Thakur, J. K., Yadav, A. & Yadav, G. Molecular recognition by the KIX domain and its role in gene regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 2112–2125 (2014).
Delvecchio, M., Gaucher, J., Aguilar-Gurrieri, C., Ortega, E. & Panne, D. Structure of the p300 catalytic core and implications for chromatin targeting and HAT regulation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1040–1046 (2013).
Zhang, Y. et al. The ZZ domain of p300 mediates specificity of the adjacent HAT domain for histone H3. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 841–849 (2018).
Park, S. et al. Role of the CBP catalytic core in intramolecular SUMOylation and control of histone H3 acetylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E5335–E5342 (2017).
Huang, B., Yang, X. D., Zhou, M. M., Ozato, K. & Chen, L. F. Brd4 coactivates transcriptional activation of NF-kappaB via specific binding to acetylated RelA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 1375–1387 (2009).
Lamonica, J. M. et al. Bromodomain protein Brd3 associates with acetylated GATA1 to promote its chromatin occupancy at erythroid target genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E159–E168 (2011).
Gamsjaeger, R. et al. Structural basis and specificity of acetylated transcription factor GATA1 recognition by BET family bromodomain protein Brd3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 2632–2640 (2011).
Shi, J. et al. Disrupting the interaction of BRD4 with diacetylated Twist suppresses tumorigenesis in basal-like breast cancer. Cancer Cell 25, 210–225 (2014).
Liu, J. et al. Targeting the BRD4/FOXO3a/CDK6 axis sensitizes AKT inhibition in luminal breast cancer. Nat. Commun. 9, 5200 (2018). This article and those from Huang et al. (2009), Lamonica et al. (2011), Gamsjaeger et al. (2011) and Shi et al. (2014) demonstrate that BD function is not restricted to histone binding and that BDs can recruit transcription factors in functionally relevant ways.
Bassi, Z. I. et al. Modulating PCAF/GCN5 immune cell function through a PROTAC approach. ACS Chem. Biol. 13, 2862–2867 (2018).
Gechijian, L. N. et al. Functional TRIM24 degrader via conjugation of ineffectual bromodomain and VHL ligands. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 405–412 (2018).
Galdeano, C. et al. Structure-guided design and optimization of small molecules targeting the protein-protein interaction between the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) E3 ubiquitin ligase and the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) alpha subunit with in vitro nanomolar affinities. J. Med. Chem. 57, 8657–8663 (2014).
A.R.C. thanks colleagues at Constellation Pharmaceuticals for input and discussions about the manuscript.
A.G.C. is an employee of Genentech, R.J.S. was, and A.R.C. is, an employee of Constellation Pharmaceuticals. Constellation Pharmaceuticals has progressed a bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) inhibitor into clinical trials.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
RCSB Protein Data Bank: https://www.rcsb.org/
- Phenotypic screening
Chemical compounds can be screened for a desired biological effect or phenotype (usually in cell culture) rather than screening for binding to, or inhibition of, a purified protein.
- Fragment-based ligand discovery
Fragments are low-molecular-weight chemical compounds that, although binding weakly to targets (with high micromolar to millimolar dissociation constants (Kd)), can be used to efficiently explore chemical space with a small compound collection.
- BET bromodomains
Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) family proteins include BRD2, BRD3, BRD4 and bromodomain testis-specific protein (BRDT). Each BET-family protein has two bromodomains (BD1 and BD2). BD1 and BD2 are highly similar to one another (therefore many drugs bind to both BD1 and BD2), and each is nearly identical across the BET family. BET inhibitors therefore bind to all four BET-family proteins, with any selectivity limited to the differences between BD1 and BD2.
Groups of small molecules related to one another by structure. Different chemotypes exhibiting the same expected mechanism of action (for example, bromodomain inhibition) are useful in establishing that cellular effects are likely caused by modulation of the intended target.
- NUT midline carcinoma
A rare but aggressive squamous cell carcinoma that results from chromosomal rearrangements of the gene encoding nuclear protein in testis (NUT), frequently resulting in fusion with BET proteins (BRD4–NUT or BRD3–NUT).
- Pleiotropic effects
A drug may modulate the intended target or may bind to an unrelated (and often unknown) target. Each of these can produce biological effects. One challenge in the use of chemical probes to learn about biology is separating on-target effects from any other effects.
- Positive transcription elongation factor b
(P-TEFb). Also known as the CDK9–cyclinT heterodimer, P-TEFb phosphorylates and activates RNA polymerase II. The BRD4 carboxy-terminal domain binds P-TEFb at promoters and enhancer regions.
- Proteolysis-targeting chimaera
(PROTAC). Bifunctional molecules that induce targeted protein degradation through co-opting the cellular ubiquitin machinery.
- Nucleosome core particle
This basic unit of chromatin is a histone protein octamer (two copies each of histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4) wrapped twice by ~147 bp of DNA.
- NanoBRET assay
A cellular assay measuring the proximity of two proteins through bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), as developed by the Promega Corporation. For bromodomain (BD) research, the assay usually involves an expressed fusion of the luciferase variant nanoLuc to a histone protein. The BD protein is fused to the HaloTag protein. Cells are treated with a fluorescent ligand that covalently attaches to the expressed HaloTag protein. If the tagged BD binds to the histone, BRET occurs. Addition of a BD inhibitor reduces the BRET signal.
- Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) assay
A cellular assay in which laser-induced photobleaching of a fluorescent protein localized in an area of a cell results in a dark spot that can be repopulated by dynamically relocalizing fluorescent proteins. The half-time (t1/2) for recovery of fluorescence is a measure of how strongly localized the bulk population is. For example, a bromodomain (BD) binding to chromatin is less dynamic than an inhibitor-bound BD that is not bound to chromatin. The inhibitor will result in a reduced recovery t1/2 in a FRAP assay.
Substrates degraded by the cellular ubiquitin system are often recognized through sequence motifs (degrons) that may or may not include post-translational modifications regulating degradation.
- ‘Click’ chemistry
‘Click’ reactions are crosslinking chemistries that are both selective and sufficiently mild to be useful in complex biological samples.
About this article
Cite this article
Cochran, A.G., Conery, A.R. & Sims, R.J. Bromodomains: a new target class for drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 18, 609–628 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-019-0030-7
Validation of the epigenetic reader bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) as a therapeutic target for treatment of airway remodeling
Drug Discovery Today (2020)
Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension (2020)
Selectivity via Cooperativity: Preferential Stabilization of the p65/14-3-3 Interaction with Semisynthetic Natural Products
Journal of the American Chemical Society (2020)
Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents (2020)
Future Medicinal Chemistry (2020)